[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:06]
>> I CALL THIS SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING OF JANUARY 6, 2021 TO ORDER. IF WE COULD PLEASE RISE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
WE HAVE ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS. WANT TO JUST DO THE OATH?
>> OK. AND WE WILL ADMINISTER THE OATH
[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
TO THE DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES. >> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT-HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
>> KATIE -- >> DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
[B. IDENTIFICATION OF CASES IN COMPLIANCE OR RESCHEDULED]
>> IDENTIFICATION OF CASES THAT ARE IN COMPLIANCE OR
WE HAVE CASE 201321, 215 NORTH SECOND STEED BOWDEN, IT'S COMPLIED. AND WE HAVE 201058, 1400 BENNY
DRIVE PHILLIPS, WE'VE PULLED IT. >> PUBLIC HEARINGS, VIOLATION
CASES. >> WE ARE DOING FIRST -- WANT TO
>> YOU WANT TO DO THE ONES THAT AREN'T HERE FIRST AND THEN DO
THE TELEPHONE? >> YES. LET'S GO AHEAD AND DO
AND THESE NEXT TWO -- LET'S SEE. ONE, TWO -- THREE CASES WILL BE CONTINUED FOR THE NEXT HEARING DATE.
AND THAT WILL BE CASE 201345, 1706 NORTH 18TH STREET, MORRIS. CASE 201254, 1711 NORTH 19TH STREET KEITH. 202662, 1234 SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE, FELANO.
>> OK. SO THEN THE REST OF THEM ARE ALL
>> WE HAVE TWO R AND D ORDERS WE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST.
>> OK. >> HEATHER, YOU WANT TO PRESENT THOSE?
>> REQUESTED THE R AND DS FIRST?
>> YEAH I'M DOING THEM FIRST. >> GOOD MORNING, SPECIAL
[E. 20-1388 CE R&D ORDER 221 Osceola Avenue Carroll. Karen Heather Debevec]
>> THIS IS 201388 FOR 221 OCEOLA AVENUE OWNED BY KAREN CAROL.
SUBSECTIONS 1, 5, NUISANCES AND OBJECT OUTSIDE STORAGE.
WE WERE REQUESTED R AND D FOR THAT.
>> OK. COULD YOU -- ARE YOU GOING TO BE
PULLING THESE UP, UP HERE? >> OH, I'M SORRY.
>> SO, JUST A COUPLE QUESTIONS. JUST TO BE CLEAR FOR THE RECORD.
WERE THE RESPONDENTS GIVEN NOTICE TO COME HERE THIS MORNING? OR HAVE YOU HAD ANY
COMMUNICATION WITH THEM? >> I HAD HAD COMMUNICATION I THINK WITH SOME OF THE TENANTS DURING THIS CASE.
NONE GAVE ANY INDICATION OF APPEARING HERE.
COLLEEN WOULD HAVE SENT OUT THE NOTICES, AS I LOOK THROUGH HERE, I DID POST THE PROPERTIES, SO SHE DID NOT GET A GREEN CARD BACK BECAUSE I DO HAVE A POSTING FROM THE 17TH.
>> OK. SO BASICALLY BY R AND D YOU ARE ASKING THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE TO FIND A VIOLATION DID EXIST, BUT THAT IT HAS BEEN CURED. CORRECT? OK. NOW THE VIOLATIONS, ARE THEY RELATED TO THE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT YOU PROVIDED HERE?
>> YES, MA'AM. IT WAS FOR THE OUTSIDE STORAGE, IF YOU WILL LOOK WHERE THE CAMPER AND THE SHED IS, THERE IS A BUNCH OF STUFF BETWEEN THE FENCE AND --
>> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DISPLAY WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WE WOULD LIKE TO FORMALLY MOVE THE PHOTOS IN AS CITY'S ONE COMPOSITE.
>> THERE ARE THREE PHOTOS THAT WILL BE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AS
THE CITY'S COMPOSITE 1. >> THANK YOU.
[00:05:01]
IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THIS PARTICULARI FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTED, BUT IT HAS BEEN CURED.
AND IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE THAT I NEED TO ORDER?
>> SO GENERALLY SPEAKING, WE GENERALLY WOULD PUT THE RESPONDENTS ON NOTICE THAT BASED ON THE EXISTENCE OF THIS R AND D ORDER THEY CAN BE SUBJECT TO HIGHER FINES IN THE FUTURE IF A SUBSEQUENT VIOLATION HAS BEEN FOUND.
>> OK. AND THAT CAN GO IN THE ORDER?
>> I'M NOT SURE IF OUR STANDARD ORDER HAS THAT LANGUAGE BUT TO THE EXTENT IT DOES IT WOULD BE INCLUDED THERE.
>> OK. OK THEN YEAH USUALLY IT'S ON THE
>> IT'S NOT THERE SO -- OK. THEN CASE 201389, SAME ADDRESS.
[F. 20-1389 CE R&D ORDER 221 Osceola Avenue Carroll, Karen Heather Debevec]
CASE NUMBER 201389, 221 OCEOLA AVENUE, KAREN CAROL.
THIS WAS FOR IPM3, 304.2, PROTECTIVE TREATMENT.
REQUESTED THAT THEY PAINT A BRICK PLANTER AND WALL ON THE WESTERN NORTH FACING WALL. THEY DID PAINT IT.
I DO HAVE PHOTOS. WE ARE REQUESTING R AND D ALSO.
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> AT THIS TIME WE WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOS IN AS CITY'S 1 COMPOSITE.
>> THANK YOU. >> AND IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE PHOTOS IN REGARD TO THE R AND D?
>> NO, MA'AM. >> PHOTO, BOTH PHOTOS WILL BE ENTERED AS THE CITY'S COMPOSITE 1.
>> AND AGAIN, THE SAME QUESTION AS TO NOTICE, BECAUSE THERE'S NO
RESPONDENT PRESENT THIS MORNING. >> THIS ONE WAS ALSO POSTED BACK
SO SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, AGAIN WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU FIND THE VIOLATIONS NOTED DID EXIST BUT THAT THEY HAVE BEEN CURED AND THAT THE RESPONDENT BE WARNED THAT A FUTURE VIOLATION COULD SUBJECT THEM TO HIGHER FINES IN THE FUTURE.
>> OK. I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS BUT HAS BEEN CURED, AND THE RESPONDENT IS PUT ON NOTICE THAT FUTURE VIOLATIONS WILL INCUR FURTHER FINES.
>> OK. SO THE NEXT ONES ARE ALL GOING TO BE TELEPHONE. LET ME GET OVER HERE WITH MY TRUSTY TELEPHONE.
>> GOOD MORNING, MR. RANDALL. >> SPEAKING.
>> HI. THIS IS JANEY CALLING FROM THE
>> GOOD MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING.
>> WE ARE HERE IN FRONT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AND WE ARE
>> THANKS. >> OK, UM, MR. RANDOLPH, WILL
[B. 20-1349 CE 1604 N 18th Street TELEPHONE Randolph, Tommie Randolph Sr, Curtis Heather Debevec]
YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD?>> CURTIS RANDOLPH. >> DO YOU SWIRE OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
THIS IS GOING TO BE CASE NUMBER 201349, 1604 NORTH 18TH
>> AND MY NAME SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IS HEATHER, 201349, 1604 NORTH 18TH STREET OWNED BY TOMMY RANDOLPH AND CURTIS RANDOLPH SENIOR. IT WAS INITIATED ON JUNE 12 OF
[00:10:02]
LAST YEAR, 2028 SUBSECTION C RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTAINERS.IT WAS REQUESTED THAT THEY STORE TRASH YARD AND RECYCLE BINS TO THE SIDE OR THE REAR OF THE HOME.
THE CITY'S REQUESTING THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXIST THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 10 DAY COMPLY OR A FINE
AND I DO HAVE PHOTOS TO SUBMIT. >> OH, OK.
BECAUSE I KNOW IT'S MORE THAN ONE CONTAINER THERE AND SOMETIMES THEY PARK THE ONE ACROSS THE STREET THERE.
BUT WE HAVE BEEN MOVING THE THING BACK AND PUTTING IT IN THE
BACKYARD. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IF I MIGHT INTERRUPT FOR JUST ONE SECOND SINCE WE HAVE BEEN HANDED SOME PHOTOS AND CAN I JUST INQUIRE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THEY WERE PREVIOUSLY RESPONDED TO THE RESPONDENT PRIOR TO THIS
HEARING? >> THEY WERE E-MAILED THIS MORNING WITH AN E-MAIL PROVIDED BY COLLEEN.
>> OK. COUNSEL OR, MR. RANDOLPH, HAVE
YOU SEEN THAT E-MAIL? >> NO, I DID NOT SEE THE E-MAIL.
LET ME -- >> DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO
THE PHOTOS COMING INTO EVIDENCE? >> LET ME SEE.
THERE'S SOME NEW MAIL THAT CAME THIS MORNING.
INCOME FROM THE CITY? >> THE E-MAIL CAME FROM MYSELF, SIR, YES. AND IT WAS A CITY E-MAIL.
>> LET'S SEE E-MAIL -- OK. PROBABLY NOT A BIG OBJECTION, I KNOW WE DO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE PEOPLE PUTTING THEIRS ACROSS THE STREET. BUT -- OH, YEAH.
IS THAT THE ONE YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, THOSE TWO?
>> SO, I AM ASSUMING ALL OF THESE PHOTOS THAT ARE IN THE CITY'S EXHIBIT FOR IDENTIFICATION, THEY HAVE BEEN PROVIDED VIA E-MAIL IN THAT ONE E-MAIL?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> YEAH, I SEE THEM.
>> DID YOU TAKE THE PHOTOS? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> DID I TAKE THE PHOTOS? >> NO, SIR.
I'M REFERRING TO MISS DUBEVIK. DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY
DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? >> WHAT I SEE THIS MORNING, YES.
>> SO AT THIS TIME I WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOS IN AS CITY'S 1
I AM LOOKING TO TRY TO SEE THE DATE ON THOSE.
>> OK. WERE THESE ALL TAKEN IN THE
SAME, ON DIFFERENT DATES? >> SOME WERE FROM THE ORIGINAL WHEN I ORIGINALLY OPENED THE CASE AND SOME WERE FROM DECEMBER
31. >> I SEE SOME 12/31, IS THAT 2019? NO THAT'S NOT 2019.
>> THE DATE IS ON EACH OF THE PHOTOS.
>> WE HAVE ALREADY CONTINUED IT -- UM --
>> MR. RANDOLPH, DO YOU SEE THAT?
>> OK. >> AND, IS IT ABOUT THE GARBAGE CANS OR, I SEE SOME TRASH ON THE GROUND ALSO.
>> THIS CASE WAS ABOUT THE CONTAINERS.
>> THE PHOTOS SUBMITTED WILL BE ADMITTED AS THE CITY'S COMPOSITE
>> AND IS THERE -- DO YOU WANT TO SAY ANYTHING ELSE, SIR?
HAVE THEY BEEN MOVED SINCE THEN? >> YES, THEY HAVE BEEN -- WHAT HAPPENED, THEY WERE MOVED, NOBODY'S LIVING IN THE HOUSE.
WHEN WE COME BACK BY THERE, WE SEE THE CONTAINERS, PULL ALL THE WAY TO THE FRONT, WE WILL PULL THEM ALL THE WAY TO THE BACK.
EITHER THEY USE THEM ACROSS THE STREET, THE GUYS DOWN, MAYBE ABOUT TWO OR THREE HOUSES, I GUESS THEY BE DRINKING BEER AND ALL KIND OF STUFF, THEY WILL COME AND GET THE GARBAGE CANS, PULL 'EM BACK DOWN, WE LOOK AND SEE THEM, WE PULL THEM ALL THE WAY BACK IN THE BACKYARD. WE ARE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE TO TIE THEM DOWN OR SOMETHING UNTIL SOMEBODY GETS IN THE HOUSE.
BECAUSE NOBODY'S LIVING IN THE HOUSE.
>> NOBODY MAY BE LIVING THERE BUT THERE HAVE BEEN VEHICLES
THERE AS YOU CAN -- >> YEAH, THERE'S A VEHICLE THERE. ONE OF THE TENANTS STAYING IN BACK OF THE OTHER SIDE OF THE HOUSE PULLED HIS VEHICLE THERE.
THEN THERE WAS A TRUCK THAT RECENTLY WAS PULLED THERE.
BUT BOTH OF THEM, THE TRUCK HAS A TAG ON IT.
BUT AS FAR AS THE GARBAGE CAN, THAT'S THE PROBLEM WE HAVE BEEN HAVING WITH IT. WE WENT DOWN THERE, I HAD A BRIEF ARGUMENT WITH THEM. THE ONLY OTHER THING I NEED TO DO IS PROBABLY PULL THEM BACK DOWN, CALL YOU ALL OR CALL THE
POLICE. >> MR. RANDOLPH, YOU HAVE -- I'M
[00:15:05]
GOING GOING TO FIND THAT IF THEE OUT THERE, YOU HAVE 10 DAYS TO COMPLY. WHATEVER YOU NEED TO DO TO MAKE SURE THEY AREN'T THERE, YOU HAVE 10 DAYS TO DO THAT BEFORE -- I DIDN'T I DIDN'T HEAR THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINE BUTIF IT IS NOT COMPLIED WITH, WITHIN 10 DAYS, THE FINE OF $10
A DAY WOULD START AT THAT POINT. >> OK THEN.
>> OK? >> WE WILL MOVE THEM AGAIN.
I HOPE WE DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM AGAIN WITH THEM.
BECAUSE WE JUST HAVE TO CALL THE POLICE ON IT.
>> SO HE HAS ONE MORE CASE I BELIEVE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IS
THAT CORRECT? >> YES, I SEE THAT.
YEAH. >> I DIDN'T WANT HIM TO HANG UP.
>> DID HE HANG UP? >> MR. RANDOLPH?
>> DO YOU WANT TO CALL HIM BACK? >> PLEASE.
>> OK. I THINK THAT'S WHY HE ASKED --
>> MR. RANDOLPH, GOOD MORNING AGAIN.
THIS IS JANEY, CITY OF FORT PIERCE.
>> DID I HANG UP TOO FAST? >> YES, SIR.
WE STILL HAVE ONE MORE CASE TO GO THROUGH.
>> OK. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 201348,
[C. 20-1348 CE 1604 N 18th Street TELEPHONE Randolph, Tommie Randolph Sr, Curtis Heather Debevec]
1604 NORTH 18TH STREET RANDOLPH.>> MM-HMM. >> GOOD MORNING AGAIN SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. 1604 NORTH 18TH STREET, TOMMY RANDOLPH AND CURTIS RANDOLPH SENIOR.
THIS CASE WAS INITIATED ON JUNE 12 OF LAST YEAR FOR IPM C, PROTECTIVE TREATMENT, REQUESTING THAT THEY PAINT THE NORTHSIDE OF THE HOME WHERE THE PAINT IS PEELING.
THE CITY RECOMMENDS IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE EXISTS HE BE GIVEN TIME OR A FINE OF $50 PER DAY AND I DO HAVE PHOTOS TO
SUBMIT. >> I'M SORRY, TO INTERRUPT MR. RANDOLPH -- NOTING NO OBJECTION, WE WOULD ASK TO MOVE THE PHOTOS IN AS CITY'S 1 COMPOSITE.
>> DID HE JUST SAY HE SAW THEM? >> I BELIEVE HE INDICATED HE HAD NO OBJECTION. IS THAT CORRECT, MR. RANDOLPH?
>> THAT'S CORRECT, NO OBJECTION TO THE PHOTOS.
AND -- WE ARE GOING TO GET THAT TAKEN CARE OF THAT SIDE -- WAS IT JUST THE PAINTING OF THAT SIDE OF THE HOUSE?
>> THAT'S WHAT I HAD NOTICED, YES, SIR.
I AM -- THE PHOTOS SUBMITTED, WITHOUT OBJECTION, WILL BE ADMITTED AS THE CITY'S COMPOSITE 1.
>> AND WAS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANTED TO ADD?
>> NO. YOU SAID I HAD 30 DAYS TO GO
AHEAD AND GET IT PAINTED? >> THAT'S RIGHT.
I AM GOING TO ORDER THAT YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO HAVE IT PAINTED AND THEN IF NOT, A FINE OF $50 A DAY WILL AC ACCRUE FROM THAT PO.
[H. 20-1309 CE 1610 N 18th Street McNeil, Nancy (TELEPHONE) Heather Debevec]
>> AND WE HAVE ANOTHER CASE THAT'S GOING TO BE TELEPHONE.
CASE 201309, 1610 NORTH 18TH STREET, MCNEIL.
[00:20:07]
RINGING]>> GOOD MORNING, MISS MCNEIL? >> YES.
>> HI. THIS IS JANEY CALLING FROM THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. THE WE ARE FROM THE SPECIAL
>> WE ARE GOING TO PROCEED. >> OK.
>> MA'AM, WOULD YOU PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT-HAND AND STATE YOUR
NAME FOR THE RECORD? >> NANCY --
>> AND DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO
GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> THANK YOU. >> GOOD MORNING, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. IT'S HEATHER -- CASE NUMBER 201309 FOR 1610 NORTH 18TH STREET OWNED BY NANCY MCNEIL, INITIATED JUNE 12 OF LAST YEAR FOR SECTION 24-19, 24-20, 24 -- 21 SUBSECTION 1 SUBSECTION 5 FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE.
IT WAS REQUESTED THAT THEY REMOVE THE TARPS FROM THE SHED.
THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXIST, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN TIME TO COMPLY OR A FINE.
I HAVE SOME PHOTOS, AND SOME PHOTOS WERE DROPPED OFF TO MISS MCNEIL I BELIEVE YESTERDAY. YOU WILL NOTICE IN THE PHOTOS THAT THE TARPS WERE REMOVED BUT THERE'S -- AND I APOLOGIZE IF IT'S HARD TO SEE DUE TO SOME SHADOWING, THAT THEY HAD PUT UP A SCREENING LIKE WHAT YOU WOULD PUT ON A FENCE.
DISCUSSING IT WITH MY SUPERVISOR, IT'S STILL NOT IN
COMPLIANCE WITH -- >> SO THE PHOTOS, DID YOU TAKE
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> SO AT THIS TIME WE WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOS IN AS CITY'S 1 COMPOSITE.
>> DID YOU SAY YOU WANT THE SHED REMOVED?
>> NO, MA'AM. >> THAT'S NOT WHAT YOU SAID.
THE PHOTOS YET. >> MISS MCNEIL?
>> YES. >> DID YOU RECEIVE THE PHOTOS THAT WERE DROPPED OFF TO YOUR HOUSE YESTERDAY?
>> OK, I AM ADMITTING THE PHOTOS SUBMITTED AS THE CITY'S EXHIBIT 1. YOU HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THEM BEING INTRODUCED. CORRECT?
THANK YOU. >> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE PHOTOS OR ANY OTHER GUIDANCE OR REQUEST
THAT -- OF MISS MCNEIL? >> -- ABOUT THE PHOTOS -- AFTER SHE TOOK THEM, MY HUSBAND, CLEANED UP THE YARD.
ALL THE STUFF GONE. BUT THE SHED'S STILL THERE.
BUT THE COMPLAINT WAS ABOUT INSIDE FURNITURE ON THE OUTSIDE.
HE GOT RID OF ALL OF IT. >> SO SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IF STAFF CAN BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> AS I'VE STATED, WHAT'S BEFORE YOU RIGHT AT THE MOMENT IS ABOUT REMOVING THE TARPS FROM THE SHED. THE TARPS HAD BEEN REMOVED, THEY REPLACED IT WITH A SCREENING LIKE WHAT YOU WOULD HANG ON A FENCE AT A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO KEEP PEOPLE FROM VIEWING IN.
AFTER DISCUSSING THAT WITH MY SUPERVISOR, THAT WOULD STILL NOT
BE IN COMPLIANCE. >> OH, THE FEBRUARY?
>> WOULD YOU CONSIDER THAT A NEW VIOLATION OR CONTINUATION OF
THIS ONE? >> IT WOULD STILL BE A CONTINUATION OF THIS ONE. THE.
>> A CONTINUATION. JUST THEY REMOVED THE TARP AND
REPLACED IT WITH A SCREEN. >> MA'AM, DID YOU -- ARE YOU
TALKING TO ME? >> NOT -- SHE'S SAYING THAT YOU REMOVED THE TARP, BUT THERE'S A SCREEN THERE, WHICH IS ALSO NOT
IN COMPLIANCE. >> OH, TAKE THE SCREEN DOWN.
>> OK, MA'AM, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT THE VIOLATION STILL EXISTS BUT YOU HAVE 10 DAYS TO COMPLY. OK?
>> OK SO -- WHAT YOU WANT ME TO TAKE THAT SCREEN DOWN.
[00:25:01]
>> AND WHAT ELSE? >> THAT'S IT.
>> OK. YOU HAVE 10 DAYS TO DO THAT OR THE FINE OF $50 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED AFTER THE 10 DAYS.
>> OK I'LL HAVE HIM TAKE THE SCREEN DOWN TODAY, MA'AM.
>> OK, THANK YOU. A SCREEN -- THEY SAID SCREEN --
>> THAT ENDED THE CALL? >> WAS THAT OUR LAST CASE?
>> THAT'S IT. >> SO, IF WE COULD JUST PUT ON THE RECORD HOW THE PEOPLE WHO FAILED TO APPEAR TODAY WERE
ACTUALLY NOTIC NOTICED. >> CASES REQUIRED A HEARING PER STATE STATUTE 162-12, A NOTICE WAS SENT CERTIFIED MAIL.
IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED SIGNED IT IS PLACED IN THE FILE.
IF IT'S RETURNED UNSIGNED OR UNCLAIMED, AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING WITH A NOTICE OF HEARING ENCLOSED IS SENT TO THE VIOLATOR REGULAR U.S. MAIL. 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD AT CITY HALL.
A NOTICE OF HEARING IS ALSO POSTED AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.
IF THE GREEN CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING, THE POSTING IS COMPLETED IN THE SAME MANNER AS IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED. FOR CASES NOT -- FOR CASES NOT MANDATED BY STATE STATUTE, MAILING OF THE NOTICE OF HEARING ARE HANDLED IN THE SAME MANNER STATED PRIOR.
IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED, UNCLAIMED, OR NOT RETURNED WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE HEARING, A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD IN CITY HALL.
♪
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.