[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:16]
HEARING, MAY 15, 2024 IS CALL TO ORDER. CAN WE PLEASE STAND
FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH
LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. >> PLEASE REMAIN STANDING.
[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR THAT THE TESTIMONY YOUGIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH? >> YES.
[A. 24-0474 CE 3004 Avenue J Larry Tullis & Evelyn Tullis (EST) Charmaine Kirkland]
>> THANK YOU. THE FIRST CASE TODAY IS 5A, AND VIOLATIONS. 24 E- 474. 3004 AVENUE J. LARRY AND EVELYN --. PLEASE COME UP TO THE PODIUM. MAKE SURE TO SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE. WHEN
YOU ARE READY. >> GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR.
CASE 24 E- 474. THREE 3004 AVENUE J. INITIATED FEBRUARY 3, 2024. OWNER IS LARRY TULLIS AND EVELYN TULLIS. VIOLATION OF SECTION 32 E- 28 SUBSECTION C RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTAINERS.
STORAGE OF COMMODITIES AND SECTION 24-19, 24-20, 24-21 SUBSECTION ONE AND SUBSECTION FIVE, NEW SINCE AS AN OBJECT AND OUTSIDE STORAGE. IP MC 304.2 PROTECTIVE TREATMENTS.
THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MINISTRY -- SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATIONS EXISTS THAT THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. MOVE ALL TRASH AND RECYCLING CONTAINERS TO THE SIDE OR REAR OF THE STRUCTURE ON NON-COLLECTION DAYS. REMOVE ALL MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS FROM INSIDE THE TRAILER AND PLACE THEM IN A SHED OR GARAGE. REMOVE PAINT BUCKETS, DOLLIES, CONCRETE BLOCKS, AND ANY OTHER ITEMS IN THE ABOVE-MENTIONED ORDINANCE AND STORE OUT OF PUBLIC VIEW, GARAGE OR SHED.
PAINT AND TRIM THE HOUSE WITH THE BARE WOOD IS LOCATED.
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING
ASSESSED. >> YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS?
>> YES. >> THEY DATED AND TIMESTAMP? DO THEY DEPICT THE VIOLATION YOU OBSERVED ON THE DATES?
>> GUESS. >> HAVE YOU SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPHS, SIR? WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE PHOTOGRAPHS? I'M GOING TO MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE. DO YOU WANT TO SEE THE BEFORE I DO THAT?
>> I THINK I LOOKED AT THEM. >> THE CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.
>> SUBMITTED AND ENTERED INTO THE CITY COMPOSITE, EXHIBIT
ONE. >> MISS KIRKLAND BEFORE TODAY, DID YOU HAVE ANY COMMUNICATION WITH THE OWNERS?
>> I HAD COMMUNICATION WITH MR. LARRY ONCE. AND, JUST NOW, HE WAS CONFUSED ABOUT THE VIOLATION. SO, HE UNDERSTANDS NOW THE STORAGE OF COMMODITIES VIOLATION. HE UNDERSTANDS WHAT HE NEEDS TO DO AND HE'S GOING TO CORRECT IT AFTER THIS.
>> ALL RIGHT. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? ALL RIGHT. WOULD
YOU LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING? >> WHAT I WAS CONFUSED ABOUT. I DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING ABOUT REMOVING THE THING FROM THE TRAILER BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT I DO EVERY OTHER DAY OR EVERY DAY. PICK UP SCRAP METAL. IT'S WHAT I DO. AS SHE SAID, STUFF WAS ON THE TRAILER. I DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT SHE
[00:05:03]
WAS SAYING BECAUSE ANYTIME I SEE JUNK OR SOMEBODY HAS JUNK THEY WON'T MOVE, THEY CALL ME. THAT IS WHAT I DO, I GO TO PICK IT UP. I REALLY DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IT MEANT BY REMOVING STUFF FROM THE TRAILER. LIKE RIGHT NOW. THAT IS WHAT I DID. THE LAST COUPLE OF DAYS. MY TRAILER RIGHT NOW IS FULL. FULL OF STUFF THAT I FINISHED CLEANING UP TO MAKE SURE I HADN'T CLEANED UP. WHEN I LEAVE HERE, I HAVE TO GO DUMP IT BECAUSE I REALLY DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. I DID NOT KNOW YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THE TRAILER RIGHT HERE. ANYTIME I GO TO WARWICK SOME DAYS AGO TO WARWICK BACK IN THE AFTERNOON WHEN I COME BACK, I CHECK OUT DIFFERENT BODY SHOPS AND PLACES AND A LOT OF THEM, THEY KNOW I'M COMING THEY HAVE TO PUT IT TO THE SIDE FOR ME. IF I DON'T GET IT THAT DAY, I WEIGHED INTO THE NEXT DAY TO GO BACK AND GET ANOTHER LOAD. BECAUSE YOU DON'T GET ANYTHING FOR DUMPING ONE OR TWO PIECES. AND, THAT IS WHY THE TRAILERS LOADED LIKE THAT ALL THE TIME BUT I DID NOT KNOW THAT WAS A PROBLEM UNTIL NOW.>> YOU UNDERSTAND NOW? AND IS TEN-DAY SUFFICIENT FOR YOU TO COMPLY WITH EVERYTHING ON THIS?
>> LIKE WHAT I'M SAYING NOW. IF I DUMP THE TRAILER RIGHT NOW, IT WILL BE EMPTY. BUT ME WORKING WITH IT, IT IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE SOMETHING ON IT. NOT DUMP AT THE TIME I COME
RIGHT IN. >> YES I HAVE. AT THE INITIAL CASE OPENING, THE WHOLE YARD WAS FILLED WITH STUFF. HE HAS
TO OUT THE TIME CLEANED IT UP. >> LET ME EXPLAIN ABOUT THE YARD. LIKE I TOLD YOU, I DEAL WITH SCRAP METAL AND ANYBODY DOING SCRAP METAL NOSE YOU DON'T GET TOO MUCH MONEY FOR SCRAP METAL. IT IS A CERTAIN PIECE OF METAL YOU GET DIFFERENT PRICES FOR. WHAT I WAS DOING AND I BEEN DOING THIS FOR OVER 20 YEARS. THE THING I GET THE MOST MONEY FOR, I WILL PUT IN A PILE BY ITSELF AND STUFF THAT IS THE LEAST MONEY I WILL PUT IT ON THE TRAILER AND GO TO DUMP THAT. STUFF I GET THE MOST MONEY FOR. IT'LL BE LIKE TRANSMISSIONS AND SOMETIMES ALUMINUM MOTORS AND STUFF LIKE THAT AND I GUESS THREE OR FOUR SOCKET HAVE ANOTHER -- OF MONEY AND I PUT IT ON THE TRAILER. BUT WHAT SHE WAS SAYING THAT YOU GIVE ME THAT NOTICE I HAVE NOT PUT ANYTHING ELSE IN THE YARD.
>> YOU HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE?
>> I HAVEN'T PUT ANYTHING ELSE IN THE YARD BECAUSE ME AND MY BROTHER WILL CLEAN IT UP. AS THE FIRST TIME ANYBODY MENTIONED ANYTHING LIKE THIS TO ME.
>> DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO ADD?
>> NOTHING. I FIND VIOLATION THAT YOU HAVE 10 DAYS TO MOVE ALL CONTAINERS TO THE SIDE IN THE REAR OF THE STRUCTURE AND REMOVE MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS FROM INSIDE THE TRAILER AND PUT THEM IN THE SHED OF GARAGE. REMOVE PAINT BUCKETS, DOLLIES, CONCRETE BLOCKS AND ANY ITEMS MENTIONED IN THE ORDINANCE AND STORE THEM OUT OF PUBLIC VIEW IN THE SHED OF THE GARAGE.
PAINT THE TRIM OF THE HOUSE. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 A DAY BEING ASSESSED. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE?
>> D1 A WHAT I SAID? >> I WAS JUST READING THE
VIOLATIONS. GO AHEAD? >> I NEED TO SIT DOWN NOW?
>> MICHELLE MAN WILL MEET WITH HIM OUTSIDE THE CHAMBERS.
>> KEEP IN TOUCH WITH HER, YEAH.
>> WHAT SHE READ OUT, YOU WILL GET AN ORDER THAT SAYS ALL THOSE THINGS IN WRITING SO YOU WILL HAVE A PIECE OF PAPER SAME WITH THE COURT HAS FOUND AND WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO.
UNDERSTOOD? THANK YOU. >> OKAY, THANK YOU.
[B. 24-80 CE 2001 Valencia Avenue BETTY JEAN SIMMONS Heather Debevec]
>> NEXT CASE IS 5B VIOLATION, 24-80, 2001 VALENCIA 24-80, 2001 VALENCIA AVE., BETTY JEAN SIMMONS.
[00:10:02]
>> GOOD MORNING. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 2484 2001 THIS IS CASE NUMBER 2484 2001 VALENCIA AVE. MISS BETTY JEAN SIMMONS. INITIATED ON JULY 19 THIS IS CASE NUMBER 2484 2001 VALENCIA AVE. MISS BETTY JEAN SIMMONS. INITIATED ON JULY 19, 2024 FOR I PMC 304.7, I PMC CITY REQUEST THAT OF THE T. THE- SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLENCE MIXES, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. REPAIR THE ROOFING OF THE COURTYARD, PAINT THE TRIM ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE GARAGE, PAINT THE WALL AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE COURTYARD. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED. I HAVE PHOTOS TO SUBMIT AND THEY ARE DATED AND TIME STAMPED.
>> DOES IT ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION YOU HAVE SERVED?
>> YES MA'AM. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE
PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YOUR HONOR, I SPOKE WITH MS. SIMMONS TWICE. DURING THE PROCESSES. DURING THE PAST MONTH OR TWO. SHE STATED SHE HAD BEEN ILL SHE TRIED TO FIND SOMEBODY TO HELP HER WITH THESE REPAIRS.
>> CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE THE CITY
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. >> PHOTO SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED A CITY COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.
>> MA'AM, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING?
>> I KEPT THE HOUSE UP. I PAINTED IT AND I KEPT IT UP.
AND THAT PIECE OF PLASTIC YOU SEE IS GONE. I GOT THE PLASTIC BACK. BUT I HAD A BRAIN BLEED . I KNOW IT NEEDS TO BE FIXED. I KNOW SOME THINGS NEED TO BE DONE. I'M JUST NOT ABLE TO DO IT AND IT'S HARD. TO DO ANYTHING THAT'LL BE FAIR AND TREAT YOU RIGHT. AND NOT TRY TO TAKE YOUR MONEY. AS SOON AS I FIND SOMEBODY TO FIX THIS, GOT THE ROOF OF THAT. SOON AS I FIND SOMEBODY TO DO IT. I DON'T THINK THEY'RE GOING TO BEAT ME OUT OF MY MONEY. AND BE SMART. THEN I WILL GET IT FIXED. IF IT IS ALL RIGHT. IF IT'S ALL RIGHT WITH YOU ALL.
>> MA'AM, THE CITY REQUESTS YOU 30 DAYS TO DO IT. IS THAT ENOUGH TIME OR DO YOU NEED MORE TIME?
>> I NEED MORE TIME. BECAUSE, I JUST NEED MORE TIME.
>> WHAT ABOUT 60 DAYS? OKAY. I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS, BUT
YOU HAVE 60 DAYS. >> OKAY, THAT'S TWO MONTHS?
>> RIGHT. >> WELL, LISTEN. I DON'T HAVE
[00:15:01]
AN CONTRACT ANYTHING FOR THIS. AND PAINT THE TRIM AND STUFF LIKE THAT. I DON'T HAVE TO DO THAT. I CAN FIND A HANDYMAN. TO>> OKAY. >> I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS, AND THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO REPAIR THE ROOFING ON THE COURTYARD, PAINT THE TRIM ON THE SIDE OF THE GARAGE AND THE WALL ON THE ENTRANCE TO THE COURTYARD. FAILURE TO DO SO AFTER 60 DAYS RESULTS IN $100 FINE BEING ASSESSED PER DAY.
YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO APPEAL. AND YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. IF
>> OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MA'AM.
>> MS. SIMMONS, I WILL GIVE YOU A CALL LATER.
>> OKAY, THANK YOU. >> MESS CASE, 5C, 24 E- 105, 2220 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1. TO LAY FLORIDA LLC.
>> GOOD MORNING. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, 24-105,
[C. 24- 105 CE 2220 S US Highway 1 TALAEE FL LLC Heather Debevec]
2220 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1, TALAEE FL LLC. INITIATED DINNER 19TH, 2024, SECTION 123-37 SUBSECTION 12 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, I WANT TO REQUEST R&D FOR THAT ONE. I PMC 302.7 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, THREE OR 4.1 EXTERIOR STRUCTURE, THREE OF 4.2 PROTECTIVE TREATMENT. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE SPECIAL FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. REPAIR THE FENCE WHERE BOARDS ARE MISSING AND PANELS THE FOLLOWING, PREPARE THE STUCCO ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DELIVERY DOOR THE FOLLOWING -- FALLING AND CRACKING AND PRESSURE WASH THE PAINT AND DISCOLORED AREAS ON THE STRUCTURE. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $200 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED.PHOTOGRAPHS EXIST AND THEY ARE DATED IN TIME STAMPED. WHEN I WENT OUT THERE MONDAY, THE MOWING AND TRIMMING FROM THE DEBRIS HAD BEEN TAKEN CARE OF WHICH IS WHY I REQUEST R&D ON
THE LANDSCAPE MINUTES. >> TO THE PHOTOS ACCURATELY DEPICT VIOLATION ON THE DAYS? AND HAS THE RESPONDENT HAD THE
OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE PHOTOS? >> THAT I'M AWARE OF.
>> DO YOU WANT TO SEE THE PHOTOGRAPHS?
>> NO, I'M OKAY. >> SIR, WERE YOU SWORN IN THIS MORNING AND WERE YOU HEAR WHAT EVERYBODY SWORE?
>> YEAH. >> ALL RIGHT. TO PHOTO SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. OKAY. I UNDERSTAND THE LANDSCAPING HAS BEEN TAKEN CARE OF?
>> YES MA'AM. >> SO THE OTHER THREE IS WAS
>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? >> AS FAR AS THE STUFF SHE PUT IN, SAID, I DO APOLOGIZE AND I CAN SEE THE LETTER IN THE FIRST PLACE. THERE WAS MANAGEMENT SWITCHING GOING ON. FINALLY, 100% THE PAST SUNDAY AS FAR AS PROMOTION GOES. WE ARE GOING TO GET DONE. THE BIGGEST THING RIGHT NOW BECAUSE THEY PATCHED IN SEALED HOLE THEY ARE IN THE PICTURE. AND THEY GOT A PAINT OVER IT. THEY PAINT OVER THE HARD STAINS OF AN EIGHTH -- THEY GET OFF ALL THE BLACK STAINS. SO, ONCE AGAIN, I APOLOGIZE ABOUT THAT. THE BIGGEST THING IN MOTION RIGHT NOW IS THE FENCE THAT YOU HAVE TO REPLACE THE WHOLE FENCE THEY SAID ACCORDING TO THE COMPANY THAT CAME OUT. SO, THAT'LL
TAKE A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME . >> HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU THINK?
>> PROBABLY A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN 20 DAYS. BECAUSE RIGHT NOW, THEY ARE SOURCING THE PRODUCT. AND GETTING WITH HOME OFFICES ABOUT THE PRICE OF IT. I'M WAITING ON THAT. I WAS HOPING 60 DAYS. ANYTHING YOU GUYS CAN GIVE ME WILL BE A
PLUS. >> I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS .
CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD?
>> MY NAME IS ROBERT HELLER. >> WHAT IS YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO
THE OWNER AND THE PROPERTY? >> I WAS A STORE MANAGER.
OPERATIONS MANAGER. AND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR, I WAS PUSHED INTO THE STORE BECAUSE THERE WAS A LOT OF ISSUES WITH THE STORE. AND I'VE BEEN THERE EVER SINCE. BUT I DON'T KNOW
[00:20:02]
THEM PERSONALLY. >> YOU HAVE AUTHORITY FROM THE
OWNER TO BE HERE? >> I TALKED AND I TOLD HER I WAS GOING TO BE HERE. SHE DID NOT SAY ANYHING AFTER THAT.
>> SHE DID NOT OBJECT? OKAY, THANK YOU. IF HE NEEDS TO REPLACE THE ENTIRE FENCE ONE APPOINTMENT BE REQUIRED?
>> YES MA'AM. >> DO WE WANT TO CHANGE RECOMMENDATIONS TO APPLY FOR A PERMIT?
>> YES MA'AM. HE WAS LIT RECOMMENDATIONS INTO TWO.
REQUEST R&D ON LANDSCAPING. FOR THE STUCK ON PRESSURE WASHER, WE REQUEST 20 DAYS ON THE SUMMARY SHEET. AND THEN, WE REQUEST 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMANENT AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR THE FENCE.
>> YOU SAID 60? >> OBTAIN THE PERMIT AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR THE FENCE.
>> YEAH. NOTHING ELSE? I WILL FIND VIOLATION EXISTS OTHER THAN THE LANDSCAPE THAT THE PRESSURE WASHER YOU WILL HAVE 20 DAYS. AND ON THE FENCE, YOU HAVE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT. AND COMPLY WITH WHAT PERMIT REQUIRES. FAILURE TO COMPLY RESULTS IN A FINE OF $200 A DAY BEING ASSESSED IF YOU DON'T DO IT IN A TIMELY FASHION.
>> OKAY. >> THE CITY WAS ASKING FOR YOU TO FIND THE VIOLATION OF THE LANDSCAPING DID EXIST BUT WAS
COMPLIED. >> I THOUGHT I SAID THAT. IT EXISTED BUT YOU COMPLIED WITH THE LANDSCAPING PORTION? ALL RIGHT. YOU DO HAVE A RIGHT TO APPEAL 30 DAYS IF YOU DECIDE
YOU WANT TO DO THAT. >> THE WRITTEN ORDER IS GOING TO GO TO THE OWNER AND THE REGISTERED AGENTS. IS THIS
CORRECT? >> CORRECT. SHOULD HE GIVE HIS EMAIL ADDRESS SO HE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT HE NEEDS TO DO?
>> I CAN DO THAT. CAN YOU PLEASE WRITE DOWN THE EMAIL ADDRESS AND LEAVE IT WITH THE CLERKS? THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, I WILL
[D. 24-84 CE 1903 Valencia Avenue MARLENY SANTAMARIA LUIS VASQUEZ CRUZ Heather Debevec]
CALL THE NEXT CASE WHILE SHE'S DOING THAT. NEXT CASE IS 24 E- 84 1903 NEXT CASE IS 24 E- 84 1903 VALENCIA AVE. MARLENY SANTAMARIA. AND LUIS VASQUEZ CREWS.>> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 2484 1903, VALENCIA AVENUE. MARLENY SANTAMARIA AND LUIS VASQUEZ CRUZ. CASE INITIATED, FEBRUARY 9, 2024, SUBSECTION FOUR. SECTION 24-19, 24-20, 24-21, OUTSIDE STORAGE. 24-19, 24-20, 24-21, SINCE AS AN OBJECT AN OUTSIDE STORAGE FURNITURE. THE CITY REQUEST THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THAT A VIOLATION OF SECTIONS STATED EXISTS. VIOLATORS SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IF A VIOLATION OCCURS AGAIN ON ANY PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VIOLATOR, THE STATUE, 16.206, SUBSECTION THREE AND ADDITIONAL TIME TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION IS NOT REQUIRED. THE MATTER WILL BE SCHEDULED BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MAY ORDER A FINE-TUNED CREW FOR EACH DAY THE REPEAT VIOLATION CONTINUES BEGINNING WITH THE DATE, FOUND TO HAVE OCCURRED BY THE CODE INSPECTOR. THE PERSON THAT YOU 162.09 SUBSECTION TO SUBSECTION A , THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE FOR THE REPEAT VIOLATION MAY BE UP TO $500 PER DAY. I HAVE PHOTOS THAT MAY BE SUBMITTED.
>> ARE THEY TIMESTAMP AND DO ACCURATELY DEPICT VIOLATIONS
OCCURRED? >> YES MA'AM. TO THE CITY MOVES THEM WAS AT A -- THE CITY MOVES THEM AS EVIDENCE AS COMPOSITE ONE. PHOTO SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES
COMPOSITE, EXHIBIT ONE. >> THERE IS NO ONE PRESENT? THEY ARE? I FIND THE VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 24 E- 19 , 24 E- 20, 24 E- 21 SUBSECTION FOUR NEW SINCE AND OBJECTS ON
[00:25:01]
PARKING OTHER THAN THE PAVEMENT. 24 E- 19 THE , 24/20 , 24 E- 21 SUBSECTION ONE NEW SINCE IS AN OBJECT OF OUTSIDE STORAGE. 2421 SUBSECTION 11. STORAGE OF FURNITURE EXISTS.BUT I FIND THE VIOLATION FOR THOSE EXISTED BUT WERE CURED PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING. THE CITY REQUESTED AND I FIND THE VIOLATOR BE NOTIFIED A VIOLATION OF THE SECTIONS OCCUR AGAIN, THE PROPERTY ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VIOLATOR PER STATUTE, 162 POINT SUBSECTION THREE, ADDITIONAL TIME TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION IS NOT REQUIRED AND THE MATTER CAN BE SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING FOR THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. PER STATUTE 162.09, SUBSECTION ONE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MAY ORDER A FINE-TUNED CREW FOR EACH DAY REPEAT VIOLATION CONTINUES BEGINNING THE DATE THE REPEAT VIOLATION IS FOUND TO OCCUR BY THE CODE INSPECTOR. THE PER STATUTE 162.09 SUBSECTION TWO, THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE OF THE REPEAT VIOLATION MAY BE UP TO $500 A DAY. THERE IS A 30 DAY RIGHT TO
[E. 24- 25 CE N 25th Street 1433-701-0080-000/9 JACQUELYN D PARKER Heather Debevec]
>> NEXT CASE IS 5E, VIOLATION CASE, 24-25, N. 25TH ST.,
JACQUELYN D PARKER. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, PREPARING FOR THE CASE, THE NEXT FOUR CASES ARE ALL ACTUALLY THE SAME PROPERTY AND SAME OWNER. WE WILL ADDRESS ONE AT A TIME BECAUSE THEY ARE SEPARATE PARCELS AND CASES.
BECAUSE THERE SEPARATE PARCELS, THEY HAVE SEPARATE CASE NUMBERS BUT IT IS LARGE AND JOINTLY OWNED PROPERTY WITH THE SAME OWNER. IT'LL BE TAKEN ONE PIECE AT A TIME. HE SEE SEVERAL
PHOTOS AS EACH CASE GOES ON. >> OKAY.
>> CASE NUMBER 2425 N. 25TH ST. PERSONAL ENDING, 009. THE NAME IS JACQUELYN D PARKER. INITIATED JANUARY 12 OF THIS YEAR. FOR IPM C30 4.1 EXTERIOR STRUCTURE, GENERAL, 304.2 , PROTECTIVE TREATMENT, 24-19, MAINTENANCE ON PROPERTY, 24-1, NEW SINCE AS A CONDITION. THE CITY REQUESTED OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THAT THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. REPLACE THE ROTTED WOOD AND PAINT THE PEELING AREAS, REPLACE THE IT IS PEELIN OBTAIN PERMIT AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS TO RELOCATE THE FENCE FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED. I HAVE PHOTOS AS DAMAGES MAINTAINED TO
BE SUBMITTED. >> TODAY ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE VIOLATION THAT YOU WITNESSED IN THOSE DAYS? YOU'RE MS. PARKER?
>> YES MA'AM. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE
PHOTOGRAPHS? OKAY. >> CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE ACIDIC COMPOSITES EXHIBIT ONE. PHOTO SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO RESPOND? YES. THE FACT THAT I HAD REPAIRED , ON THE ONE EDEN AVENUE SIDE CUSTOMER NOT THE PORTION RIGHT HERE? SOMEBODY HIT MY FENCE ONE NIGHT AND LEFT THE SCENE. THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED WITH THAT CART. AND IF I NEED TO HAVE IT FIXED, I'LL HAVE TO GO AHEAD AND GET IT FIXED.
[00:30:05]
CONVERSATIONS WITH THE RESPONDENT ABOUT WHAT NEEDS TOBE DONE? >> YES MA'AM. I EXPLAINED TO HER DEFENSE NEEDS TO BE MOVED OFF OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. I HAVE GIVEN INFORMATION FOR THE GRANT DEPARTMENT A COUPLE OF TIMES IN REFERENCE TO REPAIRS TO THE STRUCTURES ON THE PARCEL.
>> THE TESTIMONY IS THE ONE EITHER SIDE WAS HIT BY A VEHICLE? DOES IT ADDRESS THE VIOLATION ? DOES MOORE NEED TO
BE DONE? >> IT'S ON A DIFFERENT PARCEL PART OF THE FENCE WOULD STILL NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY. >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.
>> OF COURSE. >> REMOVED FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN IT TO ME?
>> CAN YOU ADJUST THIS ONE. >> I'LL BE HAPPY TO. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, ASPARAGUS PROPERTY WAS ONCE IN THE COUNTY. THE FENCE WAS PUT UP WHILE IN THE COUNTY HAS BEEN ANNEXED INTO THE CITY. THE SOURCE OF THE COMPLAINT CAME FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. BECAUSE, AS YOU SEE IN ONE OF THE UPCOMING CASES COME OF THE FENCE IS LITERALLY RIGHT UP AGAINST THE FIRE HYDRANTS. THAT IS WHAT CAUSED IT AS WE REVIEWED IT. SAW THE FENCE WAS PUT ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SO THE FENCE HAS TO BE MOVED BACK TO THE PROPERTY LINE. RIGHT NOW, IT IS TOO CLOSE TO THE STREET AND HAS TO BE MOVED BACK TO THE PROPERTY LINE. IT WASN'T INSTALLED ON THE PROPERTY LINE WHICH IS A LIMIT YOU ARE ALLOWED TO PUT IT.
>> MY QUESTION IS, WHY WASN'T SOMETHING SAID YEARS AGO BECAUSE THE FENCE HAS BEEN THERE SINCE 74.
>> WE UNDERSTAND. I WISH I CAN GIVE YOU AN ANSWER OF WHY THE COUNTY NEVER SAID ANYTHING. BUT THEY DIDN'T. NOW THAT IT'S BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION, WE DO HAVE TO ADDRESS IT.
COMPLAINT CAME IN FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND YOU UNDERSTAND HOW CLOSE THE FENCE AS TO THE HYDRANTS. BUT NOT IT'S BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION, WE DO HAVE TO ADDRESS IT SO THE FENCE HAS TO BE MOVED BACK TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE BEST WAY TO ADDRESS IT IS TO GET A SURVEY. YOU CAN USE THE PROPERTY APPRAISER OVERHEAD MAP AND WE HAVE TO PRINT IT OUT FOR YOU.
THAT IS EASY BUT IT'S NOT AN ACCURATE? IT'S A GENERAL EXAMPLE. IF YOU WANT TO KNOW EXACTLY WHERE THE PROPERTY LINES ARE AND YOU DON'T HAVE THE LITTLE MARKERS, IT IS BEST TO GET A SURVEY THAT'S WHERE THE FENCE NEEDS TO BE MOVED BACK TO. ANY MINOR REPAIRS USUALLY DO NOT REQUIRE A PERMIT IF YOU REPLACE IT IT IS BECAUSE IT IS BEING MOVED AND WILL
REQUIRE A PERMIT. >> I'M GOING TO HAVE TO FIND SOMEBODY TO HELP ME BECAUSE MY FAMILIES OUT OF TOWN. MY NEPHEWS, THEY ALL LIVE OUT OF TOWN AND IT IS JUST ME. I HAVE TO GO OUT AND FIND SOMEBODY TO ASSIST ME WITH THESE REPAIRS.
AND THEY NEED MORE TIME. >> THE CITY WAS ASKING , 30
DAYS TO COMPLY. >> SHE NEEDS A SURVEY AND A PERMIT TO MOVE THE FENCE? I'M RECOMMENDING. I'M NOT SAYING SHE NEEDS A SURVEY. THE FENCE HAS BEEN THERE FOR QUITE SOME TIME. SHE HAS A DEFINED MARKERS TO IDENTIFY WITH THE PROPERTY LINE IS. IT'LL PROBABLY BE IN HER BEST INTEREST TO GET THE SURVEY. HOWEVER WILL DO THE FENCE KNOWS WHERE TO PUT IT BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT TO MOVE IT AND A SECTIONBE DONE HAS TO
BE MOVED AGAIN. >> SHE WILL NEED A PERMIT.
>> WHAT'S A REASONABLE NUMBER OF DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT?
>> PERMITS CAN RECEIVE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME DAY AS LONG TO PROVIDE THE PROPER INFORMATION. AS LONG AS YOU PROVIDE THE INFORMATION OBTAINING, THE PERMIT, IT'S FAIRLY EASY. THE PREP WORK PRIOR TO PUTTING IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION. 230 TO O 60 DAYS WILL PROBABLY BE REASONABLE. TWO OBTAIN IT.
>> I HAVE TO COME UP WITH THE MONEY TO PAY WHOEVER WILL REMOVE THE FENCE. THAT'S AN EXPENSIVE JOB PLUS OF THE REPAIRS I NEED TO GET DONE. I AM WORKING WITH JUST WHAT I AM WORKING WITH EVERYDAY. I DON'T HAVE ANY EXTRA MONEY PUT ASIDE FOR THIS AND I DON'T KNOW HOW I WILL DO IT. BUT I WILL DO THE
BEST THAT I CAN GET IT DONE. >> SHE OBTAINS THE PERMITS. SHE HAS SIX MONTHS TO OBTAIN THE PERMITS.
>> WENT TO OBTAIN THE PERMITS, YOU HAVE SIX MONTHS TO COMPLETE
[00:35:03]
THE WORK. SO, WHAT WE RECOMMEND IS YOU HAVE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT AND COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS TO DO THE WORK WITHIN SIX MONTHS. IF YOU HAVE 60 DAYS, YOU HAVE AN ADDITIONAL SIX MONTHS TO DO THE WORK.>> YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? >> THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND YOU HAVE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT NECESSARY. ONCE YOU GET THE PERMITS FOR FOLLOW-UP WITH THE PERMIT REQUIRED, YOU HAVE SIX MONTHS TO COMPLETE THE WORK. SO, YEAH. I THINK THAT'S IT, FAILURE TO COMPLY WAS ALSO IN A FINE OF $100 A DAY. AFTER THE TIME HAS PASSED AND YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. YOU HAVE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT AND WHATEVER THE PERMIT REQUIRES AS FAR AS COMPLETING THE WORK.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, DID YOU WANT THE PAINTING AND WHAT NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE 60 DAYS AS WELL?
>> LET US MOVE IT AND MAKE IT EASIER. 60 DAYS TO COMPLY WITH ALL THREE OF THE REQUIREMENTS. NOT JUST THE FENCE BUT THE
PROJECTED TREATMENTS. >> PLEASE SHOW THE VIOLATION ON THE GROUND PLEASE. THANK YOU. THE PAINTING HERE AND THE WOOD.
>> YOU'LL HAVE 60 DAYS TO GET IT DONE. AS WELL AS TO OBTAIN
THE PERMIT. >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
>> NEXT CASE IS 5F IN VIOLATION CASE, --.
>> NO MA'AM, MA'AM? I NEED YOU TO STAY.
[F. 24- 26 CE 2490 Valencia Avenue JACQUELYN D PARKER Heather Debevec]
>> THEY WILL ALL BE VERY SIMILAR. NOT A LOT OF CHANGES.
>> 24-2690, VALENCIA AVENUE. JACQUELINE D PARKER.
>> THIS IS CASE NUMBER 24-26, 2490, VALENCIA AVE., JACLYN PARKER. INITIATED GENERALLY 12, 2024. I PMC, THREE OR 4.1 , EXTERIOR STRUCTURE, THE REAL 4.2, PROTECTIVE TREATMENT.
24-19, MAINTENANCE OF NUISANCE ON PROPERTY PROHIBITED, SECTION 24-21 SUBSECTION FOR NEW SINCE AS A CONDITION. VIOLATED BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO REPLACE ROTTEN WOOD AND PEELING AREAS. OBTAIN A PERMIT AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS TO MOVE THE FENCE FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED. PHOTOS ARE DATED AND
STAMPED. >> DO THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT VIOLATIONS COMMITTED ON THOSE DAYS?
>> YES MA'AM. >> THANK YOU. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE PHOTOGRAPHS HERE, MISS PARKER, OF 2490 VALENCIA AVE.?
>> YES. >> YES. CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE A CITY'S COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.
PHOTOS SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE A CITY COMPOSITE ONE. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE?
>> YES MA'AM. I OBTAIN THE PERMIT ALREADY. TO START THESE
REPAIRS. >> SO I WILL BE MOVING FORWARD
>> I DON'T REMEMBER SEEING A PERMIT. BUT NO, I HAVE TO GO
BACK AND LOOK. >> MISS PARKER, ARE YOU TALKING
[00:40:04]
ABOUT REPAIRS TO THE HOUSE ITSELF IN THE STRUCTURE?>> YES MA'AM. >> YOU ALREADY APPLIED AND
OBTAINED A PERMIT TO DO THAT? >> GUESS I HAVE IT. I DON'T HAVE IT WITH ME. I MIGHT HAVE A COPY ON MY CELL PHONE.
>> WHEN DID YOU OBTAIN THE PERMIT?
>> I BELIEVE THAT WAS 3 MAY. >> ALL RIGHT.
>> YOU OBTAINED IT YOURSELF? OR DID YOU HAVE A BUILDER AND A
HANDYMAN DID IT FOR YOU? >> I DID IT MYSELF.
>> YOU DID IT YOURSELF QUESTION OKAY. TWO IF YOU GIVE ME A FEW
MINUTES, I'LL LOOK IT UP. >> IF YOU FIND IT IN YOUR PHONE, MISS PARKER, LET US KNOW.
PERMIT NUMBER RIGHT THERE? >> YES.
>> >> DO WE WANT TO DO IT ON THE OVERHEAD SO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE CAN SEE?
>> HE DOESN'T LIKE THERE'S A PERMIT.
>> WE CAN STIPULATE IF YOU DON'T WANT TO PUT ON THE
OVERHEAD. >> HE STIPULATE SO THERE'S A PERMIT? FOR THE RESIDENTS? AND THE PERMIT NUMBER LET'S PUT IN
THE RECORD. PERMIT NUMBER? >> 24 E- 1588, 2490.
>> ALL RIGHT. THAT WOULD ADDRESS THE ROTTING WOOD. WE NEED THE PERMIT FOR THE FENCE. TO ACTUALLY DO THE PAINTING, ET CETERA. WE WANT TO CHANGE THE RECOMMENDATIONS.
>> THE ROTTING WOOD AND PEELING PAINT IS BEING ADDRESSED THROUGH THE PERMIT. TO COMPLY WITH THE PERMIT?
>> COMPLY WITH THE PERMIT CONDITIONS IN 60 DAYS FOR THE FENCE TO OBTAIN THE PERMITS. AND THEN ON THE ROTTING WOOD AND PEELING PAINT, BECAUSE THE PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED TO COMPLY WITH THE PERMIT CONDITIONS.
>> I FIND THE VIOLATION DID EXIST BUT THERE HAS BEEN A PERMIT OBTAINED. 24-1588 24-15882490. AND THAT THE VIOLATOR BE ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH SET PERMIT. AND THE OTHER VIOLATIONS SHOULD BE GIVEN TO BE CONSISTENT FOR 60 DAYS.
>> FOR THE FENCE TO COMPLY WITH THAT ONE. AND IF NOT, A FINE OF $100 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED AND YOU DO HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL AND YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO DO SO.
[G. 24-22 CE Juanita Avenue 1433-701-0078-000/2 JACQUELYN D PARKER Heather Debevec]
>> ALL RIGHT. >> THE NEXT CASE IS 5G IN VIOLATION, CASE NUMBER 24 E- 22. JUANITA AVENUE. JACLYN D
PARKER. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, CASE 2422. JUANITA AVENUE, PERSONAL , PROPERTY OWNER IS JACLYN PARKER. INITIATED GENERALLY 12, 2024. SECTION 24-19, MAINTENANCE OF NUISANCE ON PROPERTY PROHIBITED, SECTION 24-21 SUBSECTION FOR NEW SINCE AS A CONDITION. I PMC 302.7 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. THE CITY REQUEST THAT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THAT THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. OBTAIN A PERMIT AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS TO ADDRESS THE FENCE ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PREPARE THE FENCE WHERE IT IS FAILING AND DISCONNECTING OR REMOVE IT ENTIRELY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY. AND I DO HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS TO BE SUBMITTED.
>> TAKE THIS AND MATCH THE OTHER TWO FOR THE 60 DAYS.
>> THE PHOTOS , DO THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION YOU WITNESSED ON THE DAYS THEY ARE STAMPED? THANK YOU.
>> IS THIS THE SIDE OF THE PROPERTY WE SAW WITH THE VEHICLE? AND THIS PARTICULAR ONE?
[00:45:01]
>> I KNOW SHE DID REPLACE THE GATE ON THAT SIDE. BUT THE GATE IS LEANING AGAINST THE FENCE THERE.
>> AND THERE IS SOME OTHER THAT NEEDS TO BE MOVED UP RIGHT
AWAY. >> THE CITY MOVES THE PHOTOS OF THE EVIDENCE A CITY'S COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.
>> PHOTO SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES
EXHIBIT ONE. >> IT HAS THE PHOTO OF THE FIRE
HYDRANT. >> THIS ALSO INVOLVES THE FENCE
BEING MOVED. >> THIS IS ALSO THE ONE WITH
THE FIRE HYDRANT ON IT. >> OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THIS ONE?
>> HE SAID 10 FEET? OF THE PROPERTY LINE BELONGS TO THE CITY? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING?
>> NO MA'AM, WE DID NOT SAY THAT. LET ME SEE WHAT I CAN DO AN OVERHEAD. SO THIS GOES THE NORTH PARCEL. THIS ONE?
>> YES MA'AM. >> I'M TRYING TO ZOOM IN. SO, THIS IS NOT AN ACCURATE SURVEY IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. BUT THIS IS YOUR FENCE? AND THIS IS THE APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LINE? OKAY. YOU CAN SEE HOW FAR OFF. THIS SIDE, YOUR FENCE IS BACK? BUT ON THE SIDE, THE FENCE AS FAR TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY HERE.
ON THE SIDE IT ACTUALLY LOOKS OKAY? THESE ARE NOT ACCURATE? THE ACTUAL PROPERTY LINE. IT IS AN OVERHEAD VIEW SO IT IS APPROXIMATE. WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE IS. BUT THE FENCE IS HERE AND THIS WHOLE LENGTH HERE WILL NEED TO BE MOVED BACK ONTO THE
PROPERTY LINE. >> AND IT LOOKS LIKE ONCE UPON A TIME THE FENCE IS ABOUT THE SAME DISTANCE INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE SIDE PUT IN AGAIN IN THE COUNTY. AND WE CAN'T SAY WITH THE COUNTY LOOK THAT REVIEWED WHEN THEY DID THE FENCE ORIGINALLY. BUT THIS IS THE AREA REALLY NEED TO SEE ADDRESSED. AND MOVED BACK TO THE PROPERTY LINE.
>> CAN I ASK A QUESTION? WOULD SHE HAVE THE OPTION OF
ILLUMINATED THIS? >> REMOVING THE FENCE, YES.
THAT IS ANOTHER OPTION. I'M NOT SAYING YOU NEED TO DO THAT.
>> IT'S NOT A GOOD IDEA RIGHT NOW I HAVE GRAND PUPPIES AND
THEY ARE SMALL. >> I WAS WONDERING THAT WAS
USED AS A PROTECTIVE BARRIER. >> ALL RIGHT. I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND YOU HAVE 60 DAYS WITH THE OTHERS. TO HAVE A PERMIT. OBTAIN THE PERMIT. AND FROM THAT POINT ON WE FIND WITH THE PREMISES. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. THE
[H. 24-30 CE VALENCIA AVE 1433-701-0098-000/8 JACQUELYN D PARKER Heather Debevec]
NEXT CASE IS FIVE AGE IN VIOLATION CASES CASE NUMBER 24 E- 30, VALENCIA AVENUE. JACLYN D PARKER. TWO THIS IS CASE NUMBER 2430, VALENCIA AVENUE, ENDING IN 08. JACLYN PARKER.CASE WAS INITIATED GENERALLY 12, 2024, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, THE CITY REQUEST IF THE MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 20 DAYS TO PREPARE THE FENCE WHERE IT IS LEANING, FALLING AND DISCONNECTING OR REMOVED ENTIRELY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 A DAY BEING ASSESSED AND I DO HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS TO BE SUBMITTED.
>> ARE PHOTOGRAPHS DATED AND TIMESTAMP? DO THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION YOU WITNESSED ON THOSE DAYS?
>> YES MA'AM. >> OKAY, THANK YOU.
[00:50:02]
>> CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE A CITY COMPOSITE
EXHIBIT ONE. >> PHOTO SUBMITTED WILL BE ANSWERED A CITY COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. I'M ASSUMING THE CITY HAS NO OBJECTION TO CITY -- 60 DAYS ON THIS ONE?
>> THAT'S CORRECT. >> TO CLARIFY COME DOES IT NEED TO BE MOVED IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY? IS IT NEEDS TO BE
REPAIRED. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE
ANYTHING TO ADD? >> THE ORDER HAS BEEN REPAIRED.
NEAR THE GATE AREA WHERE THE TREES ARE IN ON IT. WHERE THEY POPPED OUT BECAUSE THE TREES ARE GOING THAT FAR HAS BEEN REPAIRED. AND THE GATE IS LEANING. SEEMS HAVE BEEN
REPAIRED ALSO. >> IS THERE MORE TO BE
REPAIRED? >> FURTHER DOWN THE CHAIN LINK
IS COMING OFF. >> I FIND VIOLATION EXISTS IN THE VIA -- THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO REPAIR THE FENCE. FAILURE TO DO SO IN THAT TIME WILL REULT IN $100 DAY FINE. THERE IS A $30 RIGHT -- A 30 DAY TIME TO APPEAL.
>> THANK YOU, THE SPARK APPEARED
>> IS THAT IT? >> THAT'S IT. THANK YOU.
[A. 23-2992 CE 1102 Avenue F 31st Street Sanctuary of God Inc Manuel Fernandez]
>> THE NEXT CASE IS 6A, AND THE MASSEY HEARING, 23-2992. 1102 AVENUE F. 31ST ST., CENTURY OF GOD INC. SANCTUARY OF GOD INC.
>> ARE YOU HERE ON BEHALF OF 31ST ST. SANCTUARY OF GOD INC.? CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD ?
>> --. >> WHAT IS YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO
THE OWNER? >> I AM THE PASTOR OF THE
CHURCH. >> DO YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY OF THE OWNER TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER TODAY?
>> YES. >> THANK YOU. CAN I HAVE YOUR
LAST NAME ONE MORE TIME PLEASE? >>'S --.
>> THANK YOU. >> GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR.
TODAY BEFORE YOU I HAVE CASE NUMBER 23-292 , ADDRESS IS 1102 AVENUE F. OWNED BY 31ST ST. SANCTUARY OF GOD INC. INITIATED NOVEMBER 13, 2023. A LOCK -- LOT CLEARING MASSEY.
VIOLATIONS, 24-19. MAINTENANCE OF NUISANCE ON PROPERTY PROHIBITED. 24-11. NEW SINCE AS A CONDITION. FINDINGS IN CASE FOLLOW-UPS, NOVEMBER 13. NOTICE OF VIOLATION WAS SENT OUT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. NOVEMBER 15. PROPERTY WAS POSTED AS A NUISANCE WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. NOVEMBER 27.
FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED AND PROPERTY HAD NOT BEEN CUT. DECEMBER 11. A FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION WAS DONE TO THE PROPERTY, THE LOT HAD STILL NOT BEEN CUT. DECEMBER 19. CONTRACTOR CUT THE LOT SUBMITTED BEFORE AND AFTER PHOTOS WITH THE INVOICE. EVERY SIX. A REQUEST FOR A MASSEY HEARING RECEIVED. FEBRUARY 6. PRODUCTION CRITERIA WAS ONE, THE GRAVITY OR SERIOUSNESS OF THE VIOLATION WAS MODERATE. ANY AND ALL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE VIOLATOR TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS, WAS NONE. PROPERTY WAS CUT BY THE CITY VENDOR. ANY PREVIOUS VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY THE VENDOR, BY THE VIOLATOR, NONE. PROPERTY WAS ACQUIRED IN 2023. RECOMMENDATIONS ARE TO BE
DETERMINED. >> AND I DO HAVE PICTURES TO INTRODUCE THAT I TOOK WHEN I HAD THE CASE THAT IT ACCURATELY
[00:55:08]
DATE AND TIME STAMPED FROM THE VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED.>> WHAT ELSE IS IN THE STACK, ANYTHING ELSE?
>> JUST THE PHOTOS BUT I CAN ADD THE LETTER WE RECEIVED FROM
THE BISHOP REQUESTING --. >> WE WILL DO THE PHOTOS AS ONE
AND THE LETTER AS TO. >> THERE'S A MAP INCLUDED AT
THE END THAT SHOW THE PROPERTY. >> ALL RIGHT. WHAT WAS THE AMOUNT IN THE INVOICE YOU RECEIVED?
>> THE AMOUNT OF THE INVOICE WAS --.
>> DO YOU KNOW THE AMOUNT, PEGGY?
>> I WILL NEED TO LOOK AT IT. >>
>> YES MA'AM. THE AMOUNT OF THE INVOICE WAS $750. WE INCLUDE THE 100 ADMINISTRATION FEE ON TOP. THE INVOICE WAS $850 SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
>> THE HARD COST INCURRED ON CLEARING THE PROPERTY?
>> $750. YES MA'AM. I'M SORRY? THAT WAS RIGHT THERE. LET'S SHOW THE STOCK EVERYTHING WE WANT TO PUT INTO EVIDENCE AND LET'S HAVE THEM TAKE A LOOK AT. ARE THE PHOTOS WE ARE LOOKING AT YOUR PHOTOS? THE CONTRACTORS PHOTOS? THANK YOU.
>> HE IS ALSO PRESENT HERE TODAY. ALL RIGHT. THE CITY WILL MOVE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE CONSISTING OF PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN NOVEMBER 7. NOVEMBER 15.
NOVEMBER 27. DECEMBER 11. AND THEN, DECEMBER 18 BY THE CONTRACTOR AS HE TESTIFIED. DECEMBER 19 BY THE CONTRACTOR.
AS WELL AS PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY ON DECEMBER 28. AND IN OVERVIEW FROM THE PROPERTY APPRAISER OFFICE. THAT'LL BE
CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. >> PHOTO SUBMITTED WILL BE ANSWERED CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. EXHIBIT TWO WE MOVE INTO EVIDENCE THE LETTER FROM THE BISHOP --.
>> RECEIVED FEBRUARY 6. COPY OF THE AFTERNOON OF MAILING. AND THE BID LIST WORKSHEET. THE INVOICE IS NOT ATTACHED BUT I HAVE A COPY. IS ATTACHED TO THAT? I'M SORRY. I'M SORRY, IT IS AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING FOLLOWED BY AN INVOICE. AND THE BID LIST WORKSHEET COMPOSITE EXHIBIT TWO.
>> DOCUMENT SUBMITTED WILL BE ANSWERED A CITY COMPOSITE NUMBER TWO. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD?
>> NO MA'AM, THAT IS IT. >> ANYTHING ELSE?
>> NO MA'AM. WOULD YOU LIKE TO RESPOND?
>> THE MIX OBTAINED BECAUSE THE ADDRESS ON THE PAPERWORK FROM THE CITY IS NOT THE ADDRESS OF THE LOT. SO THE LOT WAS CUT.
BUT THE ADDRESS ON THE PAPERWORK WAS CUT AND NOT THE PICTURES THAT WERE SHOWN. WHEN WE GOT THE VIOLATION FROM THE LETTER. BECAUSE WE WANT TO SELL THE PROPERTY. AND THE ADDRESS
[01:00:09]
IS NOT 1102 BUT 11 F. THAT IS THE ADDRESS. OF THE PROPERTY TO THE ACTUAL ADDRESS. IT DOESN'T HAVE AN ADDRESS.>> 1102 OPENING F IS NOT THE ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY
>> THE PARCEL I.D. IS ACTUALLY THE OFFICIAL DESCRIPTOR AND THAT IS INCLUDED ON ALL OF THE NOTICES. THAT IS ALSO WHY WHEN THEY WERE OUT, THEY POSTED THE PROPERTY SO THAT THERE IS NO CONFUSION ON WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. I DO HAVE A NOTICE TO THE OWNER.
DATED NOVEMBER 15. THAT INCLUDES THE FIRST LADY.
>> KENNY TESTIFIED AS TO WHAT DOCUMENT IS? LET THE WITNESS
TAKE A LOOK AT IT. >> THIS IS THE LETTER POSTING THAT WE ASKED JULIE -- TO PROPOSE ON THE PROPERTY. TO SHOW IT IS THE CORRECT PROPERTY FOR WHAT THE VIOLATION WAS
BEING CITED FOR. >> THAT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN
SENT ? >> YES MA'AM. THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION WAS SENT IN THE POST AND WAS SENT. AND THE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING WAS ALSO SENT TO THEM.
>> IT'S YOUR TESTIMONY THAT EXHIBIT THREE, WHICH I MARKED, WAS ACTUALLY MAILED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER, IS THAT CORRECT? IT CONTAINED THE TAX I.D. NUMBER CORRECT? PLEASE SHOW THE EXHIBIT TWO TO THE WITNESS.
>> EVERY COMMUNICATION I'VE GOTTEN SAYS, PROPERTY ADDRESS, 1102 AVENUE F. THAT HAS A TAX I.D. NUMBER ON IT.
>> OF THING YOU RECEIVED HAS THE TAX NUMBER. IT HAS THE ADDRESS 1102. AVENUE S. I OWN SEVERAL PROPERTIES. I NEVER HAD THIS PROBLEM. WITH ANY VIOLATION OF THE ADDRESS, THE VIOLATION IS TAKEN CARE OF WITH THE ADDRESS.
>> BEFORE YOU CONTINUE, I MOVE THE DOCUMENT INTO EVIDENCE AT EXHIBIT THREE. TO MY WITNESS HAS TESTIFIED IT WAS MAILED. I WANT TO MOVE THE DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE.
>> AS THE CITY EXHIBIT NUMBER THREE. AND THAT DOCUMENT WILL BE ENTERED A CITY EXHIBIT THREE. THE NOTICE TO THE OWNER.
THEY DESCRIBE THE PROPERTY. IN VIOLATION.
>> LET ME CONFIRM WITH MY WITNESS. THE PROPERTY THAT WAS CITED IN THE PROPERTY CUT BY THE CONTRACTOR . WAS THE PROPERTY TAX I.D. 2401. 2204? 204-822-0015. 000\EIGHT.
>> YES MA'AM. >> THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY,
WHO WAS THAT? >> THAT'LL BE 31ST ST.,
SANCTUARY OF GOD. >> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. THERE WAS NO MISTAKE IN THE PROPERTY THAT WAS CITED AND PROPERTY CUT? YOU CUT THE PROPERTY CITED?
>> THE CONTRACTOR CUT THE PROPERTY THAT WAS CITED.
>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. >> ANYTHING ELSE?
>> WELL. I'M NOT SAYING THE PROPERTY WASN'T CUT. I'M SAYING THE CONFUSION CAME WITH THE ADDRESS.
>> OKAY. >> AVENUE F IS NOT THE ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY. OR HAVE I BEEN SENT PICTURES OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE BEGINNING? I COULD'VE SEEN WITH THE PROPERTY LOOK LIKE. I HAD NEVER SEEN THE PROPERTY. THERE WAS A PICTURE SENT TO ME OF THE PROPERTY. OF WHAT NEEDS TO BE CUT. OF THE
[01:05:05]
COUNTIES AND THEY DO SEND PICTURE OF THE VIOLATION OF WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE. I DID NOT RECEIVE ANY PICTURES EITHER. WE SEND SOMEBODY TO CUT THE PROPERTY AND THEY CUT 1102 AND THEY CUT 11 02F WHICH IS THE WRONG PROPERTY.>> >> OTHER VACANT LOT. IN FRONT
OF THE PROPERTY. >> DOES THE CHURCH ON BOTH?
>> >> IF YOU CAN LOOK AT THE OVERHEAD, THIS IS AN INTERIOR LOT BEHIND 1102 AVENUE AVE.
NONE OF THE PROPERTIES ARE OWNED BY THE CHURCH. SO, THE CONFUSION I'M HAVING A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING THE CONFUSION BECAUSE THE CHURCH KNOWS WHICH LOT THEY OWN AT LEAST I ASSUME THAT'S THE ASSUMPTION THE CHURCH KNOWS WHICH LOT THEY OWN AND CAN GIVE PROPER DIRECTION. THIS IS 1102
AVENUE F AND AN INTERIOR LOT. >> DOESN'T HAVE ITS OWN ADDRESS BECAUSE IT IS CONNECTED TO 1102 AVENUE F. IT IS ASSUMED THE CHURCH KNOWS WHAT PROPERTY THEY OWN. TO CLARIFY, ARE YOU SAYING LOOKING AT THE OVERHEAD, THE PROPERTY AND THE YELLOW SQUARE WAS NOT CUT BY THE CONTRACTOR?
>> PROPERTY IN THE YELLOWCAKE -- YELLOW SQUARE WAS CUT. WE
CUT 1102 AVENUE F. >> BUT YOU DO NOT OWN?
>> WE DO NOT OWN. THIS IS THE THING, WE HAVE NEVER SEEN THE PROPERTY. WE ACQUIRED THE PROPERTY. AND WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME WE SAW IT WHEN WE CAME DOWN HERE. SO WE DON'T KNOW THE PROPERTY. WE HAVE NEVER SEEN THE PROPERTY. THE ONLY TIME WE HAVE FOUND OUT IN THE MIX OF IT, IS WHEN WE WENT TO SELL THE PROPERTY. ED, THE REALTOR BUT THE SIGN ON 1102 AVENUE F BECAUSE I SENT HER THE SAME INVOICE. AND A FEW MONTHS LATER, SHE SAID, YOU DON'T OWN THE PROPERTY. THIS IS SOMEBODY ELSE'S PROPERTY. I SAID WHAT YOU MEAN WE DON'T OWN IT, WE DO? I SENT HER THE DEED AND EVERYTHING. SHE SAID, NO, THIS IS SOME KIND OF MIXER. THIS PROPERTY IS A 10,000 SQUARE-FOOT LOT AND YOU GUYS DO NOT OWN IT. SO THIS IS HOW I COME TO THE KNOWLEDGE WE HAVE THE WRONG ADDRESS ON THE CITY'S PAPERWORK.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, AS A FINAL REVOCATION. WE DO POST THE PROPERTY THAT THERE IS A VISUAL BECAUSE WE DO HAVE INTERIOR LOTS LIKE THE SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND WE USE THE BEST DESCRIPTORS THAT WE CAN AND PARCEL I.D.
WHICH MAKES IT CLEAR WHICH ONE IT IS ALSO POSTED VERY CLEARLY.
LEVERS BEING INVOLVED, KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE REFERRING
TO BEST PURPOSE OF THE POSTING. >> HOW DID YOU CONTRACT CUT THE
WRONG >> THE TESTIMONIES HIS CONTRACTOR CUT THE WRONG GRASS. OUR CONTRACTOR DID NOT CUT THE WRONG GRASS. I DON'T WANT TO PUT WORDS INTO ANY WORDS -- ANYBODY'S MOUTH. THE CONTRACTOR IS OVER THERE. WOULD
YOU LIKE TO TESTIFY, OKAY. >> SIT DOWN AND GIVE YOUR NAME
FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE? >> WERE YOU HERE WHEN WE SWORE
IN THE WITNESSES? >> KNOWN -- NO.
>> THAT'S WHERE YOU IN FIRST. RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND . DO YOU SWEAR THE TESTIMONY YOU GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH? THANK YOU.
CAN YOU PUT THE OVERHEAD THAT SHOWS THE PROPERTY IN FRONT OF
THE PROPERTY BEHIND? >> ALL RIGHT. LOOKING AT THE DIAGRAM, WHICH PROPERTY DID YOU CUT?
>> TO THE PROPERTY IN THE YELLOW SQUARE. IN THE TESTIMONY ESTABLISHED THAT IS PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE 31ST ST.
SANCTUARY OF GOD. >> ALL RIGHT. DO YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS? >> I WAS CURIOUS AS TO --. NOW
THAT I KNOW THE CORRECT PART. >> THE HONOR I GUESS GRATUITOUSLY CUT SOMEONE ELSE'S LAWS.
[01:10:02]
>> YES. THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING OF HIS TESTIMONY.
>> CAN YOU PUT UP THE TWO PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY THE
CONTRACTOR BEFORE AND AFTER. >> ALL RIGHT. DID YOU TAKE
THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES MA'AM.
>> BEFORE AND AFTER IT WAS CUT? >> DO THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT
THE WORK YOU DID THAT DAY? >> THANK YOU. THE CITIES RECOMMENDING THE AMOUNT BILLED DUE TO BE PAID TO THE CITY.
850. >> I FIND THAT THE AREA THAT WAS CUT WAS THE CORRECT LOT AND THE ACTUAL AMOUNT WAS 750+ $100 ADMINISTRATION FEE. IT IS WHAT SHOULD BE PAID. IS THERE
ANYTHING ELSE? >> I BELIEVE HE HAS A 30 DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL THE FINAL ORDER. IS THERE A TIMEFRAME?
>> YES. 30 DAYS TO PAY? >> I'M GOING TO APPEAL IT ONLY BECAUSE I STILL FEEL THE RIGHT ADDRESS WAS NOT SENT ON THE NOTIFICATION. WE WOULD HAVE CUT THE LOT OURSELVES AND NOT INCUR
AN $850 BILL. >> THE CITY IMMENSE THE REQUEST IN 15 DAYS, WITH A 30 DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL.
>> SO ORDERED. >> THE ORDER WILL BE MAILED TO
[A. 23-0001 CE 110 N 11th St Pierre S Camille Peggy Arraiz]
>> THANK YOU YOUR HONOR. >> THE LAST CASE TODAY, 78, LIEN REDUCTION REQUEST. CASE 23-0001. 110, N. 11TH ST., PIERRE S CAMILLE. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, I WILL BE READING
>> 23-001. 110 N. 11TH ST., OWNED BY PIERRE S CAMILLE.
INITIATED JANUARY 4, 2023, BEFORE YOU FOR A LIEN REDUCTION. SECTIONS CITED WERE 24-19, 24-20, 24-21 SUBSECTION ONE AND FIVE FOR THE OUTSIDE STORAGE. SUBSECTION 11 FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE OF INDOOR FURNITURE. AND SUBSECTION 10 AND D FOR NONOPERATIVE VEHICLES. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ROSS FOUND IN VIOLATION AND FOUND -- PROVIDED 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR BE FINED $150 A DAY. FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED DECEMBER 5 -- PROVIDED 10 DAYS TO COMPLY OR BE FINED $150 A DAY. FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED DECEMBER 5, 2023. PROPERTY WAS FOUND IN VIOLATION. THAT IS WHEN THE FINEST STARTED. NOTICE OF THE FINE, AS A MESSY NOTICE, SENT TO THE OWNER DECEMBER 13, 2023. THE CITY DID NOT RECEIVE A RESPONSE. JANUARY 18, NOTICE OF THE FINE, AS A MESSY NOTICE, SENT TO THE OWNER DECEMBER 13, 2023. THE CITY DID NOT RECEIVE A RESPONSE. JANUARY 18, 2024, THE IMPOSING LIEN WAS ISSUED.
MARCH 19. LIEN WAS ALSO SENT TO THE OWNER. MARCH 19, 2024, AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE WAS ISSUED AND THAT'S WHEN THE FINES WERE STOPPED. ADMINISTRATION FEES TOTAL $15,040. DURING THAT TIME, SIX INSPECTIONS WERE MADE. ON JULY 4, 2023. MAY 15, 2023. MAY 29, 2023. THERE WAS A 6'1".
DECEMBER 5, 2023. WHITE FIFTH AND MARCH 13. WHEN WE ARE DEALING WITH LIEN REDUCTION, THERE ARE CRITERIA THAT HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED IN ADDRESSING THE AMOUNT OF THE LIEN. THAT'S A SERIOUS TEST OF THE VIOLATION. THEY WERE MINOR AND MODERATE FROM THE STUFF WHEN HE WAS OUTSIDE STORAGE THE NONOPERATIVE VEHICLE. IT'D TAKE 10 MONTH COMMITTEE COMPLIANCE. AND THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE VIOLATOR WAS PRODUCED THE AMOUNT OF VIOLATION IS ONE. THERE WERE SIX NOTICES OF VIOLATIONS ISSUED IN THE PAST BUT ONLY WHEN IT BECAME SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. AN EXTENUATING FACTORS PROVIDING COMPLIANCE STAFF IS NOT AWARE OF ANY. WHY IT WASN'T COMPLIANCE AND IS NO OTHER PENDING VIOLATION. THEY ARE IN THE FOLDER.
[01:15:16]
>> I BELIEVE IT IS THIS WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. SIX PREVIOUS NOTICES. NEVER FINDING THE OTHER BROWSER. STAFF COMPILES THE FRUSTRATION CHARGES FOR ADDRESSING THE CODE VIOLATION FROM BEGINNING TO END WHICH INCLUDES MAILINGS AND FILING FEES AND WHATNOT IN ADDITION TO THE PROCESSING OF THE FILE. SUCH AS INSPECTIONS AND WHATNOT. BECAUSE IT IS A LIEN REDUCTION, THERE IS A MANDATORY APPLICATION FEE OF TWO $50 INCLUDED IN THE MINISTRATION CHARGES. ESTIMATED CHARGES FOR PROCESSING THE CASE IS $1420. AND THEN, STAFF BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE FILE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REQUESTING PARTY, THEY DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO MAKE ANY RECOMMENDATION BELOW ADMINISTRATION , ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORIZED AMOUNT OF $5000 THAT IS WHEN STAFF IS ALLOWED TO REDUCE TO THE $5000 AND DID NOT FIND SUBMISSION EVIDENCE TO REDUCE IT BELOW THAT. ANY REDUCTION HAD COME FROM THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. TO WHAT EXTENT ARE THERE EXTENUATING
CIRCUMSTANCES >> DO YOU HAVE ANY OF THOSE?
>> LET ME TELL YOU WHAT HAPPENED. I HAVE ONLY ONE AREA.
>> I DID NOT RECEIVE THE RESULT OF MY LAST --. I TALKED TO JEANNIE AND THE HOST. WE DID NOT SEE ANY NOTICE IN MY CASE.
DECEMBER 13, DECEMBER 13, 2020 THIRD. THEY SENT ME A LETTER SAYING I'M IN VIOLATION. AND DECEMBER 10, I SENT BACK THE ANSWER TO INFORM. JANUARY 22, 2024. I RECEIVED A CALL FROM MR. ISAAC. FEBRUARY 13, 2024, THEY SENT ME A LIEN ORDER JANUARY 18, 2024. MARCH 13, 2024, MARCH 12, 2024. MR. ISAAC CALLED ME. FOR THE INSPECTION ON MARCH 13. 12,024. CODE ENFORCEMENT SENT ME A LETTER SAYING THE PROPERTY DID NOT FALL INTO COMPLIANCE. IN A TIMELY MANNER. A LIEN HAS BEEN FIELDED. I WENT TO THE OFFICE. MISS MARGARET SAID TO ME. THE OFFICE DID NOT RECEIVE MY ANSWER. I SHOWED HER THE RECEIPTS AND A COPY OF MY LETTER. HE SAID, I'M SUPPOSED TO SEND CERTIFIED MAIL. INSTEAD OF THE REGULAR MAIL.
>> YOU'RE SAYING YOU RESPONDED AND THE CITY NEVER RECEIVED THE
RESPONSE? >> I SHOWED HER THE COPY OF MY LETTER. AND THE RECEIPT OF THE MAILING.
>> JUST A CORRECT MR. PEER. I BELIEVE HE SPOKE WITH CATHERINE, NOT ME? YES. I HAVE NOT HAD THAT OPPORTUNITY. I'M
[01:20:01]
AND HOPEFULLY HAVE THE RIGHT MOUSE. I'M GOING TO PUT MR. PEER'S REQUEST. PART OF THE REQUEST HE STATES THAT HE RECEIVED THE MESSY NOTICE AND RESPONDED IN WRITING. THE OFFICE NEVER RECEIVED THE LETTER AND HAVE NOT RECEIVED IT TO THIS DAY. THE ONLY PROOF HE WAS ABLE TO PROVIDE. THIS IS THE LETTER STATING HE SENT. WE DID NOT RECEIVE IT UNTIL APRIL.SHE DID PROVIDE THAT HE PURCHASED A STAMP. THAT IS THE ONLY PROOF HE HAS THE LETTER WAS ACTUALLY SENT SAYING HE WAS SENT. WE NEVER RECEIVED IT. WE FOLLOWED THE NORMAL PROCESSES AND PUT EVERYTHING IN PLACE AND FILED A LIEN .
>> CAN WE GO BACK TO THE LETTER?
>> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE? >> AN EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCE.
>> THE PHOTOS FROM DECEMBER 4 I WILL HAVE YOU PASS IT TO MR. PEER. SHOWING WHAT THE VIOLATIONS WERE. THAT NEEDED TO
BE ADDRESSED. >> AND THE FIRST ONE. MR.
ISAAC, I CAN KEEP THIS ONE? >> SIR? CAN WE PUT THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE FIRST AND I WILL GIVE THEM BACK TO YOU AND YOU CAN TALK ABOUT THEM WHILE WE SCROLL THROUGH THEM?
>> THE QUESTION RIGHT NOW IS WHETHER THEY ARE AUTHENTIC PHOTOGRAPHS. WHAT IS THE DATE ON THE PHOTOGRAPHS, JANIE?
>> DECEMBER 4, 2020. >> ARE THESE ACCURATE? I DID NOT UPLOAD THEM. IT WAS NEEDED TO BE DONE TO THE COMPLIANCE.
OKAY, THANK YOU. THE CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE A
CITY'S COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. >> FOR THE RECORD, THESE ARE PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN ON DECEMBER 4. 2023. PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE ANSWERED IN THE CITY'S COMPOSITE NUMBER ONE. AND WE
[01:25:01]
ONLY HAVE ONE COPY? >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THE REASON I WANT TO BRING THE PHOTOS INTO EVIDENCE. IS YOU WOULD ASK IS THERE ANY EXTENUATING FACTORS CAUSING NONCOMPLIANCE TO CONTINUE? IT'S KIND OF A MINOR MODERATE.
ALL REALLY OUTSIDE STORAGE THAT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO PERMIT THAT WERE REQUIRED AND NO MAJOR REPAIR ISSUES AND ANYTHING THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. IT WAS OUTSIDE STORAGE THAT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. AND THAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF ME SUBMITTING THE PHOTOS.
>> THE TESTIMONY WAS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOUND IN
VIOLATION ON MAY 17, 2023? >> CORRECT. TO HE WAS ORDERED TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION WITHIN 10 DAYS? IT WAS OUT FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD TO DEAL WHILE HE WAS ADDRESSING THAT. A LOT OF THE INSPECTIONS GOT PUSHED BACK QUITE SOME TIME. THERE WAS ACTUALLY EXTRA MONTH ADDED TO THE TIME TO COMPLY. I WANT TO EXPLAIN THIS WAS NEEDED TO BE CLEANED UP AND DID NOT REQUIRE ANY TYING -- ANY KIND OF PERMITS OF ANY THING LIKE THAT
TO BE JUST. >> MR. CAMILLE, YOU SAID YOU MAILED A LETTER ON SEPTEMBER 20? IS THAT RIGHT?
>> YES. >> WHEN YOU MAILED THE LETTER, WITH THE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE?
>> I RECEIVED THE INSPECTION FROM MR. ISAAC.
>> SAY THIS AGAIN? >> IN JANUARY, I RECEIVED THE INSPECTION FROM WHEN THEY MADE IT IN JANUARY. I BELIEVE IT IS
>> I'M NOT AWARE OF IT BEING DONE ON JANUARY. CAN WE GO BACK
TO MISCREANT? TO . >> WROTE DOWN THE INSPECTION,
SEPTEMBER 5. >> NEXT INSPECTION FROM OUR RECORDS WAS NOT UNTIL MARCH 5.
>> THE VIOLATOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES FOR $1023.23. THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME CONFUSION ABOUT HIS UNDERSTANDING. I WILL GO BEYOND THAT. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. THE AMOUNT OF COST OUT OF POCKET FOR THE CITY
THAT YOU OWE. 1400 AND $.23. >> GIVE HIM A NUMBER OF DAYS TO
PAY. 30 DAYS. >> 30 DAYS. AND THE CITY ASKS IF THESE ARE NOT PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS, THE LIEN AMOUNT REVERTS TO THE ORIGINAL LIEN AMOUNT. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO PAY THE AMOUNTS. WHICH IS A REDUCED AMOUNT FROM WHAT THE CITY RECOMMENDED. THEY CAN COME BACK TO THE AMOUNT THEY ARE RECOMMENDING. WHAT IS THE AMOUNT REDUCE ALONE. RIGHT ON YOUR SCREEN. DO YOU SEE IT ON THE SCREEN IN THE BOTTOM RIGHT? $1420.23? SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IS ALLOWING 30 DAYS TO PAY IT.
YOU'LL RECEIVE A WRITTEN ORDER. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? THANK YOU. DID WE MENTION THE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL?
>> YES WE DO. YES WE DID. >> OKAY, THANK YOU.
[01:30:02]
>> OKAY, THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU.
[B. IDENTIFICATION OF CASES IN COMPLIANCE OR RESCHEDULED]
>> PIECES AND COMPLIANCE ARE RESCHEDULED FROM TODAY'S HEARING. CASE NUMBER 24-482, 2307 AVENUE Q. 24 E- 149, 26 BERNADINO ST. 24-74, 2007, VALENCIA AVENUE. 24-82, 506 QUINCY AVE. HOMES REALTY VENTURES LLC. I THINK THAT SHOULD BE LLC. 24-115 506 QUINCY AVE. HOMES REALTY VENTURES LLC. 24-175, 2308 LLC. 24-175, 2308 CANAL TER. 24 E- 644 3004, DUNBAR STREETS. HOWARD, 24-387, 24 OR THREE AVENUE D , --. 24-342, 1025 AVENUE, ORELLANA AND VARGAS.
24-632, 401 N. 29TH ST., HAYWOOD. 23-1276. 2835 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1. CAPITAL TRUST. 23-494. 1261 BONEFISH PORT.
COLEMAN. 24-265. 936 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1. CRAWL ANGLE PHOTOGRAPHY GROUP. 24-71, 1240 DRIVE, NINE. 23-2114 SOUTH CROSBY PARK, BIRD. 24 E- 731, 601, -- DRIVE. WORK. 24-175.
1003 MAYFLOWER RD., JUST. JUST IN .
>> WE DON'T HAVE ANY PENNY THAT IS NOT UP.?
>> WE HAD AN I.D. THAT DID NOT APPEAR.
>> CORRECT. WE TOLD THEM NOT TO COME.
>> WE TOLD THEM NOT TO COME QUESTION MARK
>> OKAY. CASES REQUIRE A HEARING FOR STATES THAT SHE WANTS 2.12. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE VIOLATORS THROUGH CERTIFIED MAIL. IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED SIDE PLACED IN THE FILE. ON-SITE AND UNCLAIMED, AND AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING WITH THE NOTICE OF HEARING US INTO THE VIOLATOR REGULAR U.S. MAIL. 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, NOTICE HIS PLACED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD IN THE CITY HALL. IT IS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH THE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING. IF THE GREEN CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING, THE POSTING IS COMPLETED IN THE SAME MANNER AS IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED. FOR THE CASE IS NOT MANDATED, BY THE STATES THAT YOU, MAILING OF THE NOTICE ARE HANDLED IN THE SAME MANNER DATED PRIOR. IF IT IS RETURNED UNSIGNED, UNCLAIMED OR NOT RETURNED WITHIN 10 DAYS, A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE BONES ABOARD IN CITY HALL.
>> THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.