Mar 15, 2022 Special Magistrate Hearing

[1. CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:12]

>> GOOD MORNING. I AM A SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WHO WILL BE PRESIDING OVER THIS MORNING POSZ MIKE CAIRNS.

YOU'RE HERE BECAUSE YOU RECEIVED NOTICE THAT YOUR PROPERTY WAS POSSIBLY A VIOLATION OF A CODE OR ORDINANCE IS GIVEN A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME TO CORRECT THAT AND AS OF THIS MORNING YOU HAVE NOT DONE THAT.

DOES ANYBODY HERE NEED AN INTERPRETER? CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME? I NEED A SPANISH INTERPRETER? AND THAT'S IT. IT'S BEEN RECORDED SO SOMEBODY SAYS I SILENT TV, JUST REMEMBER YOU PROBABLY SAW YOU ON A CITY OF FORT PIERCE NETWORK. YOU ARE BEING RECORDED, SO BE AWARE OF THAT. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO WISH TO BE HEARD IF YOU DON'T MIND STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

>> PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. YOU WANT THEM TO REMAIN STANDING SO THEY CAN BE SWORN, ADAM CLARKE.

>> EVERYONE HE WAS GOING TO GIVE TESTIMONY RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR OR FROM THE TESTIMONY WILL PROVIDE WILL BE THE TRUTH?

THANK YOU. >> WE HAVE CASE 5B, CASE 2119

[1. 20-2425 * 600 Edwards Road WBC Collections LP Ed Smith]

[B. 21-1911 907 Antigua Avenue Young, Kelly Ann Frank Remling]

>> GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS MR. YATES.

I WORK FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE AS A BUILDING INSPECTOR INVESTIGATOR AND HAPPENED PREVIOUSLY SWORN IN.

THIS CASE NUMBER IS 21 1911 -7 ANTIQUA AVENUE CASE INITIATED AUGUST 5, 2021. THE OWNER IS KELLY AND YOUNG, 2619 S. BROCK SMITH GROVE, FORT SMITH FOR THAT.

BEFORE 945. THE VIOLATION IS FOR THE BUILDING CODE ONE OF 5.2 THOUSAND 17 PERMIT REQUIRED IN THE CORRECTION DID CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING ENCLOSURE REPLACING THE DOORS AND WINDOWS AND EXISTING DOORS AND WINDOWS.

AND I DO HAVE SOME PICTURES HERE.

SOME OF THE PICTURES CHRIS TALK AND I WENT BACK AND TOOK MY OWN PICTURES AND THE RESIDENCE IS STILL THE SAMEL AS IT WAS WHEN HE TOOK THE PICTURES. AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE SEEN

THE PICTURES WERE NOT? >> NO, SIR.

>> SHOW THOSE TO HIM, PLEASE. >> DO ALL OF THE PHOTOS TO DATE THE ONES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY TAKEN BY ANOTHER EMPLOYEE TODAY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE PROPERTY AS YOU OBSERVED

IT? >> YES, MA'AM.

IT'S OKAY. SO THE FIRST SET, THE FIRST ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR PAGES OF PHOTOS OF THE ONES THAT A PREVIOUS EMPLOYEE TOOK, AND THE NEXT ONE, 23, THREE PHOTOS ARE

FROM YOU OR GOOGLE MAPS? >> YES.

>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WOULD MOVE INTO EVIDENCE AS COMPOSITE

EXHIBIT ONE. >> OKAY.

>> THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS

SUCH. >> YOUR HONOR, CAN AT THIS POINT SAY WE ARE NOT DISPUTING THE SITUATION.E JUST ASKING FOR MORE TIME THE HOMEOWNER HAS AN ENGINEER WHO'S BEEN WORKING ON PRODUCING BLUEPRINTS AND SOME HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED.

I THINK THERE'S BEEN A REJECTION OF SOME OF THOSE PLANS OR PORTIONS OF THE PLANTS.

AND WE'RE JUST GOING BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD TO GET IT

[00:05:25]

>> NO, MA'AM. EVERYTHING IS REJECTED AND THEY ARE TRYING TO GET IT. THEY HAVE ENGINEER TRYING TO

GET ALL THE PAPERWORK DONE. >> HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU THINK HE OR SHE NEEDS TO GET THE PAPERWORK DONE?

>> I WOULD ASK FOR SIX WEEKS, YOUR HONOR.

I UNDERSTAND THAT ENGINEERS AND DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND EVERYBODY ARE REALLY BEHIND AT THIS TIME.

>> THEY ARE. >> YES.

>> SO HAVE YOU STARTED THE PERMITTING PROCESS?

>> I BELIEVE SO, YES. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, JUST FOR CLARITY. THE INITIAL PERMIT WAS SUBMITTED FOR OCTOBER 1, 2021. IT WAS REJECTED.

SHORTLY AFTER THAT AND THERE WAS A REVISION THAT WAS SUBMITTED JANUARY 10, 2022. AND THAT'S BEEN REJECTED SINCE JANUARY 25 AT 2022. SO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD HAS HAD APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS TO WORK ON THE REVISIONS ALREADY SINCE THE NOTICE OF REJECTION HAS BEEN SET.

RESPECTFULLY, STAFFORD REQUEST WE GO AHEAD AND FIND AN ORDER DETERMINING VIOLATION. WE CAN CERTAINLY PROVIDE IN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMITS BEFORE ANY FINES WOULD START.

>> OKAY. DO YOU KNOW WHY THE PERMIT WAS

REJECTED? >> IT WAS FOR INSUFFICIENT

DETAIL OF THE PERMIT PLANS. >> OKAY.

>> I'M SORRY. I'M A LITTLE HARD OF HEARING.

WHAT WAS YOUR PROPOSAL? >> TO FIND AN ORDER DETERMINING VIOLATION AND PROVIDE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT BEFORE ANY FINES WAS STARTED CRYING. DUE DATE START ACCRUING.

>> THAT SOUNDS REASONABLE. >> IF WE GET THIS SUBMITTED THERE WON'T BE ANY FINES. DOC IS A HARD DEADLINE FOR THE

ENGINEER. >> RIGHT.

YOU REALIZE ONCE THEY PULL THE PERMIT THEY HAVE SIX MONTHS TO GET EVERYTHING DONE, AND IF YOU NEED AN EXTENSION, THE CITY CAN

WORK WITH YOU ON THAT. >> YES, .

ALL RIGHT. BASED ON EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND VIOLATION EXISTS AT 907 ANTIQUA AVENUE AND THAT KELLY YOUNG IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION APPEARED SHE HAS 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT, GAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN N CLOSED D AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS AND THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED DDF UNDER $100 A DAY TO BE ASSESSED AND YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.

WHEN SHE PULLED THE PERMIT YOU HAVE SIX MONTHS TO GET EVERYTHING DONE AND IF YOU NEED AN EXTENSION THE CITY WOULD MORE THAN LIKELY GIVE YOU ONE FOR JUST CAUSE.

>> AS YOU KNOW, THIS IS NOT MY NORMAL VIEW.

THANK YOU. >> WE ARE GOING TO JUMP TO A

[B. 20-1915 1903 San Diego Avenue Watkins (III), Leroy Lammers, Shelita Mack, Shelia Shaun Coss ]

>> THIS IS 20 Ã19154 1903 SAN DIEGO AVENUE THIS IS A MASSEY HEARING FOR REDUCTION OF VIOLENCE IN THIS CASE WAS INITIATED AUGUST 20, 2020. THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY LEROY WATKINS, SHEILA LAMERS AND SHE. [LAUGHTER] OF 1903 SAN DIEGO AVENUE NORTH, FORT PIERCE 34946.

THE VIOLATIONS OF THE PROPERTY WERE FOR THE BUILDING CODE SECTION 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED. THIS MATTER CAME BEFORE YOU

[00:10:02]

SHORTLY AFTER THE FINES BEGAN, IT CAME BEFORE YOU FOR A MASSEY HEARING IN THE FINES WERE STOPPED TEMPORARILY TO ALLOW FOR THE CASE TO COMPLY. AS OF NOVEMBER 10, 2021, WHICH IS WHEN THE FINES WERE STOPPED, THE FINES ACCUMULATED TO A TOTAL OF $7040. $40 BEING RECORDING FEES.

THE CASE HAS NOW COMPLIED. THERE ARE THREE CRITERIA IN CONSIDERING THE REDUCTION OF THE FINES.

ONE, THE GRAVITY OR SERIOUSNESS OF THE VIOLATION IS MINIMAL.

ANY AND ALL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE VIOLATOR TO COLLECT THE VIOLATIONS OR THE VIOLATIONS WERE NOT CORRECTED WILL ACTUALLY TAKEN THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS WERE REMOVED AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHEDS EDS WAS -- BY EITHER THE ENFORCEMENT BOARDS, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE OR OTHER QUASIJUDICIAL OR JUDICIAL PROCESS OR OTHERWISE ADMITTED GUILT ON ANY SUCH PROCEEDING WAS WHEN PREVIOUS.

STAFF HAS CALCULATED THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THIS CASE AS BEING 1000 $481,549.68. THE REQUEST IS THAT THE FUND BE REDUCED TO $1000. BASED ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS THAT HAVE BEEN CALCULATED.

$1000 IS A LITTLE LESS THE NET AND THE STAFF IS AGREEABLE TO

THE REDUCTION OF $1000. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?

>> NOT AT THIS TIME. >> SIR, STATE YOUR NAME.

>> LEROY WATKINS THE THIRD. >> ARE YOU AGREEING TO THE

$1000 REDUCTION? >> YES, MA'AM.

>> OKAY. AND BASED ON THE STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES, I MORE REDUCE THE LIEN TO $1000.

>> THIS IS A FINE AND FOR CLARITY, THE ORDER IF WE COULD STATE HOW MANY DAYS HE HAS TO PAY AND IF IT ISN'T PAID --

>> HOW MUCH TIME YOU NEED TO PAY THE $1000?

>> A COUPLE OF MONTHS WOULD BE FINE, 60 DAYS.

QUICKLY WILL GIVE THEM 60 DAYS FROM TODAY'S DATE TO PAY THE FINES AND IF YOU HAVE PROBLEMS --

[F. 21-2357 305 S 24th Street FL Conference Association Seventh Day Adventists Logan Winn ]

>> WE WILL TRY OUR CASE AT 23 507305 S. 24TH ST. THE FLORIDA CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS ARE THE OWNERS AND THIS INDIVIDUAL NEEDS AN INTERPRETER.

SO WE WILL HAVE TO CALL THE INTERPRETATION SERVICE.

>> FIRE TRYING TO GET THE -- YOU'RE GOING TO CALL THE INTERPRETER SERVICE? ALL RIGHT.

[00:15:57]

. >> GOOD MORNING.

I AM FRAN ROSS. I'M GOING TO START THE CASES

RIGHT NOW. >> I AM LOGAN WHEN INSPECTOR/INVESTIGATOR FOR THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE.

>> MET (ROLL. >> CASE 21 Ã357.

THE ADDRESS IS 305 S. 24TH ST. THE CASE WAS INITIATED SEPTEMBER 21, 2021. THE OWNER IS FLORIDA CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS.

THE ADDRESS IS (ROLL CALLED) THE OWNER WAS FLORIDA CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION SEVENTH-DAY Y ADVENTISTS.

AN ADDRESS IS 351 S. STATE RD. 434.

ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FLORIDA. 32714.

VIOLATION WAS FPC10 5.1, PERMIT REQUIRED.

CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR APPLYING STUCCO TO THE BUILDING WITHOUT A PERMIT. I DO HAVE SOME PICTURES.

>> HAS THE RESPONDENT SEEN THOSE PHOTOS? DID THE PHOTOS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE BUILDING

AS YOU OBSERVE THE VIOLATIONS? >> YES, MA'AM.

AT THIS TIME THE CITY WILL MOVE INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE EXHIBIT

1 THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS

SUCH. >> THERE'S NO PERMIT AT THIS

[00:20:03]

TIME. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?

>> NO, MA'AM. >> STATE YOUR NAME.

>> COSS. >> AND HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO

THE POND TO THE ALLEGATIONS? >> IN SEPTEMBER (ROWE DIDN'T KN WE NEEDED D A PERMIT FOR THE STUCCO.

>> AS SOON AS WE KNEW ABOUT THE VIOLATION WE LOOK FOR A CONTRACTOR TO GET THE PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR IS IN THE CITY AND HE GOT THE DOCUMENTS. AND THE DOCUMENTS WERE SENT AND THEY WERE FILLED IN AND SIGNED AND SENT TO THE CITY.

BUT AFTER THAT, THEY TOLD US THAT THE DOCUMENTS SENT WEREN'T THE RIGHT ONES. AND HERE I HAVE THE DOCUMENTS SIGNED THAT THE APPLICATION WAS SENT TO ME.

THESE WERE THE ONES THAT WERE SENT TO THE CITY.

TO APPLY FOR THE PERMIT. SO THEY CAME TO THE CITY AND THEY GAVE ME THE RIGHT ONE. NOW THE DOCUMENTER HAD THE RIGHT -- CONTRACTOR HAD THE RIGHT DOCUMENTS TO KEEP WORKING ON THE PROJECT. THAT'S HAT I HAVE SAVED.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

DO WE HAVE A NEW PERMIT ON FILE?

>> I BELIEVE SO. MY NOTES SURE THERE'S NO PERMIT SUBMITTED AND IT'S AN INCORRECT APPLICATION, LIKE YOU

REFERENCED. >> ANYTHING FURTHER? THEN BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 305 S. 24TH ST., FORT PIERCE, FL.

YOU HAVE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT

[00:25:08]

YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL THIS POSITION.

ANY QUESTIONS? GOOD LUCK.

[J. 21-2803 1305 Delaware Avenue Lareste, Justin Logan Winn]

JUSTIN LARESTE IS THE OWNER. >> WHEN YOU ARE READY, MADAM

CLERK. >> CASE 21 ÃFEBRUARY 8, 2003.

1305 DELAWARE AVENUE JUSTIN LARESTE IS THE >> THE CASE WAS INITIATED OCTOBER 18, 2021. THE OWNER IS JUSTIN LARESTE OF 1110 COLONIAL RD., FORT PIERCE, 34950.

VIOLATION 105.1 2017 PERMIT REQUIRED.

CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR RENOVATIONS BEING DONE INCLUDING ROOF AND RAFTERS WITHOUT A PERMIT.

I DO HAVE SOME PICTURES THAT I HAVE TAKEN OF THE PROPERTY.

>> HAS THE RESPONDENT SEEN THOSE PHOTOGRAPHS?

>> MRI. IT'S OKAY.

>> TO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION AS YOU OBSERVE IT? THE CITY WOULD MOVE INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1 THE PHOTOGRAPHS.

>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.

ANYTHING FURTHER? SIR, STATE YOUR NAME.

>> (INDISCERNIBLE). >> AND WHAT YOUR RELATIONSHIP

TO THE PROPERTY? >> IS MY GRANDDADDY'S PROPERTY.

>> OKAY. YOU'RE HERE REPRESENTING YOUR

GRANDFATHER? >> YES.

>> HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE ALLEGATIONS?

>> THEY CAUGHT ME PUTTING THE RAFTERS AND ON THE ROOF WAS LEAKING. I WAS JUST TRYING TO COVER UP THE WATER THING BUT THEY CAUGHT ME PUTTING IN THE RAFTERS AND I JUST HAVE TO GET A PERMIT. THAT'S IT.

>> HAVE YOU APPLIED FOR A PERMIT?

>> NOT YET BECAUSE I HAVE THREE OR FOUR DIFFERENT PERMITS I'M WORKING ON IN THE OFFICE ALREADY.

GOT TO MOVE THEM ONE AT A TIME. >> BUT YOU KNEW YOU NEEDED A PERMIT WHEN YOU STARTED TO WORK, RIGHT?

>> I DIDN'T THINK I NEEDED A PERMIT UNTIL THE MAGNITUDE OF THE SCOPE OF THE WORK ONTO THAT LEVEL.

IN ONE SECOND TO THAT LEVEL, AS I KNOW I'M GOING TO NEED A PERMIT AND THEY PULLED UP ON IT AND I SAID I WAS JUST GOING TO HAVE TO PAY A DOUBLE PERMIT FEE I WASN'T INTENDING ON PUTTING RAFTERS AND AND I QUICKLY MADE A QUICK CALL TO HURRY UP AND

GET IT BUTTONED UP. >> HAVE YOU APPLIED FOR THE

PERMIT? >> NO, MA'AM.

I HAVEN'T APPLIED FOR ONE YET BECAUSE I HAVE THREE OR FOUR SITUATIONS IN THE OFFICE THAT'S GOING WHEN ALREADY I NEED TO COMPLETE THEM BEFORE I CAN MOVE ON TO THE NEXT.

>> IS THERE A STOP -- WORK ORDER ON THE PROPERTY?

>> YES, MA'AM. >> HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU THINK YOU NEED TO GET A PERMIT FOR THIS PROPERTY?

>> NOT TOO MUCH TIME, BUT JUST SAY 30/60 DAYS.

[00:30:03]

>> MADAM SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, I BELIEVE THE OTHER BUILDING IS A ROOF. IS THAT CORRECT, THAT HE IS

WORKING ON? >> YES.

>> AND DOES THIS OWNER HAVE PREVIOUS VIOLATIONS THROUGH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SO AT THIS TIME, GIVEN THE FACT THAT IT'S CLEAR THEY KNEW THEY NEED AN EXPERIMENT -- GETTING A PERMIT

DID YOU. >> I DIDN'T KNOW I NEEDED A PERMIT. I WAS -- ONCE IT GOT TO THAT MAGNITUDE THEN I SAID I KNOW WE ARE GOING TO NEED PERMIT QUICK LET HER FINISH BEFORE YOU INTERRUPT.

>> THE CITY IS ASKING THE VIOLATION BE FOUND AND THAT HE BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO COMPLY OR THE FINES BEGAN.

>> YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH DOCUMENT YOU THINK YOU CAN

START WITHIN 60 DAYS? >> ADVOCATE MY PERMIT TO THE

FINES -- >> ONCE YOU GET THE PERMIT, YOU HAVE SIX MONTHS TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.

>> I WILL CALL FOR A PERMIT LATER ON TODAY.

>> ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING FURTHER?

>> NO, MA'AM. >> I WILL FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 1305 DELAWARE AVENUE AND JUSTIN LARESTE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I WILL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT. REMEMBER, ONCE YOU GET THAT PERMIT YOU HAVE ANOTHER SIX MONTHS TO GET THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. IF YOU RUN INTO ANY PROBLEMS JUST LET THE CITY KNOW AND I WILL WORK WITH YOU.

SO YOU'VE GOT 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS PRESCRIBED NOT REQUIRED TO PERMIT IF NOT I'M GOING TO FIND YOU $100 PER DAY.

SO IF YOU RUN INTO SOME PROBLEMS WORK WITH LOGAN WINN AND THEY WILL WORK WITH YOU. 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.

[K. 21-2867 202 Gardenia Avenue Gilliam, Darryl & Esquivel, Aida Logan Winn]

>> 5K 21- 2867 DARRELL GILLIAM AND I NEED TO ASK WITHOUT ARE THE OW IATED OCTOBER 21, 2021.

THE OWNER IS DARRELL GILLIAM OF 202 GARDENA AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, 34982. VIOLATION IS FPC 105.12 THOUSAND 17. PERMIT REQUIRED.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR ENCLOSING PATIO WITH WINDOWS STUCCO AND ANY OTHER RENOVATIONS WITHOUT A PERMIT.

THERE'S BEEN NO PERMIT SINCE THE CASE WAS INITIATED.

I DO HAVE SOME PICTURES HERE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE WORK THAT

WAS DONE. >> HAS THE RESPONDENT SEEN

THOSE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> I BELIEVE SO.

>> WHEN YOU SHOW THIS TO HER, PLEASE?

>> TO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS HAVE YOU OBSERVE THEM?

>> YES. >> AT THIS TIME THE CITY WOULD MOVE INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE EXHIBIT NUMBER ONE, THE

PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?

>> NO, MA'AM. SIR, STATE YOUR NAME.

>> DARRELL GILLIAM. >> HOW DO YOU RESPOND?

>> WELL, THE FIRST PHOTO THAT HE SHOWED IS FROM 2015.

IT'S A GOOGLE UPLOAD, AND THAT'S NOT WHAT MY HOUSE LIKE WHEN I WENT IN THERE. BUT THE MAGNITUDE OF WHAT'S

[00:35:05]

I DID TAKE OUT THOSE SCREENS AND I PUT WINDOWS IN THERE AND WHEN THEY TOLD ME I NEEDED THE PERMIT, I WENT TO THE BUILDING OFFICE AND I ASKED THEM IF I COULD APPLY FOR A PERMIT AND EXPLAINED I COULD NOT BECAUSE I NEEDED TO HAVE A BLUEPRINT DONE. SO I WENT AND LOOKED INTO GETTING A BLUEPRINT DONE AND THEY SAID THAT A HOMEOWNER COULD DRAW ONE UP, SO I WENT TO DRAWN UP AND I WENT BACK WITH IT AND THEY SAID NO. WE NEED ONE STAMPED BY AN ARCHITECT BECAUSE YOU CAN'T SUBMIT ONE AND I SAID OKAY.

I WENT TO LOOK FOR AN ARCHITECT AND THE ARCHITECT TOLD ME IT WOULD BE $1500 TO PUT A STAMP FOR THE BLUEPRINT SO I WENT BACK TO HIM AND ASKED HIM FOR SOME TIME AND HE GAVE ME A DELAY. I LOST MY JOB IN THAT PERIOD, SO I WAS UNEMPLOYED. I WENT TO CAREER SOURCE AND REGISTERED FOR SCHOOL AND BY THE GRACE OF GOD I GOT MY JOB BACK. SAME JOB I GOT BACK.

SO I GOT A LETTER STATING I HAD TO COME TO COURT BECAUSE I HAD JUST MISSED THE DATE. WHEN I CAME BACK AND TOLD THEM WHAT TO COMPLY AND WENT TO GET THE PERMIT INTO BUT I HAVE TO DO, THEY SAID AT THIS POINT, IT'S TOO LATE.

YOU HAVE TO GO TO THE JUDGE AND TALK TO THE JUDGE ABOUT IT.

SO I WENT ONLINE AND TRY TO FIND AN ARCHITECT OR AN ENGINEER THAT LOOKED MORE AFFORDABLE, AND THAT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. A GUY GAVE ME THE RUNAROUND.

SO NOW I'M HERE TODAY, AND I DON'T MIND COMPLYING WITH WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE. I WENT THERE AND ASKED CAN I JUST TAKE THE WINDOWS BACKUP? BUT THE SCREEN BACKUP? AND THEY SAID NO. AND I SAID, WELL, OKAY.

COULD YOU GIVE ME SOME TIME? WE ARE WAITING TO GET TAXES BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE $1500 TO GIVE AN ARCHITECT.

AND THEY SAID YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE JUDGE.

WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING FOR YOU. I'M IGNORANT TO THE FACT THAT I WASN'T AWARE YOU JUST CAN'T TAKE OUT SCREENS AND PUT WINDOWS UP, SO I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.

AND I WILL COMPLY AND DO WHATEVER YOU DEEM CATEGORIZED TO FIX THIS AND REMEDY IT, AND I JUST WANT TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF TIME. WE ARE WAITING ON TAXES.

WE DON'T HAVE MUCH MONEY. THIS IS OUR FIRST HOUSE ANIMAL IGNORANT TO WHAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE DONE AND WHAT'S NOT.

I DIDN'T HOMESTEADED SO MY TAXES TRIPLED, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW. BUT IF YOU GIVE ME SOME TIME, A COUPLE OF MONTHS UNTIL THE TAXES COME THROUGH I WILL GIVE YOU EVERYTHING THAT YOU NEED. ABOUT A COUPLE OF VIOLATIONS BEFORE AND I'VE TAKEN CARE OF THEM.

>> OKAY. I'M GOING TO CONTINUE THIS FOR 60 DAYS. BUT WITHIN THAT 60 DAY PERIOD YOU NEED TO TRY AND GET YOUR PERMIT AND YOU NEED TO TRY AND DO EVERYTHING THAT THEY ARE ASKING YOU TO DO HERE.

YOU KIND OF PUT YOUR FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH WHEN YOU HAVE HAD OTHER VIOLATIONS. THAT DIDN'T HELP YOU.

BUT THAT'S OKAY. I DO BELIEVE YOU PICKED SOME GOING TO GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO GET THAT PERMIT AND MANY HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THOSE PERMIT CONDITIONS.TAY IN TOUCH WITH THE CITY. THEY WILL WORK WITH YOU.

THEY TRULY WELL. YES, THEY WILL.

I'VE BEEN HERE 15 YEARS, I THINK, AND I KNOW THEY WILL WORK WITH YOU. I WILL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS.

>> ARE HEARING IN MAY HAS BEEN CANCELED.

THAT WOULD BE THE 60 DAYS. >> NEED TO CANCEL HONEY AGAIN?

>> NO. THAT SUMMER WE SPOKE ABOUT.

>> DO YOU WANT TO PUSH IT OUT OR DO YOU SEE WHERE HE IS NEXT

MONTH? >> I SWEAR I WILL COMPLY.

THIS COMMUNAL TIME. >> IF WE COULD DO THE ORDER PROVIDING 90 DAYS I WOULD BE FINE.

>> OKAY.HAT WILL BE JUNE 90 DAYS.

>> IS AT A CONTINUANCE FOR 90 DAYS?> AND CONTINUANCE FOR

90 DAYS. >> YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PERMIT TO DO ALMOST ANYTHING IN A HOUSE NOWADAYS.

[L. 21-3327 507 Wendell Road Calderon, Eleanor Shaun Coss]

NEXT CASE. >> CASE 5L 21 Ã2337 ELEANOR IS

THE OWNER. >> YOU DON'T LOOK LIKE ELEANOR

CULVER ON TWO MAIN. >> I UNDERSTAND.

I HAVE TO GET USED TO THIS. >> THIS IS 21 Ã33274507 THE CASE WAS INITIATED IN THE CASE WAS INITIATED NUMBER 13 2021

[00:40:07]

THAT WAS PERFORMED. >> DID YOU YOURSELF GO OUT AND OBSERVE THE VIOLATIONS AS WELL AS THE PREVIOUS EMPLOYEE?

>> THAT'S CORRECT. I HAVE VERIFIED THESE VIOLATIONS IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICT THE STATE OF THE PHOTOS IS AS IT CURRENTLY IS AS OF YESTERDAY.

>> OKAY. AS THE RESPONDENT SEEN THOSE

PHOTOGRAPHS? >> I DON'T BELIEVE SO.

>> I APOLOGIZE IF YOU SAID THOSE ARE SOME OF THESE ARE PHOTOS AND SOME OF THESE FROM THE PREVIOUS EMPLOYEE? THEY'RE ALL FROM THE PREVIOUS EMPLOYEE? AT THIS TIME THE CITY WOULD MOVE INTO EVIDENCE (ROLL CALLED) THE PHOTOGRAPHS.> ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THIS

WITNESS? >> NOT AT THIS TIME, THANK YOU.

>> AND STATE YOUR NAME. >> HOW DO YOU RESPOND?

>> I GOT A PERMIT TO DO THE ROOF AND PIECES OF FASCIA WAS DAMAGED SO I JUST REPLACE THEM. AND I CALLED FOR AN INSPECTION AND THEY SAID MY INSPECTION WAS FAILED AND I ASKED THEM WHY THEY SAID I NEEDED A FACIA PERMIT.

I DIDN'T WELL YOU SEEM TO BE PROBABLY GOOD AT WHAT YOU DO.

DO KEEP GETTING EP GETTING EMPLOYED.

BUT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND MOST OF THESE THINGS YOU DID YOUR HOUSE NOWADAYS YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PERMIT.

>> I GOT ONE RIGHT HERE. THEY TOLD ME THAT I NEED ANOTHER PERMIT. IN THE SAME THING HAPPENED ON THIS PARTICULAR PERMIT. THERE'S THREE OR FOUR PERMIT I'M WORKING ON THREE OR FOUR DIFFERENT HOUSES ON THE WENT ON THE ROAD I CHANGED THE ROOF AND MAY FAIL INSPECTION SAYING THAT I DID FACIA.SO I HAD PULLED A FACIA PERMIT.

BUT ON THIS ONE, I WASN'T ABLE TO, CONTRACTOR BECAUSE HE WAS SICK OR DIFFERENT THINGS AND I JUST HAVEN'T GOTTEN TO IT.

AND WITH EVERYTHING I'VE GOT GOING ON RUNAROUND, THE CITY

WANTS THINGS DONE RIGHT AWAY. >> THEY DO.

AND THERE'S A REASON WHY THESE RULES ARE IN EFFECT.

PRIMARILY FOR SAFETY OF INHABITANTS.

THAT'S THE PRIMARY. YOU PROBABLY WEREN'T BORN BUT THERE WAS A HURRICANE THAT CAME THROUGH SOUTHEAST DADE COUNTY MANY YEARS AGO. IT DESTROYED AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THE HOUSING CODE AT THAT TIME WAS SUCH THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVE WHAT WE HAVE NOW AND A LOT OF PEOPLE GOT HURT AND LOST A LOT OF HOUSES. SO THERE'S A REASON FOR THE CODE. IT CAN BE A PAIN, TRUST ME.

BUT THERE IS A REASON FOR IT. SO BEFORE YOU START, JUST CALL AND ASK, DO I NEED TO HAVE A PERMIT FOR THIS? YOU MUST BE GOOD AT WHAT YOU DO BECAUSE YOU KEEP GETTING HIRED,

SO THAT'S GOOD. >> I'VE BEEN WORKING ON HOME PROPERTIES. THAT'S ALL I DO.

>> IT DOESN'T MATTER. >> AND DOING WHAT I'M DOING THEY SAY GET A ROOF PERMIT. I DIDN'T KNOW YOU NEEDED ONE FOR FACIA. I'M GOING WITH WHAT I KNOW.

WHEN THEY HIT ME WITH THE FINES I GO AHEAD AND GET THEM FIXED

IN COMPLY. >> BUT BEFORE YOU START JUST CALL THE CITY. I'M TELLING YOU THESE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN IN THAT OFFICE, THEY REALLY WILL WORK WITH YOU.

>> AM VERY FAMILIAR WITH YOUR OFFICE.

[00:45:04]

>> I APOLOGIZE. MAY HAVE MESSED WITH HIS RELATIONSHIP IS TO THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY. IS THIS A FAMILY MEMBER AS

WELL, MS. CALDERON? >> IS A FRIEND.

>> BUT YOU ARE THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR THE PROPERTY AT THIS

POINT? >> ITS UPKEEP.

>> JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE AN ON RECORD.

SINNOTT. >> ALL RIGHT.

ANYTHING FURTHER? >> WHAT DO THEY WANT ME TO DO? GET A FACIA PERMIT? THINK THE LAST PROPERTY, THE SAME THING HAPPENED. WHEN THEY WENT TO DO THE INSPECTION, THEY FAILED -- I DIDN'T HAVE DUTY NOT THE TIME.

I JUST HAD BEEN BUSY. >> ALL RIGHT.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO DO A JOB AND YOU'RE NOT SURE, JUST CALL THE CITY. IT TAKES JUST A PHONE CALL TO

SAY DO I NEED A PERMIT? >> SOMETIMES THINGS CAN BE TEMPTING WHEN YOU'RE READY TO DO SOMETHING YOU'RE READY TO DO IT. BUT I UNDERSTAND.

>> YOU CAN DO THAT OR COME IN HERE AND VISIT ME.

I MEAN, YOU HAVE A NICE PERSONALITY.

>> YOU TOO, MA'AM. >> THANK YOU.

JUST PULL A PERMIT. JUST TO SEE IF YOU NEED ONE.

>> ALL RIGHT. I PULLED THE PERMIT TODAY.

>> IT WAS TOO LATE. >> -- I NEED ANOTHER PERMIT.

>> YOU HAVE TO HAVE ONE FOR EVERYTHING, TRUST ME.

WE ARE HERE EVERY MONTH WITH THESE CASES WHERE PEOPLE JUST DON'T THINK THEY NEED A PERMIT, AND YOU HAVE TO DO THAT.

IT'S FOR THE SAFETY OF THE OWNERS AND THE RESIDENTS.

AT LEAST YOU TRIED. >> I GET UP EVERY DAY AND TRY

AND WORK ON A NEW ME. >> WELL, I'VE BEEN DOING IT FOR A LONG TIME. SO JUST LEARN TO DO IT RIGHT.

>> IS A PROCESS.>> YES, IT IS.

BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS AT 507 WENDELL ROAD AND ELEANOR CALLED RON IS THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY AND REPRESENTED BY DERBY PHILEAS.

GOING TO VE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS OR AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. AT SIX MONTHS.

YOU HAVE SIX MONTHS IF YOU NEED AN EXTENSION YOU JUST COME TO THE CITY AND SAY I NEED MORE TIME AND THEY WILL GRANT THE EXTENSION FOR REASONABLE CAUSE. ALL RIGHT? COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS IN ALL OF THE VIOLATION SUBSCRIBED IN ORDER OR FIND A $100 PER DAY WILL BE UPSET TO DSS. ANY QUESTIONS?

>> NO. I'M GOING TO GET ON THIS ONE I

WALK OUT THE DOOR. >> YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.

[C. 20-2062 3222 S US Hwy 1 Esquivel, Manuel & Candido Shaun Coss ]

>> GOOD LUCK. JUST LEARN TO PULL THE PERMIT.

>> I UNDERSTAND. >> GOOD LUCK.

SONATA WE HAVE 60 20 Ã2062. 3222 S. U.S. HIGHWAY ONE.

>> WHEN YOU ARE READY. >> THIS IS 20 Ã2062.

3222 S. U.S. HIGHWAY ONE. 5548 NORTHWEST. CORDOVA ST.

PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA. VIOLATIONS OF THIS PROPERTY WERE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SECTION 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED.

THIS MATTER CAME BEFORE NOVEMBER 17, 2021, IN ORDER DETERMINE EVALUATION WAS ENTERED ON SEPTEMBER 2, 2021.

A NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME IS RECORDED NUNC PRO TUNC APRIL 17, 2021.N AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE WAS -- AFFIDAVITS OF NONCOMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 2, 2021 AND THE FINES BEGAN. SHORTLY AFTER THE FINES BEGAN, THE PROPERTY OWNERS REMOVED THE STRUCTURE THAT WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT A PERMIT AND AN AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED JANUARY 6, 2022. THE FINES TOTAL OF $12,560 WITH $60 BEING RECORDING FEES. THREE CRITERIA TO CONSIDER IN THE REDUCTION OF FINES. ONE, THE REMEDY OR SERIOUSNESS

[00:50:03]

THIS IS THE WRONG SHEET.HIS ONE HAS A WRONG ATTACHMENT ON IT. THREE CRITERIA THE GRAVITY OR SERIOUSNESS OF THE VIOLATION AS MODERATE IN ANY AND ALL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE VIOLATOR IS IF THEY REMOVE THE PERMITTED WORK AND THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE MATTER WAS PREVIOUSLY FOUND VIOLATION BY EITHER THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARDS BADGES SPECIAL MAGISTRATE OR OTHER JUDICIAL PROCESS.

OR OTHERWISE ADMITTED GUILT IN ANY SUCH PROCEEDING THREE PREVIOUS TIMES. THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN THIS CASE TO BE $1333.80.

AND THE REQUESTERS HAVE REQUESTED THAT THE FINES BE REDUCED TO $1000. SINCE THAT AMOUNT IS CLOSE TO THE MINISTRY OF COSTS, STAFF WILL RECORD -- EXCEPT THAT

REQUEST. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?

>> NOT AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU.

>> AND THERE ARE TWO GENTLEMEN HERE.

TO BOTH OF YOU WANT TO TESTIFY OR WHEN?

>> WE WILL PAY THE $1000 TOWARDS THE FUND.

A LOT OF THIS STUFF TODAY. >> STATE YOUR NAME.

OPERATION MANAGER. >> (INDISCERNIBLE).

MANUEL ESQUIVEL. >> YOU ALL ARE AGREEING TO THE THOUSAND DOLLARS OFFERED BY THE CITY TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER?

>> YES. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS WHERE THE CONTRACTOR TDMA HIRED A CONTRACTOR AND HE DIDN'T PULL THE PERMIT. I KNOW THERE'S MONEY INVOLVED SO WE HAVE AGREED UPON THE $1000.

THAT'S FINE. >> BASED UPON THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, REDUCE THIS AMOUNT TO $1000.

HOW MUCH TIME YOU NEED TO PAY THAT?

>> TODAY. >> WILL GIVE YOU 30 DAYS TO PAY AND THAT'S FINE. JUST TALK TO THESE LADIES OVER HERE AND YOU WILL BE ALL SQUARED AWAY.

GOOD LUCK. ALL RIGHT.

NEXT CASE. >> CASE 20 Ã2422.

[D. 20-2422 1401 N 2nd Street Lotus Asset Management LLC Shaun Coss]

>> THIS IS CASE 20 Ã24224 1401 NORTH 2ND ST. IN THE PROPERTY OWNED BY LOTUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC OF 1401 NORTH 2ND ST., FORT PIERCE. VIOLATION OF THE PROPERTY ARE FOR THE BUILDING CODE SECTION 105.1.

PERMIT REQUIRED.THIS MATTER CAME BEFORE NOVEMBER 17, 2021 IN ORDER DETERMINE EVALUATION WAS ENTERED.

AN EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED ON OCTOBER 25, 2021.

AN AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 2022, STARTING DEFIANCE WHEN THE PERMIT HAD EXPIRED.

THE PERMIT HAS SINCE BEEN RENEWED, THERE WAS AN ENGINEER OF LETTER THAT WAS APPROVED IN LIEU OF SOME OF THE INSPECTIONS, HOWEVER, THE LETTER WAS APPROVED WITH THE CONDITION THAT A FINAL INSPECTION MUST BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY. AND THAT INSPECTION HAS NOT YET BEEN PERFORMED, SO THIS VIOLATION IS STILL ACTIVE.

STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO STOP THE FINES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE LIFE OF THE PERMIT AND ONCE THE CASE HAS BEEN BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE, THIS MATTER CAN COME BACK BEFORE YOU FOR A FINE REDUCTION.

IF THE PERMIT WERE TO EXPIRE AGAIN, STAFF REQUESTS THAT THE FINES BEGAN AT THE DATE OF EXPIRATION.

>> GOOD MORNING. IN YOUR NAME?

>> MY NAME IS JOANNA MOORE DAVIS ON THE PLANT MANAGER.

>> AND YOU ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH STOPPING THE FINES AND YOU ALL ARE WORKING ON GETTING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE?

>> IF YOU CAN PLEASE DO THAT. WE HAVE BEEN HAVING A LOT OF ISSUES. WENDI WINTERS WERE INITIALLY INSTALLED, THE INCORRECT WINDOWS WERE INSTALLED AND THE SHUTTERS WERE GOING TO TAKE ABOUT EIGHT MONTHS TO BE PRODUCED. SO WE THOUGHT THE EASIEST ROUTE WAS TO JUST GET WINDOWS. IT TURNED OUT THAT WE

[00:55:02]

NOW, WE HAVE CONTRACTED A FIRE ALARM COMPANY TO PULL A PERMIT FOR A STROBE LIGHT AND A POST STATION WHICH WE CONTRACTED THEM YESTERDAY. AFTER THAT, WE SHOULD BE READY

FOR FINAL INSPECTION. >> OKAY.

AND WHAT IS THE CITY REQUESTING?

>> TO STOP THE FINES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE LIFE OF THE PERMIT. AND ONCE THE FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN APPROVED THE CASE WILL BE COMPLIED AND WE CAN BRING IT BACK BEFORE YOU FOR A FINE REDUCTION.

>> DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? >> YES, MA'AM.

>> I WILL STOP DEFINES. YOU GET EVERYTHING IN ORDER AND COME BACK BEFORE ME AND WE WILL SEE WHAT WE CAN DO.

>> I BELIEVE MR. COX AND I HAVE BEEN INTERCHANGING EMAILS AND HE'S BEEN GIVING ME GUIDANCE AS TO WHERE TO GO AND WHAT TO DO NEXT. SO MY HOPE IS THAT THE FIRE ALARM -- FELLOW VOLTAGE PERMIT CAN BE APPROVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO WE CAN HAVE THEM COME BY FOR THAT FINAL

INSPECTION. >> MR. COSS IS A GOOD MAN.

YES. HE IS.

ALL RIGHT. GOOD LUCK.

>> JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, ARE THE FINES TO BEGIN IF THE PERMIT DOES EXPIRE PRIOR TO HER OBTAINING THE FINAL INSPECTION?

>> IF THERE IS A PROBLEM, IF THINGS DON'T WORK OUT, COME BACK AND WE WILL SEE WHERE YOU ARE.

IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE TRYING AND SOME OF THIS IS NOT YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. ALL OF THEM ARE BACKLOGGED NOW.

LL OF THEM. WE DO KNOW THAT FROM WORKING HERE. DON'T WORRY ABOUT THAT.

THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> GOOD LUCK TO YOU.

[C. 21-2077 1310 N 13th Street Klean Katt LLC Ed Smith]

>> STAY IN TOUCH WITH MR. COSS, NOW.

>> THANK YOU. HAVE A GREAT DAY.

>> YOU TOO. >> WE HAVE A CALL IN CASE.

21 Ã207 71310 NORTH 13TH ST. CLEAN CAT, LLC IS THE OWNER.

>> IS THIS (INDISCERNIBLE)? SORRY.

I CALLED THE WRONG NUMBER. >> IS THIS (INDISCERNIBLE)?

>> ASKED. >> THIS IS ELIZABETH BUT THE CITY OF FORT HILL'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT YOU ARE AN AUDIO ATTENDANCE AT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ARING.

[01:00:02]

CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY? >> YES, I CAN.

AS YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND SAY YOUR NAME FOR THE

RECORD PLEASE? >> (INDISCERNIBLE) BLACK/WHITE.

>> USE WHEREFROM THE TESTIMONY PROVIDED WILL BE THE TRUTH?

>> YES, MA'AM. >> THE NEXT VOICE YOU WILL HEAR

IS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. >> GOOD MORNING MR. BLACKWOOD.

MY NAME IS FRAN ROSS. ANTI-SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AND

HEARING CASES THIS MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING.

>> GOOD MORNING. >> CASE NUMBER 21 Ã2077.

1310 NORTH 13TH ST.. OWNER'S NAME IS KLEAN KATT LLC.

2421 NORTH U.S. HIGHWAY ONE, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA.

34946, REGISTERED AGENT IS (INDISCERNIBLE) BLACKWOOD.

VIOLATIONS ARE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 501.1, 2017.

PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTION TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE BUILDING, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND OTHER WORK THAT WAS DONE WITHOUT A PPERMIT.

>> CAN YOU STATE THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR US AGAIN? I THINK YOU CONVERTED SOME NUMBERS.

>> FPC10 5.1. 2017.

PERMIT REQUIRED. >> DO YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE VIOLATIONS? DID YOU OBSERVE THEM YOURSELF?

>> YES. >> CAN I CONFIRM A STAFF THAT MR. BLACKWOOD WAS SENT TO PHOTOGRAPHS OR EMAIL?

>> WAS ABLE TO MAKE -- UNABLE TO MAKE CONTACT SO I CANNOT

SEND HIM THE PHOTOS. >> DO WE HAVE THEM DIGITALLY TO WHERE WE CAN SEND THEM TO HIM NOW?

>> WE CAN SEND THEM TO HIM. WHAT WE CAN DO IT -- THAT WOULD

BE A SEAN QUESTION. >> MR. BLACKWOOD, DO YOU HAVE AN EMAIL ADDRESS WE CAN SEND YOU PHOTOGRAPHS TO?

>> YES. IT WOULD BE MY FIRST NAME

KADNILBH@YAHOO.COM. >> I WAS SEEING IF IT WAS.

GOING TO MOVE THEM IN BUT WAIT FOR YOU TO ACCEPT IT UNTIL HE HAS A CHANCE TO SEE THEM. MR. SMITH, DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU OBSERVE

THEM? >> YES.

>> WE WILL SEEK TO MOVE THE MAN ASKED THE CITY'S EXHIBIT 1 ONCE MR. BLACKWOOD HAS A CHANCE TO REVIEW THEM.

>> I WILL CHECK NOW. >> MR. SMITH, ANYTHING ELSE THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE NEEDS TO KNOW FOR THIS CASE?

>> AS OF RIGHT NOW, THERE ARE NO PERMITS WERE PULLED FOR THE

VIOLATIONS. >> CAN I SPEAK?

>> HOLD ON. WE WANT TO SHOW YOU THE

PHOTOGRAPHS. >> I HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANYTHING

YET. >> MR. COSS IS HERE.

WE ARE GOING TO SEND THEM TO YOU IN A FEW MINUTES.> OKAY.

[01:06:14]

>> MR. BLACKWOOD, THEY'VE BEEN EMAILED TO YOU IF YOU CAN CHECK

YOUR EMAIL, PLEASE. >> OKAY.

I RECEIVED THEM. >> THE CITY WOULD SEEK TO MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS AND AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.

>> ANYTHING FURTHER, MR. SMITH? >> THERE WERE THESE PICTURES AND THEY WERE BASICALLY -- THIS LOOKS LIKE I'VE HAD TWO PLUMBERS COME OUT TO CHECK ON THE ISSUE.

I REACHED OUT TO THE CITY COUNSELOR AND HAVE BEEN WAITING ON A LIST OF PLUMBERS THAT CAN GET A TON.

I HAVEN'T HAD ANYONE LIVING THERE.

MR. BLACKWOOD. WHEN DID YOU ACQUIRE THE

PROPERTY? >> I'M NOT SURE THE EXACT DATE.

LET ME CHECK. I BELIEVE IT'S SEPTEMBER.

I'M NOT 100 PERCENT SURE. >> HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?> SO

[01:10:16]

>> ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S WEBSITE, YES, SIR.

THAT'S WHEN YOU OBTAINED OWNERSHIP OF THIS PROPERTY.

FROM WHAT WE FIND. DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SHOW

OTHERWISE? >> TO SHOW OTHERWISE AND WHEN I ACQUIRED THE PROPERTY? I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK THROUGH PAPERWORK FROM WHEN I SIGNED IT BECAUSE I KNOW THE FIRST TIME SHE SENT OVER THE PAPERWORK AND I TRIED TO ACT ON IF THEY TOLD ME IT WAS NOT IN MY NAME AS OF YET AND THEY STILL HAD TO FINISH OTHER PROCESSES TO GET IT FULLY SIGNED OVER TO ME.

I STARTED THE PROCESS WITH HER PROBABLY AROUND THAT TIME BUT IT TOOK SOME TIME BECAUSE ON HER AND SHE WAS TELLING THE PAPERWORK SOME OF THE PAPERWORK WASN'T SIGNED OR FILED

PROPERLY. >> WHEN DID YOU TAKE POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY? WAS IT IN APRIL WHEN HE STARTED

THE PAPERWORK? >> I AM HONESTLY NOT SURE.

I DIDN'T START WORKING ON THE PROPERTY OR WASN'T AWARE OF ANY VIOLATIONS UNTIL AFTER THE FACT.

>> I -- >> LONG STORY SHORT, I HAVE BEEN TRYING. THERE HAVE BEEN PERMITS THAT I HAD PULLED THAT SHE HAD PULLED WORKING WITH HER TO GET THE ROOFS FIXED THEM ELECTRICAL AND HONESTLY, THE MAIN PART RIGHT NOW IS PLUMBING RENT WHICH IS TAPPING THE INTERIOR WORK.

IN THE TWO PERMITS I'VE HAD UP THERE, THEY HONESTLY TOLD ME THERE'S NOTHING THEY CAN DO BECAUSE THEY ARE UNDERSTAFFED.

I'M NOT SURE IF IT'S BECAUSE THEY HAD PEOPLE LAID OFF FOR CORONA. I HAD PROFANITY PEOPLE, AND THEY BASICALLY CAN HELP YOU. I REACHED OUT TO THE CITY AND I'VE BEEN TRYING. I REALLY JUST NEED MORE TIME AND IS NOT SOMETHING I'VE BEEN TRYING TO AVOID.

THE OUTSIDE OF THE HOUSE HAS BEEN CLEANED UP SO IT LOOKS UP TO PART WITH BUILDING AND SERVING COLD SODAS LOOK RUN DOWN THE OUTSIDE. ALL THE DEBRIS HAS BEEN CLEANED UP AND MOVED. AND THE MAIN PROBLEM NOW IS JUST THE PLUMBING, GETTING THE PERMIT FOR THE PLUMBING.

I CAN GET THE COMPANY NAME THAT I HAD COME AFTER BUT OTHER THAN THAT I JUST NEED MORE TIME TO GET IT.

IF YOU GUYS COULD HELPED ME BUT THE PLUMBER THAT COULD HELPED ME GET THE PERMIT PULLED SO I CAN RESOLVE THIS SO I WOULDN'T BE IN CONTEMPT OF ANY VIOLATION.

I'M AWARE OF THE PROBLEM. I'VE BEEN TRYING.

>> DO WE HAVE A LIST OF PLUMBERS THAT WE PROVIDE?

>> THE LIST CAN BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE.

I BELIEVE THAT MAY BE WHAT HE IS ALREADY RECEIVED.

UNFORTUNATELY, WE CAN'T RECOMMEND ANY PLUMBERS IN PARTICULAR, BUT YOU MAY WANT TO CONTACT THE TREASURE COAST BUILDERS ASSOCIATION AND THEY CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH A LIST OF

LOCAL PLUMBERS. >> OKAY.

AND IS ALSO OKAY IF I CAN GET THE GENTLEMAN WHO I WAS SPEAKING TO SO HE CAN ASSIST ME TRYING TO LOCATE SOMEONE THAT COULD HELP RESOLVE THE ISSUE? AND I'M JUST WAITING ON THE EMAIL FROM THE CLERK WHO TOLD ME THEY WOULD PROVIDE A LIST.

THEY COULDN'T JUST GIVE ME A LIST.

>> EITHER THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE LIST OR THE TREASURE COAST BUILDERS ASSOCIATION. UNFORTUNATELY I CAN GIVE YOU MY INFORMATION BUT I'M NOT ABLE TO RECOMMEND ANY PLUMBERS.

IT WOULD BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST SINCE WE HAVE REASON

-- REVIEWED THE PLANS. >> THAT'S FINE BUT I ALSO TAKE IT THAT WAY I CAN KEEP IN CONTACT WITH YOU AND KEEP YOU

UPDATED ON WHAT'S GOING ON. >> YOU COULD GET EITHER MR. SMITH OR MISS PAT UPDATED BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES

HANDLING THIS. >> I BELIEVE THIS POINT IS A RECOMMENDATION STILL THE SAME VIOLATION BE FOUND THAT HE BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT OR FINES WILL BEGAN?

MR. SMITH IS NODDING YES AT ME. >> YES.

[01:15:05]

>> OKAY. >> ANYTHING --

>> YOU SEE THEY DID THE ELECTORAL WORK ELECTRICAL WORK.

I WOULD NEED TO SEE WHAT WAS DONE TO EITHER COMPLY AS FAR AS THE ELECTRICAL PORTION OF THE VIOLATIONS, JUST TO SEE IF THEY WERE COMPLIED WITH OR WHAT PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED.

I WOULD NEED TO DO A REINSPECTION OF THE PROPERTY TO

ENSURE THAT THAT WAS COMPLIED. >> OKAY.

>> ANYTHING FURTHER? THEN BASED ON EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 1310 NORTH 13TH ST. AND KLEAN KATT LLC'S REGISTERED AGENT IS BLACKWOOD IS THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY.

I'LL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN

[D. 21-2153 2707 Dunbar Street Sirmons, Denise Logan Winn]

YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. ANY QUESTIONS?

>> NO, THANK YOU. >> GOOD LUCK TO YOU.

>> NOW WE WILL CALL MS. SIMMONS.

>> IN THIS CASE WAS CONTINUED FROM LAST MONTH, SO SHE SAW THE PHOTOS LAST MONTH. SO THAT'S CASE 5D.

21 Ã2153, 2707 DUNBAR STREET AND DENISE SIMMONS IS THE

OWNER. >> MS. SIMMONS?

>> DENISE SIMMONS. >> THIS IS ELIZABETH WITH THE CITY OF FORT POLK PIERCE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.

YOU ARE IN AUDIO ATTENDANCE OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING.

AND I NEED TO SWEAR YOU IN FOR TESTIMONY.

OKAY. IF YOU COULD RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.

>> DENISE SIMMONS. >> VIA SWEAR OR FROM THE TESTIMONY PROVIDED WILL BE THE TRUTH?

>> YES. >> AND THE NEXT VOICE YOU WILL

HEAR IS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. >> GOOD MORNING.

YOU WILL NOW HEAR FROM MR. LOGAN WHEN.

>> CASE 21 Ã2153, FEBRUARY 7, THE OWNER IS DENISE SIMMONSVIOLATION SBC 105.1, 2017.

PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTION TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR REPLACING WINDOWS, FRONT DOOR AND ENCLOSURE OF THE WINDOW WITHOUT A PERMIT. PERMIT HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR.

>> WE ARE WAITING ON THE PERMIT TO BE GRANTED OR?

>> SURE. WAS IT REJECTED?

>> SHE JUST REALIZED THERE'S SOMETHING ADDITIONAL THAT'S NEEDED TO GET THE PERMIT AND SHE WAS JUST MADE AWARE THAT, SO SHE'S TRYING TO GET THAT ACCOMPLISHED AS WELL.

>> OTHER THAN THAT, SHE'S DONE EVERYTHING SHE NEEDED?

>> SHE'S APPLIED FOR THE PERMIT FOR THE WINDOWS AND JUST REALIZED SHE NEEDED A DRAWING FOR THE WINDOW THAT SHE BLOCKED

IN AND ENCLOSED. >> OKAY.

>> MS. SIMMONS, I UNDERSTAND YOU'VE APPLIED FOR THE PERMIT.

I'M GOING TO CONTINUE THIS AGAIN.

SO YOU CAN GET THAT PERMIT BASICALLY APPROVED.

IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE TRYING. SO DO YOU THINK YOU CAN HAVE IT

DONE WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS? >> THE ARCHITECT IS TAKING LONGER -- I TRIED TO GET THE ARCHITECT TO COME OUT AND I GUESS THERE IS A WAITING LIST, SO I CAN TO 30 IF IT'S 30, BUT I WAS WONDERING IF I CAN HAVE 60 TO MAKE SURE I HAVE IT DONE.

>> I WILL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS IN LIGHT OF WHAT WE KNOW IS GOING

[01:20:02]

I WILL CONTINUE THIS FOR 60 DAYS.

>> WE DON'T HAVE A MAGISTRATE IN 60 DAYS.

>> IT WOULD NEED TO BE THE 30 OR THE 90.

>> I HATE TO HAVE HER KEEP COMING IN HERE EVERY MONTH BECAUSE SHE WAS HERE LAST MONTH.

I WILL GIVE HER THE 90 DAYS. HOPEFULLY YOU CAN GET EVERYTHING DONE INSOFAR AS THE PERMITS ARE CONCERNED AND THEN AFTER YOU GET THE PERMIT YOU HAVE TO COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT

CONDITIONS. >> CORRECT.ND ALSO, THE LAST THING IS MY ADDRESS, I DID GO TO THE FOURTH FLOOR AND I GOT IT CHANGED. SO IT IS NOT 10071.

IT'S 2707 DUNBAR. IT'S THE ADDRESS OF THE

PROPERTY. >> ME GOT IT.HANK YOU.

AND STAY IN TOUCH. IF YOU GET EVERYTHING DONE THAT YOU NEED TO DO LET THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOW AND IN THIS CASE

WILL GO AWAY. >> THANK YOU.

I APPRECIATE IT. >> YOU'RE WELCOME.

[I. 21-2669 1612 G Terrace Gaskin, Jr., Thomas Shaun Coss]

>> THANK YOU. >> WE HAVE ONE MORE: CASE.

AND HE WAS EMAILED THE PHOTOS YESTERDAY.

IT IS 5I, CASE 21 Ã2669. THOMAS GASKIN JUNIOR IS THE

OWNER. >> THIS IS TOM.

>> THIS IS ELIZABETH WITH THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE BUILDING

DEPARTMENT. >> YES, ELIZABETH.

>> YOU ARE IN AUDIO ATTENDANCE OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING AND I WILL NEED TO SWEAR YOU IN FOR TESTIMONY.

ARE YOU ABLE TO RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND?

>> YES, I AM. >> COULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME

FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE? >> THOMAS GASKIN, JUNIOR.

>> DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU PROVIDE WILL

BE THE TRUTH? >> ASKED.

>> THANK YOU. AND THE NEXT VOICE YOU HEAR

WILL BE THE MAGISTRATE. >> GOOD MORNING, MR. GASKINS.

>> GOOD MORNING. OKAY.

YOU ARE NOW DDE WILL NOW HEAR FROM THE CITY, MR. SHAUN COSS

WILL PRESENT YOUR CASE. >> THIS IS CASE 21 Ã-- THAT'S NOT IT. THIS IS CASE 21-266-9416 12 G TER. AND THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY THOMAS GASKIN JUNIOR IN DAYTONA. 32114.

THIS CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 8, 2021.

IN VIOLATION IS THAT THE PROPERTY ARE FOR THE BUILDING CODE SECTION 105.1. PERMIT REQUIRED. PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR RENOVATING THE STRUCTURES INCLUDING BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, AND DEMOLITION WITHOUT A PERMIT.

SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, THE RESPONDENT HAS APPLIED FOR A PERMIT, AND THE PERMITS ARE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE THAT THEY ARE ADMITTING TO THE VIOLATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN PERFORMED AT THE HOUSE, SO I BELIEVE AT THIS TIME STAFF'S REQUEST IS WE PROVIDE THEM 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMITS OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY AND THE PERMITS THAT WERE SUBMITTED WERE REJECTED FOR INSUFFICIENT DETAILS, SOME REVISIONS DO NEED TO BE MADE BEFORE THE PERMITS CAN BE REVIEWED AGAIN.

>> OKAY. ANYTHING FURTHER?

>> NOT AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU.

>> MR. GASKIN, HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THAT?

YOU DON'T HAVE TO. >> YES.

I JUST RECEIVED THE NOTICE OF THE REJECTION THAT WAS APPARENTLY EMAILED TO ME ON THE SEVENTH.

SO I AM IN THE PROCESS OF MAKING THE NECESSARY PROVISIONS AND SENDING THEM THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUESTED.

WHAT'S BEING REQUESTED IS MY PLANS BE UPDATED TO DESIGN

[01:25:01]

SO WHEN THE INSPECTOR CAME, I WAS NOT AWARE THAT MY PLUMBER HAD MY -- HAD NOT APPLIED FOR PERMIT.

THE PLUMBER DID WELL AS ELECTRI PERMIT TO REMOVE MY WATER HEATER. BUT SUBSEQUENTLY TO ALL OF THAT, I WENT OUT AND PURCHASED -- AND ENGINEERED SUBMITTED PLANS AND THAT WAS ABOUT THREE WEEKS AGO.

AND I JUST RECENTLY RECEIVED THE LETTER BY EMAIL FROM SHAUN COSS. SO ANYWAY, THE PROCESS THAT I'M GOING TO BE RESUBMITTING THE ADDITIONAL REQUIRED INFORMATION

FOR APPROVAL BACK TO THE CITY. >> AND HOW SOON DO YOU THINK

YOU CAN DO THAT? >> I AM HOPING TO DO THAT WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS. AT THIS POINT IN TIME THERE'S NO ADDITIONAL WORK OR ANYTHING BEING DONE AT THE HOUSE, BUT BASICALLY, SOME OF THIS IS A MATTER OF MY ARCHITECTURE ENGINEER UPDATING HIS SOFTWARE FROM HIS SIXTH ADDITION TO HIS SEVENTH EDITION. I HAVE THE PRODUCT APPROVALS AND AMEND THE PROCESS OF GETTING ELECTRICAL LOAD CALCULATIONS BACK SO I CAN RESUBMIT THIS BACK AND ALSO A

LAYOUT THEY ARE REQUESTING. >> HOW SOON DO YOU THINK YOU

CAN GET THAT DONE? >> WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS.

>> I'M GOING TO CONTINUE THIS FOR THE NEXT 30 DAYS.

>> I DON'T THINK 30 DAYS WOULD BE ENOUGH.

THE TERM IN VIOLATION PROVIDE 60 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF

$100 PER DAY. >> I DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT.

YOU DON'T THINK I CAN GET THIS RESOLVED IN 60 DAYS?

>> I DON'T BELIEVE YOU CAN GET NEW ENGINEERED DRAWINGS AND ENERGY COLLECTS, ELECTRICAL LOAD COUNTS WITHIN 30 DAYS.

THAT WOULD BE GREAT IF YOU CAN BUT JUST BASED OFF OF THE FEEDBACK I'M HEARING FROM CONTRACTORS ON A DAILY BASIS, THAT DOESN'T REALLY SOUND REASONABLE.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO COMPLY WITH THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE'S ORDER. MY RECOMMENDATION IS TO PROVIDE YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY IF THE PERMIT IS NOT OBTAINED WITHIN 60 DAYS.> THAT'S FINE WITH ME BUT MY GOAL IS TO GET BACK TO YOU WITHIN 30 DAYS. BUT I WOULD BE MOST GENEROUS IF THE MAGISTRATE TO GIVE ME THE 60 DAYS.

>> THEM BASED ON THE STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THOMAS GASKIN JUNIOR, THE RESPONSIBLE PARTY I WILL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, AT LEAST 100 EVERY -- ANCHOVY (ROLL CALLED) AND CAROL OF THE OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BSS. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.

THANK YOU. >> WE HAVE THE CASES THAT ARE

[A. 21-1145 608 Palm Avenue Martin County Properties LLC Logan Winn]

CASE 21 Ã11 405608 PALM AVENUE SEPTEMBER 8, 2021.

THE OWNER IS MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTIES, LLC OF 265 BERMUDA BEACH DOCTOR, FORT PIERCE, FL. 34949.

VIOLATIONS FPC 105.1, 2017 PERMIT REQUIRED.

I PMC 304.13.2. 2021 OPENABLE WINDOWS.

I PMC, 304.1, 2021. WINDOWS, DOORS AND FRAMES.

I PMC 605.1, 2018. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.

I PMC, THREE OF 5.3, 2021, INTERIOR SERVICES I PMC 2021.

[01:30:04]

2021 STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. ORRECTIVE ACTIONS.

REPAIR OR REPLACE WINDOWS THAT ARE NOT OPENABLE OR WEATHERTIGHT. MAKE SAFE AND COVER EXPOSED ELECTRICAL WIRES IN THE BATHROOM.

OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE CARPORT ROOF RAFTERS THAT WERE REPAIRED/REPLACED WITHOUT A PERMIT MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO THE CEILING THAT'S WATER DAMAGE DUE TO THE ROOF LEAK.

PICTURES OF THE PROPERTY. >> TODAY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU OBSERVE THEM? AT THIS TIME THE CITY WOULD REVERT TO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE

EXHIBIT 1 IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?

>> THEY DID HAVE A PERMIT ISSUED FOR THE WINDOW REPLACEMENT ONLY AND THAT WAS ALL.

>> MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTIES IS NOT REPRESENTED HERE THIS MORNING. THERE'S NOT AN AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE SO BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION DOES EXIST AT 608 PALM AVENUE. I WOULD GIVE THEM 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSTRUCTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED AND HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.

[E. 21-2239 1706 Avenue D Florida Paraguay Real Estate LLC Ed Smith]

>> THE NEXT CASE FYVIE. 21 Ã22 391706 AVENUE D.

FLORIDA PARAGUAY REAL ESTATE LLC IS THE OWNER.

>> WHEN YOU'RE READY. >> WE HAVE CASE NUMBER 21 2239.

1706 AVENUE D. FLORIDA PARAGUAY REAL ESTATE, LLC.

CASE INITIATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2021.

REGISTERED AGENT IS MANAGEMENT, LLC.

2400 PRESIDENTIAL WAY, SUITE 1905, WEST PALM BEACH.

OWNER IS FLORIDA PARAGUAY REAL ESTATE, LLC.

1615 FORUM PLACE, SUITE 38, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA.

33401. VIOLATIONS ARE I PMC 304.1.8.

2021. UNSAFE CONDITIONS.

ROOF. I PMC 304.

ROOF AND DRAINAGE.I PMC 305.3.

2021 INTERIOR SURFACES. I PMC 605.1.

2018. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.

I PMC AT 605.4. 2021.

WIRING. THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IS TO REPAIR OR REPLACE ROOF THAT IS LEAKING, REPAIR CEILING AND WALL WATER DAMAGE FROM ROOF LEAK AND MAKE NECESSARY ELECTRICAL REPAIRS TO NONWORKING OUTLETS AND ELIMINATE AND PROHIBIT THE USE OF EXTENSION CORDS ENTRY

PROPERTY FOR PESTS INFESTATION. >> WHAT IS THE PEST

INFESTATION? >> ROACHES.

>> DID YOU OBSERVE ROACHES YOURSELF?

>> I SAW ROACH DROPPINGS. >> IS THIS A LANDLORD/TENANT DUTY IS AT THE TENANT THAT REPORTED THIS?

>> YES. >> DID THE TENANT INDICATE

THERE WERE ROACHES? >> YES.

>> DO YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY?

>> YES. >> TODAY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY

[01:35:01]

>> YES. >> AT THIS TIME THE CITY WOULD MOVE INTO EVIDENCE AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE THE PHOTOGRAPHS.

>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.

ANYTHING FURTHER?> NO. >> AND I DON'T SEE ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF FLORIDA PARAGUAY REAL ESTATE, LLC.

BASED ON THE EVIDENC AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 1706 AVENUE D AND THAT HE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR. I WILL GIVE HIM 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR $100 A DAY FIND BSS AND 30 DAYS

[G. 21-2566 2011 Valencia Avenue Hamilton, Thomas Jr & Cynthia Clark, Geraldine Logan Winn ]

TO APPEAL. >> 5G 21- 2566.

2011 VALENCIA AVENUE. THOMAS AND CYNTHIA HAMILTON AND GERALDINE CLARK ARE THE END -- OWNERS.

>> CASE NUMBER 21-2566, 2011 VALENCIA AVENUE.

CASE INITIATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021.

OWNER, THOMAS JUNIOR AND CYNTHIA HAMILTON.

GERALDINE CLARK. 2011 VALENCIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA. VIOLATIONS FPC 105.1.

2017. PERMIT REQUIRED.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR WINDOWS REPLACED WITHOUT A PERMIT. I DO HAVE PICTURES.

>> TO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE

PROPERTY? >>.

>> THE LAST STAGES OF THE REVIEW PROCESS.

LET'S MARCH -- THIRD LET'S CONTINUE THIS.

>> DO YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND ACCEPT -- MIGHT HAVE IT.

YOU WANT TO ACCEPT PHOTOGRAPHS AND EVIDENCE OR DO YOU WANT US

TO HOLD ONTO THE CASE? >> 916 NORTH 10TH ST. FS

[H. 21-2582 916 N 10th Street FS Florida Investment Corp Inc Ed Smith]

>> WE HAVE CASE NUMBER 2125 916 NORTH 10TH ST. FS FLORIDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION INCORPORATED IT'S THE OWNER.

ADDRESS 1535 MILLER RD., CORAL GABLES, FL.

33416. REGISTERED AGENT IS CARLA M (INDISCERNIBLE). VIOLATION IS FPC 105.1, 2017, PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTION OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE REMODELING OF THE HOUSE WITHOUT A PERMIT INCLUDING BUILDING, FRAMING ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING AND ANY OTHER RENOVATIONS BEING DONE. THERE'S NO PERMIT SINCE THE

CASE HAS BEEN INITIATED. >> DO YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF

THE VIOLATIONS? >> YES.

>> TODAY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DESCRIBE THE VIOLATIONS? THE CITY WILL MOVE INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1

THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS

SUCH. >> ANYTHING FURTHER, MR. SMITH?

>> NO. HOW DID THIS COME BEFORE CODE?

[01:40:05]

>> I WAS DRIVING BY THE MEMBER OUT THERE WORKING.

>> THIS WILL BE ADMITTED AS CITY'S EXHIBIT 1. THERE BEING NO IN HERE ON BEHALF OF FS FLORIDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION, I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS THE ORGAN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED.

COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND TO ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED AND YOU

HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> CASE 20 Ã1134.

[A. 20-1134 1707 N 13th Street Ft Pierce Empire 1 Holdings LLC Shaun Coss ]

>> 20 Ã1134 OR 1707 NORTH 13TH ST..

SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, THIS CASE HAS RECENTLY COME INTO COMPLIANCE. THE INITIAL REQUEST FOR MSA HEARING WAS TO STOP THE FINES UNTIL THE CASE CAN BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE.O AT THIS POINT, THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THIS BE PULLED FROM CONSIDERATION BECAUSE A HEARING IS NOT NECESSARY SINCE THE FINES HAS STOPPED. A NEW LETTER WILL BE GENERATED TO THE OWNER INDICATING WHAT THE FINES ACCUMULATED TO AND WILL PROVIDE HIM WITH ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST A FINE

REDUCTION HEARING. >> YOUR REQUEST IS GRANTED.

HANK YOU. MADAME CLARK?

>> OKAY. I WANT TO MAKE CLEAR, I PUT THE CASES THAT WERE COMPLIED OR RESCHEDULED IN THE WRONG SPOT ON THE AGENDA. SO I'D LIKE TO CALL THEM OUT.

>> THAT'S FINE. >> CASE 20- 600 AND RETRO WBC COLLECTIONS LP. CASE 21-1931, 711 S. INDIAN RIVER DOCTOR DYLAN AND CHRISTIAN ROYER CASE 22-381, 3821 GLEN COVE WAY. AND CASE 21-2247, 1335 ORANGE AVENUE AND WE ARE ALSO GOING TO MOVE CASE FOR SAINT 19- 3145 40, 60 SALVAS RD. AND BOBBY AND WANDA JOHNSON ARE

THE OWNERS OF THAT. >> THAT WILL BE GRANTED.

ANYTHING FURTHER? HOW ARE THEY NOTIFIED FOR THE

PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT PRESENT? >> NOTICE OF HEARING SENT TO THE VIOLATOR CERTIFIED MAIL AT THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED SIGNED ITS PLACE IN THE FILE OF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED OR UNCLAIMED AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING THE NOTICE OF HEARING ENCLOSED IS MAILED TO THE VIOLATOR.

10 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING A NOTICE OF HEARING WAS THEN SENT REGULAR U.S. MAIL WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ATTACHED TO IT AND A COPY WAS PLACED IN THE FILE.

10 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD WITHIN THE LOBBY OF CITY HALL AND A NOTI

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.