[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:09]
THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING OF JULY 11 THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING OF JULY 11, 2024 IS CALLED TO ORDER. IF WE CAN STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE?
>> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
[A. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
>> IF YOU CAN REMAIN STANDING. IF YOU WILL GIVE TESTIMONY.
RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY
PROVIDED WILL BE THE TRUTH? >> YES.
>> THANK YOU. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THE CASE IN CASES
[B. IDENTIFICATION OF CASES IN COMPLIANCE OR RESCHEDULED]
IN COMPLIANCE WERE RESCHEDULED. CASE CHINA SEVEN THIS IS 24-337. 1405 N 25TH ST UNITS 1-6. THAT'LL BE RESCHEDULED.[A. 23-3076 306 Mockingbird Ave Perry R Postlethwaite Miles Keller]
>> OKAY, THANK YOU. FIRST CASE IS 6 AM. 23-376. 306 MOCKINGBIRD AVE. PERRY -- IS THE OWNER.
>> I AM MILES KELLER. THE CITY INSPECTOR AND THE INVESTIGATOR.
FOR CASES 23 3076. 306 MOCKINGBIRD AVE. PERRY R POSTLETHWAITE . THE OWNER. CASE INITIATED ON JANUARY 29, CASE INITIATED ON JANUARY 29, 2024. THE OWNER OF --. 5050 SOUTH SYRACUSE SUITE 1200. DENVER, COLORADO. 237. VIOLATIONS ARE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 105.1. 2020 PERMIT REQUIRED. EFFECTIVE ACTIONS. OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION OF WINDOWS THE FRONT DOOR. SIDING ALONG WITH ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING WORK BEING DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. RECOMMENDATIONS. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS IN THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT IS CLOSED. COMPLY WITH OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. WE INFORMED THE OWNER OF THE MOBILE HOME OF WHAT THEY NEED TO DO TO MOVE THE PERMIT FORWARD ON THREE DIFFERENT OCCASIONS. NO SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED TO DATE.
>> DO YOU HAVE A PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE VIOLATION YOU OBSERVED? ARE THEY DATED AND TIME STAMPED? ARE THE DATES AND
>> CAN YOU SHARE THE PHOTOGRAPHS WITH THE RESPONDENT. HAVE YOU SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPHS, SIR?
>> THE PHOTOGRAPHS ARE DATED DECEMBER 4, 2023. THE CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITY COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE . PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO RESPOND?
>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO RESPOND ?
>> THEY ARE ACCURATE. LAST TIME I WAS HERE I HAD TO GET AN ENGINEER. I GOT AN ENGINEER AND HE DIED.
>> I DON'T REMEMBER. >> WHEN I BROUGHT IT UP LAST TIME YOU GUYS ARE THE ONES THAT TOLD ME THAT HE DIED.
[00:05:03]
>> I DON'T HAVE THE DATE YOU WERE LAST HERE. WHAT HAVE YOU
DONE SINCE TO GET A PERMIT? >> I GOT ANOTHER ENGINEER. I HAVE THE ENGINEERS DRAWINGS. BUT THE TRUTH IS I HAVE NEVER EVER SENT AN EMAIL IN MIND SIRE LIFE. MY WIFE DID AND SHE PASSED AWAY. IT'S ON MY PHONE, THE DRAWINGS. I TALKED TO CECELIA, I BELIEVE? ALL I HAVE TO DO SEND EMAIL WITH THE DRAWINGS. THE DRAWINGS ARE PAID FOR AND EVERYTHING IS DONE. FOR THE DOORS AND WINDOWS. BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO THAT.
I'VE NEVER DONE A DAY IN MY LIFE.
>> CAN WE SYSTEM WITH GETTING HIS APPLICATION AND IF HE IS
UNABLE TO USE EMAIL? >> WE ARE MOVING TOWARDS A PERMIT PLATFORM ON MONDAY. IF YOU WANT TO COME BACK NEXT WEEK, WE CAN ASSIST YOU WITH SOME PERMIT APPLICATIONS IN THE
LOBBY. >> THERE'S ANOTHER THING. I HAVE THE PERMIT AND I PAID FOR THE PERMIT. HE JUST THAT I DON'T HAVE ONE. I DO HAVE A PERMIT. BUT THEY WON'T SUBMIT THE PERMITS BECAUSE THEY SAY I HAVE TO PAY A FINE FOR WORKING WITHOUT A PERMIT? BUT HERE'S THE PROBLEM WITH THAT. THEY GIVE ME THIS PAPER HERE. WHEN I WAS DOWN HERE LAST WEEK. WHEN THEY HAD ME FILL OUT THE PAPERWORK FOR THE PERMIT. AND I THOUGHT THEY WERE ASKING THE PRICE OF WHAT I PAID FOR THE TRAILER. WHICH WAS $30,000. THAT IS NOT THE PRICE OF THE JOB AND WHAT IT'LL COST ME. TO PUT THE WINDOWS BACK IN. I HAVE TO FILL OUT THIS PAPER. BUT IT'S ASKING FOR A D PCR NUMBER. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THAT IS. I HAVE THE PERMIT NUMBER. I HAVE TO GET THE NUMBER UP. ASKING FOR ALL KINDS OF STUFF I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IT IS. I NEED HELP WITH ALL OF IT.
>> IT'S SOMETHING WE CAN ASSIST YOU WITH, YES SIR.
>> I HAVE A HEARING TO LEARN -- LOWER THE $30,000 PRICE POINT OF THE JOB. MY FINE IS NOT AS MUCH IS THE PERMIT WAS. I OVERPAID FOR THE PERMIT. I PAID $490 BECAUSE THE $30,000 I PUT ON THE PERMIT LIBERALS WE TOO MUCH. THAT'S WHY THE BILLS ARE SO MUCH. THEY WERE LOWER IT WITH PEACE PAPER, I GUESS.
>> I UNDERSTAND. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE HEARING HE IS REFERENCING? IT'S A DECISION MADE BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
THAT'S THE FIRST I'M HEARING OF IT. THAT'S CORRECT IF YOU NEED TO REVISE THE VALUATION OF THE PAPERWORK, YOU CAN DO IT THROUGH THE FORM YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU.
>> I'M DOING EVERYTHING YOU HAVE ASKED.
>> HE APPLY FOR THE PERMIT AND IT'S REJECTED IN PLAIN REVIEW.
IT'S COME OUT FOR THE ENGINEER AND ENGINEER DRAWINGS. THEY NEED TO BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION ALONG WITH THE CHANGE
OF VALUATION TO THE PERMITS. >> HE CAN GET ASSISTANCE NEXT
WEEK HE SAID? >> YES, WE CAN ASSIST WITH THAT. FOR THE DRAWINGS ASSIST ON ON YOUR PHONE? ARE THEY ON
>> CAN WE EXTRACT THE DRAWINGS FROM HIS PHONE IF HE COMES IN NEXT WEEK? DOES HE NEED TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO PRINT THEM OR GET THEM ON PAPER FROM THE ENGINEER?
>> YOU TOLD ME I NEED TO EMAIL THEM TO HER.
>> CORRECT. >> MAKE SURE THEY HAVE A STAMP ON THEM. AND THEY WILL BE APPROVED IF THEY ARE CORRECT.
>> DO YOU HAVE A FRIEND OR SOMEBODY THAT CAN HELP YOU SEND
>> DO HAVE A FRIEND? >> I DON'T KNOW ANYBODY , I
JUST MOVED DOWN HERE. >> AT THE LAST HEARING YOU HAD A FRIEND WHO TESTIFIED ON YOUR BEHALF.
>> THAT WAS IN FORT LAUDERDALE. >> OKAY.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, WE'RE CLOSE TO GETTING THESE REVISIONS SUBMITTED. STAFF REQUEST THAT WE PULL DATA TO ALLOW FOR THE SUBMITTAL OF THE REVISION. IT'LL ALLOW FOR THE PERMIT TO BE ISSUED. IF WE CAN CONTINUE THIS UNTIL THE NEXT
HEARING? >> THE ITEM WILL BE CONTINUED TO ALLOW YOU TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS.
>> I THINK I'M DOWN NEXT WEEK.
>> YOU CAN GO UP THERE NOW SINCE ALREADY APPLIED FOR THE PERMITS. STARTING MONDAY IS GOING TO BE FOR NEW APPLICATIONS. I WASN'T RECALLING ALREADY APPLIED FOR A
[00:10:03]
PERMIT WHEN I STATED THAT. YOU CAN GO UP THERE AND SOMEBODY CAN ASSIST YOU WITH THAT. SHE CAN HELP YOU WITH THAT.>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. THE NEXT CASE IS 6E. 24-529. 2801
[E. 24-529 2801 Avenue L Bldg 4-35 SP Pine Creek Village LP Frank Remling]
AVENUE L BUILDING FOUR. SP POND CREEK VILLAGE LP IS THE OWNER.GOOD MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING.
>> I WORK WITH THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE AS A BUILDING INSPECTOR/INVESTIGATOR. THIS CASE NUMBER IS 24-529. 2801 AVENUE L BUILDING 4-35. INITIATED FEBRUARY 26, 2024.
THE OWNER IS SP PINE CREEK VILLAGE LP . 31899 -- STREET SUITE 150 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA , 92675. VIOLATIONS, IPM C30 4.720 21 ROOFS AND DRAINAGE, 305.320 21 INTERIOR SERVICES. ACTIVE ACTIONS ARE, REPLACE AND REPAIR THE ROOF LEAKING INTO THE UNIT AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO THE WATER DAMAGE DRYWALL AND CEILING. RECOMMENDATIONS THE CITY REQUESTED A MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THEY BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO OBTAIN PERMITS, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPILED ALL OF THE PERMIT CONDITIONS.
CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR FIND OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. I WAS CALLED AT THEIR TO DO AN INSPECTION. THEY WERE NOT READY
AT THE TIME. >> YOUR CALL TO DO A
REINSPECTION? ALL RIGHT. >> YOU HAVE PICTURES I HAVE SPOKEN TO THE PROPERTY MANAGER FOR THE HEARING SHOWED THE PICTURES. AND TOLD HER WHAT TO KNOW. TO ARE YOUR PHOTOGRAPHS DATED IN TIMESTAMPS? DO THE DATES AND TIMES ACCURATELY REFLECT THE DAYS YOU WERE THERE IN THE VIOLATIONS YOU OBSERVED?
>> YES THEY DO. TO ALL RIGHT. >> THANK YOU. PHOTOGRAPHS DATED FEBRUARY 22. 2024. FOR PHOTOGRAPHS TOTAL, THE CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITY COMPOSITE EXHIBITS ONE. SIR, MADAM, YOU'VE SEEN THE PHOTOGRAPHS AND DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS GOING INTO EVIDENCE?
>> I SAW THEM AND WE DON'T HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS.
>> ALL RIGHT. >> PHOTOS SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. AND MR. FRANK REMLING, I'M LOOKING AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE INTERIOR OF THE UNIT. WHEN HE WENT BACK TO THE REINSPECTION, WERE YOU
GIVEN ACCESS? >> I NEVER MADE IT, THEY CALLED ME OUT ON THE WAY THERE AND SAID THEY WEREN'T READY.
>> ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> NO, THAT IT APPEARED >> IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND YOUR RELATION TO THE PROPERTY SP PINE CREEK VILLAGE LP.
>> I AM THE MULTISITE MANAGER.
>> I'M THOMAS, REGIONAL PROPERTY MANAGER. I NEED TO
SWEAR IN. >> RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. DO YOU SWEAR AND AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU PROVIDE WILL BE THE TRUTH? TO YES, MA'AM.
>> THANK YOU. >> WHICH ONE OF YOU HAS AUTHORITY TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TODAY? ALL RIGHT. IT'S YOUR TURN TO PRESENT YOUR CASE.
>> YOUR HONOR, I'M ASKING FOR MORE TIME ACCORDING TO THE RECOMMENDATION. WE HAVE SPOKEN WITH THE PROPERTY MANAGER WE ARE ON TRACK TO GET THE NECESSARY QUOTES INTO THE
REMEDIATION REQUIRED. >> THE CITY IS RECOMMENDING
[00:15:01]
THAT THE PERMIT AND THE WORK BE STARTED WITHIN 30 DAYS. IS THATENOUGH TIME? >> PLENTY OF TIME.
>> THAT IS PLENTY OF TIME. ALL RIGHT, THEN. I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT.
AND THEN APPROVAL OF ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AFTER YOU GET THE PERMIT. AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ANY OTHER VIOLATIONS THAT MAY BE DESCRIBED. IF NOT, $100 A DAY
WILL BE ASSESSED. >> YES MA'AM.
>> YOU HAVE A 30 DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL. TO WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLIED TO BUY THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE, YOU NEED TO CONTACT --? THAT IS THE INFORMATION.
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS SIX. 24-668. 3324 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY
[I. 24-668 3324 S US Hwy 1 St. Mary's Hospitality Group LLC Miles Keller]
1. ST. MARY'S HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC IS THE OWNER.>> CASE NUMBER 24-668. 3324 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1, ST.
MARY'S HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC. CASE INITIATED MARCH 12 OF 2024. VIOLATIONS ARE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE RENOVATION WORK BEEN DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT INCLUDING THE REPLACEMENT OF HANDRAILS , RECOMMENDATIONS AS THE CITY REQUESTS IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS, VIOLATORS BE GIVEN THE DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT IS CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH THE PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR FIND OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED.
THE PERMIT FOR THE RENOVATION WORK BEING OBTAINED ACCEPT THE HANDRAILS. NO PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FOR THE HANDRAILS GET.
I DO HAVE PICTURES OF THE VIOLATION.
>> ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHS DATED IN TIMESTAMPS?
>> YES THEY ARE. >> ARE THEY ACCURATE AND ARE THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT VIOLATIONS HE WITNESSED ON THE DATES? TO YES THEY DO. FOR WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE
PHOTOGRAPHS, SIR? >> I AM CURIOUS TO SEE THEM.
>> THANK YOU. I GOT IT. THE CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. MR. KELLER, DO YOU
HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD? >> I DID AN INSPECTION AND HE'S IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING A PERMIT.
>> OKAY. >> IN 30 DAYS, DO YOU THINK THIS CAN BE DONE IN 30 DAYS? TO APPLY FOR THE REVISION ON MONDAY. I RESUBMITTED ANOTHER DOCUMENT TO JANICE YESTERDAY.
IT'S ALREADY BEEN APPLIED FOR.
>> THANK YOU. HOUSEKEEPING. CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE
>> WHAT IS YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO ST. MARY'S HOSPITALITY GROUP
LLC? >> THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. TO DO HAVE AUTHORITY FOR THE OWNER TO BE REPRESENTED HERE?
>> YES I DO. >> THE VIOLATION EXISTS IN THE
VIOLATED BE GIVEN 60 DAYS. >> YOU SAID 30 DAYS. 60 DAYS ENOUGH TIME TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE GET
>> YOU HAVE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMITS APPROVAL FOR ALL
[00:20:03]
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. THEY ARE TO BE DONE EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS EXPIRED. AND CURE ANY OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE WATER. OR $100 A FINE WILL BE ASSESSED. IS A 30 DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL. THANK YOU.>> THANK YOU. >> 6B. CASE 24-262. 2831
[B. 24-262 2831 Reynolds Dr (Pool) Sataya Group LLC Miles Keller]
REYNOLDS DR . SATAYA GROUP LLC IS THE OWNER. THAT'S MILES.MILES KELLER. >> CASE 24-262. 2831 REYNOLDS DR , SATAYA GROUP LLC. INITIATED JANUARY 30 AT 2024.
VIOLATIONS ARE THROUGH AND THROUGH .1 SWIMMING POOLS.
THROUGH A 3.2 ENCLOSURES. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS AND SECURE THE POOL HANDRAILS/LADDER THAT IS LOOSE. NECESSARY REPAIRS TO THE POOL GATE THAT IS NOT LATCH PROPERLY. AND REPAIR AND REPLACE THE POOL FENCE THAT IS BENT AND DAMAGED. RECOMMENDATION. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THEY BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT , OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT IS CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH THE PERMIT CONDITIONS AND COMPLY WITH OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER. NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT. OR FIND OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. NO CONTACTS FOR THE OWNER FOR REINSPECTION.
>> CORRECTIVE ACTIONS INCLUDE TO MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS THAT IS NOT LATCH PROPERLY. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE ACCESS TO
THAT POOL? >> I CIRCLED BACK AROUND THERE.
I BELIEVE LAST THURSDAY. THEY DID HAVE A PADLOCK ON IT.
>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS? YOU'D LIKE
TO SUBMIT AS EVIDENCE? >> I HAVE PICTURES OF THE BENT GATES. THE OTHER ONES HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED. FOR THE ORDER. THIS IS AN ONGOING CASE.
>> THEY ARE SUBMITTED IN A DIFFERENT CASE?
>> THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IT'S HERE. THE ONLY SUBMISSION. DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE IT TO THE NEXT HEARING? DO YOU WANT TO RECALL AT THE END OF THIS HEARING? GIVE HIM TIME TO PRINT
HIS PHOTOS? >> DOES THE PHOTO SHOW THE VIOLATIONS? THOSE TWO PICTURES? THIS IS ONE OF THE CASES THEY
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, I'M NOT GOING TO CONTINUE THIS. MR. KELLER, DID YOU PERSONALLY OBSERVE THAT THE POOL HANDRAIL
>> THEY DO OBSERVE THE POOL GATE DID NOT LATCH PROPERLY? THAT'S YOUR TESTIMONY TODAY? THE CITY WILL MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE DAMAGE FENCE INTO EVIDENCE A CITY COMPOSITE AND EXHIBIT ONE. AND THE CITY WILL RELY ON THE TESTIMONY. MR. KELLER. THE OTHER VIOLATIONS NOT DEPICTED IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS. PHOTO SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS THE CITY'S
EXHIBIT ONE. >> ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD?
[00:25:04]
>> THAT'S ALL I HAVE. >>, THANK YOU. I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATED BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT. OBTAIN APPROVAL OF ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. AND COMPLY WITH ANY OF THE PERMIT CONDITIONS. CURE THE VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER AND , NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT, OR FIND OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED. THERE IS A 30 DAY
RIGHT TO APPEAL. THANK YOU. >> WE WILL SKIP TO CASE 980. 17
[A. 17-898 1450 Bell Avenue TSPN 19 LLC 1450 Bell Ave Owner LLC Shaun Coss]
898, 1415 BELL AVE. 1450 BELL AVE. OWNER LLC ARE THE OWNERS.>> GOOD MORNING, MAGISTRATE. >> GOOD MORNING.
>> I'LL BE PRESENTING THIS CASE, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
>> OKAY. >> CASE NUMBER 17 898 17 8984 1450 BELL AVE. IT IS OWNED BY TSPN 19 LLC. 1450 1450 BELL AVE. OWNER, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33132. INITIATED APRIL 5, 2017.
IT IS HERE TODAY AS A STATUS HEARING. THE VIOLATIONS AT THE PROPERTY. THAT WERE CITED ON THE ORDER DETERMINE A VIOLATION FOR THE CITY ORDINANCE , UNSAFE BUILDING. 5.101 PERMIT REQUIRED. 1.105 POINT WAR EXPIRED PERMIT. COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. IT HAS COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE NUMEROUS TIMES FOR REQUEST FOR EXTENSIONS.
NUMEROUS EXTENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED SINCE THE CASE WAS INITIATED. I BELIEVE THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IS COME IN FRONT OF YOU. TO GIVE YOU A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY, THIS IS A LARGE INDUON IT. ALL OF THE BUILDINGS WERE IN DISREPAIR. THE PROPERTY HAS SINCE CHANGED OWNERSHIP. THE OWNERS ARE , TAKING ACTION TO COMPLY THE CASE BUT ADDITIONAL TIME IS NEEDED. SINCE THE ORDER DETERMINE THE VIOLATION , IT STILL AGAINST PREVIOUS OWNER. STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THAT YOU SET ASIDE THE PREVIOUS ORDER TO DETERMINE A VIOLATION THAT WAS RECORDED AUGUST 4, 2017 IN BOOK 4028 PAGE 514. WE FIND A NEW ORDER DETERMINING VIOLATION. AGAINST THE CURRENT OWNER. WITH THE CURRENT SECTIONS THAT ARE REMAINING A VIOLATION. I DID HAVE A CHANCE TO SPEAK WITH THE CONTRACTOR THIS MORNING FOR THE HEARING. INDICATING THAT HE HAS BEEN DISCUSSING THE PERMITS THAT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED WITH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. I THE REVISIONS WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED. THERE SOME CLARIFICATION THAT NEEDS TO BE MADE. ADDITIONAL TIME IS NEEDED TO BRING THE CASE INTO COMPLIANCE. FOR THAT REASON, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THAT WE PROVIDE 90 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS. AND A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE OBSESSED --
ASSESSED. >> PLEASE CLARIFY. TO ENTER A NEW ORDER CITING THE REVISED ORDINANCES?
>> THAT'S CORRECT. >> ARE YOU ASKING THE MAGISTRATE TO FIND A VIOLATION OR TO REVISE THE PREVIOUS ORDER UPDATED TO CITE THE NEW ORDINANCES?
>> I THINK IT'LL BE CLEANER IF WE SET ASIDE THE PREVIOUS ORDER TO DETERMINE A VIOLATION TO FIND A NEW ORDER PROVIDING A
NEW TIMELINE. >> ARE YOU PREPARED TO PRESENT THE VIOLATIONS AND PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE? DO YOU UNDERSTAND A PREVIOUS ORDER DETERMINING THE PROPERTY WAS OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE AND WAS ENTERED? DO YOU AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY WAS OUT OF CODE?
>> YES, WE DO. SPEAKING WITH MR. SHAUN COSS THIS MORNING, THIS CASE HAS BEEN CONTINUED. AND MAINLY, INDICATIVE OF THE DISREPAIR THAT WAS LEFT OF THE PREVIOUS OWNER. THE NEW OWNERS
[00:30:03]
HAVE GONE TO GREAT EXTENTS AND LENGTHS AND EXPENSE TO CONTINUE THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY INCLUDING SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL. WHICH HAS GONE AND BUILDING PERMIT RENOVATION. APPLICATIONS WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENTS PUTTING BACK IN DECEMBER. THE RENOVATIONS WERE TIED TO A SITE PLAN DISCREPANCY WITH THE PARKING MILLINGS TYPE ORIENTATION. WE SUBMITTED SITE PLANS AND ALL OF IT IS MAINLY FOR RECORD FOR THE NEW OWNER. WE SUBMITTED NEW SITE PLAN APPROVALS WHICH IS CURRENTLY GOING TO THE PCR PROCESS. WE ONLY HAVE ONE DIVISION OF THE CITY WHICH IS ENGINEERING THAT HAS ONE MAIN ISSUE. WHICH IS MILLINGS AND A PARKING LOT. WE ARE TRYING TO OBTAIN A MEETING WITH JACK AND TRACY IN ENGINEERING NEXT WEEK TO DISCUSS THAT. OTHER THAN THAT, WHAT WE INDICATED TO MR. SHAUN COSS THIS MORNING, WE WOULD ENJOY A PERMIT TOMORROW IF WE COULD. WE ARE DOING EVERYTHING WE POTENTIALLY CAN WITHIN RURAL SOUTH FLORIDA. WATER MANAGEMENT. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. THAT TOOK EIGHT MONTHS FINALLY TO PAST THAT HURDLE. WE TURNED THE DOCUMENTATION WE HAVE TO THE CITY. TO GET BACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION. DO WE ACCEPT THE FACT THE PROPERTY WAS IN VIOLATION? YES. WE HAD A ROOF ISSUE, UNSAFE ROOF ISSUE I PROVIDED PICTURES ON AN APARTMENT WE DEMOED THE ROOF.IT IS NOW SAFE AND WE HAD A REMOVAL OF INDUSTRIAL BAYLOR.
COMPOSTING BAYLOR THAT HAS BEEN UNDERTAKEN. WE PROVIDED EVIDENCE OF THAT. OTHER THAN WAVING A FLAG SAYING WE ARE READY TO GO. THAT IS WHERE WE ARE AT. SPEAKING THIS MORNING, WE HOPE WITHIN 90 DAYS WE CAN GET THROUGH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND THE D PCR PROCESS WILL BE APPROVED. WE HAVE NECESSARY ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS. FROM A SITE PLAN SET STANDPOINT. ALL BUT ONE IS CLERICAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE THAT CAN BE SOLVED WITH A RESUBMISSION. THAT IS US IN A
NUTSHELL. >> WHAT IS YOUR NAME AND YOUR
RELATIONSHIP? >> MY NAME IS SCOTT HOLMES. ON THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER'S REP FOR THE PROJECT.
>> I'M ONE OF THE OWNERS AND I REPRESENT TSPN 19 LLC. I ALSO REPRESENT TSPN 19 LLC ONE AT MY SIDE IS TSPN 19 LLC.
>> THEY DON'T OPPOSE THE ENTRY OF A NEW ORDER. YOU RECOMMEND
90 DAYS? >> SET ASIDE THE PREVIOUS ORDER UNDER THE OLD OWNERSHIP. ENTER ANY ORDER TODAY THAT STARTS THE TIMELINE TODAY WITH 90 DAYS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT AND COMPLETE EVERYTHING. WHAT ELSE? 90 DAYS HE THINKS SHOULD BE
OKAY? >> WOULD ENJOY IF WE COULD. WE HAVE TO GET PAST A COUPLE IN ONE DEPARTMENT. AFTER THAT WE
ARE READY TO GO. >> THE ORDER WILL SAY 90 DAYS.
>> WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT THAT BASE ON THE NEXT 90 DAYS, A VERY OPEN LINE OF COMMUNICATION WILL TAKE PLACE. AND INVITES TO INSPECTORS OF NECESSARY TO COME OUT AND WITNESS PROGRESS OR ANYTHING THAT WE NEED. WE HAVE NO ISSUES WHATSOEVER. WOULD LIKE TO MOVE AS FAR AWAY FROM MR. KATZ, THE PREVIOUS OWNER AS WE COULD AND STAND ON OUR OWN.
>> TO CLARIFY, IS IT THE STANDARD ORDER THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 90 DAYS TO OBTAIN PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS? UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE OF THE VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT? OR A FINE ? OVER $100 A DAY BE OBSESSED -- ASSESSED?
>> THERE'S A 30 DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL.
>> ONE FINAL THING. WE WOULD LIKE TO, AS OUR SIDE WOULD LIKE TO PUBLICLY COMMAND MR. COSTS, THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
[00:35:03]
PLANNING DEPARTMENT. TO GET TO THE POINT WITH THE CHALLENGING PROJECT. WE THANK EVERYBODY WHO WAS HERE AND WANT TO CONTINUE THE RELATIONSHIP. THANK YOU SO MUCH.>> YEAH. >> THE NEXT CASE WILL BE EIGHT
[B. 23-1642 2005 Avenue P Henri, Raphael H Shaun Coss]
TO BE. 23-1642. 2005 AVENUE P. RAPHAEL HENRY IS THE OWNER.>> GOOD MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, THE CASE IS HERE FOR THE LIEN REDUCTION.
23-1642 23-16424 2005 AVENUE P. OWNED BY RAPHAEL HENRY. OF 1251 29TH 1251 29TH TER. 1251 29TH TER., MIAMI BEACH, FL, 33 179.
INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE 309.1 INFESTATION. 304.7 % DRAINAGE. 504.1 GEN. 301.132 OPENABLE WINDOWS. THE REAL 4.18 DOORS, 605.1 INSULATION, 70 4.2.1.2 GLANDS. THIS CAME BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE OCTOBER 18 THIS CAME BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE OCTOBER 18, 2023. AN AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED JANUARY 22, 2024. ORDER ASSESSING FINE AND IMPOSING THE LIEN WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 21, 2024 AND IT CAME COMPLAINTS MAY 31, 2024. STAFF HAS CALCULATED THE ADMINISTRATIVE COST IN THE CASE. 2B $1055.05. THERE ARE FIVE CRITERIA TO CONSIDER FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE LIEN. WHEN THE REQUESTING PARTY IN THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VIOLATIONS THAT RESULTED IN THE LIEN. WHETHER THE REQUESTED PARTY IS ESTABLISHING THE EXISTENCE OF EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES THAT PREVENT THE TIMELY COMPLIANCE AND ANY EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES. THE MINIMUM ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW AMOUNT PROVIDING THE RULE 5.4 B1. TO BE DETERMINED THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATES. WHETHER THERE IS A CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTION ON THE PROPERTY AND ANY OTHER PROPERTY UNDER THE COMMON OWNERSHIP THERE WAS ONE ACTIVE CASE. 4. TYPE OF LIEN REDUCTIONS REQUESTED -- SORRY. LIEN REDUCTIONS GRANTED FOR THE PROPERTY AND ANY OTHER PROPERTY UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP WITHIN THE PAST 24 MONTHS. NONE ON RECORD. WHETHER GRANTING REDUCTIONS IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY TO BE DETERMINED BY THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
>> DOES THE CITY HAVE A RECOMMENDATION AS TO THE
REDUCTION? >> TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF LIEN $1055.05. INCLUDES $250 APPLICATION FEE.
>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING? CAN YOU STATE YOUR
NAME FOR THE RECORD. >> RAPHAEL HENRY.
>> YOU HAVE BEEN SWORN? >> YES.
>> I DON'T KNOW THAT HE HAS. HAS HE BEEN SWORN?
>> WERE YOU PRESENT FOR THE SWEARING?
>> YES. OKAY. GO AHEAD. DID YOU WANT TO ADD ANYTHING?
>> I'M OKAY WITH IT. >> OKAY. THE AMOUNT OF $1055 WILL BE THE AMOUNT YOU ARE REDUCED TO?
>> RIGHT. >> DO YOU NEED 30 DAYS TO PAY
THAT OR MORE? >> 60 DAYS IS ACCEPTABLE.
THAT'S THE STANDARD AMOUNT OF TIME.
>> 60 DAYS IS ENOUGH TO PAY. >> THE ORDER BE INCLUDED IN THE ACTUAL DATE THAT MONEY NEEDS TO BE PAID. FOR CLARIFICATION UNDER NEW RULES. I SUGGEST SEPTEMBER 11. APPROXIMATELY 60 DAYS FROM TODAY. SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 --.
>> IT IS TO BE PAID BY SEPTEMBER 11 AND WILL GIVE THEM
[00:40:03]
A FIRM DEADLINE. >> IS IT WITH REVERSION OR
WITHOUT REVERSION? >> TYPICALLY, IF YOU FAIL TO PAY THE AMOUNT YOU HAVE AGREED TO PAY WITHIN THE 60 DAYS, THE AMOUNT YOU OWE WILL REFER TO THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT THAT WAS OWED. I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH THAT IS, SHAWN?
>> THE AMOUNT WAS 19,500 THE AMOUNT WAS $19,530.
>> $19,000 PLUS. THE CITY REQUESTS A REVERSION IF IT IS
UNPAID. >> YOU HAVE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 11 TO MAKE SURE IT DOESN'T REVERT TO THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT.
>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. >> I WILL SEND YOU A COPY.
[A. 23-148 705 S 29th St Unit 12C Orange Apartments LLC Shaun Coss]
>> WE WILL DO EIGHT A. 23-148 705 S. 29TH ST. UNIT 12 C.
ORANGE APARTMENTS LLC IS THE OWNER.
>> THIS IS CASE 23 E- 148 THIS IS CASE 23 E- 1484 705 S 29TH ST UNIT 12C÷. PROPERTY IS OWNED BY ORANGE APARTMENTS LLC. 54 OR 3 WEST GRACE ST., TAMPA, FL, 33609. PERMIT REQUIRED.
INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE 305.3 INTERIOR SURFACES. IT CAME BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MAY 17 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE 305.3 INTERIOR SURFACES. IT CAME BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MAY 17, 2023 AND DETERMINED THAT A VIOLATION WAS HAD. 60 DAY EXTENSION WAS GRANTED. JULY 20, 2023. AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE, OCTOBER 10, 2023. ORDER APPROVING RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME NOVEMBER 21, 2023. IN ORDER ASSESSING FINE AND IMPOSING LIEN WAS FAIRBURY 20TH, 2024. IT WAS RECORDED, AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE, A SECOND, 2024. $50 IN RECORDING FEES. WE CALCULATED THE MINISTER THE COST IN THIS CASE TO BE $1265.05. HERE ARE FIVE CRITERIA TO CONSIDER FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE LIEN. WHETHER THE REQUESTING PARTY IS THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ORIGINAL VIOLATION THAT RESULTED IN THE LIEN. IT SAYS NO ON THE SUMMARY SHEETS. BUT FOR CLARITY, THE OWNERSHIP REMAINS THE SAME. THEY'RE THE SAME OWNERS THE VIOLATOR. THE REQUEST FOR REDUCTION INDICATED THAT THE VIOLATION OCCURRED UNDER PREVIOUS PROPERTY MANAGERS. THAT IS BEING CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE REDUCTION. NUMBER TWO. WHETHER THE REQUESTING PARTY ESTABLISHES THE EXISTING OF EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES THAT PREVENT ATOMIC COMPLIANCE OR ANY OTHER EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCE TO SUPPORT THE REDUCTION BELOW THE MINIMUM ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW AMOUNT PROVIDED IN SPECIAL MAGISTRATE RULE 5.4 B1. TO BE DETERMINED BY THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATES. WHETHER THERE IS A CURRENT CODE ENFORCEMENT ACT ON THE PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY UNDER THE OWNERSHIP. THERE AE THREE ACTIVE CASES. THAT TYPE OF LIEN REDUCTIONS GRANTED FOR THE PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP WITHIN THE PAST 24 MONTHS THERE ARE NONE ON RECORD. WHETHER GRANTING THE REDUCTION IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY THAT'LL BE DETERMINED BY THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATES. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS WE REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF THE LIEN TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE COST OF $1265.05. PAYABLE WITHIN 60 DAYS AND FAILURE TO PAY THE AMOUNT OF THE LIEN WOULD REFER BACK TO THE FULL AMOUNT.
>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING?
>> NO, YOUR HONOR, THANK YOU. >> I WOULD FIND THE LIEN IS REDUCED TO $1065.05 ANY HAVE 65 -- 60 DAYS TO PAY IT. 60 DAYS
BEING SEPTEMBER. >> THE DATE IS SEPTEMBER 11, 2024. IF NOT PAID BY THE DATE, IT REVERTS BACK TO THE ORIGINAL
[00:45:03]
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> YOU CAN STAY.
[C. 23-2225 1109 N 27th St Bldg 9-72 SP Pine Creek Village LP Shaun Coss]
>> ALL RIGHT, YES. >> ETSY, CASE 23 E- 2225. 1109 N. 27TH ST., SPIRIT 972 , SP PINE CREEK VILLAGE LP IS THE
OWNER. >> 1109 N. 27TH ST. BUILDING NINE UNIT 72. PROPERTY OWNER IS SP PINE CREEK VILLAGE LP .
SUITE 150 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, 92673.
INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE 604 THREE.
305.3 INTERIOR SERVICES. 502.1 DWELLING UNITS. IT CAME BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE NOVEMBER 21, 2023 NO ORDER DETERMINED THE VIOLATION WAS ENTERED. AN AFFIDAVIT STARTING DEFIANCE RECORDED MARCH 8, 2024. IT WAS RECORDED MAY 15, 2024. IN ORDER ASSESSING THE FINE AND LIEN MAY 1, 2024. WAS RECORDED STOPPING THE FINES ON MAY 28, 2024. THE AMOUNT OF THE FINES WAS EIGHT OF THE FINES WAS $8140 WITH $40 IN RECORDING FEES. THIS CALCULATED THE COST IN THIS CASE TO BE ONE THOUSAND $304.55. THERE ARE FIVE CRITERIA TO CONSIDER FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE LIEN. WHETHER THE REQUESTING PARTY IS THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ORIGINAL VIOLATION RESULTING IN THE LIEN. THE SUMMARY SHEET SAYS NO DUE TO THE PROPERTY MANAGING CHANGING THE PROPERTY. BUT THE OWNER IS THE SAME.
WHETHER THE REQUESTING PARTY HAS ESTABLISHED THE EXISTENCE OF EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES THAT PREVENT ATOMIC COMPLIANCE AND/OR ANY EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES SUPPORTING THE REDUCTION BELOW THE MINIMUM ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW AMOUNTS PROVIDED IN THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE RULE 5.4 B1 DETERMINED BY THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATES. WHETHER THERE IS A CURRENT CODE ENFORCEMENT OF ACTION ON THE PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP. THERE ARE 11 ACTIVE CASES. THE TYPE AND NUMBER OF LIEN REDUCTIONS GRANTED FOR THE PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP IN THE PAST 24 MONTHS AND THERE ARE NONE ON RECORD. WHETHER GRANTING THE REDUCTIONS IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY.
THAT'LL BE DETERMINED BY THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE LATE $1204.55.
PAYABLE WITHIN 60 DAYS AND FAILURE TO PAY WITHIN THE 60 DAYS THE AMOUNT OF LIEN REVERTS BACK TO THE FULL AMOUNT.
>> NO FURTHER. >> I ORDER THE AMOUNT OF $1304.55 IS DUE AND PAYABLE BY SEPTEMBER 11, 2024. IF NOT PAID BY THE DATE AND WILL REVERT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT.
[D. 23-2645 2805 Ave L Bldg 2 SP Pine Creek Village LP Shaun Coss]
>> I UNDERSTAND, THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU.
>> AND WE WILL HAVE 8D. 23-2645 2805 AVENUE OUTBUILDING . AND SP PINE CREEK VILLAGE LP IS THE OWNER.
>> THIS IS CASE 23-2 605 23-26054 --. OWNED BY SP PINE CREEK VILLAGE LP. SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675. THE INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE 304.6 EXTERIOR WALLS. IT CAME BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE GENERATES 12 2024. IN THE ORDER DETERMINING VIOLATION WAS ENTERED. AN AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED MARCH 28, 2024. IN ORDER ASSESSING FINE AND IMPOSING LIEN RECORDED MAY 1, 2024. IT WAS SOMETHING FINES ON MAY 28, 2024. THE CALCULATED INITIATIVE COST IN THIS CASE.
TO BE $1052.95. THERE ARE FIVE CRITERIA TO CONSIDER FOR THE REDUCTION OF THIS LIEN. WHETHER THE REQUESTING PARTY IS THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ORIGINAL VIOLATION RESULTING IN THE LIEN. THE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DID CHANGE. BUT THE OWNER REMAINS THE SAME. WHETHER THE REQUESTING PARTY HAS
[00:50:01]
ESTABLISHED EXISTING OF EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES THAT PREVENTED TIME THE COMPLAINT AND/OR ANY EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES THAT SUPPORT THE REDUCTION BELOW THE MINIMUM ENEMA STRATA REVIEW AMOUNTS PROVIDED IN SPECIAL MAGISTRATE RULE 5.4 B1. TO BE DETERMINED BY THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATES.WHETHER THERE IS A CURRENT CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTION ON THE PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP. THERE ARE 11 ACTIVE CASES. THE TYPE AND NUMBER OF LIEN REDUCTIONS GRANTED FOR THIS PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY UNDER COMMON OWNERSHIP IN THE PAST 24 MONTHS. NONE ON RECORD. WHETHER GRANTING OF THE REDUCTION IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY TO BE DETERMINED BY THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THE RECOMMENDATION.
WE REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF THE LIEN TO $1052.95 PAYABLE WITHIN 60 DAYS. FAILURE TO PAY, THE AMOUNT OF THE LIEN WILL REVERT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT OF $6140 .
>> NOTHING FURTHER TO ADD. >> I FIND THE LIEN WILL BE REDUCED TO $1002.95 PAYABLE BY SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 OR IT'LL BE REVERTED BACK TO THE ORIGINAL LIEN AMOUNT.
>> NOW YOU ALL ARE DONE. WE WILL GO BACK SIX TO SEE.
[C. 24-607 2831 Reynolds Dr (Spa) Sataya Group LLC Joel Smith]
24-607. 2831 REYNOLDS DR. AND SATAYA GROUP LLC IS THE OWNER.>> GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS JOEL SMITH. BUILDING INSPECTOR/INVESTIGATOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. TODAY WE HAVE CASE NUMBER 24-607. 2831 REYNOLDS DR FOR THE SPA, SATAYA GROUP LLC . CASE INITIATED MARCH 4, 2024. AND THE VIOLATION IS IP MC 303.1 SWIMMING POOLS. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, REPAIR OR REPLACE THE LOOSE HANDRAIL FOR THE SPA/HOTEL. RECOMMENDATION. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. AS OF NOW THERE HASN'T BEEN ANY CONTACT FROM THE OWNER OR ANY REINSPECTION? AND I DO HAVE PICTURES OF THE HANDRAIL .
>> ALL RIGHT. ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHS DATED IN TIMESTAMP?
>> NO, MA'AM. AT THE TIME A STAFF IS NOT WORKING.
>> ALL RIGHT. DID YOU PERSONALLY VISIT THIS PROPERTY?
>> TWO 2924. 2/29/24. >> DID YOU TAKE THE PHOTOGRAPHS
>> DID YOU CHECK THE HANDRAIL TO SEE IF IT WAS SECURE? YOU
PHYSICALLY SHOOK THE HANDRAIL? >> I PUT MY HAND ON AND I TOUCHED IT. FOR THE CITY WILL MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE A CITY'S COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. PHOTOGRAPHS WILL BE ENTERED A CITY'S COMPOSITE ONE.
>> THEY HAD A SIGN ON IT. ANYTHING ELSE? I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS IN THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND OBTAIN APPROVAL OF ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS CLOSED. COMPLY WITH THE PERMIT CONDITIONS AND ANY OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN ORDER NOT REQUIRING THE PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. THERE IS A 30 DAY
[00:55:02]
RIGHT TO APPEAL. >> WE HAVE 60 IS THE NEXT CASE
[D. 24-495 2302 Sunrise Blvd 2-204 Gross, Gail Kevin Young]
24 E- 185, 2302 SUNRISE BLVD. 2-204 IS THE UNIT. GAIL GROSSEIS THE OWNER. >> GOOD MORNING, I AM KEVIN YOUNG. INSPECTOR INVESTIGATOR FOR THE CITY. 24-495 2302 SUNRISE 24-495 2302 SUNRISE BLVD. GAIL P GROSS IS THE OWNER. 2302 2302 SUNRISE BLVD. VIOLATIONS ARE SPC 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED. 111.1 .3 STRUCTURE UNFIT FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY. 11 1.1.5 DANGER STRUCTURE OR PREMISES. 305.3 INTERIOR SERVICES. 604.1. FACILITIES REQUIRED. 604.3. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM HAZARDS. 604.3 .1. ABATEMENT OF ELECTRIC HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER EXPOSURE. 60 4.3.1.1 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 60 4.3.2.1 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT REPAIR AND REPLACE ALL FIRE DAMAGED WIRING, ELECTRICAL FIXTURES, DRYWALL FRAMING AND ANY OTHER DAMAGE NOT READILY SEEN. ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE WILL REQUIRE SIGNED AND SEALED REPAIR PLANS DESIGNED BY REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. IT HAS BEEN NO PERMIT FOR THE PAPERWORK. I HAVE PICTURES.
>> ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHS DATED IN TIMESTAMP? DO THEY DEPICT THE VIOLATION YOU OBSERVED ON THAT DATE? THANK YOU.
>> ALL THE PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN ON FEBRUARY 15? THE CITY MOVES THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.
PHOTOGRAPHS SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE
EXHIBIT ONE. >> HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONTACT WITH THE OWNER AND FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE OWNER?
>> THE DAY I WENT WAS THE ONLY TIME I SPOKE TO THE LADIES DAUGHTER WHO WAS GETTING HER VALUABLES OUT. THE LADY THAT LIVED THERE WENT TO THE HOSPITAL I DON'T KNOW WHERE
SHE IS AT. >> OKAY. ADAM COOK CAN WE CONFIRM THAT THE OWNER ADDRESS IS STILL LISTED IN THE PROPERTY? RECORDS AT 2302 SUNRISE BLVD. APARTMENT RECORDS AT 2302 SUNRISE BLVD., APT. 204?
>> THE NOTICE IS WE RUN ANOTHER PROPERTY CARD FOR THE APPRAISER. HAVE ANY OF THE NOTICES BEEN RETURNED AS UNDELIVERABLE? HAVE THEY BEEN RETURNED AS UNDELIVERABLE? DO YOU HAVE THE FOLDER? THE PICTURE POSTED IS NOT ON THERE.
>> YOU POSTED THE PROPERTY AS WELL?
>> YES. IT HASN'T BEEN RETURNED AS UNDELIVERABLE BUT WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED IT BACK. IT WAS SENT AS REGULAR MAIL AND BEEN POSTED IS THE PROPERTY. THE NOTICE WAS SENT A CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAIL. THE PROPERTY WAS POSTED. YOU HAVE NOT RECEIVED THE GREEN CARD OR THE ENVELOPE OF THE REGULAR MAIL BACK AS UNDELIVERABLE. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING FURTHER? ALL RIGHT. IT EXISTS IN THE VIOLATOR HAS 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL OF ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST
[01:00:02]
EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT IS CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ANY PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR FIND OF $100 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. THERE'S A 30 DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL.[G. 24-640 2306 Delaware Ave Unit A IQI 15820-39 LLC Anthony Jetmore]
>> THANK YOU. THE NEXT CASE IS 6G. 24-640. 2306 DELAWARE AVE.
UNIT A. IQI15820 -39 LLC IS THE OWNER.
>> HI. MY NAME IS ANTHONY JACK MOORE. AN INVESTIGATOR AN INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. SUBJECT IS 24-640. 2306 DEVELOPER AVE. UNIT A. CASES INITIATED ARCH EIGHT, 2024.
OWNER IS IQI 15820-39 LLC . 8152 NW. 14TH PL., MIAMI, FL.
VIOLATION IS 111.1 .1 UNSAFE STRUCTURES. 11 1.1.5 DANGER STRUCTURE OR PREMISES. 304.1 EXTERIOR STRUCTURE. GENERAL.
304.1 .1 UNSAFE CONDITIONS. 304.7 GROUPS AND DRAINAGE.
304.13 WINDOW, SKYLIGHT AND DOOR FRAMES. 304.1 3.1 , GLAZING. GEN. THREE 305.1, GEN. 305.1 .1 UNSAFE CONDITIONS.
305.3 , INTERIOR SERVICES. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT REPAIR AND REPLACE ALL FIRE DAMAGED WIRING, ELECTRICAL FIXTURES DRYWALL, SOFFIT AND FASCIA. ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE WILL REQUIRE SIGNED AND SEALED REPAIR PLANS DESIGNED BY A REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. IF YOU FIND IT EXISTS THE VIOLET IS GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND APPROVALS FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH THE PERMIT CONDITION AND CURE THE VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY BE ASSESSED THIS IS OBSESSED.
THERE IS A PENDING RESIDENTIAL REPAIR PERMIT PENDING REVIEW.
SUBMITTING 528 24 AND IT WAS REJECTED IN BUILDING ON ELECTRICAL REVIEW ON 7/9/2020 .
>> YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> I DID.
>> ARE THEY DATED IN TIMESTAMP? THEY ARE NOT. CAN SOMEBODY PHOTOGRAPHS WERE TAKEN CUSTOMER -- CAN YOU TELL ME THE DATE
THEY WERE TAKEN? >> MARCH 8, 2024. TO DO THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT VIOLATIONS YOU OBSERVED ON MARCH 8 ON
MARCH 8, 2024? >> WE MOVE THESE INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. THANK YOU. PHOTOGRAPHS SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.
>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT'S THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT.
OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY WILL BE OBSESSED -- ASSESSED. THERE'S A 30 DAY
[01:05:01]
RIGHT TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU.
[H. 24-641 2306 Delaware Ave Unit B IQI 15820-39 LLC Anthony Jetmore]
>> OKAY. WE WILL CONSIDER THE B SIDE OF THIS DUPLEX. 24-641.
2306 DELAWARE AVE. UNIT B. IQI 15820-39 LLC IS THE OWNER.
24-641 2306 DELAWARE AVE. UNIT B. INITIATED MARCH 8, 2024, THE OWNER IS IQI 15820-39 LLC . 8152 NW. 14TH PL. 8152 NW. 14TH PL., MIAMI, FL. 111.1 .1 UNSAFE STRUCTURES. 11 1.1.5 DANGER STRUCTURE OR PREMISE. 304.1 EXTERIOR STRUCTURE, GEN. 304.1 .1, UNSAFE CONDITIONS. 304.7 RECENT DRAINAGE. 304.13 WINDOWS, SKYLIGHT AND DOOR FRAMES. 304.1 3.1 GLAZING.
305.1 GEN. 305.1 .1 UNSAFE CONDITIONS. 305.3 INTERIOR SURFACES. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS. OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR/REPLACE ALL FIRE DAMAGED WIRING, ELECTRICAL FIXTURES DRYWALL, SOFFIT AND FASCIA. ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE WILL REQUIRE SIGNED AND SEALED REPAIR PLANS DESIGNED BY REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. RECOMMENDATIONS. THE CITY REQUEST THAT OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THEY BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT , OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR FIND OF $100 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. THEY HAVE BEEN ISSUED FOR THE ROOF AND AC. A PENDING RESIDENTIAL REPAIR PERMIT PENDING AND REVIEW. FIVE 2824. IT WAS REJECTED IN THE BUILDING AND ELECTRICAL REVIEW ON 7/9/2024.
>> DO YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS? WHAT DATES WERE THEY TAKEN?
>> MARCH 8, 2024. >> DO THEY DEPICT VIOLATIONS
YOU OBSERVED ON MARCH 8, 2024? >> THEY DO.
>> THE CITY MOVES PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. PHOTOGRAPHS SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE.
>> I FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS IN THE CITY, VIOLATOR GIVEN 60 DAYS TO BE GIVEN A PERMIT AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. THERE IS A 30 DAY RIGHT TO APPEAL.
>> WE WILL DO 6J. 24-714. 706 S. 13TH ST. AVILA, HONORIA &
[J. 24-714 706 S 13th St Avila, Honoria & Villa, Reyna Logan Winn]
VILLA, REYNA ARE THE OWNERS. >> MY NAME IS LOGAN WINN. THE INVESTIGATOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. 24-714 24-714706 S. 13TH ST. INITIATED MARCH 21, 2024. THE OWNERS ARE AVILA, HONORIA & VILLA, REYNA OF 706 S. 13TH ST. 34950. VIOLATIONS ARE 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED. OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE WINDOWS INSTALLED ON THE SIDING REPLACED WITHOUT A PERMIT. THE CITY REQUESTS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, VIOLET IS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, AND APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS AND CURE THE VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR FIND BE ASSESSED. THERE ARE NO PERMITS FOR THE WORK AS OF NOW.
[01:10:03]
I DID HAVE THE PICTURES AS WELL.>> ARE THEY DATED IN TIMESTAMP? ALL RIGHT. DO THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT VIOLATIONS YOU OBSERVED ON THE DATE?
>> YES THEY DO. >> THEY MOVE THE PHOTOGRAPHS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE.
>> PHOTOGRAPHS SUBMITTED WILL BE ENTERED AS CITIES COMPOSITE
ONE. ANYTHING ELSE? >> NOW. TO THE VIOLATION EXISTS IN THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND COMPLY WITH THE PERMIT CONDITIONS AND HAVE INSPECTIONS EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT IS CLOSED. CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $100 A DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. THERE IS A 30 DAY
[F. 24-536 1713 Bayshore Dr Cheshier, George Kevin Young]
RIGHT TO APPEAL. >> THANK YOU.
>> THE NEXT CASE IS THE CALLING. SUCCESS. 24 E- 536 1713 24 E- 536 1713 BAYSHORE DR. AND GEORGE CHESHIRE IS THE OWNER. I'LL BE CALLING ELLEN A COLLAR. ELLEN O CONNOR.
>> HELLO? >> MISS O'CONNOR? THIS IS ELIZABETH WITH THE CITY FORT PIERCE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CAN
YOU HEAR ME OKAY? >> YES. FOR YOU ARE AN AUDIO ATTENDANCE OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING AND ANY TO
SWEAR YOU AND FOR TESTIMONY. >> OKAY.
>> RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
>> ELLEN O'CONNOR. >> DO YOU SWEAR THE TESTIMONY
PROVIDED WILL BE THE TRUTH? >> YES I DO.
>> THE CITY WILL PRESENT ITS CASE AND YOU'LL HAVE A CHANCE
>> THANK YOU. >> I'M SORRY, BEFORE WE PROCEED, MISS O'CONNOR, ARE YOU THE OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY?
>> NOW. >> THIS IS THE CITY ATTORNEY .
DO YOU HAVE WRITTEN PERMISSION TO REPRESENT THE OWNER AND THE
HEARING TODAY? >> NOW. I ASKED FOR THE FORMS NECESSARY AND WAS PROVIDED WITH IT DID NOT CALL FOR THE OWNERS SIGNATURE NO SURPRISE THAT THAT.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE UNDER THE RULES WE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE WRITTEN PERMISSION BY THE OWNER FOR A REPRESENTATIVE TO APPEAR.
SO THE CITY WILL ASK TINA THE HEARING FOR 30 DAYS UNTIL THE
NEXT HEARING DATES. >> A VERBAL WILL NOT WORK?
>> NO, MA'AM. >> OKAY. I HAVE BEEN CALLING ON THIS AND GOTNO INFORMATION, EVER. IF I WOULD'VE HAD IT ALL DONE, IF I WAS TOLD THAT, BUT I APPRECIATE IT. I'LL SEE YOU IN
30 DAYS. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. PITCH
[B. 23-263 2400 S Ocean Dr Bldg 2300 Catamaran I Inc. Shaun Coss]
>> THE LAST CASE THIS MORNING WILL BE NINE TO BE. 23-262 2400 SOUTH OCEAN DR. BUILDING 2300 AND WE WILL CALL THE ATTORNEY,
LAWRENCE SCHWARTZ FELT . >> THE MESSAGES FROM -- COMMUNICATIONS. THE NUMBER DIALED IS UNAVAILABLE. PLEASE CHECK YOUR PARTY'S EXTENSION. THANK YOU. WE'RE SORRY. YOU
[01:15:17]
MUST FIRST STYLE --. >> I DIALED THE ONE THE FIRST TIME I DIALED. I TRIED IT WITHOUT THE WIND. THIS IS THE NUMBER SHE EMAILED THIS MORNING. I CAN TRY AGAIN. I HAVE AN ALTERNATIVE NUMBER FOR THE OFFICE. I BELIEVE IT IS.
>> DO YOU NEED THE NUMBER FOR HER OFFICE?
>> I HAVE IT HERE. I JUST TRIED THE NUMBER SHE EMAILED TO ME THIS MORNING. BUT I CAN TRY THE ALTERNATIVE NUMBER AS WELL.
THAT SHE PROVIDED ON HER ORIGINAL TELEPHONIC REQUEST.
>> LET'S TRY THE NUMBER. >> YOU HAVE REACHED THE LAW OFFICE OF --. A PORTION INVOLVES THE COLLECTION OF DATA AND ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE.
PLEASE HOLD FOR A RECEPTIONIST.
>> THIS MORNING. >> MAY YOU SPEAK WITH LAUREN
>> ELIZABETH WITH THE CITY FORT PIERCE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN A SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING. WE ARE TRYING TO REACH HER.
>> ONE MOMENT. >> THIS IS LAUREN.
>> THIS IS ELIZABETH WITH THE CITY FORT PIERCE BUILDING DEPARTMENT CALLING YOU REGARDING CASE 23 E- 263-2400 CASE 23 E- 263 2400 SOUTH OCEAN DR. BUILDING 2300.
>> THANK YOU. >> YOU ARE AN AUDIO ATTENDANCE OF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING.
>> PERFECT. >> THIS IS CASE 23-2634 2400 SOUTH OCEAN DR. BUILDING 2300. THE PROPERTIES OWNED BY CATAMARAN I INC. OF 835 20TH PL. 835 20TH PL., FERRO BEACH, FLORIDA 835 20TH PL., FERRO BEACH, FL 32960. VIOLATIONS ARE UNSAFE CONDITIONS, 306.1 .1 UNSAFE CONDITIONS. 309.1 INFESTATION AND SBC 105.1 PERMIT REQUIRED. IT CAME BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE MARCH 22 PERMIT REQUIRED. IT CAME BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE MARCH 22, 2023 IN THE ORDER DETERMINED THE VIOLATION WAS ENTERED. A 90 DAY EXTENSION WAS PROVIDED MAY 30, 23. AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE STARTED AND WAS RECORDED AUGUST 29, 2023. IN ORDER TO APPROVE THE RESPONDENTS REQUEST FOR TIME, STOPPING THE FINES WAS ORDERED OCTOBER 18, 2023. AN AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WE STARTING TO FIND WAS RECORDED JANUARY 24, 2024. ORDER APPROVING THE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME STOPPING THE FIND AND WAS RECORDED APRIL 12, 2024. SINCE THAT TIME THE FINES EVER MADE STAYED SINCE THE LAST EXTENSION THAT WAS GRANTED. THE PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE APPLIED FOR A PERMIT. THE FIRST APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED APRIL 16, 2024. APPLICATIONS INITIALLY REJECTED FOR NOT BEING COMPLIANT WITH MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. REVISIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AND REVISIONS WERE APPROVED. THE PERMIT WAS READY TO BE ISSUED WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS. AND ONE BEING THE CONTRACTOR THAT HAS APPLIED FOR THE PERMIT IS NOT PROPERTY LICENSED FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK.
IT'S BEEN SAID NUMEROUS TIMES DURING THE COURSE OF THIS CASE THAT A ROOFING CONTRACTOR CANNOT PERFORM TRUST REPAIRS.
TWO SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED TO SEPARATE CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED. THAT WAS INITIALLY TO TRY TO HELP THEM NAVIGATE AND YES THE ROOF IS BEING REPLACED BY REFERRAL.
BUT THE TRUST IS SHOULD BE REPLACED AT THE SAME TIME IN THE SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED IN THE SUBCONTRACT IS REQUIRED TO THE CAN COORDINATE THAT AMONGST THEMSELVES. THAT WAS NOT DONE AND REALIZED DOING THE FINAL CHECK PROCESS OF THE PERMIT THAT IT REFERRED DID IN FACT APPLY FOR THE TRUST REPAIR
[01:20:02]
PERMIT WHICH IS A LICENSED ROOFER YOU ARE NOT LICENSED TO PERFORM THE SCOPE OF WORK. TO 11TH, 2024, HE RECEIVED EMAIL SUMMARY SHEET SAYS IT WAS CONTESTING THE FINES. THE EMAIL I DO HAVE HERE THAT I CAN PRESENT TO THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE IF YOU LIKE. IT'S NOT CONTESTING THE FINES SINCE THEY HAVE REMAINED STAYED. THE EMAIL I WILL READ FOR THE RECORD. HIGH, ELIZABETH, MY CLIENT CONTINUES TO WORK TOWARD COMPLIANCE AND CITIES REJECTING THE PERMIT SEVERAL TIMES ASKING THE CONTRACTOR FOR MORE INFORMATION. THEY ARE ASKING FOR ENGINEERING DRAWINGS TO BE REDONE TO SHOW WHERE EACH REPAIR WILL BE MADE. THE ASSOCIATION WILL NEED ADDITIONAL TIME. CAN WE REQUEST ANOTHER HEARING? BEST REGARDS, LAUREN --. THAT WAS ON JUNE 11. THIS HEARING IS RESPONDENTS REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE TIME. THE FINES HAVE STAYED.LIKE I PREVIOUSLY STATED, THE PERMIT IS READY FOR ISSUANCE PENDING A NEW CONTRACTOR COMING IN PAYING THE FEES AND SIGNING THE PERMIT CONDITIONS. PRIOR TO MAKING A RECOMMENDATION, I'D LIKE TO HEAR FOR THE RESPONDENT'S COUNSEL ASKED
WHAT THE REQUEST IS. >> THE CONTRACTOR AND REFERRED SEARCHING FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR. PURSUANT TO THE LOST PROJECTION OF THE PERMIT FAILURE TO FINALIZE THE PERMIT.
THEY HAVE WORKERS ON SITE THAT CAN COMPLETE THE WORK THAT HAS BEEN ISSUED. THE CITY FORT PIERCE ON THE WEBSITE IS DOWN AT THE MOMENT IN THE PERMITTING PROCESS IS DOWN FOR A SHORT PERIOD. EVEN WHEN THEY GET RETAINED WHICH THEY EXPECT WILL BE PRETTY IMMEDIATELY, THERE WAS A DELAY ON THE PART OF FORT PIERCE. I ACTUALLY HAVE EMAIL IN FRONT OF ME. IT'S JUST FIVE DAYS. THAT THEY CAN BE DONE OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL DAYS.
THEY ARE READY TO GET THE CCN AND GET THE FINAL PART OF THE PERMIT FINISHED. CLOSE THE PERMIT.
>> THE RESPONSE AND CITIES WEBSITE WENT DOWN YESTERDAY AT 5 PM SO WE CAN BE THE TRANSITION TO THE NEW PERMIT SYSTEM. IT'S BEEN UP AND AVAILABLE FOR SUBMITTALS OF THE 5 PM YESTERDAY. PERMIT CONDITIONS WERE SENT AND I BELIEVE IT WAS AT LEAST TWO WEEKS AGO. I MEAN THERE HAS BEEN SOME TIME FOR THE RESPONDENT TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT. IF THEY HAVE CHOSEN TO DO SO. HOW MUCH ADDITIONAL TIME
ARE YOU LOOKING FOR? >> I WANT TO CLARIFY. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE AND THE PERMIT IS TO BE CLOSED? DOES IT NEED TO BE COMPLETED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE?
>> FOR THE CASE TO BE COMPLIANCE, THE WORD NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED AND THE PERMIT CLOSED.
>> THEY NEED TO GET THE FINAL PERMIT ISSUED IN AUGUST SAID, THE WORK IS READY TO BE AND THERE ARE WORKERS READY TO
COMPLETED. SO I THINK 60 DAYS? >> STUFF IS AGREEABLE TO A 60 DAY EXTENSION OF TIME. AND THE FINES REMAINED STAYED FOR THAT
TIME. >> 60 DAYS TO BE SEPTEMBER 11.
>> SEPTEMBER 11. IT'LL BE EXTENDED TO SEPTEMBER 11, 2024.
TO PERFECT, THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.
>> THE ORDER AND FINES TO RESUME THE PERMIT IS NOT ISSUED BY SEPTEMBER 11. WHERE WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME BACK?
>> IF IT'S NOT, THERE'S NO NEED TO COME BACK. IF IT'S NOT COMPLIED BY SEPTEMBER 11, THEN THE FINES WILL BE COMMENCED.
>> THANK YOU. >> THERE IS A RIGHT TO APPEAL.
BY 30 DAYS. 30 DAY RATES WITH YOU.
>> ALL RIGHT, INC. YOU ALL. THANK YOU ALL.
>> THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT, GOODBYE.
>> OKAY, THAT'S IT. ANYTHING FURTHER?
>> IT WAS SENT CERTIFIED MAIL. IF THE GREEN CARD IS TURNED ON SIDE AND UNKIND, A NOTICE OF HEARING ENCLOSED IS MAILED BY LATER. 10 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING. A NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT BY REGULAR U.S. MAIL WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ATTACHED TO IT. COPY WAS PLACED IN THE OFFICE FILE. 10 DAYS
[01:25:05]
BEFORE THE HEARING. A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED. ON THE BULLETIN BOARD IN THE LOBBY OF CITY HALL. NOTICE OF HEARING IS ALSO POSTED AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING . IS NOT RETURNED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING, IT'S COMPLETED THE SAME WAY IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED.>> ANYTHING ELSE? >> THE HEARING IS HEREBY ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.