[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:08]
>> WE WILL OPEN OUR PLANNING BOARD MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, EFORE WE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE, I HAD PLANNED ON MAKING SOME STATEMENTS CONCERNING THE REMEMBRANCE OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. BUT AFTER THE FOUR DAYS OF MEDIA COVERAGE, I DON'T THINK THERE IS MUCH LEFT TO BE SAID.
BUT I WOULD LIKE TO OBSERVE A MOMENT OF SILENCE AND NOT ONLY THINK ABOUT THE COUNTRY AND HOW THAT EVENT IMPACTED AMERICA AND IMPACTED US IN MANY, MANY DIFFERENT WAYS.
BUT PARTICULARLY HERE IN FORT PIERCE.
I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO REMEMBER CC ROSS LYLES WHO WAS A NEW AIRLINE STUDENT. SHOULD BEEN A POLICE OFFICER HERE IN FORT PIERCE FOR SIX YEARS, WENT TO HIGH SCHOOL HERE. SHE WAS INVOLVED IN A NONPROFIT THAT COUNSELED NOT ONLY DRUG USERS, BUT ALSO YOUNG PEOPLE HERE IN FORT PIERCE THAT WERE HAVING PROBLEMS IN SCHOOL.
FROM BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS TO ATTENDANCE PROBLEMS. SHE WAS A REAL HERO. SHE WAS ON FLIGHT 93, THAT CRASHED IN STATESVILLE PENNSYLVANIA JUST OFF INTERSTATE 81, RIGHT? AND SHE WAS ONE OF THE 40 PEOPLE ON THAT AIRPLANE. AND LIVED HERE IN FORT PIERCE AND HAD QUITE AN IMPACT ON OUR COMMUNITY.
SO AS WE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, WOULD LIKE TO ALSO TAKE A MOMENT OF SILENCE. THANK YOU.
NOW FOR THE PLEDGE. PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND
JUSTICE FOR ALL. >> THANK YOU.
WOULD LIKE TO REMIND EVERYBODY TO TURN THESE FANCY DEVICES OFF THAT WE ALL GET CONNECTED TO IN OUR LIVES.
WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL CALL, PLEASE?
>> YOU> MS. BAKER . >> PRESENT.
>> CHAIRMAN MILLER. >> PRESENT.
>> MS. JOHNSON SCOTT JUST ARRIVED.HE IS PRESENT.
[4. CONSIDERATION OF ABSENCES]
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION THAT MR. ALBURY HAS HAD A DEATH IN HIS FAMILY. AND I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO KEEP HIM IN MIND AND HIS FAMILYIN MIND .
AND WITH THAT I WILL TAKE A MOTION FOR HIS ABSENCE.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. BRODERICK ,
SECONDED BY MISS CLEMONS. >> MR. BRODERICK.
[a. Minutes from the August 9, 2021 meeting]
>> YOU.> MS. JOHNSON SCOTT. >> YES.
>> MS. BAKER. >> YES.> MS. CLEMENTS.
>> YES . >> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER.
>> YES, MA'AM. I WOULD ALSO ENTERTAIN NOW A MOTION FOR ITEM 5A FOR THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 2009
MEETING. >> MOVE THE APPROVAL OF THE
[b. Minutes from the August 23, 2021 special meeting]
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MOTION BY MS. JOHNSON SCOTT, SECONDED
BY MS. CLEMENTS. >> MS. JOHNSON SCOTT.
>> MR. BRODERICK. >> YES.> CHAIRMAN
I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THE MINUTES FOR OUR AUGUST 23
MEETING. >> I MOVE FOR APPROVAL.
>> SECOND. >> MOTION BY MISS CLEMONS, SECOND BY MS. BAKER. CALLED A ROLL, PLEASE.
>> MS. BAKER. >> YOU.> MISS CLEMONS.
>> YES.> MS. JOHNSON-SCOTT. >> YES.
>> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A CHANGE IN OUR AGENDA AND I AM GOING TO MOVE THE ITEMS O THROUGH S,
[o. Conditional Use, Development Review and Design Review - RV Storage - 2192 Peters Road]
[00:05:02]
WHICH ARE ONLY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS, I'M GOING TO MOVE THOSE AND HEAR THOSE FIRST. TO OUR NEXT ORDER OF BUSINESS IS NEW BUSINESS AND WE WILL BE HEARING ITEM OH.ITEM 6O. AND I THINK MR. CRAGIN IS GOING
TO PRESENT THAT. >> YES, I WILL.
I WILL GIVE IT A MOMENT FOR IT TO COME ON SCREEN.
CAN EVERYBODY SEE IT YET? PERFECT.
GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.
BEFORE YOU IS A CONDITIONAL USE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION WHICH INCLUDES SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2192 PETERS ROAD. THIS PROPERTY WAS RECENTLY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY LIMITS AND PLANNING BOARD RECENTLY HEARD A REZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE CHANGE FOR THE PROPERTY NOT TOO LONG AGO. PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS A PENDING GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE OF A PENDING GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING. THE REQUEST IS FOR THE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE LOT WITH 503 CUPBOARDS PARKING SPACES, TEMPORARY SALES TRAILER AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING AND IS CONSISTENT WITH 125, 237, 125 313 AND 125 314 THE CITY CODE ENCUMBERING THE PLAN FOR YOU AND IT DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, CONVENIENCE AND GENERAL WELFARE. ON-SCREEN IS THE SITE PLAN.
AS NOTED THERE WILL BE 503 COVERED RV SPACES AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AND THERE'S GOING TO BE PROPOSED WHAT DETENTION POND WITH A WATER FEATURE.
AND WERE VERY TRAILER IS GOING TO BE LOCATED TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE PROPERTY AND THERE IS ALSO GOING TO BE A TREE PROTECTION AREA THAT WILL CULMINATE 3.03 ACRES ON THE CORNER OF GRAHAM ROAD AND PETERS ROAD.
LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL PROVIDE FOR 316TREES, 327 CIVIL POEMS IN 1780 SHRUBS . BECAUSE THERE WILL BE A LARGE TREE PROTECTION AREA AND THERE IS ALSO A LOT OF LANDSCAPE AND IS GOING TO BE ADDED TO THIS PROJECT, YOUR MITIGATION WILL NOT BE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME, BUT IF THERE IS ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON THAT TREE PROTECTION AREA, THE MITIGATION WOULD BE LOOKED AT AT THAT TIME.
JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA WHAT THE PROPOSED SALES TRAILER IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE ALONG WITH THE COVERED PARKING AREA.
SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU WOULD SEE AT AN AIRPORT PARKING.
STUFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS.
A LANDSCAPE BOND FOR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO CITY CODE 123 ÃSIX PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION FOR THE RV STORAGE LOT AND AS A OFFICE BUILDING IS BEING DEFINED AS A TEMPORARY BY THE APPLICANT, TEMPORARY USE APPLICATION WITH PLENTY DEPARTMENT WANTING TO BE APPLIED FOR AN ANNUAL BASIS UNTIL THE BUILDING IS REMOVED FROM THE SITE.
THEY SHALL BE FIRST PROVIDED WITH A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STORAGE LOT AND SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON THE EXPIRATION OF EACH SUBSEQUENT APPROVAL.
TYPICALLY THE APPROVALS LAST FOR ONE YEAR.
POSSIBLE ACTIONS BY THE PLANNING BOARD TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO STAFFS TO CONDITIONS AND YOU CAN RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THE ADDITIONAL CONDITION FOR CHANGES IN RECOMMEND DISAPPROVAL.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
THANK YOU. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD FOR MR. CRAGIN?
>> I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS. ANDSCAPE PACKAGE APPEARS AS THOUGHIT IS ABOVE THE MINIMUM THRESHOLD REQUIRED.
IS THAT A FAIR ASSESSMENT. >> THAT WOULD BE CORRECT.
>> THAT IS WHERE THE TRUE MITIGATION ISSUE DOESN'T BECOME AN ISSUE AT THIS TIME.> THAT AND THE LARGER AREA THAT THEY
ARE PRESERVING . >> THE WATER FEATURE, IS THAT FOR ON-SITE WATER RETAINAGE? ARE THEY PUTTING IN A WATER
FEATURE. >> THEY WILL PUT IN WATER FEATURE UPON STAFFS REQUEST TO ENHANCE DESIGN REVIEW SINCE IT IS A LONG 95 BUT IT ALSO HELPS FOR THE ELBOW THE WATER AS
WELL. >> SOUNDS PRETTY UPSCALE FOR AN
RV STORAGE FACILITY. >> THEY ARE SPRINGING UP EVERYWHERE. THAT IS ALL I HAVE.HANKS.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NOT HEARING ANY I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING.
I'M GUESSING OUT OF ALL YOU SOMEBODY HERE IS REPRESENTING THIS PROJECT. IF YOU WOULD STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND SIGN IN, PLEASE.
>> YES, SIR. LEE DOBBINS WAS A LAW FIRM HERE IN FORT PIERCE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT AND WE ALSO HAVE A COUPLE REPRESENTATIVE OF KINLEY HORN, THE ENGINEERING FIRM THAT DID THE PLANTS THAT ARE IN FRONT OF YOU.
WE DON'T HAVE A PRESENTATION OR ANYTHING, WE ARE JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN ADD THAT
MR. CRAGIN DIDN'T COVER? >> I DON'T BELIEVE SO.
I THINK YOU DID A GOOD JOB COVERING IT.
JUST MENTIONED ABOUT RV BEING POPULAR RIGHT NOW.
WE SEEM TO HAVE A NUMBER OF RV USES IN THE AREA AND SEEMS TO BE ATTRACTING THOSE TO THE AREA.
[00:10:09]
I THINK FOR THAT REASON IT WOULD LOOK TO THEM TO BE A GOOD LOCATION TO PUT IN RV STORAGE FACILITY.>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I THINK IT IS TOO.
MR. CRAGIN ALWAYS DOES A GOOD JOB.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? I'M NOT SEEING ANY.HANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> THANK YOU THANK YOU FOR MOVING US UP ON
THE AGENDA . >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER:
CERTAINLY. >> WE DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE TO BUY EVERYBODY DINNER HERE TONIGHT.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I LIKE TO TAKE CARE OF THE APPLICANTS BEFORE WE GO INTO CITY BUSINESS WHEN I CAN.
IS THERE ANYONE ELSE SPEAKING TO THIS PROJECT? I'M NOT SEEING ANYONE, I WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING FOR YOU AND ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE
BOARD? >> FROM MY PERSPECTIVE IT IS PERFECTLY LOCATED ADJACENT TO 95.
IT'S A GOOD USE OF THE PROPERTY.
AND I THINK IT IS A GOOD PROJECT.
>> I AGREE. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANYTHING ELSE? I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> MOTION TO APPROVE. >>SECOND WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS . >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY MR. BRODERICK WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, SECOND BY MS. BAKER.
>> THIS JOHNSON-SCOTT. >> YOU.
>> MS. BAKER.> YES. >> MS. CLEMONS.
[p. Development and Design Review - Project Hurricane - 2398 Peters Road]
>> YES. >> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM.
IT IS MOVED TO THE COMMISSION NEXT.
THE NEXT ITEM IS ITEM PEAK, DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR PROJECT HURRICANE 2398 PETERS ROAD.
MR. CRAGIN IS GOING TO PRESENT THIS ONE AS WELL.
>> THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND DESIGN REVIEW SITE PLAN FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2398 PETERS ROAD WOULD ALSO PROPERTY THAT RECENTLY WENT THROUGH THE ANNEXATION PROCESS AND THE BOARD MOST RECENTLY SAW THIS WITH A VIGILANTE USE AND REZONING REQUEST. CURRENT AND FUTURE LAND USES GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR THE REQUEST IS FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE 39,200 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING FOR THE RETAIL SALES AND SERVICE OF RVS WITH ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
STATUS ARE COMMITTING APPROVAL AS IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING USESAND ZONING. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH 125 313 AT 125 314 OF THE CITY CODE AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUT DOES NOT AFFECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH , SAFETY, CONVENIENCE AND GENERAL WELFARE. HEAR THE SITE PLAN AS I NOTED WILL PROVIDE FOR 39,200 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING PARIS THAT WILL BE BROKEN UP INTO 9200 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SIX SALE AT 16,000 OF SERVICE BAYS AND 4000 SQUARE FEET FOR A BODY SHOP. THERE WILL BE 489 VEHICLE SPACES THAT WILL: INVENTORY AND CUSTOMER PARKING AND THERE WILL BE 261 TREES AND 1381 SHRUBS THAT WILL BE PLANTED.
THERE WILL BE A LAKE WITH A WATER FEATURE THAT WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE PROJECT AS WELL.
JUST A RENDERING TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA WHAT THE BUILDING WILL LOOK LIKE UPON COMPLETION. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING THREE CONDITIONS FOR THE TRUE MITIGATION AS OUTLINED OF THE TRUE MITIGATION PLAN SHALL BE PAID OVER THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
LANDSCAPE ON FOR ALL SITE LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO CITY CODE 123 ÃSIX PRIOR TO THE ASSURANCE OF A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE SITE AND AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW PLANTING SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED LAKE.
POSSIBLE ACTIONS ARE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL .
SUBJECT TO STAFFS THREE CONDITIONS.
CAN RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CHANGES OR ALTERNATIVE CONDITIONS OR RECOMMEND DISAPPROVAL.
I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MR. CRAGIN, HOW MANY TREES DID YOU
SAY WERE GOING TO BE PLANTED? >> APPROXIMATELY 261.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: WE STILL NEED TREE MITIGATION?
>> YES, THEY WILL STILL NEED TRUE MITIGATION.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: BECAUSE? >> SO THE CITY TREE MITIGATION CODE ONLY ALLOWS FOR HAVE A CREDIT WHEN A TREE IS TAKEN DOWN. AND USUALLY THE TREES ARE 2.5 TO THREE CALIBERS. TYPICALLY A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT THAT IS NEEDED TO MAKE UP ON THE TREES ARE PLANTED.
>> IF I MAY ADD, WE ARE REVISING THIS SECTION OF OUR LANDSCAPE CODE WHICH WILL BE COMING FORWARD TO YOU ALL IN OCTOBER WE TAKE INTO ACCOUNT WITH A FOOTPRINT WILL BE IMPORTANT WHEN YOU HAVE A SITE AND YOU WANT TO DEVELOP IT SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT HAS TO BE A LOCATION PARIS RIGHT NOW THEY HAVE TO MITIGATE THE ENTIRE SITE.
ALSO RECOMMENDING A LARGER SIZE CALIBER FOR TREES AND THEREFORE
THE LOVES OF MITIGATION. >> DO WE TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION OUR FRIENDLY BRAZILIAN PEPPER TREES?
[00:15:04]
>> YES. ALL THE EXOTICS YOU DON'T HAVE
TO MITIGATE FOR. >> THAT IS ALREADY WITHIN OUR
CODE. >> IS ONLY TREES AND INMATE
MITIGATED FOR. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ALL RIGHT FORGET ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
>> MY ONLY OTHER COMMENT S A GREAT PROJECT.
THRILLED TO SEE IT. AND PERFECTLY LOCATED.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING. ANYONE SPEAKING TO THE PROJECT? AND YOU WILL STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND SIGN IN
MONTHLY. >> DAVID BAGGETT 210 250 SOUTHWEST. NORTH PARKWAY OREGON ENGINEER RECORD ON THE PROJECT FOR EDC. I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR HANGING OUT TODAY. RANDOMNESS DONE A GOOD JOB HELPING US OUT PRESENTING THE PROJECT PORTON IT IS A LOCATION IS PERFECTLY SITUATED AND WE HAVE BEEN DOING ÃIT IS FUNNY TO SEE EVERYBODY ELSE HERE IN THE AUDIENCE WITH THEIR PROJECTS UP BECAUSE WE HAVE ALL BEEN COORDINATING ON STRATEGIZING HOW TO MAKE ALL THESE PIECES FIT TOGETHER.
THANK YOU. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YOU ALL
ARE DOING A GOOD JOB. >> SEE YOU BY YOUR RV THERE AND YOU DRIVE IT OVER TO THE STORAGE LOT OVER THERE.
>> PLANNING AT ITS BEST, RIGHT? >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I WANT TO BE THE NURSERY THAT PROVIDES ALL THE TREES IN THE BUSHES.
I MISSED THE BOAT HERE, I THINK.
ANY QUESTIONS? I'M NOT SEEING ANY.ANYONE ELSE SPEAKING TO THIS PROJECT? I'M NOT SEEING ANYONE, I WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING.
ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? NOT HEARING AND IN YOU AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.> MOVE APPROVAL WITH A STAFF
>> APPROVAL WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FROM MS. BAKER AND A SECOND FROM MS. CLEMONS. CALLED THE ROLL, PLEASE.
>> MS. BAKER.> YES. >> MS. CLEMONS.
>> YES, MA'AM. >> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM.
I FAILED TO MENTION WHEN WE OPENED THE MEETING THAT I WOULD LIKE TO KEEP THIS THING MOVING ALONG BECAUSE THERE IS A COMMISSION MEETING COMING IN BEHIND US AT 5:05.
[q. Development and Design Review - Kings Highway Commerce Park - 2496 S. Kings Highway (9 Parcels)]
I CAN SEE WE ARE DOING THIS VERY WELL ANYWAY.NEXT ITEM ON THE LIST IS ITEM Q. DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW KINGS HIGHWAY COMMERCE PARK 2496 S. KINGS HIGHWAY.
MR. CRAGIN IS PRESENTING. >> BEFORE YOU TODAY A DEVELOPMENT DESIGN SITE PLAN FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2496.
IS A CULMINATION OF NINE DIFFERENT PROPERTIES AND I WILL REITERATE AGAIN YOU WILL SEE IN THIS AND ALSO REZONING CHANGE FOR THE PROPERTY PARCELS HAVE A FUTURE LAND USE WITH ACP ONE COMMERCIAL PARKWAY ZONING TO REVIEW THE REQUEST IS FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FILAMENT DESIGN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT TWO BUILDINGS TOTALING 485,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION SPACE WITH ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING TO BEGIN IS CONSISTENT WITH 125 313 AND 125 THROUGH 14 OF THE CITY CODE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IT DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, CONVENIENCE AND GENERAL WELFARE. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SITE PLAN, THE TWO BUILDINGS FOR PHASE 1 WILL BE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT.
AS NOTED, THE TWO BUILDINGS WILL BEAPPROXIMATELY 485,000 SQUARE FEET IN TOTAL . THERE IS ALSO GOING TO BE A FUTURE PHASE 2 TO THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT WILL ALLOCATE APPROXIMATELY 1.3 MILLION AND ÃONE TO FORMULA AN ADDITIONAL FEET OF BUILDING SPACE.
WHEN THE TOTAL PROJECT 1.9 MILLION OF OFFICE WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION SPACE TO THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING THREE DIFFERENT LAKES WITH A WATER FEATURE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. WILL ALSO BE ADDING DRIED ATTENTION AND DRAWS ATTENTION BILES WELL AREA WHICH WILL ADD A FOR MORE LANDSCAPING THERE WOULD BE A COMPLETE RECONSTRUCTION OF WHITE ROAD. THE APPLICANT REALLY LOOKING WITH DOT, WHICH I BELIEVE THE DOT HAS A READY COMPLETED RECENTLY BRING THERE WILL BE A TRAFFIC LIGHT AT THE INTERSECTION OF WHITE ROAD AND RESEARCH ROAD AND HE WAS ONE OF THE APPLICANT COORDINATED WITH THE DOT.
AND THERE WOULD BE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE A ROAD THAT WOULD NOT ONLY BENEFIT THIS PROJECT BUT THE OTHER TWO PROJECTS THAT YOU JUST HEARD. THIS IS TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF
[00:20:01]
WHAT EVERYTHING IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE UPON COMPLETION THIRD ONE IS A REALLY INTERESTING FUTURE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE APPLICANT WAS ADAMANT ABOUT ADDING GREEN WALLS WERE LIVING MOST OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THINK THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS GOING TO BE REALLY GOOD FOR THE PROPERTY IN THE DEVELOPMENT.AND I AM GLAD THEY CAME UP WITH THE IDEA.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE TO PERMIT LANDSCAPE ON FOR ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE SITE.
AND PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE WORK PERMIT ALL PROPERTIES CONTAINED WITHIN THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT WILL NEED TO BE COMBINED THREE PARCEL COMBINATION WITH THE ST. LOUIS APPRAISERS OFFICE AND UNITY OF TITLE WITH THE ST. LOUIS COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL SUBJECT TO TWO CONDITIONS. THE PLANNING BOARD COULD ALSO RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH ALTERNATIVE CONDITIONS OR CHANGES OR YOU COULD RECOMMEND HIS APPROVAL TO OREGON I AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MR. CRAGIN, FOR THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCEWHO MAY BE WATCHING ÃI DON'T SEE ANY PUBLIC NECESSARILY . BUT I THINK YOU ALL ARE INVOLVED IN THE PROJECTS. WOULD YOU EXPLAIN THE GREEN
WALL? >> MORE OR LESS A GREEN WALL IS MORE A LIVING WILL AS IT CAN BE CALLED.
YOU CAN GROW LANDSCAPING ELEMENTS ON A. USUALLY FINDS OVER SOME SORT OF VEGETATION CAN GROW ON THE WALL.
SO IT'S LIVING. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: IN THE
BENEFIT FOR THAT? >> AIR QUALITY IS ONE THING THAT COULD BENEFIT FROM IT. I HAVE SEEN THESE INSIDE ONE OF THE BRIGHT LINE STATIONS IRRITABLY THE ONE ON WEST PALM BEACH. IF YOU HAVE EVER BEEN TO THE BRIGHT LINE STATION IT WILL BE SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THIS.
>> AND AESTHETICS OF COURSE IT. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: OF THE
QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD? >> JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
WHAT IS THE TRAFFIC FLOW GOING TO BE IN ORDER TO GET TRUCKS TO THIS LOCATION? WHAT ROAD IS IT GOING TO BE
USED? >> THEY ARE GOING TO USE KINGS HIGHWAY IN THE RECONSTRUCTED RIGHT ROAD.
>> BRANDON, THIS APPEARS TO BE ANOTHER IN A SERIES OF LARGE DISTRIBUTION CENTERS SETTING UP BASES OF OPERATION, WHICH OBVIOUSLY IS GREAT TO SEE IF MEMORY IS CORRECT THIS WOULD PUT US SOMEWHERE OVER 4.5, 5 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF SPACE THAT THIS BODY HAS APPROVED FOR DISTRIBUTION CENTERS IN THE LAST SIX MONTHS, SOME OF WHICH ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
IS THAT WHAT THE PLAN IS FOR THIS DIVISION TO FACILITY?
>> THAT WILL BE SIMILAR TO CROSS INDUSTRIAL PARK.
>> I DON'T THINK THERE IS 5 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF PEACE AND ALL OF FORT PIERCE. IN THIS OBVIOUSLY IS, THE REASON I AM COMMENTING ON IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE LAST MEETING THAT THE REASON FOR IT IS THE PROXIMITY TO ALL OF SOUTH FLORIDA THE LAND IS AFFORDABLE AND THEY CAN SO IT IS A JUMP OFF POINT TO SOUTH FLORIDA. AND I HAVE A SENSE THAT WE ARE GOING TO BE SEEING A LOT MORE OF THIS.
AND I'M JUST CURIOUS PROGRAMS IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT.
IS ANOTHER GREAT PROJECT FOR FORT PIERCE.
THE ENORMITY OF THE TRUCK AND TRAFFIC, IS THIS ALL BEING CONTEMPLATED BY THE STATE AS WE KEEP ADDING MORE SQUARE
FOOTAGE? >> IT IS PART OF OUR TRC REVIEW THAT DOT HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO OPINE ON THIS PROJECT.
WITH THE RECONSTRUCTION OF KINGS HIGHWAY FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND IT HAS CAPACITY TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THIS.
BUT AS FAR AS I AM AWARE, DOT WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR IN A NEW DEVELOPMENT THAT COMES IN AS THEY ARE PART OF THE TRC.
AND IT GOES THROUGH A TRAFFIC REVIEW PROCESS WITH THE ST.
LOUIS ACCOUNTING. TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA, I BELIEVE IF I AM NOT MISTAKEN, THE PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED IN MAY AND WENT TO TRC IN JUNE THE PLANNING BOARD IS SEEING IT IN SEPTEMBER. HAS GONE THROUGH AN EXTENSIVE TIMELINE AND PROCESS REVIEW THROUGH VARIOUS DIFFERENT
DEPARTMENTS. >> TO THE BEST OF THEM KNOWLEDGE, I BELIEVE THAT 95 FROM INDIANTOWN ROAD UP INTO OUR AREA IS GOING THROUGH THE STUDY, WHICH WILL BE
CONSIDERING WHITENING. >> THERE IS ALSO ACTIVITY
CONCERNING THE TURNPIKE. >> MAYBE THAT IS WHAT IT WAS.
>> WHITENING AND A NEW EXIT AT MIDWAY ROAD.
>> THAT WILL BE ADDING 1/3 LANE AS WELL.
>> THERE IS A LOT OF CONSIDERATION IN THE MAJOR ARTERIES TO GET THAT TRAFFIC IN AND OUT OF THIS AREA.
>> WE ARE NOW FACING THESE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS IN THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE CITY. JENKINS ROADWITH OLDER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED .I CAN'T
[00:25:07]
GUESS HOW MANY TRACTOR-TRAILERS WILL BE COMING IN WITH 5 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF FACE FOR THAT WILL BE A MASSIVE TRAFFIC AND FLEX. AND I AM ALL FOR IT AS LONG AS SURFACE ROADS ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO KEEP PACE.KINGS HIGHWAY HAS BEEN UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR TWO YEARS NOW.
>> WITH THE ADDED ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION WITH THIS PROJECT, THIS IS GOING TO BENEFIT FROM THAT KINGS HIGHWAY PROJECT.
RECONSTRUCTION WHITE ROAD AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF PETERS ROAD
TOO. >> ARE DEVELOPERS RESPONSIBLE
>> IT IS INTERESTING. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE WITH ALL THE NEW DEVELOPMENT COMING ON KINGS HIGHWAY, THE NEED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS HIS IMPETUS FOR REDEVELOPMENT.
ONCE YOU BUILD IF THEY WILL COME.
>> WE ARE SAYING THAT MORE AND MORE AND MORE TOWARD ALMOST EVERY MEETING WE ARE DEALING WITH APPROVING MORE PROJECTS THAT WE KNOW ARE GOING INTO ONE WHAT WAS ONCE FARMLAND AND NOW IT IS ALL BUILDING ASPHALT, WHICH IS ONE OF THE ZONE FOR.
BUT ULTIMATELY THAT INFRASTRUCTURE IS GOING TO GET
TAXED.>> QUIET LITTLE SLEEPY TOWN WAKING UP.
>> 5 MILLION SQUARE SPACE IS NOT A MINOR THING.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I KIND OF LIKE THE QUIET AND SLEEPY.
BUT WE NEED THE GROWTH. >> IT IS A BALANCING ACT.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I WILL PUT UP WITH A. OLD BUT I WILL PUT UP WITH A. IT WAS POINTED OUT TO ME EARLIER TODAY THAT Ã I'M GOING TO CHANGE THE WORDING A LITTLE BIT.
OLDER PEOPLE HAVE A TENDENCY TO HAVE MORE DIFFICULTY WITH
YOU SHOULD JUST BUY ONE OF THOSE NICE BIG 50 FOOT RVS AND
GO ON THEROAD. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANY
OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? >> WITH ALL OF THESE NEW LARGE DEVELOPMENT IN SPACE, HAVE THESE DEVELOPERS GOTTEN TOGETHER WITH THE PROPER AUTHORITIES TO DEVELOP
WORKFORCE HOUSING? >> NOT THAT I AM AWARE WITH
THESE PROJECTS, AND NO. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANYTHING ELSE? I WILL OPEN TO THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING. ANYONE HERE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT? I KNEW YOU WERE.
>> MR. CHAIRMAN, COMMISSIONERS, GOODAFTERNOON.
ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT . I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THE LOCATION IS PERFECT FOR THIS PROJECT.
SPEAKING OF TRUCK ACCESS, THEY COME ON KINGS HIGHWAY AND ARE RIGHT HERE. 95 IS RIGHT THERE VERY CLOSE ON STATE ROAD 70. AND THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS THIS PROJECT IS BUILT. WE ALSO TRY TO MAKE THIS PROJECT A LITTLE DIFFERENT TO STAND UP FOR IT BOTH ARCHITECTURALLY AS YOU SAW IS VERY BEAUTIFUL.
WE ALSO PROVIDED IMMUNITY FOR EMPLOYEES.
WE HAVE GAZEBOS AND THE BENCHES AROUND THE LAKES.
AND ALSO, ON THE INTERIOR OF THE PROJECT THE ENTIRE ROADWAY SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR TRUCKS. USING THE COMPUTER SYSTEM PROGRAMS. WE GOT WITH DOT.
THE INTERSECTION OF WHITE AND KINGS HIGHWAY ORIGINALLY WAS LIMITED. ONLY LEFT TURNS.
WE WENT THROUGH DOT. THAT'S GOING TO BE A FULL ACCESS TO REVIEW WHEN THE WARRANTS ARE THERE WE ARE GOING TO INSTALL SIGNALS. ALSO PAVING THE ENTIRE WHITE ROAD IS OLDER NOTE NOW. WE ARE GIVING COUNTY 25 PETER RIGHT AWAY. WE ALSO PAVING PETERS ROAD IN CONJUNCTION TO OTHER PROJECTS WHICH ALSO HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY IN THEIR. SO WE ARE TRYING TO DO THE BEST THAT WE CAN TO MAKE IT A VERY NICE PROJECT FOR THE COMMUNITY AS WELL. AND OF COURSE THE JOBS THAT
BRING ALONG WITH IT. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: WE APPRECIATE THAT VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE
APPLICANT. >> WHEN DO YOU THINK YOU WILL
COME OUT OF THE GROUND? >> WE ARE HOPING END OF THE YEAR FOR PHASE 1. AND WE WERE JUST GIVEN THE GO-AHEAD FOR PHASE 2, WHICH HOPEFULLY WILL COME IN FRONT OF YOU.
>> THIS DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE APPROVAL, BUT I'M CURIOUS. HAVE YOU DONE PRE-LEASING? HAVE YOU LEAST CHUNKS OF THIS FACE?
>> I AM NOT AWARE OF IT, BUT I IMAGINE SINCE THE PHASE 2 IS COMING UP IT IS ALL A MATTER OF THE INTERNET AND ONLINE SALES.
THIS IS THE WAY IT'S GOING TO BE.
I WOULD SAY THE LAST 10 YEARS WE DID RETAIL ALL GOING TO BE WAREHOUSING, DISTRIBUTION, MEDICAL AND RESIDENTIAL.
THAT IS WITH THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IS GOING.
BUT I THINK THEY DO HAVE SOME IN MIND BECAUSE IT IS COMING AS WELL. THAT'S WHAT WE WERE TAUGHT.
>> THANK YOU. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANYTHING ELSE? THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.
[00:30:01]
ANYONE ELSE SPEAKING TO THIS PROJECT? I'M NOT SEEING ANYONE AND WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING. ANY FURTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD? NOT HEARING ANY I WILLENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> MOVE FOR APPROVAL WITH THE
>> MOTION BY MS. JOHNSON SCOTT FOR APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS,
SECOND BY MS. CLEMENS. >> MISS JOHNSON-SCOTT.> YOU.
>> MR. BRODERICK. >> YES.> CHAIRMAN
CREYAUFMILLER . >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM. MR. CRAGIN, YOU ARE STILL AT THE TABLE ON THE NEXT ITEM IS REALLY FOR MR. GILMORE, BUT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE NEXT ITEM?
[s. Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) - Surfside Quadruplex - Parcel ID: 2412-501-0132-000-3]
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: IS THAT OKAY WITH YOU MR. GILMORE? WE ARE GOING TO HEAR ITEM S AND THAT IS THE PRIMARY PLAT.
SURFSIDE QUAD PLEX PARCEL I'M TAKING S NEXT.
SURFSIDE QUAD PLEX PARCEL ID 2412 Ã501 Ã0132 Ã00 ÃTHREE.
IT WILL MAKE SENSE HERE IN JUST A MOMENT.
>> MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, BEFORE YOU WAS A SUBDIVISION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED ON SURFSIDE DRIVE.
IS APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH OPEN DRIVE AND SURFSIDE RENTAL PROPERTY IS A FUTURE LAND USE OF HIR, HUTCHINSON ISLAND RESIDENTIAL WITH THE ZONING OF MEDIUM ÃHUTCHINSON ISLAND. THE COOPER LIMITED PLAT AND COMMON AREA LANDSCAPING. STAFF IS OUR COMMITTING APPROVAL AS A PRELIMINARY PLAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOP STANDARDS WHICH GOVERNS THE HUTCHINSON AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 221 OF THE CITY CODE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IT DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, CONVENIENCE AND GENERAL WELFARE. ON-SCREEN IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT. IT HAS THE FOUR LOTS DIVVIED OUT THE REAL IT HAS A COMMON AREA FOR THE DUNE CROSSOVER, WHICH IS IN BETWEEN AND BETWEEN LOTS 2B AND 3B.
AND THEN THEY WILL ALSO HAVE THE LANDSCAPING WHICH WILL FLANK THE TWO SIDES OF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH. POSSIBLE ACTIONS OR TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH STAFF RECOMMENDING APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH 121 OF THE CITY CODE SHALL BE OBTAINED BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE. YOU CAN RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CHANGES OR ALTERNATE CONDITIONS AND RECOMMEND DISAPPROVAL.
AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR MR.
CRAGIN? >> THIS IS A PULMONARY PLAT BASICALLY DETAILING THE SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY.
ON THE COMMON AREA ACCESS DUNE CROSSOVER, TO CONFIRM BECAUSE WE HAVE THIS ISSUE DOWN THE STREET SEVERAL MONTHS AGO.
RELATIVE TO EACH UNIT BUILDING AND DUNE CROSSOVER.
SO ARE YOU INDICATING PROPERTY HAS BEEN INDICATED TO CREATE ONE DUNE CROSSOVER IN EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT WOULD NOT CREATE
THEIR OWN? >> THAT IS THE INTENT OF THE
FOLLOW-UP QUESTION TO THAT. WALKING THROUGH THE PROCESS OF HOW THE REST OF THIS GETS APPROVED.
>> IF IT GETS APPROVED BY YOU TONIGHT WILL GO ON TO THE CITY WILL SAY YES OR NO. IN THE APPLICANT WOULD BE INVITED TO SUBMIT THE FINAL PLAT TO THE CITY.
WOULD GO THROUGH TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WHERE OUR THIRD-PARTY SURVEY OR JIM ALEX WILL PROVE REVIEW THE PLAT.
IN MORE DETAIL ALONG WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ORGAN ONCE THEY HAVE GIVEN THE COMMENTS THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE TO ADDRESS THEIR COMMENTS. 111 SATISFIED WOULD BE SCHEDULED FOR CITY COMMISSION BECAUSE FINAL PLOTS GO TO COT.
>> ORIGINALLY THIS WAS GOING TO BE CONDITIONAL USE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION AS IT WAS EAST OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE.
BUT AS A VELOCITY COMMISSION MEETING THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED AN ORDINANCE CHANGE TO TAKE OUT THE CONDITIONAL USE PROCESS FOR ANYTHING THE CCL AND GO TO BUILDING PERMIT FOR
[00:35:05]
MOST THINGS. THIS IS GOING TO BE CONCERNING 1/4 PLUCKED. WE WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THEPLANNING MINUS I PLAN PROCESS. >> THEY ARE CONNECTED IN SOME
>> KIND OF LIKE TOWNHOUSES. >> ONE OF THE HOT BUTTON ISSUES THAT HAS COME UP IN THE LAST SEVERAL MEETINGS IS A SELF EACH OVERLAY, HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS. HOW IS THAT GOING TO BE ADDRESSED IF IT DOES NOT COME BACK TO THE PLANNING BOARD?
>> AS PART OF STEPS REVIEW WE ALWAYS ADDRESS ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WITHIN CITY CODE.
HEIGHT IS UP TO 45 FEET. 20 PERCENT FOR ANY ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND STAFF WILL REVIEW THAT.
>> IF THEY WERE LOOKING TO GET APPROVAL IT WILL HAVE TO COME BACK FOR A CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL?
>> THERE IS NO CONDITIONAL USES GRANTED.
ONLY IN THE ART 012 OR THREE. >> UNDER THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW. THIS REQUIRES A MINOR SITE PLAN NOTIFICATION, WHICH IS UNDER 4000.
WE ARE ALLOWED TO REVIEW THIS AND STAFF.
BUT SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES WE LOOK AT THESE ALSO DIRECT BUILDING PERMIT. WE CHECK FOR ALL COMPLIANCE WITH SETBACKS IN HEIGHT AND EVERYTHING.
>> IT IS A HOT BUTTON ISSUE OF THE.
I HEAR ABOUT OF THIS CONSTRUCTION CONTINUES EVERY WEEK RELATIVE TO THE HEIGHT ISSUES WILL BE HAVING A TUTORIAL ON THE SOMETIME IN THE NEAR FUTURE TO GET MORE UP TO SPEED ON THAT. JUST AS LONG.
IT IS NOT COMING BACK HERE. >> ARE LESS REGULAR MEETING WAS WHEN MR. THOMAS HELPED WITH THE PRESENTATION ON THE CHANGE BEING MADE TO CONDITIONAL USE I EXPLAINED IT VERY WELL THEN.
IT IS REALLY A FUNCTION OF TIME OF PERMITTING TO REVIEW AND TO ASSURE THAT ALL THE HEIGHT REGULATIONS IN THIS CASE THE
SOUTH BEACH OVERLAY. >> I JUST FEEL AS THOUGH, MAYBE I AM WRONG TO BEGIN MAYBE I AM THE ONLY ONE ON THE PLANNING BOARD THAT NEEDS THIS DEMYSTIFIED TO A CERTAIN EXTEN . THAT IS THE ONLY REASON I'M SUGGESTING WE WANT TO HAVE A PRESENTATION ON THIS IN MORE
DETAIL. >> I DO BELIEVE, IF I MAY, THE REASON FOR YOUR WANTING THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS WHEN MR. ATOMICS EXPLAINS, HE WAS EXPLAINING TRUCK STRUCTURE SEAWARD OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENFORCING THE BUILDING CODE.
PLANNING ROOMS REVIEW FOR HIGH. IS BASED ON FEMA FLOODPLAIN.
WHEREAS THE MAINLAND IT IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM.
WAS BROUGHT UP BY MR. THOMPSON'S IS THAT DEP IN THE STATE ALSO REGULATES THAT. AND SO SHOULD WE BE RE-EXAMINING HOW WE ARE BASING OUR HEIGHT ON FEMA.
SHOULD BE MORE IN LINE WITH DEP.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT A STAFF WE WERE ALSO THINKING THIS IS
SOMETHING WE SHOULD EXPLORE. >> THAT WAS THE EXACT QUESTION.
THOSE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE CHANGING CONTINUOUSLY.
THESE ARE GOING TO BE UPDATED ALL THE TIME.
>> FEMA DOESTOO BUT IT IS A DIFFERENT AGENCY.
>> THAT IS WHERE WE GET THIS CONFLICT BETWEEN OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT AND WHAT THEY ARE CONSIDERING .
THAT IS WHERE THE QUESTION MARK COMES IN HERE THAT IS CLEARLY THE REASON THERE IS A CONFLICT HERE.
I THINK WE NEED MORE DETAILED INFORMATION.
WALK US THROUGH THESPECIFICALLY .
>> I BELIEVE THERE IS A CHANGE. THIS WAS HAPPENING YEARS AGO EVEN AFTER HURRICANE ANDREW. I GREW UP IN SOUTH DADE WERE HURRICANE ANDREW. EVERYONE REBUILT THEIR HOMES BUT ONE OF MY NEIGHBORS. AND SO THEY HAD TO BASE IT ON THE FEMA FLOODPLAIN AND THEY HAD TO RACE EVERYTHING.
SO THEY WERE LIKE THE ONLY HOUSE THAT WAS ELEVATED.
AND SO THESE ARE THINGS THAT ARE GOING TO TAKE EFFECT ON HOW WE BUILD. WE HAVE A LOT OF VACANT LAND STILL ON OUR BEACHFRONT. A LOT OF THE HOMES ARE OLDER.
THEY WERE BUILT 34 YEARS AGO. AND IT WAS DIFFERENT THAN IT IS TODAY. AND IT IS FOREVER CHANGING.
[00:40:03]
>> I THINK MORE INFORMATION WOULD BE ADVISABLE.
>> I ASKED THIS TO MR. DREW TO TRY TO PUT SOMETHING TOGETHER AND COME BACK TO US WITH IT TO HELP EDUCATE US BETTER ON HOW THIS IS ALL DONE. I THINK AS TIME PERMITS, YOU ARE WORKING ON THAT AND UNDERSTAND WE ARE IN SEPTEMBER.
THIS IS THE END OF THE YEAR. BEFORE YOU BLINK AGAIN IT IS GONE. SO WE MAY OR MAY NOT SEE ANYTHING BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR.
BUT SHE IS WORKING ON PUTTING SOMETHING TOGETHER TO ADDRESS THAT AND HELP US OUT WITH IT AND TO HELP THE COMMUNITY UNDERSTAND IT BETTER. BECAUSE I THINK ALOT OF QUESTIONS COME OUT OF THE COMMUNITY AS THEY START TO SEE THESE PROJECTS GROW. GROW UP OUT OF THE GROUND ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY GO THAT IS A LOT TALLER.
I KNOW THAT YOU GET IT. I GET IT.
THE QUESTIONS, THAT IS. WE BE THAT OF.
ANYTHING ELSE? >> I SEE THAT THE PLAN IS TO RESERVE TO THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION THE SOUTH ÃI HAVE TO GET MY GLASSES ON. WHERE IT IS 10 FEET OR SOMETHING ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY.
THERE IS AN EXISTING CROSS OVER THERE.
ARE THERE BUILDER PLANS TO CONSTRUCT THE CROSSOVER ALONG THE SAME LINES AS THE EXISTING CROSSOVER?> NO MARIA THE CROSSOVER ON THIS, IF YOU CAN SEE LOT 2B AND 3B IT WILL BE IN
BETWEEN THOSE TWO LOTS. >> WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO THE EXISTING CROSSOVER ON THE SOUTH END OF THE PROPERTY.
>> I'M NOT AWARE OF AN EXISTING CROSSOVER.> IT IS THERE.
>> THE PROPERTY IS VACANT. >> I KNOW THE PROPERTY IS VACANT, BUT THERE IS AN EXISTING CROSSOVER WHICH SHOWS ON THE MAPS. SO WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE EXTRA AMOUNT OF LAND BEING WITHHELD ON THE SOUTH END OF THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY?
>> IF WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE 10 FOOT BUFFER THAT IS TO ALLOCATE FOR LANDSCAPING. CITY CODES IS A HAVE TO BE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES AND UP TO THE NORTH IS A SIX FOOT BUFFER BECAUSE THIS PROJECT RECENTLY RECEIVED VARIANCE APPROVAL TO BE SIX FEET FROM THE PROPERTY
SO THERE IS GOING TO BE A WALKWAY OF SOME KIND CONSTRUCTED ON THE AREA THAT IS NOT ON THE GRANITE LEDGE? IN OTHER WORDS, THAT IS GOING TO BE ON THE AO AREA RATHER
THAN THE X OWN, AM I CORRECT? >> IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT FLOOD ZONES, I WILL ADMIT I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FLOOD ZONE IS BUT WE DO HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE.
>> IT IS IN X ZONE. IT IS ON THE GRANITE LEDGE OVER THE QUESTION OF HEIGHTS AND SO FORTH IS MOVED.
THEY HAVE THE BEST DEAL ON THE ISLAND.> I KNOW FROM WORKING ON THE REPORT TO THE CITY THAT THE MAJORITY IS IN THE FLOOD ZONE, BUT THIS HAPPENS TO BE ONE OF THOSE LUCKY PROPERTIES.
>> VERY LUCKY. I AM JUST CONCERNED, DOES THE DEVELOPER INTEND TO HAVE SOME KIND OF DEED RESTRICTIONS OR ORDINANCE ABOUT REMOVING ANY OF THE FOLIAGE THAT IS IN THE DUNE
AREA? >> WE HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE TODAY. I WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO
FEEL THAT QUESTION TO HIM. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: JUST A MINUTE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. CRAGIN? NOT HEARING ANY I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING. IF THE APPLICANT WOULD PLEASE STEP FORWARD. IF YOU WOULD, PLEASE STATE YOUR
NAME AND ADDRESS AND SIGN IN. >> MY NAME IS WILLIAM STODDARD
1717 INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT MR. CRAGIN DIDN'T
COVER. >> NO, I THINK BRANDON COVERED EVERYTHING PERFECT FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.
[00:45:11]
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I THINK YOU HEARD MS. BAKER'S QUESTIONS. I WILL LET YOU GO AHEAD AND AN ATTEMPT TO ANSWER SOME OF THOSE.
>> WITH THIS PROJECT IT IS A QUADRO PLEX AND THERE WILL BE FEE SIMPLE OWNERSHIP. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE ASKING FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. THEY WILL OWN THE LAND UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING FOR YOU BUT ALL OF THE OTHER AREAS THAT ARE COMMON PROPERTY WOULD BE INCORPORATE IT IN SOME TYPE OF AN HOA, WHICH OF THE REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON WHAT THEY CAN AND CAN'T DO. AS FAR AS THE DUNE CROSSOVER, YOU ASKED ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION.
THE CONSTRUCTION IS SPECIFIED BY THE DEP ON THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THEY WANTED TO BE FRANGIBLE CONSTRUCTION, WOOD FRAME, MAXIMUM SIX FOOT WIDE, TWO FOOT ABOVE THE GRAY TO ALLOW ANY KIND OF VEGETATION TO GROW AROUND IT. SO ALL THOSE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS WILL BE SPECIFIED IN THE DEP.
AS FAR AS ANY ALTERATIONS OF VEGETATION ON THE DUNE, THAT IS ALL THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION THAT WOULD BE UNDER THE JURISDICTION. A COMMON GENERAL PERMANENT CONDITION IN ALL THE PERMITS ISSUED IS THAT THE EXOTIC PLANTS HAVE TO BE REMOVED. DEPENDING ON THE QUANTITY OF THEM, THEY MAY SPECIFY THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO BE REPLACED WITH NATIVE DUNE VEGETATION. BUT AS FAR AS CLEARING, THAT WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF STATE RULE IF THEY STARTED CLEARING
THE VEGETATION FOR THE DUNE. >> YOU WERE AWARE OF THE
EXISTING CROSSOVER. >> WHEN YOU BROUGHT THAT UP I LOOKED ON GOOGLE EARTH ON MY PHONE.
THERE IS A CROSSOVER, BUT THE CROSSOVER IS A SAND PATH BEING USED RIGHT NOW ON THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH.
IS NOT AN ELEVATED WOODEN STRUCTURE.
AND SO THAT STRUCTURE IS NOT ON OUR PROPERTY.
IF IT IS ON OUR PROPERTY WE HAVE NO INTENTION OF USING IT.
EVERYONE WILL BE USING AN ELEVATED STRUCTURE TO GET OVER
THE DUNE ONTO THE BEACH AREA. >> ARE YOU GOING TO RESTRICT
ACCESS? >> IT WOULD BE IN THE HOA DOCUMENTS THAT YOUR ACCESS IS PROVIDED THROUGH THE ELEVATED CROSSOVER STRUCTURE AS DEPICTED ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: IT WOULD NOT BE PUBLIC ACCESS.
>> RIGHT. I SEE IT ON THE AERIAL, BUT IS THAT PATH ENTIRELY ON OUR PROPERTY.
>> IT MEANDERS ONTO THE PROPERTY FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY. GOES ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
IT GOES FROM YOUR SOUTHERN PROPERTY OWNER.
>> IT'S A ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER.
>> IT ENDS UP ON YOUR PROPERTY. >> IS TECHNICALLY TRESPASSING
AT THAT POINT. >> I'M ASKING ARE YOU PLANNING
ON CLOSING IT OFF. >> WE WILL SEE HOW THE DEP ÃIF THEY WANT US TO REGURGITATE THAT AREA ON OUR PROPERTY THEY WOULD. BUT AS FAR AS WHAT THE NEIGHBOR HAS ON HIS PROPERTY, WE DON'T HAVE ANY CONTROL OVER THAT.
>> OKAY. BY THE WAY, GOOD FORTUNE
LANDING ON THE GRANITE RIDGE. >> IT IS VERY FORTUNATE.
>> IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
>> YOU SAY THERE IS GOING TO BE HOA INVOLVED IN THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT IN THE FUTURE. DO YOU ANTICIPATE YOUR DOCUMENTS TO LIMIT SHORT-TERM RENTALS?
>> I COULDN'T SPEAK OF THAT. THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING FOR THE
DEVELOPER. >> I KNOW HO A'S CAN LIMIT SHORT-TERM RENTALS. ELIMINATE THEM PRACTICALLY.
WONDERING IF AT THIS POINT YOU DON'T KNOW IF YOUR DOCUMENTS
WILL INCLUDE THAT. >> I AM NOT INVOLVED IN THE DRAFTING OF THE DOCUMENTS AND I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT SHORT-TERM RENTALS.> THAT WOULDN'T BE ANYTHING WE CAN
DISCUSS NOW, IS IT . >> WE SHOULD NOT BE ENTERING INTO DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING HOMEOWNER DOCUMENTS REGARDLESS.
THAT IS NOT IN OUR PURVIEW. >> ANYTHING ELSE? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. CRAGIN NOT HEARING ANY WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> WE HAVE AN APPROVAL ÃTHERE WERE NO CONDITIONS.PPROVAL FROM MS. BAKER AND A SECOND FROM MS. CLEMENS.
>> THERE IS ONE CONDITION. I MOVE APPROVAL WITH THE ONE
[00:50:02]
CONDITION. >> WE HAVE A MOTION WITH APPROVAL WITH ONE CONDITION IN THE SECOND MISSED JOHNSON ÃMS. CLEMENS. : ROLL CALL.
>> MS. JOHNSON-SCOTT. >> YES BUT MS. BAKER.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM.
THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT WAS TIMELY COMING IN FOR THIS MEETING AFTER LAST MONTH'S MEETING.
BECAUSE IT DRAWS COMPLETE ATTENTION TO WHY THE CHANGE
NEEDED TO BE MADE. >> I AGREE, SIR.
>> MS. BAKER, THIS IS WHY I MADE THE LAST-MINUTE CHANGE AND MOVED US UP WAS BECAUSE MR. GILMORE IS PRESENTING THE ONE SINGLE ITEM THAT IS LEFT ON THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING.
AND I DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE AN UP AND DOWN JACK-IN-THE-BOX GOING
[r. Development and Design Review - Ft Pierce Self Storage - 481 Ohio Avenue]
WE ARE ITEM ARGUMENT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW FORT PIERCE SELF STORAGE AT 481 OHIO AVENUE.IF YOU REMEMBER SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, THIS ADDRESS CAME TO US
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING. >> ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE.
>> AND IT SHOWED AT THAT TIME A PROPOSED STORAGE FACILITY AND NOW THEY ARE BACK WITH THE ACTUAL DOCUMENTATION.
>> I'M GLAD YOU SAT THERE LOOKED AT MELIKE I HAD TWO
HEADS . >> GOOD AFTERNOON PLANNING BOARD AND CHAIRMAN. BEFORE YOU AS A CONDITIONAL USE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR FORT PIERCE STORAGE FACILITY TO BE LOCATED AT 41 OHIO AVENUE.
IT IS APPROXIMATELY 2.65 ACRES AND TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OHIO AVENUE JUST TO THE WEST OF POPEYES RESTAURANT IN WALGREENS. SO IT PROPERTY HAS A FUTURE LAND USE OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITH A ZONING OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL. THE SITE PLAN WILL CONSIST OF FIVE STRUCTURES WITH APPROXIMATELY 217 SMALL STORAGE UNITS. WILL ALSO INCLUDE THE COLLECTION AREA. THE SITE WILL ALSO BE RESTRICTED BY GATE ACCESS WITH A KEY ENTRY.
THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING ADEQUATE LANDSCAPING FOR THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO INSTALL 39 TREES AND 50 POEMS. BEFORE YOU IS AN ELEVATION AS FAR AS FOR THE DESIGN OF WHAT THE FIVE BUILDINGS WILL LOOK LIKE.
IT WILL INCLUDE A PITCHED ROOF, METAL BUILDING DESIGN, COLOR SCHEME OF GRAY WITH ROYAL BLUE ACCENTS FOR THE ROOF AND THE DOORS. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH TWO CONDITIONS FOR THE COMPLETION CERTIFICATION BY LAND SCAPE ARCHITECT YVONNE PURSUANT TO CITY CODE SECTION 123 ÃSIX SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS APPROVED FOR THE SITE.
AND NUMBER TWO PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY SITE CLEARING PERMITS THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A TREATMENT AGGREGATION SURVEY AND COORDINATE WITH FORT PIERCE FOR THE REQUIRED FOR THE REGULATED TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED AS SITES DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PLANNING BOARD HAS THE FOLLOWING POSSIBLE ACTIONS. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN REVIEW NO CHANGES. RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CHANGES OR DISAPPROVAL. IN HERE YOU GO.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. GILMORE?
>> YES. MR. GILMORE, AT ONE TIME THERE USED TO BE A RESTRICTION AGAINST HAVING METAL BUILDINGS IN THE CITY. HAS THAT BEEN REMOVED?
>> NOT THAT I KNOW OF THE REAGAN WE HAVE APPROVED PUBLIC STORAGES BEFORE METAL BUILDING .
>> THIS WIL REQUIRE IT GOING TO THE BUILDING PROCESS TO MAKE
SURE. >> SOLAR IS NO LONGER THE RESTRICTION ABOUT HAVING A CONSTRICTION OF METAL BUILDINGS
[00:55:02]
>> I HAVE NOT HEARD OF THAT. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: WE HAVE METAL BUILDINGS ALL OVER THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE.
>> WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RESTRICTION.
>> I DID NOT KNOW WE HAD A RESTRICTION.
>> WE USE TO. >> I THINK IT WAS DISCOURAGED.
BUT WE HAVE SEVERAL WAREHOUSES THAT WERE ALL OVER.
>> WHEN WE HAD A BUILDING ON THE OLD FARMER'S MARKET, THERE IS AN ARGUMENT THAT THEY COULD NOT BUILD A METAL BUILDING OR BECAUSE THE RESTRICTION UNLESS IT WAS FRONTED LIKE IT WASN'T
>> I UNDERSTAND IT IS METAL. BUT THERE IS A RESTRICTION IN THE BUILDING CODE AT ONE TIME THAT ANY OF METAL BUILDING HAD TO BE FACED WITH A SUBSTANCE THAT MADE IT LOOK LIKE IT
WASN'T A METAL BUILDING. >> IT MAY BE THE STORAGE CONTAINERS OF YOUR MOVE A SECTION UNDER UNDER COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL THAT HAD TO BE LANDSCAPED.
>> STORAGE CONTAINERS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
MY MEMORY IS UNFORTUNATE. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I RECALL WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THERE AT MARKET.
THAT PARTICULAR BUILDING DID HAVE A FAC'ADE ON THE FRONT OF
IT. >> HAD A FAC'ADE TO MAKE IT LOO LIKE IT WASN'T A METAL BUILDING.
AND I'M JUST WONDERING WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT REGULATION.
> THERE WERE SEVERAL RIGHT ALONG THE ROAD ON THE SAME WAY.
>> I BELIEVE I WAS HERE. THINK THEY HAD THE ADDED ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENT, WHICH WAS BASICALLY THE PORCH.
THIS BE IN COMMERCIAL DOESN'T REALLY FIT IT.
AND ACTUALLY THE FIRST RENDERING THEY SUBMITTED TO THE FLAT ROOF SO I SUGGESTED A PITCHED ROOF.
>> THE FARMERS MARKET WAS A FRUIT STAND.
THAT WAS COMMERCIAL ALSO. I DON'T MEAN TO SAY WHAT IS BEING DONE. OF MY MEMORY SERVES ME RIGHT, REQUIRED AT ONE TIME EVEN ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS A FAC'ADE TO MAKE IT NOT LOOK LIKE A METAL BUILDING.
NOW, THAT MAY HAVE CHANGED. IT MAY HAVE BEEN DROPPED SOMEWHERE ALONG THE LINE OR ELIMINATED THE REAGAN BUT I
DON'T REMEMBER THAT HAPPENING. >> YOU JOGGED MY MEMORY.
PRETTY SHARP THERE CAN. ANYTHING ELSE SO YOU LOOK AT IT AGAIN AND WE WILL ALSO BE LOOKED AT AT PERMITTING.
ANYTHING ELSE. >> I HAVE A QUESTION.
COULD YOU GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN? THIS IS A QUICK ONE. LOOKING AT THESE PLANS, WHAT IS THE PERIMETER SECURITY FEATURE? BUILDING A WALL, CHAIN-LINK FENCE? ANYTHING?
>> THERE WILL BE A SECURE FENCE OR WALL THAT WOULD BE REVIEWED IN A BUILDING PERMIT STAGE. THEY HAVEN'T STATED IF IT WOULD BE A FENCE OR A WALL THAT THEY KNOW OF.
BUT I CAN TELL YOU THEY CAN'T DO IT CHAIN-LINK FENCE ALONG
OHIO. >> THAT'S WHERE I WAS GOING WITH THIS. YOU WANT TO SEE CHAIN LINK HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF FEET OF IT.
>> AND PLANNING REVIEW REVIEWS OFFENSES THAT COMES IN.
>> THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THEIR SITE PLAN CURRENTLY?
>> NO. >> WOULD HAVE TO BE PRIOR.
>> IT REQUIRES A SEPARATE BUILDING PERMIT.
>> PRIOR TO COMING OUT OF. >> IN ORDER TO GET A BUILDING PERMIT PLANNING TO SIGN OFF ON THE FENCE.
AND WE DO HAVE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR IN A DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON
CERTAIN ROADWAYS. >> A SPLIT BLOCK AND THINGS OF THIS NATURE, WHICH IS FAIRLY COMMON NO.
>> YOU DID INDICATE THERE WOULD BE SOME KIND OF ACCESS.
THERE WILL BE SOME SORT OF OPENING THAT TENDS TO LEAD TO BELIEVE THERE WILL BE SOMETHING MORE ELABORATE.
>> A GATED OPENING. I'M JUST NOT A BIG FAN OF PUTTING UP HUNDREDS OF FEET OF CHAIN-LINK FENCE.
>> WE ARE DEFINITELY NOT FENCING THAT AT ALL.
>> THANK YOU. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANYTHING ELSE? IS THE APPLICANT HERE? PLEASE COME FORWARD. I AM OPENING THE PUBLIC PORTION
[01:00:13]
OF THE MEETING, BY THE WAY. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME ANDADDRESS AND SIGN IN. >> TONY, ALCON ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 1449 E-COMMERCE CENTER.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO
ADD? >> WE HAVE CALLED OUT ON OUR SITE PLAN FOR THE FENCE WILL EITHER BE VINYL OR WOOD.
AND THERE'S GOING TO BE LANDSCAPING OUTSIDE OF THE FENCE. SO IT IS NOT GOING TO BE
CHAIN-LINK FENCE. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I DIDN'T NOTICE THAT ON THE SITE PLAN THAT I LOOKED AT.
>> HOW HIGH WILL DEFENSE BE? >> I BELIEVE SIX FEET.
ON THE PERIMETER AND SAYS PROPOSED SIX FOOT VINYL OR WOODEN FENCE. WAS ONE OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS WE MADE SURE TO ADD THAT.
>> THE BUILDINGS WOULD NOT BE VISIBLE FROM OHIO STREET?
>> VERY LITTLE, IF AT ALL. >> OKAY.
MAYBE THAT'S WHY THE THING ABOUT HAVING IT NOT LOOK LIKE A METAL BUILDING DOESN'T APPLY? THEY HAVE TO BE VISIBLE.
OKAY. YOU ESCAPED HAVING TO PUT A
FAC'ADE ON IT. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
>> I'M GOING TO COME BACK TO THE FENCE ISSUE ONE MORE TIME.
IF THEY ARE GOING TO BE CHOOSING TO GO WITH WOOD FENCE, THEY HAVE TWO OPTIONS. BOARD ON BOARD OR SHADOWBOX.
'M NOT A FAN OF EITHER ONE, HONESTLY.
IF AN OPTION WAS TRULY FOR VINYL IT IS AN UPGRADE TO FORM WOOD. WE HAD THIS DISCUSSION ON OTHER PROJECTS IN TOWN WERE ULTIMATELY THEY DIDN'T GO WITH AN UPGRADED PRODUCT AND THEY USED A BOARD ON BOARD ENCLOSURE. THERE IS ONE INFAMOUSLY OVER ON ORANGE WERE THEY CONSTRUCTED THAT CELLULAR TOWER.
IN THE ENCLOSURE, IN MY OPINION, LOOKS ATROCIOUS.
IT IS TRULY A CASE OF A BAD DECISION BEING MADE.
SO I WAS JUST GOING TO SUGGEST TO CONSIDER THE VINYL.S A MATTER OF FACT, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT ON A MOTION TO APPROV THAT THE VINYL FENCING WOULD BE UTILIZED VERSUS FUNDS.
BUT THAT COULD BE OUT OF OUR DOMAIN HERE .
>> YOU CAN PUT IT AS A CONDITION SO THAT WE MAKE SURE THAT IS WHAT IS CHOSENWHEN THEY COME IN FOR AN BUILDING PERMIT
. >> THE OTHER PROBLEM IS IT REQUIRES CONTINUANCE MAINTENANCE AND THEY DON'T GET MAINTAINED. I'M NOT CRITICIZING YOUR DEVELOPMENT, BUT HAPPEN TO FALL INTO A STATE OF DISREPAIR.
>> YOU ARE JUST THE ENGINEER. IS NOT INVOLVED IN THE
MAINTENANCE ONLY PACKET. >> ALL RIGHT.
THEN I WANT BLOCK. AND I WANT IT 12 FEET HIGH.
>> AND HE WANTS HIS MURAL ON IT TOO.
>> ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND THERE IS NO ONE ELSE HERE TODAY TO SPEAK SO I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING AND COME BACK. ANY FURTHER COMMENTS TO MR. GILMORE? NOT HEARING ANY I WILL
ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I WILL MAKE THE MOTION HERE BECAUSE I DO WANT TO INCLUDE THAT VINYL FENCING.
I WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL BASED ON STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS AND I WOULD ADD 1/3 RECOMMENDATION THAT VINYL FENCING ACCEPTABLE TO PLANNING AND BUILDING WOULD BE THE
MATERIAL THAT IS UTILIZED. >> SECOND.
>> MOTION FOR MR. BRODERICK TO INCLUDE THE TWO ITEMS FROM STAFF AND TO ADD HIS FENCE COMMENTS.
AND A SECOND BY MS. BAKER. CALLED ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
>> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM. AND YOU STILL DOING OKAY ON
[a. Annexation - Privilege South - 2111 Dade Road, 2002 and 2140 Bell Avenue and TBD Lots (6 Parcels)]
>> WE WILL SWAP SEATS HERE. ANNEXATIONS.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: THE NEXT ITEM OF BUSINESS IS ITEM 6 A.
MR. CRAGIN WILL BE THE PRESENTER ON THIS ITEM.
AND IT IS ANNEXATIONS OF 21 UNLEAVENED DADE ROAD 2002 AND 2140 AND TBD LOTS. SIX PARCELS.
[01:05:05]
NOW, GO ON AND EXPLAIN THIS TO ME.>> I WILL COVER THIS ONE ANNEXATION BECAUSE WE RECEIVED THIS VIA AN APPLICATION AND THEN REBECCA WILL GO AHEAD AND COVER THE REST OF THE ANNEXATIONS AND I WILL CONTROL THE POWERPOINT SLIDE. GOOD EVENING OR GOOD AFTERNOON APPEARED BEFORE YOU WE HAVE A APPLICATION OR ANNEXATION FOR A PROPERTY KNOWN AS PRIVILEGE SOUTH FOR THE CULMINATION OF SIX DIFFERENT PROPERTIES. THE SIX PROPERTIES ARE ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH 25TH STREET TO THE NORTH SIDE OF BELL AVENUE, THE WEST SIDE OF SUNRISE BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DADE ROAD. ALL SIX OF THE PROPERTIES HAVE A ST. LUCIE COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE RESIDENTIAL URBAN 5 BILLION IS AN ACRE AND THEN IT WILL BE GIVEN OUR FUTURE LAND USE OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. ALL SIX OF THE PROPERTIES OF A COUNTY ZONING OF AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL ONE DWELLING UNIT IN ACRE OR ONE. ONCE ANNEXED IT WILL BE GIVEN OUR ZONING DISTRICT OF SINGLE-FAMILY AS WE DON'T HAVE AGRICULTURAL ZONES WITHIN THE CITY.
AS PROPOSING ANNEXATION MEETS THE CENTERS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SPECIFICALLY POLICY SECTION 1.11 REGARDING ANNEXATION FROM PLANNING STATUS OR COMMITTING APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION FOR POSSIBLE ACTIONS BY THE PLANNING BOARDOR TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND STATUS ARE COMMITTING APPROVAL OR YOU CAN RECOMMEND DISAPPROVAL.
AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: CAN YOU ROLL THIS BACK ONTO THE AERIAL VIEW, PLEASE . WE KNOW OF ANY OF THESE PROPERTIES IMMEDIATELY AROUND THE TWO PROPERTIES THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED IF ANY OF THE EXISTING PROPERTIES AROUND THOSE TWO PIECES OF PROPERTY ARE WITHIN THE CITY
LIMITS? >> NO GRID EVERYWHERE YOU SEE COLOR ON THE NORTHERN PART REDUCE YELLOW AND ARE FOR, THAT WOULD BE THE CITY LIMITS AND ANYWHERE YOU DON'T SEE A SPECIFIC COLOR AND A TAG IS NOT IN THE CITY LIMITS.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: OKAY. IT ALWAYS AMAZES ME DRIVING AROUND FORT PIERCE HOW MANY PROPERTIES YOU WOULD THINK ARE IN FORT PIERCE. I UNDERSTAND THAT IS WHAT THESE EXERCISES ARE ALL ABOUT AND TRYING TO SLVE THOSE ISSUES.
BUT IT'S STILL AMAZES ME. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANY
OTHER QUESTIONS? >> TO ANY OF THESE PROPERTIES
HAVE AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION? >> NOTTHAT I AM AWARE OF .
>> THANK YOU. >> BRANDON, ONLY TRANSFER ZONING COMING INTO THE CITY, YOU MENTIONED THE COUNTY ZONING REQUIREMENTS ARE ONE UNIT PER ACRE.
IS THE E1 ZONING DESIGNATION SIMILAR TO THAT?
>> THAT IS BASICALLY SINGLE-FAMILY ONE DWELLING
UNIT. >> IT IS VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL?
>> YES.> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? NOT HEARING ANY I WOULD OPEN UP TO THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING.
BUT WE HAVE NO PUBLIC. SO I WILL COME BACK TO MR. CRAGIN. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> THAT IS ALL. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I WOULD
ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> MR. CHAIR, MOVE FOR
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: WEHAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY MS. JOHNSON-SCOTT, SECOND BY MS. CLEMONS.
>> YES.> MS. JOHNSON-SCOTT. >> YOU.
>> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER . >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM. NO, WE HAVE MULTIPLES HERE.
I AM GOING TO DO TWO THINGS. I AM GOING TO ALLOW MS. GUERRERO TODETERMINE HOW SHE WANTS TO PRESENT IT .
AND I WILL ALLOW HER TO IDENTIFY ALL OF THESE PARCELS AND LOTS. BECAUSE I'M LAZY.
NOW FOR SPEEDY AND SOME TIME, I THINK THAT WOULD BE THE QUICKEST WAY TO DO THAT. I WOULD LIKE THE BOARD TO FULLY UNDERSTAND WE WILL HAVE A MOTION FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY REGARDLESS OF HOW SHE PRESENTS.
>> I CAN DO ONE BETTER FOR YOU. WE CAN HAVE A MOTION FOR EACH ONE OF THE ITEMS WHICH HAS MULTIPLE PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH IT.WHEN IT GOES TO THE CITY COMMISSION, HOWEVER, THEY WILL HAVE TO VOTE INDIVIDUALLY ON A. BUT YOU HAVE THE LUXURY TO TAKE THEM AS I HAVE LISTED THEM BECAUSE THERE IS A RATIONAL NEXUSBETWEEN THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTIES AND
REQUEST . >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: OKAY.
WE WILL DO A MOTION FOR D AND C AND SO ON AND SO ON.
>> WHAT YOU WILL DO IS READ OUT THREE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS FOR THE ADDRESS AND MAKE YOUR MOTION.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: OKAY. VERY GOOD.
[b. Two (2) Voluntary Annexations - 3420 and 3450 Sunrise Boulevard]
>> REBECCA, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HERE TO PRESENT UNDER NEW BUSINESS ITEMS 6B THROUGH SIX AND AS IN
[01:10:02]
NO. BUT HOPEFULLY YOU SAY YES.IS A 29 VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS AND BY VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS I MEAN TWOFOLD. FIRST BY THE NOMENCLATURE VOLUNTARY. THESE ARE NOT IN VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS. SECONDLY, THESE VOLUNTARY INNOCENTS THEY EACH SIGNED AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES AND AS A RESULT OF SIGNING THOSE AGREEMENTS THEY VOLUNTARILY AGREED TO ANNEXED INTO THE CITY ONCE THOSE PROPERTIES BECAME RIPE FOR ANNEXATION. SO WE ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH THE GROUPINGS AS I LISTED THEM ON THE STAFF REPORTS AND ALSO ON THE AGENDA. AND SO THE FIRST TWO ARE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SUNRISE BOULEVARD, SPECIFICALLY 3420 AND 3450 SUNRISE BOULEVARD.
AS YOU CAN SEE THERE ARE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON EACH OF THE LOTS. NEXT SLIDE.
HERE WE HAVE THREE PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AVENUE Q LOCATED AT 3704, 2908 AND 3120 AVENUE Q. AGAIN, EACH ONE OF THESE PROPERTIES HAS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON THEM.THE NEXT THREE ANNEXATIONS ARE ON EITHER SIDE OF FOREST PLACE, THAT IS ON THE WEST AND EAST SIDE OF FOREST PLACE. AS YOU CAN SEE BY THE ILLUSTRATION, THEY TOO HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES AT 2905 AND 2906 AND 2910 FOREST PLACE.
THE SERIES OF ANNEXATIONS EXIST ON EDGE RAILROAD ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE SPECIFICALLY IN 1906 AND 2002 AND UNADDRESSED PARCEL PARIS THROUGH THE PROPERTIES OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON THEM. ONE IS VACANT.
BUT BOTH THE PROPERTIES TOGETHER ARE OWNED BY THE SAME APPLICANT. THAT VACANT CROSS PIECE OF PROPERTY DOES NOT HAVE AN AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION TO BE THE NEXT TO ANNEXATIONS ARE ON THE WEST AND EAST SIDE OF APPLE STREET SPECIFICALLY AT 2803 THREE BOTH OF THEM HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON THEM.
THIS IS A HARD MAP TO DO. THEY ALL EXIST ON SOUTH US HIGHWAY ONE SO YOU HAVE PROPERTIES ON THE WEST AND EAST SIDE OF US HIGHWAY ONE. THE PROPERTY TO THE MOST NORTHERN ON THE MAP IS A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY.
THE TWO UNDERNEATH IT TO THE SOUTH ARM BOTH INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES. ALL THREE ARE DEVELOPED.
I'M SORRY, THEY ARE LOCATED AT 21 3957 SOUTH US HIGHWAY ONE.
HEAR THE NEXT TWO ARE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF KIRBY LOOP ROAD AT 4653 AND 4681. BOTH HAVE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON THEM.THESE TWO PROPERTIES LOCATED ON SOUTH MARKET AVENUE ON THE SOUTH SIDE 427 AND 601 OR BOTH INDUSTRIAL SITES AND THEY ARE BOTH DEVELOPED WITH INDUSTRIAL USES.
THE FOUR PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COPENHAGEN ROAD ARE ALL DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON THEM, SPECIFICALLY AT 1720, 1716, 1840 AND 1998 COPENHAGEN ROAD. NOW WE HAVE INDIVIDUAL ANNEXATIONS THAT STAND ON THEIR OWN.THIS ONE AT 505 MIDWAY ROAD. THAT HOUSE IS HIDDEN BACK THERE BUT IT IS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE.
IT DOES HAVE A ZONING, IT WILL HAVE A ZONING OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL BUT IT IS A LEGAL NONCONFORMING USE AND THERE IS A FAMILY THAT CURRENTLY LIVES IN THAT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. 2835 MCNEIL ROAD IS A NORTH SIDE HAS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED ON IT.
3005 SUMMIT STREET ON THE WEST SIDE ALSO HAS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED ON IT. AND FINALLY, I THINK, 4119 OLEANDER AVENUE HAS ON THE WEST SIDE A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE.
SO THESE 29 VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS FOR STATE STATUTE FOLLOW THE DICTATES OF HOW THE STATE DESIGNATES CONTINUITY AND ADJACENCY. ALL OF THEM ARE CONTINUOUS TO CITY-OWNED OR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS.
[01:15:02]
OR ACROSS FROM ON A RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH IS COUNTED WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF CONTINUOUS NESTS.THEY ARE ALL REASONABLY COMPACT AND THEY BEAR THE SIGNATURES, THE PETITION BEARS THE SIGNATURES OF ALL THE OWNERS ON THE AGREEMENTS I TALKED ABOUT EARLIER.
THE ORDINANCE ADOPTED FOLLOWS THE DUE PROCESS AND NOTICE WHICH YOU WILL SEE ON THE NEXT PAGE.
SO NOTICES TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND ALL CURRENT PROPERTY OWNERS WILL BE MAILED ON SEPTEMBER 20 FOR THE LOCAL AGREEMENT REQUIRES NOTIFICATION TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, BUT THERE IS NO NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
WE GO AHEAD AND DO THAT ANYWAY TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY KNOW THEY ARE GOING TO BE IMMINENTLY BROUGHT INTO THECITY LIMITS SO THERE ARE NO SURPRISES EVEN THOUGH TECHNICALLY THEY SIGNED AN AGREEMENT . THE PLANNING BOARD THE ONLY REQUIREMENT IS A QUALIFIED JUDICIAL HEARING FOR THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE ONLY ACTION THEY CAN RECOMMEND IS TO FORWARD OR NOT TO FORWARD. YOU CAN'T CHANGE THE ZONING OR THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE. AT LEAST TWO APPLICATIONS WITH THE MAP MUST BE DONE WITHIN A TWO WEEK CONSECUTIVE WEEK FASHION FOR THOSE WILL BEDONE IN OCTOBER 3 AND OCTOBER 10 FOR THE TWO READINGS OF THE ORDINANCE WILL BE DONE ON 1018 AND 11 ONE. AND THE ANNEXATION ORDINANCE WILL BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY AS WELL AS THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE WITHIN SEVEN DAYS OF THE APPROVAL FROM CITY COMMISSION. AGAIN, WE WILL SEND CERTIFIED NOTICES TO ALL CURRENT PROPERTY OWNERS ON NOVEMBER 5, EVEN THOUGH THERE IS NO NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR STATE STATUTE BUT THESE HOMEOWNERS WILL RECEIVE TWO NOTIFICATIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY STATE STATUTE TO MAKE SURE THEY KNOW WHAT IS COMING AND SO THEY WILL KNOW WHAT IS DONE.
THE ACTION REQUESTED IS TO RECOMMEND THE 29 PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CITY COMMISSION, SPECIFICALLY ITEMS 6B.
THIS INCLUDE CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE
FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANY QUESTIONS BUT THIS DOES NOT HAVE TO GO BEFORE THE CITY
COMMISSION, AM I CORRECT. >> IT DOES.
ONLY THE CITY COMMISSION CAN APPROVE.
>> THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE A QUALIFIED JUDICIAL HEARING TODAY ACCORDING TO WHAT DID YOU SAY? BUT NONE OF US, NO ONE HAS HAD TO BE SWORN IN?
>> WHEN I PUT DOWN A QUASI JUDICIAL HEARING IT HAS TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING AND A HEARING ALLOWS FOR FOLKS TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE TESTIMONY AND BE SWORN IN IF THEY SPEAK.
THANK YOU. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: IT IS A LITTLE ODD BECAUSE WE HAVE NO ONE IN THE AUDIENCE.
AND WE COULD HAVE SWORN IN OUR PRESENTERS.
BUT AGAIN, BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONE IN THE AUDIENCE.
>> AND IT IS A VALID QUESTION. WHEN THEY GO TO CITY COMMISSION WE GIVE THEM NO NOTIFICATION, THEY MAY COME IN.
I'M SURE THAT PROCESS WILL BE FOLLOWED TO 18 AT CITY
COMMISSION. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES.O
IT IS A LITTLEODD . >> QUESTION.>>FRANK
CREYAUFMILLER: YES, SIR. >> YOU MENTIONED THE TIME PERIOD OF WHEN THEY ARE GOING TO FLOW THROUGH THE PROCESS.
WHAT WILL THE EFFECTIVE DATE BE OF THE ANNEXATION?
WILL IT BE THIS CALENDAR YEAR? >> JANUARY ONE OF 2022.
>> THEY WILL NOT HAVE TO PAY CITY TAXES ON THE LAND.
>> IT WILL BE EFFECTIVE IN 2022.
WE THOUGHT IT WAS FAIR THAT WA .
>> OKAY. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS? >> I AM GLAD TO HEAR THAT YOU ARE NOTIFYING, I WILL: PROPERTY OWNERS.
I LOOKED AT THE DAYS THEY SIGNED THEIR COMMITMENT TO REA SOME IN THE EARLY TO THOUSANDS .
THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING OF A SURPRISE AS A HOMEOWNER EVEN THOUGH I SIGNED SOMETHING IN 2006, I WOULDN'T KNOW COME
2021. >> IT IS A POLICY OF THE DEPARTMENT. WE ARE NOT REQUIRED BY STATE STATUTE, BUT THEY SHOULD BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST AT THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF WHAT IS COMING AND WHAT HAS
HAPPENED. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT, THOUGH. AND ANNEXATION THAT WE DID WITHIN THE LAST COUPLE YEARS ON 25TH STREET.
AND IT INTERESTED ME. BECAUSE SOMEHOW THE NOTICE WAS NOT SENT OUT FOR THIS MEETING FOR HIM BUT THE PROPERTY OWNER DISCOVERED IT WAS GOING TO BE HEARD IN OUR MEETING AND HE IS SENT AN ATTORNEY. AND THE YOUNG ATTORNEY STOOD HERE AT THE PODIUM AND SAID HE COULDN'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE WERE IN SUCH A RUSH TO ANNEX IT. AND WHEN I CONFIRMED, IT WAS MS. CAREER REPRESENTING. WHEN WAS THE AGREEMENT SIGNED 17 YEARS EARLIER. SO IT DIDN'T SEEM TO ME THERE WAS ANY HASTE. BUT I'M SURE AFTER 718 YEARS IT
[01:20:03]
WAS A SURPRISE. SO YOUR POINT IS WELL TAKEN.>> AS TO WHETHER OR NOT YOU WANT TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE
CITY. >> YOU HAVE TO DO IT IN ORDER
COULD THOUGHT ABOUT CHANGING YOUR MIND BEFORE YOU TODAY.
WE WILL BEGIN WITH ITEM BE. AND YOU WANT ME TO READ THEM
IN? >> SOMEONE WHO MAKES THE MOTION CAN MAKE THE MOTION AND READ IT AS PART OF THE MOTION.
>> I WILL LET THE MOTION MAKERS DO THIS.
>> FOR PROCEDURAL, SHOULD WE OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I GUESS WE SHOULD. IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN THE EMPTY SEATS? IS THERE ANYONE IN THE EMPTY
SEATS THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? >> ON ANY OF THE ANNEXATIONS?
>> NOT EVEN THE CASPER? I WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC PORTION OF THE MEETING. ALL RIGHT.
I WILL DO THIS DIFFERENTLDIY. ITEM BE.
THERE ARE TWO VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS A 3420 AND 3450 SUNRISE BOULEVARD. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> MOVE FOR APPROVAL. >> SECOND.
>> MS. JOHNSON SCOTT? MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL.
SECOND BY MS. CLEMENTS. >> MS. CLEMONS.
[c. Three (3) Voluntary Annexations - 2704, 2908, and 3120 Avenue Q]
>> YOU> MS. JOHNSON-SCOTT. >> YOU.
>> MS. BAKER.> YES . >> GERMANCREYAUFMILLER .
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM.
ITEM 6C, THREE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS 2704, 2908, 3920 AVENUE Q WHAT I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> MR. CHAIR, I MOVE FOR APPROVAL.
>> SECOND. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS. CLEMONS MAKES A MOTION FOR APPROVAL, MS. BAKER SECONDS.
[d. Three (3) Voluntary Annexations - 2905, 2906, and 2910 Forest Place]
>> MR. BRODERICK. >> YOU.> MS.JOHNSON-SCOTT.
>> GERMAN CREYAUFMILLER . >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM. ITEM 6D.
THREE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS 2905, 2906, 2910 FOREST PLACE.
I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> MOVE APPROVAL.
>> SECOND. >> MS. BAKER MAKES THE MOTION FOR APPROVAL, SECOND MS. JOHNSON-SCOTT.
CALL THE ROLL CALL.> MR. BRODERICK.
[e. Four (4) Voluntary Annexations - 1906, 1909, and 2002 Edgevale Road and an unaddressed parcel generally located at the northwest corner of Edgevale Road and Admiral Street]
>> YOU.> MS. JOHNSON-SCOTT. >> YOU.
>> MS. BAKER.> YOU. >> MS. CLEMONS.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS 1906, 1909 AND 2020 AND JILL AVENUE. AN ADDRESS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST OF RIDGEVILLE ROAD AND AT WALL STREET. WOULD
ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> MOVE FOR APPROVAL.
>> SECOND. >> MS. JOHNSON SCOTTMOVES FOR
[f. Two (2) Voluntary Annexations - 2803 and 2830 Admiral Street]
APPROVAL.> MS. CLEMONS SECONDS.CALLED THE ROLL, PLEASE. >> MS. JOHNSON SCOTT.
>> YES.> MR. BURGESS WERE JUST .
>> GERMAN MILLER . >> YES, MA'AM.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: 6F, TWO VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS.
2803, 28 30 ADMIRAL STREET. >> I MOVE APPROVAL.> SECOND.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS. BAKER MOVES FOR APPROVAL, MS.
[g. Three (3) Voluntary Annexations - 3921, 3957, and 5560 South US Highway 1]
>> YES. >> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MEMBER AND 3929, 3957 AND 5560 S. US HIGHWAY ONE. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> MOVE FOR APPROVAL. >> SECOND.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS. CLEMONS MOVES FOR APPROVAL, MS.
[h. Two (2) Voluntary Annexations - 4653 and 4681 Kirby Loop Road ]
BAKER SECONDS. >> MS. CLEMONS.
>> MR. BRODERICK. >> YOU.> MS. JOHNSON SCOTT.
>> YES.> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM.
ITEM 6H, TWO VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS.
4653 AND 4681 KIRBY LOOP ROAD. I WOULD ENTERTAI A MOTION.>
[i. Two (2) Voluntary Annexations - 427 and 601 South Market Avenue]
[01:25:06]
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS. JOHNSON SCOTT MOVES FOR APPROVAL, MS. CLEMONS SECOND. CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE.
>> MS. BAKER.> YES. >> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES MA'AM.
TWO VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS FOR 27 AND 601 S. MARKET AVENUE.
ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> MOVE FOR APPROVAL.
>> SECOND. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS. JOHNSON SCOTT MOVES FOR APPROVAL, MS. CLEMONS SECONDS.
[k. Voluntary Annexation - 505 Midway Road]
>> MS. BAKER.> YES. >> MS. CLEMONS.
>> YOU. >> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM.
ITEM 6K VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION 505 MIDWAY ROAD.
ENTERTAIN A MOTION.> MOVE APPROVAL.
>> SECOND. >> MS. BAKER MOVES FOR
[l. Voluntary Annexation - 2835 McNeil Road]
APPROVAL, MS. CLEMONS SECONDS >> MS. JOHNSON SCOTT.
>> YOU.> MS. CLEMONS. >> JUST.
>> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: SIX ELLA VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION. 2835 MCNEIL ROAD.
ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I MOVE FOR APPROVAL.
>>SECOND . >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS. CLEMONS SECOND MS. BAKER SECONDS.
[m. Voluntary Annexation - 3005 Summit Street]
>> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM. VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION 3005 SUMMIT STREET. I ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> MOVE FOR APPROVAL. >> SECOND.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS. JOHNSON SCOTT MOTION FOR
APPROVAL, MS. CLEMONS SECOND. >> MS. CLEMONS.
[n. Voluntary Annexation - 4119 Oleander Avenue]
>> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM. VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION 4119 OLEANDER AVENUE. ENTERTAIN A MOTION.> MOVE
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS. BAKER MOVED FOR APPROVAL,
CALLED THE ROLL CALL. >> MS. CLEMONS.
>> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES,
MA'AM. >> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER , I'M NOT SURE IF I MADE A MISTAKE OR WE LEFT OFF THE ANNEXATIONS FOR
COPENHAGEN ROAD. >> I THINK WE DID SKIP ONE.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: DID WE SKIP ONE?
>> J. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: OKAY.
[j. Four (4) Voluntary Annexations - 1720, 1760, 1840, and 1998 Copenhaver Road]
ITEM 6J FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS 1720, 1760, 1840 AND 1998 COPENHAGEN ROAD. ENTERTAIN A MOTION.> MOVE>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS. JOHNSON SCOTT MOVES FOR
APPROVAL, MS. CLEMONS SECONDS. >> MR. BRODERICK.
>> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: YES, MA'AM. YOU ARE SO EFFICIENT.
IF IT WAS NOT FOR YOU. BOY, I'M GLAD WE ARE OVER WITH THAT ONE. DON'T BRING THEM LIKE THAT
[7. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR]
ANYMORE! OKAY.NEXT ITEM ON OUR LIST IS ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR. SOME YEARS AGO WE CHOSE TO NOT HAVE ELECTIONS FOR SECRETARY ANY LONGER AND THAT OUR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WOULD ACT AS OUR SECRETARY AS SHE IS THE OFFICIAL GATE KEEPER, IF YOU WILL, OF ALL INFORMATION THAT GOES THROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
>> I WOULD NOMINATE YOURSELF TO CONTINUE IN THE GERMANS
>> YOU DON'T SECOND THE NOMINATION.
>> DO YOU? >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I AM OKAY WITH THE SECOND. DISCUSSION?
>> YOU HAVE DONE A MAGNIFICENT JOB, YOU'D KEEP US ON TASK AND YOU BRING IN TIDBITS AT THE END ABREAST OF WHAT IS GOING ON.
AND YOU HAVE NO PROBLEMS ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL WORKSHOPS.
AND JUST THINK YOU ARE DOING A GREAT JOB.
[01:30:01]
PLUS, YOU ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: THANK
YOU VERY MUCH. >> I DO HAVE A COMMENT THAT I THINK THE STABILITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD HAS REALLY BECOME MORE REINFORCED OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS.
I KNOW THERE HAVE BEEN A VARIETY OF CHANGES MADE WITH PERSONNEL ETC. BUT I FEEL AS THOUGH THE PLANNING BOARD HAS MADE SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS IN ELEVATING ITS GAME TO WHAT THE CITY CURRENTLY NEEDS. WE APPROVED A COUPLE OF MILVIAN SQUARE FEET WORTH OF PROJECTS. THIS IS THE REAL DEAL.
AND I THINK WITH FRANK'S LEADERSHIP, HE MATURED TO THE POSITION. AND HE MADE IT HIS OWN.
AND I THINK THAT BALANCE SHOULD REMAIN INTACT MOVING FORWARD.
I SEE THE PLANNING BOARD COMING AS THINGS GET BUSIER.
AND I SUPPORT FRANK AND I WORKING WITH HIM.
>> THANK YOU. >> MOVE THAT NOMINATIONS BE
>> ALL THE ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >> MS. CLEMONS.
>> YES.> MS. JOHNSON SCOTT. >> YES.
AND I APPRECIATE FOR THE COMMENTS THE VOTE OF CONTINUED SUPPORT. DISCUSSION ON VICE CHAIR OR A
MOTION FOR VICE CHAIR? >> I NOMINATE MR. BRODERICK FOR
VICE CHAIR. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ANY
DISCUSSION? >> PRETTY EASY JOB.
I WILL TAKE IT IF YOU WANT ME. >> YOU WORKED PRETTY HARD ON A
PROJECT FOR US. >> MY OFFICE STAFF KEEPS
REMINDING ME OF THAT. >> THAT WAS A BATTLE.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: I ALSO FEEL THAT MR. BRODERICK HAS DONE A VERY GOOD JOB OF BEING VICE CHAIR.
HE HAS HELPED ME IN LINE A COUPLE OF TIMES.
MY WIFE HAS BEEN TRYING TO DO THAT FOR 34 YEARS AND SHE STILL STRUGGLES AT TIMES. BUT HE IS ALSO A GOOD SECOND ON THIS BOARD. BRINGS A LOT OF KNOWLEDGE FROM A LOT OF DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS WITH DIFFERENT POINTS OF VIEW FROM REAL ESTATE TO DEVELOPMENT THE MANAGEMENT OF PROPERTIES AND WE NEED THAT. THANK YOU.
>> IS THAT A SECOND? DID YOU SECOND MY NOMINATION.
>> NO, I DID NOT. >> I MOVE THE NOMINATION BE
CLOSED. >> WE DON'T NEED A SECOND.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: DO WE REALLY NEED A SECOND?
>> SECOND. >>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: MS.
CLEMENS SECONDS IT. >> ALL THE ROLL, PLEASE.
>> MS. JOHNSON-SCOTT. >> MS. CLEMONS.
[9. DIRECTOR'S REPORT]
>> YES. >> CHAIRMAN CREYAUFMILLER.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: NEXT ITEM IS DIRECTORS REPORT AND I THINK YOU INDICATED YOU HAD NO REPORT?
>> I WANTED TO MAKE A COUPLE COMMENTS FROM YOU AND ONE IS WITH REGARDS TO MR. ALBURY MOTHER.I'M TRYING TO FIND OUT WHAT IS IN FLOWERS BUT I WOULD LIKE TO DO THAT ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD AND PLANNING STAFF THE REAGAN AND SECONDLY, I WANT YOU TO LET YOU KNOW IF YOU DO NOT KNOW THAT BRANDON HAS ACCEPTED A POSITION WITH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
HIS LAST DAY IS THE 23RD OR 24TH OF SEPTEMBER.
SO THIS WAS HIS LAST MEETING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING BOARD.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: AND THAT IS ASKED SO LEWDLY TERRIBLE.
HAVE UNDER THE COUNTER HERE A CHAIN AND A BOWL.
EVERYBODY IS GOING TO HOLD YOU AND WE WILL PUT IT ON YOU AND YOU WILL NOT GET OUT OF HERE. BRANDON, I HAVE WATCHED YOU OVER THE YEARS MATURE INTO POSITION AND TO THE PERSON YOU ARE ON THIS PLANNING AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
AND FROM MY PERSPECTIVE YOU HAVE DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB.
YOU'RE ONE OF THE KEY PEOPLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
[01:35:07]
AND YOU'RE GOING TO LEAVE A VACANCY BEHIND THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE EASY TO FILL. BECAUSE YOU HAVE MANAGED TO BE ABLE TO GATHER A LOT OF HISTORICAL VALUE IN THE CITY THROUGH YOUR YEARS OF BEING HERE.AND I LOST TRACK OF HOW MANY YEARS YOU HAVE BEEN HERE.
AND SEEMS LIKE YESTERDAY YOU CAME IN AND BEGAN INTRODUCING PROJECTS TO US AND STUMBLED AROUND A LITTLE BIT.
AND NOW YOU ARE SO SMOOTH AND YOU FLOW RATE THROUGH EVERYTHING. NOTHING BOTHERS YOU.
NOBODY THROW SOMETHING AT YOU THAT YOU WERE TOTALLY LOST IN.
I REALLY APPRECIATE THE WAY THAT YOU HAVE DEVELOPED.
WE ARE GOING TO MISS YOU AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IS GOING TO
GET A GOOD EMPLOYEE. >> THANK YOU FOR THE KIND WORDS. FOR THE RECORD WE HAVE BEEN TOGETHER FOR FIVE YEARS. I PASSED MY FIVE YEAR ANNIVERSARY ON 6 SEPTEMBER. WE ARE BUTTING UP RIGHTAGAINST THAT . I HAVE GONE BACK AND FORTH ABOUT WHAT I WANTED TO SAY, BUT I FIGURED I WOULD KEEP IT SHORT AND SWEET. IT HAS BEEN AN HONOR AND A PRIVILEGE TO PRESENT IN FRONT OF ALL YOU.
AND I COULD NOT IMAGINE A BETTER GOOD FIRST JOB TO HAVE.
JUST AS YOU SAY, WILL BE MISSED, YOU WILL BE MISSED IN MY HEART AS WELL. I'M NOT GOING TO CALL IT GOODBYE BUT I WILL CALL IT GOODBYE FOR NOW.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: VERY GOOD.
I KNOW JENNIFER IS GOING TO MISS YOU.
>> I DO HAVE ONE COMMENT. THIS IS A FOLLOW-UP.
A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT TACK. THERE HAVE BEEN CHALLENGING PROJECTS THAT HAVE COME UP IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING BOARD WITH PRETTY SIGNIFICANT GIVE AND TAKE WITH APPLICANTS.
BUT MY EXPERIENCE WITH YOU ON THESE COMPLEX PROJECTS WAS THAT WHEN WE NEEDED BEDROCK INFORMATION WE COULD TAKE TO THE BANK, YOU PROVIDED THAT. SHOULD ANSWER THE QUESTIONS AND IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW YOU INDICATED YOU NEEDED TO GATHER MORE INFORMATION. I WAS IMPRESSED WITH YOUR PRESENTATIONS OVER TIME. THEY GOT BETTER AND BETTER WITH TIME. BUT I ALWAYS FELT 100 PERCENT CONFIDENT THE INFORMATION WE WERE GETTING FROM YOU WAS NOT SPUN UP, YOU KNEW IT FACTUALLY AND YOU WERE THE BEDROCK OF THE INFORMATION BEING PRESENTED TO THIS BODY.
AND THAT WILL SERVE YOU WELL MOVING INTO YOUR FUTURE POSITION, WHICH I'M GOING TO ASSUME IS A STEP UP.
AND INTO A LARGER ENVIRONMENT. AND I CONGRATULATE YOU FOR THAT. BUT I DO SHARE THE CHAIRMAN CENTS THAT YOU WILL BE MISSED SIGNIFICANTLY.
I WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK. >> I REMEMBER THE FIRST TIME, PROBABLY THE FIRST FEW MONTHS OR MAYBE YEAR I WAS HERE I WAS READING FROM THAT LITTLE PIECE OF PAPER.
AND EVENTUALLY IT ALL JUST WENT AWAY.> CONGRATULATIONS.
>> THANK YOU. >> MY LAST THING, I KNOW I PROMISED THE BOARD I WAS GOING TO BE PRESENTING ÃI WAS NOT BOARD WAS GOING TO BE JACK ANDREWS OR CITY ENGINEER, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROGRAM.
BUT HE HAD A FEW WEEKS OUT NOT WELL SO I DID FIND OUT TODAY HE HAS RETURNED TO THE OFFICE AND AM VERY HAPPY ABOUT THAT.
AND THAT WILL BE ON THE AGENDA NEXT MONTH.
>>FRANK CREYAUFMILLER: ACTUALLY, WE WOULD'VE HAD TIME FOR IT BUT I WASN'T SO SURE THAT WE WOULD HAVE WHEN WE WALKED IN HERE TODAY. BUT THIS WENT VERY WELL TODAY.
AND WITH THAT, IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE?
>> ONE QUICK QUESTION. THE ANNEXATION BULK WE ARE SEEN, I THINK WE'LL BE SEEING MORE OF THIS.
>> WHAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING IS WE WOULD DO THE BULK OF THAT.
BUT I'M NOT SURE IF YOU HAD OPPORTUNITY OF LISTENING TO THE CONFERENCE AGENDA THIS MORNING, BUT TREASURE COACH REGIONAL COUNCIL WILL ALSO BE HELPING US.
SHE HAS ALREADY HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS WITH THE COUNTY.
WE HAD THAT JOINT MEETING IN MAY WHERE WE ARE GOING TO BE WORKING ON A SERVICE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT, WHICH WOULD ALLOW FOR A LARGER AREA, A CHUNK LIKE.
HIS PALMS AS WE LIKE TO DO OUR FIRST ONE.
TO START SQUARING OFF OUR BOUNDARIES MORE SIGNIFICANTLY.
UT WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO THIS.
WE HAVE 200 OTHER PROPERTIES THAT HAVE THIS FORGETTING WATER AND SEWER AND WE NEED TO GET THEM INTO THE CITY.SO YES.
HAVING SAID THAT WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO THIS BUT LOOK AT THE BIGGER PICTURE OF HOW WE CAN MAKE A LARGER IMPACT.
>> OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE?
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.