[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:21]
YOU WERE GIVEN A CERTAIN AMOUNTF TIME.
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO WISH TO BE HEARD WE WILL CALL ON YOU SHORTLY. THIS IS BEING TELEVISED LIVE ON THE FORT PIERCE TV STATION. TWO, DOES ANYBODY NEED AN INTERPRET. IF YOU DON'T MIND, PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANC.
[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
ALLEGIANCE ] >> DO YA'LL REMAIN STANDING SO E
CLERK CAN SWEAR YOU IN. >> YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
>> THANK YOU. >> CALL THE FIRST CASE.
[B. IDENTIFICATION OF CASES IN COMPLIANCE OR RESCHEDULED]
[A. 21-1422 PK 100 Blk N 2nd St Michael Gray Janey Vanderhorst]
[B. 21-0308 CE 2806 S US Highway 1 Invest LP Heather Debevec]
[C. 21-0486 CE 1511 Avenue O Raphael, Henri Heather Debevec]
[D. 21-500 CE 1215 Kentucky Ave The AC Trust Isaac Saucedo]
[F. 21-0014 CE 2506 Avenue L O Ave L Land Trust Janey Vanderhorst]
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, WE WILL LIST THE CASES THAT WERE
COMPLIED OR CONTINUED FIRST. >> THANK YOU.
JC PARK. 21-1296JC PARK, MICHAEL DAVID BOMGARNER. CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP ALIVE INDUSTRIES, INC. 21-1309, LINDA ANNE LLOYD.
21-1294, JC PARK, CRYSTAL MARY BACK, DALE.
21-1422, 100 BLOCK NORTH SECOND STREET, MICHAEL GRAY.
21-3808, 2806 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1.
21-486, 15 AVENUE O. HENRY RAF RAFAEL.
21-142506 AVENUE L LAND TRUST. >> THANK YOU.
[A. 20-1941 CE 3101 Tennessee Ave Randy L. & Rebecca L. Stotler Chad Dawson]
WHEN YOU'RE READY. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 20-941, 3101 TENNESSEE AVENUE. RANDY AND REBECCA SALT HR*E R.
>> -- SALTLER. YOU'VE ALREADY BEEN SWORN IN.
>> GOOD MORNING YOUR YOUR HONOR. THIS IS CASE 20-1941, 101 TENNESSEE AVENUE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED SEPTEMBED , 20. CITED FOR SECTION 24-19, 20, 21 SECTION 10 NUISANCE AS AN OBJECT NON-OPERATABLE VEHICLES. 21-19, 20, 21 SUBJECTION -- SUBSECTION 1. 24-20, 24-21, SUBSECTION 4 OTHER THAN PAVEMENT. ON APRIL 7TH, 2021 SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ROSS FOUND THE OWNERS IN VIOLATION AND FOUD 30 DAYS TO BE FINED $50 PER DAY.
AN EXTENSE OF TIME WAS GRANTED. 60 DAYS FROM THE ORDER OF THE VIOLATION OR BY JUNE 13TH, 2021.
ON JULY 27TH, DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE.
FINES WERE INITIATED. AUGUST 29TH, A NOTICE SENT TO THE OWNERS AUGUST 30TH, 2021 RECEIVED A WRIT WRITTEN
[00:05:04]
REQUEST THE PROPERTY IS STIL IN VIOLATION.>> HAVE THEY SEEN THE PHOTOS? >> NO MA'AM THEY HAVEN'T.
INAUDIBLE ] WE WILL PUT THIS IN AS CITY'S 1 COMPOSITE.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. >> THAT IS ON TO THE HOUSE.
>> THE PROPERTY ON MONDAY STILL HAVE THINGS BEING STORED OUTSIDE. THEY ARE STILL VEHICLES ON THE PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS.
I DIDN'T GET A PHONE CALL FROM R AND NORMALLY TIMES SHE CALLS ME ON MY OFF DAY SO I TRY TO CALL HER WHEN I GO BACK TO WORK. IT GOES TO SROEUL -- VOICE MAIL.
VERY MINIMUM. >> WHO WANTS TO BE HEARD.
STATE YOUR NAME PLEASE. >> RANDY STALTLER.
>> AND YOU OWN THE PROPERTY? >> THIS PROPERTY IS 3103.
>> OKAY WOULD YOU STATE YOUR NAE FOR THE RECORD?
>> REBECCA STATLER. >> DO YA'LL OWN THE PROPERTY?
>> YES. >> AND HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE
ALLEGATIONS? >> THE ALLEGATIONS IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE ANY VIOLATIONS ON 3101.
>> I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET THE STUFF OUT OF THERE.
I'M NOT ABLE TO GET THE STUFF OT OF THERE.
I HAVE THROWN A LOT OF THAT STUF AWAY.
BUT PEOPLE KEEP BRINGING IT BACK AND THROWING IT IN THE YARD.
>> YEAH, THIS IS ALL ONE PARCEL THAT THE PROPERTY HAS LISTED AS 3101 TENNESSEE. IF THEY HAVE TWO DIFFERENT
ADDRESSES FOR THIS ONE PARC. >> THE SECOND ONE IS 3103.
>> STAND THAT BUT THE PROPERTY AAPPRAISER HAD EVERYTHING LISTED UNDER ONE PARCEL. YOU SEE IT'S ON THE COMPUTER IN FRONT OF YOU. EVERYTHING IS UNDER ONE PARCEL.
THEY HAVE A MAIN ADDRESS WITH 31 TENNESSEE.
THAT'S WHAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO UE IS THE INFORMATION THAT'S IN
[00:10:01]
FRONT OF YOU RIGHT HERE. WHILE YOU MIGHT HAVE ANOTHER ADDRESS FOR THIS AREA HERE E PROPERTY . . SOR APPRAISER S UNDER ONE AND THAT'S WHAT WE USED.>> SO WHY DOES IT SAY -- HE WAS THE EXFIRE CHIEF. AND THIS IS WHAT HE HAD.
>> WHAT DO I GOT TO DO TO GET TS STRAIGHTENED OUT?
>> YOU HAVE A -- A PROPERTY . .. APPRAISER'S OFFICE.
>> THAT'S OUR GRANDDAUGHTER'S TM TRAMPOLINE.
>> THERE'S A NUMBER OF PHOTOGRA. >> THAT TRUCK HAS DAMAGE IS STIL THERE. IT NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED OR REGISTERED OR HAS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY.
IT CAN'T STAY THERE. >> WELL, OUR SON IT'S IN HIS NA.
>> I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW WHAT'S HERE.
SO THERE'S BUCKETS HERE. THERE'S MISLAY MOUSE ITEMS -- MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. YOU CAN SEE THERE'S SOME STUFF HERE. YOU CAN SEE A SINKS.
ALL THAT HAS TO BE TAKEN OFF. >> OKAY.
IN THE BACK. THERE'S A COUPLE TIRES.
THERE'S A BREAK. THERE'S A LOT OF STUFF AROUND TT HAS TO GET IN THE STORAGE SD HERE.
WE WILL HAVE TO GET CLEANED UP N THE PROPERTY.
>> . >> OUR SON HAS BEEN SICK.
HE HAS AN INFECTION IN HIM FROM HIS LEGS.
HE SHOULDN'T HAVE LEFT THE HOSPITAL.
>> MA'AM. THAT STUFF THERE IS A LOT OF THT STUFF IS NOT MINE. I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHERE IT COME
FROM. >> BUT YOU OWN THE PROPERTY.
AND IT'S ON YOUR PROPERTY AND IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY.
YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF IT. IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHERE IT COMES FROM YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF IT.
>> I'M DISABLED. I'M NOT ABLE TO GET OUT THERE AD
[00:15:02]
LIFT THOSE BIG BUCKETS AND STUFF LIKE I USED TO.>> SO SPECIAL MAGISTRATE I DON'T MEAN TO INTERRUPT.
PROCEDURALLY I WANT IT TO BE CLR WHERE WE ARE.
WE ARE AT THE POINT OF A MAXEY HEARING.
THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION AND SO THE ONLY ISSUE TODAY IS WHETHER OR NOT IT'S IN COMPLIANCE.
I THINK THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEMONSTRATE THAT IT'S NOT.
SO THE NEXT STEP IS JUST HOW DOE FIX IT AND HOW DO WE MOVE
FORWARD? >> DID YOU HEAR WHAT THE COUNSER SAY? ES.
>> YES. >> DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ND
YOU OWN THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOU'VE GOT TO REMOVE THE STUFF FROM THE PROPERTY.
>> WE HAVE A STORAGE UNIT. >> LET ME EXPLAIN SOMETHING TO YOU. YOU'RE NOT IN COMPLIANCE.
THEY ARE GOING TO CONTINUE TO RN UNTIL YOU CLEAN IT UP. UNTIL YOU GET THE ARTICLES OR ITES OFF THE PROPERTY.
THE FINES WILL CONTINUE. I CANNOT ENTERTAIN REDUCING THE FINE OR STOPPING THE FINE BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT IN COMPLIANCE. YOU HAVEN'T DONE WHAT YOU WERE
SUPPOSED TO DO. >> WE GOT A LOT OF IT.
I HAD SOME GUY TAKE A LOT OF IT AND THROW IT -- I THINK IT'S
TO GET IT DONE. >> I UNDERSTAND THAT.
BUT YOU HAVE GOT TO -- IS THE TRASH PICK UP IN YOUR AREA?
>> YES. PUT IT ON THE CURB SO THEY CAN PICK IT UP. THEY CAN'T PICK UP EVERYTHING IS STILL YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO CLEAN UP THIS PROPERTY.
I CANNOT ENTERTAIN ANYTHING ABOT FINES BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT IN COMPLIANCE. SO SOME OF THIS STUFF YOU CAN SIT OUTSIDE AD YOU YOU CAN CALL SOMEBODY TO HELP YOU.
YOU'VE GOT TO CLEAN UP THE PROPERTY IS THE BOTTOM LINE
HERE. >> THAT'S WHY I RENTED THAT CAR BECAUSE IT HAD A TRAILER HIH ON THE BACK.
WE HAVE A STORAGE UNIT AND OUR N GOT SICK MONDAY AND HE WAS GOING TO LOAD A LOT OF THOSE BUCKETS THAT ARE IN THE BACK THERE AND PUT THEM IN STORAE UNITS.
>> I UNDERSTAND THAT. >> WHEN YOU WERE HERE YOU MENTIONED YOUR SON WAS GOING TO DO THIS OR THAT.
I CANNOT ENTERTAIN ANYTHING TO HELP YOU BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT
HELPING YOURSELF. >> IHAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET RIDF
THEM VEHICLES FOR MONTHS NO. >> IT'S YOUR PROPERTY.
>> IT'S YOUR PROPERTY. >> I UNDERSTAND THAT.
>> SPECIAL IMAGINE STRAIT. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THIS MATTER BE CONTINUED TO YOUR DECEMBER 1ST HEARING PERHAPS THAT THE TIME WE CAN THEN ADDRESS THE FINES IF NT STAFF WOULD BE REQUESTING AT THAT TIME THAT THE LEAN BE FILED. AT THIS TIME THIS TIME STAFF WIL ASK FOR 60 MORE DAYS FOR THM TO TRY AND COMPLY AND WE BRG THIS BACK TO YOU DECEMBER 1 REQUEST EITHER THE ABOUT TO ADDRESS THE FINES OR THE REQUEST TO POSE A LIEN AT TT
TIME. >> DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT SHE'S
>> SHE'S BASICALLY GIVING YOU ME TIME.
FINES ARE RUNNING AGAINST YOU AL BECAUSE YOU'RE THE OWNER.
TRY TO GET IT CLEANED UP. IF YOU TRY TO GET IT CLEANED UP.
IF YOU'RE NOT SHURP THEN GET -- BUT YOU GOT TO CLEAN THIS U.
>> I'M TRYING TO -- THE STAFF HERE.
AND ME I'M TRYING TO HELP YOU. YOU'VE GOT TO GET THIS STUFF CLEANED UP. I DIDN'T PUT THE STUFF THERE.
[00:20:54]
I'M RESPONSIBLE FOR IT. >> YES YOU ARE.
GET THAT OFF YOUR PROPERTY. IT'S NOT YOUR RESPONSIBILITY.
THE END RESULT IS YOU'RE RESPONSIBILITY BECAUSE IT IS
ON YOUR PROPERTY. >> THAT IS UNTIL DECEMBER 1ST. THAT WILL GET IT CLEANED UP AGA.
THEY WILL HELP YOU OUT. BECAUSE THE FINES ARE STILL
>> WELL, THEY WILL KEEP RUNNING. THEY WILL COME BACK AND TRY TO T THEM STOPPED AND GET THAT IN THE FUTURE.
>> WE LIVE ON SOCIAL SECURITY. >> DO I, TOO -- I DO TOO.
>> SO TRY AND GET THAT TAKEN CAE OF.
WE WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS. >> ALL RIGHT.
THANK YOU. BUT DON'T LET YOUR KIDS OR WHOER JUST DUMP STUFF ON YOUR PROPERTY.
YOU'RE NOT A DUMPING GROUND. >> YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I KEEP TELLING HIM. HE HAS A SO-CALLED FRIEND AS I CALL HIM HAS A WHITE TRUCK D HE KEEPS BRINGING STUFF HER.
YOU CANNOT BRING THIS STUFF HER. PUT IT BACK IN YOUR TRUCK AND GT
IT OUT OF HERE. >> AND THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE DOIN.
>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. GOOD LUCK.
>>> THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME MR. STATLER.
[B. 20-1254 CE 1711 N 19th Street Willie Keith Jennifer J Keith Glenn R Keith Peggy Arraiz]
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 20-1254, 17, NORTH 19TH STREET.
WILLY KEITH AND GLEN R.KEITH. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATELY READ THS
THIS CASE INITIATED MAY 29TH, 2020.
THIS PROPERTY WAS CITED FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE NOT BECAUSE OF THE GRASS BUT BECAUSE OF THE TREES ON THE PROPERTY THAT WERE OVER GROWN.
THE PROPERTY APPRAISER ONLY LISS THE ADDRESS THAT'S HIGHLIGHD HERE 1711 NORTH 19TH STREET.
ALL NOTICES WERE SENT TO THIS LOCATION AND ALL WERE RETURNED. THAT INCLUDES THE PROPERTY WAS POSTED FOR THE HEARING BUT L WRITTEN NOTICES WERE RETURND UNCLAIMED BECAUSE THIS HOUSE WAS A VACANT HOUSE.
IT WENT THROUGH THE LEGAL PROCES AND CAME TO MY DESK FOR A LN TO BE IMPOSED. PART OF MY POLICY IS I DO A DEEP SEARCH TO SEE ANY CONTACT I CAN.
BECAUSE A LIEN IS A VERY IMPORTT STEP.
I TAKE THAT EXTRA STEP AND WAS ABLE TO LOCATE THE ERRORS OF MR. KEITH. WILLIAM, WILLY, FREE TKEU, FRED, JENNIFER, LORENZO KEITH. I SENT NOTICES TO ALL OF THEM.
WE DID RECEIVE A RESPONSE FROM MR. WILLIAM KEITH IN NORTH CAROLINA. EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DONE BY MAI.
THERE IS NO PHONE NUMBER OR MAILING ADDRESS.
IN ONE OF THE CORRESPONDENTS HE DID PROVIDE US AS VIGIL JACKSON WHO IS MAINTAINS THE LANDSCAPING.
HE IS A FAMILY MEMBERS. I DID TALK TO HIM PRIOR TO THE
[00:25:04]
HEARING. HE HAS TRIMMED THE TREES BUT I BELIEVE THERE'S STILL A DISCONNECT ON WHAT WE'RE ASKING AND WHAT HE'S DOING. WHAT STAFF IS REQUESTING IS THAT THIS MATTER BE CONTINUED TO ALLOW STAFF TO MEET WITH MR. JACKSON NOW THAT WE HAVE HIS CONTACT INFORMATION ANDE KNOW HE'S THE LOCAL REP TOPO TO THE PROPERTY, CLEAR IDENTIFY WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.THIS IS STILL A MASSY HEARING. WE ARE STILL DEALING WITH FINESN BROUGHT THAT BACK AT ANOTHER HEARING.
BECAUSE I BELIEVE THIS CAN BE COMPLIED FAIRLY QUICKLY.
I'M GOING TO SUGGEST THE NOVEMBR 3RD.
I BELIEVE IT WILL BE IN COMPLIAE BY THAT TIME.
I DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S AN ISSU. MR. JACKSON SAID HE CAN MEET WIH STAFF NEXT WEDNESDAY IS. THAT STILL A GOOD DAY?
>> YES. >>> I BELIEVE MR. JACKSON WILL T THIS COMPLIED BEFORE THE HEARING ON THE THIRD WHICH I BELIEF IS SPECIAL MAGISTRATE PELATIER. .
>> I WILL HAVE TO REFUSE MYSELF FROM THIS.
WE WILL HEAR THE STATEMENT FOR E RECORD.
>> WHEN I FIRST TALKED TO SOMEBY ABOUT THIS.
THEY MENTIONED SOMETHING IN THE BACKYARD.
TREES WERE NEVER MENTIONED. I HAVE TO GET UP UNDER NOSE TRES TAKE CARE OF THE GRASS. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY PICTURES. WE MIGHT HAVE THEM.
THE BOTTOM LINE IS WE'RE REQUESTING THE CONTINUATION.
>> THEY GIVE YOU TIME GET WITH STAFF AND SEE WHAT YOU HAVE DONE AND WHAT NEEDS TO BE DE IF ANYTHING AND MAYBE THIS
WILL RESOLVE ITSELF. >> WE CAN GET THEM ADDRESSED
APPROPRIATELY. >> SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING TO NOVEMBER. I'M SURE IT WILL GET DONE.
>> THEY WILL MEET YOU OUT THERE WEDNESDAY.
WE WILL HAVE TO GET TOUCH WITH U ABOUT THE TIME.
>> THANK YOU FOR COMING IN TODA. >> THAT'S IT.
>> YOU'RE DONE. >> NEXT CASE IS 20-2474, 118, AA
[C. 20-2474 CE 118 Alma Court Jeanne Arias Isaac Saucedo]
COURT. JEANY ARIES.>> GOOD MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING.
THE PROPERTY WAS POSTED AND DECLARED AS A NUISANCE.
NOVEMBER 16 OF THAT SAME YEAR. AN INSPECTION OF THE PROPERTY WS MADE. THE VENDOR COMPLETED THE WORK.
[00:30:08]
THE REQUEST FOR INVOICE WAS SENT TO A FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT AD AN E-MAIL FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER WAS RECEIVED REQUESTIG A HEARING. ON SEPTEMBER 21ST, 2021 THE CASE WAS PRESENTED IN FRONTF A IMAGINE MAGISTRATE.AND TO DETERMINE WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE WAS AND IS.
IF YOU DO HAVE PHOTOS. AT THE TIME WHEN WE MEASURED -- WHEN WE MET OUT THERE. IT WS DETERMINED THAT SOME OF THE BUSHES AND TREES THAT WERE T ARE KIND OF BETWEEN HER PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY BEHIND HER.
IF YOU WANT TO PULL UP -- KEEP STROLLING -- KEEP SCROLLING DOWN, DOWN, DOWN. YOU CAN SEE THAT'S SOMEONE ELSES PROPERTY THAT WAS TRIMMED DOWN.
SO THAT TREE THAT I'M STANDING N FRONT OF IS PRETTY MUCH
BETWEEN BOTH PROPERTIES. >> BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER.
CAN WE MOVE THESE IN EVIDENCE AS CITIES 1 COMPOSITE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ASSUMING THERE'SO OBJECTION?
>> YES. >> SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU.
PLEASE PROCEED. >> I DON'T KNOW IF THEY CAN PULL UP ONE OF THE OTHER PHOTOS. THAT'S PROETY -- PRETTY MUCH
BETWEEN THOSE PROPERTIES. . >> THERE WERE SOME BUSHES TRIMMD SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SEE ON E PHOTO.
IT'S HARD TO DETERMINE WHO IS TE OWNER OF THE TREE.
>> THREAT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THE QUEST THAT WAS ASSESSED AGAINST MS. ARIAS WAS $820. THEY ARE RECOMMENDING WE CUT THT
YOU ARE TALKING $410. >> YES, MA'AM.
>> WOULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD?
>> JEANY ARIS. >> YOU WERE SWORN PREVIOUSLY?
>> YES. >> HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE
ALLEGATIONS? >> CAN I TAKE A LOOK AT THE BEFE AND AFTER PICTURES FROM WHEN IT WAS ACTUALLY CUT?
[00:35:03]
THESE WOULD BE SOME OF THE BEFOE PHOTOS.>> THESE ARE THE FIRST BEFORE FE POPES.
>> YOU HAVE THE BEFORE PHOTOS ON HERE ON THE SCREEN.
>> YEAH, I HAD EVERY SINGLE PHO. >> THAT'S ONE OF THEM.
THIS AREA THAT YOU HAD JUST GONE AROUND.
THAT WAS THE BEFORE -- I MEAN -- BEFORE AND PHOTOS.
>> CORRECT, RIGHT NOW. IT SHOWS WHERE THEY CUT AFTERWA.
THESE TWO CLUMPS OF GRASS. EVERYTHING ELSE WAS ON THE PROPERTY BEHIND MINE OR NEXT TO MINE.
IF YOU CAN GO BACK TO -- >> I'M NOT SURE WHICH ONE.
LET ME GO BACK TO THE VERY BEGINNING. .
>> THERE'S ONE THAT HAS TWO PHOTOS.
>> ALL OF OUR PHOTOS ARE SINGLE. TO PUT THEM ON THE COMPUTER, THEY'RE NOT DOUBLED. THAT'S A PRINTOUT.
THERE ARE PHOTOS THAT ARE SINGL. >> I REMEMBER WHEN THEY WERE
SHOWING IT, IT WAS ON ONE P. >> IT WAS SHOWN ON THE FILE.
>> THAT'S THIS WEEK. >> IF IT WAS SHOWN AT THE LAST HEARING IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ADMITTED.
IT IS WHICHEVER THOSE PHYSICAL PHOTOS ARE KEPT.
>> THE PHOTOS ARE ATTACHED TO TE AGENDA QUICK.
YEAH, THAT ONE. EVERYTHING HERE.
SO THIS IS THE BEFORE AND THIS S THE AFTER.
>> YES. >> AND YOU CAN SEE THE OPENING N BETWEEN. THAT'S APPROXIMATELY WHERE THE CORNER OF MY PROPERTY LINE S AND YOU CAN SEE THAT FROM OE OF THE OTHER PICTURES THAT I DON'T KNOW IF HE TOOK IT FAR ENOUGH BACK BUT THAT OPENING IS THE SOUTH SIDE OF MY PROPERTY. VERY LITTLE WAS DE OVER HERE.
ALMOST NOTHING IF YOU SCROLL BAK UP.
THIS IS TREE WORK THAT WAS DONE. YOU CAN SEE THIS HERE ON THE BUILDING VERSUS HERE ON THE BUILDING TO SHOW.
SO TO SAY HIGH TPHO*EBGS THIS BUILDING YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE GRASS HER.
IN ADDITION TO, YOU CAN SEE IT'S ALL THE TREES ARE LIFTED TO HERE WHERE ALL OF THE UNDER BRUSH AND TREE GROWTH IS HERE. SO STAFF BELIEVES THAT AN ASSESSMENT FROM THE WORK DOE BY THE VENDOR IS TEAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION TO THIS ONE TE BACK HERE WHERE WE AGREE IS PARTIALLY ON OR OFF THE PROPERTY LINE.
[00:40:07]
THERE'S MUCH NOR TREE TRIMMING THAT DAY.>> NONE OF THAT IS ON MY PROPERTY.
THAT BUILDING SITS ON THE EXTREE SOUTH END OF THE ADJOINING LOT. ALL OF THAT STUFF THAT WAS CUT T THAT SHE JUST WAS TALKING ABOUT -- AND THE GARBAGE DISPOSAL THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT A MATTRESS THAT WAS ON TOP OF THE FENCE. THE FENCE DIVIDES TWO OTHER PROPERTIES. MY PROPERTY DOESN'T HAVE IS NOT- THAT WAS TALKING ABOUT THE OPENING, THE CLEARING ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE. THAT IS BEHD MY PROPERTY.
NONE OF THAT WAS ON MY PROPERTY. THE ONLY TREE THAT WAS ON THE PROPERTY -- SORRY. HE SHOWED THAT IT'S THE ONE TREE GOES BETWEEN BOTH PROPERTIE. SOME OF IT HANG ON MY SIDE BUT E MAJORITY ON THE OTHER SIDE. THAT CLEARING.
ALL THAT BACK IN THERE IS ON THE OTHER PROPERTY.
THAT'S NOT ON MY PROPERTY. >> MY PROPERTY ENDS AT THAT TRE.
SO ALL OF THE STUFF THAT WAS CUT BEHIND BELONGED TO THE
ADJOINING PROPERTY. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IF I MAY -
>> YES, PLEASE. >> WHAT WE NEED DO IS GO BACK TO THAT NEW PICTURE THAT WE INTRODUCED TODAY WITH THE RD LINE DRAWN THROUGH IT. I'D ASK CODE OFFICER SALCEDO TOE ABLE TO DO TO MAKE A BRIEF RETKUTLE.
-- REBUTTAL. >> WHILE SHE'S CORRECT THAT SOME OF THE WORK THAT WAS DONE WS NOT ON HER PROPERTY, SOME WS DONE ON THE PROPERTY. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAE AN ACCURATE RECORD IF NECESSARY.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPH YU SEE THE BLUE HOUSE IN THE PHOTO. THE AREA TO THE RIGHT SIDE WHERE THE ARROW CURRENTLY IS RIGHT NOW -- IS THAT THE PROPERTYF THE RESPONDENT? OR THE PROPERTY OF SOMEONE ELSE? NOR IS A YELLOW STRENGTH. THAT DID BELIEVE THAT THAT'S WHE HER PROPERTY LINE END. WHEN THE CASE WAS FIRST INITIATD AND THE PROPERTY WAS FIRST POSTED, WAS THERE WORK THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE IN THAT SECTION?
>> YES. >> SO WERE THE OPEN ROADS.
WAS THAT PART OF THE TPWHAEUL WE RECEIVE?
>> MAY I RECALL? MAY I RESPOND TO THAT?
>> I APOLOGIZE FOR THE CODE COMPLIANCE.
MR. AOEU ISAAC SAID I HAD MISMEASURED AND MY PROPERTY
[00:45:01]
EXTENDED BEYOND THAT YELLOW LINE.WHEN WE WERE OUT THERE HE SAID THAT I ACTUALLY THAT IS IRRELEVANT. AS YOU CAN SEE WE'VE GOT BACK TO THAT. THE CLUMPS OF GRASS THAT WERE CT IS JUST THAT CORNER WHERE TE STAKE IS AND TO THAT YELLOW LINE WAS TWO CLUMPS OF GRAS. THAT TREE AND THAT LIMB THAT'S SHOWING RIGHT THERE. THAT WASN'T CUT.
THAT'S JUST BROKEN DOWN. EVERYTHING THAT WAS CUT OR THE MAJORITY OF EVERYTHING THAT WAS CUT WAS BEHIND IT.
IF YOU REMEMBER THE BEFORE AND AFTER PICTURES THERE'S A BIG WIDE OPENING THAT YOU CAN NW SEE ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE
OTHER PROPERTIES. >> YOU DIDN'T TAKE CARE -- THE
CITY HAD TO DO THAT. >> THE CITY HAD TO DO IT.
>> CAN I ADDRESS THAT? >> LET ME FINISH.
THIS CASE WAS BEFORE ME EARLIER. SOME OF THE ISSUES WERE BROUGHT UP. WHERE WAS YOUR PROPERTY?
>> CAN I ADDRESS THAT? >> THEY WERE ORIGINALLY ASKING R $820. THEY AGREED TO REDUCE THAT IN HALF. IT'S NOT THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILY TO CUT AN MAINTAIN YOUR PROPERTY.
NOW YOU MAY RESPOND. >> THE MAJORITY OF THE WORK THAT WAS DONE WAS DONE ON MY PROPERTY.
NOT HALF OF IT. NOT A YACHTERRER QUARTER OF IT.
YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWN THE DIFFERENT TIMES THAT HE WAS TAKING PICTURES. I WAS MAINTAINING THAT PROPERTY.
>> I NEVER GOT A KNOWIST TEUS SAYING WHAT YOU'RE DOING IS NOT ENOUGH. THERE WAS NO FOLLOW UP.
IT WAS JUST YOU'RE OUT OF COMPLIANCE AND SIX MONTHS
LATER, I GET A BILL. >> THE PROPERTY WAS POSTED,
>> AND THAT WAS NOTICED. >> YES AND I TOOK CARE OF WHAT I THOUGHT WAS THE NUISANCE THT I HAD BEEN TOLD ABOUT.
WE CLEANED UP THAT PROPERTY WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THOSE TWO CLUMPS OF GRASS BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T GO FAR ENOUGH BACK TO MOW. THERE WERE TWO CLUMPS OF GRASS THAT WERE CUT. I DO HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION, THO.
HE WAS TALKING ABOUT CUTTING UNR THE TREE.
THERE WAS LITTLE CUT UNDER THE TREE.
EVERYTHING BEHIND THAT TREE IS E ADJOINING PROPERTY.
AND HE WAS TALKING ABOUT HOW HIH THE GRASS IS AGAINST THAT HOUSE WHICH YOU CAN SEE IT S NOW GROWN BACK UP.
>> MY QUESTION IS, YOU CAN SEE WHAT'S IN THE HIGHEST WERE L THE VINES THAT WERE ON THE FENCE.
WHY WAS --. >> A MAN HAD BEEN CLEARLY DEFIND FOR MY PROPERTY LINE. THE BOTTOM LINE IS, I WAS
[00:50:27]
MAINTAINING A PROPERTY. IF I WASN'T MAINTAINING IT TO TE LEVEL THAT THEY HAD EXPECTED WHY COULDN'T THEY HAVE CALLD OR SENT ME A NOTICE SAYING YOU'RE STILL OUT OF COMPLIANCE. JUST AFTER 6 MONTHS THAT YOU ARE STILL OUT THEY JUST DON'T DO SOMETHING TO IT.>> THE PROPERTY WAS POSTED AND DECLARED WAS A NUISANCE.
>> I ADDRESSED WHAT I THOUGHT WS THE NUISANCE.
AND ON TOP OF THAT THE MAJORITYF THAT $820 WAS WORK DONE ON E OTHER PROPERTIES. YOU CAN SEE --
>> THIS AREA -- I'M SORRY TO INTERRUPT YOU BUT YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY HAS REDUCED THAT $820 TO $410 FR THE WORK DONE ON YOUR PROPERTY.
>> BUT THEY DIDN'T DO HALF OF TE WORK ON MY PROPERTY.
THERE WAS GARBAGE REMOVAL OF A MATTRESS.
THEY DID TREE TRIMMING ON THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES.
HE TALKED ABOUT A MATTRESS ON TE FENCE.
THEY WERE ON THE OTHER SIDE. NEITHER OF THOSE PROPERTIES ARE MINE. SOMEBODY WAS LIVING ON THE ADJOINING PROPERTY AND THROWING GARBAGE ON ANOTHER
PERSON'S PROPERTY. >> DID YOU DO ANYTHING ABOUT
THAT. >>> I DIDN'T KNOW IF SOMEBODY WS LIVING ON SOMEBODY. THAT IS NOT MY JOB TO SEE IF SOMEONE IS LIVING ON SOMEBOY ELSE'S PROPERTY.
>> I DON'T MEAN TO INTERRUPT AGAIN.
I NEED WE NEED BRING IT BACK TO ISSUE THAT IS A NARROW ISSUE BEFORE YOU AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
THIS WAS TESTIMONY AT THE PRIOR HEARING THAT THERE WAS SOME
DEBRIS. >> THE WAY BOTH WERE MAINTAINED MADE IT VERY DIFFICULT FOR SOMEONE TO GO OUT THERE AND DETERMINE WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE STARTED AND WHERE THE
PROPERTY LINE ENDED. >> THE CITY WOULD ASK THAT YOU MAKE A FINDING WHETHER YOU WILL ACCEPT THE TESTIMONY TT AS FAR AS WHERE THAT LINE IS AS PRESENTED WITH CITY STAFF AND WHETHER OR NOT THE AMOUT REQUESTED WAS CONSISTENT WIH WHAT YOU SEE IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> WHICH IS FINE IF YOU LOOK AT THE BEFORE PICTURE.
WHAT IS ON THAT LINE. IT'S TWO CLUMPS OF GRASS.
THEY WERE HIGH BUT AS YOU CAN SE IN THIS PICTURE, WE WENT OUT AND MOWED. THIS WAS IN DECEMBER.
>> THIS WAS OBVIOUSLY BEING MAINTAINED.
IF YOU LOOK IN THE VERY BACK THE ARE TWO CLUMPS OF GRASS THAS HIGHER THAN THE REST. THAT WAS ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF TT LINE. DOESN'T COST $400 TO W TWO CLUMPS OF GRASS.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? ALL RIGHT.
THEN BASED ON THE TESTIMONY AND EVERYTHING THAT'S PRESENTEDI WILL REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF THE -- NOT A LIEN IT WAS THE WORK DONE ON THE PROPERTY. I WILL REDUCE IT FROM $820 TO
[00:55:04]
$410. HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO PAY THAT? HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU NEED? ARE.>> I'LL PAY TODAY IF YOU CAN TAE A CHECK.
>> YOU CAN PAY IT TODAY. >> MAY I ASK ONE OTHER QUESTION.
HAVE ANY OF THE ADJOINING PROPEY O*ERPBS BEEN OWNERS BEEN CID FOR THE GROWTH OF THEIR PROPERTIES?
>> YOU WILL HAVE TO GET WITH THE CITY WITH THAT.
YOU CAN DISCUSS THAT WITH THEM OUTSIDE OF CHAMBERS.
CAN YOU REPEAT THAT AMOUNT? >> $410.
[D. 20-2045 CE 2201 S 29th St Deborah A Norvell Vivian Norvell (EST) John Norvell Jr Chad Dawson]
>> NEXT CASE WHEN YOU'RE READY. >> OUR NEXT CASE WILL BE 20-204.
>> YES, MA'AM, MY MOTHER AND DEA NORVEL WHICH IS MY AUNT ARE
AVAILABLE BY PHONE. >> CAN YOU GIVE ME THE NUMBER
UNCOMFORTABLE. >> WOULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR
MY NAME IS BRETT MCCAIN I'M HERE AS A SON, NEPHEW OF THE OF THE OWNERS. CHARLES, LANA MCCAIN AND DEBRA
THIS IS CASE 20-2045, 2201 SOUTH 29TH STREET OWNED BY DEBRA A NORVEL. JOHN NORVEL, JR, THE PROPERTY WS CITED FOR 24-19 AS A NUISANE ON PROPERTY PROHIBITED.
SUBSECTION 9, SUBJECTION 18, NUISANCE AS A CONDITION.
ON NOVEMBER 3RD OF 2020. CODE ENFORCEMENT CITED THE PROPERTY AS A NUISANCE FOR T CLEARING VIOLATION.
ON NOVEMBER 16TH, IT'S -- AN INSPECTION ON THE PROPERTY S MADE. ON DECEMBER 14TH DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE, PROPERTY WAS BASED ON OUR BID LIST.
ON MARCH 30TH, 2021, THE VENDOR COMPLETED THE BID WORK. ON JUNE 7TH, 2021 A REQUEST FOR AN INVOICE WAS SENT TO FINANCE ON JULY 13TH OF 2021, A LETTER RECEIVED FROM PROPERTY OWNER QUESTIONED A
MASSY HEARING. >> THERE'S TWO CASES IN FRONT OF
[01:00:09]
YOU TODAY FOR THE SAME ISSUES.THE OTHER ONE IS FOR 2209 SOUTH 29TH STREET AND THE PROPERTIES ARE COMBINED. THEY ARE ADJACENT.
>> IT'S THE SAME PHOTOS. >> THIS TIME WE MOVE THE PHOTOSN
AS CITY'S ONE COMPOSITE. >> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> ONCE THEY GO UP ON THE SCREEN CAN YOU WALK US THROUGH?
>>> YOU WANT ME TO SHOW ALL THE PHOTOS OR THESE LAST PHOTOST
THE END HERE IN OCTOBER? >>> YEAH.
IT WAS RESENT OUT BECAUSE THERE WAS AN ERROR ON OUR END.
>> THE LETTER STILL CAME BACK TT IT WASN'T DELIVABLE.
THE LAST PHOTOS TAKEN WAS ON MARCH 28 WHEN I WAS CONTRACD THAT THE PROPERTY WAS NOW IN COMPLIANCE.
IT'S THE TRIMMING OF THE TREES T ANY MOWING OF THE GRASS.
>> FOR THIS PARTICULAR AREA, YE. >> FOR THIS AREA 20-045.
>> THIS BILL WAS $3875. AND THESE ARE THE VENDORS BEFORE AND AFTER PHOTOS. WE HAVE ONE FOCAL POINT HERE TO SHOW THE BEFORE AND THE AFTER.
YOU SEE THE SAME IN THIS BEFORE AND AFTER PHOTO.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO MA'AM.
>> YES, MA'AM. JUST AS A CLARIFICATION ARE WE N BOTH CASES RIGHT NOW? IT DOESN'T MATTER TO ME.
>> I THINK THEY BOTH TELL A STOY TOGETHER.
I THINK THAT'S COMFORTABLE IF THAT'S PREFERRED.
>> I HAVE ONE FOLLOW UP. >> OKAY TO CLARIFY SOMETHING.
I SAW THE PUBLIC RECORDS. WE WERE NOT AWARE OF IT UNTIL WE IMMEDIATELY RESPONDED. MY AUNT RESPONDED WITH FORMER LETTER TO THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE.
MY FAMILY HAS BEEN PAYING FOR IT TO BE MAINTAINED.
THERE WAS A LAPSE FROM DECEMBER 10-JULY 28 OF 2021.
WAS NOT PERFORMING THE WORK. YOU WILL SEE WHERE THERE WAS A
[01:05:02]
LETTER BY MR. DAWSON SENT OUT.NEITHER ONE OF THOSE WERE RECEID IS AND A FOLLOW UP ON
SEPTEMBER 29TH. >> WE DIDN'T SEE THE SEPTEMBER 15TH LETTERS BUT IT WAS MAINTAINED ON SEPTEMBER 24TH WHICH WAS WHY HE SENT THE FOLLOW UP LETTER. IN THAT FOLLOW UP LETTER ON SEPTEMBER 29TH WHICH WE DIDN'T RECEIVE IT SAYS THAT WHAT'S OUT OF COMPLIANCE NOW IS JUST THE TREES AND SH R*U BS UP TO 7-FEET. NOT MAINTAINING THE TREES.
I THINK THE PHOTOS ACCURATELY DEPICT THAT.
WE DIDN'T KNOW ALL OF THIS WAS GOING ON.
IF WE DID WE WOULD HAVE RESPONDD AND CURED ISSUE.
WE RECEIVED THE GREEN CARD AND T WAS SIGNED BY D.NORVEL.
I DON'T WANT TO SPECULATE BUT I THINK THAT'S MS. DEBRA.
>> ARE WE HANDLING THESE SEPARATELY?
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE I THINK WE WILL HAVE TO COMBINE THEM BH BECAUSE THEY BOTH RELATE DIRECTLY TO EACH OTHER.
IT'S ONE BIG AREA. >> THERE ARE TWO BILLS.
I'M SURE IT'S ONE BIG PROPERTY. >> CAN I CLARIFY.
WERE TWO SETS OF NOTICES SENT? >> IN THE DOCUMENTS THERE IS, Y,
MA'AM. >> CAN I ASK SOME FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS. WE CAN GO BACK.
>> WITH REGARD TO THE NOTICE SET UNDER CASE NUMBER 20-2045.
WALK US THROUGH WHAT KIND OF NOTICE WAS GIVEN ON THAT CA.
WAS IT AN ADDRESS LETTER? DID YOU SEND A SECOND LETTER AFR YOU LEARNED THAT INFORMATIO. YOU SEND THAT BY CERTIFIED MAIL.
>> YES, MA'AM. >> AND WAS THERE A GREEN CARD ASSOCIATED WITH THAT SECOND LETTER?
THE PROPERTY WAS POSTED. >> YOU ACTUALY POSTED THE SIGN THAT WE CAN SEE IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> YOU SEND ANYTHING TO THE PROPERTY LET STPHER.
>> WAS THERE RETURNED MAIL FOR THAT.
>>> THAT WAS SENT REGULAR MAIL, CORRECT?
>> OKAY. >> NOW, MOVING TO CASE NUMBER 20 GOING BACK TO THAT FIRST CAE NUMBER.
WAS THERE ANY OTHER CORRESPONDEE THAT YOU SENT?
>> WHAT'S A FRIENDLY LETTER? WHAT DO WE CALL THAT.
>>> IT WILL BASICALLY SAY THANKS FOR DOING THIS WORK BUT THEY ARE STILL WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.
WE WILL LIST WHAT NEEDS TO BE D. >> DID YOU SEND A LET STPHER.
>> NO I DIDN'T. >> ANYTHING ELSE ON CASE 0245?
WHAT CAME BACK AS UNDELIVABLE. >> THE CERTIFIED LETTER THAT WE SENT OUT WHEN WE FIRST OPEND THE CASE.
[01:10:03]
>> OKAY THE FIRST AND THE SECON? >> YES.
THE ADDRESS IT CAME BACK. >> YOU PUT A PHYSICAL SIGN ON TE
YOU SEBT A LETTER BY REGULAR MAIL.
WAS THAT REGULAR MAIL RETURN? ED.
>> NO MA'AM. I DIDN'T GET THAT.
>> ANY OTHER LETTERS OR NOTICESS FAR AS THAT PARTICULAR CASE
[E. 20-2046 CE 2209 S 29th St Vivian A. Norvell Chad Dawson]
NUMBER BEFORE WE MOVE TO NET CASE NUMBER.>> NO MA'AM. >> AS FAR AS CASE NUMBER 20-204.
WHAT WAS THE FIRST NOTICE THAT U SENT ON THAT CASE? WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE GREEN CARD?
IT RETURNED SIGN BY D NORVEL. >> WHAT WAS THE NEXT FORM OF NOTICE THAT WAS GIVEN AS TO CASE 20-046?
>> I DID ANOTHER INSPECTION AND FOUND THAT SOMEONE CUT THE PROPERTY BUT THEY NEVER LIFD UP THE TREES ON IT.
SO I SEPTEMBER OUT A LETTER -- O I SENT OUT THE ONE THAT WE T THE GREEN CARD SIGNED THAT THEY HAVE TO TRIM UP THE
TREES. >> THE LETTER SAID I'M SUMMARIZG THANK YOU FOR CUTTING THE GRASS BUT PLEASE ADDRESS ISE
WITH THE TREES, CORRECT? >> OKAY.
>> YES, MA'AM IT WAS. >> AND WAS THERE A LETTER SENT N
ASSOCIATED WITH THAT POSTIN? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> WAS THAT SENT BY REGULAR MAI? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> AND WAS IT RETURNED? >> NO MA'AM.
>> OKAY. WAS NOR ANY OTHER NOTICE GIVEN S
FAR AS CASE NUMBER 20-2046? >>> GNOME -- NO MA'AM.
>> SO I THINK THAT'S IT AS FAR S THAT ISSUE IS CONCERNED.
>> THERE WAS TWO OF THEM. BOTH CAME BACK UNDELIVERED.
>> THERE WAS A LETTER ON -- I'M JUST DESCRIBING THE LETTER S THE DATE ON SEPTEMBER 29TH.
I THINK YOU REFERRED TO IT AS A FRIENDLY LETTER THAT WAS SET TO A DIFFERENT ADDRESS. THAT WASN'T RECEIVED.
IT'S THE SAME ADDRESS THAT'S REGISTERED TO 20 4*6.
JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT. NOT SURE IF IT'S MATERIAL.
ON THE 2046 LETTER YOU MENTIONEA SEPTEMBER 8 LETTER.
I THINK SHE MISS SPOKE. >> YES, I SEE IT NOW.
>> THAT WAS SIGNED BY DEE NORVE. >> GOT YOU.
PY APOLOGIZE. THAT WAS ONE OF MY QUESTIONS IS WHICH DOCUMENT IS THE RETURN RECEIPT FOR?
>> IS IT NORMAL FOR IT TO BE DATE?
DOCUMENTS. >> IT DEPENDS ON THE POSTAL
SERVICE WORKER AT THAT TIME. >> THEY ARE THE ONES RESPONSIBLE FOR CARRYING OUT THOSE DUTIES.
I NOTICED IT WASN'T DATED. I COULDN'T BE SURE.
I THINK I UNDER STAND. THEY ARE SENT REGULAR MAIL AND T RETURNED UNBELIEVABLE TO THE CITY.
THEY WERE NEVER RETURNED AND SET REGULAR MAIL.
>> THE OTHER ONE WAS SENT CERTIFIED MAIL.
>> THE FIRST NOTICES ARE SENT REGULAR MAIL.
[01:15:03]
ALL FOLLOW UP SERVICES ARE SENT REGULAR MAIL.THAT'S NOT THE CASE. IN THE FIRST ONE THERE WAS AN ADDRESS SO WE RESENT IT CERTIFIED.
>> THE ONE WHERE WE MADE THE MISTAKE AND THE CORRECTED ONE. THEY WERE JUST SENT OUT TWICE.
>>> WE RESENT THE FIRST NOTICE AGAIN.
>> WE WERE CONCERNED THE PROPERY WAS MAINED AND SHOULD BE MAINTAINED NOW THE NEXT MAINTENANCE IS THIS WEEKEND.
ON SATURDAY WE WOULD ASK THE CITY'S LENIENCY AS YOU WILL SINCE WE WERE NOT IN THE LOP UNTIL AFTER THE BILLING WAS CONDUCTED. AND HOPEFULLY WE CAN ALL MOVE O.
>> SO SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THE ONY ISSUE LEFT IS AFTER THE AMOUNT. I THINK PULLING UP PROPERTY APPRAISER'S WEB-SITE NOW. THE SQUARE IN YELLOW IS 220 # WHICH IS THE SECOND CASE. AND THE ONE WHERE WE HAD THE POSTING NOTICE AND IN THE ORIGINAL NOTICE IS THE BIG L SHAPED ONE. THIS IS 2209 AND 2201 JUST FOR A VISUAL OF THE PROPERTY THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING.
YOU CAN SEE IT'S HEAVILY TREE. >> 2201 THE BIGGER.
>> THAT WILL HAVE THE DRIVEWAY N THESE PHOTOS. .
THESE ARE THE VENDORS PHOTOS FOR BEFORE AND AFTER.
>> THE BEFORE AND AFTER PHOTOS. >> SO SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THERE'A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF WORK THAT WAS DONE.
I THINK WE PORTRAYED THAT. I ALSO THINK THAT WE PROVIDED TE NOTICES THAT WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR BUT I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S A SG ANY CAN'T AMOUNT OF MONEY TT THE CITY IS REQUESTING. THE CITY WILL STAND BY THE BILLN THIS CASE BUT WE WILL RECOMMEND THAT AN EXTENDED AMOUNT OF TIME BE ALLOWED FR THE PAYMENT TO BE COMPLETED.
>> AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT THAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR EACH LOT R
[01:20:02]
IS THERE A COMBINED TOTAL? >> .
>> SO WE HAVE 3775 PLUS THE HUNDRED IS 3875.
WOULD YOU SAY THE WORK IS COMPARABLE IN THOSE TWO LOT?
ES. >> EARLIER I THINK YOU SAID NO MOWING ON ONE OF THEM. ONE OF THE CASES.
>>> THE ONE -- IT LOOKED LIKE SOMEONE DID MOW BUT THEY NER LIFT UP THE TREES OR ANYTHIG LIKE THAT.
WHEN WE CAME OUT THERE. I DID SEE SOMEONE MOW.
BY THE TIME WE WENT ON OUR WEED- WE WENT ON OUR BID.
THE GRASS WAS STARTING TO GROW P AGAIN.
>> SO THE WORK THAT THE LANDSCAE CONTRACTOR THAT THE CITY HIRED, WOULD YOU SAY IT'S COMPARABLE BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTY? ES.
THE REASON I ASKED MR. DAWSON THAT.
IT WAS UNCLEAR TO ME BUT THE RAS THAT THEY CHARGE ARE SIGNIFICANTLY -- BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES AND IF IT'S COMPARABLE WORK. . THE FAIR MARKET VALUE.
CAME OUT AND ACCORDING TO THE DOCUMENTS PRODUCED ON THE BD WORKSHEET. IT IS TO DO THE WORK PER SQUARE FOOT ON 2045. ASK THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MAYBE CONSIDER JUST STICKING WITH THE FLAT RATE BE APPLIED TO
BOTH OF THEM AS CONSIDERATI. >> I HAVEN'T READ ANY OTHER CAS.
>> SO, FOR CASE NUMBER 20-2046, YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS IN YOUR
HAND? >> YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THE COMING IN TO EVIDENCE UNDER THAT CASE NUMBER?
YOU WANT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THEM? >> SURE.
THE KHAL -- THE SMALLER ONE -- D THAT WILL ARGUE BACK THAT TE TREES ARE MUCH HEAVIER ON TE SMALLER RATHER THAN THE LARE OPEN SPACES. IT'S IN THE LIFTING OF THE TREE.
IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. >> NO OBJECTIONS.
[01:25:02]
WORKSHEET? YOU HAVE TAKEN EVIDENCE FROM BOH>> THAT WAS MY GREAT GRANDMOTHES HOME BEFORE IT BURNED DOWN.
>> THIS WILL BE ADMITTED. >> AND MR. NORVEL, YOU ARE REQUESTING THAT THE $7,250 E REDUCE?
I THINK IT'S FAIR. WE ARE NOT OBJECTING THAT THE PROPERTY WASN'T MAINTAINED PROPERLY.
CLEARLY IT WAS NOT. WE WOULD HAVE PREFERRED TO BE HE BEEN NOTIFIED AND WOULD HAVE RESPONDED AND COULD HAVE DOE IT BUT WE UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS.
WE ARE JUST ASKING FOR THE SPECL MAGISTRATE'S COMPASSION TO POSSIBLY CONSIDER SINCE $205 IS BILLED OUT AT 5 AND A HAF CENTS OF SQUARE FOOT OF REDUCED THAT A COMPARABLE RE BE APPLIED TO THE OTHER ONET WOULD CUT DOWN THE $375 TO $2046 ROUGHLY IN HALF WOULDE COMPARABLE RATE PER UNIT OR
>> ROUGHLY. >> SO SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, WHAT I HAVE BEEN PLAYING AROUND WIH IS TAKING THE AVERAGE IF THE ONE IS 12-CENTS AND ONE IS 5 THE AVERAGE COMES OUT TO 8..
BUT ON THE ONE BECAUSE IT WAS 5T BUMPS IT UP AND ON THE OTHER ONE IT BUMPS IT DOWN BUT IT DOES CHANGE IT A LITTLE BIT.
SO IT BRINGS IT DOWN TO $6,100. SO ITEM AS TKP-L -- $1,000 SAVIS TO USE THE AVERAGE COST ON BOTH PROPERTIES WHICH IS 8.5
CENTSS PER SQUARE FOOT. >> THAT BRINGS IT DOWN TO $6,10.
>> WE ARE AT YOUR MERCY SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
BUT I WOULD JUST QUESTION THE FS DID SEEM HIGH CONSIDERING I LIVE ON A PROPERTY A LITTLE BIT LARGER THAN THIS AND I Y $400 A MONTH. AND THAT INCLUDES TWO TIMES THE GUY COMES BY. WE ARE QUESTIONING IT.
WE THAT THE 5.5 IS STILL TOO HIGH.
IF THAT IS AN ACCEPTABLE FAIR MARKET RATE FOR THE WORK BEG PERFORMED THAT BE APPLIED IN BOTH CASES.
SINCE IT WAS COMPARABLE WORK AND DR. DAWSON AGREED TO IT.
>> REYES? YOU'RE ASKING THAT THE RATE BE 5 AS OPPOSED TO 8.5. 5.5 ON BOTH YES, MA'AM.
IF IT'S ACCEPTABLE ON ONE I DONT SEE THE ARGUMENT TO THE CONTRARY TO NOT APPLY IT TO THE OTHER.
>> AND STAFF IS OF THE OPINION THAT THE LARGER LOT RECEIVEA DISCOUNT BECAUSE HE WAS ALREADY OUT THERE DOING THE WORK AND HE DID IT ALL AS OE SO THE DISCOUNT WAS APPLIEDO THE LARGER PROPERTY. STAFF WOULD BE WILLING TO AGREEO
A $5,500 FOR BOTH. >> THE TOTAL?
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MR. MCCAIN. >> I'M SORRY.
>> MY MOTHER WAS A NORVEL BEFORE SHE MARRIED SO THAT'S WHY IM
HERE. >> DO I HAVE YOU DOWN AS BRETT
[01:30:01]
MCCAIN. I'M SORRY ABOUT THAT.>> NO PROBLEM. >> WHAT DID YOU SAY?
$5,100? >> $5,500. I WILL BRING THAT BAK
TO HIM. >> THERE'S AN AGREEMENT THAT THE
AMOUNT BE SET AT $5 Z 500. >> YES.
IT WOULD BE SOMEONE DO MY MATH R ME.
>> IT'S GOING TO BE ONE CHECK. >> FOR EACH ONE IT WOULD BE $2,0
EACH. >> BASED ON THE STIPULATION I WL REDUCE THIS TOTAL AMOUNT TO $5,500 WHICH WILL COVER BOTH LOTS. MUCH TIME DO YOU NEED TO PAY
THAT? >> I WILL HAVE TO CHECK MY MOTHER'S CONTROLLER FOR THE RANCH THAT PAYS THE BILLS BT I IMAGINE NEXT WEEK A CHECK COULD GO OUT.
>> 30 DAYS IS ENOUGH TIME? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO PAY. >> CLARIFICATION, WHERE DO WE SD
IT TO YOU? >> WOULD THAT BE ON THE INVOICE?
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENTS D YOUR PARTICIPATION.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ENJOY THE REST OF YOUR DAY.
>> YOU TOO. >> TELL YOUR MOM WE SAID HI.
>> THAT'S A FAMOUS NAME HERE IN NORVEL.
>> CHARLES NORVEL, JR. THE HOUSE TO YOUR LEFT ON THE SCREEN IS HIS OLD HOUSE AND JOHNNY NORVEL HIS FATHER WAS -- HE LIVED ON THIS PROPERTY HERE.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> YOU'RE WELCOME. .
THANK YOU, STAFF. >> WHEN WE GET THE E-MAIL TOGETHER. CAN YOU PLEASE E-MAIL THAT TO
BRETT? >> THANK YA'LL VERY MUCH.
[G. 20-1927 CE 2908 Rhode Island Ave William DeSantis (LF EST), Debra DeSantis (LF EST) Chad Dawson]
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 20-1927. 2908 RHODE ISLAND AVENUE.
WILLIAMS AND DEBRA DESANTIS. >> THIS IS A HEARING TO REDUCE E FINES ON THE PROPERTY. THAT IS NOW IN COMPLIANCE.
>> THE PROPERTY WAS CITED FOR 23 STORAGE AND 11 -- SORRY 125-315 SUBSECTION I, SUBJECTION 2, SUBJECTION B.
24-19, 20, 21 SUBSECTION D. AN OBJECT NOT FOR VEHICLES.
SECTION 24-19, 20, 21, SUBJECTIN 1, SUBJECTION 5 LOOSE OBJECT
OUTSIDE STORAGE. >> WE CLEARED UP 99% OF THE VIOLATIONS AND IT'S MY FAULT FOR NOT GETTING INSPECTOR DOORSON TO COME BY AND SEE THAT I WAS IN COMPLIANCE.
AS SOON AS THE LET HEAR THE WE WERE BEING FINED I CONTACTED MR. DOORSON AND HE MET ME AT THE PROPERTY AND IN FOUR HOS I GOT WHO EVER LEFT TO CLEAN UP. .
[01:35:03]
I AM HOPING THAT YOU WILL TAKE E WHOLE FINE WAY.>> I WANT TO BRING UP THE ADMINISTRATION COSTS JUST FR
THE RECORD. >> THERE WERE SOME HARD COSTS TT THE CITY INCURRED WHICH WERE RIGHT ABOUT HERE.
IT'S ROUGHLY $90 FOR THE HARD COSTS.
>> WE WILL TAKE THAT IN RECONSIDERATION.
THERE IS A PRECRITERIA THAT IS T ATTACHED.
>> . THEY WERE DONE ONE AFTER ANOTHE.
I WILL ADD THAT DID ADDRESS THAT IMMEDIATELY AFTER HE DID MET ME AT THE PROPERTY. IT IS A RENTAL.
I JUST WANT TO PUT THAT ON THERE ON HIS BEHALF HE DID TAKE CE OF IT AS SOON AS HE REALIZED WHAT WAS GOING ON.
>> ARE YOU ASKING FOR THE $90 HD COST?
>> WONDERFUL. >> BASED ON THE STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES I WILL REDUCE THE FINE TO $90.
HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU NEED TO PAY THAT?
>> I'LL PAY IT TODAY IF YOU'D LIKE.
>> WE ARE ALL DONE. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WE ARE NOT DONE. WE HAVE A COUPLE CALL IN.
>> I WAS GOING TO ASK ABOUT THE CALL IN.
[B. 21-1258 PK Jaycee Park Leal, Antonio M. Janey Vanderhorst]
>> OUR NEXT CASE WILL BE 21-1258 JAY SEE PARK.
I WILL CALL IT IN. . >> I'LL GO AHEAD AND SWEAR YOU
IN. >> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
>>> . >> DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT E TESTIMONY YOU WILL GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
>> -- YES. CAN YOU JUST BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YR INVOLVEMENT AND THEN WE WILL MOVE OVER TO THE OTHER ONE.
>> GOOD MORNING SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
>> GOOD MORNING. >> THE CITATION WAS IN MY NAME.
THEY WERE AT THE TIME. >> I WILL MOVE ON.
[01:40:08]
>> WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF FOE PIERCE.
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WHEN WAS THAT CASE INITIATED?
>> DID YOU TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT DAY?
>> WERE THE PHOTOGRAPHS PREVIOUY SENT TO MR. LEO?
>> YES. >> HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE ALLEGATION? ES.
>> YOU ARE VERY MUFFLED. >> IT IS.
I'M SORRY. >> DID YOU HEAR WHAT WE SAID?
>> I THINK IT'S YOUR TURN NOW TO STATE YOUR CASE.
>> I ARRIVED THERE AROUND 6:45 R TRIATHALON EVENT.
WHEN I GOT THERE THERE WERE BARRICADES SET UP BY POLICE
OFFICERS. >> WHEN I GOT THERE.
>> THE PARKING SPACES WERE FULL. AND 22 OTHER PARKED IN THE GRAS.
SO I HAD PARKED IN -T GRASS. >> I DIDN'T SEE THAT SIGN.
I DID SEE THAT SIGN FOR THE VEN. IT'S POSSIBLE THAT IT WAS OBSTRUCTED BECAUSE. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> DID YOU ASK IF THERE WERE ANY DESIGNATION PARKING SPACE? ES NO YES, MA'AM? I ASKED THE POLICE OFFICER THAT HAD THE PWA RA CADE -- BARRICADE UP?
>> YOU DON'T HAVE THE NAME OF TT POLICE OFFICER.
I DIDN'T THINK OF TAKING IT DOW. I'M SORRY.
>> I'M SORRY -- DID YOU SAY YOU WERE DIRECTED TO PARK THERE BAY POLICE OFFICER? -- BY A POLICE OFFICER?
>> YES, MA'AM. WHEN GOT IT THERE AT 6:40 THERE WERE ROADS BLOCKED OFF FOR E EVENT AND ONE OF THE PEACE OFFICERS AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE PARK I ASKED WHERE TO PK BECAUSE THERE WERE NO SPACES IN THE BUILDING AREA AND HE
POINTED TO PARK THERE. >> I'M NOT SURE WHO HE SPOKE
WITH. >> THEY WERE IN AND OUT OF THE
PARK. >> IF THE PARKING LOT WAS FULL T WOULD HAVE DIRECTED HIM TO PARKING ON THE STREET.
>> I AM NOT SURE WHO YOU SPOKE WITH.
IF THE PARKING LOT WAS FULL THE POLICE OFFICER WOULD HAVE DIRECTED YOU TO PARK ON SOUH OCEAN DRIVE.
>> ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE EVT OF VOLUNTEERS OR COORDINATORS? ?
[01:45:04]
>> I DON'T THINK I DID. >> THOSE ARE THE EVENT
COORDINATORS VOLUNTEERS. >> OKAY.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> DID YOU SEE HIM TELLING HIM E
COULDN'T PARK IN THAT AREA? >> THERE WERE SIGNS THERE.
YOU WOULDN'T PARK IN THIS AREA? >> NO MA'AM.
THERE ARE NO SIGNS. . THERE WERE EVENT SIGNS THERE.
>> ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> . >> WERE OTHER CARS ISSUED
CITATIONS THAT MORNING? >> THANK YOU.
ANY THING FURTHER? >> I WILL FINE YOU $50 FOR THE IMPROPER PARKING. HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU NEED TO PAY
>> I FIND THAT YOU ARE IN VIOLATION FOR IMPROPER PARKING. PARKING OF THE RIGHT WAY OF JAYE PARK. I WILL NOT FINE THE ADMINISTRATE COSTS BECAUSE YOU WERE THERE FOR THE EVENT BUT HOW MUCH
TIME DO YOU NEED TO PAY THA? >>>
>> I WILL GIVE YOU TWO WEEKS TO PATE.
THANK YOU. >> I WILL CALL HIM IN AS WELL.
[C. 21-2009 PK Avenue D Kyle Shepkosky Michael Rabenecker]
>> HI, KYLE. WE ARE ABOUT TO CALL YOUR CASE R THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARG THIS MORNING.
>> OKAY. I WILL SWEAR YOU IN AND RAISE YR RIGHT HAND FOR THE RECORD. DO YOU SWEAR THE TESTIMONY YOU'E ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
>> YES, MA'AM. IS THAT PARKING CITATION CASE?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WAS THE CITATION ISSUED WITHN THE CITY LIMITS OF FORT PIERCE?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WHAT LOCATION.
AVENUE LIEU D AND NORTH RIVER DRIVE.
>> WHAT WAS THE DATE THE CITATIN WAS ISSUED?
>> AUGUST 1ST, 2021. >> WHAT IS THE NATION OF THE VIOLATION YOU OBSERVE? ED.
>> OKAY. AND HOW WAS THE VEHICLE IN
VIOLATION? >>> THE VEHICLE HAD A TRAILER ATTACHED TO IT. SO IT WAS IN VIOLATION BECAUSE O TRAILERS ARE ALLOWED TO BE PARKED IN THAT PARKING AREA?
DID THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>>> DID THEY ARE PRY TKWROR THIS MORNING'S HEARING.
>> SO THIS TIME WE WOULD LEAVE E PHOTOS IN CITY'S 1 COMPOSIT.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. >> ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY ABOT
THE PHOTOS? >> NO MA'AM. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO MA'AM. >> HOW YOU RESPOND TO THIS?
[01:50:04]
>> I WENT TO THE BOAT RAMP RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET.
I PUT MY BOAT IN. UPON ARRIVAL THERE THERE WERE A FEW SPOTS AVAILABLE PUTTINGY BOAT IN AND WHEN I WAS GOING TO FIND A PARKING SPOT THERE WAS NONE.
THERE WAS ONE BUT THERE WAS A TRAILER PARKED HALF WAY BETWEEN TWO SPOTS SO I DIDNT WANT TO TRY TO PARK THERE.
>> SO UPON LOOKING THERE WAS NO OTHER SPOT.
THERE WERE CARS PARKED IN THE BT PARKING.
SO I WENT ACROSS THE STREET WHEE I SAW A FEW OTHER TRAILERS PARKED IN THAT PARKING LOT. SO PARKED OVER THERE.
AND COMING BACK I RECEIVED THIS $50 SIGN AND THERE WAS STILL CARS PARKED IN THE BOAT TRAILER PARKING WITH NO CITATIONS ON THEM. SO I WAS WONDERING IF THERE'S THING WE CAN DO ABOUT THAT. I DON'T KNOW IF I SHOULD HAVE PT MY BOAT BACK ON THE TRAILER AND WENT SOMEWHERE ELSE OR WHAT I SHOULD HAVE DONE IN THAT SITUATION.
I SAW PARKING FURTHER AWAY AND N AN EMPTY FIELD WOULD BE SU
SUFFICIENT BUT I GUESS NOT. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE?
>> YES. >> WHAT WAS JUST STATED IS CORRECT. AT THE TIME, THE PARKING AREA WS NOT PROPERLY POSTED PROHIBITING THE CARS FROM PARKING IN THE BOAT TRAILERS BOX.
SO WE WERE UNABLE TO ADDRESS THE CARS BECAUSE IT WAS NOT PROPERLY POSTED. THAT MATTER WAS BROUGHT UP TO TE CITY MANAGER WHO INSTRUCTED PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE THE CORRECTIONS. SINCE THAT TIME THE PROPER POSTG HAS BEEN DONE AND THE CENTER PARKING SPOTS WHICH WERE CAR PARKING ONLY HAVE BEEN REDESIGNED WITH A DASH LOT O THE CARS OR BOATS TO DO BOTH TYPE OF PARKING.
SO SINCE THIS CITATION WAS ISSU, CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO ADDRESS ISSUES THAT WERE JUT RAISED BY THE RESPONDENT.
SHE CORRECT. THE CARS WERE IN THE BOAT TRAILR PARK SPOT BUT WE COULD NOT ADDRESS IT LEGALLY.
ISSUE IS NOTED ON THE DAY THAT E WAS CITED.
WHAT WAS AVAILABLE AT THAT TIME. >> AT THAT TIME THERE WERE NO SRAEU VIOLATIONS IN THE PARKING LOT FOR THE CARS.
AND SO UNFORTUNATELY, HE HAD THE QUESTION SHOULD I READ ON MY BOAT. IT'S HARD ANSWER TO SAY.
>> DID YOUR HEAR THAT? >> THERE WERE NO CARS PARKED IN THE TRAILER PARKING AT THE TIME OF MY CITATION?
>> NO, SIR. WE ARE NOT SAYING THAT.
WE WERE SAYING AT THAT TIME WE WERE UNABLE TO ENFORCE IT AGAINST THE CARS PARKED IN E BOAT TRAILER.
SO, AS FAR AS ME PARKING IN AN EMPTY FIELD, I FEEL LIKE THT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED SIE THERE WAS NO PARKING AVAILA.
>> SO SPECIAL MAGISTRATE JUST TO BE CLEAR THERE WAS SIGN POSD IN THE AREA WHERE THE RESPONDENT PARK IS AT.
I HAVE A STATEMENT ON THAT AS WELL.
ARE YOU ABLE TO PULL UP THE SATELLITE VIEW?USC-JJSC1029
[01:55:21]
P>> IT IS SPLIT. NOBODY PARKED IN THAT PARKING LOT. I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT SIDE.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> FROM MY SIDE?
>> YES. >> I WANT TO SAY ONE THING TO POSSIBLY CONSIDER USING THIS COMMUNITY A LOT I LIKE TO GO TO THE BOAT RAMPS AND WHAT NOT TIMING I CANNOT PARK ANYWHERE, END UP HAVING TO GO TO OTHER COUNTIES YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN ECONOMIC IMPACTS ON FORT PIERCE BECAUSE I AM NOT GOING TO BE GOING THERE ANYMORE I SPEND HUNDREDS AT GAS STATIONS AND WHATNOT AND I WANT TO USE FORT PIERCE BOAT RAMPS BUT IF THERE IS NOWHERE TO PARK I AM GOING TO START USING OTHER FACILITIES. SHOULD HAVE ECONOMIC IMPACT.
TAKING THE BOAT OUT COSTS A LOT OF MONEY EACH TIME THAT IS ALL
I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THAT. >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU ANYTHING ELSE? BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS.
THE PARKING VIOLATION OF THE PARKING LOT.
I WOULD FIND YOU $50. $10 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE YOU HAVE
10 DAYS TO PAY THAT. >> EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS A MISTAKE ON YOUR GUISES PART IN THE BOAT TRAILER PARKING AND I AM GETTING FIND BECAUSE OF THAT.
>> I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS NO MISUNDERSTANDING.
>> I BELIEVE CHAD. >> LEFT THE BUILDING.
[A. 21-1330 PK 409 Cedar Place Cephus W Cruickshank Chad Dawson]
>> ANYONE KNOW WHERE CHAD WENT? >> NEXT CASE 21 Ã13 3409 CEDAR
>> YES, MA'AM. NUMBER 21 Ã1330 CEDAR PLACE.
THE PROPERTY THE CASE STARTED JUNE 21 OF 2021.HE PROPERTY CITED, 24 Ã21 SUBSECTION 1, SUBSECTION 5. SECTION 24 Ã SECTION 24 Ã1924 Ã20. NEW SENTENCE AS AN OBJECT.
REQUESTS SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR GIVEN 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY.
>> THANK YOU. >> DO THE ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? WE MOVE THE PHOTOS IN.
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> JUST TO PUT ON RECORD YOUR HONOR, THE COMPLAINT CAME IN FROM ACTUALLY A TENANT THAT LIVES THERE COMPLAINING ON THE OWNER THROWING A LOT OF DEBRIS BEHIND HER UNIT.
I TOLD HER WE HAVE HISTORY WITH THIS OWNER, WE HAVE QUITE A FEW PROPERTIES HE DOESN'T DO ANYTHING WITH BUT I WILL TAKE
[02:00:07]
IT TO COURT TODAY I AM NOT HEARD ANYTHING BACK FROM HIM IN THE PROCESS. FROM MONDAY STILL HAS SOMEDEGREE STILL OUT THERE. >> OKAY ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> IS NOT HERE, REPRESENTATIVE ON HIS BEHALF? BEING ON I WILL FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS, RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR CEDAR PLACE. E HAS 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED HE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
>> THAT IS IT. >> THE PARTIES WHO WERE NOT
HEAR HOW WERE THEY NOTIFIED? >> NOTICE OF HEARING SENT TO THE VIOLATOR CERTIFIED MAIL. IT IS PLACED IN THE FILE IF THE GREEN CARD IS UNCLAIMED AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING WITH THE NOTICE OF HEARING SENT TO THE VIOLATOR REGULAR U.S. MAIL.
A NOTICE OF HEARING POSTED AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION.
IT'S THE GREEN CARD IS NOT RETURNED, BEFORE THE HEARING THE POSTING IS COMPLETED IN THE SAME MANNER THAT THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED. HANDLED IN THE SAME MANNER.
IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNCLAIMED OR NOT RETURNED WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE HEARING A NOTICE IS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.