[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:05]
>> GOOD MORNING. I'M THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE AND WILL BE PRESIDING OVER THIS MORNING'S HEARINGS.
YOU ARE HERE BECAUSE YOU RECEIVED NOTICE THAT YOUR PROPERTY WAS POSSIBLY IN VIOLATION OF A PARTICULAR CITY CODE OR ORDINANCE, AND YOU WERE GIVEN A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME TO CORRECT THAT. THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE NOT DONE THAT AND YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, WE WILL CALL YOUR CASES SHORTLY.
ALSO, YOU MAY HAVE RECEIVED A TRAFFIC CITATION.
I DON'T THINK I SEE ANY ON HE HERE... YOU MAY HAVE RECEIVED A
CITATION. >> YOU WANT TO BE HEARD, YOU TOO WILL BE HEARD. I LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT SHOULD YOU BE FOUND GUILTY OF THAT OFFENSE, YOU COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS AS WELL.
NOW, DOES ANYBODY HERE NEED AN INTERPRETER? OKAY. SECOND THING.
YOU ARE BEING RECORDED ON LIVE ST. LUCIE TV, CITY OF FORT PIERCE. IF SOMEBODY SAYS THEY SAW YOU ON TV, THEY POSSIBLY SAW YOU ON THE LOCAL CITY OF FORCE PIERCE TV STATION. NOW, IF YOU DON'T MIND, PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
>> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
>> PLEASE REMAIN STANDING. >> GO AHEAD.
>> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH?
>> AND LAST QUESTION. AND LAST THOUGHT.
DOES ANYBODY NEED AN INTERPRETER?
SO NOBODY NEEDS ONE. >> I HAVE ONE PERSON THAT IS GOING TO BE USING AN INTERPRETR TODAY.
MAD CAM CLERK, CALL THE FIRST CASE.
IF YOU HAVE PHONES, PLEASE TURN THEM OFF.
[B. IDENTIFICATION OF CASES IN COMPLIANCE OR RESCHEDULED]
WE ARE GOING TO BE STARTING WITH THE IDENTIFICATION OF CASESSS IN COMPLIANCE RESCHEDULED. 221094.
DYLAN LAIRD. 222814 GULFSTREAM BEACH ACCESS ROADS. 222853, JETTY PARK, RULE.
222885, SOFT CAUSEWAY PARK, WEBB.
BOATRIGHT. SOUTH 7TH STREET, GAMEZ.
22-3028. 200 BLOCK ORANGE AVENUE.
THE CAKE LADY. 22-027, 300 BLOCK NORTH 13TH STREET, FISHER. 22-3103,LED A ALDRICH.
600 BLOCK PARKWAY DRIVE. 22-3215, ROWLAND.
WATERMAN. 22-3204, PV HOLDING CORP.
22-1192, 200 BLOCK AVENUE A NORTH SIDE, PICKLED.
22-3314, 201 NORTH SECOND STREET, PICKLED.
22- 2984, 100 BLOCK NORTH 18TH STREET, LUBRANO.
RUGGIERO. SOFT CAUSEWAY PARK, ROMERO.
22-2840, SOFT CAUSEWAY PARK, HOOVER.
22-2821, 100 BLOCK NORTH SECOND STREET, HAISLEY-BOLONKA.
22-3096, THE 200 BLOCK NORTH SECOND STREET, BARKER.
22-3026, 200 BLOCK NORTH NINTH STREET, BONDICK.
22-3012, 200 BLOCK NORTH NINTH STREET, MEAD.
22-3030, 100 BLOCK ORANGE AVENUE, ACOSTA.
22-3038, ATLANTIC AVENUE, TOBIAS.
SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK, WILMOT. 22-2962, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK, AND BB TRANSLLC. 22-2653 SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK,
[00:05:10]
PORTELA. 22-3224.1700 BLOCK BINNEY DRIVE, EDMONDS.
22-3156, 100 BLOCK NORTH SECOND STREET, NASH.
100 BLOCK SOUTH 7TH STREET, AGUILAR.
AND 22-1445603, SOUTH 15TH COURT, ALEX SHLENSKI.
[CC. 22-3040 CE 2406 S. 10th Street CKD Holding LLC Balac Transport INC Michael Rabenecker]
ALL RIGHT. OUR FIRST CASE TODAY IS GOING TO BE 22-3040, 2406 SOUTH TENTH STREET.CKD HOLDING LLC AND BALAC TRANSPORT INC.
>> GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. >> GOOD MORNING.
>> MY NAME IS MICHAEL RABENECKER.
I'M AN EMPLOYEE AT THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE AS A PARKING ENFORCEMENT SPECIALIST. A CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
>> BEFORE YOU THIS MORNING IS CASE NUMBER 22-3040.
IT IS A CODE ENFORCEMENT CITATION WRITTEN AT THE LOCATION OF 2406 SOUTH TENTH STREET. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 16, 2022. THE VIOLATORS IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A CKD HOLDING LLC, AND A BALAC TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED.
THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 1182, A CODE ENFORCEMENT CITATION, A VIOLATION OF CITY CODE 125-315 SUB-SECTION 2, SUB-SECTION B. COMMERCIAL VEHICLES CANNOT BE PARKED IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA EXCEEDING ONE HOUR IN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $250 FINE BE ASSESSED AND AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 FOR A TOTAL OF $260. THE CITY RECOMMENDS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATOR... VIOLATION EXISTS, FAILURE TO PAY THE FINE WILL RESULT IN THIS BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
I HAVE PHOTOS AS EVIDENCE. THEY ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED.
THEYK A ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE VIOLATIONS I WITNESSED.
AT 9:27, I WENT TO THAT LOCATION, NOTICE THE VEHICLE PARKED IN THAT LOCATION. AND I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION WARNING. THE VIOLATION WARNING WAS PLACED ON THE VEHICLE. PHOTOS WERE TAKEN.
I RETURNED AT 11:26 ON THE SAME DATE.
THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN MOVED. AND SO A CITATION WAS WRITTEN.
SO YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU HERE ALL THE PHOTOS RELATED TO THE CASE.
DO YOU NEED TO SEE THE PHOTOS, SIR IN.
>> NO. >> THE PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE ADMITTED. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO, YOUR HONOR. >> GIVE ME A MINUTE.
WOULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME, PLEASE?
>> WESLEY. >> WESLEY, WHAT IS YOUR LAST
>> ARE YOU THE OWNER OF THE TRUCK?
>> TIME DRIVER OF THE TRUCK. I WORK FOR THE COMPANY NAME THAT IS ON THERE. I USED TO WORK FOR THEM.
>> OKAY. HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE
YOUR HONOR, I HAVE BEEN IN TRUCKING FOR ONLY THREE YEARS, AND SINCE 2019, THAT IS WHERE I HAVE BEEN PARKING.
I HAVE NEVER RECEIVED A WARNING SAYING THAT I CANNOT PARK THERE.
AND I WENT TO CHURCH. I LEFT MY HOUSE AROUND 10:30 IN THE MORNING. I WENT TO CHURCH.
AND I CAME BACK AROUND 12:45. I DIDN'T SEE THAT ON THE WARNING TICKET ON THE TRUCK UNTIL, LIKE, AROUND 2:30.
I WENT TO THE TRUCK TO GET SOMETHING.
AND THEN I SAW THE WARNING TICKET ON THE DOOR.
I DIDN'T EVEN PAY ATTENTION TO THE CITATION.
I SAW THE WARNING. IMMEDIATELY WHEN I SAW THAT, I HURRY UP AND TOOK THE TRUCK AND TOOK IT TO THE TRUCK STOP.
[00:10:03]
AND I HAVE NEVER... IF I KNEW THAT, I WAS NOT GOING TO PARK THE TRUCK THERE. IT HAS BEEN THREE YEARS.I HAVE BEEN PARKING THERE. I RECEIVED A SIGH... A WARNING PLUS A CITATION ON THE SAME DAY ON A SUNDAY WHEN I WENT TO CHURCH AND CAME BACK. I SAW.
THAT I CAME BACK TO PLEAD TO SEE IF YOU CAN HEAR ME.
I DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT IT. IF I KNEW THAT I WAS NOT ABLE TO PARK THERE, FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS, I WAS NEVER GOING TO PARK
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
>> DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COUNSELOR?
DID YOU TAKE A COURSE TO GET YOUR TRUCKING LICENSE?
>> YES, I DID. >> AND IN THAT COURSE, DID THEY TELL YOU THAT YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PARK IN CERTAIN
RESIDENTIAL AREAS? >> NOT THAT I REMEMBER.
>> ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO, YOUR HONOR. >> ALL RIGHT.
I'M GOING TO FIND THAT YOU ARE IN VIOLATION, AND I'LL FINE YOU $250, PLUS A $10ADMIN FEE FOR $260.
YOU HAVE 14 DAYS TO PAY. IF NOT, THIS MATTER CAN BE TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE YOU COULD
INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS. >> SO YOUR HONOR, THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO FOR ME TO AT LEAST TAKE SOME OF IT SINCE I DIDN'T KNOW AND IT WAS ON A SUNDAY? I WENT TO CHURCH, CAME BACK AND SAW THAT.
SOMETHING THAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE IF IT WAS THROUGHOUT THE WEEK, OKAY. ON A SUNDAY?
>> LISTEN, THERE IS AN OLD EXPRESSION THAT SAYS "IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE." PAUSE YOU DIDN'T KNOW IT IS NOT ENOUGH... BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T KNOW IT IS NOT ENOUGH CAUSE FOR ME TO REDUCE THIS FINE. THIS MAY NOT BE ANY CONSIDERATION FOR YOU, BUT I HAVE GOTTEN TWO CITATIONS MYSELF. YOU CAN'T PARK LONGER THAN TWO HOURS DOWNTOWN. AND I HAVE GONE TO COURT ON OTHER MATTERS AND EXCEEDED MY LIMIT, AND I HAVE GOTTEN TWO CITATIONS THAT I PAID. EVERYBODY IS TREATED THE SAME HERE. GOOD LUCK.
>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
>> YOU ARE WELCOME. NEXT CASE?
[A. 22-1568 CE 702 N 19th St Ferrara Family Limited Partner Charmaine Kirkland]
WE ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GO INTO 22-1568702, NORTH 19TH STREET. FERRARA FAMILY LIMITED PARTNER.I BELIEVE MR. BERTRAM CAN COME UP FOR THIS ONE.
I'M GOING TO CALL THE VIOLATOR ON THE PHONE.
THAT IS... >> THIS IS THE LOT CLEARING.
WE ARE GOING TO CALL FOR THIS ONE.
SO LET ME SEE IF HE ANSWERS. >> OKAY.
THEN HOLD ON. YOU ARE GOING TO CALL FROM T
>> ANDREW, WE ARE GOING TO BE CALLING YOU IN A SECOND, OKAY? OKAY. HE IS EXPECTING YOUR CALL.
>> OKAY. WITH THIS ONE WE ACTUALLY HAVE
TWO PHONE CALLS IN. >> OH, OKAY.
>> ARE WE GOING TO BE ABLE TO CONFERENCE THEM?
GO AHEAD AND GIVE IT A TRY. >> YES.
GIVE IT A TRY. WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO.
>> IT IS. >> THIS IS CATHERINE CALLING YOU LIVE IN THE COMMISSIONER CHAMBERS.
[00:15:01]
WE ARE ABOUT TO CALL YOUR CASE. >> ALL RIGHT.
>> LET ME SEE IF I CAN GET ONE MORE PARTY ON THIS PHONE CALL.
>> I HAVE MY PHONE MEETING NOW, SO...
>> CAN YOU CALL HIM ON YOUR CELL PHONE?
>> WE ARE NOT ABLE TO. >> WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO GET?
>> WE ARE JUST GETTING ONE MORE PARTY TO THIS CASE.
ONE MOMENT, SIR. >> WHICH PARTY IS THAT?
>> WE ARE GETTING ONE OF THE CITY'S WITNESSES ON THE PHONE,
SIR. >> I'M GOING TO PUT YOU ON SPEAKER, OKAY? ALL RIGHT.
>> I'M GOING TO TAKE HIM TO YOU. THANK YOU.
JUST MAKE SURE THAT YOU PUT THE PHONE CLOSE ENOUGH TO THE MIC SO
>> ALL RIGHT. THE CITY CAN START PRESENTING
THE CASE. >> DO YOU WANT ME TO TALK?
WHAT SHOULD I DO? >> THIS IS GOING TO BE CHAR CHARMAINE. SHE WILL START TALKING.
THE CODE OFFICER. READY, CHARMAINE?
GO AHEAD. >> GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR.
CASE NUMBER 22-1568, ADDRESS 702 NORTH 19TH STREET.
OWNER IS FERRARA FAMILY LIMITED PARTNER.
THIS CASE WAS INITIATED ON MAY 12, 2022 FOR SECTION 2419, MAINTENANCE OF NUISANCE ON PROPERTY PROHIBITED AND SECTION 24-21, NUISANCE AS A CONDITION. ON MAY 18, 2022, MYSELF, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, CHARMAINE KIRKLAND CITED THE PROPERTY AS A NUISANCE FOR LOT-CLEARING VIOLATIONS.
ON MAY 18, 2022, PROPERTY POSTED AND DECLARED AS A NUISANCE, SEPTEMBER 12, 2022, THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE COMPLETED THE WORK ON NOVEMBER 21, 2022, A REQUEST WAS PUT IN FOR AN INVOICE FOR FINANCE. AN APPEAL WAS REQUESTED BY THE
OWNER. >> DO YOU HAVE THE INVOICE
FOR... >> I'M DOWNLOADING IT RIGHT NOW.
JUST GIVE ME A SECOND. >> OKAY.
BEFORE WE SHOW THEM, WE NEED TO MOVE THEM INTO EVIDENCE.
SO, YOU CAN TAKE IT DOWN. DO YOU HAVE THE INVOICE? OKAY. IS THAT THE INVOICE YOU HAVE HANDED ME? OKAY.
THIS INOICE SHOWS THAT IT WAS $2,000 PLUS AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE OF $1,000 IS. THAT CORRECT?
>> CAN I HAVE THE EXHIBIT TABS? >> SIR, PLEASE DON'T INTERRUPT.
YOU WILL HAVE TIME TO SPEAK. OKAY?
[00:20:01]
>> YES. >> I DON'T HAVE THE TABS.
>> MS. KIRKLAND, DO YOU ALSO HAVE... THERE SHOULD BE A SHEET IN THERE THAT SHOWS WHAT THE VENDOR ULTIMATELY PAID OUT.
IT IS ON YOUR LEFT IN YOUR FILE, IT APPEARS.
>> THIS IS MR. FERRARA'S... >> CORRECT.
WHAT HE GAVE YOU FOR WHAT HE PAID?
>> YES. >> WHAT WE PAID TO HIM.
WHAT HE PAID TO CUT HIS OWN LOT. >> THAT IS MR. FERRARA'S.
OKAY. WHERE IS THE SHEET THAT IS FROM
FROM... THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT. >> OKAY.
SO IS THIS THE LIST WORKSHEET? >> YES, IT IS.
>> OKAY. THERE IS ONE SUMMARY THAT EXISTS WHICH IS WHAT I'M ASKING FOR. BECAUSE ULTIMATELY, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THE $300 WAS NOT PAID BECAUSE THE GRASS WAS ALREADY CUT. IT WAS ONLY... DO YOU KNOW WHERE THAT LIST IS? IF I CAN HAVE ONE SECOND, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, TO FILL THIS OUT.
>> YOU MAY. >> THAT ONE? LET'S SEE. NO.
OKAY. SO WHAT I HAVE MARKED, MS. KIRKLAND, EXHIBIT 1 IS THE REQUEST FOR INVOICE MEMO.
IS THAT CORRECT? >> YES, IT IS.
>> THEN EXHIBIT 2 IS YOUR... IS THE INVOICE THAT WAS ORIGINALLY SENT. WAS THAT CORRECT?
>> YES. >> THE TOTAL ON THOSE TWO IS $2,100. IS THAT CORRECT?
>> YES. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE THOSE IN AS EXHIBITS 1 AND 2.
>> MR. FERRARA, YOU HAVE HEARD THAT TESTIMONY.
HAVE YOU SEEN THESE DOCUMENTS? >> I BELIEVE SO.
SHE MENTIONED THERE WAS A $1,000 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE INITIALLY.
THAT IS WHAT I INTERRUPTED. IT IS $100 ADMINISTRATION FEE.
>> I MAY HAVE MISSPOKEN. IT SAYS $100 ON THERE.
>> YES, MA'AM. >> THESE WILL BE ADMITTED AS EXHIBIT 1. COMPOSITE?
>> I MARKED THEM AS 1 AND 2, MA'AM.
>> DO YOU HAVE COPIES OF THE POSTING FOR THE PROPERTY?
OKAY. >> ARE YOU SPEAKING TO ME?
>> NO, SIR. I WAS STILL SPEAKING WITH
MS. KIRKLAND. >> I HAVE A COPY OF MY POSTING AS WELL AS THE CASE WAS TRANSFERRED TO A CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER LARRY STEVENS.
BOTH OF THE POSTINGS ARE HERE. >> I'M GOING BY WHAT YOU HAVE ON
[00:25:03]
YOUR THING. THAT YOU HAVE PUT ON THIS.>> THIS IS THE AFFIDAVIT... >> DO YOU HAVE PHOTOS OF THE ACTUAL POSTING IS WHAT I WAS ASKING FOR?
SO THIS WILL BE CITY'S EXHIBIT 3, BUT DOES THIS SHOW THE NOTICE THAT WAS LEFT ON THE PROPERTY ON THE TOP PHOTOGRAPH?
>> THE CITY WILL MOVE THIS IN AS EXHIBIT 3.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. THANK YOU.
>> OKAY. DO YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE BEFORE AND AFTER OF THE PROPERTY?
>> SUPPOSED TO BE ONLY TWO. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, WE ARE GOING TO NEED A MINUTE. WE ARE GOING TO NEED TO PASS.
THIS. >> YOU WANT TO GO OFF THE RECORD? LET'S GO OFF THE RECORD, MADAM
CLERK. >> SIR, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
[00:31:28]
WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO IS FIND THE HARD COPIES OF THE
PHOTOGRAPHS RELATED TO THIS. >> I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANY PHOTOGRAPHS FROM 5-12. YOU HAVEN'T SENT ME ANY
SO WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO, IF IT IS OKAY WITH THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, WE ARE GOING TO COMPLETELY PASS THIS CASE WHILE WE FIND THESE PHOTOGRAPHS AND GET THEM E-MAILED TO HIM.
IF HE HAS NOT SEEN THEM. >> WELL, I CAN'T MAKE A FEW
STATEMENTS ABOUT A FEW THINGS? >> WELL, WE ARE NOT DONE PRESENTING OUR CASE YET. IT WOULD BE FUTILE FOR YOU TO DO SO AT THIS POINT. MY QUESTION FOR YOU, SIR, IS DO
YOU WANT TO... >> SO I WASTED MY TIME.
>> YES. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO HOLD ON THE LINE WHILE WE PASS YOUR CASE FOR A FEW MINUTES OR WOULD YOU LIKE US TO CALL YOU BACK? IT WILL BE TODAY.
I JUST WANT TO KNOW IF YOU WANT TO STAY ON THE PHONE.
>> WELL, HOW LONG WILL IT BE? I WORK IN A HOSPITAL AND I SEE PATIENTS. HOW LONG IS THIS GOING TO TAKE?
>> 10, MAYBE 15 MINUTES. WE ARE GOING TO CALL ANOTHER CASE WHILE WE FIND THOSE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> ALL RIGHT. YOU CAN CALL... I'M INTERESTED IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS WHICH I HAVE NOT SEEN FROM 5-12.
>> IT IS NOT 5-12. IT IS 9-12.
>> WELL, I HAVE SEEN THE 9-12 PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> THOSE ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHS. THOSE ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR. THE HARD COPIES OF THOSE.
>> WELL, HOLD ON NOW. I GOT A NOTICE ON 5-12 THAT I
GOT NOTHING SINCE 5-12. >> OKAY.
SIR, MY QUESTION IS DO YOU WANT TO HOLD ON THE PHONE OR WOULD
YOU LIKE US TO CALL YOU BACK? >> YOU CAN CALL ME BACK.
>> IEST. YES, SIR. >> THANK YOU.
SHOULD I HANG UP? >> MS. KIRKLAND, WE ARE GOING TO
CALL A DIFFERENT CASE. >> I'M GOING TO CALL YOU RIGHT
BACK, MR. FERRARA. >> TELL ANDREW, TOO, THAT THEY
ARE BOTH COMING BACK. >> ANDREW, I'M GOING TO CALL YOU
>> OKAY. WE WILL GO WITH THE NEXT ONE.
SHE IS GOING TO BE MY INTERPRETER.
>> 22-3450. 2401 AVENUE P, JIMMY NETTLES TREE AND LAND CLEARING SERVICES, INC.
WE DO HAVE AN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE FOR THIS ONE.
[00:35:08]
>> HELLO? >> COUNSELOR, YOU HAVE A COUPLE
OF PAPER CLIPS? >> YES, MA'AM.
>> YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND GIVE US ANOTHER ONE.
>> CALL THE NUMBER NOW? >> WELCOME.
FOR INTERPRETATION SERVICES, PLEASE CONTINUE...
[00:40:07]
>> ARE WE OFF THE RECORD? ARE WE OFF THE RECORD ON THIS?
WHILE YOU... >> WE ARE JUST HAVING A COUPLE OF DIFFICULTIES WITH THE AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE
INTERPRETATION. >> DO YOU WANT TO GO OFF THE
>> ALL RIGHT. WE WILL GO OFF THE RECORD UNTIL YOU CAN REACH
[A. 22-3450 CE 2401 Avenue P Jimmie Nettles Tree & Land Clearing Services Inc Isaac Saucedo]
>> ARE WE ON THE RECORD, CAT? >> I JUST UNMITED.
>> LET'S CALL THE CASE AND DO IT FORMALLY ON THE RECORD.
>> 223450-JIMMY NETTLES TREE AND LAND-CLEARING SERVICES, INC.
WE WILL BE CONTINUING THIS CASE, AND SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ROSS HAS
RECUSED HERSELF. >> YOU ALL WILL GET A NOTICE IN
THE MAIL FOR THE NEW DATE. >> SO MR. NETTLES, I THINK HE IS GOING TO BE ASKING TO APPEAR VIA TELEPHONE.
>> OKAY. >> THAT IS WHY I WANTED IT TO BE CLEAR THAT, YOU KNOW, IN ALL FAIRNESS TO EVERYBODY, I MEAN, YOU DID AN EXCELLENT JOB AT MY HOUSE.
SORRY TO KEEP YOU HERE SO LONG. >> I'M GOING TO JUMP INTO THE CITATIONS. SO WE CAN...
[J. 22-3223PK Jaycee Park Kyle Rich Johnson Michael Rabenecker]
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-3223 JAYCEE PARK, KYLE RICH JOHNSON.
>> I'M SORRY. WHERE ARE WE AT?
>> WE JUMPED INTO CITATIONS. THAT IS GOING TO BE 4G.
>> OKAY. >> YOU ARE GOING TO DO IT?
SORRY ABOUT THAT, YOUR HONOR. YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-3223, A PARKING CITATION WRITTEN AT JAYCEE PARK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON NOVEMBER 13, 2022. THAT IS CITATION CASE.
THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A KYLE RICH JOHNSON.
THE CITATION NUMBER IS 18531, A PARKING CITATION, A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35, RESTRICTED PARKING FOR CARS ONLY. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED AND AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR WILL BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE INDICATED ABOVE. SO I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE AS EVIDENCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED.
AND THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT.
AND DO YOU NEED TO SEE THE PHOTOS?
>> NO. >> THE CITY WILL MOVE THOSE IN
AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO, YOUR HONOR. >> AND SIR, YOUR NAME?
>> KYLE RICH JOHNSON. >> YOU HAVE SEEN THE
>> HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE ALLEGATION?
>> WHEN I HAD PARKED MY CAR, MY R.V., IT WAS THE DAY AFTER
[00:45:02]
HURRICANE ANNE. THERE WAS TWO POLICE OFFICERS PATROLLING THE BOAT RAMP, AND I HAD ASKED THEM IS IT OKAY.THERE WAS NO ONE IN THE PARKING LOT.
IS IT OKAY IF I LEAVE MY R.V. HERE FOR A COUPLE HOURS.
THEY SAID IT WAS OKAY. AN HOUR LATER, I CAME BACK AND I HAD A CITATION. AND A COUPLE DAYS LATER, I TRIED TO PAY THE CITATION OFF, THEY SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE IT IN THEIR COMPUTERS. SO I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT TO DO
>> I'M SORRY. CAN I CLARIFY WHICH HURRICANE
DID YOU SAY? >> SAY THAT AGAIN IN.
>> WHICH HURRICANE DID YOU SAY IN.
>> HURRICANE ANNE. THE LAST HURRICANE THAT HIT US.
>> I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS. >> I HAVE NO PROBLEM PAYING THE FINE. IT IS JUST THAT THE POLICE OFFICERS TOLD ME IT WAS OKAY TO PARK THERE.
YOU KNOW. I DOUBLE-CHECKED AND MADE SURE TOFS DAY WITH THEM. YOU KNOW?
>> I TAKE IT YOU DIDN'T GET THEIR NAMES OR...
>> NO. IT WAS AN OLDER OFFICER AND THEN BUT THEY WERE PATROLLING THE BOAT RAMP TO MAKE SURE THAT NO BOATS WERE GOING OUT BECAUSE THE DOCK WAS GOING UNDERWATER.
>> AND IN THE ONE PHOTO... >> I MEAN, YOU CAN SEE THE
BARRICADES. >> THAT PHOTO, YOU CAN SEE THE BARRICADES IN THE BACK WHERE THEY DID...
>> THERE WAS A POLICE OFFICER, YOU KNOW, PARKED RIGHT THERE TO MAKE SURE... BUT HE IS NOT IN THE PICTURE.
AND THERE IS ON THE OTHER PICTURE, THERE IS ANOTHER POLICE CAR RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME. I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS A BIG DEAL PARKING THERE IN THE SHADE, CONSIDERING NO ONE...
>> OH, YEAH. THAT POLICE CAR PARKED IN FRONT OF YOU IS LIKE A DUMMY POLICE CAR.
THERE WOULD BE NOBODY IN THERE. >> ALL RIGHT.
WELL, THERE WAS TWO WHEN I WAS THERE.
LIKE I SAID, I HAVE NO PROBLEM PAYING THE TICKET.
WHEN I WENT IN, THERE WAS... THEY DIDN'T HAVE IT IN THE
COMPUTER. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO, MA'AM. >> ANYTHING FROM...
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, HURRICANE IAN WAS IN SEPTEMBER.
THIS IS FROM NOVEMBER. >> OKAY.
>> WASN'T THERE A HURRICANE AFTER IAN?
DID WE HAVE ONE AFTER IAN? >> THE ONE THAT ALMOST FLOODED
>> WAS IT NICOLE? I DON'T REMEMBER.
>> MAYBE. >> HURRICANE NICOLE WAS
NOVEMBER. >> THE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED
NOVEMBER 13. >> AND HURRICANE NICOLE WAS THE THE 7TH THROUGH THE 12TH OF NOVEMBER.
>> HE WOULD HAVE BEEN THERE THE DAY... THE DAY AFTER THE STORM.
I TRAVELED AROUND WITH A FRIEND TO CHECK OUT THE ISLAND, MAKE SURE EVERYTHING WAS OKAY. I CAME BACK AN HOUR LATER TO A
>> ANYTHING FROM THE CITY ON THIS?
>> NO, MA'AM. WE HAVE DISCUSSED THIS BEFORE.
YOU HAVE THE DISCRETION UNDER THE CODE UP TO $500 FOR THE FINE. IF YOU FEEL... YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADJUST THE FINE, YOU CAN DO SO. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADJUST THE LATE FEE, YOU CAN DO SO. WE WOULD ASK THE ADMIN REMAIN THE SAME. THAT IS A COST TO US FOR
MR. RABENECKER? ANYTHING FROM YOU?
>> NO, YOUR HONOR. >> MAY I ADD SOMETHING?
>> YES, YOU MAY. >> IF THE POLICE OFFICER SAID IT WASN'T OKAY TO PARK THERE, I WOULDN'T HAVE PARKED THERE.
I WOULD HAVE PARKED LIKE A NORMAL PERSON.
INSTEAD OF IN THE SHADE. >> WAS THERE SOMEONE ELSE THERE
WITH YOU THAT DAY? >> MY GIRLFRIEND.
SHE PICKED ME UP IN HER CAR SO WE COULD DRIVE AROUND ON THE
>> ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A FIRST FOR ME.
[00:50:01]
OKAY? UNDER OATH, YOU SAID THERE WERE TWO POLICE OFFICERS THERE. YOU TALKED TO THEM.I'LL JUST CHARGE YOU AN ADMIN FEE OF $10.
>> AND HOW SOON CAN YOU PAY THAT?
>> RIGHT NOW. >> DO WE HAVE SOMEBODY WHO CAN GO WITH HIM UPSTAIRS? I'LL DISMISS THE CITATION.
>> JANIE RIGHT HERE CAN EXPLAIN TO YOU WHERE TO GO.
>> YOU TOO, THANKS. >> I'M SORRY.
JUST SO WE CAN DO THE ORDER CORRECTLY.
YOU ARE FIN FIND HIM IN VIOLATI, WAIVING ALL FINES.
>> WE ARE STILL DOING 14 DAYS. >> YOU ARE DISMISSING THE
>> WE DISMISS THE CITATION, YOU WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CHARGE THE
NO FINE. JUST THE ADMIN FEE OF $10.
>> I GOT IT. >> 14 DAYS TO PAY.
HE IS GOING TO PAY IT TODAY. GOOD LUCK TO YOU, SIR.
>> THANK YOU. >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> THANK YOU.
[T. 22-2859PK South Causeway Park Brittany Margaret Stoddard Michael Rabenecker]
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2859, CAUSEWAY PARK, BRITTANY MARGARET
STODDARD. >> JUST FOLLOW ONE OF THEM.
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WHERE ARE WE GOING AGAIN? I'M SORRY. WHAT IS THE CASE NUMBER AGAIN?
>> I MISSED IT. >> CASE NUMBER WAS 4-T.
THAT IS THE ONE. >> THAT IS WHAT I WAS LOOKING
YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-2859, A PARKING CITATION THAT WAS WRITTEN AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 14, 2022.
THIS IS A CITATION CASE. THE VIOLATOR CAME BACK AS A BRITTANY MARGARET STODDARD. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18404, A PARKING CITATION OF CITY ORDINANCE CODE 34-35S.
PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED AND A AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND A LATE FEE OF $18.
IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR WILL BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE, AS INDICATED ABOVE.
SO I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE AS EVIDENCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED. THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE
VIOLATIONS I WITNESSEDMENT. >> YOU HAVE SEEN THESE PHOTOS?
>> YES, MA'AM. >> WE WILL MOVE THIS AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, YOUR HONOR.
>> AND MS. STODDARD, HOW DO YOU RESPOND IN.
>> WELL, I'M PARKED IN BETWEEN TWO LINES, SO I'M NOT QUITE SURE WHAT THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY IS WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY NOT AN EXCUSE FOR IGNORANCE. HOWEVER, THERE WASN'T ANY SIGN.
MY CAR IS THE BLACK MITSUBISHI RIGHT THERE.
AND THERE WASN'T ANY SIGNS PRESENT TO SAY THAT I COULDN'T PARK THERE. AND THERE IS A LINE ON EACH SIDE OF WHERE I'M PARKED. ONE, LET'S SAY WE ARE LOOKING AT IT. I'M NOT SURE WHICH SIDE YOU WANT TO GO BY. ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PICTURE, IT IS... I DON'T KNOW. A DARK YELLOW LINE.
THERE IS ALSO A FAINT YELLOW LINE TO THE RIGHT WITH ANOTHER CAR THERE. AND AS I SAID, THERE WAS NO SIGN. AND IT WAS THE WEEK BEFORE SCHOOL STARTED. I HAVE THREE KIDS.
TWO OF WHICH ARE 12. ONE IS EIGHT.
ALL THE MONEY I SPENT ON SCHOOL, THE LAST THING I WAS GOING TO BE DOING IS DISREGARDING LAWS TO, YOU KNOW, PUT MYSELF IN A POSITION TO PAY A TICKET. I HAD NO IDEA.
I SAW THE LINES THERE. THAT IS WHY I PARKED THERE.
I APOLOGIZE. I DID NOT RECEIVE A WARNING.
I HAVE NEVER RECEIVED EVEN A PARKING WARNING BECAUSE I JUST WOULDN'T PUT MYSELF IN THAT POSITION INTENTIONALLY.
I DN'T GO TO THE CAUSEWAY. I WOULDN'T KNOW.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
>> WE FREQUENTLY GET PEOPLE THAT PARK IN THIS PARTICULAR SPOT, AND WE ARE FOREVER... THE CITY IS FOREVER ISSUING CITATIONS.
[00:55:04]
THERE SHOULD BE TWO YELLOW LINES.>> THERE IS A YELLOW LINE RIGHT THERE.
>> I SEE ONE. I DON'T SEE ONE ON THE DRIVER'S
SIDE. >> IF YOU SEE IT, IT IS, LIKE,
SUPER FAINT. >> I JUST DON'T SEE IT.
>> IT WAS SOMETHING THAT I SAW WHEN I WAS THERE.
I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND THERE SHOULD BE TWO LINES.
BUT THERE IS A LINE RIGHT THERE. THAT IS, LIKE, IT WAS A FAINT LINE. IT IS A FAINT LINE.
TO ME. OBVIOUSLY, THERE IS ANOTHER CAR THAT FELT THE SAME WAY. YOU KNOW, THEY WERE PARKED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT. WHATEVER IT IS.
I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND IT IS NOT THE SAME COLOR.
YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? RIGHT THERE IS WHERE I SAW THE LINE. AND I DIDN'T SEE ANY NO-PARKING SIGNS. I DON'T PLAN TO GO THERE
ANYMORE. >> MR. RABENECKER, WHERE ARE THOSE SIGNS THAT TELL THEM WHERE TO PARK?
>> RIGHT WHERE THAT WHITE CAR IS, THERE IS A SIGN THERE THAT SAYS, "PARK IN DESIGNATED SPOTS ONLY." IT IS KIND OF... WHERE SHE IS PARKED IS RIGHT AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE PARK. AND THERE IS NO YELLOW LINE ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE OF THE VEHICLE.
YEAH. WHERE THE HAND IS, THE SIGN SAYS "PARK IN DESIGNATED SPOTS ONLY" AS YOU ENTER THE PARK.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, YOUR HONOR.
>> I DID NOT KNOW THAT WAS NOT... I MEAN, I HEARD YOU SAY CLEARLY IGNORANCE IS NOT AN EXCUSE.
I DIDN'T KNOW THAT WASN'T A DESIGNATED SPOT.
AS I SAID BEFORE, I WOULD NOT HAVE PUT MYSELF IN A POSITION TO GET A TICKET AFTER ALL THE MONEY I HAVE SPENT.
I MEAN, LITERALLY, THAT WAS DAY BEFORE THEY WENT BACK TO SCHOOL.
MY POCKETS WERE HIT. I NEVER WOULD HAVE SAID, YEAH, I CAN AFFORD THIS TICKET. I'LL PARK WHEREVER I WANT.
>> LET ME ASK YOU THIS. YOU GOT THE TICKET BACK IN
>> THE DAY BEFORE SCHOOL STARTED?
ONE OF MY KIDS GOES TO PUBLIC SCHOOL.
ONE OF THEM STARTED THAT WEEK. ONE OF THEM STARTED THE FOLLOWING WEEK, I BELIEVE. I HAVE THREE.
TWO START ONE WEEK, AND THE OTHER ONE STARTS THE NEXT WEEK.
THE ONE STARTED THE WEEKEND AFTER... RIGHT BEFORE SCHOOL STARTED. FOR PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOL.
I DON'T REMEMBER WHICH ONE. YES.
>> YOU GOT THE TICKET BACK IN AUGUST.
WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG TO GET HERE?
>> AS THE GENTLEMAN SAID BEFORE, I TRIED TO FIND IT ON-LINE.
I LOOKED IT UP ON THE ST. LUCIE CLERK OF COURT.
I LOOKED MY NAME UP. I COULDN'T FIND IT.
AND THEN FROM THERE ON, I JUST OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND UNTIL THEY CAME BACK TO MY HOUSE. I MEAN, I'LL TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY. I SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN SO FORGETFUL. I SHOULD HAVE KEPT THAT IN MY PHONE. I SHOULD HAVE, LIKE, PINNED IT UP AND MADE SURE I HAD TO PAY IT AND DISPUTE IT.
THINGS OF THAT NATURE. HONESTLY, THAT WASN'T IN MY MIND. BECAUSE I JUST STARTED A NEW JOB TODAY. THE LAST... I'M, LIKE, MY MIND HAS BEEN BOGGLED WITH HOW I'M GOING TO PAY THIS BILL, THAT BILL. THE LAST THING I'M THINKING IS THIS CITATION. AFTER I LOOKED IT UP THAT ONE TIME. AND THEN I JUST DIDN'T EVEN THINK OF IT AGAIN. I MEAN, THAT IS NOT AN EXCUSE.
I WAS DISORGANIZED ON MY PART. I DID TRY TO LOOK MYSELF UP ON THE CLERKS. IT IS NOT THERE.
OBVIOUSLY, IT GOES INTO A DIFFERENT SYSTEM, I GUESS.
>> THIS IS THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE.
YEAH. I KNOW YOU DIDN'T KNOW IT.
I'M VERY IGNORANT. I DIDN'T KNOW.
I HAVE NEVER GOTTEN ANY SORT OF CITATION, FINE OR WARNING FROM THE CITY. I HAVE LIVED HERE FOR THREE
>> CONSECUTIVE YEARS. I HAVE LIVED IN THIS RESIDENCE FOR THREE YEARS. I HAVE NEVER, YOU KNOW, HAD ANY NEGATIVE INTERACTIONS WITH THE CITY, TO INCLUDE EVEN A WARNING.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
>> ALL RIGHT. THEN BASED ON THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED IN EVIDENCE, I FIND THAT YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PARKING VIOLATION, CITATION NUMBER 18404PK CODE SECTION 34-35S, PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
$50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND $18 LATE FEE.
TYPICALLY, WE GIVE 14 DAYS TO PAY THIS.
HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU NEED REALISTICALLY TO PAY $78?
[01:00:06]
AT LEAST THAT. BECAUSE I MEAN, I'M CRUNCHING NUMBERS AS IT IS. I DON'T KNOW.
14 DAYS, I'LL TRY. 30 DAYS, I CAN DEFINITELY MAKE
SURE THAT IT IS DONE. >> I'LL GIVE YOU 30.
>> OKAY. >> NOW, IF YOU DON'T PAY IT WITHIN THAT, IT COULD RESULT IN THIS BEING FORWARDED OVER TO THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT. YOU WILL INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES
AND COSTS OVER THERE. >> OKAY.
WITHIN THAT 30-DAY PERIOD. >> OKAY.
AND THEN DO I HAVE TO PAY CASH AT THE CITY HALL? IS THAT HOW IT GOES? BECAUSE I WAS TRYING TO PAY IT ON-LINE... I WAS GOING TO PAY IT ON-LINE AND BE DONE WITH IT.
BECAUSE I JUST STARTED A JOB ON MONDAY, AND THEN I HAD... THEY SAID I HAD TO GO TO THE CITY HALL.
I'M, LIKE, WELL, I HAVE TO WORK TODAY.
THEN I SPENT THE MONEY. >> CITY HALL IS HERE.
>> HOW DO I PAY IT, THOUGH? >> I CAN TELL YOU.
YOU WILL PAY TODAY? >> NO, NOT TODAY.
I HAVE TO PHYSICALLY GO HERE TO PAY IT?
>> I CAN SEND YOU A LINK TO PAY ON-LINE.
>> NO WORRIES. >> WE WILL NEED YOUR EMAIL
WHO WANTS TO TAKE IT? >> I'LL TAKE IT.
>> LAST NAME, FIRST NAME. >> THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
GOOD LUCK TO YOU. >> YOU, TOO.
MADAM CLERK? >> SHOULD WE CALL MR. FERRARA
WE TOLD HIM 15 MINUTES. >> OKAY.
>> WE WANT TO CALL ANDREW? >> YES.
THIS IS CATHERINE. WE ARE GOING TO CALL YOUR CASE
>> WE WILL LET THE CITY PRESENT THEIR CASE FIRST.
THEN YOU WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO SPEAK AFTERWARDS.
>> THANK YOU. >> AND COUNSELOR, WE WILL JUST, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO, YOU CAN JUST BEGIN WHERE WE LEFT OFF.
>> YES, SIR. SIR, THE YOU HEAR ME?
I APOLOGIZE FOR THE DELAY. WHAT WE WERE DOING WAS FINDING THE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT YOU RECEIVED.
I WANT TO CLARIFY, THIS IS ABOUT THE LOT-CLEARING FROM SEPTEMBER
>> YOU RECEIVED THOSE PHOTOGRAPHS.
THAT IS THE ONE THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.
I THINK THERE MAY BE ANOTHER ONE FROM BEFORE, BUT IT SHOULD BE
SEPTEMBER 12 OF 2022. >> YEAH.
NO. THAT IS PART OF MY CONTENTION.
I CAN WAIT UNTIL YOU ARE DONE. >> I BELIEVE YOU MAY HAVE READ MAY 12, 2022. THAT IS TYPO OFF OF OUR AGENDA.
IS THAT CORRECT? >> WELL, THE CASE INITIATING MAY
AND THE ACTUAL LOT-CLEARING ITSELF HAPPENED SEPTEMBER 12, 2022. IS THAT CORRECT?
SO THAT IS WHEN YOU OPENED IT, BUT THE CUTTING AND REMOVAL DIDN'T HAPPEN UNTIL SEPTEMBER. DO YOU NEED TO LOOK AT THIS?
>> I OPENED THE CASE ON MAY 12, 2022.
AND IT WAS PLACED ON BID. THE VENDOR... IT WAS PLACED ON BID... HOLD ON. THE VENDOR CUT IT ON SEPTEMBER
12. >> WAS A SECOND NOTICE SENT OUT?
A SECOND NOTICE THAT WENT OUT? >> I PLACED IT ON THE...
[01:05:18]
>> IT SAYS HERE YOU POSTED IT ON MAY 18? 2022? ON THE SHEET THAT I HAVE? THE SUMMARY SHEET. DOES THAT MATTER?
>> YES, IT MATTERS. >> SO MS. KIRKLAND, WHAT WE HAVE FOR THE DATES ON OUR SHEET IS MAY 12, 2022.
>> OKAY. AND THEN YOU POSTED THE PROPERTY AS A NUISANCE MAY 18, 2022. IS THAT RIGHT? THE VENDOR COMPLETED THE WORK ON SEPTEMBER 12 OF 2022.
AND THE VENDOR IN THE CASE WAS MOW FOR LESS LAWN CARE.
>> YES, IT IS. >> THE TOTAL BILLED FOR THAT IS $2,000 PLUS $100 ADMINISTRATION FEE.
A TOTAL OF $2,100. >> THAT IS CORRECT.
>> SO THE PHOTOGRAPHS WE HAVE IN EXHIBIT 5, MS. KIRKLAND, IS THE TOP PHOTO HERE BEFORE THE WORK AND THE BOTTOM PHOTO AFTER THE
>> DO THOSE FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE PROPERTY AS BEFORE AND AFTER AS YOU ARE ON SERVED IT?
>> YES. >> THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 5, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> CITY CLERK, I WOULD LIKE TO ADD, IF I MAY, THE CASE WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, SO THERE WAS A SECOND NOTICE SENT OUT. I HAVE PHOTOS FROM THAT OFFICER ON JULY 21, 2022 THAT WAS TAKEN ON THE PROPERTY.
AS WELL AS AUGUST 8, 2022. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, I APOLOGIZE. WE ARE LOOKING INTO THE SECOND POSTING. IF WE CULD HAVE A COUPLE OF
MR. FERRARA, ARE YOU UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE ARE DOING
I DON'T KNOW WHAT A POSTING IS. I GOT ONE NOTIFICATION IN MAY.
I THOUGHT I DEALT WITH IT. I HAVE NEVER HEARD ANYTHING SINCE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE POSTING
IS. >> SIR, THEY ARE LOOKING INTO A NOTICE THAT WAS SENT IN A POSTING FROM AUGUST.
I DID NOT RECEIVE THAT. I DID GET A POSTING IN AUGUST ABOUT A DIFFERENT LOT. 423, NORTH 19TH STREET.
[01:10:01]
THAT, I HAVE. I DID NOT GET ANOTHER POSTINGTHEY ARE TRYING TO CLARIFY THOSE TWO ISSUES.
IT MAY BE THAT THE AUGUST ONE IS RELATED TO A DIFFERENT PROPERTY.
IF YOU WILL GIVE US ONE SECOND. THEY ARE TRYING TO FIGURE THAT
OUT. >> YOU HAVE THE COPY OF IT.
I SENT IT TO YOU. >> DO WE WANT TO GO OFF THE
>> EVERYTHING HAS BEEN RECORDED AND RATHER THAN JUST HAVE A WHOLE PAUSE WITH NOTHING BUT JUST SILENCE, WE ARE GOING TO GO OFF THE RECORD FOR A MINUTE AND THEN AS SOON AS WE FIND THOSE
DOCUMENTS, WE WILL COME BACK. >> SURE.
I DID SEND THEM TO THEM. THEY HAVE THEM.
>> THEY ARE LOOKING FOR THEM NOW.
>> MR. FERRARA, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
>> I CAN. >> I HAVE SPOKE WITHIN STAFF, AND THEY HAVE REVIEWED THE FILE. AT THIS POINT, STAFF'S REQUEST IS TO DISMISS THIS CASE AT THIS POINT.
SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. >> I DON'T OWE ANYTHING IS?
>> IF SHE GRANTS OUR REQUEST, YOU WILL NOT.
>> ALL RIGHT. >> CORRECT, SIR.
WE ARE GOING TO MOVE TO... FOR A DISMISSAL.
>> ARE YOU GOING TO REFILE? >> NO.
>> ALL RIGHT, THEN. MR. FERRARA, BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY AND STAFF, WE ARE GOING TO DISMISS
THIS CASE. >> CAN I ADD ONE THING?
>> SURE. AS LONG AS YOU ARE NICE.
>> I'LL BE VERY NICE. YOU KNOW, I'M VERY COOPERATIVE.
IF I WOULD GET A PHONE CALL, AND I HAVE TRIED TO LEAVE MY PHONE NUMBER WITH THE OFFICE, WHENEVER THERE IS A PROBLEM, I'LL DEAL WITH IT INSTANTLY. I JUST NEED A PHONE CALL.
AND I WILL DEAL WITH IT. I'LL BE THE BEST CUSTOMER YOU GUYS EVER HAD. I HAVE NO INTEREST IN MAINTAINING BAD LOTS. I NEVER HAD THAT INTEREST.
BUT I NEED TO KNOW IF T THERE IA PROBLEM.
I HAVE A COMPANY IN FORT PIERCE THAT TAKES CARE OF MY LOTS.
IF THERE IS A PROBLEM, I WILL CALL THEM AND MAKE SURE IT IS GOOD. I NEVER GET A PHONE CALL.
IT WOULD MAKE IT SO MUCH EASIER. THAT IS MY COMMENT.
[01:15:01]
I'M SURE THE CITY WILL TAKE NOTE OF THAT.
>> WE WILL TAKE NOTE OF. THAT USUALLY, WE SEND NOTICES OF VIOLATION, MR. FERRARA. WE WILL TAKE A NOTE ON YOUR...
>> YOU KNOW, BUT THEN YOU HAVE TO WRITE OUT A BUNCH OF PAPERS.
I GOT TO GO TO THE POST OFFICE AND SIGN IT.
ONE PHONE CALL, AND IT IS FIXED. IF I TAKE PHONE CALL AND I DON'T FIX IT, THEN I'M NEGLIGENT. I RECOGNIZE THAT.
LY FIX ANY PROBLEM I HAVE. >> I UNDERSTAND.
THANK YOU. >> I APPRECIATE IT.
>> NEXT CASE. WHEN YOU ARE READY, MADAM CLERK.
>> OKAY. OUR NEXT CASE IS 20-19413101 TENNESSEE AVENUE, RANDY AND REBECCA STOTLER.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, THIS WAS HERE PREVIOUSLY.
WE CAN SCROLL DOWN. ON THE AGENDA, PLEASE.
THERE WAS A REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME THAT WAS FILED RECENTLY, RELATED TO THE FINES. I BELIEVE YOU HAD BEEN GIVEN SIX
MONTHS ORIGINALLY TO PAY IT. >> 12.
THERE WAS A REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION AGAIN, AND SPEAKING WITH STAFF, THERE IS NO OBJECTION TO AN EXTENSION FOR SIX MONTHS TO PAY THE FINES. THE CITY IS IN AGREEMENT TO ANOTHER SIX-MONTH EXTENSION TO PAY THAT.
>> IS THAT GOING TO HELP YOU? >> YEAH.
THAT WOULD HELP A LOT. >> PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. YOUR NAME? , SIR? YOUR NAME IS.
>> RANDY STOTLER. >> REBECCA STOTLER.
>> YOU KNOW, WE HAVE JUST BEEN HAVING A HARD TIME.
WE FOUND OUT OUR HOUSE HAS TERMITES.
WE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO... WE CAN'T EVEN GET UP THE $300 FOR THEM TO COME, AND THEN THEY WANT TO PUT A TENT OVER IT WHICH IS ANOTHER $2,000.% SO...
>> WELL, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM ,AND THE CITY DOESN'T EITHER.
I'M GRANTING YOU SIX MONTHS TO TRY AND HELP YOU.
IF YOU HAVE ISSUES, YOU KNOW JUST TO CONTACT THE CITY, AND THEY ALWAYS TRY AND DO WHAT'S RIGHT.
>> CAN WE PLEASE LET THEM KNOW WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE SIX MONTHS? AFTER THE SIX MONTHS, IT WOULD BECOME A LIEN AGAINST PROPERTY. THAT'S WHAT WOULD HAPPEN.
THERE WAS A REVERSION FROM THE REDUCED AMOUNT.
IT WOULD REVERT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL HIGHER AMOUNT.
IF IT IS NOT PAID WITHIN THOSE SIX MONTHS.
THE CITY WILL TAKE KIND OF PAYMENTS.
IT IS NOT A PAYMENT PLAN NECESSARILY.
S IF YOU CAN'T PAY ALL OF IT ATS YOU GO.
AND THAT WILL CUT DOWN ON THE AMOUNT.
>> RIGHT NOW IS THE AMOUNT $1,200?
>> IT IS $1,500. >> I'M SORRY.
>> DO YOU THINK YOU CAN PAY THAT WITHIN THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD?
>> I MEAN, WE CAN... >> O'DMAIVMENT LIGHT OF YOUR
TERMITE PROBLEM... >> I GOT BEHIND ON SOME OF MY
LET ME DO THIS. INSTEAD OF SIX MONTHS.
I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU NINE MONTHS.
IF YOU DON'T GET THAT $1,500 PAID WITHIN, LET'S SAY, NINE MONTHS, IT IS GOING TO GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT OF $9,440. I DON'T WANT TOP SEE YOU STUCK WITH THAT. I'LL GIVE YOU NINE MONTHS TO PAY
>> THAT WOULD BE FINE. THAT WOULD BE GREAT.
>> ALL RIGHT. WE HERE TO HELP, NOT HURT.
OUR PROBLEM IS WE HAVE A GRANDDAUGHTER WE ARE RAISING, AND SHE HAS BEEN GETTING INTO OUR BANK ACCOUNT AND GETTING ON AMAZON AND EVERYTHING. I'M WRITING BILLS TO PAY BILLS, THINKING THE MONEY IS IN THE ACCOUNT, THE BANK ACCOUNT, AND SHE IS ALREADY SPENDING IT ON AMAZON AND EVERYTHING ELSE.
CAN'T EVEN... I HAVE TO HIDE MY PURSE FROM HER.
[01:20:02]
SO SHE WON'T GET THE CREDIT... MY DEBIT CARD OR THE CHECKS.BECAUSE THEY ARE SO SAVVY AT THAT AGE.
THEY KNOW EVERYTHING. >> HOW OLD IS THE GRANDDAUGHTER?
>> WE HAVE HAD HER SINCE SHE WAS A BABY.
>> YOUR HONOR, THAT WOULD BE GREAT.
>> WILL I GET A LETTER OR SOMETHING IN THE MAIL?
>> YES. >> THERE WILL BE AN ORDER THAT
GETS SENT TO YOU. >> THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING SO PATIENT AND WAITING WITH US WHILE WE WORK THROUGH OUR
TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. >> THANK YOU.
[A. 22-2698 PK Jaycee Park Timothy Anderson Jr Heather Debevec]
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2698, JAYCEE PARK, TIMOTHY ANDERSON, JR. THAT IS 4-E.
>> GOOD MORNING, MS. DEBEVEC. >> GOOD MORNING, MA'AM.
>> WHEN YOU ARE READY. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 2226-98, JAYCEE PARK, FOR A PARKING CITATION ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 5 OF LAST YEAR. IT WAS ISSUED AS A CITATION NUMBER 18314 FOR SECTION 34-35, SUB-SECTION T, PARKING IN A SAFETY ZONE. IT IS REQUESTED THAT... FORGIVE ME. THAT IF YOU FIND THIS VIOLATION EXISTS, THAT THEY BE... THAT THEY HAVE THE TOTAL DUE OF $78.
IF NOT, THAT IT BE SENT OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
I DO HAVE PHOTOS IN WHICH TO SUBMIT.
>> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS
AS YOU OBSERVED? >> YES, THEY DO.
>> AT THIS TIME, WE WILL MOVE THEM IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> THANK YOU.
THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NOT AT THIS TIME. >> ANYONE HERE ON BEHALF OF MR. TIMOTHY ANDERSON, JR.? HE IS NOT PRESENT.
IS THERE A REPRESENTATIVE? PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE ADMITTED AS EXHIBIT 1. ON BEHALF OF THE CITY.
I DO FIND THAT HE IS IN VIOLATION OF A PARKING PROV PROVISION. CODE SECTION 34-35T, SAFETY ZONE. I'LL IMPOSE THE $50 FINEST, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL OF $78.
PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS. FAILURE TO PAY COULD BE... COULD RESULT IN THIS TICKET BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
[B. 22-3211PK South Causeway Park Yvonne Lopez McLaren Charmaine Kirkland]
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-3211, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK, YVONNE
LOPEZ MCLAREN. >> WHEN YOU ARE READY,
MS. KIRKLAND. >> GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR.
CASE NUMBER 22-3211. INITIATED ON NOVEMBER 6, 2022.
A PARKING CITATION THAT WAS ISSUED TO YVONNE LOPEZ MCLAREN AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. FOR A CODE SECTION 34-35, PROHIBITED PARKING AT ALL TIMES. A FINE OF $50, ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10. LATE FEE OF $18.
A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR WILL BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
FAILURE TO PAY SUCH FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
>> DO YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS, MS. KIRKLAND?
>> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION
AS YOU OBSERVED IT? >> YES, THEY DO.
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
>> ALL RIGHT. I FIND THAT YVONNE LOPEZ MCLAREN IS NOT PRESENT. NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON HER BEHALF. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT SHE IS THE PARTY
[01:25:03]
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I WILL FINE HER $50, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE SHE HAS 14 DAYS TO PAY.FAILURE TO PAY WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE SHE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2073, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK, THEORDORE NICHOLAS WILLEMS AND BRITTANY ANNE WILLEMS.
DO YOU HAVE ANY CASE, CHAR? >> YES.
S TO DAY. >> WHAT CASE DO YOU HAVE?
>> 22-3388. >> CAN I GET THE NAME?
>> JACQUELINE TOBIAS. >> SHE IS MOVED.
>> ALL RIGHT. >> WHERE ARE WE NOW?
[C. 22-2073 PK South Causeway Park Theordore Nicholas Willems Brittany Anne Willems Isaac Saucedo]
>> WE ARE GOOD. OUR NEXT ONE WAS GOING TO BE SOUTH COWSWAY CAUSEWAY PARK. THEORDORE NICHOLAS WILLEMS AND
BRITTANY WILLEMS. >> GOOD MORNING.
>> GOOD MORNING. >> WHEN YOU ARE READY.
>> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 22-2073. SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED BY MYSELF ON JUNE 18 OF 2022.
CITATION NUMBER IS 17967 FOR CODE SECTION 34.5, SUB-SECTION 0, POSTED NO PARKING. FINE OF $50 WITH AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND A LATE FEE OF $18.
A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATOR EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
I DO HAVE PHOTOS HERE. >> THANK YOU.
>> DO THEY FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION AS YOU
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NOT FROM ME, NO. >> THERE IS A NO PARKING SIGN RIGHT ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE. OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. I FIND THAT THEORDORE NICHOLAS WILLEMS... NEITHER THEORDORE NICKOLAS WILLEMS OR BRITTANY WILLEMS IS PRESENT THIS MORNING. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THEY ARE THE PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
LY FINE THEM A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
FAILURE TO PAY THAT AMOUNT OF TWHAN TIME PERIOD COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE CITY COUNTY COURT WHERE THEY COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU.
[D. 22-2071 PK South Causeway Park Wilson Duke Martinez Isaac Saucedo]
>> YOU ARE WELCOME. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2071, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. WILSON DUKE MARTINEZ.
>> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 22-2071, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK, WILSON DUKE MARTINEZ. THE CASE WAS INITIATED BY MYSELF ON JUNE 19 OF 2022. CITATION NUMBER IS 17971 FOR SECTIONS 34-35, SUBSECTION 0, RESTRICTED PARKING.
A FINE OF $50. ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10.
LATE FEE OF $18 WITH A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR WILL BE ASSESSED A TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. I DO HAVE PHOTOS HERE.
>> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION
AS YOU OBSERVED IT? >> YES, THEY DO.
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUM.
... AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NOT AT THIS MOMENT, NO. >> I FIND THAT WILSON DUKE MARTINEZ IS NOT PRESENT AND NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HIS BEHALF. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS.
HE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I WILL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, LATE FEE OF $18, TOTAL DUE, 78. PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
FAILURE TO PAY COULD RESULT IN THIS CASE BEING TRANSFERRED TO COUNTY COURT WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
[01:30:01]
30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU.
[E. 22-2070 PK South Causeway Park Alexa Marie Neu Isaac Saucedo]
>> YOU ARE WELCOME. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2070, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. ALEXA MARIE NEU.
>> CITATION NUMBER IS 17969. THE CODE SECTION 34-35, SUBSECTION, PARKING ON RIGHT OF WAY.
CITATION HAD A $50 FINE AND AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10.
LATE FEE $18 WITH THE TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. I HAVE PHOTOS ALSO TO PROVIDE.
>> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION
AS YOU OBSERVED IT? >> THEY DO.
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THANK YOU.
THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NOT AT IN THE MOMENT, AT THIS MOMENT.
>> ALL RIGHT. I FIND THAT ALEXA MARIE NEU IS NOT PRESENT. NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HER BEHALF. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT SHE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS VIOLATION. A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS. FAILURE TO PAY COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE SHE OR... SHE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
NEXT CASE? >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-3047.
[F. 22-3047PK 100 Blk N 2nd Street Vernon Phillips Michael Rabenecker]
100 BLOCK NORTH SECOND STREET. VERNON PHILLIPS.MICHAEL, THAT IS GOING TO BE THE LAST ONE.
>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-3047, A PARKING CITATION WRITTEN AT THE 100 BLOCK OF NORTH SECOND STREET. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 15, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A VERNON PHILLIPS. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 184 57, A PARKING CITATION, VIOLATION OF CITY CODE.
34-35Q. PARKING IN A HANDICAPPED SPACE.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $250 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $278. THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A TOTAL DUE, AS INDICATED ABOVE.
FAILURE TO PAY THE FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED.
THEYK A RAWT W ACCURATELY PORTRY THE VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT.
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS
ALL RIGHT. BASED ON THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE PRESENTED, I FIND THAT HE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I WILL FINE HIM $250 FOR PARKING IN A HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE AND $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL OF $278. HE HAS 14 DAYS TO PAY.
FAILURE TO PAY COULD RESULT IN A TICKET BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS. HE HAS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[G. 22-3011PK South Causeway Park Garardo Tapia Michael Rabenecker]
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-3011, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
GERARDO TAPIA. THAT IS GOING TO BE IN THE
>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22 22-3011. PARKING CITATION THAT WAS WRITTEN AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 16, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A GRARDA TAPIA. THE CITATION NUMBER IS 18472, A
[01:35:03]
PARKING VIOLATION OF THE CITY CODE ORDINANCE.34-35, NO PARKING AT ANY TIME. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, AND A LATE FEE OF $18. A T TOE TOTAL DUE OF $78.
FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE. THEY ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED.
THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE VIOLATIONS.
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO, YOUR HONOR. >> ALL RIGHT.
I FIND THAT MR. GERARDO TAPIA IS NOT HERE.
NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HIS BEHALF.
HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT HE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS VIOLATION.
I WILL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL OF $78. PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
FAILURE TO PAY WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE TICKET BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
[K. 22-3225PK 300 Blk Ave A Stephany Silveira Michael Rabenecker]
HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> THE NEXT CASE, 32-35.
STEPHANY SILVEIRA. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-3225.
A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE #00 BLOCK OF AVENUE A. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON NOVEMBER 12, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A STEPHANY SILVEIRA. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18528. A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY CODE ORDINANCE 34-35T. PARKING ON A SIDEWALK.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTS IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE. THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE
VIOLATIONS I WITNESSED. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, YOUR HONOR.
I FIND THAT STEPHANY SILL VEERA IS NOT PRESENT.
NEATHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HER BEHALF.
HOWEVER, I FIND THAT BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, SHE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PARKING ON SIDEWALK. I WILL IMPOSE THE $50 FINE.
$10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL OF $78.
THE FEE SHOULD BE PAID WITHIN 14 DAYS.
FAILURE TO DO SO COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE SHE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS. 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2845.
[L. 22-2845PK South Causeway Park Francis X Schmidt, IV Michael Rabenecker]
SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. FRANCIS X SMITH.>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEST CAKES BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-2845. A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 30, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A FRANCIS SCHMIDT, THE CITATION NUMBER IS 18130.
A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE 34-35S, PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR WILL BE ASSESSED A TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FUN WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED.
THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE VIOLATIONS I WITNESSED.
>> THE PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, YOUR HONOR.
>> ALL RIGHT. I FIND THAT FRANCIS SCHMIDT IS NOT PRESENTST. NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON HIS OR HER BEHALF. HOWEVER, WILL IMPOSE A FINE FOR PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
$10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND AN $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
THE PARTY SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IF HE FAILS TO PAY WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME, THE CASE COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE COUNTY
[01:40:02]
COURT SYSTEM WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.[M. 22-2846PK South Causeway Park Tionne Leshay Jones Michael Rabenecker]
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2846, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-2846. A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 30, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A TIONNE LESHAY JONES. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18131, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35S.
PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
THE CITY IS SCAG THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE THE REQUESTS IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR WILL BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. FAILURE TO PAY...
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. THANK YOU.
>> YOU ARE WELCOME. >> I FIND THAT TIONNE LESHAY JONES IS NOT PRESENT, NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON HER BEHALF. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I WILL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE PARTY SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT FAILURE TO PAY THAT AMOUNT COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE SHE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
[N. 22-3025PK 600 Blk Parkway Drive Tommie Lee Brown Michael Rabenecker]
THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
>> NEXT CASE IS 22-3025. 600 BLOCK PARKWAY DRIVE.
TOMMIE LEE BROWN. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22 22-3025, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 600 BLOCK OF PARKWAY DRIVE.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 15, 2022.
THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A TOMMIE LEE BROWN.
THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18597, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35S, PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED AND AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR WILL BE AZESTED A TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE.
THEY ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED. THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE
VIOLATIONS AS I WITNESSED IT. >> THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO, YOUR HONOR. >> I FIND THAT MR. TOMMIE LEE BROWN IS NOT PRESENT, NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON HIS BEHALF. HOWEVER, I WILL IMPOSE A $50 FINE FOR PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND A LATE FEE OF $18.
FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THIS IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
HOWEVER, IF IT IS NOT PAID, THE PARTY SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT THE CASE COULD BE FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
[O. 22-2844PK South Causeway Park Simone Mion Michael Rabenecker]
30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
>> NEXT CASE IS 22-2834, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
SIMONE MION. >> THE NEXT CASE, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 6, 2022.
VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A SIMONE MION.
CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18142, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE. 34-350.
PROHIBITED PARKING AT ALL TIMES. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED AND AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL OF $78.
THE CITY REQUESTS IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. I HAVE PHOTOS THERE TO INTRODUCE AS EVIDENCE. THEY ARE DIET AND TIME-STAMPED.
THEY ACCURATELY POR DAY THE VIOLATIONS I WITNESSED.
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. THANK YOU.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, YOUR HONOR.
>> ALL RIGHT. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS, AND THAT SIMONE MION IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
LY IMPOSE A FINE OF $50, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL OF $78 DUE.
[01:45:02]
THAT IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS. FAILURE TO PAY COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT WHERE HE OR SHE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
[P. 22-3031PK 100 Blk Orange Ave Arturo Ruiz, Jr. Michael Rabenecker]
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-3031, 100 BLOCK ORANGE AVENUE.
ARTURO RUIZ, JR. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS 22-3031, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF ORANGE AVENUE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 12, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS AN ARTURO RUIZ, JR. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18594, PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35P.
PARKING BEYOND THE POSTED TWO-HOUR TIME LIMIT.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION GIVESES,...
EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. SO I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DIET AND TIME-STAMPED. THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE
VIOLATIONS AS I WITNESSED IT. >> THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT. BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT ARTURO RUIZ, JR. IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I WILL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78, PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
SO YOU CAN PAY THAT... FAILURE TO PAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
THE PARTY COULD A INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
THAT WILL BE STATED IN THE ORDER.
[Q. 22-2841PK South Causeway Park Errol Lloyd Bajoo Michael Rabenecker]
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> NEXT CASE IS 22-2841, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. ERROL LLOYD BAJOO.
>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-2841. A PARKING VIOLATION OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 7, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS AN ERROL LLOYD BAJOO. CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18 18148, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE.
34-35S, PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED.
AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND A LATE FEE OF $10 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTS IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED.
THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT.
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, URINE.
... NO, YOUR HONOR. >> I FIND THAT ERROL LLOYD BAJOO IS NOT HERE. NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON HIS BEHALF. HOWEVER, I DO FIND HIM IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE PARKING ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
I'LL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THIS IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
THE PARTY SHOULD BE ADVISED TO PAY WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME.
0 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> ... 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[R. 22-2860PK 200 Blk North Indian River Drive Colten James Difrancesco Michael Rabenecker]
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> NEXT CASE IS 22-2816.
200 BLOCK NORTH RIVER ROAD, COLTON JAMES DEFRANCESCO.
>> A PARKING VIOLATION OCCURRED AT THE 200 BLOCK OF NORTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 13, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS COLTON JAMES DEFRA DEFRANCESCO.
THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18400, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35S. PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. FAILURE TO PAY MAY RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
I HAVE PHOTOS THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED.
[01:50:04]
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
>> YOU CAN STAY SITTING. >> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
I FIND THAT COLTON JAMES DEFRAN CHESS CO.... DEFRANCESCO IS NOT HERE. HOWEVER, HE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE. I WILL IMPOSE THE $50 FINE, A LATE FEE OF $18, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE.
TOTAL DUE OF $78. HE HAS 14 DAYS TO PAY.
FAILURE TO PAY COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS. 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[S. 22-2858PK South Causeway Park Laurie JeanTaylor Michael Rabenecker]
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2858, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. LAWYER ARE JEAN TAYLOR.
LAURIE JEAN TAYLOR. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22 22-2858, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 14, 2022.
THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A LAURIE JEAN TAYLOR.
PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34 WILL HAVE 35O.
PROHIBITED PARKING AT ALL TIMES. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. FAILURE TO PAY WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
I HAVE PHOTOS THAT ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE VIOLATION AS I
WITNESSED IT. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. >> LAURIE JEAN TAYLOR IS NOT PRESENT. NEEPTER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HER BEHALF. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT SHE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I'LL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, LATE FEE OF $18.
A TOTAL OF $7. ALL THAT IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS. FAILURE TO PAY WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. SHE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES
[U. 22-2857PK South Causeway Park Matthew Charles Livermore Michael Rabenecker]
AND COSTS. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2857 SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
MATTHEW CHARLES LIVERMORE. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-2857.
A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 14, 2022.
THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A MATTHEW CHARLES RIVERMORE. THE... LIVERMORE.
THE PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35S.
PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE TOTAL DUE WILL BE AS INDICATED ABOVE. SO I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED. THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE
VIOLATIONS AS I WITNESSED IT. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ALL RIGHT.
I FIND THAT MR. MATTHEW CHARLES RIVERMORE IS NOT PRESENT.
NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HIS BEHALF.
BASED ON THE EVEREST AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT HE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
LY IMPOSE A $50 FINE, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE AND LATE FEE OF $18. TOTAL OF $78.
THAT AMOUNT IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
FAILURE TO PAY COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES
[V. 22-2991PK 100 N US Hwy 1 Matthew Aaron Voltes Michael Rabenecker]
AND COSTS. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-2991, MATTHEW AARON VOLTES.
>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-2991. A PARKING VIOLATION THAT IS OCCURRED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF NORTH U.S. HIGHWAY ONE.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 7, 2022.
THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A MATTHEW AARON VOLTES.
THE CITATION NUMBER IS 18575, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35T. PARKED IN A SAFETY ZONE.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSES, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE AZESTED A TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
FAILURE TO PAY THE FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING
[01:55:03]
FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODOUSE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED.
THEY PORTRAY THE VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT.
>> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1,
THE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> IT WILL BE ADMIT AS SUCH.
THANK YOU. >> YOUR HONOR, THE PICTURES YOU ARE LOOKING AT, THIS IS A BIKE RACK FOR BICYCLES, NOT
MOTORCYCLES. >> IT IS IN THE PARKING GARAGE.
>> YES, YOUR HONOR. >> ALL RIGHT.
I FIND THAT MATTHEW AARON VOLTES IS NOT PRESENT.
NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON HIS BEHALF.
HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT HE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I WILL IMPOSE A $50 FINE FOR PARKING IN IN A SAFETY ZONE.
$10 ADMINISTRATION FEE. A LATE FEE OF $18.
A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THAT IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
THE PARTY SHOULD BE ADVISED FAILURE TO PAY WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES
AND COSTS. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
[W. 22-2305PK 1600 Blk Binney Drive Amy I. Bittner Michael Rabenecker]
>> NEXT CASE IS 22-2305. 1600 BLOCK, BINNEY DRIVE.
AMY BITTNER. >> THE NEXT CASE IS 22-2305.
A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT BINNEY DRIVE.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 17, 2022.
THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS AN AMY BITTNER.
THE CITATION NUMBER IS 18097, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35S. PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE CITY THE ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE CITY HAS REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR WILL BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DIET AND TIME-STAMPED. THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE
VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, YOUR HONOR.
>> I FIND THAT AMY BITTNER IS NOT PRESENT.
NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HER BEHALF.
HOWEVER, I DO FIND THAT SHE IS IN VIOLATION FOR PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND IMPOSE A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE. TOTAL DUE, $78.
PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS. THE PARTY SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT FAILURE TO PAY WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE SHE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
[X. 22-2870PK South Causeway Park Troy Patrick Allen Michael Rabenecker]
30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
>> NEXT CASE IS 22-2870. SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
TROY PATRICK ALLEN. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-2870.
A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 20, 2022.
THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS ARY TO PATRICK ALLEN.
THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18416.
A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE 34-35S.
PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
FAILURE TO PAY WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING MOVED TO THE
COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. >> AT THIS TIME, THE THE CITY WILL MOVE IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. I FIND THAT TROY PATRICK ALLEN IS NOT HERE. NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HIS BEHALF. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVEREST AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND HE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I WILL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, A $10 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE, $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THAT IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS. AND THE PARTY SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT FAILURE TO PAY THE FINE WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
[Y. 22-2871PK South Causeway Park Jane Cristie Snead Michael Rabenecker]
>> NEXT CASE IS 22-2871. SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
JANE SNEAD. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE.
>> YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-2871. A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 20, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A JANE SNEAD. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS
[02:00:02]
18417. A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35O. PROHIBITED PARKING AT ALL TIMES.THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
FAILURE TO PAY WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING MOVED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. I HAVE PHOTOS THAT ARE DATE AND
TIME-STAMPED. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
THANK YOU. I FIND THAT JANE SNEAD IS NOT HERE. NEATHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HER BEHALF. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY, I FIND THAT SHE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I'LL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, 18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL OF $78.
THAT IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS. THE PARTY SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT FAILURE TO PAY WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE SHE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
[Z. 22-2863PK 500 Blk North 2nd Street Jaida S. McCarthy McGraw Michael Rabenecker]
>> NEXT CASE IS 22-2863. 500 BLOCK, NORTH SECOND STREET.
JAIDA MCCARTHY MCGRAW. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 500 BLOCK OF NORTH SECOND STREET. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 21, 2022. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A JAIDA MCCARTHY MCGRAW.
THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18421.
A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE.
34-35T. PARKING... PARKED FACING THE WRONG DIRECTION. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXIST EXS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE RESULTS IN A CITATION BEING MOVED TO THE COUNTY COURT
SYSTEM. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. ALL RIGHT.
I FIND THAT JAIDA MCCARTHY MCGRAW IS NOT PRESENT.
NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON HER BEHALF.
HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT SHE IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I WILL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. YOU HAVE 14 DAYS TO PAY.
BE ADVISED THAT FAILURE TO PAY IN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TURNED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.
SHE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
[AA. 22-2861PK South Causeway Park Saver LLC Michael Rabenecker]
30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
>> NEXT CASE IS 22-2861. SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
SAVER LLC. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 22-2861.
A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 30, 2022.
THE VIOLATOR CAME IN... THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A SAVER LLC. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18127. A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35O. PROHIBITED PARKING AT ALL TIMES.
THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, AND A LATE FEE OF $18.
FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A TOTAL DUE AS INDICATED ABOVE.
FAILURE TO PAY THE FINE RESULTS IN THE CITATION BEING TURNED
OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> THANK YOU. IT WILL BE ADMIT AS SUCH.
I FIND THAT SAVER LLC IS NOT PRESENT.
NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON THAT ENTITY'S BEHALF.
HOWEVER, I DO FIND THAT THEY ARE THE PARTY... IT IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I'LL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE COMPANY HAS 14 DAYS TO PAY. THEY SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT FAILURE TO PAY COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED OVER TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE IT COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS. 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[BB. 22-3020PK 700 Blk Grandview Blvd Brandon Richard Ingersoll Michael Rabenecker]
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> NEXT CASE IS 22-3020.
700 BLOCK GRAND VIEW BOULEVARD. BRANDON RICHARD INGERSOLL.
>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER
[02:05:01]
22-3020, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 700 BLOCK OF GRAND VIEW BOULEVARD. THE CASE WAS INITIAED ON OCTOBER 16, 2022. THE VOYLY A OR THE IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A BRANDON RICHARD INGERSOLL.THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 18468.
A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE.
34-35 Z. OBSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC.
THE CITY IS ASKING A $50 FINE BE ASESD, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78.
THE CITY REQUESTED IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR WILL BE ASSESSED THE TOTAL DUE, AS INDICATED ABOVE. SO I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED. THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE
VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.
>> THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, YOUR HONOR.
>> ALL RIGHT. I FIND THAT BRANDON RICHARD INGERSOLL IS NOT PRESENT. NEITHER IS A REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON HIS BEHALF. HOWEVER, I WILL FIND HIM GUILTY OF VIOLATION AS CHARGED. A $50 FINE, A LATE FEE OF $18, AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 FOR A TOTAL OF $78.
THAT IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS. HE SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT FAILURE TO PAY THAT WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE HE COULD INCUR ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS.
>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> YOU ARE WELCOME.
[DD. 22-2983PK 100 Blk N 18th Street Milton Bazile Christine Noel-Bazile Michael Rabenecker]
>> OUR NEXT CASE, 22-2983. 100 BLOCK NORTH 18TH STREET.
MILTON BAZILE AND CHRISTINE NOEL BAZILE.
>> YOUR HONOR, THIS IS CASE NUMBER 22-2983.
A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF% NORTH 18TH STREET. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 7, 2022. THE VIOLATORS IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS MILTON BAZILE AND CHRISTINE NOEL BAZILE.
THE CITATION NUMBER IS 18578. >> A,S A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE, 34-35, PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
THE CITY ASKS THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AND AN ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10 AND A LATE FEE OF $18.
FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN A CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME-STAMPED. THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE
VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> IT WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH. I FIND THAT NEITHER MILTON BAZILE NOR CHRISTINE NOEL BAZILE IS PRESENT.
HOWEVER, I DO FIND THEM RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION.
I WILL IMPOSE A $50 FINE, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL DUE OF $78. THAT IS PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS.
THE PARTY SHOULD BE ADVISES THAT FAILURE TO PAY THAT AMOUNT OF MONEY WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME COULD RESULT IN THE CASE BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM WHERE THEY COULD INCUR
ADDITIONAL FEES AND COSTS. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
>> LET ME DOUBLE-CHECK. >> MICHAEL IS DONE.
>> I KNOW MICHAEL IS. >> SO YOU ARE GOING TO READ THIS
>> WE HAVE TWO. >> WE HAVE TWO MORE.
>> COULD I HAVE THAT CASE SO I CAN GET THE PHONE NUMBER SO I CAN CALL HIM? 2425 MOHAWK?
>> I THOUGHT WE WERE GOING TO DO THE OTHER ONE FIRST.
>> I MEAN, IT IS UP TO YOU REALLY.
WE CAN... THIS WAS A TELEPHONE.
[B. 22-1625CE 2425 Mohawk Avenue Thomas D Williams and Associates LLC Heather Debevec]
SORRY. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-1625, 24 2425 MOHAWK AVENUE. THOMAS WILLIAMS AND ASSOCIATES LLC. I'M GOING TO BE CALLING THIS ONE
[02:10:19]
TOM WILLIAMS. >> GOOD MORNING.
THIS IS KATHERINE CALLING YOU LIVE IN THE COMMISSIONER CHAMBERS FOR OUR HEARING THIS MORNING.
I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL YOUR CASE.
THE CITY WILL PRESENT THEIR PART FIRST.
THEN YOU WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO SPEAK AFTER.
>> ALL RIGHT. OUR NEXT CASE IS 22-1625.
2425 MOHAWK AVENUE. THOMAS D. WILLIAMS AND
>> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 221625, 2524 MOHAWK AVENUE.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON MAY 27 OF LAST YEAR.
FOR SECTION 2419, 2420, 2421, SUB-SECTIONS 1 AND 5.
NUISANCE OBJECT AND OUTSIDE STORAGE.
IT IS REQUESTED THAT THEY REMOVE, BRING IN OR PLACE IN A SHED BUCKETS, CONTAINERS, TARPS, AND OTHER LOOSE ITEMS FROM THE YARD. PROVIDE PROOF OF VALID REGISTRATION AND OPERATABILITY FOR THE MINI VAN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLE AND BLUE NISSAN IN THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY.
REPAIR THE FENCE WHERE IT HAS BEEN DISCONNECTED AND FALLING.
THE CITY IS REQUESTING IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED.
I HAVE MET WITH MR. WILLIAMS AND HIS TENANT, AT THE PROPERTY.
FRIDAY THE 13TH. A LOT OF THE OUTSIDE STORAGE HAS BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY PICKED UP. THERE IS STILL SOME TRAILERS AND STUFF IN THE BACK THAT WERE CONSIDERED NON-OP WITHOUT PROOF.
WE ASKED FOR PROOF. THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF REMOVING THE FENCE. I DO HAVE PHOTOS IN WHICH TO%
SUBMIT. >> DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION AS YOU OBSERVED IT?
>> YES. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> THANK YOU. >> ARE YOU SPEAKING WITH ME?
>> THE LOT STILL NEEDS... A LOT STILL NEEDS TO BE DONE?
>> PART OF THE FENCE HAD BEEN REMOVED.
THEY HAD A SMALL SECTION TO REMOVE.
I HAD ASKED FOR PROOF OF ON RABILITY FOR SOME TRAILERS ON
THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY. >> MR. WILLIAMS, HOW DO YOU
RESPOND? >> MR. WILLIAMS, I'M SPEAKING
WHAT WAS THE QUESTION? I'M SORRY.
>> HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THESE ALLEGATIONS?
>> OH. WELL, FIRST, I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT BEING A GOOD PROPERTY MANAGER. I HAVEN'T BEEN UP THERE IN A WHILE. WHEN I DID GO UP THERE, I WAS SHOCKED THAT IT WAS A MESS. AND I WAS GOING TO EVICT THEM BECAUSE I DON'T WANT THOSE TYPE OF PEOPLE IN MY PROPERTY.
BUT AFTER TALKING TO HIM AND TELLING HIM THAT HE NEEDS TO CLEAN IT UP OR, YOU KNOW, PAY SOME CONSEQUENCES, I WENT BACK UP A WEEK LATER, AND I WAS SHOCKED AGAIN THAT IT WAS JUST ABOUT ALL CLEANED UP. I DID MEET WITH HEATHER THERE.
AND THERE IS REALLY FOUR THINGS THAT I WROTE DOWN THAT STILL NEED TO BE ACCOMPLISHED, BUT YOU KNOW, I WOULD SAY 90% OF IT IS DONE. THE OTHER, AS YOU MENTIONED, THERE IS A FENCE THAT STILL NEEDS... A PARTIAL FENCE THAT STILL NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. JUST A SMALL SECTION.
AND THEN I DON'T KNOW IF HE HAS EVER COMPLIED WITH THE REGISTRATION ON THE BOAT AND TRAILER OR NOT.
THE GARBAGE IS OBVIOUSLY NO BIG DEAL.
MOVING THAT INTO THE BACK. THERE WAS A DUMP TRUCK ON THE LOT WHICH HAS BEEN REMOVED. SO THOSE ARE THE FOUR THINGS THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN CARE OF. BUT WE HAVE BEEN MAKING VERY GOOD PROGRESS TOWARDS BEING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY AND
[02:15:06]
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> I'M SORRY.
COULD YOU REPEAT THAT? >> ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> YOU DON'T HAVE TO. I'M JUST ASKING.
I NEED TO FIND OUT WHETHER HE GOT THE REGISTRATION FOR THE BOAT AND TRAILER. I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO TALK TO HIM. AND EVERYTHING ELSE, EVERYTHING SHOULD BE DONE BY THIS WEEKEND. FROM WHAT I HAVE... FROM WHAT I GATHER. AND KRP HEATHER... HEATHER CAN GO BACK OUT AND VERIFY EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN DONE.
IT HAS BEEN GOOD WORKING WITH HEATHER.
SHE IS A VERY NICE PERSON. WE MET.
AND AGAIN, I APOLOGIZE. I'M VERY GOOD AT COLLECTING RENT. I'M NOT VERY GOOD AT BEING A PROPERTY MANAGER. IT WAS, YOU KNOW, AN EYE-OPENER FOR ME TO BE MORE ATTENTIVE TO MY PROPERTY.
AND IT WON'T HAPPEN AGAIN. >> ALL RIGHT.
THIS CASE INITIATED BACK IN MAY OF LAST YEAR.
IT HAS BEEN A LONG TIME, AND THERE ARE STILL SOME THINGS THAT
>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO, MA'AM.
I THINK THAT IS IT. I WASN'T I WARE OF IT BACK IN MAY. IF I WAS AWARE OF IT BACK IN MAY, THEN I WOULD HAVE ADDRESSED IT AT THAT TIME.
YOU KNOW, THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT.
THAT I WASN'T AWARE OF IT. I DIDN'T... IT WAS MAILED TO ME.
EITHER I THREW IT AWAY OR I JUST WASN'T AWARE OF THE FACT THAT I HAD AN ISSUE WITH THE CITY ORDINANCE, VIOLATING ANY TYPE OF
ALL RIGHT. ON THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED, I FIND THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AT 2425 MOHAWK AVENUE AND THAT THOMAS WILLIAMS AND ASSOCIATES LLC IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATION. I RECOGNIZE THE FACT THAT SOME WORK HAS BEEN DONE TOWARD CLEANING UP THE PROPERTY, BUT THERE IS STILL A LOT MORE THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.
I IMPOSE THIS FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION THAT YOU BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.
IF NOT, A FINE OF $100 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED.
YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. ANY QUESTIONS?
>> NO, MA'AM. THAT IS VERY FAIR.
ONCE I GET EVERYTHING DONE, WHAT DO I DO FROM THERE?
I THINK EVERYTHING... THERE IS REALLY NOT... YOU MENTIONED THERE IS A LOT TO BE DONE. I DISAGREE.
THERE IS NOT A LOT TO BE DONE. BECAUSE AS I MENTIONED, ABOUT 90% OF IT IS DONE. I THINK HEATHER WOULD AGREE WITH
WELL, YOU'VE GOT 30 DAYS. HE SHOULD BE ABLE TO GET IT DONE. YOU OR HE SHOULD BE ABLE TO GET IT DONE WITHIN THAT PERIOD OF TIME.
>> SO OKAY. WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> THANK YOU, MR. WILLIAMS. >> OKAY.
>> OKAY. YOU GUYS HAVE A GREAT DAY.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. >> YOU, TOO.
[A. 19-1752 CE 1016 Mayflower Rd Sayco Equity Fund K LLC Peggy Arraiz]
>> NEXT CASE? >> OUR LAST CASE IS 19-1752, 1016 MAY FLOWER ROAD, CYCLE EXWE IT IS FUND... CYCLE EQUITY FUND
KLLC. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 19-17 52, 1016 MAYFLOWER ROAD OF SAYCO EXWE... EQUITY FUND LLC.
THE CASE INITIATED ON JULY 10 OF 2019.
THE VIOLATIONS WERE IPMC, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.
IPMCC304.2, PROTECTIVE TREATMENT, EXTERIOR STRUCTURE GENERAL, AND SECTION 16-464748, SUB-SECTION 1 AND 5 FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE. ON AUGUST 17 OF 2022, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE PELLETIER FOUND THE VIOLATION EXISTED AND ORDERED TEN DAYS TO COMPLY. OR A FINE OF $150 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. THE ACTION DATE... SORRY.
JUNE 17, 2020. THE CASE WAS SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING. AND THAT WAS CONTINUED AT THAT
[02:20:01]
TIME. NOVEMBER 17, OF 2021, CASE SCHEDULED FOR HEARING AND WAS CONTINUED AGAIN.NOVEMBER 23 OF 2021. A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED. PERMIT WAS NEVER ISSUED.
DECEMBER 1, 2021, THE CASE SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING WAS CONTINUED AGAIN. JUNE 22, OF 2022, THE CASE SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING WAS CONTINUED AGAIN.
AUGUST 17, 2022, AS MENTIONED EARLIER, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE PELLETIER DID FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTED AND ORDERED TEN DAYS TO COMPLY OR A FINE OF $150 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
SEPTEMBER OF THAT SAME YEAR, 2022, SEPTEMBER 19, A DEMOLITION PERMIT ANALLY WAS... PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED.
AN EMAIL... E-MAILED FROM THE COORDINATOR FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. NO.
WE GOT AN EMAIL FROM THE CONTRACTOR STATING THAT THE PROPERTY WAS SOLD AND REQUESTED TO TERMINATE THE NOC.
ON OCTOBER 18, 2022, AN AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WAS SENT TO THE OWNER. NOVEMBER 3, 2022, A LETTER WAS SENT OUT. NOVEMBER 16, A REQUEST RECEIVED FROM THE OWNER. NO ACTIVE PERMITS APPLICATIONS, AND THE BALANCE AS OF JANUARY 12 OF THIS YEAR, 2023, ARE $14,120.
I DO HAVE PHOTOS OF THE PRO PROPERTY, IF YOU WANT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THEM. THIS CASE ACTUALLY WAS A CASE THAT WAS INITIATED BY ANOTHER CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
THTHEY ARE NO LONGER EMPLOY WITH THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE.
IT WAS KIND OF, LIKE, ON HOLD, THEN COVID HAPPENED.
THAT KIND OF DELAYED THE PROCESS AS WELL.
SO IT GOT TO THE POINT WHERE TIME PASSED, AND I ENDED UP SENDING OUT THE ACTUAL NOTICE OF VIOLATION, BUT NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE AT THE TIME. OR AS OF NOW.
>> AND THE PHOTOGRAPHS YOU HAVE, YOU WENT OUT YESTERDAY TO LOOK
>> THESE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT HOW THE
PROPERTY LOOKS AS OF YESTERDAY? >> CORRECT.
I DO WANT TO STATE, THOUGH, THE OUTSIDE STORAGE HAS BEEN COMPLIED. THAT IS ABOUT IT.
OTHER THAN THAT, THE PROPERTY CONTINUES TO LOOK THE SAME.
>> OKAY. SO THE LAST VIOLATION THAT IS ON
>> EVERYTHING ELSE STILL REMAINS IN VIOLATION.
>> THAT IS CORRECT. >> AT THIS TIME, THE CITY WILL MOVE IN AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, THE PHOTOGRAPHS.
>> THANK YOU. THEY WILL BE ADMITTED AS SUCH.
SO THE RECOMMENDATION? >> THAT IS TO BE...
>> SO... IT LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVEN'T DONE MUCH TO BRING THE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE. THERE IS NO REPRESENTATIVE HERE ON BEHALF OF THEM FOR THE RECORD.
>> THEY ARE CONTESTING. IT IS A NEW OWNER AS WELL.
SO... HOLD ON A SECOND. >> THERE IS A NEW OWNER?
>> I MEAN BEFORE. THERE WAS A NEW OWNER.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, I WILL LEAVE THIS THE YOUR DISCRETION.
WE WILL HANDLE THIS HOW YOU DEEM APPROPRIATE.
THE REQUEST IS BY THEM FOR THE MASI.
THEY FAILED TO APPEAR. WE CAN CONTINUE WITH THE HEARING, PRESENTING IT. AND YOU CAN MAKE THE DECISION WITHOUT THEM HERE OR IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO STRIKE THE HEARING FOR THEIR NONAPPEARANCE, THEN WE CAN STRIKE THE HEARING FOR THEIR NONAPPEARANCE. WE ARE AT THE POINT OF WANTING TO IMPOSE THE LIEN. I WOULD... OUR PREFERENCE WOULD BE TO GO FORWARD WITH THE MASI HEARING AND IMPOSE THE LIEN.
AT THIS POINT, OR MR. SAUCEDO, ARE YOU IN AGREEMENT TO REDUCE
THE AMOUNT OWED TO ANY AMOUNT? >> NO.
I MEAN, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION, AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE BESIDES THE OUTSIDE STORAGE.
I DON'T SEE WHY WE SHOULD MOVE FORWARDS TO THAT DIRECTION.
>> SO THEN AT THIS POINT, OUR REQUEST WOULD BE TO CONTINUE THE HEARING IN THEIR ABSENCE TO IMPOSE THE LIEN.
[02:25:01]
THE BALANCE OF WHICH AS OF JANUARY 12, 2023 WAS $14,120.YOU CAN SEE FROM THE PHOTOS, IT IS STILL NOT IN COMPLIANCE.
>> AND THEY DID RECEIVE NOTICE OF THIS HEARING.
I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE WHICH DATE THAT WAS, BUT AT ONE OF THE HEARINGS, I WANT TO SAY IT WAS THE ONE IN AUGUST, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, SOMEONE DID SHOW UP, AND THEY WERE AWARE OF SITUATION. THEIR GOAL WAS TO DEMOLISH THE PROPERTY, BUT I MEAN, THAT NEVER KIND OF WENT THROUGH.
BUT THEY ARE AWARE OF THE SITUATION.
I MEAN, WE ARE HERE BECAUSE OF THEM.
THEY WENT AHEAD AND REQUESTED THIS HEARING.
>> WE DON'T HAVE ANY ACTIVE PERMITS FOR THEM.
>> WE DON'T HAVE ACTIVE PERMITS. >> THIS CASE WAS INITIATED JULY
AT THE TIME, I KNOW COVID... THE REASON WHY IT TOOK THIS LONG, I KNOW PART OF IT WAS COVID. I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE PRIOR TO COVID, WHAT HAPPENED. AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THIS WAS A CASE THAT WAS INITIATED BY ANOTHER CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER THAT IS NO LONGER WITH THE CITY SOLVE FORT PIERCE.
I CAN TELL YOU THAT COVID WAS PART OF THE DELAY WHY IT TOOK SO
LONG AND... >> THEY SCHEDULED A HEARING FOR JUNE. THAT WAS CONTINUED, NOVEMBER 17, 2021. THAT WAS CONTINUED.
DECEMBER 1, 2021. THE CASE WAS CONTINUED.
CASE SCHEDULED FOR HEARING. CONTINUED.
>> IT LOOKS LIKE THEY ARE JUST NOT RESPONDING.
>> THE ONLY WAY WE WOULD HAVE SET UP THE MSAI HEARING WAS IN A A... IF THEY SENT A LETTER, A RESPONSE FROM THEM.
DO WE HAVE THAT LETTER? >> THAT IS IT RIGHT THERE.
>> THIS IS IT. THAT IS FROM NOVEMBER 16.
>> YES, SIR. I'LL READ IT INTO THE RECORD FROM THEM. IT IS FROM SAYCO ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC. DATED NOVEMBER 16, 2022.
CASE NUMBER 1900001752. THIS CORRESPONDENCE IS IN RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE DATED NOVEMBER 3, 2022.
I'M CONTESTING THIS ALLEGED NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE.
AUGUST 25, 2022, WE ORDERED AN ASBESTOS SURVEY AND SAMPLING REPORT. ENCLOSED.
THIS REPORT IS NECESSARY TO SUBMIT A DEMOLITION PERMIT TO THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. AN APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR A BUILDING PERMIT AND CLOSED. WE SUBMITTED THE REPORT TO THE CITY WITH THE FEES FOR THE PERMIT IN THE APPLICATION.
I HAVE ALSO ADDED THE CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION ENCLOSED.
TO DATE WE HAVE NOT HEARD FROM THE ORGANIZATION OTHER THAN NOTICES OR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF REPAIRS.
BY WHICH WE ARE TRYING TO DEMOLISH THE ASSET TO HELP THE BEAUTIFICATION OF THE COMMUNITY BASED ON THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED, THERE SHOULD BE NO REASON TO IMPOSE A LIEN OR FINE.
HOWEVER, THE DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE REVIEWED AND A PERMIT ISSUED.
CORDIALLY, TROY GAGLIARDI, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF SAYCO EQUITY FUND, LP AND SAYCO MANAGEMENT ASSET LLC.
YOU INDICATED THAT THE PERMIT WAS CANCELED BY REQUEST OF THE
WHAT I HAVE ON MY NOTES HERE IS THAT ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2022, A DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED.
IT STATES THAT IT WAS VOIDED ON 10-26 OF 2022.
IT SAYS THAT AN EMAIL FROM THE CONTRACTOR THAT THE PROPERTY WAS SOLD AND REQUEST TO TERMINATE NOC.
>> DO YOU HAVE THE RETURN CARD FOR THE NOTICE OF TODAY'S
HEARING? >> THERE IS NO RETURN CARD FOR THAT. THAT DOESN'T GET SENT OUT
CERTIFIED. >> THAT ONE YOU JUST SEND
IT IS AT THEIR REQUEST. >> RIGHT.
>> WE CAN TRY AND GIVE THEM A CALL, IF YOU WOULD FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE DOING. THAT THERE IS A PHONE NUMBER ON
I MEAN, I'M LOOKING AT RULE 14 HERE.
[02:30:02]
FOR IMPOSITION OF LIENS. >> YES, MA'AM.
>> AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE DO EVERYTHING THAT IS RIGHT.
IT SAYS HERE IN THE EVENT THAT THE DEPARTMENT FINDS THAT THE RESPONDENT HAS NOT TIMELY COMPLIED EITHER WITH THE TIME OF WRITTEN ORDER AS, END THED PURSUANT TO THESE RULES, SHALL PREPARE AN AFFIDAVIT DETAILING AND DOCUMENTING THE NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE'S ORDER.
AND THEN WE SHALL SEND WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO THE RESPONDENT BY REGULAR MAIL OF THE NONCOMPLIANCE ALONG WITH THE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT. AND THE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF THE NONCOMPLIANCE. SHALL INFORM THE RESPONDENT OF THE NONCOMPLIANCE DUE TO THE CONTINUED VIOLATION OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE'S ORDER AND THAT A LIEN SHALL BE FILED 20 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE WRITTEN NOTICE UNLESS A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR A HEARING TO CONTEST THE FINDING OF NONCOMPLIANCE IS RECEIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN 20 DAYS.
IF A HEARING IS REQUESTED, THE LIEN SHALL NOT BE FILED AND A PUBLIC RECORD SHALL BE COMP COMPLETED.
PROCEDURALLY, NOTICE OF THE NONCOMPLIANCE HAS TO GO OUT AND
AN AFFIDAVIT. >> WE DID ALL OF THAT.
>> THAT IS WHY THEY SENT THE LETTER REQUESTING HEARING.
>> MR. SAUCEDO? >> CAN WE PULL UP THE PROPERTY
APPRAISER REAL QUICK? >> THE PROPERTY APPRAISER IS UP.
>> I DON'T HAVE IT. >> THAT WAS COPY OF THE CARD.
IT WASN'T THE WHOLE... YEAH. SORRY.
PROPERTY SEARCH. PROPERTY SEARCH.
>> THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTINUES TO BE THE SAME.
WE ALSO HAVE A PROPERTY TAX CARD FROM 2019.
WITH THE SAME OWNERSHIP. THE PROPERTY HASN'T BEEN SOLD SINCE APRIL 19 OF 2018. SO I MEAN, THEY ARE AWARE OF THE SITUATION. UNLESS I'M ASSUMING THAT MAYBE... THAT CELL MAYBE DIDN'T GO THROUGH.
>> YOU WANT ME TO TRY CALLING? >> I MEAN, THEY DO KNOW THAT WE HAVE A HEARING TODAY. RIGHT?
>> YES. THEY SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED THAT LETTER. IT WAS SENT TO THE SAME ADDRESS AS ALWAYS. THE ADDRESS HASN'T CHANGED.
[02:35:19]
>> I MEAN, I WASN'T AT THE PRE-HEARING.
I WOULD JUST MOVE FORWARD. >> I'M READY TO MOVE FORWARD.
I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR. >> THIS IS TAKING...
>> I MEAN, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE, MR. SAUCEDO?
>> ALL RIGHT. >> WWE ARE READY FOR A RULING.
>> BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE RECORD, ALL RIGHT? I FIND THAT THE PARTIES... I'M GOING TO IMPOSE THE LIEN.
AND SAY THAT... IN THE AMOUNT OF, IS IT $14,120 STILL?
>> THAT WAS AS OF JANUARY 12. >> JANUARY 12.
OKAY. >> WE CAN DO THE CURRENT AMOUNT.
>> YES. WE CAN DO A CURRENT AMOUNT.
>> OKAY. >> LET ME KNOW WHAT THAT IS.
>> MY COMPUTER HAS ACTUALLY ALREADY DIED.
>> MINE DID, TOO. IT WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL $150 PER DAY FROM THE JANUARY 12 DATE.
>> CORRECT. >> IMPOSE A LIEN BEGINNING WITH THE JANUARY 12 AMOUNT OF $14,120 AND FOR EACH DAY THEREAFTER, IMPOSE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $150 PER DAY.
DUE TO THEIR CONTINUED VIOLATION AND NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE COURT'S RULING. THE GRAVITY OF THE VIOLATION IS SERIOUS. THEY HAVE DONE SOME WORK.
BUT LITTLE TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION.
THE MAJORITY OF THE WORK THAT THEY WERE CITED FOR STILL NEEDS TO BE DONE, AND THIS MATTER HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE ITS INITIATION. FROM JULY 10, 2019.
SO I WILL GRANT, AGAIN, I WILL IMPOSE THE LIEN.
>> DO THEY HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL THAT?
>> THEY WOULD HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
IF THEY PAY IT, YES. ONCE THEY BRING IT UP TO COMPLIANCE, THEY CAN PAY OFF THE LIEN, AND WE WOULD ISSUE A
RELEASE OF LIEN ON IT. >> ANYTHING FURTHER?
FOR CASES REQUIRING A HEARING FOR STATE STATUTE 162.12, A NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE VIOLATORS CERTIFIED MAIL.
IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED SIGNED, IT IS PLACED IN THE FILE. IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED OR UNCLAIMED, AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING WITH THE NOTICE OF HEARING ENCLOSED IS SENT TO THE VIOLATOR E.G. U.S.
MAIL. TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD IN CITY HALL.
A NOTICE OF HEARING IS ALSO POSTED AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.
IF THE GREEN CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING, THE POSTING IS COMPLETED IN THE SAME MANNER AS IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED. FOR CASES NOT MANDATED BY STATE STATUTE, MAILING A NOTICE OF HEARING ARE HANDLED IN THE SAME
MANNER STATED PRIOR. >> ALL RIGHT.
ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.