[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:08]
>> IF YOU ARE HERE BECAUSE YOU RECEIVED NOTICE THAT YOUR PROPERTY WAS IN VIOLATION YOU WERE GIVEN A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF CORRECT THAT AND YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO AS OF THIS MORNING.
FOR THOSE THAT WISH TO BE HEARD WE'LL CALL YOUR CASES SHORTLY.
WE'RE BEING RECORDED ON LIVE LOCAL T.V. SO BE MINDFUL OF THAT WHEN YOU COME UP HERE. TWO, DOES ANYBODY NEED AN INTERPRETER? WITH THAT BEING SAID IF YOU DON'T MIND, PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC, FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY
AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.>> ALRIGHT. MADAM CLERK, WHEN YOU ARE READY?
>> OKAY OUR FIRST CASE WILL BE 6A.
17-8981450 BELL AVENUE AND THE OWNERS ARE TS PN 19 L.L.C. AND 1450 BELL AVENUE OWNER LLC.,145 OWNERS ARE TS PN 19 L.L.C. AND 1450 BELL AVENUE OWNER LLC. 145E OWNERS ARE TS PN 19 L.L.C. AND 1450 BELL AVENUE OWNER LLC.PN 1 1450 BELL AVENUE OWNER LLC. WE
[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
NEED TO SWEAR EVERYBODY IN MRS. FRAN?>> ALRIGHT. WOULD EVERYBODY THAT'S GOING TO TESTIFY PLEASE STAND AND BE SWORN IN?
THAT INCLUDES YOU GUYS TOO. >> IF YOU ARE GOING TO TESTIFY
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. >> DO YOU SWEAR OR AFTER OFFICIAL THE TESTIMONY YOU WILL PROVIDE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
[A. 17-898 1450 Bell Avenue TSPN 19 LLC 1450 Bell Ave Owner LLC Shaun Coss]
>> THIS IS 1450 BELL AVENUE. THE PROPERTY IS NOW OWNED BUY THE SBN 19 LC. THE CASE WAS INITIATED APRIL 5TH, WE HAVE THE PREVIOUS OWNER WHO WAS RAIL SIDE LLLC.
THE VIOLATIONS ARE 101 POINT 2 POINT 1 UNSAFE BUILDING.
PERMIT REQUIRED, 5-1 POINT 105.2 EXPIRED PERMIT, 22-2 COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVAL. THIS MATTER CAME BEFORE YOU AUGUST 23RD OF, SORRY, AUGUST 2ND IN A ORDER OF VIOLATION WAS ENTERED AUGUST 3RD, 2017. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE VIOLATIONS HAVE BEEN UPDATED. EITHER IS NOTED AS COMPLIED OR STILL IN VIOLATION. I'LL READ THE ONES STILL IN VIOLATION. APPROVAL AND REVOKABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR THE LANDSCAPE, SORRY, YES FOR THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS OUTSTANDING.
SOME COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR PHASE TWO IS, WELL SOME OF THESE WILL NO LONGER BE APPLICABLE. THE NEW OWNERS HAVE DIFFERENT INTENTION BUT 5A IS TO ALLOW STANDING.
ITEM 5C BUILDING NUMBERINGS, CONSTRUCTION REHABILITATION TO ADDRESS THE CHANGE OF USE AND CURE ALL DEFICIENCIES CAUSING CONDEMNATION AND THE REMOVAL OF MILLIONS IS OUTSTANDING.
THIS MATTER IS HERE BEFORE YOU TODAY FOR A STATUS HEARING AND MASSIE HEARING. THIS CASE STARTED FINES WHEN SPECIAL MAGISTRATE DENIED THE LAST REQUEST FOR EXAMPLE TENSION IS AND ON APRIL 9TH OF THE 2020 A LIEN WAS FILED AND ON SEPTEMBER 17TH, 2017 A LEAN WAS RECORDED WITH THE CIRCUIT COURT.
THE PROPERTY WAS SENT SOLD ON MAY 1TH, 2022.
SO WE HAVE THE NEW OWNERS AND THE REPRESENTATIVES ARE HERE TODAY TO PRESENT YOU WITH THE STATUS OF THE PROPERTY, THEIR INTENTIONS AND THE MASSIE HEARING.
>> AND IF I MAY, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, AT THIS POINT FINES ARE NOT RUNNING. ONE OF THE ISSUES IS WHETHER TO START RUNNING FINES OR WHEN TO EXTEND THEM BACK UNTIL PURSUANT
[00:05:05]
TO THE CIRCUIT COURT ORDER AND, AS WELLS TO HEAR FROM NEW RESPONDENTS SO SHE CAN DETERMINE TO HOLD THE MASSIE HEARING ORCONTINUE FURTHER? >> THAT'S IT, THANK YOU.
>> THAT MAKE SENSE? >> IT IS, BUT I DON'T HAVE A
COPY OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ORDER. >> WE CAN GET THAT FOR YOU.
>> IN THE MEANTIME WE CAN PROCEED IF YOU WOULD LIKE.
>> WOULD YOU LIKE THEM TO PRESENT WHILE WE'RE LOOKING FOR
>> GO AHEAD AND TELL THE MAGISTRATE WHAT YOUR NAMES ARE?
>> I'M, GOOD MORNING I'M THOMAS AND THIS IS MY BROTHER.
I'LL JUST HAND THIS OUT. WE ARE THE NEW OWNERS.
>> HOLD ON. YOU ARE NOT NEAR THE MIC.
>> WE'RE THE NEW OWNERS OF 1450 BELL AVENUE.
WE ACQUIRED THE PROPERTY ABOUT THREE WEEKS AGO.
WE WERE IN DUE DILIGENCE FOR ABOUT FIVE OR SIX MONTHS AND EERYTHING YOU SEE THERE IS PRETTY MUCH WHAT'S BEEN ACCOMPLISHED IN THOSE THREE AND A HALF WEEKS.
WHEN WE FIRST INHERITED THE PROPERTY ALONG WITH THIS INHERITANCE WE HAD A TENANT THAT WENT BANKRUPT IN THE PROPERTY.
HE LEFT 10,000 TONS OF REPSYCH LABELS.
MIXED PAPER. SOME ALUMINUM AND SOME GLASS.
TO CREDIT HE REMOVED SOME, MAYBE LIKE 1500 TONS, BUT WE'VE INHERITED IT AND THESE ARE PICTURES OF WHAT WE'RE DOING EVERY DAY IN THE LAST THREE WEEKS.
WE'VE PROBABLY REMOVED 2000 TONS OF RECYCLABLES AND WE'RE CLEANING UP FOR PROPERTY. WE NEED TO CLEAR IT BECAUSE THERE'S TRASH SITTING AROUND. A LOT OF THE VIOLATIONS ARE EVEN
TOUGH. >> STATE YOUR NAME WHEN YOU
THE RECYCLING PLANT THAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT TORN DOWN STRUCTURAL BEAMS ON THE ROOF AND MADE A PEOPLE WITH CRIBBING AND THEN ONE DAY WHEN IT WAS RAINING THE ENTIRE ROOF COLLAPSED AND FROM THERE HE FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY AND LEFT THIS TRASH
AND THE PROPERTY. >> YEAH, SOLY.
SO NOW WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF GOING THROUGH WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO CLEAR THE PROPERTY. ONCE WE DO SO WE KNOW WE NEED TO GO THROUGH THE PROPER PERMITTING PROCESS FOR THE SITE PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY, BUT FOR THE TIME BEING WITH THE AMOUNT OF TRASH WE HAVE TO FOCUS AT CLEARING IT OUT BECAUSE THERE'S COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF TRASH, AND IF I SHOWED VIDEOS OF WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE YEARS AGO WE HAVE MOVED MOUNTAINS OF TRASH.
LITERALLY. >> THE ROOFING, ALL OF THOSE VIOLATIONS WE HOPE TO GET THROUGH WHEN WE CLEAR PERMITTING. THE VIOLATIONS FOR A ROADWAY ONCE WE'RE TOLD WHAT TO DO WILL HOPEFULLY BE INCLUDED IN WHATEVER SITE PLAN WE PROPOSE. WE DON'T PLAN TO REINVENT THE WHEEL HERE. WE ARE TAKING THIS DAY-BY-DAY.
WE SEE PROMISE AND POTENTIAL UNTIL A PROPERTY, BUT OTHER THAN THAT WE'RE TRYING TO REMOVE TRASH AND MAINTAIN A BUSINESS AND CLEAR WHATEVER VIOLATIONS WE HAVE TO MAKE IT UP-TO-DATE WITH
WHAT YOU WANT IT TO BE ALSO. >> AND NATURALLY, WE BELIEVE THROUGH THE RENOVATION OF THE BUILDINGS WE'RE GOING TO CURE ALL THE VIOLATIONS THROUGH THE PERMITTING PROCESS AND WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AND EVERYTHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING FOR THE NEXT FEW YEARS INVESTING MILLIONS TO BRING THIS PROPERTY TO WHAT WE BELIEVE IT DESERVE WHICH IS IS AN AMAZING INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY IN A GREAT CITY THAT WE THINK WE CAN BRING
WORLD-CLASS TENANTS TOO. >> THE CIVIL ENGINEERS ARE HERE AND THESE ARE ALL PEOPLE THAT WE HAVE RETAINED TO GET TO THAT, RIGHT? WE'VE DONE THAT JUST IN THE LAST
THREE WEEKS. >> WE HAVE MELISSA CORBETT AND MICHAEL MCCARTY AND OUR GC AND ALSO, WHEN WE TOOK ON THE
[00:10:03]
PROPERTY WE ALSO WERE ABLE TO KEEP THREE EMPLOYEES THAT HAD BEEN THERE FOR A YEAR AND A HALF PRIOR THAT WERE HAPPY TO STAY.WE'RE A FAMILY RAN BUSINESS AND WE DRIVE HERE FROM MIAMI FOUR TIMES A WEEK, FIVE HOURS A DAY TO BE HERE BECAUSE WE KNOW THIS IS WHERE OUR FUTURE IS AND BEING A PART OF THIS.
THAT'S REALLY OUR WHOLE THING IN THE LAST THREE WEEKS OF WHAT WE HAVE DONE AND FORESEE FOR THIS PROPER
MR. SHAUN COSS? >> SO I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING THAT WAS SAID AND YOUR INTENTIONS FOR THE PROPERTY.
WHEN DO YOU FORESEE MYING FOR THE FIRST PERMIT?
>> WE'RE THERE DAY IN AND DAY OUT SO WE ANTICIPATE FIVE TO SIX MONTHS THAT WE CAN GET EVERYTHING DONE SURE BUILDING DRAWINGS ARE IN ORDER AND WE KNOW THIS TAKES TIME.
WE'RE PATIENT, BUT WE'RE WORKS A FAST AS WE POSSIBLY CAN.
>> GOOD MORNING. I'M MIKE MCCARTY WITH MCCARTY LAND PLANNING AND DESIGN. WE'RE WORKING WITH THIS GROUP ON THIS PROPERTY DILIGENTLY. WE HAVE SURVEYORS IN THE FIELD TO GATHER. WE WOULD ANTICIPATE SUBMITTAL OF THE APPROPRIATE SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY CODES PERTAINING TO STORM WATER, CIVIL ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS OF THE SITE, LANDSCAPE PLANS, ARCHITECTURALS AND ET CETERA PROBABLY IN THE NEXT 60 DAYS.
I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOU HAVE MERCY FOR THESE GENTLEMEN, AND LET'S WELCOME THEM INTO THE CITY, AND LET'S ALLOW THEM TO PUT PEOPLE TO WORK AND REVITALIZE THIS PROPERTY.
IT'S UNFORTUNATE OF THE HISTORY WITH THE PREVIOUS OWNER IN WHERE WE FIND OURSELVES TO DAY, BUT WE NEED TO PROVE FORWARD IN A PATH TO SUCCESS AND THESE GENTLEMEN ARE HERE FOR THAT.
THANK YOU. >> WHAT ARE YOUR FUTURE PLANS
FOR THE PROPERTY? >> RIGHT NOW WE DON'T KNOW HOW, BUT THE MAIN PLAN IS TO REPUBLICAN RATE THE BUILDINGS
AND REVITALIZE THE PROPERTY. >> WE ALSO - I'M HAPPY TO SPEAK TO THAT. WE'RE IN THE DUE DILIGENCE PHASE OF DETERMINING HOW THE PROPERTY WILL BE REDEVELOPED.
WE'RE IN THAT PHASE OF GATHERING DATA AND WE'LL BE EVALUATING SITE WITH THESE GENTLEMEN AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS, STRUCTURAL ENERGY BY NEARS AND SUCH TO DETERMINE WHAT THE BEST USE IS, BUT OUR TARGET IS TO DO SOMETHING TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY AND PROVIDE JOBS AND TAX SPACE AND FOSTER REDEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA OF THE CITY.
>> AND ONE OF YOU WERE ABOUT TO SAY SOMETHING?
>> I WAS GOING TO SAY THAT WE REALLY ARE TRYING TO TAKE THIS DAY-BY-DAY. IT'S SUCH A HUGE MOUNTAIN TO CLIMB IF I WERE TO LOOK AT THE PEAK I WOULD GET LOST.
EVERY SINGLE DAY THAT WE'RE THERE, IT'S JUST A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF WORK TO EVEN GET TO THE POINT TO GO TO WORK.
I KNOW THAT SOUNDS UNUSUAL, BUT THAT'S ACTUALLY SITUATION.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THE CITY WOULD REQUEST AT THIS TIME THAT WE REMOVE THE PREVIOUS RESPONDENT'S L.L.C. FROM ANY ORDERS MOVING FORWARD AND THAT WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE NEW OWNERS AT 1450 BELL AVENUE AS THE CURRENT RESPONDENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR CURING THIS VIOLATION.
THE CITY IS AGREEABLE TO PROVIDE A 60 DAY EXTENSION FOR THIS MATTER TO ALLOW FOR THE SUBMITTAL OF A SITE PLAN.
THE CITY IS AGREEABLE TO NOT STARTING ANY FINES AT THIS TIME, BUT WE WOULD REQUEST THAT BE PUT IN THE FORM OF AN ORDER SO WE CAN UPDATE THE OFFICIAL OR THE OFFICIAL RECORD.
>> WE'VE RECOGNIZED THE NAME CHANGE, CORRECT? THE NEW OWNERS AND THE CITY IS AMENABLE TO A 60 DAY EXTENSION AS REQUESTED BY THE PARTIES SO YOU CAN GET YOUR PLANS TOGETHER?
>> WE'LL WORKS A FAST AS WE CAN AND AS HARD AS WE CAN.
[00:15:05]
>> ANYTHING ELSE? HOW MANY ACRES IS THIS?
THAT'S BECAUSE I LOOKED AT THE PICTURES AND I WAS LIKE WOW, HOW BIG IS THIS. SO YOU HAVE A LOT TO DO.
THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING YOU. HOW MUCH?
THIS IS NOT TWO OR THREE ACRES. >> NO.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE JUST FOR CLARITY THE SUBMITTAL OF THE PLAN WILL NOT CURE IT, BUT THAT WILL SHOW A GOOD FAITH EFFORT MOVING FORWARD SO AS LONG AS THE CITY HAS RECEIVED THAT IN 60 DAYS THIS MATTER DOES NOT NEED TO COME BACK BEFORE YOU.
YOUR NEXT HEARING ROUGHLY IN 60 DAYS AND WILL BE AUGUST 16TH SO IF WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED THAT SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PRIOR TO THEN, THEN THIS MATTER WILL COME BACK BEFORE YOU AUGUST 16TH.
>> MR. MCCARTY. >> MAY I SPEAK?
>> YES. >> IT APPEARS OUR SURVEY CREWS ARE EXTREMELY BACKED UP ABOUT THREE TO FOUR WEEKS OUT IN COLLECTING THE DATA WE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH SITE PLANNING AN ENGINEERING. WOULD IT BE ACCEPT TO BE ABLE GET A 90 DAY WINDOW TO SUPPLY THAT, PLEASE?
>> I THINK THAT'S APPROPRIATE. >> THANK YOU, MA'AM.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
>> THEN I WILL NUMBER ONE ACCEPT THE NAME CHANGE OF THE ORGANIZATION OR THE BUSINESS AND GRANT YOU A 90 DAY EXTENSION TO COMPLY OR GET TOGETHER, WHATEVER YOU NEED TO DO SO YOU'RE IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY CODE. >> THANK YOU MA'AM.
>> YOU HAVE DONE A LOT OF WORK IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME.
GOOD LUCK. >> APPRECIATE THAT.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
>> YOU HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY. THANK YOU ALL.
[B. 20-850 4815 S US Highway 1 Sutherlin Nissan of Ft. Pierce Shaun Coss]
>> NEXT CASE IS 6B, 20-850, HIGH POINT OF FT PIERCE SECTION 2, SUTHERLIN NISSAN OF FT. PIERCE IS THE OWNER.
THIS IS PART ONE. >> GOOD MORNING.
WHEN YOU ARE READY? >> GOOD MORNING I'M MR. SMITH AN ATTORNEY HERE ON BEHALF OF SUTHERLIN NISSAN OF FT. PIERCE.
>> TIME CIVIL ENGINEER FOR THE PROJECT.
>> MR. SHAUN COSS ARE YOU PRESENTING?
>> YES, MA'AM. I'M PULLING UP THE AGENDA.
THE LAST ONE WAS NOT LOADING. OKAY THIS IS CASE 20-850.
HIGH POINT OF FT PIERCE SECTION 2.
SUTHERLIN NISSAN OF FT. PIERCE. THE VIOLATIONS ARE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, PERMIT REQUIRED AND THIS MATTER CAME BEFORE YOU APRIL 21ST OF 2021 IN AN ORDER DETERMINING A VIOLATION WAS ENTERED. A TIME WAS RECORDED ON JUNE 15TH PROVIDING A 0 DAY EXTENSION. AN AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED IN 2021 AND FINES BEGAN.
ON OCTOBER 20TH, 2021 SPECIAL MAGISTRATE GAVE EXTENSION OF 90 DAYS AND TOPPED THE FINES ON THAT DAY.
AS OF FRIDAY THE RESPONDENTS HAVE SUBMITTED WITH WHAT'S INTENDED TO BE A REVISION. ONCE THE REVISION FEE IS PAID IT WILL BE ROUTEED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW. I WOULD ANTICIPATE A TWO TO THREE WEEK TIMEFRAME BEFORE THEY KNOW IF IT'S APPROVED OR REJECTED IN DISCUSSION BEFORE TO HEARING THEY ASKED I BELIEVE FOR A 90 DAY EXTENSION AND I INDICATED IF THE SITE PLAN WORK PERMIT WAS APPROVED UPON ISSUING THE PERMIT IT WAS GOOD FOR 180 DAYS SO THE ONLY TIME THE EXTENSION COMES INTO PLAY IS IF REVISIONS ARE REJECTED AGAIN.
I BELIEVE YOU WILL SPEAK WITH YOUR CLIENT?
[00:20:01]
IS THAT'S WHAT IS REQUESTED? >> AT THIS TIME AND I THINK ABRAHAM SHOULD EXPLAIN THE BACKGROUND.
THE PERMIT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND IS IN THE HANDS OF THE CITY AND THERE'S A QUESTION WHETHER THE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT WOULD REQUEST THAT LANDSCAPING BE MADE TO THE PLAN OR NOT AND THEY WERE GOING TO RECOMMEND THAT TO MY CLIENT SO HE WOULD MAKE THOSE CHANGES AND ADD THOSE AND IT WOULD BE SUBMITTED SO IT I THINK IT WAS MORE THAN JUST THE REVISION FEE TO KNOW REVISIONS WERE NEEDED, BUT IF THE LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING REVISIONS WERE NOT RECOMMENDED THE PLANS WERE READY IN A FORM TO BE REVIEWED. THE ENGINEER HAS BEEN COMMUNICATING THE CITY ON THAT AND WAITING ON FEEDBACK FROM MR. GILMORE WITH REGARDS TO THE ISSUE.
>> GOOD MORNING. I'M ERIN AND WE'VE BEEN BACK AND FORTH WITH THE WATER DISTRICT AND SOUTH FLOOR THE WATER DISTRICT APPROVED A PERMIT TO MODIFY IT DUE TO CONSTRUCTION.
BEFORE WE START CONSTRUCTION WE'LL HAVE TO HAVE A PERMIT FROM THE CITY. I'VE BEEN CORRESPONDING WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PERSON WAS ON VACATION AND DID NOT GET BACK WITH US TO LET US KNOW IF THEY NEED A LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PARKING LIGHTING PLAN. WE'RE WAITING ON A RESPONSE FROM THE CITY TO LET US KNOW IF THEY NEED THESE PLANS.
IF THE CITY CAN WORK WAS WE CAN START THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE WHILE WE'RE WORKING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE SIDING PLAN. WE DON'T HAVE A RESPONSE.
IT SEEMS IF WE CAN GET SOME TYPE OF WORKABLE AGREEMENT, WE CAN START THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE AND CERTIFY IT WHILE WE'RE WORKING ON THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING PLAN IF THE CITY REQUIRES THEM.
WE DON'T HAVE AN ANSWER FROM THE CITY IF THEY CAN REQUIRE A LANDSCAPE OR LIGHTING PLAN AT THIS TIME.
>> SO YOU ARE REQUESTING A 90 DAY EXTENSION.
>> WE REQUEST 90 DAYS TO WORK OUT THE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN US AND THE CITY TO KNOW IF WE NEED TO ADD THE LANDSCAPING AND LITHEING SO IT WOULD TAKE TIME TO HAVE THOSE REVIEWED.
WE'RE HAPPY TO PAY WHATEVER FEE NEEDS TO BE PAID IF THAT NEEDS TO BE PAID, THAT IS NOT A PROBLEM, BUT THE TIMING OF ADDING THOSE ADDITIONAL PARTS OF THE PLAN PER THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATION WE WOULD SEEK THE ENTIRE 90 DAYS.
>> I'D LIKE TO ADD SOMETHING. WE CAN'T GET SOMEBODY TO DO THE PLANS. EVERYONE IS BACKED UP.
IF THE CITY WANTS THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING PLAN IT MAY TAKE 45
DAYS TO FIND SOMEONE. >> I'M WELL AWARE OF THE BACK UP. WELL AWARE.
>> THIS IS SHAUN SMITH AND I WANT TO ADD SINCE THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED IT HAS BEEN SOMETHING THEY'VE BEEN ADDRESSING AND THEY'RE PROACTIVELY TRYING TO MOVE FORWARD AND IT'S SOMETHING WE WANT TO COMPLETE, FINISH AND GET
RESOLVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. >> MR. SHAUN COSS.
>> STAFF IS AGREEABLE TO THE 90 DAY EXTENSION AND WE PRAY IT'S PUT IN THE FOUR MONTH ORDER AND NOT MORALLY CONTINUED.
>> ALRIGHT. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I WILL GRANT THE ORDER FOR 90 DAYS AND THE ORDER WILL REFLECT THAT. THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.
>> THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.
[H. 21-3591 801 Edwards Road Orchid Island Juice Co. Frank Remling]
>> NEXT CASE? >> NEXT CASE IS 5H, 21-3591, 801 EDWARDS ROAD, ORCHID ISLAND JUICE COMPANY IS THE OWNER.
IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK, AS WELL THAT PODIUM MIC WILL CATCH YOU.
>> GOOD MORNING.>> GOOD MORNING.>> THIS WAS BROUGHT TO
[00:25:02]
ME. I'M FRANK MR. REMBLING AND I'M AN INVESTIGATOR/INSPECTOR AND I'VE BEEN PREVIOUSLY SWORN IN.THIS CASE WAS BROUGHT TO ME AS A COMPLAINT.
IT'S 21-3591801 EDWARDS ROAD, ORCHID ISLAND JUICE COMPANY.
3490. THE VIE LEGISLATION FLORIDA BUILDING CODE OF PERMIT REQUIRED AND THE CORRECTIVE ACTION IS ON A TEN A PERMIT FOR SEAL COATING AND STRIPING WITHOUT A PERMIT.
I DO HAVE PICTURES HERE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS HAVE
SEEN THE PICTURES. >> MR. MR. REMBLING IS IT ORCHID
SORRY ABOUT THAT. >> DO THESE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY SHOW THE VIOLATION AS YOU DEPICTED IT?
>> YES. >> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> THERE HAS BEEN A PERMIT APPLIED FOR AND THEY'RE THE PROCESS OF GETTING EVERYBODY TO LOOK AT IT AND GET EVERYTHING DONE AND I HAVE TALKED TO THE REPRESENTATIVE AND THEY HAVE
ASKED FOR AN EXTENSION. >> DO YOU AGREE TO GIVING THEM A COUNT WANT? MR. SHAUN COSS DO YOU HAVE A
WE'LL GET TO YOU. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE CONSIDERING THE PERMIT APPLICATION WAS APPLIED FOR ON FRIDAY STAFF HAS NOT HAD A CHANCE, BUT THE SCOPE SEEMS NARROW TO SEAL SOCIETYING AND RESTRIPING AND I DON'T SEE SIGNIFICANT ISSUES EVEN IF THE PERMIT WAS REJECTED THOSE SHOULD BE DONE IN 0 DAYS AND I BELIEVE THAT WOULD SATISFY THE RESPONDENTS REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME.
>> ALRIGHT. ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY?
YOUR NAME? >> I'M KATE NETHERS AND I'M
GRACE SESSIONTON. >> A CONTINUANCE OF 90 DAYS
PLEASE? >> I JUST WANT TO APOLOGIZE BECAUSE WE DIDN'T RECEIVE A NOTICE IN DECEMBER SO COULD NOT
HAVE LET THIS GO ON LIKE THIS. >> YOU'VE APPLIED FOR THE
PERMIT? >> THE DAY WE GOT THIS WE STARTED TO HANDLE IT. WE CALLED THE OFFICE AND HAD THEM APPLY THE PERMIT THE NEXT DAY.
>> AND THE PERMIT IS SUBMITTED? >> YES, MA'AM, ON THE 16TH.
>> THE CASE WAS INITIATED DECEMBER OF 2021.
>> I DID RECEIVE THE SECOND ONE. WHEN WAS THAT? THAT'S THE DAY WE CALLED THE OFFICE AND SPOKE WITH SOME LOVELY PEOPLE THERE. THAT WAS THE BEGINNING OF MAY.
THAT WAS THE SECOND ONE THAT CAME BY MAIL.
CERTIFIED. >> I BELIEVE THAT WAS MAY 15TH.
>> WHEN DID YOU START THE PERMITTING PROCESS?
>> THE NEXT DAY, YES, MA'AM. >> WE CALLED THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT THAT SAME DAY AND GOT THE CONTRACTOR IN THERE THE
SECOND DAY TO APPLY FOR IT. >> THE FIRST LETTER THAT CAME
DID IT COME IN REGULAR MAIL? >> I NEVER SAW IT SO I DON'T KNOW. BUT I DID SEE THE SECOND ONE.
>> THE SECOND CAME CERTIFIED. >> DOES THE CITY HAVE EVIDENCE
OF THAT CERTIFIED. >> THEY ARE NOT SENT CERTIFIED, BUT BOTH ITEMS WERE SENT TO THE SAME ADDRESS.
[00:30:20]
>> OKAY. THE ONLY VIOLATION IS THAT THEY PAINTED AROUND THIS YELLOW THING IS A VIOLATION.
SHOW ME WHERE THE VIOLATION IS IN THIS PICTURE?
>> WHERE THEY SEAL COATED THE EXISTING ASPHALT AND STRIPED IT WHERE THEY PAINT THE WHITE LINES AND HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY.
>> I THINK THEY ARE YELLOW IN THIS ONE.
>> THEY DIDN'T GET THE PERMIT IS THE VIOLATION?
THE WORK WAS SUFFICIENT THOUGH? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> ALRIGHT. TO ALL THE PARTIES.
AS SIMPLE AS THIS SEEMS IT'S DIFFICULT FOR ME.
I BELIEVE THEM WHEN THEY SAY THEY DIDN'T GET THE FIRST LETTER, BUT THEN ON THE SECOND LETTER THEY STARTED IMMEDIATE ACTION TO CORRECT THE FACT THAT THEY DIDN'T OBTAIN A PERMIT.
THE WORK IS NOT THE DIRECT CAUSE OF THE VIOLATION.
BUT THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE WORK THEY DID, RIGHT?
>> NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE. >> ALRIGHT.
I'M GOING TO GO OUT ON A LIMB HERE.
I'M JUST GOING TO CONTINUE THIS UNTIL YOU GET THE PERMIT.
I DON'T WANT TO FIND YOU IN VIOLATION YET, BUT CLEARLY THE WORK WAS FINE. YOU HAVE TO GET A PERMIT TO DO ALMOST ANYTHING ON YOUR PROPERTY NOW.
ALMOST ANYTHING, SO I'LL GIVE YOU TIME TO GET THE PERMIT AND ONCE THAT'S CLEARED, YOU SHOULD BE OKAY.
>> THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR COMING.
>> ARE YOU CONTINUING INDEFINITELY OR GIVING THEM A
TIMEFRAME? >> CONTINUED FOR 90 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT AND ONCE YOU GET THAT PERMIT, YOU SHOULD BE OKAY BECAUSE THE WORK, NOBODY FOUND WORK A PROBLEM, BUT THE PERMIT WAS A PROBLEM. YOU'RE WELCOME.
[B. 21-2867 202 Gardenia Avenue Gilliam, Darryl & Esquivel, Aida Logan Winn]
>> NEXT CASE? >> 5B, 21-2867202 GARDENIA AVENUE, GILLIAM, DARRYL AND ESQUIVEL AIDA ARE THE OWNERS.,2 AVENUE, GILLIAM, DARRYL AND ESQUIVEL AIDA ARE THE OWNERS. 2 AVENUE, GILLIAM, DARRYL AND ESQUIVEL AIDA ARE THE OWNERS.
>> GOOD MORNING MR. WINN WIN. WHEN YOU ARE READY.
>> I'M LOGAN WINN AND I WORK AS AN INSPECTOR/INVESTIGATOR.
THIS CASE IS 21-2867 OF 202 GARDENIA AVENUE.
THE OWNER IS GILLIAM, DARRYL AND ESQUIVEL AIDA.
THE VIOLATIONS ARE 105.1, PERMIT REQUIRED.
CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR ENCLOSED PATIO FOR WINDOWS AND STUCCO AND ANY OTHER RENOVATIONS FOR A PERMIT.
THEY APPLIED FOR THREE WINDOWS AND A DOOR THAT'S ACTUALLY IN
[00:35:01]
PLAN REVIEW. THEY NEED PRODUCT APPROVALS.THE PERMIT DOES NOT INCLUDE A HOLE SCOPE OF WORK AT THIS TIME.
I DO HAVE PICTURES. >> ARE YOU MR. GILLIAM?
HAS HE SEEN THESE PICTURE? >> I BELIEVE I HAVE.
YES, I'VE SEEN THESE. >> OKAY.
THANK YOU. >> DO TO PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICT THE
VIOLATION FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> THIS TIME I'LL DEPOSIT IT AS EXHIBIT ONE AS THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER, MR. WINN?
>> NO, MA'AM. >> SIR STATE YOUR NAME?
>> I'M DARRELL GILLIAM. >> HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE
ALLEGATIONS AGAINST YOU? >> I'M NOT REALLY SURE HOW TO RESPOND. IT IS AS HE STATED.
I ENCLOSED A PATIO WITH WINDOWS AND I WAS MAKING A STORAGE ROOM AND I DIDN'T KNOW I NEEDED A PERMIT.
THIS IS MY FIRST TIME OWNING A HOUSE AND SINCE THEN I'VE GONE THROUGH A LOT OF DETAIL TO GET IT DONE THE RIGHT WAY LOOKING FOR CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS AND I GOT A VIOLATION FROM THE CITY AND I GOT DOWN THAT LIST AND IT GOT FRUSTRATING AFTER A COUPLE OF WEEKS SO I MADE A PROFILE FOR EVERYONE I CONTACTED AND I FOUND SOMEONE THAT TOOK MY MONEY AND DID NOTHING AND IT WAS ONLY $50. ANOTHER BY THE TOOK $500.
THEY TOLD ME TO GET A DEMOLITION PERMIT AND NOW I THINK IT'S ROLLING. IT'S HARD FOR ME TO REACH THE $500 BECAUSE HE HAS NOT RESPONDED BACK TO ME, BUT I GOT A LOT MORE INFORMATION FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WHERE I NEED THE ENGINEER TO HAVE THEM LOOK AT IT AND I WOULD LOOK AT THIS POINT TO HAVE IT CONTINUED WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SO I DON'T HAVE TO KEEP MISSING WORK. IT'S BEEN EXPENSIVE.
IT WAS 1500 AND ANOTHER $388 FOR THE PERMIT AND 2,000 FOR THE WORK AND I NEED THE WORK. THE LAST TIME I WAS HERE I TOLD YOU I WOULD APPLY AND MOVE FORWARD AND I HAVE DONE THAT AND I HOPE THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WILL LET ME MOVE FORWARD AND DEAL WITH THEM SO I CAN STOP COMING TO COURT BECAUSE I AIN'T GOING TO MMS. DOING ANYTHING ON MY HOUSE I'M GOING TO ASK IF I NEED A PERMIT AND I HOPE THAT I'VE SATISFIED THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND THE COURT AT THIS POINT AND I CAN MOVE FORWARD AND
JUST WORK WITH THEM ON THIS. >> IS THE HOUSE IN THE
PERMITTING PROCESS? >> YES, MA'AM.
THEY APPLIED FOR THE PERMIT AND THEY ARE MISSING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE WINDOWS AND THE DOORS, BUT THERE'S A DISCREPANCY IN REGARD TO THE SCOPE OF THE PERMIT THEY WERE GOING TO
ACTUALLY DO. >> WHO'S GOING TO I GUESS PERMITTING PROCESS. WHO'S WORKING WITH YOU?
>> I BOUGHT THE WINDOWS FROM HOME DEPOT AND THEY GAVE IT TO ME SO IT MIGHT NOT BE THE RIGHT STUFF.
I WILL FOLLOW UP WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT SO SEE WHAT THEY WANT AND GO BACK TO WHERE I PURCHASED THE WINDOWS.
THE PEOPLE THAT WERE THERE WHEN I WENT, THE GUY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT HE WAS DOING. OBVIOUSLY WHAT HE GAVE HE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT AND THAT'S WHERE THEY WERE PURCHASED AND I'VE ALSO SUBMITTED COPIES WHEN I WENT THROUGH THE COPY OF WHERE THEY WERE PURCHASED AND THE DOOR WAS FROM LOW, SO THAT WILL BE DONE. WHAT HE REQUESTED WILL BE COMPLIED WITH. THE PRODUCT CODE INFORMATION WILL COME FROM WHERE I BOUGHT IT HERE IN FT. PIERCE AT HOME DEPOT AND LOWS AND I'LL GIVE IT TO THEM
[00:40:05]
THEM. >> MY PROBLEM WITH THIS IS THAT, I MEAN, MOST PEOPLE KNOW THAT, YOU'RE DOING THESE RENOVATIONS YOURSELF? MOST PEOPLE KNOW YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PERMIT TO DO ANYTHING TO YOUR HOUSE.
>> YOU JUST CAN'T START RENOVATING WITHOUT GETTING A PERMIT AND THE REASON IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE RENOVATIONS ARE PROPERLY DONE AND NUMBER ONE, THAT THEY ARE SAFE.
YOU HAVE CHILDREN AT THE HOUSE?>> I DO.
>> HOW OLD ARE THEY? >> 7 AND 6.
I TOOK THEM TO SCHOOL ON THE WAY HERE.
>> BEING A PARENT YOU DO A LOT OF THINGS BEFORE YOU GET TO WORK. I KNOW THAT.
EVEN A GRANDMOTHER NOW. AND HE'S IN THE PERMITTING
AND YOU DO KNOW THAT ONCE YOU GET THAT PERMIT YOU HAVE 180
DAYS TO CURE THINGS, RIGHT? >> ABSOLUTELY.
>> HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED AT THE HOUSE?>> THIS IS OUR FIRST HOUSE. WE BOUGHT IT TWO YEARS AGO.
WE LIVED ACROSS THE STREET BEFORE THEN AT 203 GARDENIA AND WE WERE IN A PROGRAM WITH THE CITY TO HELP US BUILD OUR CREDIT AND PUT MONEY AWAY BECAUSE WE CAME FROM POVERTY, BUT THEN I GOT MY CREDIT SCORE UP TO 800 AND WE'RE EMPLOYED AND BOUGHT OUR FIRST HOUSE. IT IS A FIXER UPPER, BUT WE'RE
DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE RENOVATIONS THAT YOU'RE DOING I'M GOING TO FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND YOU'RE RESPONSIBLE FOR IT. I THINK YOU KNEW YOU NEEDED A PERMIT FOR SOME OF THE WORK. YOU HAVE TO HAVE KNOWN THAT.
YOU ARE IN THE PERMITTING PROCESS SO I'LL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND YOU SHOULD BE DONE BY THEN.
OBTAIN APPROVAL AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDER OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED. NOW IF YOU RUN INTO PROBLEMS AND YOU NEED AN EXTENSION, YOU NEED TO GET WITH THE CITY.
>> I'M RUNNING INTO PROBLEMS. THE GUY THAT I HAVE THAT'S AN ARCHITECT NOW. I LET HIM KNOW I HAD A COURT DATE AND HE SAID THAT I SHOULD DEMOLITION IT AND MOVE FORWARD WHICH IS NOT THE WAY TO DO THINGS AND ALL THE CONTRACTORS HAVE A 45 DAY WAIT LIST AND I HAVE NO PROBLEM TO GIVE THEM MONEY, BUT THAT'S THE PROBLEM AND I'VE GOT AN ENTIRE LIST HERE FROM THE CITY THAT I'VE BEEN DETAILING FROM PERSON-TO-PERSON THAT I'VE CONTACTED ONE AFTER THE OTHER.
>> SO WE KNOW THERE'S A SHORTAGE.
WE UNDERSTAND THAT. >> I'VE CROSSED OFF 115 PEOPLE IN MY NOTE, SO THEY WERE ALL BACKED UP.
>> WE UNDERSTAND THAT. NOT ONLY IS THERE A PROBLEM WITH GETTING SOMEBODY TO DO THE WORK THAT'S LEGALLY QUALIFIED, THERE'S A BACK ONE SUPPLIES. I'M AWARE AND I TAKE THAT SO INTO CONSIDERATION, BUT I DO THINK THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT YOU NEEDED A PERMIT TO DO THAT KIND OF WORK AT YOUR HOUSE.
NOW YOU HAVE 60 DAYS TO APPEAL, BUT ONCE YOU GET THE PERMIT AND I SUGGEST YOU STAY IN TOUCH WITH THE CITY OF WHERE THE PERMIT IS
[00:45:04]
YOU GET SIX MONTHS TO COMPLY IF YOU CAN'T GET THE WORK DONE IN SIX MONTHS YOU COME BACK HERE AND ASK FOR AN EXTENSION.GOOD LUCK TO YOU. >> THANK YOU.
[F. 21-3585 1815 Melaleuca Dr Celentano, Frank Logan Winn]
>> NEXT CASE, MADAM CLERK? >> THE NEXT CASE IS 5 F, 21-3585, ADDRESS IS 1815 MELALEUCA DRIVE, FRANK CELENTANO
>> CASE 21-3585, 1815 MELALEUCA DRIVE, CASE WAS INITIATED DECEMBER 14TH, 2021. THE OWNER IS FRANK CELENTANO VIOLATION PERMIT REQUIRED. RENEW EXPIRED PERMITS FOR A REROOF AND 20-283 FOR THE WORK BEING A DONE ON EXPIRED PERMITS.
OBTAINING A PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL WORK BEING DONE OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF THE EXPIRED PERMIT.
CURRENTLY THE PERMITS HAVE NOT BEEN RENEWED AND NO PERMIT HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR OTHER WORK DONE.
I DO HAVE PICTURES HERE THAT WERE TAKEN OF THE PROPERTY?
>> HAS HE SEEN THEM? >> GOOD SHOT.
>> MR. WINN WHETHER WHEN WERE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN?
WHAT WAS THE DATE? >> THE DAY THE CASE WAS INITIATED. DECEMBER 14TH, 2021.
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT AS YOU OBSERVED IT? AT THIS TIME THE CITY WILL DEPOSIT THIS AS EXHIBIT ONE.
I HAVE A FEW MORE QUESTIONS FOR YOU.
DO YOU HAVE THE DATES OF WHEN THE ORIGINAL PERMITS EXPIRED?
>> I DO NOT. >> ARE WE ABLE TO LOOK THOSE UP?
>> I CAN PULL IT UP. MR. WINN WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE THAT WORK WAS BEING DONE ON THE PROPERTY MOST
RECENTLY? >> UM... THE LAST THING I SEEN DONE WAS THE DAY I WROTE THIS CASE.
>> YOU HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING SINCE THEN?
>> I'M NOT SURE IF YOU HAVE THIS BUT IF AND WHEN A REQUEST FOR AN INSPECTION WAS RECEIVED. DID WE RECEIVE ANYTHING? OK OKAY.
[00:50:49]
>> ON PERMIT 284 EXPIRED AUGUST 9TH, 2020.
AND THERE WERE NO REQUESTS AND INSPECTIONS FOR THAT PERMIT.
20-283 ALSO EXPIRED 2019, AUGUST 20TH AND THERE WERE NO INSPECTIONS FOR THAT PERMIT EIT
EITHER. >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY
AT THIS TIME>> OKAY AND MR. CELENTANO HOW DO YOU RESPOND?.>
CELENTANO HOW DO YOU RESPOND?>>O YOU RESPOND?
>> I DON'T KNOW. JUST A LOT OF HARD WORK.
>> WHAT ABOUT THE PERMITTING PROCESS?
>> I WENT DOWN AND THEY WOULDN'T SELL THEM TO ME THIS TIME.
I HAVE NO CLUE. >> ARE YOU DOING TO WORK
>> ARE YOU DOING THE WORK YOURSELF?
YES. >> WHERE ARE YOU NOW WITH OBTAINING A PERMIT TO GET THIS WORK DONE?
>> I COULDN'T TELL YOU THAT NEITHER.
THE CITY PUT A STOP WORK ORDER ON ME.
SO I STOPPED WORKER. >> BUT YOU DIDN'T FIND OUT WHY.
>> I DON'T HAVE A PERMIT SO HERE I AM.
>> SO WHAT ARE YOUR FUTURE INTENTIONS FOR THE PROPERTY?
>> SELL ME THE PERMITS AND I'LL GO BACK TO WORK.
>> BUT YOU HAVE TO APPLY FOR THE PERMIT, YOU UNDERSTAND THAT?
>> I DID. >> AND YOU HAVE NOT HEARD FROM
>> HAVE YOU FOLLOWED UP TO SEE WHERE THEY ARE?
>> NO. >> WHY NOT? WHY? THEY TURNED ME DOWN.
SAID NO, THEY WOULDN'T SELL THEM TO ME SO HERE I AM.
>> THERE'S A PRECEDENCE YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH.
THE CITY DOES NOT SELL THEM TO YOU.
YOU APPLY AND YOU MAKE A REQUIREMENT SO THE ISSUING OF THE PERMIT THEN YOU CAN GO FORWARD WITH THE WORK.
>> I DON'T KNOW. >> IF WE'RE CLEAR THE RENEWAL REQUEST WHICH IS WHAT'S BEING REQUESTED FOR THESE ITEMS ARE THE RENEWAL REQUEST IS TAKING IN FROM ONE OF THE PERMIT TAX AT THE FRONT COUNTER AND THOSE ARE FORWARDED TO ME FOR REVIEW AND I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY RENEWAL FOR THIS.
HE'S INDICATING THERE WAS WORK DONE OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF THE TWO PERMITS AND AN ADDITIONAL ONE IS REQUIRED FOR THAT WORK.
IT'S MY KNOWLEDGE THAT NO APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE FOR TAT. MR. CELENTANO WHEN WERE YOU HERE TO REQUEST THE RENEWAL OF THOSE PERMITS.
>> PROBABLY JANUARY, I IMAGINE. >> OKAY.
[00:55:02]
>> DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU NEED TO DO NOW?
>> DO YOU INTEND TO GET THIS WORK DONE?
>> IT WOULD BE NICE TO GET IT DONE BEFORE THE HURRICANES GET
HERE? >> ARE YOU DOING THE WORK
>> DO YOU HAVE ANYBODY HELPING YOU?
>> NO. >> ALRIGHT THEN BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTED ATAT THIS TIM AND I'LL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO GET A PERMIT.
OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A $100 PER DAY FINE WILL BE ADDED. YOU NEED TO TALK WITH THE CITY AND SEE WHAT IT IS YOU NEED DO WITH THAT.
IF YOU ARE DOING OUTSIDE THE SCOPE THAT REQUIRES A PERMIT YOU WILL FIND YOURSELF IN VIOLATION AGAIN, YOU UNDERSTAND?
>> YES. >> ANY QUESTIONS?>> YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. GOOD LUCK.
[M. 22-985 530 N 11th St Apt A Schibar, Claude Edward Smith]
>> OKAY THE NEXT CASE IS 5M, 530 NORTH 11TH STREET APT. A, CLAUDE SCHIBAR IS THE OWNER. THIS IS ITEM 22-985.
>> MORN MRG SMITH. YOU MAY PROCEED.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE? HE WASN'T HERE FOR SWEARING IN
SO I SHOULD. >> GO AHEAD AND SWEAR HIM IN.
>> WOULD YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU WILL PROVIDE WILL BE THE TRUTH? THANK YOU.
WE HAVE HERE CASE NUMBER 222-98, 530 NORTH 11TH STREET APT. A, CLAUDE SCHIBAR IS THE OWNER AND THE ADDRESS IS P.O. BOX 785 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33416. CASE WAS INITIATED MARCH 16TH, 2022 AND THE VIOLATIONS ARE IPMC 304 POINT 18.1, 2021 BUILDING SECURITY DOOR, 504.1, 2021 PLUMBING FIXTURE.
309.9, 2021 INFESTATION. CORRECTIVE TAX TO REPLACE TERMITE DAMAGED DOORS AND MAKE NECESSARY PLUMBING REPAIRS FOR NON-WORKING TOILET AND TREAT PROPERTY FOR INFESTATION.
THE RECOMMENDATION, THE CITY REQUESTS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATIONS EXISTS AND THE VIOLATORS ARE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN PERMITS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 BE ASSESSED PER DAY. THERE WERE NO PERMITS FOR REQUESTS FOR REINSPECTION. THE OWNER IS WORKING ON
EVICTION. >> DO YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF
>> HAS HE HAD A CHANCE TO SEE THOSE PHOTOGRAPH?
>> HAVE YOU SEEN THESE BEFORE? >> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND
[01:00:22]
ACCURATELY DEPICT THE EVIDENCE AS YOU OBSERVED IT?>> YES. >> THIS WILL BE ADMITTED.
>> THANK YOU. >> ANYTHING FURTHER, MR. SMITH?
>> NOPE. >> HOW DID THIS COME BEFORE
CODE? >> IT WAS AN INVESTIGATION REQUEST BY THE TENANT. A COMPLAINT, I SHOULD SAY BY THE TEN TENANT.
>> ALRIGHT. SO YOU'VE SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPH?
>> YES, MA'AM,>> HOW DO YOU RESPOND?
>> THIS ALL GOT STARTED AFTER WE SENT OUT A LETTER TO VACATE.
WE WERE TERMINATING THEIR LEASE AT THE BEGINNING OF MARCH AND IN THE MIDDLE OF MARCH IS WHEN THEY STARTED COMPLAINTS.
WE GAVE THEM 45 DAYS AND THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE OUT BY APRIL. I CALLED SEVERAL TIMES.
FINALLY WE HAD TO GO THROUGH AN EVICTION PROCESS THAT TOOK A FEW WEEKS AND FINALLY WE WERE ABLE TO GET THEM OUT LAST SUNDAY, I BELIEVE THE 12TH, SO MONDAY, WENT IN AND WAS ABLE TO ASSESS THE PROBLEM. AS FAR AS HIKE THE TOILET, IT WAS MAYBE THE THIRD TIME THEY HAD BROKEN IT, LAST YEAR THERE WAS A PROBLEM AND WE MISSION FIXED IT AND THIS YEAR THERE WAS ANOTHER PROBLEM AND I CALLED THE PLUMMER AND THEY FIXED IT AND THEN THEY SAID THE PLUMMER BROKE THE TOILET AND THEN THEY WITHHELD THE RENT FOR FEBRUARY. THEY SAID THEY HAD TO GET ANOTHER PLUMMER THAT TURNED OUT NOT TO BE THE CASE BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO COME UP WITH A RECEIPT OR PROOF.
THEY WERE ABLE TO MAKE UP THE RENT FOR MARCH, BUT WE SENT THEM A LETTER TO TERMINATE THEIR LEASE AT THE BEGINING OF MARCH, A WEEK OR SO PRIOR TO THEM CALLING HERE.
FINALLY THE EVICTION WAS PASSED AND THEY VACATED ON SUNDAY SO I'M IN THE PROCESS OF CLEANING THE PLACE AND TAKING CARE OF THE PROBLEMS, RIGHT NOW THERE IS NO ONE LIVING THERE.
>> MAY I ASKING FOR PRAYER YOU SOMETHING? DO YOU HAVE PLUMBING PILLS OR ANYTHING ELSE TO SHOW US?
>> THE EVICTION PROCESS. >> MAY WE SEE THAT? DO YOU HAVE ANOTHER COPY OF THIS? OK OKAY.
>> ARE WE ABLE TO MAKE A COPY? STAFF CAN MAKE A COPY AND WE CAN INCLUDE THAT AS RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT ONE IN THE FILE?
>> WE NEED TO TALK TO A LONZO ABOUT HIS PENMANSHIP.
ALRIGHT. THIS WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> SO RIGHT NOW THAT IT'S EMPTY I'M STARTING THE PROCESS OF GETTING IT PAINTED AND CLEANED. EVERYTHING THAT WAS DAMAGED.
I JUST WENT BACK THIS PAST SUNDAY AND APPARENTLY NOW THE AIR-CONDITIONING AND THE WINDOW WAS BUSTED OUT.
I HAD TO GO TO HOME DEPOT TO GET WOOD TO COVER THE DAMAGED AREA RIGHT THERE. THEY YANKED IT RIGHT OUT AND HAD A WOOD SUPPORT ON THE WINDOW AND IT JUST HAPPENS THAT WAS THE LAST AIR CONDITIONER I HAD BOUGHT FOR THEM SO IT WAS A
PRETTY NEW ONE. >> THIS IS THE COPY OF THE
[01:05:01]
PLUMMER. THIS WAS BACK IN THE END OFJANUARY. >> WE CAN MAKE A COPY OF THAT FOR YOU, AS WELL. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WE CAN MAKE
THAT RESPONDENT EXHIBIT TWO. >> IT WILL BE MARKED AS SUCH.
>> THIS IS THE ORIGINAL LETTER TO VACATE WHICH IS DATED MARCH
THE 5TH. >> THAT'S OKAY UNLESS YOU WANT
US TO HAVE IT. >> IF YOU DON'T NEED OUT.
>> THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE COPIES AND GIVE YOU THE ORIGINAL BACK.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> YEAH, I MEAN NOW THAT IT'S EMPTY OBVIOUSLY ANY PROBLEMS THE HOUSE MAY HAVE AS FAR AS INFESTATION, I'M THERE EVERY MONTH TO COLLECT THE RENT AND WE'VE NEVER HAD A PROBLEM. LAST YEAR WHEN I FIRST BOUGHT THE HOUSE THEY HAD A ROW DENT PROBLEM, BUT THAT WAS A YEAR AND A HALF, ALMOST TWO YEARS AGO. THERE'S LIKE A CRAWL SPACE UP IN THE A TICK THERE, BUT YOU KNOW EVERY COUPLE OF MONTHS, STRAY
AROUND THE PROPERTY. >> WHO WOULD STAY AROUND THE
PROPERTY? >> THE TENANTS IN THE SAME BUILDING, THEY'VE NEVER HAD A PROBLEM.
>> WHO WOULD STAY AROUND THE HOUSE?
>> THE ANT KILLER FROM HOME DEPOT AND OTHERS WOULD SPRAY
AROUND THE PERIMETER. >> YOU DIDN'T HIRE A
PROFESSIONAL EXTERMINATOR. >> I WISH I COULD SO I TRY TO DO AS MUCH OF THE WORKS A POSSIBLE MYSELF WITHIN MY ABILITY AND MY
LIMITS. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IF I MAY, SIR, DO YOU HAVE A TENANT IN THERE OR ARE YOU PLANNING TO
HAVE ONE ANYTIME SOON? >> IT'S EMPTY RIGHT NOW, SO I'M GUESSING IT WILL BE AT LEAST A MONTH OR SO BECAUSE I'M PAINTING. I LIVE SOUTH OF PALM BEACH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND THAT'S AN HOUR AND A HALF ONE WAY.
I WORK FULL-TIME SO I'M NOT ABLE TO COME HERE EVERY DAY.
SO I TRY TO DO AS MUCH WORKS A POSSIBLE.
>> I BELIEVE STAFF IS INCLINED TO GIVE YOU TIME TO RECTIFY THE ISSUES, BUT WE NEED TO COME IN AND SEE THAT PROGRESS IS BEING MADE. ARE YOU AGREE TO BE ABLE ALLOWING OUR INVESTIGATORS BACK IN?
>> ABSOLUTELY. >> WE EITHER REQUESTED THAT AGREEMENT WOULD BE FOR 60 DAYS FOR HIM TO CORRECT ANY OF THE
VIOLATIONS ON THE PROPERTY. >> MR. SHAUN COSS IS THAT
THANK YOU. >> ARE YOU ASKING FOR A
CONTINUANCE FOR 60 DAY? >> YES, MA'AM.
SINCE THERE'S A BONA FIDE EVICTION IN PLACE.
>> HERE'S THE PROBLEM I GOT WITH HIS TESTIMONY.
THIS IS A DUPLEX, RIGHT SO THERES SO SOMEBODY ON THE OTHER
>> OKAY. THE TERMITE DAMAGED DOOR.
HOW COME YOU DIDN'T REPLACE THAT?
>> THE TERMITE DAMAGE AS FAR AS WHEN I BOUGHT THE HOUSE I WAS UNDER THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IT HAD BEEN TREATED AND THE DOORS ARE OLD LOOKING. THEY WORK AND LOCK AND DO WHAT THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO DO, BUT THEY'RE NOT PRETTY.
THEY'RE OLD AND WORN. WHEN I WENT LAST YEAR TO GET A PERMIT I HAD A GUY THAT SOMEONE HAD MET IN THE HOME DEPOT PARKING LOT AND I GOT AN ESTIMATE FROM THEM AND THEY WERE A CONTRACTOR, BUT THEY HAVE TO BE REGISTERED WITH THE CITY SO THEY CAME TO THE HOUSE AND GAVE ME THE ESTIMATE AND SAID YOU BUY THE DOORS AND WE DO THE JOB AND I'M LIKE, I'M PRETTY SURE WE NEED A PERMIT AND THEY WERE NOT REGISTERED SO BACK TO SQUARE ONE AGAIN. THE LAST GENTLEMEN SAID THE CITY HAS A LIST? I DON'T KNOW HOW TO GO ABOUT GETTING THAT LIST AND MAYBE GETTING SOMEONE WITH THAT.
>> THE TOILET? >> THE TOILET WAS FIXED.
RIGHT NOW I'M REPLACING THE TOILET TO PUT IN A NEWER ONE.
SO BASICALLY I'M TAKING OUT THE TOILET, I GUESS THE VANITY WITH
[01:10:01]
THE MIRROR IN THE BATHROOM IS KIND OF WORN OUT.I WANT TO CHANGE THE LIGHTS IN THE BATHROOM BECAUSE THEY'RE OLD LOO LOOKING.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, THERE IS A CODE ORDINANCE REGARDING ACTION WHILE THERE'S A BONA FIDE EVICTION PROCEEDING, THAT IS CITY CODE ORDINANCE 103-345. I CAN SHOW THAT TOO.
>> WHAT DOES IT SAY? >> I DON'T BELIEVE UNDER THAT ORDINANCE AT THIS POINT WE CAN TAKE ADVERSE ACTION WHILE THE BONA FIDE EVICTION PROCESS HAS PROCEEDED, SO I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE AND I THINK MR. COSS IS IN THE SAME POSITION AS ME.
THAT'S PART OF THE REASON FOR THE 60 DAY CONTINUANCE.
>> I APPRECIATE THAT BECAUSE I FIND THIS TROUBLING.
YOU TOOK THE PICTURES? >> I DID NOT.
>> THE CITY TOOK THEM. I CAN'T DO ANYTHING HERE BECAUSE OF THIS CODE. THANK YOU COUNSELOR.
BECAUSE IF I COULD I WOULD FINE YOU.
I FIND NO VALUE TO THE EXCUSES YOU HAVE GIVEN HERE THIS MORNING. NONE.
AND I ALWAYS ASK PEOPLE, WOULD YOU LIVE THERE? WOULD YOU LET YOUR CHILDREN OR GRANDCHILDREN LIVE IN A PLACE LIKE THAT? DON'T ANSWER THAT.
I FIND THIS CASE EXTREMELY TROUBLING.
THAT PEOPLE LIVE LIKE THIS AND PAY RENT AND YOUR EXCUSE FOR THE INFESTATION IS THAT YOU TAKE A SPRAY CAN AND GO AROUND THE HOUSE. NO, NO.
I'M GOING TO CONTINUE THIS FOR 60 DAYS PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES.
[N. 22-1070 1104 Mayflower Rd Justin, Lareste Logan Winn]
NEXT CASE. >> NEXT CASE IS 5N, 82 -1070, 1104 MAYFLOWER ROAD, LARESTE JUSTIN IS THE OWNER.
>> CASE 822 -19701104 MAYFLOWER ROAD.
OWNER IS LARESTE JUSTIN. VIOLATION IS 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED AND CORRECTIVE ACTION IS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR ELECTRIC WORK OR ANY RENOVATION WORK BEING DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. THERE ARE NO PERMITS FOR THIS WORK TOO FAR. I DO HAVE PICTURES OF THE HOUSE.
>> HAS THE RESPONDENT SEEN THOSE PHOTOGRAPHS? DO THESE FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
>> I'M DOUG SERIOUS. >> I DON'T THINK HE WAS SWORN
>> GO AHEAD. CAN YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
DO YOU SWEAR THE TESTIMONY YOU PROVIDE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
AND IT'S KIRBY FILLIUS. >> ARE YOU HERE AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF LARESTE JUSTIN?
THAT'S MY GRAND DAD. >> HOW DO YOU RESPOND?
>> HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE ALLEGATION?
[01:15:01]
>> I GUESS I GOT TO GET A PERMIT.
THAT'S ALL. >> THIS STARTED IN IN MAY BY THE CITY. NOW YOU'VE BEEN HERE BEFORE?
>> YES. >> YOU KNOW YOU HAVE TO GET
PERMITS. >> I GOT TO THAT POINT AND I STOPPED WORKING AND I JUST GET A LETTER.
I AIN'T WORKED ON THIS PLACE FOR A YEAR AND A HALF SO I WONDER
WHY I GOT TO GO TO COURT. >> CAN YOUR GRANDDAD APPEAR HERE
TO SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF? >> I'M SPEAKING ON HIS BEHALF.
>> WE DIDN'T NEED NO PERMIT. I PULLED THE PERMIT FOR THE ROOF AND I WAS TRYING TO MAKE SURE WHAT KIND OF SCOPE OF WORK IT
WAS. >> I THINK YOU HAVE A VERY BRIGHT FUTURE. YOU'VE BEEN HERE BEFORE BECAUSE YOU'VE HELPED OTHER PEOPLE. THE THING IS THE CITY NEEDS TO
BE YOUR BEST FRIEND. >> THEY AIN'T MY FRIEND.
>> EVERYTHING YOU DO OBJECTIVE ON A PROPERTY YOU NEED A PERMIT SO YOU NEED TO CALL AND SEE IF YOU NEED A PERMIT.
>> I CAN HAVE A LONGER TIME? >> IT TAKES A LONG TIME FOR EVERYBODY. YOU I'M, I LIKE THE WORK THAT YOU DO JUST LOOKING AT THE PICTURES, BUT YOU GOT TO PULL PERMITS AND THIS IS THE SECOND TIME I KNOW YOU HAVE BEEN IN HERE BECAUSE YOUR DID WORK AND DIDN'T HAVE A PERMIT AND THEN I THINK YOU CAME IN WITH SOMEBODY ELSE BEFORE TO HEARING WAS OVER SO MY MEMORY IS GETTING BAD, BUT NOT THAT BAD.
SO DO YOU UNDERSTAND YOU HAVE TO PULL A PERMIT BEFORE YOU DO
ANYTHING? >> WHEN I CAME IN LAST TIME I
HAD A PERMIT FOR A ROOF. >> LET'S STICK WITH TODAY.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT EVERY TIME YOU GET READY TO DO SOMETHING YOU NEED TO CALL AND COME DOWN HERE AND ASK, DO NEED A PERMIT, IS THAT CLEAR? BECAUSE THE FINES ARE GOING TO INCREASE, I'M GOING TO TELL YOU THAT. IS IT WORTH IT?
IS IT WORTH IT? >> I DON'T UNDERSTAND.
LIKE YOU SAY IS IT WORTH IT? I HAVE TO PAY.
I'M IN A SITUATION WHERE WHATEVER COMES, COMES.
I JUST PREPARE MYSELF FOR THE WORSE.
>> SO YOU WANT ME TO JUST CONTINUE TO FINE ME.
>> IF THAT'S WHAT YOU GOT TO DO, DO IT.
>> THAT'S NOT WHAT YOU BELIEVE. YOU CAN MAKE A TON OF MONEY, BUT
YOU HAVE TO PULL A PERMIT. >> DO WHATEVER YOU GOT TO DO.
>> LISTEN. YOU SEE US? WE HAVE TO PAY A LICENSE FEE EVERY YEAR TO PRACTICE LAW.
EVERY YEAR TO KEEP OUR LICENSE ALIVE.
SO YOU ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING DIFFERENT.
>> THIS CITY IS MAKING A LOT OF MONEY FINING PEOPLE FOR HAVING A
BETTER. >> PUT US OUT OF BUSINESS AND DO
WHAT'S RIGHT. >> DO AND THEN IT STILL AIN'T
RIGHT. >> THEN DO WHAT YOU TELL THEM TO DO. I'M TRYING TO PUT YOU ON THE RIGHT TRACK, BUT THE CITY WILL STAY IN YOUR POCKET.
THEY WILL SO JUST PULL A PERMIT. >> SINCE I STARTED THIS YA'LL
BEEN IN MY PERMIT. >>LE WAYS PULL THEM C.
>> YOU CAN'T GO OUTSIDE OF THAT PERMIT.
>> I DO THAT TOO. >> KEEP COMING BACK HERE.
YOU HAVE A WONDERFUL SMILE. >> I DON'T HAVE NO PROBLEM.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? THEN BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, COME BACK, COME BACK. WE'RE NOT DONE.
I HAVE TO FINE YOU SINCE YOU'RE NOT GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAW.
[01:20:01]
STAND RIGHT THERE. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 1104 MAYFLOWER ROAD AND THAT LARESTE JUSTIN IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE.HE'S REPRESENTED HERE THIS MORNING BY HIS GRANDSON AS HIS REPRESENTATIVE. WE'LL GIVE HIM 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL IT'S CLOSED AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR YOU WILL
BE FINED $100 A DAY. >> I'M USED TO IT.
>> NO, NO, THAT'S NOT IT. >> WHAT ELSE YOU WANT?
>> I GOT SOMETHING ELSE I NEED TO SAY.
STAND STILL FOR A MINUTE. >> I'M ON THE CLOCK.
>> LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING? DO YOU DRIVE A CAR OR A TRUCK OR A VAN? I'M ASKING YOU THAT?
>> WHY? >> ANSWER MY QUESTION?
>> WHAT'S THE PURPOSE OF ME DRIVING A CAR OR TRUCK GOT TO DO
WITH A HOUSE? >> ANSWER MY QUESTION.
DO YOU HAVE A CAR? >> I DON'T WANT TO ANSWER THE
QUESTION. >> DO YOU HAVE A LICENSE?
>> I DO HAVE A LICENSE. >> YOU HAVE A LICENSE LIKE YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PERMIT. YOU KEEP COMING HERE THE FINES
WILL INCREASE. >> I HAVE TO PAY A FINE SO I'M
USED TO IT. >> IF YOU LIKE GIVING MONEY TO THE GOVERNMENT MUNICIPALITIES. ALRIGHT I'LL SEE YOU NEXT TIME WITH THE FINES. YOU HAVE ANOTHER ONE SO GO SIT DOWN. NEXT CASE.
>> WE'RE GOING TO DO HIS OTHER CASE.
>> DON'T DO THAT OTHER ONE. LET SOMEBODY ELSE.
SKIP THAT AND LET HIM COOL OFF. >> WE'LL DO 6C.
>> I APOLOGIZE DID YOU TELL ME THAT HE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
>> I DID NOT RULE YET. >> YOU DID NOT RULE?
>> SO WE'RE GOING TO RECALL THAT ONE?
[C. 21-726 1108 N 16th Court Marceus, Modeline & Francola, Diedonne Shaun Coss]
GO AHEAD. >> 6C, 21-726, 1108 NORTH 16TH
STREET,DIEDANE LEE. >> THIS IS CASE 1108 NORTH 16TH STREET AND VIOLATIONS ARE BUILDING CODE 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED. THIS MATTER CAME BEFORE YOU OCTOBER 20TH OF 2021 IN A NOTICE OF EXTENSION A TIME WAS RECORDED WITH A 90 DAY EXTENSION ON JANUARY THIRD, 2021.
>> MARCH 28TH, 2022 WE RECEIVED A REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND YOU DID GRANT IT. THERE WAS NO HEARING IN MAY SO THIS MATTER IS BACK BEFORE YOU TODAY.
I DID GO BY THE PROPERTY THIS MORNING AND SAW THE SHED IS STILL ON THE PROPERTY. I RECALL AT THE LAST HEARING THE PROPERTY OWNER INDICATED SHE WAS TORN BETWEEN GETTING DRAWINGS PREPARED OR IF SHE WAS GOING TO REMOVE THE SHED.
I BELIEVE SHE HAD DRAWINGS PREPARED FOR IT SO I'D LIKE TO HEAR AN UPDATE PRIOR TO MAKING A RECOMMENDATION.
>> WERE YOU SWORN? HOW DO YOU RESPOND?
>> I HAVE THIS FROM THE FAMILY. >> HAVE YOU SHOWN THAT TO THE
CITY? >> I JUST GOT IT LAST NIGHT.
>> YOU HAVE THAT PERMIT WITH YOU?
THE DRAWINGS WITH YOU? >> MR. SHAUN COSS CAN YOU LOOK AT THOSE BRIEFLY. SHOW THEM TO MR. COSS, PLEASE?
[01:25:36]
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS SUBMITTED A THREE SET OF SITE DRAWINGS FROM AN ENGINEER, AS WELL AS AN INSPECTION REPORT FROM AN ENGINEER.
I WILL SAY THAT UNFORTUNATELY THESE PLANS WILL NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE HOWEVER IT IS A GOOD START AND I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER IF SHE'S GOING TO PULL THE PERMIT HERSELF THAT SHE SUBMIT THESE TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT UP STAIR, SO WE CAN HAVE THE APPLICATION ON RECORD AND I CAN HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO A FORMAL REVIEW AND PROVIDE FORMAL
REVIEW COMMENTS. >> YOU UNDERSTAND?
>> ALRIGHT. WELL I CAN'T GIVE ADVICE.
I'M GOING TO CONTINUE THIS FOR, YOU THINK 60 DAYS SHE'LL BE IN
PERMITING? >> BECAUSELL NEED TO GO THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE PERMITTING PROCESS,
AS WELL I RECOMMEND 90 DAYS. >> WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE THIS FOR 90 DAYS AND I SUGGEST YOU GET WITH ONE OF THE CITY OFFICES SO THAT THEY CAN EXPLAIN TO YOU HOW YOU NEED TO SUBMIT THESE TO BUILDING. THEY TAKE A LOOK AND THEN YOU GO FORWARD FROM THERE. I KNOW IT IS A LOT OF WORK.
>> THANK YOU. >> YOU'RE WELCOME.
>> WHO SHOULD SHE TALK TO? >> SAM, COULD YOU GET HER PHONE
NUMBER AND I'LL GIVE HER A CALL? >> THANK YOU.
[D. 21-1163 1909 N 16th Street Harold Kessler (Est) c/o R G Developer Inc. Shaun Coss]
NEXT CASE MADAM CLERK? >> THE NEXT CASE IS 6D, 21-1163, 1909 NORTH 16TH STREET, KESSLER IN CARE OF RG DEVELOPMENTER
>> 211163. THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY HAROLD KESSLER ESTATE IN CARE OF RG DEVELOPER INC..
VIOLATION OF PERMIT REQUIRED AND ENTERED OCTOBER 20TH, 2021 AND AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE RECORDED DECEMBER 20TH OF 2021.
AFTER THE PERMITS HAD BEEN ISSUED THERE WAS AN AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE ON MARCH 31ST OF 2021.
THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINES ACCRUED FROM DECEMBER 20TH THROUGH MARCH 21ST WERE $9940 WITH $40 BEING RECORDING FEES.
THIS IS A FINE REDUCTION REQUEST.
THE RESPONDENT REQUESTS THAT THE FINES BE COMPLETELY WAIVED.
THERE'S THREE CRITERIA TO CONSIDER IN THE REDUCTION OF FINES. ONE THE GRAVITY OR THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE VIOLATION IS MINIMAL.
NUMBER TWO, ANY ACTIONS TAKEN TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS.
THE OWNER OBTAINED DEMOLITION PERMIT ON FEBRUARY 10TH AND RECEIVED FINAL APPROVED INSPECTIONS.
NUMBER THREE THE NUMBER OF THE TIMES THE OWNER WAS FOUND IN VIOLATION OR OTHERWISE, ADMITTED GUILTY HAS BEEN ZERO TIMES.
STAFF HAS CALCULATED THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS TO BE $1073 AND 80 CENTS. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE STAFF RECOMMENDS TO REDUCE THE FINES FOM $9940 TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE
COST OF $1073 AND 80 CENTS. >> ALRIGHT.
>> NOT AT THIS TIME, THANK YOU. >> STATE YOUR NAME.
>> WILLIAM DAWSON. >> YOU HEARD THE CITY REQUEST THAT THE REDUCTION BE FROM $9940 TO $1072 AND 40 CENTS.
[01:30:12]
>> YES, BUT I STILL LIKE TO GIVE YOU A COPY OF THIS.
>> YES. GIVE IT TO THE CITY ATTORNEY.
>> YOU CAN GIVE THAT AND WE'LL MAKE THIS RESPONDENT EXHIBIT
ONE. >> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WERE IN VIOLATION DUE TO NO PERMIT BECAUSE I DO HAVE AN ACTIVE PERMIT SINCE 2018 AT THE
PROPERTY SO YES. >> I WAS HAVING PROBLEMS WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT AND THEY ASKED ME TO DEMOLITION THE PROPERTY AND WE WENT IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSIONER'S MEETING AND THEY GAVE ME TIME TO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OR KNOCK IT DOWN.
WHEN WE LOOK IT'S TOUGH SO WE GO AHEAD AND KNOCK IT DOWN DUE TO THIS AND SO I DON'T DO IT BY PURPOSE JUST SNEAK AROUND AND KNOCK IT DOWN, BUT AGAIN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IS LIKE MY FAMILY AND WE LOVE EVERYONE IN THERE SO I'M IN AGREEMENT WITH
>> THANK YOU. THESE WILL BE ADMITTED AS EXHIBIT 1. AND SO TO MAKE THIS CLEAR, YOU ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY'S REQUEST TO AGREE TO REDUCE THE
FINE TO $1073 AND 40 CENTS? >> YES.
>> AND I THINK YOU ABOUT THE KIND COMMENTS ABOUT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THANK YOU. THEY HAVE THEIR HANDS FULL RIGHT NOW WITH ALL THE CONSTRUCTION GOING ON AND OF COURSE THE SHORTAGE OF LABOR AND MATERIALS SO THINGS ARE TAKING A LONGER THAN NORMAL NOW. ALRIGHT.
BASED ON THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTY I'LL REDUCE THE FINE FROM $9940 TO $4073 AND 80 CENTS. HOW MUCH TIME YOU NEED TO PAY
>> I'LL GIVE YOU 30 DAYS TO PAY. >> THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE? PER THE ORDER, WILL THE FINES GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT IF
IT'S NOT PAID. >> MR. DAWSON, IF YOU DON'T PAY THAT WITHIN 30 DAYS THE FINES WILL GO BACK UP TO THE 9,000
>> NEXT CASE? >> THE NEXT CASE IS 8E, 21
21-2803,. >> DID YOU WANT TO CALL 1104 MAYFLOWER ROAD, AS WELL OR WOULD YOU LIKE TO HEAR THE 1305
DELAWARE AVENUE CASE? >> WE'LL DO 5.
THANK YOU MR. SHAUN COSS. MR. GERBER YOU HAVE ANYTHING
ELSE?>> NOPE. >> BASED ON THE TESTIMONY PREVIOUSLY GIVEN BY YOU IN THIS CASE I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT LARESTE JUSTIN IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION AND YOU ARE HERE TODAY AS HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE AS HIS GRANDSON, YOU WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL THAT CASE. ANYTHING FURTHER ON THAT CASE?
[E. 21-2803 1305 Delaware Avenue Lareste, Justin Logan Winn]
>> NO, MA'AM. >> NEXT CASE, MADAM CLERK?
8E. 21- 21-2807, 1305 DELAWARE AVENUE. WHEN YOU ARE READY.
>> 21-2803, 1305 DELAWARE AVENUE.
[01:35:06]
CASE WAS INITIATED OCTOBER 18TH, 2021.VIOLATION IS 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED.
FINDINGS IN ORDER. THE ORDER DETERMINING THE VIOLATION IS MARCH 16TH, 2022. AN AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE WAS ISSUED ON MAY 23RD OF 2022. MARCH 15TH, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOUND A VIOLATION EXISTED AND GAVE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT.
NUMBER TWO NO PERMIT WAS OBTAINED AND AFFIDAVIT OF KNOWLEDGE COMPLIANCE WAS ON MAY 23RD AND FINES BEGAN.
AS OF JUNE 15TH, FINES TOTAL $2023 INCLUDING A $20 RECORDING FEE. AS OF NOW NO PERMIT HAS BEEN
APPLIED FOR. >> AT THIS POINT WE'RE REQUESTING THE LIEN BE ENTERED, CORRECT? WE'RE CHANGING THE PROCEDURE TO HAVE A HEARING PRIOR TO IMPOSEING THE LIEN AND HAVING THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ORDER THE LIEN AS APPOSED TO DOING IT ON PAPER SO THIS IS A REQUEST FOR THE LIEN TO BE IMPOSED BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT COMPLIED WITH THE
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ORDERS. >> MR. GERBER YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT WENT ON HERE, HOW DO YOU RESPOND?
>> I GOT NOTHING TO SAY. >> THERE WILL BE A LIEN PUT ON
YOUR PROPERTY. >> JUST PAY THE MONEY AND THEY
TAKE IT OFF. >> IF YOU DO WHAT YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO DO YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO PAY MONEY.
YOU ARE FILLING IN FOR YOUR GRANDDAD AGAIN.
>> I HAVE TO GO, MA'AM. >> WELL IF YOU BE QUIET, I COULD FIN FINISH.
>> ALRIGHT. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT THEY'RE NOT IN COMPLIANCE AND I WILL IMPOSE AN ORDER PLACING A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY AT 1305 DELAWARE AVENUE. 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[B. 21-1226 2510 Delaware Avenue Vaandering, Edward Edward Smith]
>> NEXT CASE? >> 8 B, CASE 21-1226, 2510 DELAWARE AVENUE AND THIS IS FOR DELAWARE AVENUE AND IT'S OWNED BY EDWARD VAANDERING. WHEN THIS AGENDA WAS PUBLISHED THIS CASE WAS IN VIOLATION, BUT NOW SINCE IT'S BEEN REINSPECTED AND IS NOW IN COMPLIANCE SO WE'RE TREATING THIS AS A MASSIE CASE. THEY WERE THE INTERNATIONAL MAINTENANCE CODE INFESTATION AND DRAINAGE.
INTERIOR SURFACES AND 604.3 ELECTRICAL HAZARDS.
THIS CAME BEFORE YOU NOVEMBER 1TH, 2021.
AN EXTENSION OF TIME WAS GRANTED IN 2022 AND AN AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE STARTING FINES WAS RECORDED ON MAY FIFTH, 2022.
FINE AS CREWED FROM MAY FIFTH TO JUNE 15TH OF 022 TOTALLING $4430 INCLUDING $30 IN RECORDING FEES. THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS REQUESTED ALL FINES BE WAIVED. STAFF CALCULATED THE COST TO BE $1085 AND 60 CENTS. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE COST OF $1086
AND 86 CENTS. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> MR. VAANDERING THANK YOU FOR BEING SO PATIENT.
HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE COMMENTS MADE BY MR. SHAUN COSS?
>> WELL, I RESPOND THAT THIS IS A DIFFICULT TIME THAT SUDDENLY ONE DAY I FIND MYSELF WITH THREE EVICTIONS, EVICTIONS ALWAYS LEAD
[01:40:05]
TO CODE CASES SO I HAD THREE LISTS OF THREE DIFFERENT PLACES AND I HAVE TWO OF THEM DONE. I'M WORKING ON THE LAST ONE.MY MAIN PURPOSE HERE IS I NOTIFIED THE DEPARTMENT, AS I NOTIFIED EVERYBODY WHEN A CASE IS CLOSED AND WHEN THE CASE IS CLOSED IT'S DUE FOR INSPECTIONS AND THEY ALWAYS TAKE TIME.
WEEK-TO-WEEK, THREE WEEKS SOMETIMES.
I NOTIFIED THEM ON THE 13TH OF MAY, THE FIRST TIME THAT I NOTIFIED THEM. THERE WITH OTHER TIMES.
THE 13TH OF MAY THAT THE JOB WAS COMPLETED.
LIKE THE LAST 25 YEARS, I TRIED TO DO THE RIGHT THING.
I SAT BACK AND I WAITED. BOTTOM LINE IS TIME WENT BY AND TIME WENT BY AND TIME WENT BY. SUDDENLY LAST WEEK I SAID, HEY, THIS CASE IS DONE. IT'S BEEN DONE SINCE THE 13TH.
OKAY WE'LL GET AN INSPECTOR, WELL WE GOT ONE.
MY THING IS WHY AM I BILLED $100 A DAY FROM THE 13TH OF LAST MONTH TO THE 21ST OF THIS MONTH? IT ALWAYS TAKES TIME TO GET AN INSPECTOR, BUT NEVER HAVE I CALLED AND GOT ONE THE NEXT DAY.
MY THING IS I THINK I OWE ABOUT 7-DAYS AND AFTER I DID THE RIGHT THING AND LOOKED AFTER EVERYBODY FOR THE LAST 25 YEARS, I NEED A LITTLE BIT OF HELP HERE. I CAN'T AFFORD THIS.
ON THE 13TH I CALLED IN AND SAID HEY, THIS JOB IS NOW READY.
THEY'RE BUSY. I'VE DONE THIS FOR 25 YEARS AND THERE'S NEVER BEEN A PROBLEM. IF IT'S CLOSED TWO OR THREE OR FOUR WEEKS LATER IT'S OKAY AND SOMETIMES I'VE HAD TO WAIT ON THREE OR FOUR CALLS, BUT THIS IS THE TIME I WAS ON THE $100 A DAY DEAL AND I'M BEING BILLED BECAUSE THERE WAS NO INSPECTOR FROM THE 13TH TO THE 21ST? I'M CONCERNED.
I ALWAYS DO THE RIGHT THING. I'VE BEEN A LANDLORD FOR 25 YEARS AND I WANT TO THANK EVER EVERYBODY, ESPECIALLY ELIZABETH WHO HAS WORKED WITH ME WHO IS PROFESSIONAL AND HAS HELPED ME MANY, MANY TIMES.
I WANT TO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALL YOUR HELP AND SHE'S GIVEN ME PLENTY. THIS TIME I NEED A LITTLE BIT OF HELP WITH 4,000 DOLLARS BECAUSE OF A CASE THAT WASN'T CLOSED FOR A MONTH AND A HALF BECAUSE NOBODY WAS THERE TO CLOSE IT.
WHY WOULD I BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE $100 A DAY? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME I'VE BEEN HERE IN 25 YEARS AND I'VE HAD A LOT OF HELP FROM EVERYBODY AND I HAD NO IDEA THAT I WOULD BE LOOK AT THREE DIFFERENT EVICTIONS WHICH ARE ALWAYS AN ATTACHED AN OWNER RELATIONS CASE AND I'M HERE BY MYSELF, THE HOUSES ARE UP FOR SALE AND THEY GOT TO GO AND I'M GETTING TOO OLD TO MAINTAIN THEM PROPERLY, BUT I DO THE RIGHT THING. I FINISHED TWO OF THE THREE CASES AND THE THIRD ONE IS ALMOST DONE.
I WENT WHERE WE HAD TO GO AND I'M ASKING FOR HELP WITH THIS PLUS, THE SEVEN DAYS THAT I'M REALLY LATE.
PLEASE REVIEW IT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
WHATEVER YOUR RESULTS ARE. >> THANK YOU.
SO FROM MAY 3RD THROUGH THE 21ST?
OR WAS THAT JUNE? >> MAY THE 13TH I CALLED IN AND SAID IT'S READY FOR AN INSPECTION AND AFTER ANOTHER CALL, NO RESULTS AND EVERYONE IS BUSY AND DOING SOMETHING AND FINALLY ON THE 21ST I SAID JUST A REMINDER, THIS PLACE IS DONE.
IT'S READY FOR INSPECTION. I GOT AN INSPECTION RIGHT AWAY.
I'M BILLED FROM THE 13TH OF MAY ADD TO THE 21ST ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS A DAY AND I'D LIKE YOU TO RECONSIDER THAT CHARGE
PLEASE. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IF I CAN HAVE MR. SHAUN COSS ADDRESS THE BREAKDOWN OF WHAT HE'S
REQUESTED? >> STAFF HAS CONFIRMED THAT MR.
[01:45:02]
VAANDERING DID CONTACT THE OFFICE ON MAY 13TH.HAD THE FINES RAN THEY WOULD BE $100 PER DAY.
STAFF IS PREPARED TO REVISE THE RECOMMENDED REDUCTION LOOKING AT THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS. IN THIS CASE IF STAFF WERE TO REMOVE THE FEES FOR THE 12 MONTHS THE CASE WAS OPENED OF $600 THAT WOULD LOWER IT TO $586 AND 60 CENTS WHICH IS STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATION. >> MR. VAANDERING DID YOU HEAR
THAT? >> I'M SORRY, I DIDN'T HEAR THAT. THIS IS ONLY MY SECOND TIME HERE IN 25 YEARS. I MUST HAVE A HEARING PROBLEM BECAUSE I CAN'T HEAR WHAT YOU ARE SEE SAYING.
IT MUST BE MY PROBLEM. >> WE'LL TRY TO HELP YOU.
>> MAYBE EYE I NEED TO SEE AN EAR DOCTOR.
>> MR. SHAUN COSS COULD YOU REPEAT YOUR FINDINGS?
>> IF YOU CAN'T HEAR MR. SHAUN COSS WE'LL TELL HIM TO SPEAK
OKAY SO HAVE THE FINES RAN FROM MAY 13TH TO AND THE $100 A DAY.
I HAVE CONFIRM YOU'D CONTACTED OUR OFFICE ON MAY 13TH SO MY RECOMMENDATION IS TO LOOK AT THE ADMINISTRATIVE COST OF $1165 AND 86 CENTS AND REMOVE THE FEE ASSOCIATED WITH EVERY MONTH THAT THE CASE IS OPEN. BY REMOVING THAT FEE THAT REDUCES THE FINES TO $565 AND 86 CENTS AND THAT'S MY RECOMMENDATION TO REDUCE THE FINES TO THAT AMOUNT.
>> I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT. IF THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS, I REALLY
THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU.
>> WELL BASED ON THE STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES THE FINE WILL BE SET AT $565 AND 86 CENTS.
HOW MUCH TIME? CAN YOU PAY THAT IN 60 DAY?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WE'LL GIVE YOU 60 DAYS TO PAY IT IF YOU DON'T PAY IT WITHIN THAT IT WILL REVERT BACK TO THE
HIGHER AMOUNT. >> IT'LL BE PAID.
>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH.
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. >> THANK YOU FOR ELIZABETH.
SHE'S HELPED ME FOR YEARS NOW. I RECOMMEND HER AND I WILL SAY THIS. SHE'S PROFESSIONAL.
SHE'S HONEST AND SINCERE AND DOES A HELL OF A JOB.
>> THANK YOU. >> SHE'S GOOD TO ME TOO.
>> SHE'S ALWAYS BEEN VERY HELPFUL.
>> YES, SHE IS.>> FOR 25 YEARS. DURING THE TIME SHE WAS WITH ME.
THANK YOU.>> FOR 25 YEARS. DURING THE TIME SHE WAS WITH ME.
THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU FOR THE
[K. 22-98 1005 N 14th St Dacres, Barrington Edward Smith]
COMPLIMENTS. NEXT CASE?>> SO WE'RE GOING TO READ IN 5K, 22-98, 1005 NORTH 14TH STREET,
DACRES IS THE OWNER. >> TODAY WE HAVE CASE NUMBER 22-98, 1005 NORTH 14TH STREET. BARRINGTON DACRES IS THE OWNER.
CASE WAS INITIATED JANUARY 7TH OF 2022.
VIOLATIONS ARE FBC 105.1, 2017 PERMIT REQUIRED, IPMC 504.1, PERMIT OF PLUMBING FIXTURES. 305.2, STRUCTURAL MEMBERS.
305.3, INTERIOR SURFACE, 304.7, ROOFS AND DRAINAGE.
30.1, INFESTATION, 304 POINT 13, WINDOWS DOORS AND FRAMES.
[01:50:04]
CORRECTIVE ACTION IS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE WATER HEATER, INSTALLED WITHOUT A PERMIT AND OTHER INTERIOR PLUMBING ALTERATIONS AND OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR CONVERTING A SINGLE FAMILY HOME INTO A SIX LIVING UNIT AND REPAIR AND REPLACE TOILETS NOT WORKING PROPERLY AND REPAIR SHOWER FIXTURES THAT ARE LOOSE.REPAIR AND REPLACE THE REAR DOOR, REAR PATIO FLOOR AND THE SURROUNDING STRUCTURES THAT WERE WEAK OR ROTTING.
REPAIR AND REPLACE PATIO OR ROOF THAT'S LEAKING AND ROTTING.
TREAT PROPERTY FOR INFESTATION OF PESTS.
REPAIR AND REPLACE EXTERIOR DOORS THAT ARE NOT CLOSING PROPERLY AND REPAIR AND REPLACE WINDOWS NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. RECOMMENDATION THE CITY REQUESTS THAT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATIONS EXIST AND THE VIOLATIONS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO GET A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRES INSPECTIONS FOR AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL PERMIT IS CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT FOR OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED. THERE WERE NO PERMITS ON FILE OR
>> I HAVE PICTURES. >> PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION AS YOU OBSERVED THEM? AT THIS TIME THE CITY WILL MOVE EVIDENCE INTO COMPOSITE ONE.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO. ARE THERE TENANTS IS IN THIS UN UNIT?
>> YES. THIS WAS ACTUALLY A TENANT
COMPLAINT. >> AND YOU SAY THIS WAS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME THAT WAS CONVERTED INTO SIX LIVING UNIT?
I FIND THAT THERE IS NO ONE HERE ON BEHALF OF BARRINGTON DACRES.
IF I DIDN'T SAY SO THESE WILL BE ADMITTED AS STATE'S EXHIBIT ONE.
BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 1005 NORTH 14TH STREET AND THAT BARRINGTON DACRES IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I WILL GIVE HIM 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 100 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT IS CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED AND HE'S GOT 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[A. 21-908 302 S 21st Street Garcia, Javier & Esther Ed Smith]
>> DON'T GO AWAY YET. WE HAVE CASE 8A.
2 21 21-908, 429 NORTH 20TH STREET UNIT A AND JAVIER AND ESTHER
GARCIA ARE THE OWNERS. >> WE HAVE 21-980, BETWEEN BET NORTH 20TH STREET UNIT A WE HAVE THE CASE THAT WAS INITIATED APRIL 27TH, 2021.
VIOLATION 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED. ORDER THE PERMITS WERE APPLIED FOR ON 122121 AND LAST CONTACT WAS ON 2/24/22.
[01:55:04]
THE OWNER WAS TOLD WHAT WAS NEEDED FOR THE PERMIT, BUT THERE WAS NO RESPONSE. AND I HAVE PICTURES.>> WE'RE REQUESTING A LIEN BE IMPOSEED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE'S ORDER?
>> YES. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, IT SAYS SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING WAS ON OCTOBER 19TH OF 2021 AND IT WAS FOUND VIOLATION EXISTED AND PROVIDED 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT OR $100 A DAY BE ACCRUED AND NOTICE WAS GIVEN ON JANUARY 3RD OF 2022. NO PERMITS WERE OBTAINED AND THERE WAS AN AFFIDAVIT FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ON MAY 25TH AND FINES BEGAN AS OF JUNE 15TH. THE FINE TOTAL AS OF TODAY IS 20. $2130 INCLUDING A $30 RECORDING
FEE. >> ARE THOSE PHOTOGRAPHS FROM INITIAL VIOLATION OR SUBSEQUENT TO THAT FINDING? HAVE YOU GONE BACK OUT TO THE PROPERTY?
>> NO. >> SO THOSE ARE THE ORIGINAL VIOLATION PHOTOGRAPHS? THOSE WILL ALREADY BE IN THE FILE. WE'RE ASKING FOR AN ORDER TO IMPOSE THE LIEN SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
>> THANK YOU. I FIND THAT NEITHER JAVIER ORRESTER GARCIA IS PRESENT AND BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AND PREVIOUSLY PRESENTED I FIND THEY ARE THE PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS VIOLATION AND I'LL IMPOSE A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2130 INCLUDING $30 FOR THE COST OF RECORDING FEES. THEY HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[C. 21-3322 504 N 26th St Unit B Yas Holdings LLC Frank Remling]
>> THE NEXT CASE IS 5C, 504 NORTH 26TH STREET UNIT B, YAS
HOLDINGS LLC IS THE OWNER. >> THIS IS 21-2867.
YO 504 NORTH 26TH STREET UNIT B, YAS HOLDINGS LLC. THE VIOLATION IS IPMC 309.1, 2021, INFESTATION. IPMC 505.4, WATER HEATER FACILITIES. IPMC, 504.1, PLUMBING.
IPMC 605.1, ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.
>> 605.4, WIRING, 105.1, PERMIT REQUIRED.
THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, TREAT PROPERTY FOR INFESTATION AND SUPPLY DWELLING WITH HOT WATER AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO NON-WORKING PLUMBING FIXTURES AND ELECTRICAL REPAIRS TO MAKE ELECTRICAL PANEL SAFE AND MAKE SAFE THE TANKLESS WATER HEATER THAT'S CAUSING THE BREAKER TO TRIP AND OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE WATER HEATER INSTALLED WITHOUT A PERMIT.
I HAVE PICTURES OF ALL OF THE AB
ABOVE. >> YOU WANT TO SUBMIT THE
YES DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICTED?
>> WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. >> THERE'S NO REQUEST FOR REINSPECTION FOR OTHER VIOLA
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
>> I FIND THAT THERE'S NO ONE HERE ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERS, BUT I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 256 UNIT B AND THEY'RE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION AND I'LL GIVE THEM 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND A PERMIT, AT
[02:00:05]
LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT CURE ALL VIOLATIONS IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED.THEY HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE?
>> OKAY OUR NEXT CASE IS BY TELEPHONE.
[I. 21-3631 2510 Sunrise Blvd Delaney, Frank Logan Winn]
IT WILL BE FOR CASE 5I, 21-2631, 2510 SUNRISE BOULEVARD, FRANK DELANEY IS THE OWNER AND THAT'S WHO I WILL BE CALLING.>> YES. >> THIS IS ELIZABETH WITH THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
YOU ARE IN AUDIO ATTENDANCE OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING.
CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY? >> I CAN.
>> FOR TESTIMONY THAT YOU'LL PROVIDE I HAVE TO SWEAR YOU IN SO IF YOU COULD RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND? DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU PROVIDE WILL BE
>> GOOD MORNING. I'M FRAN ROSS, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THE PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE CITY WILL BE MADE
BY LOGAN LOGAN WINN. >> WE HAVE 2510 SUNRISE BOULEVARD. INITIATED DECEMBER 17TH, 2021.
THE OWNER IS FRANK DELANEY WHO LIVED IN FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA.
105.1 VIOLATION, PERMIT REQUIRED.
OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR RENOVATION WORK, DRY WALL, WINDOW AND A C INSTALLATION AND ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING BEING DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. THEY NEED AN AC PERMIT TO COMPLY IT WAS REJECTED IN PLAN REVIEW RIGHT NOW, BUT ALL THE OTHER PLANS HAVE BEEN APPROVED AT THIS TIME.
I HAVE A SET OF PICTURES FOR WHAT WAS DONE.
>> OKAY. >> TO THE PHOTOGRAPHS CLEARLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT AS YOU SAW THEM?
>> ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?
MR. DELANEY HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE ALLEGATIONS?
>> WELL, ONCE WE WERE NOTIFIED THAT WE HAD TO STOP WORK AND GET PERMITS WE DID THAT. I THOUGHT WE HAD THEM ALL INCLUDING THE AC, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE A COMMUNICATION PROBLEM ON MY END. WHEN I FGOT THE NOTICE TO APPEA BEFORE YOU I CAME INTO THE CITY AND TALKED TO SOME PEOPLE IN TTHERE AND WAS INFORMED THE AC PERMIT WAS NOT INITIATED, SO I CONTACTED MIA C CONTRACTOR AND THEN THERE WAS A BIT OF A COMMUNICATION PROBLEM AND HE TOLD ME THATMY AC CONTRACTOR AN THEN THERE WAS A BIT OF A COMMUNICATION PROBLEM AND HE TOLD ME THAT THE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT WAS NOT RIGHT SO I GOT HIM TO DO THAT AND FOUND OUT NEXT WEEK IT WAS NOT PAID FOR AND I HAD TO GET THEM TO PAY FOR IT IT. ME AS ASSURED ME WE WOULD BE IN COMPLIANCE BEFORE THIS HEARING HOWEVER WE RAN INTO THE HOLIDAY YESTERDAY AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS HE'S BEEN IN CONTACT, I HOPE THIS IS TRUE. BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THE INSPECTOR AND THEY'RE WORKING THROUGH WHATEVER THE TECHNICAL ISSUE IS THAT NEED AS TO BE RESOLVEED TO GET THAT PERMIT IN THE MEANTIME WE HAVE STOPPED ALL WORK AND HAVE NOT DONE WORK ON
[02:05:04]
THAT HOUSE IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS.>> ALRIGHT. ANYTHING FURTHER? ARE YOU IN THE PROCESS OF PULLING PERMITS, MR. DELANEY?
>> WELL, YES. ALL THE PERMITS WERE PULLED.
THE ONLY ONE THAT WASN'T WAS THE AC AND WE DID PULL THAT, WELL I DON'T KNOW IF PULL IS THE RIGHT TERM, BUT WE APPLIED FOR IT AND EVIDENTLY THIS WAS A WEEK OR TWO AGO.
EVERYTHING WAS DONE TO MY KNOWLEDGE AND RECENTLY I FOUND OUT THE PERMIT WAS NOT ISSUED BECAUSE I WAS INFORMED BY MY GUY THAT IT WAS A TECHNICAL ISSUE IN THE PAPERWORK AND HE WAS RESOLVING THAT WITH THE INSPECTOR, SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS ASIDE FROM THIS TECHNICAL GLITCH WE COULD BE IN
COMPLIANCE. >> DID HE TELL YOU HOW MUCH TIME WHEN HE NEEDED TO CORRECT THAT GLI
GLITCH? >> HE BEING THE INSPECTOR OR MY
CONTRACTOR? >> YOUR AC CONTRACTOR THAT'S
WORKING ON GETTING THE PERMITS? >> HE TOLD ME THAT HE WAS, NO, HE PROBABLY HAD IT RESOLVED BY TODAY, BUT OF COURSE WE FORGOT ABOUT THE HOLIDAY YESTERDAY SO I'M ASSUMING HE'LL BE WORKING TO DAY. I WOULD CERTAINLY CONTACT HIM TO TODAY.
>> THANK YOU. HE HAS PULLED ALL THE OTHER
>> OKAY. >> WHAT I'M INCLINED TO DO THE CONTINUE THIS FOR 30 DAYS TO SEE IF IN FACT, THE CONTRACTOR PULLS THE PERMIT BECAUSE HE'S IN COMPLIANCE WITH EVERYTHING ELSE.
I DON'T WANT TO FINE HIM ON THIS BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE HE'S TRYING AND MR. DELANEY YOU WILL BE HEARING FROM THE CODE BOARD.
THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ABOUT, YOU KNOW CHECK WITH THEM TO SEE IF THE PERMIT HAS BEEN PULLED BECAUSE THE YOU GET IT, THIS
>> IF YOU DON'T THIS COULD RESULT IN YOU BEING FINED AND SINCE YOU HAVE PULLED THE OTHER ONES I HAVE NO DOUBT YOU CAN'T
GET THIS ONE TAKEN CARE OF TOO. >> I WILL DO IT.
[A. 21-2153 2707 Dunbar Street Sirmons, Denise Logan Winn]
>> NEXT CASE IS 5A 21-2153, DUNBAR STREET.
DENISE SIRMONS IS THE OPENER. >> SHE IS OF 170 SOUTH DARCI ROAD. THE VIOLATION WAS 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED. OBTAINING A PERMIT FOR REPLACING WINDOWS AND A FRONT DOOR AND ENCLOSURE OF A DOOR WITHOUT A PERMIT. THE PERMIT WAS APPLIED FOR AND DID NOT INCLUDE THE WINDOW IN FILL WHERE THEY BLOCKED UP THE WINDOW. NO PERMIT REVISION HAS BEEN RECEIVED FOR THIS WORK. I BELIEVE THIS BEEN AT
MAGISTRATE PREVIOUSLY. >> I BELIEVE SO, AS WELL.
THIS IS RECALLED. >> THE THING IS SHE'S ALWAYS BEEN HERE AND I REMEMBER ONE TIME SHE CAME IN AND SHE HAD MOVED FROM THIS PORT ST. LUCIE ADDRESS TO THE DUNBAR ADDRESS.
>> WE SENT TO BOTH ADDRESSES. >> ALRIGHT.
[02:10:06]
BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT DENISE SIRMONS IS NOT PRESENT THIS MORNING.>> I DON'T THINK WE MOVED THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE.
I DON'T THINK WE DID JUST TO BE SAFE DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS.
WE'LL MOVE THEM IN AT THIS TIME. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND SHE'S THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR IT C. SHE'LL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 UNTIL THE PERMIT IS CLOSED AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED AND SHE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[D. 21-3391 214 Manatee Ln High Point of Ft Pierce Condominium Section 1 Logan Winn]
21-3391, 214 MANATEE LANE, CONDOMINIUM SECTION 1.
>> CASE 21-3391, 214 MANATEE LANE.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED NOVEMBER 3RD OF 2021.
HIGH POINT CONDOMINIUM IS THE OWNER OF 214 MANATEE LANE.
VIOLATION 105.1, PERMIT REQUIRED.
THE CORRECTIVE TAX TO OBTAIN PERMIT FOR THE PAVING AND STRIPING DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. AS OF NOW THERE IS NO PERMIT.
I DO HAVE PICTURES OF THE VIOL
VIOLATION. >> THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS
COMPOSITE ONE THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. THANK YOU.
>> IT WAS? DID THEY OBTAIN A PERMIT AFTER
THE FACT? >> THIS COMMUNITY IS DIVIDED IN THREE SUB-SECTIONS AND TWO OUT OF THE THREE ARE THE ONES THAT ACTUALLY HAD THE STRIPING AND SEAL COATING DONE AND THIS IS ONE THAT HAS NOT OBTAINED AND THERE'S ANOTHER SECTION THAT'S CURRENTLY DOING THE SAME PROCESS.
>> OKAY. >> BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 214 MANATEE LANE, HIGH POINT OF FT. PIERCE CONDOMINIUM SECTION 1, THAT THEY'RE T PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
THEY HAVE 60 DAYS TO GET A PERMIT AND PAY FOR REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT IS CLOSED AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS IN THE NOT REQUIRING OF A PERMIT.
OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED.
[E. 21-3582 4919 - 4921 Oleander Ave Midway Road Plaza LLC Logan Winn]
THANK YOU. >> NEXT CASE IS 5E, 21-3528, 4919-4921 OLEANDER AVENUE. MIDWAY ROAD PLAZA LLC IS THE OW OWNER.
>> WHEN YOU ARE READY. >> 21-3582, FOR THE ADDRESS OF 4919-4921 OLEANDER AVENUE. CASE WAS INITIATED DECEMBER 14TH OF 2021. THE OWNER IS MIDWAY ROAD PLAZA L.L.C. OF 630 SOUTHWEST PALMETTO CODE IN ST. LUCY, FLORIDA.
NUMBER TWO IS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR BUSINESS CHANGE OF YUCHLTS AS OF NOW THE PERMIT HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR ON 6/14 IS STILL IN REVIEW. I DO HAVE SOME PICTURES OF THE
[02:15:02]
>> THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION
AS YOU OBSERVED IT? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> THE CITY WILL MOVE IN EVIDENCE EXHIBIT ONE THE
PHOTOGRAPHS. >> BEFORE I DO THAT THIS IS IN
>> SHOULD WE CONTINUE IT TO SEE WHAT THE REVIEW IS DOING?
>> IT'S UP TO YOU. I MEAN I DON'T WANT TO RULE HERE AND THEN THEY GRANT SOMETHING AND WE HAVE TO COME BACK AND HAVE TO UNDO WHAT WE PROBABLY SHOULD NOT HAVE DONE BECAUSE THERE'S NOT A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON THEIR BEHALF, BUT IT'S
NOT OUR PROBLEM THOUGH. >> IF THEY OBTAIN IT THROUGH A REVIEW THAT WOULD SATISFY ANY FINDINGS BUT IF MR. SHAUN COSS
HAS ANYTHING? >> THERE IS, THIS VIOLATION HAS BEEN ON-GOING SINCE DECEMBER. WE'VE WORKED WITH THE APPLICANTS TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITIES. STAFF RECOMMENDS AN ORDER FOR
VIOLATION TODAY. >> AGAIN FOR THE RECORD THERE'S NO ONE HERE ON BEHALF OF MIDWAY ROAD PLAZA LLC HOWEVER BASED ON THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE PRESENTED I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THEY HAVE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS A DAY BE ASSESSED AND THEY HAVE 30
[G. 21-3587 4150 Okeechobee Rd #B 4150 Plaza LLC Logan Winn]
DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE.>> 5G, 21-3587, 4150 OKEECHOBEE ROAD NUMBER B.
4150 PLAZA LLC IS THE OWNER. >> WHEN YOU ARE READY.
>> CASE 21-3587 FOR 4150 OKEECHOBEE ROAD NUMBER B.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED DECEMBER 14TH OF 2021.
THE OWNER IS 4150 PLAZA LLC OF 1946 HARRISON STREET OF HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA, 33020, THE VIOLATION IS 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IS TO PEAR OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR REPLACING AC UNITS WITHOUT A PERMIT.
THERE'S NO PERMIT THAT'S BEEN APPLIED FOR.
I DO HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE AIR-CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT.
>> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY DEPICT WHAT YOU SAW?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> I WILL ADMIT THESE.
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
ALRIGHT. THEN PACED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 4150 OKEECHOBEE ROAD NUMBER B AND THAT THE OWN ER IS 4150 PLAZA LLC. I'LL GIVE THEM 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATION IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 BE ASSESSED AND THEY HAVE
[J. 21-3678 2801 Citrus Ave Hatfield, James Logan Winn]
30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE?>> NEXT CASE IS 5J, 21-3678, 2801 CITRUS AVENUE, JAMES
HATFIELD IS THE OWNER. >> WHEN YOU ARE READY?
>> CASE 2121-3678, 2801 CITRUS AVENUE.
INITIATED IN FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA.
VIOLA VIOL VIOLATIONS 301.13 WINDOWS AND DOORS.
INTERIOR SURFACES. 309 POINT 1, INFESTATION.
505. 4, WATER HEATER FACILITIES. 605.1 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IS TO MAKE REPAIRS IN CRACKS IN CEILING, REPLACE WATER HEATING THAT LEAKS AND CORRECTIONS TO THE BACKDOOR THAT'S NOT SEALED PROPERLY. MAKE ELECTRICAL REPAIRS AND A
[02:20:06]
BROKEN LIGHT FIXTURE. MAKE REPAIRS TO OPEN CAVITY IN THE WALL UNDER THE SINK AND TREAT THE PROPERTY FOR BAT INFESTATION. NO PERMIT OR CONTACT FOR REINSPECTION HAS OCCURRED. I HAVE NUMEROUS PICTURES OF THEPROPERTY. >> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION AS YOU OBSERVED THEM?
>> YES, THEY DO. >> AT THIS I'M THE CITY WILL
ADMIT THESE. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER.
I DO NOT SEE MR. HATFIELD NOR A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON HIS BEHALF. HOWEVER BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT HE'S THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I WILL GIVE HIM 0 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED.
HE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE?
[C. 21-2357 305 S 24th Street FL Conference Association Seventh Day Adventists Logan Winn]
>> THE NEXT CASE IS, 5C, 21-2357 SOUTH 24TH STREET.
>> IT'S 8 C. >> SORRY IT'S 8 C.
>> THANK YOU. WHEN YOU ARE READY.
CASE 21726. THE OWNER IS FLORIDA CONFERENCE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS. VIOLATION WAS FBC 101 PERMIT REQUIRED. THE ORDER DETERMINING THE VIOLATION WAS MARCH 16TH, 2022. AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE MAY 23RD OF 2022. ACTION DATES.
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING FOUND A VIOLATION EXISTED AND PROVIDED 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY WILL BE A CREWED. NO PERMIT WAS APPLIED FOR SO AN AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE WAS ISSUED AND FINES BEGAN.
FINES TOTAL $2320 INCLUDING A $20 RECORDING FEE.
THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO IMPOSE A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
>> I FIND THAT THE FLORIDA CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION ADVENTIST IS NOT PRESENT NEITHER IS THERE A REPRESENTATIVE ON THEIR BEHALF HERE, BUT BASED ON THE EVIDENCE I FIND A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THEY'RE THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I WILL IMPOSE A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2320, BUT DO YOU WANT ME TO STATE THAT BECAUSE IT'S ON-GOING?
>> IT WILL BE ON-GOING. >> THAT IS THE AMOUNT, BUT THE LIEN AND THE FINE IS ON-GOING. THANK YOU.
[D. 21-3327 507 Wendell Road Calderon, Eleanor Shaun Coss]
NEXT CASE? >> THE LAST CASE IS 8 D CASE 21 21-1161 ELEANOR ROAD, ELEANOR CALDERONE IS THE OWNER. THIS IS THE OWNER FROM FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED ON NOVEMBER 18TH, 2021. VIOLATIONS ARE 501.1, PERMIT REQUIRED. AN AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED ON MAY 23RD, 2022 ISSUING $100 PER DAY.
AS OF JUNE 15TH, 2022 THE FINES TOTAL $2023.
AS OF TODAY THERE ARE NO PERMITS TO CURE THE VIOLATION AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO IMPOSE A LEAN ON THE PROPERTY.
>> I WILL IMPOSE A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY AGAIN FOR THE RECORD ELLEN CALDERON IS NOT PRESENT NEITHER IS THERE A REPRESENTATIVE ON HER BEHALF. THE LIEN IS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2023 AND THAT IN CHEW AS $20 RECORDING FEEL.
[L. 22-735 723 High Point Blvd High Point of Ft Pierce Section 2 Logan Winn]
[02:25:04]
THERE'S 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU.
>> REGARDING CASE 5 WILL, 22-735 S 22-735, 723 HIGH POINT BOULEVARD THEY HAVE A CONTINUANCE TO NEXT
THANK YOU. >> IF WE COULD RECALL THE FIRST CASE, THE MASSIE ON BELL AVENUE? 17898? I DON'T THINK WE MADE THEIR PACKET PART OF THE RECORD SO IF WE CAN MAKE THAT RESPONDENT EXHIBIT ONE SO THAT WAY WE HAVE
>> 17-898, 1450 BELL AVENUE, AGENDA ITEM 6A.
>> WHAT DO WE IMMEDIATE TO ADD? >> THE PACKET THEY PROVIDED FOR
EVERYONE. >> THAT WILL BE ADMITTED AS
>> THEN WE ARE ADJOURNED. HOW WERE THEY NOTIFIED?
>> NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE VIOLATOR CERTIFIED MAIL AND GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED AND A NOTICE IS MAILED TO THE VIOLATOR AND A NOTICE OF HEARIN AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ATTACHED TO IT AND A COPY WAS PLACED IN THE FILE TEN DAYS OF THE HEARING AND IT'S POSTED ON THE LOBBY OF CITY HALL AND AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH THE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.
IF THE CERTIFICATION CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS POSTING IS COMPLETED THE SAME WAY AS IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED.
>> THERE BEING NOTHING FURTHER, WE'RE ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.