[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:10]
>> GOOD MORNING I'M FRAN AND I WILL RESIDE OVER THIS MORNING HEARING. YOU ARE HERE BECAUSE YOUR HEARD YOUR PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY CODE.
YOU WERE GIVEN A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME TO CORRECT IT AND YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO AND FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT WISH TO BE HEARD I WILL CALL YOU SHORTLY IN THE MEANTIME IF YOU DON'T MIND PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC, FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
>> OKAY. MADAM CLERK? IF EVERYBODY COULD STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND TO BE SWORN IN? DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU PROVIDE TODAY WILL BE THE TRUTH?
THANK YOU. >> TWO THINGS OF NOTE.
I APOLOGIZE BEING LATE. I DIDN'T REALIZE IT WAS AFTER 9:00 UNTIL ELIZABETH CALLED ME AND THIS PROCEEDING IS BEING TELEVISED ON THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE NETWORK SO BE MINDFUL OF THAT WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM.
[A. 21-425 620 S 11th Street Marseille, Wis & Myrtha Cristobal Bossano]
WHEN YOU ARE READY? >> OUR FIRST CASE TODAY IS 5A 21-425. 620 SOUTH 11TH STREET.
WIS AND MYRTHA MARSEILLE ARE THE OWN
THAT'S FINE. WHEN YOU ARE READY MR. B.U.
>> GOOD MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING.
>> TIME BUILDING INSPECTOR, CRIS BOSSANO.
THE CASE IS NUMBER 21-425, 620 SOUTH 11TH STREET.
THE CASE INITIATED FEBRUARY 18TH OF 2021.
THE OWNER IS WIS AND MYRTHA MARSEILLE.
ADDRESS IS LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA 3463.
THE VIOLATION IS 105.1, 2017 PERMIT REQUIRED.
CORRECTIVE TAX TO TURN THE PERMIT FOR THE SOLUTION.
>> THE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THEM IN VIOLATION TO GIVE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND RESOLVE THE VIOLATIONS.
CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDINANCE, AND IF THEY DON'T ACQUIRE A PERMIT THEY'LL BE ASSESSED A FINE.
I HAVE A COMPLAINT THEY DID A PEAR CONDITION WITH NO PERMIT.
I SHOW READY TO DO ON THE PROPERTY.
AND HERE TOGETHER FOR PERMITS FOR THE VIOLATION AND HE SAY HE'S WORKING WITH THE CONTRACTOR TO GET A PERMIT.
>> OKAY. >> I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND PUT THE PHOTOS INTO EVIDENCE AND IT SOUNDS LIKE IT MIGHT BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE RESPONDENT TO ADDRESS YOU.
>> HAVE YOU SEEN THE PICTURES MR. MARSELLE?
HAVE YOU SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> I JUST SAW THEM RIGHT NOW.
>> LET HIM LOOK AT THEM. >> I APOLOGIZE.
I THOUGHT HE HAD SEEN THOSE. >> YEAH, THE REASON IS I DIDN'T KNOW IF I HAD TO PUT A PERMIT FOR THE AC BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW THE COURT HERE BECAUSE I DON'T LIVE HERE, BUT LIKE UP THERE, IF I CAN CHANGE OUT THE AC IF YOU DO IT ON YOUR OWN.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO PULL A PERMIT AN THAT'S WHY I DID IT THAT WAY. SO I CAN'T TO CONTACT MY CONTRACTOR TO TRY TO GET A PERMIT.
I'M GOING TO TRY THE BEST I CAN TO GET A PERMIT DONE.
>> OKAY. >> HELP ME OUT A MINUTE.
IS IT STANDARD THAT PERMITS ARE REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF
[00:05:03]
FLORIDA FOR AC? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> DID YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND ACCEPT THE PHOTOGRAPHS?
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED. >> THANK YOU, SIR.
>> ALRIGHT. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTED AT 211 ORANGE AVENUE, NO, THAT'S THE WRONG. AT 620 SOUTH 11TH STREET AND THAT WIS AND MYRTHA MARSEILLE ARE THE PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I WILL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT, COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNDERSTAND THE I'LL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED.
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT.
>> THANK YOU. >> YOU'RE WELCOME.
NEXT CASE? >> NEXT CASE IS 5I, THIS IS A CONTINUED CASE, BY THE WAY FROM LAST MONTH.
IT'S 21-1139. 1117 PASEO AVENUE.
HUMBERTO RAYES AND HILDA OCHOA ARE THE OWNERS.
>> WE HAVE AN INTERPRETER PRESENT FOR THIS CASE.
>> YES, THANK YOU. >> I HAVE TO SWEAR IN THE INTERPRETER IF YOU COULD SWEAR IN PLEASE? PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT NAME AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
>> CAESAR FLOREZ. >> DO YOU SWEAR YOU WILL ACCURATELY TRANSLATE ENGLISH TO SPANISH AND SPANISH TO ENGLISH?
GOOD MORNING. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE I DON'T MEAN TO INTERRUPT BUT IT MIGHT GO FASTER IF I CAN RECOMMEND THAT HE UPDATE YOU ON THIS CASE SINCE IT WAS PRESENTED ALREADY
>> I BELIEVE WE WERE WAITING ON A SURVEY.
WE BELIEVE THAT HE NEEDS MORE TIME.
HE'S ASKING FOR MORE TIME TO GET THE SURVEY OUT.
>> BASED ON THE CURRENT STATE OF AFFAIRS WITH REGARDS TO THE BUILDING INDUSTRY, IS 30 DAYS GOING TO BE ENOUGH?
>> I BELIEVE HE WAS ASKING FOR 45 DAYS?
>> IT'S BECAUSE IT TAKES 45 DAYS ONLY FOR TO GO OUT AND SEE.
RECTIFY IT SO HE CAN COME AND DO EVERYTHING ELSE.
AND IN ADDITION, THEY CHARGE $800.
AND I HAVE TO OBTAIN THAT MONEY. >> OKAY.
>> AND YOU'RE REQUESTING 60 DAYS INSTEAD OF 45?
>> CI IT'S BETTER TIMING. >> I DO KNOW THAT THERE ARE BACKLOGS WITH MANY OF THE PEOPLE WORKING IN THAT INDUSTRY.
THEN I'LL CONTINUE THIS FOR IT. >> I DO KNOW THAT THERE ARE BACKLOGS WITH MANY OF THE PEOPLE WORKING IN THAT INDUSTRY.
THEN I'LL CONTINUE THIS FORIT'S. >> I DO KNOW THAT THERE ARE BACKLOGS WITH MANY OF THE PEOPLE WORKING IN THAT INDUSTRY.
TEN I'LL CONTINUE THIS FOR IT'S. >> I DO KNOW THAT THERE ARE BACKLOGS WITH MANY OF THE PEOPLE WORKING N THAT INDUSTRY.
THEN I'LL CONTINUE THIS FORIT'S. >> I DO KNOW THAT THERE ARE BACKLOGS WITH MANY OF THE PEOPLE WORKING IN THAT INDUSTRY.
THEN I'LL CONTINUE THIS FOR MY SECOND DOCKET.
WHICH ABOUT 60 DAYS. >> JANUARY.
[B. 21-696 2730 S US Hwy 1 Comunidade Das Nacoes Inc Logan Winn]
THE NEXT CASE IS 5B, CASE 21-696, 2730 SOUTH US HIGHWAY 1.
COMMUNIDADE DAS NACOES INC. IS THE OWNER.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THERE IS A TRANSLATOR FOR THIS CASE, AS
[00:10:03]
>> GOOD MORNING. >> OKAY IF YOU ARE GOING TO INTERPRET YOU HAVE TO SWEAR IN AS AN INTERPRETER.
SO PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RE RECORD? DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL ACCURATELY TRANSLATE THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE INTO PORTUGUESE AND PORTUGUESE LANGUAGE INTO THE
>> STATE YOUR NAME PLEASE, INTERPRETER?
WHAT'S YOUR NAME? >> LOUI'S FILLY PAY.
>> IF YOU ARE GOING TO INTERPRET YOU HAVE TO QUOTE ME WORD FOR WORD TO HIM, OKAY? WHAT I JUST SAID YOU HAVE TOO TELL HIM IN PORTUGUESE. YOU WANT ME TO REPEAT IT?
YOU HAVE TO TRANSLATE WORD FOR WORD.
FIRST PERSON IF HE SAYS I WENT TO THE STORE THEN YOU SAY I WENT TO THE STORE. YOU DON'T SAY HE SAID, YOU TRANSLATE AS IF HE'S COME TO SPEAK TO US, OKAY?
>> ALRIGHT. >> MR. LOGAN WINN YOU MAY PROCEED. GOOD MORNING.
>> CASE NUMBERS 21-696, ADDRESS OF 2730 SOUTH US HIGHWAY 1.
CASE WAS INITIATED MARCH 29TH, 2021.
>> HOLD ON AND GIVE HIM TIME TO INTERPRET.
THE OWNER IS COMMUNIDADE DAS NACOES INC.
>> YOU HAVE TO TRANSLATE. >> THE ADDRESS IS 2730 SOUTH US HIGHWAY 1, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA. THE VIOLATION IS FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 105.1. PERMIT REQUIRED.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WERE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR REMOVING
EXTERIOR FACADE. >> I DO HAVE PICTURES OF THE FACADE THAT THEY REMOVED WITHOUT A PERMIT.
>> YOU HAVE TO INTERPRET AND TELL HIM EVERYTHING HE SAYS.
>> YES. >> I'M ASKING HIM THE QUESTION.
HE HAS TO ANSWER. >> YOU CAN CONTINUE MR. LOGAN
WINN, JUST REMEMBER HE'S TRYING. >> ANYTHING ELSE?
WHAT'S HIS RESPONSE? >> THERE WAS SOME THINGS LEFT HERE AND OUR ROOFING WAS PRESENTING SOME PROBLEMS, SOME ISS ISSUES.
AND WE ARE WORKING NOW TOGETHER WITH OUR INSURANCE TO GET THE PROBLEM SOLVED. AND WITH THIS RAIN, THE RIGHT POLES THEY FALL OFF. AND WITH THAT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE POLLS ARE NOT DANGEROUS FOR ANYONE, WE DECIDED TO FINISH UP REMOVING THEM. S ARE NOT DANGEROUS FOR ANYONE, WE DECIDED TO FINISH UP REMOVIN THEM.ES ARE NOT DANGERO ANYONE, WE DECIDED TO FINISH UP REMOVING THEM.
>> AND WITH THOSE WE ARE TRYING TO GET THE PERMIT WITH OUR INSURANCE TO START THE JOB ON THE ROOFING.
IT IS A PROCESS THAT'S TAKING A LITTLE BIT A LONGER BUT IT IS
COMING UP. >> HOW MUCH A LONGER DO YOU
THINK IT WILL TAKE? >> I HOPING IT GOES BETWEEN 30
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE? AT THIS TIME I WANT TO JUST ASK MR. LOGAN WINN IF HE TOOK THE PHOTOGRAPHS AND IF THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT HE SAW?
[00:15:02]
>> YES I DID AND THEY DO. >> I'LL WAIT FOR THAT TO BE
I TOOK THE PICTURES. THAT REFLECTED WHAT I'D SEEN.
>> YES, THERE ARE THE PICTURES. >> AT THIS TIME I'D LIKE TO JUST HAVE THEM ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE.
>> THEY'LL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?
THAT'S ALL. ALRIGHT. EVERYTHING I SAY YOU HAVE TO INTERPRET IT. ALRIGHT.
BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED.
I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS. THIS IS AT 2730 SOUTH US HIGHWAY THAT COMMUNIDADE DAS NACOES INC. IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOL VIOLATION.
>> CAN YOU REPEAT THE LAST PART. >> IS HIS COMPUTER ON?
>> HE'S READING RECOMMENDATION PART.
>> THE RECOMMENDATION PART? THE VIOLATION EXISTS.
YOU HAVE TO TELL ME WHAT HE'S SAYING TOO.
>> HE'S JUST READING THIS AND REPEATING IT TO PORTUGUESE FOR
HIM. >> FOR RECORD KEEPING PURPOSES HERE. I DON'T SPEAK PORTUGUESE.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND SOME ENGLISH, SIR?
>> YES, HE UNDERSTANDS SOME. YEAH, HE TOLD ME THAT HE JUST
BRING ME. >> NOW DON'T SAY NOW HE TOLD ME,
WHAT DID HE SAY? >> HE SAID HE BROUGHT ME TO HAVE MORE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
>> OKAY. I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU HELPING US OUT HERE, TELL THAT TO HIM. TELL ME WHAT HE SAID?
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, NO.
THAT'S THE FINAL DECISION. >> MR. LOGAN WINN? YOUR RECOMMENDATION IS 60 DAYS FOR HIM TO OBTAIN A PERMIT?
>> I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 2730 SOUTH US HIGHWAY 1. YOU HAVE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PER PERMIT.
>> OKAY. >> OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS.
UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED.
COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDI CONDITIONS. AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDER. THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED.THE ORDER NOT T OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED.
>> THANK YOU. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
TO APPEAL IF HE DOESN'T HIKE MY DECISION HE CAN APPEAL IT C.
>> ALRIGHT. >> AND I SUGGEST YOU GET WITH BUILDING AND WITH MR. LOGAN WINN.
>> SORRY? >> I SUGGEST YOU GET WITH MR. LOGAN WINN IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
>> NO, NO. WE ARE ALREADY PROVIDING ALL THE INFORMATION THAT YOUR MAGISTRATE ASKS.
[00:20:01]
[H. 21-1136 1218 Orange Avenue Vaandering, Edward Edward Smith]
>> THE NEXT CASE IS 5H, CASE 21-1136, 1218 ORANGE AVENUE,
EDWARD VAANDERING IS THE OWNER. >> MORNING.
>> MORNING. >> I GUESS WHAT I'D LIKE TO SAY
IS - >> SIR, HOLD ON UNTIL THE CITY PRESENTS THEIR CASE AND THEN YOU'LL HAVE TIME TO RESPOND.
>> MORNING. WE HAVE CASE NUMBER 21-1136.
1218 ORANGE AVENUE, EDWARD VAANDERING IS THE OWNER.
ADDRESS IS 1108 ANGLE ROAD FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA, 34947.
VIOLATIONS ARE IPMC 304 POINT 10, STAIRWAY, DECKS AND PORCHES AND BALCONIES AND 304.4. STRUCTURAL.
IPMC 304.1.1 POINT 12, 2021. UNSAFE CONDITIONS, STAIRS AND DECKS AND PORCHES. IPMC 304.1 POINT 8, 2021, UNSAFE CONDITION, ROOF. IPMC 2021 EXTERIOR WALLS AND IP M603.43, 2021 ELECTRICAL HAZARDS.
IPMC 302.5, 2001 RODENT. 304 POINT 15 EXTERIOR DOORS.
THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS.
REPAIR AND REPLACE ROTTEN AND BAD STAIRS AND STINGERS AND SUPPORT MEMBERS AND REPAIR ROOF COMPONENTS THAT HAVE MET RAIN.
MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO EXPOSED ELECTRICAL WIRES TO PROVIDE PROTECTIVE COVER FOR OPEN ELECTRICAL BOXES.
REPLACE WEATHER-PROOF COVERS ON THE EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL PANEL.
REPAIR HOLES IN EXTERIOR WALL. STREET PROPERTY FOR INFESTATION OF RODENTS AND REPAIR OR REPLACE BARS ON WINDOWS THAT ARE NOT UNLOCKABLE FROM THE INSIDE IF REPLACED BARS MUST BE UNLOCKABLE FROM THE KEY OR A TOOL. THE CITY REQUESTED AND CAN EXISTS AND IS CAN OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL INSPECTIONS FOR 180 DAYS. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER MEMBER CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
I HAVE PICTURES. >> REACH OUT TO THE RESPONDENT.
>> WE HAD A MEETING AND HE DID HAVE THESE PICTURES.
YOU WANT TO SEE THEM AGAIN? >> I HAVE THE PICTURES.
>> DO THESE ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW.
THEY RUN THEM INTO ONE COMPOSITE.
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
THIS CASE WAS INITIALLY INITIATED BY PREVIOUS INSPECTOR AND THEN I MET WITH MR. VAANDERING AT THE PROPERTY AND DID AREA INSPECTION TO SEE IF ANY OF THE VIOLATIONS HAVE BEEN CURED BUT I GUESS WE HAD A MEETING TO GET AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT WAS REQUIRED BY US C. OKAY.
[00:25:03]
I AM HERE WITH TWO CASES AND I HAD A PROBLEM.THE PROBLEM IS IT WAS HEAVY AND DIFFICULT THIS YEAR WITH EVICTIONS, PROBLEMS WITH PEOPLE AND AFTER EVERY EVICTIONS COMES A CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE. IT IS A WAY OF THE LIFE.
HOWEVER THERE I AM WITH THE CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES AND AT EXACTLY THE SAME TIME A REALTOR COMES UP TO ME AND I'M 78.
I'D LIKE TO RETIRE, SO A REALTOR COMES UP TO ME AND SAYS I WANT TO BUY FIVE OF YOUR HOUSES. OKAY.
HE GAVE ME A RIDICULOUSLY LOW PRICE BUT I ACCEPTED.
I ADVISED THE REALTOR AT THAT TIME, REALTOR I HAVE TWO CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES ON TWO HOUSES. NO PROBLEM SAYS THE REALTOR.
I DIDN'T BELIEVE HIM. HE SAID NO PROBLEM.
WE BUY THEM AS IS AND WE'LL LOOK AT THE CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES.
I DIDN'T REALLY BELIEVE THEM BUT I CARRIED ON WITH THE SALE OF THE FIVE HOUSES. WHICH TOOK A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF TIME. ONE DAY BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THE SALE OF THE FIVE HOUSES, HE ADVISED ME THAT I ONLY WANT TWO OF THE HOUSES. I DON'T WANT FIVE.
OH. I SAID, WELL THE DEAL IS FOR FIVE. TO NOT STRETCH THIS A LONGER, HE SAYS WELL IF YOU DON'T SELL ME TWO, I'M GOING TO SUE YOU FOR BREACH OF CONTRACTOR. I SAID, WELL, SIR, I'M GOING TO SUE YOU FOR BREACH OF CONTRACTOR BECAUSE YOU WON'T PROMISE TO BUY
FIVE AND NOT TWO. >> THE TWO WERE THE TWO CASES I'M HERE FOR TODAY. ANYWAY'S I WON THE LAWSUIT AND I HAVE FIVE HOUSES AND I HAVE THESE HOUSES.
I HAVE A LOT OF WORK DONE ON THEM BUT I'M NOT DONE BECAUSE OF WHAT THE REALTOR TOLD ME. WHAT I'M ASKING FOR IS YOUR HELP. I PLAN TO GET THESE ITEMS CORRECTED AND I HAVE TWO CASES HERE.
I WOULD LIKE 90 TODAYS EXTENSION TO CORRECT THEM ON BOTH CASES AND I'LL HAVE THEM DONE. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I'VE EVER BEEN HERE IN THIS TOWN. 22 YEARS I'VE NEVER MET ANY OF YOU. THIS GIRL HERE DOES A FANTASTIC
JOB, BY THE WAY. >> ELIZABETH DOES DO A FANTASTIC
JOB. >> I'D LIKE JUST 90 DAYS AND JUST DO IT. I KNOW I HAVE TO DO IT AND I DIDN'T OWN THEM FOR ALL THAT TIME.
EVERY OTHER PROBLEM I'VE HAD IN THE LAST 22 YEARS SHE'LL VERIFY I DID IT. DONE.
BECAUSE OF THE EVICTION HIGH RATE RIGHT NOW THERE'S NOT A LOT OF GOOD TENANTS AROUND SO YOU TAKE CHANCES AND WHEN THEY DON'T PAY YOU HAVE TO EVICT. WHEN YOU EVICT THEY WANT FREE ROOM AND BOARD AND THEY CALL UP CODE ENFORCEMENT SO IT BEEN GOING FOR 40 DAYS. I'M ASKING FOR 90 DAYS AND I'LL
HAVE THEM CORRECTED. >> CAN YOU PULL PERMITS?
>> LET ME BE VERY TRUTHFUL WITH YOU.
WHEN THEY TOLD ME THESE HOUSES WERE SOLD AND I SAID, OKAY, TWO OF THEM HAVE CODE VIOLATIONS ON THEM AND THEY SAID, WELL DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE CODE VIOLATIONS BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO BUY THEM AS IS. I DIDN'T BELIEVE THAT AND EVERY TIME I WENT TO MY LOCAL PLUMBER OR PERSON WHOEVER I SAID, HEY, CAN YOU RECOMMEND A GOOD GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR ME?
>> YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, SURE. I TOOK THE NAME AND I TOOK THE NUMBER. SIX OF THEM TO BE EXACT AND I CALLED UP ALL SIX AND SAID CAN YOU COME DOWNED A GIVE ME AN ESTIMATE. I FIGURED IF THIS DEAL DIDN'T GO THROUGH I WOULD NEED THEM. TO THIS DAY NONE OF THEM HAVE EVEN RETURNED A CALL YET. SO I DON'T KNOW.
I GUESS I'LL HAVE TO GO INTO GOOGLE OR SOMEWHERE AND FIND SOMEONE TO HELP ME PULL THESE PERMITS.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> I WILL SAY IN REFERENCE TO SOME OF THE WORK ONE OF MY EVICTIONS WAS BECAUSE THEY COMPLAINED ABOUT SOME BUGS IN THE HOUSE AND HUG AND THE BUG COMPANY COULDN'T AND SHE WANTED IT NOW.
I PAID $1700 TO HAVE THEM COME AND IN TREAT THE PLACE AND
[00:30:03]
UNFORTUNATELY THE DAY THAT THEY WERE GOING TO TERMITE THE PLACE WAS HER EXIT DATE, SO I HAD TO CANCEL THE EXIT DATE OR THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN DONE TOO. I ALSO WILL SAY THAT LADY, SOMETIMES THESE PEOPLE COME ALONG WITH PROBLEMS AND I RESPECT THE INSPECTOR AND THE INSPECTOR SAYS I CAN'T LIVE IN ONE OF THE ROOMS BECAUSE THE ROOF LEAKS.OKAY. I DID RENT IT TO SOMEBODY ELSE AND I TOLD THEM. I'M TOLD THE ROOF LEAKS HERE IN THIS BEDROOM. LET ME KNOW.
THEY'VE BEEN IN THERE NOW FOR THREE MONTHS AND THERE'S NO LE LEAK.
SO YOU KNOW. YOU GUYS ARE NOT FORGOTTEN.
I'M GOING TO FULFILL MY RESPONSIBILITY LIKE I ALWAYS HAVE DONE IN 22 YEARS AND I WOULD LIKE 90 DAYS TO CORRECT THESE SITUATIONS ON TWO HOUSES. HE ONLY MENTIONED ONE HOUSE.
>> WELL THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE CASES AND WE DEAL WITH ONE AT A
TIME. >> ANYWAY THIS ONE HERE.
YEAH - WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER CASE.
I'M TALKING 90 DAYS ON BOTH CASES WHICH IS 45 DAYS PER CASE.
THERE'S NOTHING IN HERE THAT'S REALLY DRASTIC, OKAY? THE ONLY THING THAT'S DRASTIC IS I HAVE A SET OF STAIRS THAT NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. AND I CAN'T FIND ANYBODY BUT I'M GOING TO HAVE TO FIND SOMEBODY BUT THAT'S THE REASON IT'S NOT DONE IS BECAUSE THE HOUSES WERE SOLD A DAY BEFORE THE CLOSING.
SO I HAVE ALL FIVE OF THEM STILL.
>> MR. SMITH, HOW DID THIS COMPLAINT COME BEFORE CODE AND
BUILDING? >> IT INITIALLY CAME AS A COMPLAINT TO PREVIOUS INSPECTOR AND THEN I WAS SENT OVER TO DO THE INSPECTION. MR. VAANDERING WANTED A MEETING TO SEE, YOU KNOW, WHAT WERE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WERE LISTED ON THE THING. WHAT IT MEANT SO WE WENT OVER
THE WHOLE LIST. >> NO, WE DIDN'T.
>> WE WALKED THROUGH THE WHOLE TOP OF THE PROPERTY.
I WALKED THROUGH THE DOWNSTAIRS TOO BUT I DON'T THINK IT WAS DOWNSTAIRS. IT WAS ALL UPSTAIRS.
I LOOKED AROUND THE PROPERTY AND WENT THROUGH WHAT HE ASKED ME AS FAR AS WHAT HE DIDN'T UNDERSTAND AS FAR AS CORRECT STAIR STINGERS AND SUPPORTS. I SHOWED HIM SOME OF THE PICTURES THAT THEY TOOK AND CROSS REFERENCED THEM WITH WHAT I SAW TO SHOW HIM WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. I GOT THE SAME STORY AT THAT TIME SO AT THIS POINT IT'S JUST LIKE THE PICTURES DEPICT,
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> PARDON ME?
I GUESS I'VE EXPRESSED MY OPINION ON THIS CASE, LIKE I SAY I'D LIKE TIME TO FIX IT. IT WILL BE FIXED.
I'M TRYING TO RETIRE AT THIS PARTICULAR MOMENT AND CAN'T DO ANYTHING THIS WEEK EITHER BECAUSE I SOLD AN APARTMENT HOUSE IN ANOTHER PLACE AND THERE GOES THIS WEEK TOO SO I'M DOING THE BEST I CAN DO AS I'VE ALWAYS DONE.
>> ALRIGHT. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 1218 ORANGE AVENUE AND EDWARD VAANDERING IS PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I'LL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT.
>> YES. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DEALING WITH.
OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED.
COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED TO ORDER OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. YOU CAN APPEAL THIS DECISION BUT YOU HAVE TO FILE IT WITHIN 30 DAYS.
ONCE YOU FULL PERMIT YOU HAVE SIX MONTHS TO GET EVERYTHING DONE IF YOU RUN OUT OF TIME YOU CAN WORK WITH THE CITY AND THEY'LL PROBABLY FRONT YOU AN EXTENSION.
[K. 21-1226 2510 Delaware Avenue Vaandering, Edward Edward Smith]
>> WE HAVE TWO BEFORE THE COURT? >> YES.
THAT'S THE NEXT CASE. THAT'S 5K, 21-1226.
[00:35:02]
2510 DELAWARE AVENUE AND EDWARD VAANDERING IS THE OWNER.>> WHEN YOU'RE READY MR. SMITH. >> WE HAVE CASE 21-1226.
2510 DELAWARE AVENUE. EDWARD VAANDERING IS THE OWNER AND THE ADDRESS IS ANGLE ROAD FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED IN JUNE 8TH OF 2021 AND THE VIOLATION IS IPMC.1, 2021 INFESTATION. IPMC 304.7.
ROOF AND DRAINAGE. INTERIOR SURFACES.
IPMC 603 POINT 3, 2021 ELECTRICAL HAZARD.
CORRECTIVE ACTION IS TO TREAT THE PROPERTY FOR INFESTATION OF TERMITES AND MAKE STRUCTURAL REPAIRS TO THE ROOF THAT'S LEAKING AND MAKE NECESSARY THEIR REPAIRS TO THE CEILING THAT IS WARNING AND WATER DAMAGE. MAKE NECESSARY ELECTRICAL REPAIRS TO EXPOSED WIRES IN THE CLOSET.
I HAVE PICTURES HERE. >> THANK YOU.
>> IF YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO ALREADY, CAN YOU LOOK AT THE
PHOTOGRAPH? >> HAVE YOU SEEN THESE?
>> YES. >> THEY FAIRLY AND, RATELY
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> THANK YOU. >> THIS CASE WAS INITIATED THROUGH A COMPLAINT. WE WENT BY AND THE TENANT COMPLAINED ABOUT TERMITES THAT THE HOUSE WAS INFESTED WITH TERMITES TO THE POINT WHERE THEY WERE FLYING AROUND AT NIGHT WHILE PEOPLE WERE IN THE HOUSE. THEY HAVE TO PRETTY MUCH CLEAN UP EVERY NIGHT BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH WINGS AND STUFF, DEAD TERMITES AND STUFF LIKE THAT BUT THEY ALSO COMPLAINED ABOUT THE TOILET IN THE BATHROOM AND THAT THERE WAS A WIRE INSIDE THE CLOSET THAT WAS CAPPED OFF AND THAT WASN'T ACTUALLY BEING USED FOR ANYTHING. THE FLOOR WASN'T FINISHED INSIDE THE BATHROOM. AND THEN THE ROOF WAS WARPED AND THEY SHOWED ME WHERE THE WATER WAS ACTUALLY LEAKING.
THERE'S DETERIORATING WOOD THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE HOUSE WHERE THE TERMITES HAD ATE UP THE WOOD WALLS AND SO THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT THE PICTURES TOOK BASED ON THE COMPLAINTS.
>> AND WHERE THESE TENANTS OF THE HOUSE, FORMER TENANTS YOU
SPOKE WITH? >> NO THEY WERE ACTUALLY LIVING
IN THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME. >> ANY CHILDREN IN THAT HOUSEHOLD? ALRIGHT.
>> MR. VAANDERING? YOU DON'T HAVE TO RESPOND.
IF YOU WANT TO, YOU CAN. >> I'D LIKE TO.
>> GO AHEAD. >> FIRST OF ALL THAT TENANT IS LONG GONE AND SHE DIDN'T HAVE MONEY TO PAY THE RENT.
AS FOR THE ROOF LEAK IS CONCERNED SOMEBODY WENT IN THERE AND I DIDN'T WANT TO RENT IT UNTIL EVERYTHING WAS DONE BUT A MAN SAID I'M VERY HANDY, SO I SAID LET ME NOWHERE THE ROOF IS LEAKING BECAUSE I DON'T SEE IT. HE'S BEEN LIVING THERE FOR THREE MONTHS AND SAID THERE IS NO LEAK.
AS FAR AS TERMITES ARE CONCERNED, YEAH I HIRED THEM AND PAID $1700 TO THEM BUT THE DATE OF THE CLOSING DATE, THE DATE OF THE TERMINATION THAT WAS THE WHOLE PROBLEM.
I HAD TO GET HER OUT BECAUSE SHE WANTED HER TERMITES REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. I CAN'T DO ANYTHING IF THERE'S A TWO MONTH BACK UP LIST. I PAID THEM $1700 AND I CAN'T HAVE THEM DOING A PEST CONTROL TENTHING WHEN SHE'S MOVING OUT.
SHE WAS A VERY DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL.
[00:40:01]
A LOT OF WHAT SHE SAID IS NOT TRUE BUT THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID, AND ONCE AGAIN I WILL LOOK INTO EVERY SITUATION.THE PERSON THAT'S LIVING THERE NOW WITH TWO KIDS IS DOING FINE.
THERE'S NO ROOF LEAKS AND THEY DON'T SEE TERMITES BUT WE'LL
TREAT IT ANYWAY'S. >> MR. VAANDERING?
I HATE TO INTERRUPT PEOPLE. >> OKAY.
I'LL BE QUIET. >> BUT I WANT TO SAY YOU HAVE TWO CASES HERE AND THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICT HORRIBLE LIVING CONDITIONS. HORRIBLE. %-P?
BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 2510 DELAWARE AVENUE AND THAT EDWARD VAANDERING IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I'LL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS IN THE ORDER OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL AND GOOD LUCK FOR YOU. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
WILL YOUR DECISIONS BE FORWARDED TO ME ON PAPER?
>> YES. >> YOU'LL GET IT IN THE MAIL.
>> I NEED TO SEE OUT ON PAPER BECAUSE MY HEARING NOT VERY GOD I COULDN'T HEAR ANYTHING SHE SAID.
AS LONG AS I GET IT ON PAPER I'LL BE FINE.
>> I CAN REPEAT IT. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE.
CAN YOU HEAR ME? >> BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT THE VIOLATIONS EXIST.
YOU WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATION DESCRIBED THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED.
YOU CAN APPEAL THIS WITH THE HIGHER AUTHORITIES IF YOU ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THIS ORDER. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ARE THE BEST EVIDENCE. THAT'S IT.
NEXT CASE, MADAM CLERK? >> I'M NOT GOING TO SAY
[J. 21-1193 211 Orange Avenue Gibbons, Derrick & Kristina Edward Smith]
ANYTHING. >> THE NEXT CASE IS 5J, 21-1193.
211 ORANGE AVENUE, DERRICK AND KRISTINA GIBBONS ARE THE OWNERS.
>> WHEN YOU ARE READY? >> WE HAVE CASE 21-1193, 211 ORANGE AVENUE, CASE WAS INITIATE ON JUNE 4TH, 2021.
OWNERS NAMES ARE DERRICK AND KRISTINA GIBBONS.
1920 RIO VISTA DRIVE, FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA 34989.
VIOLATIONS ARE FBC 105 POINT 1, 2017 PERMIT REQUIRED.
CORRECTIVE ACTION IS OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR CODING.
ROOF WITHOUT PERMIT. AND I HAVE PICTURES.
>> I HAVE NOT SEEN THE PICTURES. >> OKAY.
>> WHILE HE'S LOOKING AT THE PHOTOS DID YOU TAKE THE TOLEDOS AND DID THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES.AND DID THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY
DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? >> YES.M AND DID THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES. >> WE'LL SEE THE EVIDENCE
ENTERED AS CITY ONE COMPOSITE. >> IT WILL BE NOTED AS SO.
>> THANK YOU. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO MA'AM. >> AND MR. GIBBONS? HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE ALLEGATIONS?
>> WE DID HIRE A CONTRACTOR TO COME AND WORK ON THE BUILDING AS IT WAS LEAKING. HE WAS APPLYING I GUESS TO WHAT
[00:45:02]
WAS EXISTING ON THE ROOF AND WHEN THE INSPECTOR CAME UP AND STOPPED WORK, I BELIEVE THERE WAS A CONVERSATION ABOUT HOW IT WAS A ROOF REPAIR AND HE DIDN'T REALLY UNDERSTAND THAT HE NEEDED A PERMIT IN THE PROCESS AND I BELIEVE HE DID GET A PERMIT AND THEN HE NEEDED TO GET A VARIANCE DONE FOR THE PERMIT.DURING THAT TIME, HE CONTRACTED COVID AND HE'S BACK AT IT.
HE TOLD ME YESTERDAY THAT HE WAS MEETING WITH SOMEBODY TO GET THE VARIANCE DONE. IT'S BEEN A NIGHTMARE TO GET THAT PAPER WORK SIGNED OFF BECAUSE IT NEEDED TO BE
ENGINEERED. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> I'D LIKE JUST AN EXTENSION ON GETTING A PERMIT.
OR GETTING THE VARIANCE ON THE PERMIT.
>> OKAY. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT ORANGE ORANGE AND DERRICK AND KRISTINA GIBBONS ARE THE PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. YOU WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. ONCE YOU PULL THE PERMIT YOU HAVE SIX MONTHS TO COMPLETE EVERYTHING IF YOU DON'T GET IT DONE ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS CALL THE CODE OFFICE.
[M. 21-1299 1022 Hispana Avenue McDonald, Wanna Logan Winn]
30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THE NEXT CASE IS 5M.
CASE 21-1299. 1022 HISPANA AVENUE.
WANNA MCDONALD IS THE OWNER. >> WHEN YOU ARE READY?
>> CASE NUMBERS 21-1299. ADDRESS OF 1022 HISPANA AVENUE.
OWNER IS WANNA MCDONALD, FOR AN OF ROUTE ONE BOX 264 FAIRMONT, WEST VIRGINIA 26554. VIOLATION 105.1, 2017 PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS TO OBTAIN PERMIT FOR REPLACING THE FACET WITHOUT A PERMIT.
I DO HAVE SOME PICTURES OF THE THESE.
>> I HAVE NOT SEEN PHOTOS BUT I KNOW.
DO YOU WANT THESE FROM THE ROOFING COMPANY?
>> NO. >> DID THE PHOTOS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW MR. LOGAN WINN SO HE WAS AWAY FROM THE MICROPHONE BUT HE SAID YES AND WE MOVE THEM IN AS CITY
COMPOSITE ONE. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS
>> AND WOULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME PLEASE?
>> I'M DONNA MCDONALD AND THE OWNER IS MY 87-YEAR-OLD MOTHER
BUT I LIVE IN THE HOUSE. >> OKAY.
>> AND YOU'VE HAD THE ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THE CITY REPRESENTATIVE? HOW DO YOU RESPOND?
>> I HIRED A ROOFER TO DO THAT AND I CALLED THEM LAST WEEK WHEN I GOT THE NOTICE AND THEY SAID THAT IT WAS ALL IN ONE PERMIT AND IT WAS SIGNED OFF ON. THE FINAL APPROVAL HAD BEEN
SIGNED OFF ON. >> DO YOU HAVE A COPY OF THAT?
>> THIS IS WHAT THE ROOFER SENT M
ME. >> IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY I THINK THIS PERMIT WAS PULLED AND IT WAS FOR ROOF ONLY REPLACEMENT AND THIS WAS WRITTEN FOR A REPLACEMENT OF THE SERVE E.T..
I >> WAS IN THE SAME LIST SIGNED OFF AT THE FINAL. SHE SAYS WHEN, THIS IS WHAT SHE TOLD ME BECAUSE I HAVE NO CHEW. SHE SAID WHEN THEY COME AND DO
[00:50:03]
THE FINAL INSPECTION THAT EVERYTHING THAT'S ON THAT LIST IS UNDER THAT PERMIT THAT WAS PULLED AND EVERYTHING WAS SIGNED OFF ON. SHE SAID TALL OF THIS WASINCLUDED IN THE LIST. >> DO YOU KNOW IF IT WAS
IMPROVED OR REMOVED OR REPLACED? >> YEAH IT'S BEEN REPLACED BUT THE ROOFERS DID IT. I HIRED A ROOFER TO REPLACE THE ROOF AND THEY REPLACED THE ROOF AND THAT.
>> DID YOU HEAR WHAT MR. LOGAN WINN SAID THAT THOSE ARE TWO
SEPARATE PERMITS. >> WELL I DON'T KNOW.
I HIRED SOMEBODY TO DO IT AND LIKE I SAID, I CALLED THEM LAST WEEK AND SAID, YOU KNOW I GOT THIS NOTICE AND SHE SAID THAT, SHE SENT ME THAT AND SAID EVERYTHING WAS ON A LIST AND WHEN THEY COME AND DO THE FINAL INSPECTION, IT WAS APPROVED AND SIGNED OFF ON AND EVERYTHING ON THAT LIST IS SIGNED OFF ON.
AND THOSE THINGS ARE ON THAT LIST.
>> MR. LOGAN WINN? >> WITHOUT IT IN FRONT OF ME RIGHT NOW, FROM LOOK AT IT THERE WAS NO LISTING OF SOFFIT OR PHASE SHA. I DON'T SEE US REMOVING AND REPLACING ROOFING MATERIAL ONLY AND THEN ARBITRARILY INCLUDING THAT IN THERE WITHOUT ANY MENTION OF IT IN THE PERMIT
APPLICATION. >> DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
>> I MEAN I UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S SAYING, YES, BUT I'M JUST SAYING WHAT THE ROOFING COMPANY SAID. I PAID THEM $11,000 AND THIS IS WHAT SHE TOLD ME. I DON'T KNOW.
THEY'VE BEEN IN TOWN FOR, THEY DO A LOT OF ROOFING, RIGHT? I WOULD THINK THAT THEY WOULD - I WOULD THINK THAT THEY WOULD KNOW WHAT THEY'RE SUPPOSE TO BE DOING.
I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW. >> HOLD ON.
MR. COSS IS THE BUILDING SUPERVISOR.
>> WHAT MR. LOGAN WINN IS SAYING.
PERMITS ARE ONLY FOR THE ROOF COVERING AND THESE THINGS ARE NOT INCLUDED WITH THE REROOF PERMIT AND THERE'S SEPARATE LOAD REQUIREMENTS FOR THESE THINGS. WHAT I WAS PULLING UP IS AN INSPECTION LIST PROVIDED TO ALL CONTRACTORS OR OWNERS WHEN THE PERMIT IS ISSUED AND IT HAS THE INSPECTION CODES FOR EACH INSPECTION TYPE. UNDER ROOF INSPECTIONS THERE'S THESE INSPECTIONS AND YOU'LL NOTICE THERE IS NO SOFFIT OR FACIA IN THAT LIST BECAUSE IT IS A SEPARATE PERMIT.
>> WHAT DO I DO NOW? DO I CALL THE ROOFING COMPANY.
SHOULDN'T THEY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS? THEIR THE ONES THAT DID THE WORK.
>> HERE'S WHAT I'M WILLING TO DO.
I'M WILLING TO CONTINUE THIS UNTIL MY NEXT DOCKET TO GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONTACT YOUR CONTRACTORS OR ROOFERS OR WHOEVER AND TELL THEM THERE WAS NO PERMIT PULLED FOR THE SOFFIT AND PHASE YOU AND THEY SHOULD KNOW WHAT TO DO.
THEY SHOULD SHOW IT TO SOMEBODY IN THEY HAVE IT BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THE WORK HAS BEEN DONE, AS FAR AS EVIDENCE IS CONCERNED, WITHOUT A PERMIT BUT I'M WILLING TO GIVE YOU 30 DAYS TO STRAIGHTEN THIS OUT. OR THE NEXT DOCKET I'LL SAY IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS JUST ASK THE PEOPLE FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. ASK AFTER YOUR CASE HAS BEEN DETERRED AND WE SEE THIS ALL THE TIME.
>> RIGHT. >> AND ESPECIALLY NOW.
WE SEE IT QUITE A BIT. SO IT'S NOT THAT YOU DID ANYTHING WRONG, BUT YOU ARE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT IF THEY DID IT THEY DID NOT PULL THE PERMIT, AND IF THEY DID COMPLETE IT, THEN PULLING A PERMIT SHOULD TAKE CARE OF THIS.
>> OKAY. WELL I'LL CALL THEM AS SOON AS I LEAVE HERE AND TELL THEM THEY NEED TO DO SOMETHING.
>> MRS. MCDONALD? HERE YOU GO.
HERE'S MY CARD TOO. YOU CAN CALL ME AFTER YOU TALK TO THEM. THANKS.
[N. 21-1325 700 Skylark Drive, A Hatfield, James Logan Winn]
[00:55:04]
THE NEXT CASE IS 5N, CASE 21-1325, 700 SKYLARK DRIVE, A.JAMES HATFIELD IS THE OWNER. >> WHEN YOU ARE READY.
>> 21-1325. ADDRESS IS 700 SKYLARK DRIVE, A.
THE OWNER IS JAMES HATFIELD, P.O. BOX 4447, FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA 34948. VIOLATIONS.
IPMC 304 POINT 7 ROOFS AND DRAINAGE.
605.2, 2021, ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES.
>> 603.1, 2021 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.
IPMC 304.9, 2021, OVER HAND EXTENSIONS.
IPMC 504.3, PLUMBING SYSTEM HAZARD, INTERIOR SURFACES.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IS REPAIR THE ROOF THAT'S LEAKING AND REPLACE COVERS FOR THE ELECTRICAL COVERAGE BOX AND ROTTEN SOMETHING IT AND REPLACE THE EXHAUST DUCT.
SEAL THE SEWER TANK LID. REPLACE DRY WALL BEHIND THE WATER HEATER AND MISSING BATHROOM TILES AND REPLACE THE ROTTEN DOOR JAM IN THE UTILITY ROOMS AND MAKE REPAIR AS TO THE WATER DAMAGE CEILING AND HOLES I THE WALLS.
I HAVE NUMEROUS PICTURES HERE. >> OKAY.
>> SHE GOT THEM IN TO HEARING. >> SO THIS TIME WE MOVE THEM IN AS CITY ONE COMPOSITE. ANYTHING FURTHER MR. LOGAN WINN.
>> I'M PROPERTY MANAGER FOR JAMES HATFIELD.
>> YOU'VE SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPHS. HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE
ALLEGATIONS? >> I MEAN I'M NOT DISPUTING IT.
THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD ASK RIGHT NOW IS THAT I WILL NOTE THAT MR. COSS IS AWARE AND LOGAN TOO THAT MR. HATFIELD WAS ILL AND HE SPENT TIME IN THE HOSPITAL SO I'M TRYING TO GET EVERYTHING STRAIGHTENED OUT, SO I WOULD ASK FOR AN EXTENSION AND THEN THE ONLY QUESTIONS THAT I HAVE IS IN THIS LET AT THE BOTTOM IT SAYS PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED SO I'M JUST A LITTLE CONFUSED AS TO WHAT ON THE LIST WE'RE GOING TO NEED TO PULL PERMITS FOR AND IS IT INDIVIDUAL PERMITS.
DO I HAVE TO HAVE ONE PERMIT TOO FIX THIS.
THOSE FOR QUESTIONS I HAVE AND IT IF WE CAN GET AN EXTENSION.
>> I SUGGEST YOU GET WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND THEY'LL LET YOU KNOW WHAT'S NEEDED BUT THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE SPELLED OUT AND THEY'LL TELL YOU WHAT YOU KNEE A PERMIT FOR.
ANYTHING FURTHER? BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 700 SKYLARK DRIVE, A AND THAT JAMES HATFIELD IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I WILL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO PULL THE PERMIT. COMPLY WITH ALL PERMITS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS IN THE ORDER OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED.
YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. GOOD LUCK.
NEXT CASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS I 5 O.
[O. 21-1931 711 S Indian River Drive Murray, Dylan and Kristin Logan Winn]
711 SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE. DYLAN MURRAY IS THE OWNER.SIR WOULD YOU TAKE YOUR HAT OFF? >> THE ADDRESS IS 711 SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE. THE OWNER IS DYLAN MURRAY.
CASE IS INITIATED AUGUST 10TH OF 2021.
VIOLATION FBC 105.1, 2017 PERMIT REQUIRED.
RENEW EXPIRED PER MYTH THAT 19-272 A HOPPING WITH REVISED
[01:00:02]
PLANS TO SHOW REJECTED PLANS CORRECTIONS.>> DOES THE PICTURE FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? AT THIS TIME WE MOVE IT IN AS COMPOSITE ONE.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER MR. LOGAN WINN?
>> WHAT WAS THE DATE YOU SAID? >> THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON
AUGUST 10TH OF 2021. >> SIR, YOU HAVE TO TALK IN THE
MICROPHONE. >> I WAS ASKING WHAT THE DATE WAS BECAUSE THE PERMIT WERE PULLED IN 2019 AND BE AS FAR AS, IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME RIGHT, I SUBMITTED THE REJECTED PLANS AND THEY WERE LOOKING FOR A VARIANCE ON A SLAB THAT WAS EXISTING AND ITS WITH NOT ON THE PLAN THAT ORIGINALLY GOT PUT IN AND I HAD THEM REDRAWN WITH PUTTING THE EXISTING SLAB AN THERE.
WHEN I SUBMITTED THEM AGAIN THIS WAS SOME TIME IN 2019 THAT I DID THIS. I NEVER HEARD BACK FROM ANYBODY AND THAT'S THE LAST I HEARD OF IT AND IT BEEN SINCE THEN.
THIS IS THE FIRST I'VE HEARD OF IT SINCE THEN.
ANYWAY'S I HAD THE DOCK BOX TAKEN DOWN BECAUSE OF COURSE WE
SO WHERE ARE WE NOW WITH THE HOUSE? HAVE YOU DONE ALL THE RENOVATIONS?
>> IT IS A BARN THAT WAS BUILT. I BELIEVE MOST OF THE PER MYTHING WE'RE ALREADY PAST EXCEPT THEY WERE WAITING, LIKE I SAID IF I REMEMBER RIGHT THEIR WAITING ON A VARIANCE BECAUSE OF THE EXISTING SLAB. BUT YES, I HAD TO CONTINUE ON BECAUSE AT THE TIME, I ONLY HAD PLYWOOD ON TOP OF THE POLL BARN AND AS WAS WAITING IT WAS SUMMERTIME AND I WAS GETTING RAIN EVERY DAY AND I HAD THE ROOFER COME AND GET IT DRIED AND IN PUT METAL ON IT AS WELL. WE LET IT SIT FOR A WHILE AND THE WAIT I COULD HEAR BACK TO THE CITY AGAIN AFTER I SUBMITTED THE PLANS AND AGAIN NEVER HEARD BACK.
HE CALLED ME BACK AND SAID HE HAD TO GET THE METAL ON THE ROOF AND I DO HAVE PICTURES OF EVERYTHING THAT HE DID UP ON THE ROOF. BUT AFTER THAT, AGAIN, I DIDN'T HEAR NEGLECT FROM THE CITY AFTER I SUBMITTED THE PLANS WITH THE REVISE THE EXISTING SLABS ON THE PLANS.
I DON'T KNOW WHERE TO GO FROM HERE THOUGH.
>> I'M GOING TO CONTINUE THIS FOR 30 DAYS SO YOU CAN FOLLOW UP ON WHAT THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, OR WHAT VIOLATIONS YOU HAVE AND YOU NEED TOO RENEW YOUR EXPIRED PERMIT.
>> IS THAT WHAT I NEED TO DO? >> WELL YOU NEED TO GET WITH THEM BECAUSE THERE MAY BE OTHER THINGS.
>> JUST TO RENEW THE PERMIT TO KEEP IT FROM GETTING IN TROUBLE
OR FINED OR WHAT NOT? >> YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE THERE'S NO OTHER VIOLATIONS IF YOU APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE AND DIDN'T GET IT YOU NEED TO FOLLOW UP WITH THAT PARTICULAR
DEPARTMENT. >> THAT'S WHY I SUBMITTED THE DRAWINGS IS BECAUSE OF THE VARIANCE AND I NEVER HEARD NEGLECT BACK FROM IT AFTER I SUBMITTED THOSE PLANS.
LIKE I DON'T EVEN HAVE THOSE MANS ANYMORE.
>> I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU 30 DAYS TO FOLLOW UP, AND IF YOU HAVE DONE ALL YOU NEED TOO DO YOU WON'T NEED TO COME BACK, BUT IF NOT YOU HAVE TO COME BACK AND POSSIBLY FACE A VIOLATION SO I'LL CONTINUE THIS FOR 30 DAYS. THANK YOU.
>> THE NEXT CASE IS A CALL IN CASE.
[L. 21-1230 2725 Fairway Drive Damien, itzia & Hurtado, Gonzaldo Logan Winn]
LET'S SEE. 5L CASE 21-12:30, 2725 FAIRWAY DRIVE AND WE'LL BE CALLING DAMIEN, ITZIA, HURTA GONZALDO.3 DRIVE AND WE'LL BE CALLING DAMIEN, ITZIA, HURTA GONZALDO.>> WHEN YOU ARE READY. >> I HAVE TO CALL.
HERE WE GO. >> IS THIS THE ONLY CALL IN WE
[01:05:07]
HAVE THIS MORNING? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> HI. THIS IS ELIZABETH WITH THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
YOU ARE ON THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING.
>> OKAY. >> CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY?
>> YES, I CAN. >> I HAVE TOO SWEAR YOU IN FOR
>> IF IT'S SAFE COULD YOU PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD? >> DAMIEN, ITZIA, HURTA
GONZALDO. >> DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU PROVIDE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
>> YES. >> OKAY THE NEXT VOICE YOU'LL
HEAR IS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. >> GOOD MORNING I'M FRAN ROSS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AND LOGAN WINN WILL PRESENT YOUR CASE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY THIS MORNING. YOU MAY PROCEED.
>> CASE 21-12:30, ADDRESS 2725 FAIRWAY DRIVE, CASE WAS INITIATED JUNE 9TH OF 2021. THE OWNER IS DAMIEN, ITZIA, HURTA GONZALDO OF 2725 FAIRWAY DRIVE, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34982. VIOLA VIOLATIONS 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO OBTAIN PERMIT FOR WORK BEING DONE TO THE DRIVEWAY WITHOUT A PERMIT. I HAVE A PICTURE OF THE DRIVE
WAY WORK. >> AND WAS IT E-MAILED TO THE
RESPONDENT? >> NO, HE CAME INTO THE OFFICE ON THE 8TH AND I SHOWED HIM THE PHOTOGRAPH THEN.
>> AND IT IS THE SAME PHOTO? >> YES.
>> THIS TIME WE MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPH IN AS CITY ONE.
>> ADMITTED AS SUCH. >> THANK YOU.
>> DID START A DP C R PROCESS WITH US ON THE EIGHTH FOR THIS CA CASE.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER, MR. LOGAN WINN.
HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE ALLEG
ALLEGATIONS? >> GUILTY OF NOT PULLING PERMIT.
I STARTED THE PROCESS AND NOW I'LL CONTINUE WITH IT.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> I'M SORRY?
JUST APOLOGIZE AND I WILL MAKE SURE EVERYTHING GETS
MR. LOGAN WINN ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO MA'AM.
>> THEN BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 2725 FAIRWAY DRIVE AND THAT DAMIEN, ITZIA, HURTA GONZALDO ARE THE PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I WOULD GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL THOSE IN THE ORDER OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU.
>> YOU'RE WELCOME. >> THANK YOU.
>> IS THAT ALL THE CALL IN? >> THAT'S IT.
>> WE'RE DONE WITH EVERYTHING? >> YES WE'LL GO BACK TO THE
OTHER ONES THAT DIDN'T SHOW. >> HOW WERE THEY NOTIFIED?
[C. 21-771 1217 S 12th Street Martin, Natalia Ramirez Edward Smith]
>> WE'LL READ THEM IN. WE'LL BE ON CASE 5 C, 20-771.
1217 SOUTH 12TH STREET. NATALIA RAMIREZ MARTIN IS THE OW OWNER.
>> IS THAT THE ONLY ONE OR ARE WE GOING TO READ THEM ALL IN
TOGETHER? >> YEAH, WE'RE GOING TO READ
THEM IN. >> I THINK INDIVIDUALLY SPECIAL
>> I'LL QUESTION THE WITNESSES IF IT MIGHT SPEED THINGS UP.
MR. SMITH? READY WHEN YOU ARE.
>> WE HAVE A LOT OF THEM HERE TO READ IN.
[01:10:06]
>> OKAY. >> SO WERE YOU ASSIGNED TO CASE
>> INITIATED ON APRIL 8TH OF THIS YEAR?
>> YES. >> WHAT WAS THE NATURE OF THE
VIOLATION? >> THEY BUILT A BACK PATIO STRUCTURE ON THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY WITHOUT A PERMIT.
>> IS THAT IN VIOLATION OF 105.1?
>> YES. >> THE RECOMMENDATION THAT APPEARS ON THE AGENDA THIS MORNING IS THAT YOUR
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE I HAVE NOTHING FURTHER UNLESS YOU WANT
TO PUT THE PICTURES IN. >> DO HAVE ONE PICTURE.
>> OKAY. SO DOES IT FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? AT THIS TIME WE WOULD MOVE THE
PICTURE IN AS CITY ONE. >> OKAY.
>> AND FOR THE RECORD, NEITHER OF THESE.
>> I THINK THERE'S ONLY ONE PERSON LISTED, MARTINEZ.
>> I WONDERED IF MARE TIN WAS A SPOUSE.
I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 1217 SOUTH 12TH STREET AND NATALIA RAMIREZ MARTIN IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE AND I'LL GIVE HER 60 TODAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS EVERY 180 DAYS UP UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS IN THE ORDER OR A FINE OF ONE HUNDRED
[D. 21-782 714 Grandview Blvd. Malinska Cargo Shipping LLC Edward Smith]
DOLLARS A DAY BE ASSESSED. >> NEXT CASE IS 5 D.
CASE 21-782, 714 GRANDVIEW BOUL BOULEVARD. MALINSKA CARGO SHIPPING LLC IS THE OWNER AND THIS CASE WAS CONTINUED TO THIS DOCKET FROM THE AUGUST SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING.
>> THANK YOU. >> MR. SMITH WERE YOU ASSIGNED
>> CAN YOU REMIND THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WHERE WE LEFT OFF AT THE LAST HEARING? DO YOU REMEMBER?
>> NO. >> WELL SPECIAL MAGISTRATE I DON'T REMEMBER THIS CASE NUMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD SO I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH THE REGULAR QUESTIONS.
WAS THE CASE INITIATED ON APRIL 9TH OF 2021?
>> YES. >> AND WHAT'S THE NATURE OF THE
VIOLATION? >> THEY DID A DRY WALL, ROOF, ELECTRICAL WORK AN PLUMBING WITHOUT A PERMIT.
>> DO YOU KNOW IF ANY PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPLIED FOR BETWEEN
AUGUST AND NOW? >> NO PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPLIED
FOR. >> IS THAT IN VIOLATION OF
>> IS THE RECOMMENDATION THAT APPEARS ON THE AGENDA THIS MORNING STILL YOUR RECOMMENDATION?
>> YES. >> OKAY DO YOU HAVE NEW OR
DIFFERENT PICTURES TO ENTER? >> I HAVE PICTURES.
>> TO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES. >> SO I'M GOING TO MOVE THEM IN AS CITY ONE I GUESS. THERE'S A POSSIBILITY THEY COULD BE CUMULATIVE TO WHAT'S ALREADY IN THE FILE.
I GUESS THEY COULD BE CALLED CITIES ONE DATED NO NOVEMBER 1
OF THIS YEAR. >> YOU WANT TO WRITE THAT?
>> AT THIS TIME WE ASK THAT YOU FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATION AS
NOTED ON THIS MORNING AGENDA. >> ANYONE HERE ON BEHALF OF MALINSKA CARGO SHIPPING LLC? THERE'S NO ONE SO MY RECOMMENDATION BASED TOP EVIDENCE PRESENTED IS THAT THE VIOLATION DOES EXIST. THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS OR A FIND OF $100 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. THEY HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[E. 21-968 960 S US HWY 1 960 US 1 LLC Edward Smith]
>> OKAY. THE NEXT CASE IS 5E, 950 SOUTH
US HIGHEAY 1. >> MR. SMITH Y YOU ASSIGNED TO
AND WAS THAT INITIATED IN MAY OF THIS YEAR?
>> WHAT WAS THE NATURE OF THE VIOLATION?
>> YES. THEY WERE CHANGING A CANOPY AND
[01:15:03]
STAIRS WITHOUT A PERMIT. SO THEY DEMOLITIONED.THEY NEEDED A DEMO AND REROOF PERMIT.
>> HAVE ANY PERMITS BEEN APPLIED FOR?
>> THE APPLICATION FOR THE FLOOR THERE WAS A PERMIT SUBMITTED BUT THE APPLICATION INDICATES THAT FLOOR JOINTS WERE BEING REPLACED AND THE WOOD STAIRS AND THE REPAIRING OF THE DECK.
THE ROOF IS NOT ADDRE PERMIT. >> SO THE EXISTING PERMIT DOES NOT CONTAIN WITHIN SCOPE THE WORK BEING DONE?
>> RIGHT. >> DID YOU TAKE ANY PHOTOGRAPH?
>> YES I DID. >> DO THEY FAIRLY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? LET'S MOVE THEM IN AS CITY ONE
COMPOSITE. >> THEY'LL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> THE RECOMMENDATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MORNING AGENDA IS THAT STILL YOUR RECOMMENDATION?
>> YES. >> VIOLATION PURSUANT TO 105.1.
WE ASK YOU FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH.
>> THE PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BEED A MYTHED.
THANK YOU. THERE'S NO ONE HERE ON BEHALF OF 960 US 1 LLC SO I'LL FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAY UNTIL THE PERMITS ARE CLOSED AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 DAY WILL BE ASSESSED AND THEY HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[F. 21-1091 1904 Avenue K, Apt B Recinos, Eduardo Logan Winn]
OKAY. NEXT CASE?>> THE NEXT CASE IS CASE 21-1091, 1904 AVENUE K, APARTMENT B, EDUARDO RECINOS IS THE OWNER.
>> MR. LOGAN WINN WERE YOU ASSIGNED TO CASE 211091? WAS THAT INITIATED ON MAY 13TH OF THIS YEAR?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THE MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS ARE LISTED ON THIS MORNINGS AGENDA, ARE THOSE STILL A LEDGEED?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> GENERALLY SPEAKING CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE NATURE OF THE VIOLATIONS?
>> GENERALLY THERE WERE MULTIPLE ELECTRICAL BOXES THAT WERE IN DISREPAIR OR YOU KNOW WERE SAFETY HAZARDS.
SOME PLUMBING THINGS AND A COUPLE OF ROOF LEAKS AND SOME WARPED CEILINGS AND ROTTEN WOOD OUTSIDE.
>> DID YOU TAKE PHOTOGRAPH? >> I DID.
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? WE MOVE THEM IN AS CITY ONE COMPOSITE.
>> THEY'LL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. >> THANK YOU.
>> SO THERE ARE FOUR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS LISTED ON THIS MORNINGS AGENDA. ARE THOSE STILL YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION? AND THE INFORMATION UNDER THE RECOMMENDATION SECTION IS STILL
>> SO AT THIS TIME SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WE ASK YOU FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATION AS LISTED AND THAT THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO TAKE THE RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ONE THROUGH
EDUARDO RECINOS IS NOT HERE AND NEITHER IS THEIR A REPRESENTATIVE AVAILABLE ON HIS BEHALF.
I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 1904 AVENUE K, APARTMENT B AND THESE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
HE HAS 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDER OR A FINE OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS A DAY BE ASSESSED.
[G. 21-1673 1904 Avenue K, Apt B Recinos, Eduardo Logan Winn]
SAME ADDRESS, 1904 AVENUE K, APARTMENT B, EDUARDO RECINOS IS
THE OWNER. >> MR. LOGAN WINN WERE YOU IS A
SIGNED TO THIS CASE? ALL >> YES, MA'AM.
>> INITIATED IN JULY OF THIS YEAR?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THE VIOLATION NOTE IS IPMC 605.1. IS THAT ACCURATE?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> AND THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
ARE STILL ACCURATE? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE NATURE OF THE VIOLATION?
>> BASICALLY TWO THINGS. ONE, THE STOVE WAS INOPERABLE
[01:20:01]
AND THE LIGHT SWITCH IN THE BATHROOM DID NOT WORK EITHER ANDDID YOU TAKE PHOTOGRAPH? >> I DID.
>> DO THEY FAIRLY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW? IS IT JUST ONE PHOTOGRAPH? AT THIS TIME WE MOVE IN AS CITY ONE AND SPECIAL MAGISTRATE I ASK THAT YOU FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATION AS NOTED ON THIS MORNING AGENDA.
NOTED THAT EDUARDO RECINOS IS NOT PRESENT AND NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HIS BEHALF, SO I WILL FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND HE'S GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNDERSTAND THE I'LL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $50 WILL BE ASSESSED AND HE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[P. 21-2065 1405 N 25th Street NM & HM Inc Logan Winn]
>> OKAY. THE LAST, YEP THE LAST CASE IS 5P 21-20651405 NORTH 25TH STREET.
NM & HM INC IS THE OWNER. >> MR. LOGAN WINN WERE YOU
ASSIGNED TO THIS CASE? >> YES.
>> AND WAS THAT CASE INITIATED SEPTEMBER FIRST OF THIS YEAR?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THE MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS ARE LISTED ON THIS MORNINGS AGENDA. ARE THOSE DIFFERENT PARTS STILL
>> THERE ARE THREE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS LISTED.
ARE ALL OF THOSE CORRECTIONS NEEDING TO STILL BE MADE?
>> WHERE HE IS MA'AM. >> CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE NATURE
OF THE VIOLATION? >> IT'S GENERALLY A BALCONY ON THE FRONT AND BACK OF THE BUILDING WITH TWO STAIRCASES.
MOST OF THE BALCONIES HAVE SEVERE CRACKING IN THEM AND ALONG WITH THE STAIRS AND THE GUARDS AND HANDRAILS ARE IN SEVERE DISREPAIR AND NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.
>> DID YOU TAKE PHOTOGRAPH? >> YES.
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
AT THIS TIME WE'LL MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS IN AS CITY ONE
COMPOSITE. >> THEY'LL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE I ASK YOU FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATION AS
NOTED ON THIS MORNING AGENDA. >> THANK YOU.
THERE BEING NO ONE PRESENT FOR NM & HM INC, HOWEVER I WILL FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 1405 NORTH 25TH STREET.
I WILL GIVE THEM 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNDERSTAND THE I'LL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OF THE VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PER MYTH OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED AND YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
>> HOW WERE THEY NOTIFIED? >> NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE VIOLATORS CERTIFIED MAIL. IN THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED SIGNED IT WILL BE PLACED IN THE FILE.
IF IT'S UNCLAIMED A NOTICE OF HEARING ENCLOSED IS MAILED TO THE VIOLATOR AND THEN TEN DAYS BEFORE REGULAR U.S. MAIL COPY WAS PLACED AND A COPY WAS PLACED IN THE INSPECTOR FILE TEN DAYS BEFORE TO HEARING AND IT POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD IN THE LOBBY OF CITY HALL AND IS POSTED AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING IF THE CERTIFICATION CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT POSTING IS COMPLETED AS IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED.
>> OKAY. THERE BEING NO FURTHER
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.