Apr 17, 2024 Special Magistrate Hearing

[1. CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:08]

>>> THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING OF APRIL 17TH IS NOW CALLED TO ORDER. IF WE COULD PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]

[B. IDENTIFICATION OF CASES IN COMPLIANCE OR RESCHEDULED]

2802 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1, U.S. 1 MARK. 100 BLACK ORANGE AVENUE, NAGEL. 1229 AVENUE K, ALVAREZ ESTATES, LLC.

24-0045 , 1227 AVENUE K, ALVAREZ ESTATES, LLC. 24-0046 , 1225 AVENUE K, ALVAREZ IS DATES, LLC. 23-2752, 119 GARVIN NEW , LINDSAY. 23-2114, SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK, BYRD.

23-2643 , 709 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET , WILLES . 23-2915,

[A. 23-2610 CE 1110 N 29th St Off SP Pine Creek Village LP Isaac Saucedo]

>> MAY I ASK THE LADY NEXT TO YOU TO STATE HER NAME AND SPELL HER LAST NAME? AND WHAT IS YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY? YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY BY THE OWNER TO BE HERE AND REPRESENT THEM TODAY? THANK YOU.

>> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 23-19 SIX . THE CASE INITIATED ON SEPTEMBER 25TH OF 2023. THE OWNER IS SP PINE CREEK WITH AN ADDRESS OF 31899 SUITE 150. UNIT 150 IN SAN JUAN, CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA. AND THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 15 DAYS TO PRESSURE WASH AND PAINT ALL BUILDINGS THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY OR MOLD OR DETERIORATION HAS OCCURRED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A $150 FINE PER DAY. I DO HAVE SHOWED A PHOTOS THAT SHOW THE VIOLATION.

>> HAS THE RESPONDENT SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPHS? WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE PHOTOGRAPHS ? ARE THEY DATE STAMPED AS WELL? ARE THE DATE AND TIME STAMPS ACCURATE?

>> YES.

[00:05:07]

COMPOSITE EVIDENCE ONE. >> PHOTOS PRESENTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

>> ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NOT FOR ME, NO.

>> THANK YOU. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO TESTIFY?

>> WE WERE TRYING TO GET AN UNDERSTANDING ON WHAT THE ASK WAS, SO WE DID TALK TO MR. ISAAC IN REFERENCE TO WHAT WE NEED TO GET DONE, SO WE DO HAVE VENDORS IN PLACE TO GET DONE.

>> YES. >> I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS IN THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. THEY WILL BE GIVEN 15 DAYS TO PRESSURE WASH AND PAINT THE BUILDINGS WHERE MOLD OR YOU DETERIORATION HAS OCCURRED AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $150 A DAY BEING ASSESSED. THERE IS A 30

DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU.

[B. 24-531 CE 1601 Georgia Ave David De Florio Isaac Saucedo]

>> OUR NEXT CASE , 1601 GEORGIA AVENUE. DAVID DE

FLORIO . >> GOOD MORNING, HOW ARE YOU? YOU CAN HAVE A SEAT. THE CITY IS GOING TO PRESENT ITS CASE

FIRST. YOU CAN STAND OR SIT. >> THIS IS CASE 24-531, 1601 GEORGIA AVENUE. THIS CASE INITIATED ON THREE /25/24. THE FIRST INITIATED CASE WAS TAKING PLACE ON JUNE 13, 2022. THERE WAS A PRIOR HEARING DATE WHICH TOOK LACE ON OCTOBER 5 OF 2022. ON THAT DAY, THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOUND THAT THE VIOLATIONS EXISTED FOR PROTECTIVE TREATMENT, SECTIONS 24-19 , 21, SUBSECTION 4. 26-3 , STORAGE OF COMMODITIES, SECTION 24-19, SUBSECTION NUMBER ONE AND 5 FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE, AND SECTION 24/30 8C FOR VALIDITY OF CONTAINERS.

THE VIOLATIONS I PRESENTED TO YOU ARE THE SAME VIOLATIONS THAT I HAD JUST PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED. SO THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS THAT THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. PER STATE STATUTE 162.9, THE VIOLATIONS WERE PROTECTIVE TREATMENT , PARKING LOT OTHER THAN PAVEMENT, STORAGE OF COMMODITIES, ALL TYPES STORAGE RESPONSIBILITY ARE CONSIDERED REPEAT VIOLATIONS, AND AS SUCH, MAYBE ON THE DATE THE REPEAT VIOLATION IS FOUND BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, WHICH IS MICE ELF. THE DATE THE REPEATED VIOLATION WAS FIRST IDENTIFIED AS FEBRUARY 2003RD AS ESTABLISHED BY PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PROVIDED. THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MUST BE TAKEN TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS AND TO PRESSURE WASH AND PAINT THE HOME WERE CHIPPING, MOLDING, OR DETERIORATION HAS OCCURRED. REMOVE ALL COOLNESS , LADDERS, AND TO REMOVE ALL TRASH, RECYCLING CONTAINERS TO THE REAR OR SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE ARE NOT COLLECTION DAYS. TO REMOVE ALL MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS INSIDE OF THE TRAILERS AND TO PLEASE REFRAIN FROM PARKING VEHICLES ON THE GRASS. A FINE OF $500 PER DAY SHALL COMMENCE ON THE DATE FIRST IDENTIFIED, WHICH IS FEBRUARY 23RD, 2024, AND TO CONTINUE TO ACCRUE UNTIL THE PROPERTY IS IN COMPLIANCE. I DO HAVE PHOTOS

THAT SHOW THE VIOLATIONS. >> ARE THE PHOTOS DATE AND TIME STAMPED? ARE THEY ACCURATE AS TO THE VIOLATIONS YOU OBSERVED ON THE DATE AND TIME? HAVE YOU SHOWN THE PHOTOGRAPHS TO THE

REST PONDED? >> I HAVE.

>> CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1 .

[00:10:12]

>> SHOULD BE IN THE FIRST SECTION.

>> OKAY. I'M GOING TO ASK THE WITNESS TO PLEASE PLACE THE

PHOTOGRAPHS IN DATE ORDER. >> THEY SHOULD BE. THERE'S

TWO SECTIONS, SO ONE IS -- >> I SAW THERE WERE THREE DATES ON THERE. FEBRUARY, MARCH, AND MAYBE APRIL.

>> YOU HAVE FEBRUARY, MARCH, AND APRIL. THIS IS THE LAST UPDATED ONE, WHICH IS ALSO APRIL 15TH.

>> THANK YOU. AND IN ADDITION, YOU HAVE SUBMITTED THE PREVIOUS ORDER FINDING THE VIOLATION? ALL RIGHT. SO THE CITY WOULD MOVE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS , AND THE PREVIOUS

ORDER, INTO EXHIBIT 1. >> THESE WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1, PHOTOGRAPH AND PREVIOUS ORDER.

>> YOU HAVE ANYTHING FURTHER? >> NO.

>> SIR, WOULD YOU LIKE TO GO FORWARD?

>> YES. SOME OF THE PICTURES, ESPECIALLY THE EARLY ONES, ALL OF THAT HAS BEEN CORRECT. HE'S GOT A PICTURE OF THE BIG PILE OF TRASH, WHICH IS ACTUALLY OUT BY THE ROAD AND IS NOT THERE RIGHT NOW, BECAUSE THE GARBAGE HAS BEEN PICKED UP.

SO ALL THAT PICTURE, THAT PILE OF STUFF, THAT IS ALL GONE.

THESE PEOPLE ARE SCRAPPERS, AND IT'S CONSTANTLY COMING AND GOING. AND I TOLD HIM THAT IF THIS HAPPENS AGAIN, THAT I WOULD BE EVICTING HIM, AND I AM. I'M IN THE PROCESS OF THAT RIGHT THERE. HE HAS ALREADY RECEIVED AN EVICTION NOTICE FOR THESE VIOLATIONS. I HAVE PRESSURE CLEANED, I PAINTED, I TOOK CARE OF THE THINGS THAT I CAN TAKE CARE OF AT THIS POINT.

BUT HE HAS DONE A LOT AND GOTTEN RID OF A LOT OF THE TRASH THAT HAS BEEN TAKING PICTURES OF. AND HE'S BEEN CONSTANTLY GOING AND MOVING FORWARD WITH ALL OF THAT. THE PICTURES ARE BAD , BUT MOST OF EVERYTHING THAT HE HAD AROUND THE HOUSE IS GONE, AND HE'S WORKING ON IT EVEN TODAY. I STOPPED BY THERE TODAY BEFORE I CAME HERE. HE IS IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING RID OF ALL THAT STUFF. LIKE I SAID, I GOT THE EVICTION HERE, AND HE'S GOT UNTIL THE 19TH IS THE LAST DAY. I GIVE IT TO HIM ON THE DAY I RECEIVED THE NOTICE OF THE MAIL MYSELF. SO THAT'S ALL I CAN SAY AT THIS TIME.

ANYTHING ELSE THAT I COULD DO -- I WAS THERE FRIDAY TAKING CARE OF THE VIOLATIONS ON MY PART, AND I PRESSURE CLEANED FRIDAY AND PAINTED SATURDAY. SO THOSE PARTS TO THE HOUSE ARE TAKEN CARE OF. AS FAR AS JUST TRASH -- AND THE TRAILER, HE WROTE UP A TRAILER THAT HAD A LOT OF THAT WAS GOING TO THE DUMP. THE TRAILER IS EMPTY, AND THAT'S WHAT HE'S BEEN DOING. REMOVING IT THAT WAY, ALONG WITH THE TRASH TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. AND I TOLD HIM THIS MORNING THAT HE NEEDS TO BE OUT BY THE END OF THE MONTH. AND HE DID RENT A STORAGE UNIT SO THAT HE CAN REMOVE ALL THE THINGS OUT OF

THE HOUSE AND BE GONE. >> IS THE CITY AWARE? HAVE YOU SEEN THE CONDITION? RECENTLY?

>> I HAVE. BUT THE SAME THING HAPPENED LAST TIME. THEY COMPLIED AND THEY FELL OUT OF COMPLIANCE .

>> WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AN EVICTION AT THIS POINT, BECAUSE I AM GOING THROUGH WITH IT, AND HE IS LEAVING. AND THE ENTIRE PROPERTY WILL BE CLEANED UP.

>> ARE THEY CURRENTLY IN COMPLIANCE, ISAAC?

>> AS OF MONDAY WHEN I WENT OUT THERE, THERE WAS STILL SOME WORK THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE. I WOULDN'T SAY THEY ARE FULLY IN COMPLIANCE. HAS IT CHANGED A LOT FROM WHEN THE CASE WAS

[00:15:02]

COMPLIANCE JUST YET. >> MR. DE FLORIO, WAS THIS THE SAME TENANT THAT OCCUPIED IN 2022?

>> YES. I'VE BEEN WARNING HIM ALL THIS TIME THAT IF I GOT ANOTHER LETTER FROM THE CITY, I WOULD BE EVICTING HIM. I TOLD HIM AND TOLD HIM AND TOLD HIM, AND I'M OF COURSE GOING THROUGH WITH MY WORD . THIS WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN.

>> DO YOU HAVE ANY DOCUMENTS YOU'D LIKE TO PLACE?

>> THE ONLY THING I HAVE IS EVICTION, AND HE WROTE UP FOR OPEN WINDOWS WHICH HAVE BEEN REPLACED.

>> WHAT YOU MEAN THE EVICTION? CAN I SEE THAT?

>> THE EVICTION THAT I GAVE TO HIM.

>> THE EVICTION NOTICE. >> LET'S SEE. NOTICE FROM LANDLORD TO TENANT, TERMINATION OF TENANT THE HAD DELIVERED ON APRIL 3, 2024.

>> YES, MA'AM. THAT IS MY ONLY COPY. THAT'S THE ORIGINAL.

YOU NEED A COPY? >> I HAVE ALREADY PLACED INTO

EVIDENCE WHAT IT SAYS. >> OKAY.

>> WHAT IT IS, AND THE DATE THAT IT WAS SERVED.

>> OKAY. >> CAN I ASK -- WHEN YOU SAID HE IS NOT QUITE IN COMPLIANCE, WHAT IS REMAINING?

>> WELL, BASED ON THE PHOTOS THAT I HAVE SUBMITTED, THERE ARE STILL SOME OUT WORDS. THERE ARE STILL VEHICLES PARKED ALL OVER THE PLACE. THEY STILL HAVE SOME CLEANING, PRESSURE WASHING, MAYBE SOME PAINTING. IT'S A PRETTY BIG PARCEL, SO THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT BUILDINGS IN ONE PARCEL. I MEAN, THERE IS TRASH, THERE IS -- SOME OF THE STUFF THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO GET RID OF, AS YOU CAN SEE IN THIS PHOTO, JUST NOT PROPERLY DISPOSED, EITHER. THERE'S TIRES , NOT OPERABLE VEHICLES ON THE PROPERTY, SO IT IS --

>> NOT ANYMORE. THE ONE IN THE BACK THAT WAS UNLICENSED IS GONE. HE'S GOT A TRAILER HOOKED UP TO THAT ONE AND HE'S USED IT TO GET RID OF ALL THE STUFF IN THE BACKYARD. SO IT IS BEING TAKEN CARE OF, PROBABLY AT LEAST BEAK. BUT THE BICYCLES THAT YOU TOOK A PICTURE OF, HE --

>> USUALLY, KIDS TOYS WE DON'T REALLY LOOK AT. BUT I DO LIKE TO JUST TAKE PHOTOS OF EVERYTHING.

>> THE BOAT THERE IN THE FRONT HAS A FOR SALE SIGN. THERE'S ANOTHER VEHICLE IN THE FRONT YARD WITH A FOR SALE SIGN.

HE'S WORKING AS QUICKLY AS HE CAN , BUT THIS IS WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW, UNFORTUNATELY. LIKE I SAID, THE ONLY THING THAT I CAN DO AT THIS POINT -- YOU SEE THE STUFF ON THE FRONT PORCH. I COULDN'T PRESSURE CLEAN ALL THAT WITH HIS THINGS IN THE WAY. BUT AS SOON AS HE GETS EVERYTHING OUT OF THE WAY, I WILL BE TAKING CARE OF THAT QUICKLY. I TOLD HIM TO BE GONE BY THE END OF THE MONTH. AT THIS POINT, I JUST NEED A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME. ONCE HE'S GONE, EVERYTHING WILL BE

TAKEN CARE OF. >> MR. DE FLORIO, WHEN DID YOU RISK THE NOTICE OF THIS? WHEN DID YOU RECEIVE NOTICE OF THE

REVIEW VIOLATION? >> THE ORIGINAL?

>> THE REPEAT VIOLATION. >> FEBRUARY 3RD, WHEN I GAVE

HIM THE EVICTION NOTICE. >> YOU DIDN'T RECEIVE NOTICE

UNTIL APRIL 3RD? >> HOW WAS NOTICE DELIVERED?

>> IT WAS ACTUALLY POSTED -- IT WAS POSTED ON -- I'M SORRY, THE SECOND IS WHEN I RECEIVED IN THE MAIL, AND I WENT THE FOLLOWING DAY AND GAVE HIM THE EVICTION.

>> HE SIGNED ON IT ON 4/2, WE POSTED ON 4/5.

>> I HAD COMMUNICATION WHEN I FIRST INITIALLY WENT OUT THERE WITH THE TENANT, SO THEY WERE AWARE. I ACTUALLY SPOKE TO THEM, SO THEY KNOW WHO I AM. I'VE BEEN OUT THERE SEVERAL TIMES. I'M NOT SURE IF THEY PASSED ON THE MESSAGE OR NOT.

BUT THEY HAD COMMUNICATION -- WHEN I FIRST HAD CONTACT, I

[00:20:02]

FEBRUARY. >> I DIDN'T KNOW YOU HAD BEEN THERE UNTIL I RECEIVED NOTICE IN THE MAIL WITH WHAT I DID.

>> OKAY. ANYTHING FURTHER? >> IS THE CITY REQUESTING THE FINE WITHOUT GIVING ANY MORE TIME , STARTING FEBRUARY 23RD? VIOLATIONS DOES ALLOW YOU TO INITIATE THE FINE ON THE DAY THAT WE FIND THE REPEAT VIOLATION OCCURRED, AND THAT WAS ON FEBRUARY 23RD OF THIS YEAR. OF COURSE, IT'S UP TO YOU. THAT IS WHAT THE STATUTE DOES ALLOW.

>> JUST BASE ON WHAT HE'S TESTIFIED TO IS THAT HE'S REALLY HAD A COUPLE OF WEEKS SINCE HE WAS NOTICED WITH THE

REPEAT VIOLATION . >> WHAT WAS THE ORIGINAL LETTER , THE FIRST LETTER THAT WAS SENT?

>> THE FIRST LETTER FROM THE PREVIOUS CASE -- FROM THIS CASE . IT IS DATED FOR MARCH 25TH OF 2020.

>> THAT WAS SENT REGULAR U.S. POSTAL TO THE OWNER?

>> IT WAS SENT TO MR. DAVID DE FLORIO AND THE TENANT. MARCH

25TH OF 2024. >> I AM THE PROPERTY OWNER, BUT THERE'S NOTHING I CAN DO AS FAR AS TO GET RID OF HIS THINGS. SO I AM BEING PERHAPS PENALIZED BY SOMETHING -- ALL I COULD DO IS RESPOND BY AN EVICTION AND GET RID OF HIM.

SO I'M ASKING FOR JUST A FEW MORE -- ANOTHER WEEK OR TWO ONCE THEY ARE GONE AND I CAN COMPLETELY TAKE CARE OF THE PROPERTY WITHOUT BEING PENALIZED MYSELF. IT'S NOT ME THAT DID THIS. MAYBE I SHOULD HAVE EVICTED HIM SOONER, BUT THIS IS WHERE WE ARE, AND I AM AT THE LAST STRAW HERE MYSELF.

YOU CHECK ON THIS PROPERTY? >> LIKE I SAID, I HAVE BEEN WARNING HIM ALL ALONG. I CHECK ON IT, I SEE IT, I DRIVE BY BECAUSE I USE GEORGE AVENUE A LOT JUST TO DRIVE DOWN THE

ROAD. >> BETWEEN OCTOBER OF 2022, THE FIRE HEARING DATE, AND FEBRUARY 23RD, WHEN ISAAC NOTED THESE REPEAT VIOLATIONS, YOU DRIVE PAST THE PROPERTY EVERY

DAY? >> NOT EVERY DAY. NO, MA'AM.

ONCE OR TWICE A MONTH, MAYBE.

>> SO YOU HAVE BEEN AWARE OF WHAT IS GOING ON ON THE PROPERTY? AND THEN YOU BEEN PREVIOUSLY CITED AND YOU BEEN WARNING YOUR TENANT, BUT YOU HAVEN'T EVICTED HIM UNTIL

APRIL 3RD? >> BECAUSE OF WHAT I TOLD HIM, IF I GOT ANOTHER LETTER LETTER FROM YOU -- YES, MA'AM.

THAT'S ALL I CAN SAY. >> IS HE UNDER A LEASE OR

ANYTHING ? >> NO, THEY'RE REALLY GOOD WORKING PEOPLE, AND I HAVE A HEART FOR PEOPLE THAT WORK THAT HARD. THEY ARE SCRAPPERS. IT COMES AND IT GOES. THAT'S HOW HE MAKES HIS MONEY AND HOW THEY MAKE THEIR LIVING. AND TO EVICT THEM WHILE HE'S WORKING -- I GET IT. I KNOW THAT WAS A MESS, AND I HAVE BEEN WARNING HIM AND WARNING HIM. LIKE I SAID, THAT'S THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMELS BACK, WAS TO GET THIS LETTER. IT WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN.

>> THANK YOU. >> AND HE IS TO BE OUT APRIL

30TH? >> HIS LAST DAY IS THE 19TH.

BECAUSE HE'S GOT STILL THINGS TO REMOVE .

>> THE 19TH OF APRIL? >> YES, MA'AM.

>> WE DIDN'T KEEP A COPY OF THAT LETTER. COULD YOU PERHAPS READ IT? WHAT WAS THE DATE ON THE NOTICE OF EVICTION?

>> THE DAY I HANDED IT TO HIM WAS APRIL 3RD. IN THE LAST -- IT SAID ON THE 1600 GEORGIA AVENUE ADDRESS, NOW OCCUPIED BY YOU WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE. I GAVE HIM A 15 DAY NOTICE. ON OR BEFORE THE 19TH OF APRIL.

>> SO HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE OUT IN TWO DAYS, FRIDAY?

>> HE SHOULD BE OUT IN TWO DAYS. AT THAT POINT, THE ONLY THING AFTER THAT IS I'D HAVE TO GO TO THE COURTHOUSE AND GO FILE IT THAT WAY, AND THE SHERIFF WOULD HAVE TO SERVE HIM. BUT HE WILL BE OUT. AND I'VE HAVE TO GO THAT ROUTE,

COURSE, I WILL. >> I AM INCLINED TO GIVE HIM

[00:25:03]

UNTIL THE END OF APRIL. >> THANK YOU.

>> IF HE IS NOT OUT AND YOU HAVE NOT COMPLETED -- BEING IN COMPLETE COMPLIANCE BY THEN, THEN YOU WOULD BE IN VIOLATION AND THE FINE OF $500 A DAY WOULD COMMENCE AS OF APRIL 30TH. I GUESS AS OF MAY 1ST.

>> IS THAT YOUR RULING? >> OKAY. TO CLARIFY, YOU FIND THE REPEAT VIOLATION. FINE TO COMMENCE APRIL 30TH IF IT IS

NOT CORRECTED. >> IF IT'S NOT CORRECTED BY THEN. BECAUSE HE SAYING IT WILL BE.

>> 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. >> CORRECT.

>> THANK YOU.

[E. 24-140 CE 209 Gardenia Avenue Lauderdale Homes LLC Heather Debevec]

>> GOOD MORNING. WOULD YOU PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF FOR

THE RECORD? >> SIR, COULD YOU PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF FOR THE RECORD?

>> MY NAME IS FRED. I AM THE REALTY AGENT AND OWNER OF THE

PROPERTY. >> WHAT IS YOUR LAST NAME PLEASE? AND YOU ARE THE REAL ESTATE AGENT FOR -- 209 GARDENIA AVENUE. AND THE OWNER OF 209 GARDENIA AVENUE IS

LAUDERDALE HOMES, LLC? >> YES. TWO REPRESENT THEM IN

TODAY'S HEARING? THANK YOU. >> GOOD MORNING. THIS IS CASE NUMBER 24-140, 209 GARDENIA AVENUE , LAUDERDALE HOMES, LLC.

THE FIRST HEARING DATE WAS NOVEMBER 15TH OF 2023. THE REVEAL AND DETERMINATION WAS FOUND ON NOVEMBER 15TH, 2023, AT SECTION 30-28, SUBSECTION 3. SECTION 2421 SUBSECTIONS ONE AND FIVE, NUISANCES AN OBJECT OF OUTSIDE STORAGE. SECTION 123 SUBSECTION 12 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. THE VIOLATIONS SECTION , AS I JUST MENTIONED, THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS THAT THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. PER STATUTE 162.09, THE VIOLATIONS OF SUBSECTION C, RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTAINERS, 2420, SUBSECTIONS ONE AND FIVE, NUISANCES AN OBJECT OUTSIDE GEORGE. SECTION 123 SUBSECTION 12, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ARE CONSIDERED REPEAT VIOLATIONS. AND AS SUCH, MAYBE FIND BEGINNING ON THE DAY THE REPEAT VIOLATION IS FOUND TO BE INCURRED BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. THE DATE THEY WERE FIRST IDENTIFIED WAS JANUARY 26TH AS ESTABLISHED BY PHOTO EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PROVIDED. THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MUST BE TAKEN . MOVE ALL TRASH RECYCLE TO THE SIDE OR REAR STRUCTURE ON NON-COLLECTION DAYS. REMOVE ALL USE ITEMS IN THE ABOVE-MENTIONED ORDINANCE AND STORE OUT OF PUBLIC VIEW A GARAGE OR SHED. A FINE OF $500 SHOULD COMMENCE ON THE DATE FIRST IDENTIFIED JANUARY 26TH OF THIS YEAR AND CONTINUE TO ACCRUEUNTIL THE PROPERTY IS BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE. I DO HAVE PHOTOS WHICH TO SUBMIT, ALONG WITH A COPY OF THE PREVIOUS ORDER, AND I HAVE NOT HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE THOSE WITH MR. -- I'M SORRY.

>> AND I SHARE THOSE? >> THANK YOU.

>> DID YOU TESTIFY THAT THESE PHOTOS ARE DATE AND TIME STAMP AND THEY ACCURATELY REFLECT THE DAYS YOU WITNESSED THE

VIOLATIONS? >> CORRECT.

>> THERE IS ALSO A COPY OF THE PREVIOUS ORDER INCLUDED WITH THE FIRST SET OF PHOTOS.

[00:30:18]

YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. THE CITY WOULD MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS AND THE ORDER FROM NOVEMBER 16TH, 2023 , INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1. WE ARE ON

5E. >> PHOTOS AND LETTERS ENTERED WILL BE SUBMITTED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT NUMBER ONE.

DOES THE CITY HAVE ANYTHING? >> I DO, MA'AM. MS. CALHOUN DID REACH OUT TO ME, AS SHE COULD NOT BE HERE DUE TO HER NEW JOB. SHE STATED THAT SHE IS IN THE PROCESS OF MOVING

OUT. >> NO SPECIFIC DATE?

>> THAT WAS THE EXTENT OF THE CONVERSATION, MA'AM.

>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO PRESENT? >> SHE SAID SHE'S IN THE PROCESS OF MOVING OUT. I TALKED TO HER THE DAY BEFORE YESTERDAY, AND THEN SHE CAME TO THE AGREEMENT THAT SHE WOULD BE MOVING OUT BY THE END OF THIS MONTH. AND THE LANDLORD IS -- HE WILL TAKE CARE OF THE GRASS, PAINT THE HOUSE, MAKE IT LOOK REALLY NICE. TAKE CARE OF ALL THE TRASH, AND CUT THE GRASS. AND HE WILL GET IT READY TO SELL. WE JUST NEED SOME TIME FOR THE TENANT TO MOVE OUT, AND FOR US TO START WORKING ON THE HOUSE. MAYBE IF WE COULD GET 90 TO 60 DAYS , THAT WILL HELP US A LOT TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE.

>> IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE LEASE PREVENTING YOU FROM CUTTING THE GRASS AND IMPROVING THE EXTERIOR WHILE THE TENANT

IS STILL THERE? >> THAT'S THE TENANT

RESPONSIBILITY. >> IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE LEASE VENTING THE LANDLORD? I UNDERSTAND WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY IT IS, BUT IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE LEASE PREVENTING THE LANDLORD FROM CLEANING UP THIS PROPERTY WHILE THE TENANT IS

STILL THERE? >> THE LANDLORD DOESN'T WANT TO THROW AWAY ANYTHING FROM THE TENANT. IF WE HAVE TO CUT THE GRASS TOMORROW, FOR TODAY, WE WILL SEND SOMEBODY TO CUT IT. BUT HE JUST DOESN'T WANT TO THROW AWAY BELONGINGS FROM THE TENANT. HE DOESN'T WANT TO GET IN TROUBLE FOR THAT.

>> WELL, NOT ASKING THROW AWAY. ARE WE ASKING TO MOVE THE OUTSIDE STORAGE OUT OF -- WHAT WERE THE ORIGINAL VIOLATIONS?

STORAGE OUT OF PUBLIC VIEW. >> OKAY.

>> AND CLEAN UP THE LANDSCAPING, CORRECT?

>> AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE PHOTO, THAT'S US CLEANING UP ALONG THAT FENCE LINE. BECAUSE THESE PHOTOS ARE FROM APRIL 15TH.

>> THE LANDLORD HAS THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE PROPERTY AND DO THOSE THINGS. IS THAT YOUR UNDERSTANDING UNDER THE LEASE? AND HE DOESN'T WANT TO DO IT?

>> YOU WILL BE OKAY DOING IT. HE'S JUST A TENANT THAT DOESN'T REALLY TAKE CARE OF THE PROPERTY. IT'S REALLY HARD. AND THAT'S WHY HE'S ASKING SOME TIME THAT BY THE TIME HE LEAVES HE CAN ACTUALLY DO EVERYTHING AND TAKE CARE OF

THE PROPERTY. >> IS THE PROPERTY BEHIND A LOCKED FENCE, PREVENTING HIM FROM ACCESSING THE YARD AND EXTERIOR AND THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS A

VIOLATION? >> THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE?

>> NOT AT THIS TIME, MA'AM. >> I AM NOT INCLINED TO ALLOW 60 OR 90 DAYS. I THINK BASED ON THE QUESTIONS BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, THE LANDLORD HAS FULL ACCESS TO AT LEAST DO THE

[00:35:06]

COMPLIANCE. >> WILL YOU GIVE US SOMETIMES TO MAYBE TAKE CARE OF THIS WEEK , SEND SOMEBODY --

>> BEFORE THE FINE WOULD START? YOU'VE HAD THIS TIME TO DO

IT. THEY HAVE NOT DONE IT. >> THEY ARE JUST HOPING TO WORK BETTER IN THE HOUSE BEFORE THE TENANT -- RIGHT AFTER THE TENANTS MOVE OUT. BUT IF WE HAVE TO DO IT THIS WEEK, WE WILL SEND SOMEBODY. WE JUST DON'T WANT TO GET A FINE.

COULD YOU PLEASE HELP US WITH THAT?

>> IS A CITY OBJECT TO HIM NOT BEING FIND UNTIL SEVEN DAYS?

>> THAT CHOICE IS UP TO YOU, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.

>> I FIND IT SOMEWHAT OF -- CERTAINLY, SOME OF IT COULD

HAVE BEEN DONE. >> YOUR DISCRETION, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. I BELIEVE THE ORDER THAT WAS ENTERED IN THE PREVIOUS CASE SPECIFICALLY SAYS THAT THE VERY LAST LINE THAT A REPEAT VIOLATION WILL BE A CHARGE OF $500 A DAY INCURRED FOR A REPEAT VIOLATION. THE ORIGINAL VIOLATION IS IN 2023.

THE REPEAT VIOLATION WAS NOTED EIGHT WEEKS LATER.

>> YOU DO HAVE DISCRETION, YOUR HONOR.

>> I CAME ALL THE WAY FROM FORT LAUDERDALE. I KNOW THIS MATTER IS IMPORTANT, AND WE ARE WILLING TO DO WHAT IS

NECESSARY. >> THE CITY IS SAYING YOU'VE HAD THE OPTION TO DO SOMETHING SINCE NOVEMBER AND NOTHING WAS

DONE. >> IF YOU COULD GIVE US JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME, I WOULD APPRECIATE THAT TAKE CARE OF

IT. >> I DON'T -- I'M SORRY, I DON'T SEE THAT THERE WAS A REASON TO DELAY THIS LONG, SO I FIND THAT THE FINE WOULD COMMENCE WHEN IT COMMENCED.

CERTAINLY, IF YOU FIX IT IN THE NEXT SEVEN DAYS, THE FINE WILLS TOP. SO THAT WOULD BE MY ORDER. THE $500 FINE SHOULD COMMENCE ON THE DAY IDENTIFIED AS JANUARY 26, 2024, AND CONTINUE UNTIL THE PROPERTY IS BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE. YOU DO HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.

[F. 24-141 CE 209 Gardenia Avenue LAUDERDALE HOMES LLC Heather Debevec]

>> THE SECOND ONE WITH THE SAME ADDRESS.

>> WE HAVE OUR NEXT CASE, WHICH IS CAPITAL FIVE F. FOR THE

SAME CASE NUMBER. >> THANK YOU.

>> SIR, THIS IS THE SAME ADDRESS.

CASE NUMBER 24/101, LAUDERDALE HOMES, LLC. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED ON JANUARY 26 OF THIS YEAR. IT WAS FOR PROTECTIVE TREATMENT. SECTION 2419, 2421, SUBSECTION OR, PARKING ON OTHER THAN PAVEMENT. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 20 DAYS TO PRESSURE WASH THE HOME AND TRIM, REFRAIN FROM PARKING ON OTHER THAN PAVEMENT, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINAL $250 A DAY BEING ASSESSED . I DO HAVE PHOTOS WITH HER DATE AND TIME STAMPED WITH WHICH TO SUBMIT, AND HE HAS NOT REVIEWED THEM AS OF YET.

>> DID YOU LET HIM REVIEW THE PHOTOGRAPHS?

[00:40:34]

AS CITIES COMPOSITE TIBBETT NUMBER 1.

>> TO DISTINGUISH THIS CASE FROM THE PREVIOUS MATTER, THE VIOLATIONS ARE PROTECTIVE REATMENT AND PARKING ON OTHER THAN PAVEMENT.

TENANT TO MOVE OUT SO WE CAN TAKE CARE OF THIS. BUT THAT IS -- WE LET THE TENANT KNOW NOT TO PARK OVER THERE, AND THAT IS THE BEST WE CAN DO. AND I THINK SHE SAID THAT SHE WON'T -- SHE MOVED TO THE CAR.

>> YOUR HONOR, WHEN I SPOKE WITH MS. CALHOUN YESTERDAY, SHE DID SAY SHE IS IN THE PROCESS OF MOVING, WHICH IS PART OF WHY SHE WAS UTILIZING PARKING IN THE YARD TO LOAD AND UNLOAD.

AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE PHOTO, THAT'S HOW IT'S BEEN EVERY SO

OFTEN WHEN I COME BACK. >> I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, BUT YOU HAVE 20 DAYS TO COMPLY, SINCE IT'S NOT LIKE THE PREVIOUS CASE. YOU HAVE 20 DAYS TO COMPLY BEFORE ANY FINE WOULD BEGIN. SO FAILURE TO COMPLY WOULD RESULT IN A $250 FINE A DAY BEING ASSESSED. THAT WOULD BE 20 DAYS. AND YOU DO HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS.

>> THANK YOU. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. WE WILL

[G. 24-20 CE 120 Desota Street Donna M Becker, Juanita Spera, Teresa Van Valkenburgh Heather Debevec]

TAKE CARE OF IT. >> THANK YOU. OUR NEXT CASE IS 5G, 120 DE SOTO STREET , DONNA BECKER, ONE HE TESTS .

TERESA VAN VALKENBURGH. >> WOULD YOU PLEASE IDENTIFY

YOURSELF? >> DONNA MARIA BECKER .

>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, THIS IS 120 DE SOTO STREET, OWNED BY DONNA BECKER, AND TERESA VAN VALKENBURGH. THIS WAS INITIATED THIS YEAR FOR SECTION 123 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. I PMC ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, 304.1, EXTERIOR STRUCTURE GENERAL, PROTECTIVE TREATMENT. THE CITY REQUESTED OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THAT THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 20 DAYS TO TRIM BUSHES TO GIVE A NEAT APPEARANCE, REPLACE SCREENS MISSING ON THE GARAGE DOOR. REPLACE THE ROTTING WOOD ON THE WEST FACING WALL, PAINT THE TRIM AROUND THE HOME, AND EAST WALL WERE PEELING AND DISCOLORATION HAS OCCURRED. YOUR TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED. I DO HAVE PHOTOS WITH WHICH TO SUBMIT.

THEY ARE DATE AND TIME STAMPED. I ALSO MET WITH MISS BECKER AT THE PROPERTY, I BELIEVE IT WAS LAST WEEK, TO GO OVER THE VIOLATIONS IN PERSON AS WELL.

>> TO THE DATE AND TIME STAMPS ON THESE PHOTOS ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS THAT YOU WITNESSED?

>> YES. >> THE CITY MOVES THESE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EVIDENCE 1.

>> PHOTOGRAPHS SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO --

>> KNOW. MY SISTER WAS GOING TO MOVE TO THIS HOUSE, BUT SHE HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO COME DOWN HERE. I ACTUALLY HAVE A DATE MEANT OF KIND OF WHAT HAS OCCURRED. I DID NOT KNOW THAT IT LOOKED LIKE THIS. SO WHEN I GOT UP THERE, OBVIOUSLY, I WASN'T TOO HAPPY WITH THAT. I MET WITH HEATHER TO MAKE SURE I

[00:45:03]

LANDSCAPING, AT LEAST SOMEBODY WAS OVER THERE YESTERDAY TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE, AND MY SISTER HAS BEEN CONTACTING -- AND I HAVE AS WELL -- SOMEBODY TO COME IN AND ADDRESS THE ISSUES WITH THIS LECTURE TO REPLACE THE ROTTING WOOD AND PAINTING AS REQUESTED. AND WE DID POST THE HOUSE FOR SALE, AND THE PROPERTY. SHE HAD PLANNED ON COMING DOWN AND DECIDED SHE IS NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT. AND SO WE ARE POSTING AND HOPE TO SELL WITHIN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS, BECAUSE WE ARE GETTING A LOT OF RESPONSES.

>> YOU NEED MORE THAN 20 DAYS?

>> HERE, I DID ASK FOR 30, BECAUSE SOMETIMES OUR SCHEDULE DOESN'T ALLOW FOR THAT. IF WE COULD HAVE 30, THAT WOULD BE

GREAT. >> I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION DOES EXIST, BUT YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE. IF NOT, THEN THE FINE WOULD BEGIN AT $250 A DAY. AND THERE IS A RIGHT TO APPEAL.

>> THANK YOU. >> DO YOU WANT THIS? I GAVE A

COPY TO HEATHER. >> NOT NECESSARY, UNLESS YOU WOULD LIKE IT TO BE PART OF THE RECORD.

>> KNOW. IT WAS JUST AN EXPLANATION OF WHAT WAS GOING

ON WITH THE PROPERTY. >> WE WILL PUT IT INTO EVIDENCE AS RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT NUMBER 1. SURE. WE WILL HAND IT OUT.

THANKS.

LETTER WRITTEN BY DONNA BECKER ON APRIL 17, 2024.

>> IT IS FROM ME, BUT EXPLAINS THE ISSUE.

>> OKAY. THE LETTER WILL BE ENTERED AS RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT

1. >> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU.

[F. 23-2147 PK Gulfstream Beach Access Samantha Cox Michael Rabenecker]

>> OUR NEXT CASE WILL BE 4 F, 23-2147. GULF STREAM BEACH

ACCESS, SAMANTHA COX. >> I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND SWEAR YOU IN. PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH?

>> YES. >> THANK YOU.

>> GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 23-2147 , A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT GULF STREAM BEACH ACCESS . THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 22ND, 2023. THIS IS A REGULAR PARKING CITATION. THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE CAME BACK IS A SAMANTHA COX. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 200 92, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE . PARKING ON THE CITY RIGHT AWAY. THE CITY IS ASKING FOR A $50 FIND TO BE ASSESSED, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND AN $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL OF $78. THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED -- THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.

>> HAS THE RESPONDENT HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE

PHOTOGRAPHS? >> I RECEIVED RINGS IN THE MAIL. THEY WERE KIND OF BLACK AND WHITE, BUT --

>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE PHOTOGRAPHS BEFORE WE PLACE THEM INTO EVIDENCE? THANK YOU.

>> HE MOVES THESE PHOTOS INTO EVIDENCE AS TO THESE COMPOSITE

EXHIBIT 1. >> PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

[00:50:04]

>> ANYTHING ELSE? >> NO, MA'AM.

>> THANK YOU. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO STATE

ANYTHING HERE? >> YES. MY HUSBAND AND I LIVE IN OKEECHOBEE AND WE WERE LOOKING FOR A GOOD SPOT TO FISH KIND OF AWAY FROM PEOPLE, NOT TOO CLOSE TO MAJOR BEACHES WHERE PEOPLE ARE TAKING THEIR KIDS AND WHATNOT SO WE CAN FISH. STAY POLITE AND AWAY FROM FAMILIES. AND THIS SPOT ONLY HAS FOUR REGULAR SPOTS, ONE HANDICAPPED SPOT. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SPOT WAS FULL. THERE WAS SOMEBODY BEHIND US IT ALSO PARKED IN THE SAME POT. WE ARE NOT IN THE YELLOW SHADED AREA, AND MY HUSBAND HAS A VIDEO TAKEN OF THE SAME DAY, AND I JUST DON'T THINK THAT WE ARE PARKED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

THERE ARE NO PARKING SIGNS THERE AS WELL.

>> HOW WOULD SOMEONE KNOW THAT THAT IS RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THAT

THEY ARE NOT TO PARK THERE? >> THERE WOULD BE WHITE LINES.

IS THERE A PHOTO -- OF THE OTHER SIDE?

>> I DO HAVE A VIDEO AND A COUPLE OF THINGS I WOULD LIKE

TO SHOW AS WELL. >> YOUR HONOR, I BELIEVE SHE TESTIFIED THAT THERE WAS FOUR SPACES AND ONE OF THEM WAS HANDICAPPED, SO SHE KNEW THERE WERE FOUR SPACES SHE WAS ALLOWED TO PARK IN, AND SHE CHOSE TO PARK IN THIS UNMARKED

AREA. >> THERE IS NO WHITE LINES TO

DESIGNATE FOR PARKING. >> LIKE I SAID, IT WAS VERY FULL THAT DAY. THE ONLY TIME YOU CAN GET A WORK AWAY FROM WORK SOMETIMES. IF YOU LOOK AT GOOGLE EARTH, WERE LOOKING AT THE WATER AND WHERE HE WANTS TO FISH AS WELL. IT'S A DARK SHADED AREA AT THAT GULF STREAM SPOT WHERE THE FISH SWIM INTO

THERE. >> I FIND THAT, UNFORTUNATELY, AS IT WAS POINTED OUT, YOU BASICALLY KNEW THAT THAT WASN'T A PARKING SPACE, BUT YOU NEEDED PARKING.

>> THERE IS A YELLOW SHADED AREA RIGHT HERE THAT SHOWS YOU

YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED HARK THERE. >> I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS , BUT I WILL WAIVE THE ADMINISTRATION AND LATE FEE.

IT'S $50, PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS OR IT GETS TURNED OVER TO A COUNTY COURT. YOU DO HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO DO THAT. THANK YOU FOR COMING IN.

>> DID YOU SAY 20 DAYS TO PAY?

>> DID I SAY 20 DAYS? >> I DON'T THINK IS THAT ANY DAYS. HOW MANY DAYS THAT SHE HAVE TO PAY? I DON'T THINK I SAID HOW MANY DAYS YOU HAVE TO PAY.

>> SO WHAT IS DIFFICULT? >> A $50 FINE, 14 DAYS TO PAY.

>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> THANK YOU.

[A. 24-598 PK 100 Blk Melody Lane Ronald Benham Michael Rabenecker]

>> OUR NEXT ONE WILL BE FOR A , 100 BLOCK MELODY LANE,

RONALD BENHAM. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS IS 24-298, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 500 BLOCK F MALLEY LANE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON MARCH 1ST, 2024. THIS IS A PARKING CITATION TO BUTTE. THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE CAME BACK AS A RONALD BENHAM. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 169707 , A PARKING VIOLATION OF 35-A, ROAD CLOSED DUE TO A SPECIAL EVENT. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED FOR A TOTAL OF ASKED HE DOLLARS. THE CITY REQUEST IF THEY FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $60, AND WILL RESULT IN A CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT.

>> CITY MOVES THESE INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

[00:55:13]

>> NO, MA'AM. >> I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION OCCURRED, AND THAT THE FINE OF $60 BE ASSESSED, WHICH IS A $50 FINE PLUS AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE OF $10, AND THAT IT WILL BE PAID IN 14 DAYS, OR IT WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM, AND THERE IS A THIRTY-DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL.

>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 4B. 24-110

[B. 24-110 PK 500 Blk Pinewood Drive Ean Holdings, LLC Michael Rabenecker]

>> YOUR HONOR, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 500 BLOCK OF PINEWOOD DRIVE . THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JANUARY 7, 2024. THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE CAME BACK AS EAN HOLDINGS, LLC. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 19996, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE 34-31 L , PARKED ON THE CITY RIGHT AWAY. A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND AN $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL OF $78.

THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION OF THIS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED -- THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78, AND FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED

TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. >> CITY MOVES THESE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EVIDENCE 1.

>> SO PHOTOGRAPHS SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES

COMPOSITE EVIDENCE 1. >> I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FEE AND 14 DAYS WILL RESULT IN THE CASE BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. THERE IS A THIRTY-DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL.

>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 4 C, 500

[C. 24-111 PK 500 Blk Pinewood Drive Ean Holdings, LLC Michael Rabenecker]

>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS 24-111, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 500 BLOCK OF PINEWOOD DRIVE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JANUARY 7, 2024. THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE CAME BACK AS A EAN HOLDINGS, LLC. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 19997 , A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE 34-30 1L, PARKED ON THE CITY RIGHT AWAY. A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND AN $18 LATE FEE FOR A TOTAL OF $78. THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. THE PHOTOS PROVIDED ACCURATELY PRESENT THE VIOLATIONS AS I WITNESSED IT.

>> CITY MOVES THESE INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE

NUMBER ONE. >> PHOTOGRAPHS SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1. I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT HE FINE BE ASSESSED IN THE AMOUNT OF $70. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH FINE WITHIN 14 DAYS WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY SYSTEM, AND THERE IS A THIRTY-DAY RIGHT OF APPEAL.

>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> OUR NEXT TIME IS 4E, SOFT CAUSEWAY PARK. ROXANA BARON.

BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 23-2154 , PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SAL CAUSEWAY PARK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 23, 2023. THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE CAME BACK IS A

[01:00:04]

COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. >> THE CITY MOVES THESE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

>> PHOTOS PRESENTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.

I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE OF $78 TO BE PAID WITHIN 14 DAYS, OR WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. THERE IS A

[G. 23-2427 PK 100 Blk Melody Lane Shomarka O Keita Michael Rabenecker]

THIRTY-DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.

>> NEXT CASE IS 4G, 100 BLOCK MELODY LANE. SHOMARKA O KEITA

. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 23-2427, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF MELODY LANE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 11TH, 2023. THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE CAME BACK AS A SHOMARKA O. KEITA . THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 20236, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE 34-30 1D, PARKING BEYOND THE TWO HOUR TIME LIMIT. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND A LATE FEE OF $18 TOTAL $78. THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS OF ISOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78, AND FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM.

THEY ACTUALLY PORTRAY THE VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT.

>> CITY MOVES THESE EVIDENCE AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

>> PHOTOS WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE 1.

THE VIOLATOR BE A MAP ASSESSED ON THE MOUNT OF $78, AND IT IS TO BE PAID WITHIN 14 DAYS FOR THE CITATION WILL BE FORWARDED TO BE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. AND THERE IS A THIRTY-DAY RIGHT TO

APPEAL. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.

[H. 23-2426 PK 100 Blk Melody Lane Ian Edmonson Michael Rabenecker]

>> NEXT CASE IS 23-2426, 100 BLOCK MELODY LANE, IAN

EDMONDSON. >> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE 23-2426 A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF MELODY LANE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 11, 2023. THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE CAME BACK IS IN IAN EDMUND. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 2023 FIVE, PARKING BEYOND THE TWO HOUR POSTED TIME LIMIT. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AND ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED: THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. AND FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. .

>> THE CITY MOVES THESE AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

>> THEY WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1. I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY THE FINE

[01:05:01]

>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS FOR 100

[I. 23-2274 PK 100 Blk Melody Lane Justin Maguire Michael Rabenecker]

BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER 23-2274, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF MELODY LANE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON AUGUST 4, 2023. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A JUSTIN MAGUIRE. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 20218, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE 34-35 A, NO PARKING WITHOUT PERMISSION. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, A $10 ADMINISTRATION FEE, AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED: THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. AND FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. . I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE HER DATE AND TIME STAMPED AND ACCURATELY

. >> THE CITY MOVES THESE PHOTOS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.

CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.

WE FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE

[J. 23-2267 PK 100 Blk Melody Lane 2013 U-Haul Titling 1, LLC Michael Rabenecker]

>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> ARE NOW 100 BLOCK MELODY LANE, 2013, U-HAUL TILTING 1, LLC.

>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS TO 3-2267, PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF MELODY LANE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JULY 29, 2023. THE VIOLATOR OF THE CASE CAME BACK IS A 2013 U-HAUL TITLING 1, LLC. THE CITATION NUMBER IS 20200, A VIOLATION OF 34-30 1E, PARKING PROHIBITED. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AND ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, A LATE FEE OF $18, AND A TOTAL OF $78. IF THE CITY MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $70, AND FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. . I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT HER DATE AND TIME STAMPED AND THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE

VIOLATIONS AS I WITNESSED IT. >> CITY MOVES THESE INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.

>> PHOTOS WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE 1. I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78 TO BE PAID IN 14 DAYS OR THE CITATION WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. THERE

[K. 23-2706 PK 100 Blk Melody Lane Barbara Kostandinu Andonis Kostandinu Michael Rabenecker]

>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 4K , 100 BLOCK, MELODY LANE.

BEFORE YOU IS CASE 23-07 , A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT THE 100 BLOCK OF MELODY LANE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2023. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A BARBARA KOSTANDINU AND A ANDONIS KOSTANDINU. THE CITATION NUMBER IS 20505, A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE BEFORE-30 1E, LIMITED PARKING. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AND ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTS

[01:10:01]

>> THE CITY ACCEPTS THESE AS EXHIBIT 1.

>> PHOTOS WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

BASED ON THE PHOTOS AND THE TESTIMONY, I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS , AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY SAID AMOUNT IN 14 DAYS WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY

[L. 23-2795 PK Jaycee Park Travis Edwards Michael Rabenecker]

>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS 4L, 23-279 FIVE, JAYCEE PARK, TRAVIS EDWARDS.

BEFORE YOU IS CASE NUMBER TO 3-1795, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT JAYCEE PARK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2023. THE VIOLATOR IN THE CASE CAME BACK AS A TRAVIS EDWARDS. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 20510, PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE 34-30 1E, PARKING PROHIBITED. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AND ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, A LATE FEE OF $18, FOR A TOTAL OF $78. THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $70, AND FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME STAMPED AND THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT. .

PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE. AS CITIES COMPOSITE EVIDENCE 1.

>> PHOTOS WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.

BASED ON THE PHOTOS AND THE TESTIMONY, I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY SAID FINE WITHIN 14 DAYS WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY

[M. 23-2912 PK South Causeway Park AutoSport Motors LLC Michael Rabenecker]

>> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> NEXT CASE IS FOR 23-279 12.

>> THIS IS FOR M. >> OKAY.

>> YOUR HONOR, THE NEXT CASE BEFORE YOU IS CASE 23-29, A PARKING VIOLATION THAT OCCURRED AT SOUTH CAUSEWAY PARK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 9, 2023. THIS IS A REGULAR PARKING CITATION PRESENTATION. THE VIOLATOR CAME BACK AS AUTO SPORT MOTORS LLC. THE CITATION NUMBER WRITTEN IS 119 THE NINTH , A PARKING VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE 34-31, PARKING PROHIBITED. THE CITY IS ASKING THAT A $50 FINE BE ASSESSED, AND ADMINISTRATION FEE OF $10, AND A LATE FEE OF $18 FOR A TOTAL OF $78. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED: THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. AND FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. I HAVE PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THAT ARE DATE AND TIME STAMPED AND THEY ACCURATELY PORTRAY THE

VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT. >> CITY MOVES THESE PHOTOS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EVIDENCE 1.

>> PHOTOGRAPHS PRESENTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1. AND I FIND BASED ON THE TESTIMONY AND THE PHOTOS THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY THE FINE WITHIN 14 DAYS WILL RESULT IN THE CITATION BEING ISSUED OR FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM, AND THERE IS A THIRTY-DAY RIGHT TO

APPEAL. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.

>> THANK YOU. WE ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND JUMP TO VIOLATION CASES. OUR NEXT CASE IS 5C, 23-3114.

[01:15:02]

>> GOT CONTINUED. >> OKAY. THANK YOU.

[C. 23-3114 CE 1214 Avenue K Sandra Sfilio Manuel Fernandez Jr.]

>> NEXT CASE IS 5C, 23-3114, 1214 AVENUE K. SANDRA SFILIO.

>> GOOD MORNING. >> BEFORE YOU, I HAVE CASE TO 3-3114, 1214 AVENUE K. THE OWNER WAS SANDRA SFILIO. THE CASE WAS INITIATED DECEMBER 14, 2023. THIS IS A REGULAR CODE CASE. THEY WERE CITED FOR SECTIONS 24-19, 24-20, WHEN HE 4-21, SUBSECTIONS AMARAL ONE AND 5, NEW SINCE AS AN OBJECT/OUTSIDE STORAGE, 304.2, PROTECTIVE TREATMENT, IMPC 302.7, ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, SECTION 24-19, 24-20, 24-21 4 NEW SINCE AS AN OBJECT, PARKING ON OTHER THAN PAVEMENT. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED: THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 20 DAYS TO DO THE FOLLOWING -- TO REMOVE ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE, PRESSURE WASH AND PAINT WERE CHIPPING, MOLDING, OR DETERIORATION HAS OCCURRED. REMOVE OR REPAIR THE WHITE WOODEN FENCE, AND REFRAIN FROM PARKING ON THE GRASS AND CREATE A DESIGNATED PARKING AREA. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED. I HAVE PHOTOS THAT ARE DATE AND TIME STAMPED THAT ACCURATELY

PORTRAY WHAT I WITNESSED. >> WE MOVE THESE PHOTOS INTO EVIDENCE AS THESE COMPOSITE EVIDENCE 1.

>> PHOTOS WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

BASED ON THE TESTIMONY AND THE PHOTOGRAPHS SUBMITTED, I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION THIS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 20 DAYS TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING -- REMOVE ALL OUTSIDE STORAGE, PRESSURE WASHING PAINT WERE CHIPPING MOLDING OR DETERIORATION HAS OCCURRED, REMOVE OR REPAIR THE WHITE WOODEN FENCE, RESTRAIN OR REFRAIN FROM PARKING ON THE GRASS AND CREATING A DESIGNATED PARKING AREA.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $250 A DAY BEING ASSESSED. AND THERE IS A THIRTY-DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL.

[D. 24-151 STR 1703 Francis Court Shaphan Kirkpatrick Heather Debevec]

>> THANK YOU. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS CAPITAL FIVE D. 24-151, 1703 FRANCIS COURT, SIOBHAN KIRKPATRICK.

>> THE CASE NUMBER IS 24-151.

>> AND THE DOCKET NUMBER? >> 5D.

1703 FRANCIS COURT, OWNED BY SHAPHAN KIRKPATRICK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON JANUARY 26 OF THIS YEAR. SECTION 22-506 , STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED: THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE VIOLATOR BE NOTIFIED -- EXCUSE ME. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE VIOLATOR BE NOTIFIED IF A VIOLATION OF SECTION 22-50 SICK SUBSECTION I, PARKING 2, 4, 5, STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PARKING RESTRICTIONS OCCURS AGAIN ON ANY PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VIOLATOR PEPPER STATUTE 162.06 CAPITAL THREE ADDITIONAL TIME TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION WILL

[01:20:01]

DAY. >> I HAVE COPIES FOR THE

SHORT-TERM RENTAL. >> ALL RIGHT.

>> THE CITY WOULD MOVE THESE DOCUMENTS, PHOTOGRAPHS, OF THE SHORT-TERM RENTAL INTO EXHIBIT AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

WILL BE MARKED AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1 FOR THE CITY.

>> SO THE CITY IS ASKING FOR A REVIEW AND DETERMINATION THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS. IS THAT CORRECT?

>> YES, THANK YOU. IF IT REPEATS, THE $500 A DAY FINE.

THANK YOU. >> I FIND THAT THE VIOLATION OF SECTION 22-506 I , PARKING SUBSECTION 2, SUBSECTION 4, SUBSECTION 5, STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS -- THAT THE VIOLATION EXISTS , AND THE VIOLATOR IS ON NOTICE THAT A FINE CAN BE ASSESSED FROM THIS POINT ON A $500 A DAY, UP TO $500 A DAY. IF THERE ARE REPEAT VIOLATIONS.

[H. 24-449 CE 2501 Sunrise Boulevard Erin Patrick Heather Debevec]

>> I THINK YOU GOT IT. THIRTY-DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL.

>> A THIRTY-DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL.

>> OUR LAST CASE TODAY IS 5H, 24-449. 2501 SUNRISE BOULEVARD

. ERIN PATRICK. >> YOUR HONOR, THIS IS CASE NUMBER 24-449, 2501 SUNRISE BOULEVARD, ERIN PATRICK. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON FEBRUARY 23RD OF THIS YEAR. THE FIRST HEARING DATE WAS MARCH 15 OF 2023. A REVIEW AND DETERMINATION WAS FOUND ON MARCH 15, 2023, FOUR IPMC 702.4, EMERGENCY ESCAPE OPENINGS, AND IPMC 304.2, PROTECTIVE TREATMENT. THE CITY REQUESTED OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATIONS EXIST, THAT THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED -- FOR STATE STATUTE 162.09, THE VIOLATION OF SECTION IPMC 702 POINT FOUR EMERGENCY ESCAPE OPENINGS AND IPMC 304.2 PROTECTIVE TREATMENT ARE CONSIDERED REPEAT VIOLATIONS AND AS SUCH, MAYBE FIND BEGINNING ON THE DATE THE REPEAT VIOLATION IS FOUND TO HAVE OCCURRED BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. THE DATE THE VIOLATION WERE FIRST IDENTIFIED AS FEBRUARY 23, 2024, AS ESTABLISHED BY PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PROVIDED. THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MUST BE TAKEN TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS -- REMOVE ALL WINDOW COVERINGS AND FULLY OPEN ALL SHUTTERS. PAINT ALL AREAS WHERE THE PAINT IS PEELING AND DISCOLORED. A FINE OF $500 SHALL COMMENCE ON THE DATE FIRST IDENTIFIED AND CONTINUE TO ACCRUE ALL THE PROPERTY IS BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE. SHE DID REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, BUT DUE TO THE VERY SHORT NOTICE, WE ARE STILL HERE TODAY.

>> YOU HAVE A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL VIOLATION ORDER?

>> IT SHOULD BE THE LAST PAGE OF THE FIRST SECTION. IT SHOULD

BE 1D. >> GOT IT. THANK YOU. THE CITY WOULD MOVE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS AND DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE AS

CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1. >> PHOTOS AND DOCUMENTS WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1.

THE PHOTOGRAPHS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED, I FIND THAT THE

[01:25:03]

>> THANK YOU. >> FOR CASES REQUIRING A HEARING , A NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE VIOLATOR'S CERTIFIED MAIL. IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED SIGNED, IT LACED IN THE FILE. IF IT'S RETURNED PLAYING, THE AFFIDAVIT ENCLOSED, VIA REGULAR U.S. MAIL. 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, EIGHT NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED. A NOTICE OF HEARING IS ALSO POSTED AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING. IF THE GREEN CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE ENFORCEMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS, THE POSTING IS COMPLETED, IN THE SAME MANNER AS IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED.

FOR CASES NOT MANDATED BY STATE STATUTE, MAINLY ON THE NOTICE OF HANDLING IN THE MANNER STATED PRIOR, IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED, UNCLAIMED, OR NOT RETURNED WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE HEARING, A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD IN CITY HALL.

>> THANK YOU. ANY OTHER BUSINESS ?

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.