[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
[B. IDENTIFICATION OF CASES IN COMPLIANCE OR RESCHEDULED]
[G. 21-962 CE 512 N 15TH ST Kevin A Jackson & Linda D Wilson Chad Dawson]
[00:04:51]
>> $100 A DAY WOULD BE ASSESSED.
I DO HAVE COMPOSITE ONE BUT I DON'T BELIEVE HE SAW THEM.
[00:05:01]
>> THESE ARE JUST PHOTOS, OKAY. THERE'S MORE THAN I SAW THERE.
AND DESCRIBE, OKAY? THE CUTOFFS, DID YOU TAKE PHOTOGRAPH? ES.
>> YES, MA'AM. >> DO THEY FAIRLY DEPICT WHAT
>> THIS IS ONE COMPOSITE. >> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE PHOTOGRAPHS ON
THE SCREEN OFFICER U DAWSON? >> NO MA'AM.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER, MS. DAWSON?
>> NO MA'AM. >> AND SIR, STATE YOUR NAME.
>> KEVIN JACKSON. >> AND HOW YOU RESPOND TO THE
ALLEGATIONS? >> YES, I WAS OUT OF TOWN AND WHEN I FIRST GOT THE CALL FROM THE CODE ENFORCEMENT AND I THOUGHT THAT EVERYTHING WAS UNDER COMPLIANT BUT I GOT BACK LAST NIGHT AND I LOOKED AT IT AND I SAW THE TENT WAS DOWN AND I SAW TWO TABLES. I WENT BACK DOWN.
AND LOOKING AT THE PLY WOOD THAT I HAVE FOR THEM.
DO THE RIGHT THING. THE GUY THEY KNEW, HE WORKS ON AND HE'S THERE. AND MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING IS RIGHT. IT'S BY A SITUATION THAT REMOVE THE TABLES. WE MOVED THE TENTS.
WE MOVED THE PATTERNS AND EVERYTHING AND THEN WE COME BACK IN THE MORNING. WE WILL PULL THEM UP BUT YOU KNEW THAT. SO MY CONVERSATION WITH HIM WAS GATE TRAIL. PRETEND YOU'RE AT YOU UNDERSTAND BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO PUT NO PRIVACY FENCE UP THERE. I WANT TO HAVE ACCESS OPEN IN CASE THING HAPPEN. WATCH OR WHATEVER IT TAKE TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY. SO, WHAT I'M ASKING YOU I CAN MEET OUT THERE OR WHATEVER. HOWEVER YOU WANT TO DO IT AND LET ME GET THIS OUT OF CONTROL. AND TO PUT BACK UP.
BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT WAS A GOOD DEED FOR THE COMMUNITY.
NOBODY CAN BE OUT THERE. NOTHING.
I LIKE TO GET IT STRAIGHTENED OUT AND CONTINUE TO HAVE IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEM HAVE BECOME -- YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO DO ANY --
>> I I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THAT.
A CALL CAME IN FROM 911. THAT'S HOW WE WE WERE FIRST DISPATCHER OUT THERE. HE USES IT FOR ANYTHING INCLUDING PUTTING A PORTA POTTY ON OR USING IT FOR ANYTHING.
I SUGGEST HE MEETS WITH OUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT BECAUSE A VACANT LOT ACTUALLY HAS NO USES OTHER THAN TO REMAIN VACANT.
[00:10:03]
WE ARE ASKING THAT EVERYTHING THAT'S ON THE LOT BE REMOVED INCLUDING THE PORTA POTTY AND EVERYTHING.THERE'S NO USES ON THIS LOT AT THIS TIME.
UNLESS WE MAY GET ONE. THERE MAY BE A TEMPORARY ONE HE CAN SUBMIT FOR. THE BEST WAY TO IDENTIFY WHAT HE CAN BE DOING LEGALLY IS TO MEET WITH HIS PLANNING DEPARTMENT. WE ARE ASKING EVERYTHING TO BE REMOVED UNTIL HE FINDS A LEGAL PATH TO FOLLOW.
>> YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, MR. JACKSON?
>> FOLLOW. >> THIS IS A VACANT LOT THAT
NOW, ON THE OTHER SIDE IT BELONGS TO SOMEBODY ELSE.
>> AND WE WILL NOT DEAL WITH THE OTHER SIDE.
YOU'VE SPOKEN WITH MR. DAWSON SO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU NEED TO DO
TO CORRECT THIS. >> YES, MA'AM.
AND YOU HEARD SAY GET WITH PLANNING SO THEY CAN TELL YOU
IS IT A HANG OUT SPOT PEOPLE JUST COME AND SIT AND PLAY
CARDS OR WHATEVER JUST CHAT. >> YES, MA'AM.
>> YES, MA'AM. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO MA'AM. >> BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXIST AT 5:12 AND THAT KEVIN JACKSON ARE THE PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I WILL GIVE YOU TEN DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED.
YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. SO, YOU'VE SPOKEN WITH MR. DAWSON SO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU NEED TO DO.
>> I NEED GO BY AND IF I HAVE ANY PROBLEM I WILL CALL.
AND I WILL GO OVER THIS PROPERTY.
>> YES. >> AND WE'LL GO FROM THERE.
>> THANK YOU FOR COMING. GOOD LUCK.
>> THANK YOU. >> THE DEPARTMENT THAT GOES TO
THE SIDE, THE DESK. >> I CAN SHOW THEM.
WE WILL GO OUT OF ORDERER WHILE CHAD WAS TESTIFYING A COUPLE OF HIS CASES CAME IN. I WILL ORDER SO YOU HAVE A CHANCE TO TALK TO SOME OF YOUR CASES. I'M SORRY.
WE WILL JUMP DOWN TO CASE 20- 2640, 107 SOUTH 18TH
[I. 20-2640 CE 107 S 18th St Jean R Dantilus Isaac Saucedo]
>> GOOD MORNING. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 20-2640, 107 SOUTH 18TH STREET. THE CASE WAS INITIALUATED ON NOVEMBER 16TH OF 2020 BY MYSELF AND THE OWNER IS 555 NORTHWEST TWILIGHT TERRENCE IN FORT ST. LUCIE.
SUBSECTION ONE AND FIVE FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE AND SECTION 24192021 SUBSECTION 4 FOR PARKING OTHER THAN PAVEMENT.
THE CITY REQUEST THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATION EXIST. GIVEN FIVE DAYS TO COMPLY OR $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED. I DID GO OUT THIS WEEKEND.
THE PROPERTY CONTINUES TO LOOK THE SAME.
SOME OF THE OUTSIDE STORAGE ON THE SIDE OF THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN TAKEN CARE OF HOWEVER TOWARDS THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY THERE'S A PILE OF DEBRIS LAYING TOWARDS THE BACK.
>> DO THESE PHOTOS GET UPLOADED >> ALL RIGHT.
>> I KNOW YOU HAD COMPUTER ISSUES YESTERDAY.
>> I'M NOT SURE IF YOU WANT TO LOOK AT THE PHOTOS.
THE ONES I TOOK ON SUNDAY. >> IS THAT IT?
>> YEAH. >> DID YOU TAKE THE PHOTOS?
>> I DID. >> DID THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT
>> THANK YOU. >> SO THIS TIME WE MOVE THE
[00:15:17]
PHOTOS IN AS CITY'S COMPOSITE ONE.>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> THANK YOU. >> YOU'RE WELCOME.
>> THE STRAOE TREE IS ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS.
>> I DIDN'T GET A CHANCE. >> NICE TREE.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, NOT FOR ME.
>> OKAY AND HOW DO YOU RESPOND? >> GOOD MORNING.
>> GOOD MORNING. >> YEAH, I AM ON 107 SOUTH 18TH STREET BUT WHEN I HAVE THIS PROPERTY I BEGAN TO HAVE IT DOWN. THERE'S A PILE OF DEBRIS, WALK AND WHATEVER AND ONE ON THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY AND ONE ON THE OTHER SIDE. I REMEMBER I SPOKE AND I EXPLAIN HIM THAT MY PROPERTY GOT SOME EASEMENT ON IT.
I GOT IT ON THE BACK AND GOT IT ON MY NORTH SIDE AND MY SOUTH SIDE THERE'S A SMALL PROPERTY BECAUSE I GOT A PATIO, MY PROPERTY IS EXACTLY TO THE FIELD.
AND THE PART OF BLOCKS AND BRICKS ALMOST IS ON THE OTHER SMALL PROPERTY IS 0.08 ACRES WHICH IS NOT MINE.
AND ALSO IN THE BACK WITH THE'SMENT -- EASEMENT IS THIS IS THE WAY OF THE THINGS ARE LOCATED.
BUT SINCE THEY ASKED ME TO MOVE THEM AND I FOUND THEM THERE I DON'T KNOW AND I'M NOT RESPONSIBLE TO MOVE ALL THOSE THINGS. THIS IS THE REASON THEY ARE STILL THERE. I DON'T KNOW HOW IT WILL HURT ME TO GET THIS IF THEY ARE TO MOVE TO BE MOVED BUT I DON'T THINK I GOT THE RESPONSIBILITY TO MOVE THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE
NOT IN MY PROPERTY. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WE WILL
PULL IT UP NOW. >> YES, THANK YOU.
ALL THE BRICKS THAT ARE BACK IN HERE IN THIS PHOTOGRAPH.
THOSE ARE NOT YOURS? >> BECAUSE THERE'S AN EASEMENT
IN THE BACK. >> IT'S AN EASEMENT NOT ON YOUR
PROPERTY? >> IT'S MY PROPERTY BUT THERE'S AN EASEMENT IN THE BACK. THIS IS WHERE THE BLOCK IS LOCATED AND I HAVE A SMALL PROPERTY HERE.
IT'S 0.08-ACRES BELONGING TO SOMEONE ELSE.
>> HOW DID THE BRICKS GET THERE?
>> I DON'T KNOW. I SAW THEM THERE.
THE ONLY THING I HAVE IS THERE WAS NO ONE LIVING IN THE HOUSE WHEN THEY BECOME BUT SOMEONE CALLED ME.
THERE WAS SOME PEOPLE COME BECAUSE THEY THERE AND THEN AFTER SOME PEOPLE COME. IT'S LIKE SOME -- I CAN SAY NOTHING BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY ARE THERE BECAUSE I DON'T NEED THEM. THERE IS NO REASON.
I CAN LEAVE THEM THERE. >> SO WHO OWNS THE BRICKS?
>> I DON'T KNOW. >> ISAAC? SORRY, LOOKING AT THIS PHOTO HERE, WHERE ARE THE BRICKS
LOCATED? >> THE BRICKS WILL BE LOCATED
SOMEWHERE AROUND HERE. >> USE THE MOUSE.
>> MAYBE ALMOST TOWARDS THE PROPERTY LINE AROUND THIS SECTION WHERE YOU SEE THESE TREES RIGHT HERE.
[00:20:01]
I'M NOT SURE IF MAYBE THEY ARE PROBABLY HAVE A BETTER OR WOULD BE ABLE TO ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT MORE.>> GIVE ME A TAP. >> WHILE THEY ARE DOING THAT --LY POINT OUT THAT AN EASEMENT IS GENERALLY A RIGHT TO USE PROPERTY USUALLY AS A PASS THROUGH FROM ONE LOCATION TO THE NEXT. IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT IT'S NOT ON THE PARCEL THAT'S OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT IN THIS CASE. I WILL STEP BACK AND SEE WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE ABLE TO ESTABLISHISH THAT THE NUISANCE ITEMS ARE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL THAT'S OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT PER PROPERTY APPRAISER.
IT'S THE BEST I CAN GET. THAT'S THE RIGHT PLACE.
>> AROUND THAT SECTION WHERE YOU HAVE SOMEWHERE AROUND
>> SO I AM SEEING THERE'S AN ALLEY WAY BUT IF THERE'S AN EASEMENT THAT GOES ALONG WITH THAT ALLEY WAY, IT'S TURNING IT ON. IF THERE'S AN EASEMENT HERE THAT DOESN'T IT'S STILL A PROPERTY OWNERS RESPONSIBILITY.
I DO SEE THERE'S AN ALLEY WAY BACK HERE.
>> HOW LONG HAVE THE BRICKS BEEN BACK THERE?
>> I DON'T RECALL. HOW LONG HAVE YOU OWNED THE
PROPERTY? >> 2014 SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
>> WERE THE BRICKS THERE WHEN YOU BOUGHT THE PROPERTY?
>> IT WAS NOT THERE. IT WAS NOT.
>> ARE THEY IN GOOD CONDITION? >> YEAH, THEY ARE THERE.
SOME OF THEM. IT'S LIKE THEY TOOK THEM FROM I DON'T KNOW SOME ALLEY AND THEN THEY PUT THEM BECAUSE I REMEMBER THEY CALLED ME AND SOME GUY COME IN WITH A TRUCK TO TAKE THE TIME I COME TO SEE WHERE IT WAS AND THEY ALREADY GONE. BUT I DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING
ABOUT IT. >> ABOUT HOW MANY BRICKS ARE
BACK THERE? >>> HONESTLY, I'M NOT SURE.
IT'S A PRETTY BIG PILE. I REALLY COULDN'T SAY HOW MANY THERE IS BUT THERE'S A QUITE FEW.
>> THOSE BRICKS ARE EXPENSIVE. >> THEY ARE.
>> I'M JUST THINKING -- >> CAN I MAKE A RECOMMENDATION?
>> YES. >> BECAUSE THERE IS A CITY PROPERTY BEHIND THIS PROPERTY WHICH IS AN ALLEY WAY, I WILL RECOMMEND CONTINUING THIS JUST FOR THE TWO WEEKS TO THE NEXT MEETING ON THE 21ST TO ALLOW ISAAC TO MEET OUT THERE.
WE CAN MAKE A MEASURING WHEEL EASY AND MEASURE THIS PROPERTY OUT. IT'S 148 FEET BACK AND IDENTIFY WHOSE PROPERTY BECAUSE IF THE BRICKS GOT DUMPED ON THE CITY PROPERTY THEN WE CAN NOTIFY PUBLIC WORKS AND HAVE THAT ADDRESSED BUT THEN WE WILL ASK HIM THAT HE'S RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS PROPERTY. I'D LIKE TO CONTINUE THIS UNTIL THE 21ST TO ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN.
>> YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? >> YES.
>> I'LL TELL YOU SOMETHING ELSE, TOO.
I HAVE A SON THAT'S PRETTY CREATIVE WITH YARD WORK AND HE TOOK SOME BRICKS AND JUST BROKEN BRICKS AND STONE AND JUST MADE A BEAUTIFUL WALKWAY AT HIS HOUSE.
[00:25:26]
THAT'S A BEAUTIFUL TREE. >> THAT SOMEONE COME BECAUSE I WAS WAITING FOR A GUY AND I GOT EVERYTHING CLEANED.
>> OKAY. WE'LL CONTINUE IT FOR GO WEEKS
AND SEE WHAT CAN BE WORKED OUT. >> OKAY.
HAVE AND GOOD ONE. >> OUR NEXT CASE WILL BE 20-
[A. 20-2711 CE 601 N 18TH Street All Around Town LLC Chad Dawson]
2711. 601 NORTH 18TH STREET ALLAROUND TOWN, LLC. >>ER RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
YOU SWEAR THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE
>> THANK YOU. >> MR. DAWSON WHEN YOU'RE READY
>> IN IS CASE 20-2711, 601 NORTH 18TH STREET OWNED BY ALL AROUND TOWN LLC. THE CASE WAS INITIATED DECEMBER 9TH OF 2020. THE PROPER SITE 304.13 WINDOWS SKYLIGHT AND DOOR FRAMES. CITY REQUESTED A SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATIONS THAT THEY BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
I HAVE PHOTOS TO SUBMIT AND VIEW.
[00:30:25]
>>> THEY LOOK LIKE YOU HAVE A LOT TO DO BUT STILL THERE'S SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.
>> THANK YOU. >> OUR NEXT SKIES 20-2708.
[C. 20-2708 CE 921 Avenue D Jacquelin Pierre & Bernard Cherisol Chad Dawson]
921 AVENUE D. JACQUELINE PIERRE AND BERNARD.I WILL SWEAR YOU IN. PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
>> YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE
>> THIS IS CASE 20-2708, 921 AVENUE D OWNED BY JACQUELINE PIERRE. POTENTIAL TREATMENT.
CITY REQUEST THAT A SPECIAL MAGISTRATE EXIST THAT THEY GIVEN TEN DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $50 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. DO I HAVE SOME PHOTOS TO SUBMIT. I WOULD LIKE FOR MR. BERNARD TO
SEE THEM AS WELL. >> THEY WOULD BE ADMITTED AS
SUCH. >> MR. BERNARD DID REACH OUT TO ME ONCE HE GOT THE NOTICES FOR COURT.
WE DID FIND OUT THAT HIS ADDRESS THAT HE HAS IS INCORRECT AND HE HAS TO CORRECT IT DID WANT TO PUT ON RECORD THAT HE DID REACH OUT ONCE HE GOT THE NOTICES OF THE
VIOLATION ON THE PROPERTY. >> OKAY.
THANK YOU FOR THAT. AND SIR, YOUR NAME?
>> BERNARD. >> HOW YOU RESPOND TO THE ALLEGATION? ES.
>> TY HAVE BEEN DEALING -- I HAVE BEEN DEALING WITH IT FOR YEARS. WHEN I SEE THE PICTURE HERE.
I AM DIEING TO GET IT. >> OKAY.
I THANK \TIN SPECIAL OR THE FOR HELPING ME UNDERSTAND THE VIOLATION. SO I'LL DO IT RIGHT NOW SEE IF I CAN -- IF THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE RESPECTFULLY THE COMMITMENT THERE. IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT I NEED TO DO BECAUSE I'M IN FORT LAUDERDALE SITES KIND OF FAR WAY. I CHANGE THE ADDRESS.
I WILL GO OVER THERE TO MAKE SURE IT CHANGE.
>> OKAY. YOU PROBABLY DO IT ONLINE, TOO.
>> YEAH. I'M 70 YEARS OLD YOUR YOUR
SO YOU'RE GOING TO GO AND PAINT A PRESSURE WASHER.
YOU CAN DO THAT WITHIN TEN DAYS?
>> YEAH. I CAN GET IT DONE TODAY.
IF YOU GIVE ME MORE TIME IN CASE IT RAIN BECAUSE I HAVE TO
DRIVE FROM FORT LAUDERDALE. >> IT'S A LITTLE CLOUDY OUT
THERE. >> I WAS GOING TO SAY I KNOW IT'S PRETTY HEAVY RAINY SEASON NOW SO PERHAPS A LITTLE MORE TIME MIGHT BE NECESSARY DUE TO THE CURRENT WEATHER CONDITIONS.
>> VERY SUFFICIENT FOR BOTH PARTIES.
>> THANK YOU YOUR HONOR. >> THANK YOU.
>> BASED ON THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENT PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXIST AT 921 AVENUE D AND THAT JACQUELINE PIERRE AND
[00:35:01]
BERNARD ARE THE RESPONSIBLE PARTIES FOR THE VIOLATION.I WILL GIVE YOU 30 DAYS TO COMPLY.
IF NOT YOU WILL BE FINED $50 PER DAY.
YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. GOOD LUCK.
THIS IS HARD GETTING PEOPLE TO DO STUFF NOWADAYS WITH THE WEATHER SO MUCH THAN NEEDS TO BE DONE.
>> YES, IT IS. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 21-497.
[D. 21-497 CE 535 S 7TH ST Ermith Lazare Isaac Saucedo]
525 SOUTH 7TH STREET. >> IT'S CASE NUMBER 21-497.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON MARCH 7TH, 2021 BY MYSELF.
THE OWNER'S PERMIT OF 3406 IN FORT PIERCE.
THE VIOLATIONS PER STAIRWAYS, DECK, PORCHES AND BALCONIES THROUGH 4.13, WINDOWS, SKYLIGHTS AND DOOR FRAMES.
4.2 FOR PROTECTIVE TREATMENT. DO WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT 4.13 FOR WINDOW, SKYLIGHTS AND DOOR FRAMES HAS BEEN FIXED, THE BROKEN WINDOWS. HOWEVER THIS IS A HISTORIC PROPERTY SO I DON'T KNOW IF WHEN A HISTORIC PROPERTY IF YOU JUST REPLACE THE GLASS ON A WINDOW --
>> WHEN YOU REPLACE A PANE, IT'S OKAY.
>> SO, I DO WANT TO ALSO CHANGE THE RECOMMENDATION BECAUSE THERE IS A LOT OF WORK THAT STILL NEEDS TO BE DONE.
I WANT TO RECEIVE IF WE CAN CHANGING THE TEN DAYS FOR 90 DAYS AND IF NOT COMPLIED BY THEN A FINE OF $150 BE ASSESSED PER DAY. I DO HAVE PHOTOS HERE.
>> DID YOU TAKE THE PHOTOS? >> I DID.
>> DO THEY FAIRLY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> I DID. >> I WILL JUST DO AN R AND D WITH REGARDS TO RPNC304.13 WINDOWS, WITH AN ASSESSMENT.
THIS IS IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT.
>> THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WITH REGARD YOU'RE FINDING THAT A VIOLATION DID EXIST BUT IT'S CURED BUT THAT THE RESPONDENT COULD BE COULD FACE ADDITIONAL PENALTIES THE AND VIOLATE THE SAME SUBSECTION AGAIN. YES, THANK YOU.
>> THE PHOTOS IN THE CITY'S ONE COMPOSITE.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED. >> YOU HAVE TO GET IT.
>> DID I SWEAR YOU IN THIS MORNING? I WILL SWEAR HER IN REALLY QUICK.
PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
>> YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE
WILL BE THE TRUTH. >> THANK YOU.
>> ALL RIGHT. HOW DO YOU RESPOND?
>> I AM WILLING TO DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GET THIS BUILDING THE WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE AND WE HAVE THE WINDOWS.
NOW WE WILL START SO THE 90 DAYS IS ENOUGH FOR ME.
>> OKAY. I KNOW YOU'VE DONE WELL WITH MOST OF THE BUILDINGS YOU'VE DONE.
>> YES. >> SO VERY MUCH MINDFUL OF THAT. ALL RIGHT THEN BASED ON TESTIMONY I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXIST AT 535 SOUTH 7TH STREET AND THAT SHE IS THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR THE VIOLATION. YOU'LL BE GIVEN 90 DAYS TO COMPLY. IF NOT $150 PER DAY WILL BE
[00:40:01]
ASSESSED. YOU'LL PROBABLY HAVE TO PULL A PERMIT WHICH I KNOW YOU'RE AWARE OF.>> I'M SUPPOSED TO AND I DID TRY BECAUSE WE WAS PLANNING TO REPLACE ALL THE WINDOWS BUT BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY WINDOWS AND THEY DON'T ALLOW US TO HAVE SOME OF THE WINDOWS WE HAVE TO PUT -- SO WE DECIDED TO JUST REPLACE THE GLASS.
ALL WE HAVE LEFT IS PAINTING AND SAND THE STAIRS AND PAINT.
SO I CALL THE PERMIT IF THIS IS NOT.
>> OKAY. ALL RIGHT AND YOU KNOW OF COURSE YOU GET THE PERMIT YOU'VE GOT 6 MONTHS TO GET IT DONE IF NOT YOU CAN GET WITH ISAAC OR THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT OR CODE AND GET AN EXTENSION.
SO, I DO FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT YOU ARE THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY AND YOU HAVE 90 DAYS TO COMPLY OR AS I SAID
A $150 FINE WILL BE ASSESSED. >> OUR NEXT CASE WILL BE 21-913
[A. 21-913 PK South Causeway Park Ashley Lauren Taylor Chad Dawson]
SOUTH CAUSE WAY PARK. ASHLEY LAUREN TAYLOR.>> IN IS A CITATION CASE AND THERE'S NO RESPONDENT PRESENT THIS MORNING. CAN I GO AHEAD AND QUESTION?
>> YES. >> WE KNOW WHEN YOU'RE READY.
>> WHICH CITATION IS THIS ONE? 21-913.
WERE YOU ASSIGNED TO THAT CASE OFFICER DAWSON?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WAS THAT ON APRIL 25TH
>> WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF FORT PIERCE?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WHAT WAS THE NATURE OF THE
VIOLATION YOU OBSERVED. >> PROPERTY WAS PARKED ON THE
CITY'S PLACE. >> DID YOU TAKE ANY PHOTOGRAPHS
THAT DAY? >> YES, MA'AM I DID.
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THIS IS IN CITY'S IN COMPOSITE AND NOTE NO RESPONDENT IS RESENT FOR THE
RECORD? >> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE PHOTO?
>> YOUR RECOMMENDATION IS THAT STILL YOUR RECOMMENDATION?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> OKAY. IT WILL BE ADMITTED YOUR
EXHIBIT COMPOSITE EXHIBIT. >> ASHLEY LAUREN TAYLOR IS NOT HERE. THERE IS NOT A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON HER BEHALF. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED . I FIND THE VIOLATION DOES EXIST AND SHE WILL BE FINED A TOTAL OF $78 PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. SHE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL AND FAILURE TO PAY THE CITATION FOR THE CITATION COULD RESULT IN THIS BEING TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT WHERE SHE COULD INCURRED ADDITIONAL FEES AND COST.
>> THANK YOU. >> YOU'RE WELCOME.
[B. 21-616 PK South Causeway Park Michelle Janette Spells Chad Dawson]
OUR NEXT CASE IS 21-616 SOUTH CAUSE WAY PARK, MICHELLE JANETSPELLS. >> OFFICER DAWSON WERE YOU SENT
TO THAT CASE AS WELL? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> WHEN WAS THAT CASE INITIATED?
>> THE CASE WAS INITIATED MARCH 14TH, 2021.
>> WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF FORT PIERCE?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WHAT WAS NATURE OF THE VIE
LAGS YOU OBSERVED. >> THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED IN FRONT OF A NO PARKING ANY TIME SIGN.
>> DID YOU TAKE PHOTOGRAPH? ES.
>> YES, MA'AM I DID. >> DO THEY FAIRLY AND
ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> AT THIS TIME WE MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS IN NOTING NO RESPONDENT PRESENT FOR THE RECORD.
>> VERY GOOD. IT THEREBY ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> THANK YOU. ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY ABOUT THE PHOTOGRAPHS OR ANYTHING ELSE ABOUT THIS CASE?
>> NO MA'AM. >> YOUR RECOMMENDATION IS STILL
THE SAME? >> THANK YOU NO FURTHER
QUESTIONS. >> AND FOR THE RECORD CITY ATTORNEY STATED IT'S STILL NOT PRESENT AND NEITHER IS THE REPRESENTATIVE. BASED ON THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION DOES EXIST AND SHE IS THE RESPONSIBLE PERSON. I WILL ORDER THAT SHE BE $78 FOR THIS APARTMENT VIOLATION. 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
>> OKAY. OUR NEXT CASE IS 21-617 SOUTH
[C. 21-617 PK South Causeway Park Rhonda Irene Lafferty Chad Dawson]
[00:45:04]
CAUSE WAY PARK. RHONDA IRENE.WERE YOU SAOEUPED TO CASE 21- -- WERE YOU ASSIGNED TO
CASE 21-617? >> KWREUPL YES, MA'AM I WAS.
>> THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED IN FRONT OF A NO PARKING ANY TIME
SIGN. >> DID YOU TAKE PICTURE?
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATE LY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> NO RESPONDENT HERE? >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED.
>> THING YOU WANT TO SAY? >> NO MA'AM AND MY RECOMMENDATION IS STILL THE SAME.
>> THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT THERE BEING NO ONE HERE ON BEHALF OF RHONDA IRENE AND SHE IS NOT PRESENT HERSELF BASED ON THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXIST AND SHE IS A RESPONSIBLE PARTY. I WILL FINE HER $78 AND A PROHIBITED PARKING LOT AND SHE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL FOR THE RECORD. IF SHE DOES NOT COMPLY.
THIS MAY BE TURNED OVER TO THE COUNTY CLERK WHERE SHE COULD INCURE ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS. NEXT CASE?
[D. 21-698 PK Jaycee Park David Christopher Farmer & Lisa Deanna Reid Chad Dawson]
>>> IT'S 21-619JC PARK. DAVID KRISTOPHER FARMER AND
LISA TK*EU -- DIANNA REED. >> OFFICER DAWSON WERE YOU
ASSIGNED TO THIS CASE? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> WAS THAT INITIATED ON MARCH 29TH OF THIS YEAR?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WAS IT IN FORT PIERCE?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THE VEHICLE WAS IN PARK AND THEY WERE BOTH IN THE PARKING SPOT.
>> WAS THERE A BOAT OR TRAILER ATTACHED TO THE VEHICLE?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> DID YOU TAKE PHOTOGRAPH?
ES. >> DID THEY FAIRLY AND RACKETLY
DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? >> YES, MA'AM.
WE HAVE THE FOE PHOTOGRAPHS IN THE CITY'S ONE COMPOSITE.
IT'S THE RED VEHICLE, CORRECT? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE.
>> BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT NEITHER DAVID KRISTOPHER FARMER OR LISA DIANNA REED IS PRESENT.
I WILL FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXIST AND THEY ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY PARTIES. I WILL BE ORDERED THAT THEY BE FINED A TOTAL OF $78 FOR THIS PARKING VIOLATION.
THEY HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. FAILURE TO APPEAL OR PAY THAT BILL MAY RESULT IN THE CASE TRANSFERRED TO THE COUNTY COURT WHERE THEY COULD INCURRED ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
[E. 21-700 PK South Causeway Park Josefina Castillo Castro Chad Dawson]
NEXT CASE IS SOUTH CAUSE WAY MARK.JOSEFINA CASTRO. >> THANK YOU.
WERE YOU SENT TO CASE 21-700? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> WAS THAT ON MARCH 28 OF THIS YEAR?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WITHIN THE CITY POLICE POLIC?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED IN FRONT OF A NO PARKING ANY TIME SIGN.
>> DID YOU TAKE PHOTOGRAPH? ES.
>> YES, MA'AM. >> DID THEY FAIRLY AND
ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? >>> NOTICE THAT WE WOULD HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS IN THE CITY'S COME COMPOSITE.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED ATDZ AS SUCH.
>> ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO SAY?
FOR THE RECORD ADMITTED IN EVIDENCE.
THERE IS NO ONE HERE ON BEHALF OF JOSEPHINA CASTRO.
I WILL FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS.
SHE IS RESPONSIBILITY PARTY ORDERING HER TO PAY $78 OF PARKING VIOLATION AND FAILURE TO A PERIOD WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING SENT OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE SHE COULD INCURRED ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
[B. 21-560 CE 421 N 15TH ST Alouption, Guesty K & Joseph A Chad Dawson]
>> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 21-560, 521 NORTH 15TH STREET OWNED
[00:50:05]
BY DUSTY KAY AND JOSEPH. THE PROPERTY WAS CITED MARCH 15*9 OF 2021. SUBSECTION 1, AND 5.AN OBJECT OUTSIDE STORAGE. 24-19, 24-20.
I WOULD LIKE TO PUT ON RECORD THAT WAS ON COMPLY COMPARED TO THE HEARING. A VIOLATION EXISTS.
THE VIOLATION HAS BEEN GIVEN TEN DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF
$100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. >> OKAY.
THANK YOU. >> SO THE PHOTOGRAPHS DISPLAYED ON THE SCREEN, DID YOU TAKE THOSE PHOTOS?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> DO THEY FAIRLY AND
ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> YOU HAVE THEM IN PAPER FORM? >> YES I DO.
>> WE ASK THAT THEY ARE PART OF THE FILE AND THEY BE ADMITTED AS CITY'S ONE COMPOSITE NOTING NO RESPONDENT PRESENT FOR THE
RECORD. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED.
NOTE THAT NO RESPONDENT IS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THEM.
DID YOU SPEAK WITH THEM? >> I WAS GOING TO ASK TO PUT ON RECORD. I WENT OUT THERE ON TKWROED TAKE PHOTOS BEFORE TODAY'S HEARING AND I RAN INTO THE SON OF ONE OF THE TENANTS THERE AND I TOLD HIM THAT THE CASE WAS GOING TO COURT TODAY AND I TOLD HIM WE CITED IT FOR AND HE NEEDS TO APPEAR. HE TOOK MY BUSINESS CARD AND SAID HE WILL GIVE IT TO HIS DAD BUT NO ONE APPEARED.
>> IS THIS LIKE A GARAGE? >> A CARPORT.
DOES THE SON HAVE ANY RESPONSE? >> HE ACTUALLY JUST CAME DOWN FROM VIRGINIA TO VISIT. SO HE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT I WAS
TALKING ABOUT. >> ALL RIGHT, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND NUMBER ONE THAT SECTION 125315 SUBPARAGRAPH I, 2, B HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH. BUT THERE REMAIN TWOS OTHER VIOLATIONS AND I DO FIND THAT THEY ARE IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE OF ORDINANCE. I WILL GIVE THEM 20 DAYS TO COMPLY. IF NOT THEY WILL BE FINED $100 PER DAY. THEY HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
NEXT CASE? >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 21-342.
[F. 21-342 CE 1301 Delaware Ave Lareste Justin Isaac Saucedo]
1301 DELAWARE AVENUE. THE OWNER IS FORT PIERCE.>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> I TPHAOUPBD VIOLATION EXIST -- I FOUND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTED. AT LEAST THE RESPONSIBILITY PARTY FOR THE VIOLATION. I WOULD GIVE HIM 15 DAYS TO COMPLY IN LIGHT OF THE WEATHER. IF NOT A FINE OF $150 PER DAY
[00:55:01]
WILL BE ASSESSED. 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.[H. 21-544 CE 1140 Avenue D Cephus Cruickshak Chad Dawson]
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 21-504, 1140, AVENUE D.
>> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 21-544. 11:40 AVENUE D OWNED BY CRSANK.
PROPERTY WAS CITED MARCH 13TH, 2021.
PIANO POTENTIAL TREATMENT. 24-20, 24-21, SECTION ONE AND 5. OUTSIDE STORAGE.
THE CITY REQUEST THAT IT'S SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATION AS IS. THE VIOLATOR GIVEN 30 DAYS TO
COMPLY OR $100 A DAY. >> ARE THOSE THE SAME PHOTOS ON
THE SCREEN NOW? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> DID YOU TAKE THEM? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
DID YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK?
>> I HAVE NOT MET HIM DAY IN MY LIFE?
>> I HAVE NOT MET HIM. I HAVE BEEN TO THE PROPERTY SEVERAL TIMES. THERE ARE TENANTS LIVING IN THERE BUT WE SENT A LETTER FOR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AND THEY CAME AND THEY WAS UNABLE TO FORWARD TO HIM TO THE LIST HE HAS ON PROPERTY APPRAISER. I DON'T KNOW FOR SURE IF THAT'S HIS PROPER ADDRESS OR NOT BUT HE HAS NOT GOT IN TOUCH WITH ME
>> I FIND HE IS NOT PRESENT. BUT DO I FIND HE'S RESPONSIBLE FOR VIOLATION AT 1140 AVENUE D. I WILL GIVE HIM 30 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
HE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU.
>> OKAY. OUR NEXT CASE IS 02-8799.
[A. 02-8799 CE 709 S 23rd Street US Bank Trust NA (TR) Peggy Arraiz]
709 SOUTH 23RD STREET. U.S. BANK TRUST.THIS IS A LIEN REDUCTION. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE I'LL BE
PRESENTING THIS THIS MORNING. >> THANK YOU.
>> THIS IS CASE 02-8799 FOR 709 SOUTH 23RD STREET.
THIS CASE WAS INITIATED 2002 AND PREVIOUSLY OWNED PRIOR TO IT BEING FORECLOSED. THE BANK FAILED TO LIST THIS LIEN IN THE FORECLOSURE SO THE LIEN REMAINS VALID AND ENACTIVE.
THE PROPERTY WAS CITED FOR AN UNLICENSED VEHICLE.
ON NOVEMBER 6TH, 2002, FOUND MS. GIBSON IN VIOLATION OR BE FINED $100 A DAY. THE FINES WERE START? ED DECEMBER OF 2002 UNTIL THE LIEN WAS FILED IN JANUARY OF 2003. THE PROPERTY WAS IN COMPLIANCE OCTOBER 2003 AND THE FINE STOPPED BUT THE LIEN WAS NEVER RESOLVED AND THEN WE RECEIVED AN APPLICATION THROUGH OUR FAST TRACK PROGRAM WITH $3,000 TO SETTLE TO WHICH STAFF IS TKPWRAOEABLE TO THAT. AGREEABLE TO THAT.
I NEED TO LIST THE 7 CRITERIA. THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE VIOLATION WAS MINOR. OUR ACTION TAKEN BY THE VIOLATOR TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION.
THE VEHICLE WAS REMOVED. THE LINK OF TIME WAS 18 MONTHS.
NUMBER OF TIMES THE VIOLATOR WAS PREVIOUSLY FOUND IN VIOLATION WAS TWO INCLUDING THIS REQUEST.
SO THIS LIEN AND ONE OTHER. THERE WAS 25 TOTE THE INCLUDING ONE IN COMPLIANCE BY THE CITY. TWO CODE CASES WHICH I REFERENCED EARLIER AND THEN 23 LOT CLEARING OR CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE ALL WHICH WERE COMPLIED.
ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WE'RE NOT AWARE OF ANY AND IS THERE ANY PENDING VIOLATIONS ON THE PROPERTY AND THERE IS NONE.
THAT'S JUST FOR THE RECORD. AND THEN STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVING THE OFFICER OF $3,000 TO RESOLVE THE LIEN.
[01:00:03]
>> ALL RIGHT BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STAFF AND AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES, I WILL FIND IT $3,000 AS PROVIDED IN THE AGREEMENT AND HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
DOES THAT MEET THE THRESHOLD BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OR THE
>> DO NOT NEED TO GO TO CITY COMMISSION.
ONCE PAYMENT IS RECEIVED. >> THANK YOU.
>>> THAT IS BASED ON THE STIPULATION BETWEEN THE
>> OKAY. OUR FINAL CASE IS 18-1013, 318 NORTH 18TH COURT AT ANTHONY L SMITH.
I WILL DO THIS ONE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
[B. 18-1013 CE 318 N 18th Court Anthony L Smith Peggy Arraiz]
THIS CASE WAS INITIATED APRIL 4TH, 2018 AND BEFORE YOU AS A LIEN REDUCTION BUT THROUGH OUR FAST TRACK SYSTEM LIKE THE PREVIOUS ONE. THE VIOLATIONS WERE 1646, 4748, OUTSIDE STORAGE AND 1646, 47, 48, SUBSECTION 11 OUTSIDE STORAGE AND IN DOOR FURNITURE. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE YOU FOUND THE OWNER PROVIDED FIVE DAYS TO COMPLY OR FINED $150 A DAY.IN AUGUST 2018 THE FINES STARTED AND FEBRUARY 2019 THE ORDERS SAID THE CLOSING LIEN WAS ISSUED.
ON MARCH 3RD, 2021, THE WAS BROUGHT IN COMPLIANCE AND THE FINES WERE STOPPED AND THEN IN APRIL WE RECEIVE THE REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE LIEN VIA THE FAST TRACK SYSTEM TO WHICH STAFF IS AGREEABLE. I NEED READ THE CRITERIA IN.
THE VIOLATION AGAIN WAS MINOR. IT WAS OUTSIDE STORAGE.
THE OWNER REMOVED THE ITEMS FROM THE YARD AND THE CARPORT.
AND THIS IS ANOTHER CASE JUST SO YOU'RE AWARE WHERE THE PROPERTY APPRAISER ADDRESS FAILED UP TO DATE WHEN THEY
SO THE NOTICES WERE NOT BEING ADDRESSED.
THE TIME BRING THE PROPERTY COMPLIANCE WAS THREE YEARS AND THAT IS DUE TO NO NOTICE BEING SPWRAO*EUFD THAT PROPERTY OWNER WHICH HAS NOW CORRECTED THE PROPERTY ADDRESS.
>> THIS IS THE ONLY CASE BROUGHT BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AND NO OTHER NOTICES THE OF THE VIOLATION TO BE ADDRESSED. THERE'S NO FACTORS OTHER THAN THE ADDRESS PROBLEM AND THERE'S NO PENDING VIOLATIONS.
SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AGREE TO THE $3,000 WHICH WILL SETTLE THE LIEN WITHOUT GOING TO THE CITY
COMMISSION. >> BASED ON THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PAR TEUR AND THE REPRESENTATION MADE PWEUPL MS. REYES I WILL REDUCE THE LIEN TO $3,000.
NOW, YOU NEED TO KNOW THIS IS ALL THE CASE, RIGHT?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THOSE NOT PRESENT HOW ARE THEY NOTIFY? ED.
>> HER CASE IS REQUIRING A HEARING FOR STATE STATUTE 162.12. A NOTICE HEARING WAS SENT TO THE VIOLATOR'S CERTIFIED MAIL. IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED SIGNED, IT IS PLACED IN THE FILE.
IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED OR UNCLAIMED AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING WITH THE NOTICE OF HEARING ENCLOSED IS SENT TO THE VIOLATOR IN REGULAR U.S. MAIL.
TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING A NOTICE IS POSTED IN THE BULLETIN BOARD IN CITY HALL AND ALSO POSTED AT THE PROPERTY OF QUESTION WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.
IF THE GREEN CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING THE POSTING IS COMPLETED IN THE SAME MANNER AS IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED. FOR CASES NOT MANDATED BY STATE STATUTE, MAILING OF THE NOTICE OF HEARING ARE HANDLED IN THE SAME MANNER STATED PRIOR. IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED, UNCLAIMED OR NOT RETURNED WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE HEARING, A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD IN
>> NOTHING FURTHER. WE ARE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.