[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:06]
>>> MY NAME IS CLAUDETTE PELLETIER. I'M THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WHO HAS BEEN APPOINTED TO PRESIDE OVER THE HEARING TODAY. THESE WILL BE RECORDED AND TELEVISED. THANK YOU.
IF WE COULD ALL STAND, PLEASE, FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IS STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
THANK YOU. AND, IF THE DEPARTMENT WITNESSES WOULD COME FORWARD TO
[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
BE SWORN. >>CLERK: .PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
DO YOU SWEAR AND AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO GET WILL BE THE TRUTH?
THANK YOU. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE:
>>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, FOR A WE WILL HOLD FOR A LITTLE BIT WE ARE WAITING FOR THE OFFICER
TO RESPOND. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY.
[B. IDENTIFICATION OF CASES IN COMPLIANCE OR RESCHEDULED]
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. THE FIRST CASES HAVE ALREADY BEEN COMPLIED OR THEY ARE PAID.
AND IT'S CASE FOR B, CASE IN 19 A WEEK. THAT IS PAID.
FOR D IS PAID. AND THEN 5D, 19-1966 IS COMPLY. 19-1967 IS COMPLIANT.
AND 19- 1958 5 L IS COMPLIED. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THE FIRST
[C. 19-2472 PK Orange Ave/IRD lot Render, Dontallis Lorenzo John Futch]
CASE WE ARE PRESENT -- I'M SORRY THE FIRST CASE WE ARE GOING TO PRESENT IS A CITATION FOR C 19-24/7 TWO. ORANGE AVENUE R -- IRD LODGE. RENDER.>>> GOOD MORNING SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. MAY I INQUIRE OF THE WITNESS?
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: PLEASE D .
>> I SEE THERE'S NO RESPONDED PRESENT.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THERE IS NO ONE HERE? OKAY.
>> GOOD MORNING OFFICER. I KNOW YOU WERE PREVIOUSLY SWORN BY CAN YOU STATE YOUR
FULL NAME, PLEASE. >> JOHN FUTCH.
>>> WHERE YOU WORK. >> CITY OF FORT PIERCE, PARKING
SPECIALIST. >> DID YOU WRITE THE CITATION WITH THE CASE THAT HAS BEEN CALLED?
>> YES. >> WHAT DATE DID YOU WRITE THAT
CITATION? >> SEPTEMBER 10 SEPTEMBER 10,
2019. >> WHAT WAS THE NATURE OF THE
VIOLATION THAT YOU OBSERVE. >> IT WAS A TWO HOUR PARKING
VIOLATION. >> DID YOU OBSERVE THE VEHICLE PARKED IN ONE SPACE AND RETURN MORE THAN TWO HOURS LATER AND DETERMINED THAT THE VEHICLE HAD
>> DID YOU TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> YES, HE DID.
>> AND DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> THEY ARE ACCURATE. >> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS HAVE
>> AT THIS TIME WE WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS AS THE CITY'S COMPOSITE ONE.
>> IT WILL BE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE.
>> IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU'D LIKE TO SAY WITH REGARD TO THE PHOTOGRAPHS OR YOUR
INVESTIGATION IN THIS CASE? >> NO.
>> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY.
I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE RESPONDENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I ORDERED DEFINE OF $50 PLUS THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE OF $10, A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE FAILURE TO PAY WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT. WE JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, 30 DAYS TO PAY?
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: YES. 30 DAYS TO PAY.
>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, SPECIAL
[00:05:13]
MAGISTRATE. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THANK
[E. 19-2295 AC 106 N 16th Street Fitzpatrick, Alexis D Ricardo Pellot]
YOU. NEXT CASE WE HAVE SOMEBODY PRESENT ITS CASE 4 E 19-2295, 106 N. 16TH STREET, FITZPATRICK.>> GOOD MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, I BELIEVE THE RESPONDENT WAS PRESENT SELF WE CAN HAVE THEM
COME UP AND BE SWORN. P>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: WOULD YO
PLEASE BE SWORN BY THE CLERK. >>THE CLERK: IS SHE GOING TO GO
TO THE PODIUM? >> IF YOU COULD COME TO THE
PODIUM, PLEASE. >>THE CLERK: RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE GOOD.
(WHEREUPON, THE RESPONDENT WAS SWORN IN.).
>>THE CLERK: THANK YOU. >> WE CAN INQUIRE OF OFFICER
HOLLAND? >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: PLEASE.
>> STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND WHAT YOU DO FOR A LIVING.
>> RICARDO A LOT FORT PIERCE ANIMAL CONTROL.
>> DID YOU DO THE INVESTIGATION IN RELATION TO CASE NO.: 19-Ã 2295?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> DID YOU ISSUE A CITATION IN
AND CAN YOU TELL US HOW YOU GOT CALLED TO THE SCENE?
>> IT WAS A SATURDAY AND I WAS THE ONE OFFICER ON CALL. I RECEIVED A CALL FROM 911 SAID THAT THE OFFICERS HAD FOUND A DEAD DOG, PITBULL, IN A KENNEL ON SOMEBODY'S PORCH LIKE --
CARPORT. >> DID YOU GO TO THE SCENE RIGHT AWAY AFTER RECEIVING A CALL?
>> YES. >> CAN YOU TELL US MORE ABOUT
YOUR INVESTIGATION? >> WHEN I ARRIVED, I SAW THERE WAS A PITBULL IN A WIRE CRATE DEAD. THERE WAS FOOD IN THE CRATE.
THERE WAS NO WATER. MS. FITZPATRICK ARRIVED AND SAID IT WAS HER DOG, THAT HE HAD BEEN SECOND THAT THEY CALLED HER ON FRIDAY MORNING SAYING THAT THE DOG HAD DIED.
AND I WAS THERE SATURDAY AFTERNOON. SHE WAS JUST ARRIVING.
SHE SAID SHE WAS GOING TO BURY THE DOG.
>> OKAY. SO THIS WAS AUGUST, CORRECT?
>> AUGUST 10, APPROXIMATELY 4:00 O'CLOCK.
>> YOU OBSERVE NO WATER IN THE BOWL?
AND WAS THE -- THE DOG WAS LOCATED IN A GREAT, CORRECT?
>> YES. >> WAS THE END -- THE GREAT
INDOORS OR OUTDOORS? >> IT WAS OUTDOORS ON A
CARPORT. >> THE ONLY PLACE THAT YOU RESPONDED THAT WAS NOT MS. FITZPATRICK'S HOME, CORRECT?
>> NO. MS. FITZPATRICK TOLD ME THAT HER FRIENDS WERE KEEPING HER DOG FOR HER BECAUSE SHE COULD NOT HAVE IT WHERE SHE LIVES.
>> OKAY. BUT SHE ADVISED YOU THAT SHE KNEW THE DOG WAS ILL?
DID YOU DISCUSS WITH HER ANY ATTEMPT TO GET THE DOG MEDICAL ATTENTION?
>> AT THAT TIME, I MEAN, THE DOG WAS ALREADY DECEASED, SO I DID NOT.
>> OKAY. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE WITH REGARD YOUR INVESTIGATION THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SAY AT THIS TIME.
>>. >> DID YOU TAKE PHOTOS OF THE
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW.
>> YES. >> CAN YOU GO AHEAD AND SHOW THEM TO MS. FITZPATRICK, PLEASE, BEFORE WE HAND THEM UP TO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE?
HAVE YOU HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THE PHOTO, MA'AM?
>> OKAY. SO AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WOULD MOVE THE PHOTO AS CITY'S ONE.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: SAY NO OBJECTION, I ADMIT THE PHOTO INTO EVIDENCE.
>> MAY I HAVE JUST ONE MOMENT, MA'AM? OKAY.
>> OFFICER PELLOT, I AM PUTTING UP ON THE SCREEN THE PHOTO THAT YOU TOOK.
>> AS. >> CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE CONDITION OF THE DOG, IN YOUR OPINION?
>> I CAN'T SEE -- YOU CAN SEE THE FACE RIGHT NOW. BUT HE HAD GUNK ON HIS EYES AND
[00:10:06]
HIS BLOATED AND HIS GUN FLIES ALL OVER HIM. BASICALLY, TO ME, IF I CAME UP AND HE WAS ALIVE, HE WOULD BE A -- HE WOULD BE IN GOOD -- HE WOULDN'T BE IN GOOD SHAPE IF HEWAS ALIVE. >> SO WHAT DID YOU OBSERVE THAT LED YOU TO BELIEVE THAT THE DOG SPECIFICALLY -- BASED ON YOUR OBSERVATIONS -- THAT THE DOG
THE NO MEDICAL CARE AFTER SHE INFORMED ME THAT SHE KNEW THE DOG WAS SET AND SHE DID NOT
IT WAS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ANIMAL HAS BEEN AT THE LOCATION WHERE YOU RESPONDED FOR AT LEAST A COUPLE OF DAYS, CORRECT?
SO IT WAS YOUR UNDERSTANDING THAT IN THAT TIME SPAN, THE DOG HAD NOT RECEIVED MEDICAL ATTENTION PRIOR TO PASSING AWAY, CORRECT?
DID YOU ALSO LOOK INTO WHETHER OR NOT THE ANIMAL WAS PROBABLY REGISTERED?
>> SHE INFORMED ME THAT THE DOG WAS NOT CURRENT ON RABIES OR REGISTRATION.
>> OKAY. DID YOU INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THAT?
>> I JUST SPOKE WITH THE OWNER OF THE DOG.
>> OKAY. SO AS FAR AS YOU KNOW, THERE WAS NO ACTIVE REGISTRATION.
AND AS FAR AS YOU KNOW THE OWNER WAS NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE ANYTHING WITH RABIES
SHE TOLD ME THERE WASN'T -- IT WASN'T REGISTERED OR PVACCINATED.
SHE STATED THOSE EGGS HAD NOT BEEN DONE?
I DO NOT HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK?
>> I DID INFORM HIM THAT I DID NOT HAVE REGISTRATION FOR THE DOG.
BUT HE WAS VACCINATED. I HAD RECEIVED THE VACCINATION .
HE WE HAD TO ADMINISTER THEM OURSELVES AT HOME TO THE DOG. HE WAS NOT TAKEN TO A BETTER ANYTHING LIKE THAT. I HAVE GOT THE VACCINATIONS FROM A STORE FROM ORANGE AVENUE GOING TOWARDS THE ROCK ROAD, BUT I DID NOT HAVE THEM REGISTERED.
BUT I DID TELL HIM I DID NOT HAVE THEM REGISTERED, BUT HAD RECEIPTS FOR HIS SHOTS.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. DID YOU SHOW HIM THE RECEIPTS?
>> NO. I HAD INFORMED HIM THAT MY RECEIPTS WERE NOT ON ME.
I WAS JUST COMING TO THE HOUSE TO COME AND GET THE DOG BECAUSE I GOT A CALL FROM THE WOMAN'S HOUSE SO I ENTRUSTED MY DOG WITH THAT, I GUESS, THE OFFICERS FOUND HER CHILD IN THE HOUSE BY HIMSELF. SO SHE WANTED ME TO GO AND HURRY UP AND GET THE DOG.
BUT I HAD JUST GOT A SHOVEL. THAT'S WHAT I WAS TELLING.
I TOLD HIM THE WHOLE TRUTH. I MEAN, I WAS CHECKING ON HIM. THERE WAS A HUGE BAG OF DOG FOOD. HE SAW THAT THAT DAY. THERE WAS NO WATER IN HIS BOWL, BUT THE GIRL INFORMED ME THAT BEFORE SHE LEFT TO WORK, SHE DID LEAVE WATER FOR HIM.
BUT WHEN WE GOT THERE, THERE WAS NO WATER IN HIS BOWL. THERE WAS FOOD IN HIS BOWL.
>> MS. FITZPATRICK, MAN? YOU JUST TESTIFIED THAT YOU GET THE RABIES VACCINATIONS YOURSELF THAT YOU PICKED UP AT ONE OF THE STORES EITHER TRACTOR SUPPLY OR BIG JOHN.
UNFORTUNATELY, IT IS NOT ILLEGAL RABIES VACCINATION. PER STATE STATUTE, ONLY A VET CAN ISSUE A RABIES VACCINATION FOR A DOG.
>> OKAY. >> UNFORTUNATELY, IT'S NOT A VALID RABIES BECAUSE ONLY A VET COULD DO IT AND IF IT WILL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE IN THAT'S
WHY THERE IS NO RABIES. >> OKAY.
I DID NOT KNOW THAT. I AM SORRY.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: DID THE ATTORNEY HAVE ANY?
>> NO, MA'AM. I DON'T HAVE ANY FURTHER. -- EVIDENCE TO PRESENT.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: JEFF ANYTHING ELSE? HOW LONG HAD IT BEEN SINCE YOU
HAD SEEN THE DONKEY. >> WAS COMING OVER THERE IN THE MORNING TIME BEFORE I WENT TO WORK. AFTER I GOT OFF WORK, I WOULD GO OVER THERE FEED AND WATER HIM. HE WOULD BE WELL.
SHE WAS LETTING THEM INSIDE THE HOUSE BUT SHE GOT ANOTHER DOG, WHICH WAS A PITBULL AND HE WAS A LITTLE BIT BIGGER THAN HIM AN OLDER. SO SHE TOLD ME THAT SHE HAD TO LET HIM OUTSIDE. AND I TOLD HER WELL, IF YOU HAVE HIM OUTSIDE, HE NEEDS TO BE COVERED AND DON'T LEAVE HIS DOOR OPEN. BUT HE DID TELL ME BECAUSE THE DOOR WAS LOCKED, IF HE WAS ALIVE, IT MAKES IT SEEM LIKE HE DIED LIKE HE WAS LOCKED UP AND FROM HOW HOT IT WAS THAT DAY.
SO I DON'T -- I WASN'T THERE THE WHOLE TIME. I DID NOT LIVE WITH HER.
I WAS LIVING IN -- ON AVENUE L. AND SHE -- AND I CANNOT HAVE A DOG OVER ON AVENUE L.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER DOCUMENT WAS THE DOG LOCKED IN THE --
[00:15:10]
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: DO YOU HAVE ANY BASIS FOR THINKING THAT -- THAT HE PASSED AWAY BECAUSE HE WAS IN THE HEAT? I MEAN --
>> I, LIKE I SAID. I AM NOT A VET. I CAN'T SAY ON THAT, BUT -- SO SHE DID TELL ME THAT THE DOG WAS SICK.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, IN ADDITION TO THE OFFICERS TESTIMONY WHERE HE STATED THAT, YOU KNOW, NO VETERINARY CARE WAS GIVEN, WHICH IS A SOURCE OF NEGLECT, WE ALSO DO HAVE AN ORDINANCE THAT JUST HAVING A DOG IN A CRATE LIKE THIS OUTSIDE IS PROHIBITED.
IT'S THE SAME CODE AND THE SAME ORDINANCE AS 14-24 -- AND FOUR Ã24, WHICH WAS CITED, BUT JUST BEING IN THE CRATE OUTSIDE UNATTENDED IS A VIOLATION ALSO.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: ESPECIALLY IN AUGUST. OKAY.
I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION -- CAN YOU GO BACK TO WHERE -- I FIND THAT THE VIOLATIONS EXIST AND THAT THE VIOLATOR SHOULD BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
AND IF THEY -- WHICH, THE TOTAL IS ASSESSED WITH THE -- ALL OF THE FEES AND FINES, IT'S $645.
IF YOU NEED A TIME TO PAY THAT, I THINK THAT CAN BE WORKED OUT. AND I GIVE -- TO YOU -- DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH TIME YOU WOULD NEED?
>> PROBABLY JUST 30 DAYS. I CAN PAID IN 30 DAYS.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. AND THE FAILURE TO PAY THE FINE WITHIN 30 DAYS WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. OKAY.
[A. 19-2824 VR 102 Shelley Lane Rego, Humberto M & Belkis Chad Dawson]
NEXT CASES 5 A 19-2024, 102 SHELLEY LANE, REGO.>> GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS CHAD DAWSON.
THIS IS CASE NO.: 19- 2824, THE CASE OF 102 SHELLEY LANE. THE OWNER IS HUMBERT DOM AND BELKIN IS REGO. THE CASE WAS INITIATED OCTOBER 20, 2019.
THEY WERE FOUND IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 22 Ã22 ALLOWED USES. THE CITY REQUEST THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION WAS EXISTED BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO THE HEARING THAT THE VIOLATOR BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT PER STATE STATUTE 162.0 SAID SUBSECTION 3, THAT REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN -- IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BEING ASSESSED.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTED BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING. AND THAT THE VIOLATOR WILL BE PUT ON NOTICE PER STATE STATUTE 162.06, THAT A REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES
[B. 19-1505 CE 711 S Ocean Drive Fond De Blanc Inc Chad Dawson]
>>THE CLERK: NEXT IS 5 B. 19-1505, 711 S. OCEAN DRIVE. FOND THE BLANK INC.
>> THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-1505, 711 S. OCEAN DRIVE. OWNED BY FOND THE BLOCK CORPORATION. THE CASE WAS INITIATED IN JUNE 17, 2019.
THE PROPERTY WAS CITED FOR IPMC 304.1, EXTERIOR STRUCTURE. IPMC IPMC304 IPMC 304.2 PROTECTIVE TREATMENT. THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A $50 FINE WILL BE ASSESSED.
I HAVE PHOTOS TO SUBMIT FOR EVIDENCE, COMPOSITE 1 AND COMPOSITE 2.
>> CAN I INQUIRE IF THE PHOTOS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
[00:20:02]
>> OKAY. AND I AM NOTING THAT THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANYBODY
>> THE COMPOSITE PHOTOS WILL BE SUBMITTED INTO EVIDENCE AS THE CITY'S EXHIBIT.
>> IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO TELL THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ABOUT THE PHOTOS.
>> SO FOR PROTECTIVE TREATMENT, THEY NEEDED TO PAINT THE TRIM. ALSO, THERE ARE SEVERAL SPOTS ON THE HOUSE THEY NEED TO PRESSURE WASH OR PAINT. WE SAY PRESSURE WASH OR PAINT BECAUSE OF A PRESSURE WASH, THE PETE MIGHT PEEL. SO IF PAINTING IS THE BEST OPTION, THEY CAN DO THAT AS WELL.
THE SOFFIT ON THE OTHER PHOTOS IS FOLLOWING AND THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT IS ON THE PHOTOS.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $50 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED AFTER THE 10 DAYS.
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >>THE CLERK: OKAY.
[A. 19-1907 PK South Causeway Park Alvarez, Keelyn Lannie #4919 Montgomery]
WE ARE GOING BACK TO 4 A CASE NO.: 19-1907 S. CAUSEWAY PARKWAY, ALVAREZ.THIS IS OFFICER MONTGOMERY. QUICK SURE. YOU CAN STAND.
(WHEREUPON, THE RESPONDENT WAS SWORN IN.).
>> DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: IS THERE ANYONE HERE?
>> NOW. >> GOOD MORNING, OFFICER.
CAN YOU STATE YOUR FULL NAME FOR THE RECORD.
ARE YOU A FORT PIERCE POLICE OFFICER?
>> DID YOU WRITE THE CITATION IN RELATION TO THIS CASE.
>> YES, I DID. >> WHAT DID YOU WRITE THAT
WERE YOU WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF FORT PIERCE.
>> I WAS. >> AND WHEREABOUTS WERE YOU
LOCATED? >> SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK IN FORT PIERCE. RIGHT OFF OF SEAWAY DRIVE.
>> AND WAS IS A PARKING TICKET? >> YES, IT WAS.
>> OKAY. WHAT WAS WRONG WITH THE VEHICLE?
>> HE WAS PARKED OFF ROAD IN THE GRASS.
>> OKAY. IS HE PARKED IN AN AREA THAT WAS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PARKING?
>> YES. >> CAN YOU TAKE A PICTURE OF
>> DOES IT DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? >> YES.
>> AT THIS TIME WE WOULD MOVE TO ADMIT THE PHOTO AS CITY'S 1.
WE ARE GOING TO HAND IT UP TO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
>> I HAD MORE, BUT I DO NOT SEE THOSE.
>> OKAY. HIS -- WELL, WE WILL WAIT AND SEE IF IT IS GOING TO BE
ADMITTED. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: YES.
THE PHOTO THAT IS SUBMITTED WILL BE ADMITTED AS CITY'S 1. THIS IS THE ONLY PHOTO WE ARE
ADMITTING, CORRECT? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> YES, MA'AM. >> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE PHOTOGRAPH?
>> NO, MA'AM. >> DOESN'T JUST SHOW HOW THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED OR WHERE EXACTLY IT WAS PARKEY.
>> IT SHOWS EXACTLY WHERE IT WAS PARKED. THERE IS A SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF THAT, THAT THEY JUMP OVER THE SIDEWALK TO PULL INTO THE GRASS.
AND IT'S BEEN BEING DONE FOR A LONG TIME AND A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE SAID THAT THAT IS WHERE THEY HAVE ALWAYS PARKED. BUT THEY ARE JUMPING OVER A SIDEWALK TO GET TO THAT AREA.
>> TO REACH THAT -- IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, IN ORDER TO REACH THE AREA WHERE THE VEHICLE WAS THEY WOULD HAVE HAD TO JUMP THE SIDEWALK?
>> YES. >> I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS. THE VIOLATOR SHALL BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE, WHICH IS $70, AS INDICATED. THEY WILL HAVE 30 DAYS TO PAY.
FAILURE TO PAY THE FINE WITHIN THE 30 DAYS WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT.
>> THANK YOU. NEXT CASES 5 C, 19- 2594. 1014 S. SEVENTH STREET,
[C. 19-2594 VR 1014 S 7TH Street Robbins, D Michael Chad Dawson]
ROBBINS. >> THIS IS CASE NO.: 19- 2594.
[00:25:14]
1014 S. SEVENTH STREET OWNED BY ROBBINS, D. MICHAEL.THE CASE WAS INITIATED OCTOBER 3, 2019. THE VIOLATION IS 22-22, LOVE USES. THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTED BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO THE HEARING TODAY THAT THE VIOLATOR BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT PER STATE STATUTE 16 POINT -- 16 POINT -- 162.06 THAT A REPEAT VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BEING ACCESSED -- ASSESSED.
THE OWNER WAS HERE EARLIER. WE EXPLAINED TO HIM THE SITUATION AND -- YEAH.
HE SAID HE WILL DO IT AGAIN, BUT ELLIPSES.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. >> CAN YOU CLARIFY FOR US WHAT YOU CITED THE APPROPRIATE SUBSECTION BUT TELL US THE NATURE OF THE VIOLATION THAT WHAT IS OBSERVED AND IF IT WAS FIXED.
>> HE WAS ADVERTISING ON THE WEBSITE. WE TOLD HIM HE CAN'T DO IT AND TOOK THE ADVERTISEMENT DOWN AND IT WAS COMPLIED.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: WHAT WAS THE ADVERTISING FOR?
>> FOR RENTALS. >> AND THE AD IS DOWN?
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTED, BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING AND THAT THE LETTER WILL BE PUT ON NOTICE UNDER STATE STATUTE 162.06, THAT A REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BUCKS THANK YOU,
YOUR HONOR. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THANK
[F. 19-2390 CE 1710 Sunrise Blvd Toussaint, Michelot Isaac Saucedo]
YOU. >>THE CLERK: NEXT IS 5 F 19-2390, 1710 SUNRISE BOULEVAR .
>> GOOD MORNING. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: GOOD MORNING. THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-Ã-- THE CASE WAS INITIATED BY MYSELF ON AUGUST 22 -- THE CASE WAS INITIATED BY MYSELF ON AUGUST 22, 2019.
THE OWNERS ARE MICHAEL. >> THE VIOLATIONS WERE IPMC 304.7 ROADS AND DRAINAGE. THE CITY REQUEST THAT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATORS WILL BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $150 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. I HAVE PICTURES.
>> TODAY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES. BUT AS WE MOVE THAT THESE ARE CITY'S COMPOSITE ONE.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: CITY'S COMPOSITE ONE BE ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE.
>> I WILL NOTE THAT THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A RESPONDED HERE THIS MORNING.
IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE PHOTOS?
>> NO. I JUST HAVE NOT HAD ANY COMMUNICATION WHATSOEVER WITH
THE RESPONSIBLE PARTIES. >> IS THERE ANY INDICATION THAT THEY DID NOT RECEIVE NOTICE TO COME THIS MORNING?
>> NO. I ACTUALLY RECEIVED THE GREEN CARD BACK SO THEY -- THEY WERE
THANK YOU. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: I WILL FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF
$150 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. >>THE CLERK: WE HAVE NEXT 5 G
[G. 19-2072 CE 519 N 20th St Hopkins, William Hopkins, Tyrone Hopkins, Keshia Isaac Saucedo]
CASE 19-2072. 519 N. 20TH STREET, HOPKINS.>> THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-27 D2, 519 N. 20TH STREETS. THE CASE WAS INITIATED BY MYSELF ON AUGUST 5, 2019. THE OWNERS ARE WILLIAM, TYRONE AND KEISHA HOPKINS OF 2704 S.
29TH STREET IN FORT PIERCE. THE VIOLATIONS ARE IPMC 302.7, SECTION 16-20 5C RESPONSIBILITY OF OF CONTAINERS, SECTION 16-46, 47, 48 OF CONTAINERS, SECTION 16-46, 47, 4810 D NOT
[00:30:11]
OPERABLE VEHICLES IN SECTION 1646, 47 AND 48 NUMBER ONE FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE.THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS THAT THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $150 PER DAY.
I HAVE PHOTOS TO PRESENT. >> TO THE PHOTOS DEPICT WHAT
>> WE WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOS AS CITY'S COMPOSITE ONE. I'M NOTING THAT THERE WAS NO RESPONDENT PRESIDENT -- PRESENT THIS MORNING. HAVE YOU HAD COMMUNICATION WITH
BUT I RECEIVED THE GREEN CARD BACK FROM THEM. BUT NO COMMUNICATION
WHATSOEVER. >> THE GREEN CARD INDICATING THAT THEY HAVE BEEN SERVED TO COME HERE THIS MORNING?
>> YES. >> WAS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: PHOTOS 1 A THROUGH NUF WILL BE ADMITTED.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $150 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. AND I BELIEVE THE ORDER WILL STATE THAT THEY HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL AS WELL.
>> THANK YOU. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THANK
YOU. >>THE CLERK: THE NEXT CASES 5 H
[H. 19-1821 CE 120 Gardenia Avenue Andrade, Jose Zamora, Julian Heather Debevec]
19-1821, 120 GARDENIA AVENUE, ANDRE.>> GOOD MORNING, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. MY NAME IS HEATHER, CODE ENFORCEMENT.
THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-1821, 120 GARDENIA AVENUE OWNED BY JOSC) ANDRADE AND JULIAN ZAMORA.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 24, 2019. IT WAS FOR SECTION 16-46, 16-47, 60-48 SUBSECTION 1 AND FIVE OUTSIDE STORAGE. SECTION 1646, 47, 48 SUBSECTION 10 NUMB DEED NON-ARTICLE ÃNOT OPERABLE VEHICLES. THEY HAVE BEEN IN COMPLIANCE FOR THIS HEARING. THE CITY REQUEST THAT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTED, BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING, THE VIOLATORS BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT PER STATE STATUTE 162.06 SUBSECTION 3, THAT A REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BEING ASSESSED.
I DO HAVE PHOTOS AS WELL. >> TO THE PHOTOS DEPICT WHAT
>> THE CITY WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOS AND AS CITY'S COMPOSITE ONE.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THERE ARE FIVE PHOTOS. THEY WILL BE ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE. FOR THE CITY.
AND I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTED, BASED ON THE PICTURES AND TESTIMONY, BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING. THE VIOLATOR WILL BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT STATE STATUTE 162.06 (THREE), THAT A REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES
[I. 19-1811 CE 220 Gardenia Avenue Petion, Etzer Heather Debevec]
BEING ASSESSED. >>THE CLERK: NEXT IS 5 I CASE 19- 1811, 220 GARDENIA AVENUE. PETION.
>> CASE NO.: 19-1811, 220 GARDENIA AVENUE OWNED BY PETION, THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 24, 2019. IT WAS FOR SECTION 1646, 4748 SUBSECTION FOR PARKING ON OTHER THAN PAVEMENT. THE CITY REQUEST THAT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTED, BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING, THAT THE VIOLATOR BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT PER STATE STATUTE 162.06 SUBSECTION 3, A REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BEING ASSESSED.
AND I DO HAVE PHOTOS AS WELL. >> DO THEY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WE WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOS AS
CITY'S 1 COMPOSITE. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THE
[00:35:03]
PHOTOS ARE MARKED A, B, C, AND C WILL BE ADMITTED AS CITY'S EXHIBIT.I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTED, BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING AND THAT THE VIOLATORS WILL BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT PER STATE FLORIDA STATUTE 162.06 SUBSECTION 3, THAT A VIOLATION -- A REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION -- WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES
[J. 19-18269 CE 2616 Lakeshore Drive Diedrich, Helen Heather Debevec]
BEING ASSESSED. >>THE CLERK: NUMBER FIVE
>>THE CLERK: NUMBER 5J -1918 269, 2616 HOW, LAKESHORE DRIVE. DIETRICH.
>> HEATHER BEFORE YOU START CAN YOU CONFIRM THE CASE NO.: FOR ME, PLEASE?
>> IT IS 1918 26. >> A NINE ON THE END THE NINE
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: WOULD YOU PLEASE BE SWORN.
>>THE CLERK: RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
>> DOUGLAS DIETRICH X DOUGLAS? >> YES.
DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH.
>> THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-1826 2616 LAKESHORE DRIVE BY HELEN DIETRICH.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 24, 2019. IT WAS FOR IBM C3042 PROTECTIVE TREATMENT. IT'S REQUEST THAT THEY PAINT THE HOME AS THE PAINT IS PEELING AND DISCOLORED IN MANY AREAS. THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $50 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
I DO HAVE PHOTOS TO SUBMIT WHERE SOME PAINTING HAD BEEN STARTED AS OF YESTERDAY.
I SHOW THE PHOTOS TO MR. DIETRICH THIS MORNING AND HE SHARED PHOTOS ON HIS PHONE WITH ME SHOWING THAT HE HAD DONE A LOT MORE PAINTING SINCE MY VISIT YESTERDAY MORNING.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE EVERYTHING CLEAR, THE NAMED RESPONDENT ON THE CASES HELEN DIETRICH. SO IF WE COULD JUST TO CLARIFY THE GENTLEMAN'S RELATION TO HELEN?
>> HELEN'S HUSBAND AND SHE WOULD BE HERE, BUT HER JOB HAS TAKEN HER OUT OF STATE FOR THE NEXT TWO WEEKS OR SO. SO I'M APPEARING IN HER FACE.
>> YOU LIVE AT THE SAME LOCATION.
>> OKAY. >> SO WE COULD MOVE THE PHOTOS IN IS A COMPOSITE. IS THERE MORE THAN ONE PHOTOGRAPH?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> CAN REMOVE THEM AS A COMPOSITE AND CLARIFY IF THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: YOU HAVE SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPHS?
THEN THEY WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT.
DID YOU WANT TO ADD ANYTHING, SIR.
>> IF YOU'D LIKE TO SEE A COUPLE OF PHOTOS I HAVE TODAY I HAVE THEM ON MY PHONE IF THAT
IS NECESSARY. >> TO SHOW THEM TO THE -- TO ME THIS MORNING. I WAS ABLE TO SPEAK WITH THEM. AS YOU LOOK TO THE PHOTOS MY LAST PHOTO SHOWED A SMALL SECTION. HIS PHOTO SHOWED HE HAD DONE MORE PAINTING SINCE I HAD TAKEN MINE.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. DO YOU.
>> I'M SORRY -- WOULD YOU SAY IS IN COMPLIANCE OR ADDITIONAL WORK NEEDS TO BE DONE.
>> I NEED TO -- WOULD YOU LIKE TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER?
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WERE GOING TO REQUEST THERE'S GOING TO BE ANOTHER HEARING.
IF WE COULD CONTINUE THIS FOR SEVEN DAYS.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? WHAT IS THAT, PRECISELY?
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THEY WILL COME OUT AND INSPECT TO SEE IF YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE THAT IF YOU ARE, -- IF YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE, THEN THE MATTER IS CLOSED.
BUT IF WE NEED TO BRING IT BACK IN FRONT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WILL COME BACK NEXT
[00:40:05]
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: IT WILL BE CONTINUED FOR SEVEN DAYS.
>> OKAY. >> THANK YOU FOR COMING IN.
>> BEFORE YOU LEAVE, IF I MAY GET A CONTACT NUMBER FOR YOU.
[K. 19-1830 CE 116 Maple Avenue Chigani, Meera Heather Debevec]
>>THE CLERK: NEXT IS 5 K CASE 1918-3116 MAPLE AVENUE.
>> THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-1830 THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-1831 16 MAPLE AVENUE.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 24.
IT WAS FOR IBM C IT WAS FOR IBM C30 2.7 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS EVALUATION EXISTED THAT IT WAS COORDINATE THE FELLOW TO BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT PER STATE STATUTE ONE POINT -- THE REPEAT OF THE VIOLATIONS WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS PENALTIES BEING ASSESSED AND THERE ARE PHOTOS.
>> THE PHOTOS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WE MOVE THE PHOTOS AS CITIES
COMPOSITE 1. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY.
THE PHOTOS WILL BE ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE 1. THANK YOU.
>> I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTED BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO THE HEARING THE VIOLATOR BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT PER STATE STATUTE 162.06 (3) AND A REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BEING ASSESSED.
[M. 19-1635 CE 608 N 23rd Street Ray, Conquistador Regular]
>> NEXT IS 5M CASE 19-1635 1608 N. 23RD STREET, RAY.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: WOULD YOU PLEASE BE SWORN CITY'S RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE REC (WHEREUPON, THE RESPONDENT WAS SWORN IN.).
>> THIS IS CASE NO.: 19 608 N. 23RD STREET -- STREET. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JUNE 27, 2019. IT WAS FOR SECTION 16, 48 SUBSECTION 1.
REQUESTING THAT THEY REMOVE THE SHED THE BUCKETS, STRUT PIECES AND OTHER LOOSE ITEMS FROM THE FRONT YARD. THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT OF THE SPECIAL IN A STRAIGHT FINDS IT EXISTS THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN $10 TO COMPLY. OR A FINE OF 10 DAYS WILL BE ASSESSED. I HAVE PHOTOS AND YOU CAN SEE WHERE THERE HAVE BEEN IMPROVEMENTS. BUT HE HAS NOT HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT THE PHOTOS SO I WISH THAT HE HAVE THAT.
>> (INDISCERNIBLE). >> WE ARE GOING TO MOVE THOSE
AS CITIES COMPOSITE 1. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THANK
YOU. >> THE PHOTOS PRESENTED WILL BE ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE 1. -- CITY'S COMPOSITE 1.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADD TO --
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: YOU ARE SAYING.
> I DID EVERYTHING SHE WANTED. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: I NEED YOU TO TALK INTO THE MICROPHONE.
>> EVERYTHING IS DONE. I DON'T KNOW IF HIS CLAIM TO YELL STANDARD, BUT EVERYTHING
SHE SAID, I DID IT. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, SIMILAR TO THE LAST CASE IF WE COULD CONTINUE THIS FOR SEVEN DAYS SO THAT THE OFFICER CAN INSPECT THE PROPERTY. IF IT'S IN COMPLIANCE, IT WILL BE RESOLVED, IF IT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE IT WILL BE BROUGHT BACK NEXT WEDNESDAY. OKAY?
DOES SHE HAVE YOUR CONTACT? >> I WAS GOING TO ESCORT PHONE
NUMBER. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY.
THANK YOU. THE CASE WILL BE CONTINUED FOR SEVEN DAYS AND IF IT'S NOT IN COMPLIANCE, IT WILL BE HARD AT THE NEXT HEARING.
>> OKAY. >> A WAY TO REACH YOU?
[00:45:04]
THAT WAY I CAN LET YOU KNOW. I DO NOT HAVE HER NUMBER, SIR.>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THANK YO .
[N. 19-2687 CE 109 Avenue D Avenue D Investments LLC Heather Debevec]
>>THE CLERK: NEXT IS 5M -- 5 N. 19-2687, 109 AVENUE D, AVENUE D INVESTMENTS, LLC.
>> CITY OF FORT PIERCE CODE ENFORCEMENT. THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-2687 CITY OF FORT PIERCE CODE ENFORCEMENT. THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-2687109D.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 15, 2019. IT WAS FOR SECTION 22-187 SUBSECTION 13 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTED THAT WAS CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING THAT THE VIOLATOR BE PUT ON NOTICE PER STATE STATUTE 162.06 (3) AND THAT OF REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN A GOOD -- ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BEING ASSESSED.
I DO NOT HAVE PHOTOS BECAUSE THIS COMPLY BEFORE THE HEARING.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: MOWING THE GRASS, TRIMMING THE WEEDS?
>> YES, MA'AM. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: IT HAS
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANY --
>> I WILL NOTE THAT THERE IS NO RESPONDENT PRESENT THIS MORNIN .
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTED BUT HAS BEEN CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING AND THAT THE VIOLATOR WILL BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT PER FLORIDA STATUTE 162.06 (3), THAT ANY REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BEING ASSESSED. THANK YOU.
[O. 19-1017 CE 1205 Avenue M Moore, Sam Heather Debevec]
>>THE CLERK: CASE 50 -19 1217 -1912 1712 05 AVENUE M, SAM MOORE.
PLEASE, STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, SIR? (WHEREUPON, THE WITNESS WAS
SWORN.). >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THANK
YOU. >> HEALTHER DEBEVEC CITY FORT PIERCE CODE ENFORCEMENT. CASE NO.: 19- 017, 12:05 P.M. AVENUE M, SAM MOORE.
SECTION 16-46, 47, 48 OUTSIDE STORAGE; 16-46, 47, 48 OUTSOURCER -- OUTSIDE STORAGE INDOOR FORAGER. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS REMOVE VARIOUS ITEMS ALONG THE FENCE, BUCKETS DRUGS CONTAINERS AND OTHER LOOSE ITEMS FROM THE FRONT YARD.
REMOVE INDOOR OFFICE/CAFETERIA CHAIR FROM THE FRONT YARD. THE CITY REQUEST THAT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS THE BOILER BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $50 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. I HAVE PHOTOS TO PRESENT.
MR. MOORE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THEM.
>> TO THE PHOTOS DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> AT THIS TIME WE WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOS AS CITY'S COMPOSITE 1.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THANK YOU.
>> YOU HAVE SEEN THESE PHOTOS, CORRECT?
>> YES MR. MOORE, DID YOU BRING SOMEONE WITH YOU TODAY TO HELP YOU TO SPEAK ON YOUR BEHALF.
>> ABOUT MY SON. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE HIM
SWORN AND SO HE CAN SPEAK? >> YES.
(WHEREUPON, THE WITNESS WAS SWORN.).
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THESE PHOTOS WILL BE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AS THE CITIES COMPOSITE EGGS IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE PHOTOGRAPHS OR SPECIAL
MAGISTRATE. >> HEATHER, WHICH IS THIS?
[00:50:13]
OKAY. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OH,
GOODNESS. >> MOST OF THAT IS CLEANED UP.
WHEN ARE THOSE PICTURES? >> THAT ONE WAS FROM JULY 25.
THAT WAS TOWARD THE BEGINNING. WHEN I PUT MY PHOTOS IN HERE.
>> YES THIS IS BEEN CLEANED UP. >> LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT YESTERDAY'S PHOTOS? OKAY.
>> SO THERE IS STILL A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF ITEMS OUT HERE.
YOU ARE INDICATING THAT THIS IS ALL -- HAS ALL BEEN REMOVED.
>> IS GOING TO BE REMOVED. >> TALK INTO THE MICROPHONE SO
WE CAN HEAR YOU. >> I JUST SEEN SOMETHING.
>> DO YOU -- WELL -- I NEED SEVEN MORE DAYS.
>> OKAY. YOU WANT A CONTINUANCE FOR SEVEN DAYS.
>> 10 MORE DAYS TO FINISH CLEANING UP THE REST OF THEM. I DIDN'T CLEAN UP ALL OF THEM.
I NEED SEVEN MORE DAYS TO CLEAN UP THE REST OF IT.
>> WE CONTINUE THE CASE FOR SEVEN DAYS AND THE CITY WILL COME AND INSPECTED?
>> RIGHT. >> IF IT'S NOT IN COMPLIANCE, IT WILL BE RESET AT THE HEARING IN SEVEN DAYS FROM NOW.
>> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR COMING IN.
>> AM NOT WORRIED ABOUT THAT. MORE ABOUT THE STUFF AROUND IT.
>> OKAY. >> I JUST NEED A PHONE NUMBER FOR YOU, MR. MOORE.
[P. 19-2988 VR 336 Fernandina Street Delaunay, Deborah Heather Debevec]
>>THE CLERK: NEXT IS 5 P 19-2988, 336 FERNANDINA STREET, DELONGHI.
HEALTHER DEBEVEC CITY FOR PEACE CODE ENFORCEMENT. OWNED BY DELAUNAY.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON NOVEMBER 6, 2019. FOR 22-22 ALLOWED USES.
REMOVE ALL ADS, CANCEL RESERVATIONS AND STOP RENTING. THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION WAS EXISTED, BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING, THAT THE VIOLATOR BE PUT ON NOTICE PER STATE STATUTE 106.06 SUBSECTION 3, THAT A REPEAT OF THE VIOLATIONS WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BEING ASSESSED.
>> WAS IS A VACATION RENTAL? >> YES, MA'AM.
I APOLOGIZE. IT WAS A SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL.
>> THAT WAS RENTED IN VIOLATION OF THE EXISTING CODE, CORRECT.
>> YES, MA'AM. IN THE ADS HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
>> AND ADVERTISING I WOULD SAY AS WELL IN VIOLATION OF THE EXISTING CODE.
>> THE AD HAS BEEN REMOVED. >> THANK YOU.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: I FIND THE VIOLATION WAS EXISTED BUT WAS CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING AND THAT THE VIOLATOR WILL BE PUT ON NOTICE PER FLORIDA STATUTE 162.06 (3), THAT A REPEAT OF THE VIOLATION WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS AND PENALTIES BEING ASSESSED.
[Q. 19-2698 CE 610 El Rancho Drive Webb (EST) Heather Debevec]
>>THE CLERK: 5 Q, CASE NO.: 19- 2698, 610 L RANCHO DRIVE, MR. WEBB.
>> HEALTHER DEBEVEC CITY OF FORT PEACE ÃPEERS CODE ENFORCEMENT.
19-2698. THE CASE WAS INITIATED OCTOBER 16, 2019.
IT WAS FOR SECTION 16-46, 47, 48 SUBSECTION 1 AND FIVE OUTSIDE STORAGE.
SECTION 22-187 SUBSECTION 13, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. BRING IN OR REPLACE SHED,
[00:55:07]
BARRELS, BUCKETS TOOLS DOCUMENT OTHER LOOSE ITEMS FROM THE CARPORT.MOLLY YARD AND CLEAN OFF THE FENCE LINE. THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $50 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. THERE ARE PHOTOS TO SUBMIT.
>> DO THE PHOTOS DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THE CITY WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOS AS COMPOSITE 1 AND I WILL NOTE THAT THERE IS NO RESPONDENT PRESENT THIS MORNIN
. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: HAS THERE
BEEN ANY CONTACT. >> I DID SPEAK WITH THE GENTLEMAN WHO SAID THAT HE HAD BEEN A TENANT THEY ARE AND HE HAD STOPPED THERE, BUT HE WAS NOT CURRENTLY STAYING THERE AS THERE WAS NO ELECTRICITY TO THE RESIDENCE.
HE DID NOT GO INTO DETAIL OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE. HE HAD SAID THAT HE WOULD REMOVE STUFF AND NO. THERE HAVE BEEN NO CHANGES TO THE PROPERTY OTHER THAN ORGANIZING SOME OF THE STUFF OUT OF THE CARPORT AS YOU WILL SEE IN THE PHOTOS.
>> IS THAT A NOTICE THAT IS IN THE DOOR?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THE NOTICE WAS THERE WHEN I WENT BACK TO CHECK. IT WAS HANGING FROM THE FRONT DOOR.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: DOES THE CITY ATTORNEY HAVE ANY.
>> NO, MA'AM. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY.
THE PICTURES WILL BE ENTERED AS CITY'S COMPOITE 1. AND I WILL FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $50 PER DAY
WILL BE ASSESSED THEREAFTER. >>THE CLERK: 5 R, MR. BURKE.
[R. 19-2686 CE 601 El Rancho Drive Burke, John Heather Debevec]
>> EXCUSE ME. STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
>> JOHN BURKE. >>THE CLERK: (WHEREUPON, THE
>>THE CLERK: THANK YOU. >> HEALTHER DEBEVEC.
THIS IS CASE NO.: 19-2686. 6010 RANCHO DRIVE OWNED BY JOHN BURKE.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 15, 2019. IT WAS FOR SECTION 10-23 SUBSECTION S, PARKING PROHIBITED ON CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
SECTION 1646, 47, 48 PARKING ON OTHER THAN PAVEMENT. SECTION 16-46, 47, 48, NON-OPERABLE VEHICLES. WE ARE REQUESTING THE PARKED VEHICLES IN THE DRIVEWAY BESIDE OR THE REAR OF THE HOME. REFRAIN FROM PARKING IN THE FRONT YARD.
REMOVE UNREGISTERED VEHICLES. THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS FOR NONOPERATIVE VEHICLES, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN FIVE DAYS TO COMPLY. IF THE VIOLATION IS NOT CORRECTED WITHIN THE TIME GIVEN, THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO REMEDY THE VIOLATIONS.
THE COST OF TOWING AND ANY IMPOUND FEES WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE VEHICLE OWNER.
HE HAS REMOVED QUITE A FEW OF THE VEHICLES. I BELIEVE THAT THE ONLY THING LEFT IN THE FRONT YARD THAT IS UNREGISTERED IS A UTILITY TRAILER, WHICH, WHEN I SPOKE TO MR. BURKE THIS MORNING I SHOWED THE PICTURES WITH HIM AS WE SPOKE.
HE SAID HE CAN HAVE THE TRAILER MOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. >> OKAY.
I'M GOING TO CONTINUE JUDGMENT WOULD YOU -- I CAN CONTINUE THIS FOR SEVEN DAYS SO SHE CAN
COME BACK OUT AND CHECK. >> THAT'S FINE.
>> AND THEN IF EVERYTHING IS OKAY, THEN YOU WOULD BE CONSIDERED IN COMPLIANCE OTHERWISE HE WOULD BE BACK HERE A WEEK FROM TODAY.
THANK YOU. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, SINCE WE ARE HERE CAN WE GO AHEAD AND MAKE SURE THE PHOTOS ARE PART OF THE FILE? CAN WE GO AHEAD AND MOVE THOSE AS AN EXHIBIT.
>> I BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE SIX PHOTOS THAT WILL BE ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE IN THE COMPOSITE
>> THANK YOU, SIR. >> NEXT IS 6 A. THIS IS A
[A. 14-2086 Req to stop fines 1404 Edgewood Terrace White, Johnny Heather Debevec ]
MASSIVE READING. CASE 14 -- 1404 EDGEWOOD TERRACE, WHITE.[01:00:06]
P >> (WHEREUPON, THE WITNESS WAS SWORN.).
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE I'LL BE PRESENTING YESTERDAY. SO THIS IS CASE NO.: 14-2086 AND IS BEFORE YOU FOR YOUR QUEST TO STOP THE ACUTE MARGINAL FINES.
THE ADDRESS IS 1404 EDGEWOOD TERRACE, WHICH IS OWNED BY MR. JOHNNY WHITE.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED OCTOBER 20, 2014. IT WAS OWNED BY MR. CHARLES ALL OF. OF NORTH 13 STREET IN FORT PIERCE.
THE VIOLATIONS WERE PERMIT REQUIRED IN PROPERTY MAINTENANCE.
THIS PROPERTY WAS SOLD AS A TAX DEED SALE. WE DID RECEIVE ACCESS TASKS SALE PROCEEDS, WHICH WERE -- THE CITY WILL ONCE THE PROPERTY IS IN COMPLIANCE SATISFY THE LIEN. HOWEVER, WE CANNOT DO THAT UNTIL THE PROPERTY IS BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE. SO THIS OR WHAT IS ASKING YOU TO STOP THE ACCUMULATION OF FINES ALLOWING HIM TIME TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.
AFTER WHICH, WE WILL WORK WITH HIM ON RESOLVING BILLING THAT IS ON THE PROPERTY.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: I SEE THERE'S A RECOMMENDATION. IS THAT WHAT YOU -- I CAN'T
READ IT. >> IT'S JUST TO BE DETERMINED
(LAUGHING). >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: ALL RIGHT. (LAUGHING) I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE.
THE FINES WILL BE STOPPED AS OF --
>> BUT WILL WE WILL ASK IS THAT YOU PUT A DATE CERTAIN TO BE STOPPED FOR THREE MONTHS -- MR. WHITE, DO YOU KNOW HOW LONG IT WILL TAKE YOU TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE?
>> NOW, THAT I DO NOT KNOW BECAUSE I'VE GOT A BLUEPRINT HERE.
I'VE READ ON THE WHOLE BUILDING. SO IT'S GOING TO TAKE TIME WITH THE WHOLE BUILDING TO BE REDID. IN THE PROCESS NOW GETTING PERMITS.
I'VE GOT THE BLUEPRINT OF WHAT'S GOING TO BE DID.
>> OKAY. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: WHAT IS THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT YOU THINK YOU NEED AND WHAT IS THE CITY -- WHAT DOES THE CITY
>> STAFF IS GOING TO ASK FOR THE FINES TO BE HELD IN ABEYANCE FOR 90 DAYS.
TO ALLOW TIME FOR MR. WHITE TO GET THE PERMITS. WE CAN REVISIT AT 90 DAYS.
>> OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING.
>> SO IN 90 DAYS, WE WILL COME BACK HERE AND WE WILL PROVIDE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HOPEFULLY, WITH A COPY OF A PERMIT SHOWING THAT WORK IS GETTING DONE AND THEN SHE CAN CONTINUE THE ABEYANCE ADDITIONAL TIME AFTER THAT BUT RIGHT NOW WILL DO 90 DAYS AND WE WILL COME BACK. THE FINES WILL BE STOPPED FOR 90 DAYS IF THAT'S WHAT THE
>> EXCUSE ME. THEN AFTER 90 DAYS, YOU ALL WILL DETERMINE WHAT THE FINE WILL BE? OR WHAT?
>> WE CANNOT DO THAT UNTIL THE PROPERTY IS FULLY IN COMPLIANCE.
SO, THERE WAS DAMAGE TO THE ROOF, WALLS, WINDOWS AND DOORS. WE WILL WORK WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO FIND OUTO WHEN Y WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE. BUT WE CAN'T ADDRESS THE LIEN
UNTIL IT IS IN COMPLIANCE. >> THE REASON I'M ASKING, BECAUSE FOR THE FIND THAT YOU ALL GOD, THE PROPERTY WOULD NEVER BE WORTH THAT MUCH.
SO I'M TRYING TO DECIDE WHETHER TO THROW MY HANDS UP IN THE -- TAKE THE LOSS AND LET YOU DEAL
NO. WE HAVE ACCESS PROCEEDS, WHICH WILL -- WE WILL BE HAPPY TO ACCEPT TO SETTLE THE LIEN. THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL MONEY OUT OF POCKET FOR THE LIEN. BUT I CAN'T DO THAT UNTIL THE PROPERTY IS IN COMPLIANCE.
>> OKAY. AS LONG AS UNDERSTAND THAT PART.
>> WE ARE HAPPY TO ACCEPT WHAT WE RECEIVED IN THE EXCESS TAX SALE, BUT I CAN'T RESOLVE THE LIEN UNTIL THE PROPERTY IS IN COMPLIANCE. SO THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL OUT-OF-POCKET MONEY FOR THE LIEN.
>> OKAY. >> OKAY? SO WHAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IS DOING IS STOPPING THE ACCUMULATION OF FINES FOR 90 DAYS, GIVING HER TIME TO GET YOUR PERMIT, PARDON ME. IN 90 DAYS WE WILL COME BACK.
HOPEFULLY YOU WILL SHOW THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE A PERMIT. THEN SHE CAN CONTINUE THAT ABEYANCE, OKAY. BUT WE WILL TAKE BABY STEPS. 90 DAYS AT A TIME, OKAY? SO HOPEFULLY 90 DAYS WE WILL COME BACK AND WILL HAVE A PERMIT IN HAND AND WORK BE DONE. YOU COULD BE EVEN IN COMPLIANCE.
I DON'T HELP OUT SUGAR WORK. >> OKAY.
I DON'T WANT TO THROW GOOD MONEY ABOUT MONEY.
[01:05:03]
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. IN 90 DAYS HE FINDS WILL BE STOPPED FOR 90 DAYS AND WE WILL
BE REVISITING IT BASICALLY. >> ALL RIGHT.
THANK YOU. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THANK
YOU, SIR. >> HE WILL STAY IN CONTACT WITH MS. COLLEEN FOR ANY UPDATES THAT YOU HAVE.
>> WHICH ONE IS CALLING? OH, THAT YOU. THAT'S HEATHER.
>> ALL RIGHT THEN. >> ALL RIGHT THEN.
THANK YOU. >>THE CLERK: OUR LAST CASES
[A. 18-2160CE 2009 S US Highway 1 Morris/Satnick FP Assoc LLC Heather Debevec]
NUMBER 10 A 18-2160, 2009 S. US HIGHWAY ONE, MORRIS FP ASSOCIATES LLC.(WHEREUPON, THE WITNESS WAS SWORN.).
>> I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THIS A FEW MOMENTS TO TRY TO CLARIFY THE LAST ORDER THAT WAS WRITTEN. WE LOOKED AT THIS PROPERTY, THE OLD KMART PLAZA, 211 , 2111 AS A SEPARATE TAX MAP FROM TWO , 2111 AS A SEPARATE TAX MAP FROM 2009.
THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT MATS BUT WE LOOKED AT IT FOR ONE PARCEL FOR THE BASIS.
WE'VE OBTAINED THE ROOF PERMIT. WE ARE STARTING ON THAT TODAY 42111.
THESE ITEMS ADDRESS 2009 WHICH WAS A SEPARATE PARCEL. AND IN READING ITEM D, IT SAYS PAINT THE BUILDING, REPAIR AND REPLACE THE MISSING DAMAGED STUCCO.
AND THE GUTTERS AROUND THE BUILDING AND REPLACE THE MISSING COVERS, AND THE ROOF -- AFTER THE ROOF -- ROOF REPAIR IS REPORT ÃREPAIRED IT RELATES TO 2111.
ITEM NUMBER TWO AN EVENT THE VIOLATION IS NOT REMEDIED WITHIN 45 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THERE SHALL BE A FINE. WHAT CONFUSED ME INITIALLY WAS THE ROOF REPAIR IS NOT GOING TO BE DONE IN 45 DAYS. THAT WOULD TAKE ANYWHERE FROM 3 TO 4 MONTHS STARTING PROBABLY NEXT WEEK, THIS WEEK AND MAYBE MARCH OR APRIL.
I WAS CONFUSED WITH THE TWO ITEMS BEING COMBINED IS DUE TO BE A FINE ISSUE IF THE ROOF WASN'T DONE. THE OTHER ISSUE WAS WE WENT OUT AND WE HAVE OBTAINED A BID TO PAINT THE BUILDING, OKAY,TOO FIX THE STUCCO REPAIR. THERE ARE 17 ITEMS OF STUCCO AND WOOD REPAIRS ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING RELATING JUST TO 2009, TOTALING ABOUT $23,000. OKAY? WE PLAN TO DO THAT, BUT NOT UNTIL THE ROOF IS COMPLETED, OKAY? AND THE KMART FRONT, WHICH IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS, WHICH IS 2111, IS LOOKED AT FOR COMPLETION FOR NEW TENANTS.
>> OKAY. SO, WHAT WE NEED TO DO -- THE SAME THING IS HAPPENING AGAIN.
YOU'RE DISCUSSING 2111. AND WE NEED TO NOT DISCUSS THAT PROPERTY AT ALL.
WE NEED TO FOCUS SOLELY ON 2009 S. U.S. HIGHWAY ONE. JUST THAT.
WERE GOING TO RESTRICT THIS CONVERSATION DO JUST THAT ADDRESS.
WHAT I'M GOING TO RECOMMEND, HEATHER, THE PHOTOS ARE THERE IN THE SYSTEM.
WHY DON'T WE PULL UP THE PHOTOS AND HEATHER CAN EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT WE CITED AND WHAT OUR EXPECTATIONS ARE SO THAT YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT WE ARE ASKING YOU TO DO 22009.
>> CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION? >> SURE.
>> OKAY. AS A MATTER OF PRACTICALITY, WE MIGHT BE DOING WORK ON 2111 THAT WILL COORDINATE WAS TO 01 NOT -- THAT'S WHERE WE WERE CONFUSED AS TO KNOW WHAT YOU'RE SAYING HAS TO BE DONE, BUT THE COORDINATION OF THE WORK AND THE TIMEFRAME TO GET THAT DONE.
>> YOU CAN IDENTIFY THAT AS WE BRING THE PHOTOS UP. LET'S BRING THE PHOTOS UP
FIRST. >> I CAN GIVE YOU OUR PHOTOS AND LIST OF THE WORK IF YOU WOULD LIKE.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THERE'S A LOT OF THEM. OKAY.
>> THERE'S A LOT OF PHOTOS. >> SO HEATHER, WILL JUST USE
THE NOVEMBER PHOTOS. >> THAT'S ALL THAT I PUT IN THERE BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THIS HAS TO DO WITH, WAS THE NOVEMBER CASE.
>> OKAY. >> SO THIS IS THE PHOTOS FROM
NOVEMBER 1. >> AND THEY WERE SUBMITTED IN WITH THE CASE. EVERYTHING'S BEEN DONE FROM THE PREVIOUS HEARING.
>> SO THIS IS 2009 US WHEN SHOWING POWER WASHING AND REPAIR.
[01:10:03]
>> YES, MA'AM. >> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE IN
>> THAT ONE BECAUSE OF THE TREE AND MINOR STUCCO REPAIR WORK.
>> PRESSURE WASHING. >> THIS IS THE OLD WINN-DIXIE PLAZA. I KNOW THAT HE HAS PHOTOS AND HE SAYS SOME WORK HAD BEEN DONE AT THIS WHERE THEY WERE PUTTING UP THE METAL REPLACING IT. TO THE EXTENT OF THAT, I HAVE NOT BEEN OUT TO CHECK TO BE HONEST.
>> CAN I COMMENT? WHAT'S ONE SECOND.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: YOU CAN BUT LET HER FINISH.
>> BUT AS YOU CAN SEE FROM LOOKING AT 2009 YOU WILL SEE THAT THERE IS SIGNIFICANT STUCCO REPAIR AND DRYWALL REPAIR AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY. SO THIS IS PART OF 2009?
>> YES. EVERYTHING IN HERE IS FROM 2009.
>> OKAY. >> THAT WAS PERMITTED.
IN COMPLETED. >> AND WAS COMPLETED.
>> SO HEATHER. >> HE DID HAVE A PERMIT.
HE PROVIDED THAT WITHIN A COUPLE OF DAYS IT WAS BEFORE THE END OF THE WEEK.
>>. >> ANOTHER SHOWING THE SAME THINGS AS TO WHERE SOME OF THE TRIM HAD BEEN PULLED OFF. THIS IS WHERE YOU'RE HAVING SOME OF THE TREE IN THE STUCCO RIGHT THERE.
>> AND NOW THIS IS THE PART THAT WAS REPAIR THE WE JUST DISCUSSED.
>> THE TOP PART WAS REPAIRED. >> DO KNOW IF THIS HAS BEEN
CORRECTED? >> THAT HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED.
>> OKAY. THAT IS SHOW WHERE THE TREE IS COMING OUT OF THE SOFFIT.
>> THAT HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED. >> OKAY.
>> THESE PHOTOS WERE SUBMITTED PRIOR. THIS IS SHOWING THE STUCCO
>> AT THE WINN-DIXIE. >> WE REMOVED THE HARDY BOARD AND APPLIED STUCCO. TWO BY SIX AND THREE BY SIX STUCCO REPAIR.
WE HAVE ALL FULL LIST OF EVERY SINGLE ITEM THAT NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: WE ARE SEEING PHOTOS OF THE STUCCO REPAIR.
>> YES. >> THAT'S THE SAME THING I JUST
READ. >> THAT'S ALL PART OF PAINT.
>> THIS IS THE BACK OF THE BUILDING FROM WHAT I CAN TELL AND THIS JUST REQUIRES PRESSURE
WASHING AND PAINT. >> YES, MA'AM.
>> OUR PLAN IS ONLY TO PRESSURE WASH AT THIS TIME. ONLY BECAUSE WE DO NOT KNOW WE MIGHT BE CUTTING DOORS AND SO FORTH. SO WE WILL WHEN THIS IS DONE, AT THE END, WE WILL PRESSURE WASH IT AS BEST WE CAN.
>> WE WILL PAINT THE FRONT OF A BUILDING SO FROM THE STREET LEVEL.
THAT AND THE SIDEWALKS WILL SO FROM THE FRONT IT WILL ALL BE CLEAN UP.
>> THIS IS THE SAME. IT'S ALL PRETTY MUCH FROM THE BACK OF THE BUILDING THAT'S ALL YOU CAN SEE IS PRESSURE WASHING PAGE. FOR THE 2009 SECTION OF THIS
PLAZA. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: OKAY.
>> WAS JUST GOING TO ONLY PHOTOS.
>>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: SIR, WHAT I CAN SEE IS A REQUEST FOR PRESSURE WASHING THE BACK, REPAIRING THE STUCCO IN PAINTING THE FRONT.
>> YES. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: HEATHER,
IS THAT CORRECT? >> AM I MISSING ANYTHING.
>> I WAS REQUESTING TO HAVE THE BACK PAINTED AS WELL BECAUSE THERE'S OTHER PROPERTIES THAT CAN DO IT FROM THE BACKSIDE. THERE ARE APARTMENTS.
SIR, WHAT WAS YOUR NAME? I DID NOT WRITE IT DOWN.
>> PETER. >> PETER? HOW LONG WOULD YOU NEED TO PRESSURE WASH THE BACK, PAINT THE FRONT AND DO THE STUCCO
REPAIR ON THE FRONT? >> I WOULD PROBABLY NOT WANT TO -- I'M GOING TO TALK VERBATIM -- NOT WANT TO DO THAT UNTIL I FINISH THE ROOF ONLY TO 11 BUILDING, WHICH YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT IN THE ASBESTOS REMOVAL AND THERE.
BECAUSE I MIGHT BE DOING THE FRONT OF THE KMART AT THE SAME TIME I PAID THIS.
SO I WOULD SAY AT LEAST UNTIL APRIL/MAY TO REPEAT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING AND DO THE PRESSURE WASHING. I MIGHT DO THE STUCCO REPAIRS NOW -- I'LL DO THE STUCCO
[01:15:02]
REPAIRS FOR THE INTEGRITY OF THE BUILDING, RIGHT? WERE YOU HAVE -- OF LISTED THE COLUMN REPAIRS AND STUCCO WITH THEIR MISSING STUFF. BUT THE PAINTING, WE WOULD LIKE TO HOLD OFF UNTIL AT LEAST UNTIL WE FINISH THE KMART ROOF IN THE ASBESTOS AND WHATEVER WE DECIDE TO DO FOR KMART. I WILL SAY APRIL, MAY.>> WE HAVE GONE OUT. >> ON NOVEMBER 15, WE DID GO OUT AND OBTAINED OUR FIRST BIDDING GETTING OTHER BIDS TO DO THE WORK.
AND SO IT'S NOT LIKE WE WERE LISTING EVERYTHING IN DETAIL. I'D BE GLAD TO SUBMIT THIS AND SEND AN EMAIL OF IT TO YOU SEE CAN HAVE IT FOR THE RECORD.
>> OKAY. THAT WOULD BE APPRECIATED TO ADD TO THE FILE.
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, AFTER HEARING THIS DISCUSSION WE HAD, THE STAFF UNDERSTANDS THE REQUEST TO POSTPONE THE PAINTING, BUT WE ARE GOING TO ASK THE OWNER -- WITH A REPRESENTATIVE -- WHICH ARE TITLE?
>> PETER. >> PETER FELDMAN -- AND YOU ARE
THE OWNER OF THE BUSINESS? >> I REPRESENT THE OWNER.
>> WHAT WE ARE GOING TO ASK IS THAT THE PRESSURE WASHING IN STUCCO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 90 DAYS, THE REPAIR. THE STUCCO REPAIR IN THE PRESSURE WASHER BEING IN 90 DAYS AND THAT THE PAINTING, ONLY, BE POSTPONED FOR SIX MONTHS HUNDRED 20 DAYS TO COMPLETE THE PAINTING, 90 DAYS TO COMPLETE THE STUCCO REPAIR AND THE PRESSURE WASHING.
>> WAY. LET ME -- 90 DAYS TO COMPLETE THE STUCCO REPAIR AND THE
PRESSURE WASHING. >> ON THE BACK.
>> WELL IT'S THE SIDES AND THE BACK BE PRESSURE WASHING. 90 DAYS FOR THE PRESSURE WASHING AND STUCCO REPAIR. 180 DAYS FOR THE PAINTING OF THE BUILDING.
>> CAN ASK ONE ITEM? CAN WE START THE 180 DAYS THIS HOLIDAY -- NO ONE'S WORKING, STARTED IN JANUARY 1 OR SECOND. IT'S HARD TO GET PEOPLE MOBILIZED.
IF I COULD HAVE THE EXTRA THREE WEEKS? I MEAN, A PARTY GONE OUT GOT IN
THE BIDS. >> LET'S GO WITH A DATE CERTAIN. I WAS ASKING FOR 90 DAYS WHICH WOULD GO FROM DECEMBER.
>> TO THE FIRST WEEK OF JANUARY.
>> WHATEVER WE SAID WE'VE DONE IS JUST I'M SITTING HERE WAITING IN HER ENGINEERING YOU ARE ON VACATION TO GET A PERMIT FOR WAWA. IT'S NOT JUST ALL THESE PEOPLE STOP WORK DECEMBER 15. I DON'T, BUT THEY DO (LAUGHING .
>> YES. YES. BECAUSE THE PRESSURE WASHING IN THE STUCCO REPAIR I THINK PERSONALLY, THIS IS THE STAFF'S POINT OF VIEW WE CAN BE COMPLETED FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY AND FEBRUARY. STAFF WOULD ASK FOR THOSE TWO ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED BY MARCH 14. JUST TO GIVE US A DATE CERTAIN INSTEAD OF A 90 DAY 80 DAY BY MARCH 14. AND THEN, JUNE 30 FOUR THE PAINTING IS WHAT THE STAFF IS REQUESTING.
>> THAT'S FINE. WE WILL MAKE IT HAPPEN. .
I JUST KNOW WHAT HAPPENS THIS TIME OF THE YEAR. BY MARCH 14.
>> STUCCO AND PRESSURE. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: STUCCO REPAIR AND PRESSURE WASHING WILL BE DONE IN BE IN COMPLIANCE BY JUNE 30 FOR THE
>> WILL THE PAINTING OF THE BUILDING. IT SHOULD BE IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE -- 2111. >> WHETHER TO 11 IS READY OR NOT BY JUNE 30, WE WILL PAINT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING WHETHER KMART IS PREPARED FOR IT OR NOT. IN OTHER WORDS, WE WILL LEAVE TO 11 OUT OF IT.
EVERYTHING NORTH OF TO 11 WILL BE PAINTED BY JUNE 30.
>> WHAT I WAS GOING TO ASK, BECAUSE HE -- NOT TO BRING IT UP, BUT THE BACKSIDE OF THE 2011 BUILDING IS NOT IN AS BAD SHAPE AS THE 2009 BUILDING AS YOU CAN SEE BY THE MARKS ON THE BACK OF THE SECTION. THAT'S WHY HE WAS REQUESTING THE PAINTING.
[01:20:05]
I THINK THE PRESSURE WASHING WOULD HELP IT, BUT I HAVE A FEELING THE BACK OF THE 2009, THE PRESSURE WASHING IS NOT GOING TO TAKE CARE OF ALL THOSE MARKS.>> WILL LET US TRY PRESSURE WASHING AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS.
>> YES. >> IN THE BACK OF THE TO 11 BUILDING, WE HAVE TWO POSSIBLE TENANTS THAT WERE GOING TO CUT REAR DELIVERY DOORS INTO.
SO WE CAN -- CELL BUT LET US TRY PRESSURE WASHING FIRST AND IF IT DOESN'T WORK, WERE TRYING TO COOPERATE WITH THE COMMUNITY, WE WILL COME BACK AND WE WILL TALK TO HEATHER AND
SEE WHAT WE CAN DO. >> COMMUNICATING WITH HEATHER
IS A KEY PART OF THIS. >> WHILE WE TRY TO.
>> HE'S BEEN GOOD ABOUT THAT, I CAN SAY.
>> WILL I WILL SEND YOU A COPY THIS.
>> I'M SORRY FOR INTERRUPTING. I WANT TO MAKE SURE FOR PROCEDURAL PURPOSES I THINK THIS MAY HAVE COME ACROSS AS A MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION. I THINK IT SHOULD BE A MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL ORDER.
>> IS A REQUEST TO AMEND. >> OKAY.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT WE WILL SUBMIT.
>> WE WILL SUBMIT AN AMENDED ORDER.
>> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
SOUNDS GOOD TO ME. OKAY. WE NEED ANY.
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PATIENCE.
>> THANK YOU, SIR. >>THE CLERK: THAT IS ALL OF THE
CASES FOR TODAY. >>SPECIAL MAGISTRATE: THERE IS
NOTHING ELSE? >> WE JUST ASK HOW THE PARTIES WERE NOTICED FOR THOSE WHO DID NOT APPEAR THIS MORNING.
>>THE CLERK: FOR CASES REQUIRING A HEARING PER STATE STATUE 162-12 A NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE VIOLATOR CERTIFIED MAIL. IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED SIGNED, IT IS PLACED IN THE FILE. IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED OR UNCLAIMED AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING WITH THE NOTICE OF HEARING ENCLOSED IS SENT TO THE VIOLATOR REGULAR U.S. MAIL. 10 DAYS TO THE HEARING THE NOTICES POSTED ON CITY HALL. A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING. IF THE GREEN CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING, THE POSTING IS COMPLETED IN THE SAME MANNER AS IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED. FOR CASES NOT MANDATED BY STATE STATUTE, MAILING OF THE NOTICE OF HEARING ARE HANDLED IN THE SAME MANNER STATED PRIOR.
IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED UNCLAIMED OR NOT RETURNED WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE HEARING, A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD AT CITY HALL.
>> THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.