Aug 12, 2024 Planning Board

[1. CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:11]

>>>CALL TO ORDER THE FORT PIERCE PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

IF YOU COULD ALL PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

>> FRIENDLY REMINDER TO PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES.

BEFORE WE GO ON TO ROLL CALL, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO THANK THE VICE CHAIR FOR COVERING THE MEETING BACK IN JUNE WHILE I WAS ON VACATION. IT IS GOOD TO BE BACK.

>>

[4. CONSIDERATION OF ABSENCES]

[5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

>> CORRECT. MISS DANIEL CALLED AND WITH REASONABLE EXCUSE FOR

NOT BEING HERE TODAY. >> I HAD A CHANCE TO WATCH THE MEETING MINUTES IN JUNE. VICE CHAIR DID A WONDERFUL JOB.

>> I ASSUME YOU ALL HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE MINUTES?

>> MOTION APPROVED. >> SECOND.

>>

[a. Zoning Text Amendment - Chapter 125 - Zoning, Article V - Conditional Uses, Section 125-243 - Innovative Residential Developments]

SAID MS. CLEMENTS. >> MOVING ONTO NEW BUSINESS.

MR. FREEMAN? >> THANK YOU, CHAIR, AND PLANNING BOARD. TODAY, I'M BRINGING FORWARD THE CODEPENDENT --: AMENDMENT. THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING PLACE FROM CITY CODE. ENTITLED INNOVATING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS TO WIDEN Ú TERMS OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. THE REAL PURPOSE BEHIND THIS, HOW DO WE ENCOURAGE OR SEEK MORE PEOPLE TO BE INCLINED TO DELIVER A SUPPLY OF HOUSING. THIS NOT ONLY FITS INTO THE CHARACTER OF THE CITY, BUT ALSO CAN BE ACCOMMODATED ON SMALL BLOCKS. NATURE IN SIZE AND COST, IT WOULD BE MORE AFFORDABLE. IT ALSO LOOKS AT MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS, AND HOW WE CAN ENCOURAGE THAT TO BE MORE INNOVATIVE, IN TERMS OF INTEGRATING RESIDENTIAL, SPECIFICALLY ON SMALL LOTS.

SMALLER LOTS. NOT HAVING TO HAVE A MASSIVE PD, TO GET THE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT WITH RESIDENTIAL. ESPECIALLY TALKING ABOUT THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. SPECIFIC HISTORIC DISTRICTS. MAYBE WE NEED MORE COMMERCIAL LOCATED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. ALL OF THOSE THINGS, WE ARE TRYING TO ENGAGE WITH THIS PARTICULAR CODE CHANGE. THIS SUPPORTS THIS TYPE OF MOVEMENT FORWARD IN THE CITIES CODE. WE HAVE DENSITY BONUSES, WE HAVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS AVAILABLE. IN RESPECT TO A SINGLE SMALL LOT, THAT CAN ACCOMMODATE ONE UNIT NOW, UNDER THE DENSITY REGULATIONS, IF WE CLASSIFY ONE OF THOSE UNITS IS AFFORDABLE, THEN THEY CAN IN EFFECT DOUBLE THE UNIT AFFECT. THAT OPENS THE DOOR TO UNITS THAT ARE LEASED OUT OR RENTED OUT. MAYBE A SINGLE PARENT. SINGLE-FAMILY, OR AN INDIVIDUAL. THIS IS A MEMBER OF THE FAMILY. IF THAT IS NOT RENT THAT IS HIGHER THAN THE AFFORDABLE RIGHT, THEN YOU CAN CLASSIFY THAT AS AN ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNIT. GOOD

[00:05:05]

MIXED-USE LAND DEVELOPMENT, THEY ARE APPROPRIATE. PUSHING THIS INTO THAT CATEGORY INTO EFFECT. ALSO, THE CITY SHALL DEVELOP ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES THAT MODIFY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS, AND STREAMLINED IMPROVEMENT PROCEDURES FOR PROJECTS WITH THE FOLLOWING. THIS IS EVERYTHING THAT WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT ACHIEVING IN SOME RESPECT. WITH THIS PARTICULAR REGULATION. AS WE MOVE THROUGH THIS, THIS IS QUITE A CONFERENCE OF AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CO-DEFENDANT FROM THESE ORDINANCES. IT WILL REQUIRE A REVIEW FROM THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING BOARD, AND THE CITY COMMISSION AS WE MOVE FORWARD. IN TERMS OF IT MISTREATED PROCEDURES, WE WILL BE EXAMINING THOSE AS THE APPLICATIONS COME IN HOPEFULLY. WE WILL DO AN ANALYSIS. IS THAT CREATING TOO MANY DELAYS IN TERMS OF WHAT WE WOULD REQUIRE, WHAT THE PROCEDURE IS IN TERMS OF A PROCESS TO GET THROUGH THE BOARDS REVIEW COMMITTEES AND SO FORTH WHETHER SOME OF THESE THINGS COULD BE CLASSED AS A -- AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL.

THIS IS JUST THE FIRST STEP. TRYING TO GET SOME ANALYSIS. WE WILL SEE HOW THE COMMUNITY REACTS TO THIS TYPE OF OPPORTUNITY. POLICY 616, HAS A PLAN. WE SHALL PROMOTE VARIETIES OF HOUSING PRICE POINTS. THIS AMENDMENT DOES THAT. WE DON'T HAVE TO CHANGE THE LAND-USE FUTURE CLASSIFICATIONS. WE ARE IN EFFECT PUTTING IN OVERLAYS WHENEVER THIS HAPPENS. THIS IS A NEW ZONING DISTRICT. THIS IS A MINI PLAN DEVELOPMENT. WE CAN OVERLAY ONTO A SMALL LOT. WE ARE UPDATING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. WITH THE INTENT OF STREAMLINING THE PROCESS, ULTIMATELY. AT THE SAME TIME, REDUCING COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. MORE THAN ONE LOT, THIS IS A GOOD ECONOMY OF SCALE WHEN YOU DEVELOP SOMETHING. THIS IS COSTING OUT MATERIALS. THE CITY SHOULD ALLOW THE DWELLING UNITS IN ALL MEDIUM ZONING DISTRICTS. THIS IS WHERE WE HAVE FOUND THAT THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE, AND ZONING, WITHIN THE DECOY HISTORIC AREAS OF THE CITY, PREVENTING THE ACCOMMODATION OF TWO UNITS. THEY CAST TWO DENSITIES, INSTEAD OF THE ONE THAT PEOPLE COULD DO. IF WE LOOK AT HOW WE INTERPRET THE ALLOWANCES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FOR AFFORDABLE, WE CAN INCREASE THAT TO TWO UNITS IN A SMALL LOOK. I ALSO WORKED HARD WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE. WORKING WITH THEIR TEAM AND THEIR MEMBERS.

PRESENTED THIS AT TWO OF THEIR MEETINGS. WE DISCUSSED THE INCENTIVE STRATEGIES THAT WERE INHERENT. DEVELOPED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. DEVELOPED BY THEM, ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. IN JANUARY OF THIS YEAR. WE ARE LOOKING AT WHAT PARTS OF THIS CHANGED. A PART OF THE CODE WOULD WE BE UNDRESSING IN TERMS OF THE STRATEGIES? WE PULLED OUT FOUR ESSENTIAL PIECES TO PERMIT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND ZONING DISTRICTS. TO ALLOW ACCESSIBLE LOT CONFIGURATION.

PROVIDE FLEXIBLE DENSITY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND SUPPORT APPROPRIATELY LOCATED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT. ALL OF THOSE COULD BE ACHIEVED BY RUNNING THROUGH THIS AMENDMENT. YES, I PRESENTED THE AMENDMENTS TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUNE 6TH. JUST RECENTLY ON AUGUST 1ST. THE

[00:10:03]

INCORPORATING THAT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PUZZLE.

WE ALSO LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. THIS CAME UP THROUGH THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE HAVE VACANT PROPERTIES AND LAND? IS THERE OPPORTUNITY TO GO ON WITH THOSE? ARE WE CONSOLIDATING THE COMMUNITY IDENTITY? ARE WE ALLOWING THOSE THINGS TO HAPPEN? CREATING MORE OF A VIBRANT COMMUNITY INTERACTION.

WITHOUT GETTING THE CODE ENFORCEMENT. DOING SOMETHING, AND ALL OF THAT. THE IMPORTANT PARTS OF THE AMENDMENTS, LOOK AT MINIMUM LOT SIZE. INSTEAD OF HAVING A FIXED MINIMUM LOT SIZE, OR LOT AREA, WE ARE SAYING THAT IT WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE UNDERLYING DENSITY IN A CONFERENCE OF PLAN. NOW, YOU MIGHT BE SURPRISED TO HEAR THAT A LOT OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS, IN TERMS OF THEIR LOT AREA, DON'T NECESSARILY APPLY TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IN TERMS OF THE LOT SIZES. THIS IS SOMETHING WE HAVE TO AMEND AS THIS GOES THROUGH. THIS TAKES THAT STEP HURRIED IF YOU NEED A CERTAIN AREA UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE, TO ACCOMMODATE 6.5 UNITS PER ACRE, THEN THAT WOULD BE THE SIZE OF THE LOT.

DETERMINED BY THE UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USE. WE COULD HAVE SOME QUITE SMALL LOTS. SPECIFICALLY IF YOU ARE IN A HIGH FUTURE LAND USE. YOU CAN HAVE SMALL LOTS, TO DO THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT ON. MAXIMUM DENSITIES WILL NOT EXCEED THE DENSITIES, ALLOCATED WITHIN THE CITY'S CONFERENCE A PLAN FOR THE UNDERLYING FUTURE LAND USE. THAT IS FIXED. WE ARE NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONFERENCE A PLAN. WHAT WE ARE SAYING IS, CERTAIN TYPES OF DENSITY, WHICH THE COMPANY HAS A PLAN ALREADY A STATE -- STATES, COULD BE A COUNT 1:1 RATIO FOR DEVELOPMENT. IN EFFECT, YOU COULD DOUBLE THE DENSITY ON THE LOT. THE AREA WITH DEPTH, YARD LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS, SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE PROCESS THAT WE GO THROUGH WITH THE PLANNING BOARD. WHEN THEY LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN THAT COMES IN. THIS IS FOR THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS REVIEWED INTERNALLY TO MAKE SURE THAT IT FUNCTIONS IN TERMS OF STANDARD REGULATIONS. STORM WATCH, AND SO FORTH.

CONSIDERING THROUGH THESE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, DOES IT WARRANT RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION AS AN INNOVATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT? THERE ARE A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT PLANNING BOARD AND STAFF MAY HAVE TO TAKE INTO THE COUNT, AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON. INCLUDING COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT. WHAT ARE THE CONSTRAINTS OF THE SITE? DOES THE SITE PLAN TAKE THE DESIGN TO THOSE? CAN WE TAKE THE EXISTING TREES? CAN WE INTEGRATE WITH ADJACENT BUILDINGS WITHOUT LOOKING AT THE LIVING CONDITIONS OF THE AFFECTED BUILDINGS? DOES IT

[00:15:03]

LOOKING AT THE STREET AND HOW THAT CREATES THE VALUE WITHIN THAT STREET. LOOK AT STORM WATER. CAN WE GET SOME INNOVATIVE DEALS WITH STORMWATER? THESE THINGS ARE HEATED AND COOLED. SPECIFICALLY TO REDUCE COSTS. THIS INCLUDES THE OCCUPIERS, IN TERMS OF THE UTILITY COSTS. ALL THE TIME, MAKING SURE THAT WE ARE NOT AFFECTING THE LIGHT VENTILATION AND PRIVACY OF EXISTING AND CHASING RESIDENTIAL OCCUPIERS.

THERE ARE A LOT OF SUBJECT TO REVIEW ACTIONS FROM THIS. IT HAS TO BE 10 FEET FROM THE FRONT. WE WANT SOME INNOVATION.

WHATEVER WE GET, WE WILL COME IN AND BUILD AROUND THE EXISTING COMMUNITY. NOT DISPLACING THE EXISTING COMMUNITY. ENHANCE IT. GIVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO THE EXISTING COMMUNITIES. HAVING SAID ALL THAT, STAFF ARE RECOMMENDING WITHIN THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO THE PLANNING BOARD, TO MOVE THE PROPOSAL FORWARD. THIS IS TO THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL.

THANK YOU. >> TO MAKE SURE I'M UNDERSTANDING THIS DIRECTLY, THIS NEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, ZONING TYPE, WOULD FUNCTION IN A LOT OF WAYS LIKE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE THE INDIVIDUAL CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.

GOING THROUGH ALL OF THESE ARE SOMEWHAT SUBJECTIVE REVIEWS. I AM JUST TRYING TO IMAGINE A GOOD, POTENTIAL EXAMPLE OF SOMETHING LIKE THIS. UNIMPROVED LOT. RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, OR THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING, BUT HAS NOT BEEN BUILT, FOR EXAMPLE, ON THE CURRENT LOT SIZE. THIS IS PART OF THE UNDERLYING ZONE. ESSENTIALLY PREVENTING THE PROPERTY BOEHNER -- OWNER FROM BUILDING ANYTHING.

>> THIS IS THE SMALL LOT TO HAVE. THEY WOULD BE SUBJECTED TO ALL OF THE ZONING AXE. THEY CAN COMPRESS THE AREA.

>> THIS WOULD GIVE THIS NEW, INNOVATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, GIVING MORE FLEXIBILITY TO THE PROPERTY OWNER, AND WHAT THEY COULD BUILD. JUST MAKING THIS BOARD AND THE COMMISSION PLAY MORE INVOLVED. WHAT THE POSSIBILITIES ARE, WHAT THE RIGHT THING FOR THE

NEIGHBORHOOD WILL BE. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR

COMMENTS IN THE BOARD? >> I JUST HEARD PARKING IN THE MIDDLE OF IT. YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO PUT A STORE IN AN APARTMENT UPSTAIRS. IN THE SLOT? WHAT ABOUT PARKING?

>> PARKING WOULD BE DETERMINED BY STAFF AND THE PLANNING BOARD. LOOKING AT HOW THINGS OPERATE IN THE COMMUNITY. IS THERE ON STREET PARKING TO BE USED?

>> WE ARE NOT TAKING AWAY ANYTHING AS FAR AS THE

REQUIREMENT. >> THAT IS UP TO THEM.

>> THAT IS UP TO THE PLANNING BOARD.

>> THAT WOULD BE THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE JUSTIFICATION. THE WAY THIS IS GOING TO OPERATE, WE MAY NEED TO. THAT IS PART OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS. TRYING TO GET AWAY FROM A RIGID ZONING FRAMEWORK, TO ENCOURAGE INNOVATION, DIFFERENT WAY OF THINKING ABOUT THINGS THAT HAPPEN WITHIN THE CITY. BOTTOM LINE, THINGS AREN'T HAPPENING

[00:20:07]

NOTHING IS GUARANTEED. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. IT COMES TO THE CITY COMMISSION. THERE ARE NO ENTITLEMENTS WITH THIS. THIS IS EQUAL TO PROVE THAT THEY ARE GOING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.

SATISFYING BOTH OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THE REVIEW PLANNING BOARD CITY COMMISSION.

>> I KNOW THAT SOME OF THESE THINGS ARE GOING TO BE TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT PEOPLE ARE HISTORICALLY USED TO. WILL THERE BE NOTICES INTO THE NEIGHBORS? ARE WE GOING TO

SUGGEST THESE THINGS? >> YES. THERE WILL BE THE SITE

NOTICE AS WELL. >> I HAVE A QUESTION. IN THIS PLAN, FURTHER SPACES FOR COMMUNITY CENTERS AND GREEN SPACE? THINGS LIKE THAT AS FAR AS THE RESIDENTS TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THAT WITH THE HIGHER DENSITY POPULATION?

>> WE ARE LOOKING FOR APPLICATIONS, TO SHOW HOW THEY CONTRIBUTE TO THE COMMUNITY. ALLOWING THAT FLEX ABILITY, IN TERMS OF HOW THINGS ARE DESCRIBED, LOCATED, OR DESIGN, TO INCORPORATE ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT ELEMENTS, THIS COULD BE A MIXED-USE TYPE OF THING. OTHER THINGS ARE HAPPENING ON

THAT. >> I FIND THAT WHEN THEY HAVE A COMMUNITY THAT IS BUILT, IT IS ALL ABOUT THE PLAYGROUNDS, STOCK MARKETS, AND THINGS LIKE THAT. THE ALLOCATIONS FOR SPACE, TO SAVE SPACE FOR THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY.

>> NOT UNDER THIS REGULATION. UNLESS THAT CAME UP DURING THE DISCUSSION, THIS IS THE APPLICATION THAT WANTS TO DO

SOMETHING. >> HOW DO YOU ENCOURAGE THAT?

THAT IS MY QUESTION. >> THIS IS THE COMMENT BOARD.

>> THEY ARE COMING TO US WITH A REQUEST TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT. THIS WOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN ALLOWED. WE BASICALLY GET TO REINVENT THE WHEEL EVERY TIME ONE OF THESE APPLICATIONS COMES THROUGH. I IMAGINE THIS COULD ALSO APPLY TO CONSOLIDATION OF MULTIPLE LOTS, OR LARGER PROPERTIES. WE MAY SEE SOME OF THOSE MORE ELABORATE DEVELOPMENT IDEAS COME FORWARD. THIS IS THE PLOT THAT WE COULD HAVE THE DUPLEX

ON. >> ISOLATED LOT BY LOT. IN THESE TYPES OF SPACES, YOU DON'T SEE THE BIG ERA PICTURE OF THINGS. IT WOULD BE NICE TO SEE THE BIGGER PICTURE OF THINGS AS WELL AS WE GIVE COMMENTS AND OPINIONS.

>> WE MOVE THROUGH THIS. WE CAN SEE THE TYPE OF THINGS THAT ARE MOVING FORWARD. WHAT WE WOULD BE MOVING TO, WOULD BE COMMUNITYWIDE PLANS. IT WOULD ALMOST BE LIKE AN ACTION PLAN FOR THAT COMMUNITY. WE WOULD START TO IDENTIFY AREAS AND LOCATIONS AND DEFICIENCIES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. STARTING TO ALLOCATE AS FAR AS WE CAN. BEARING IN MIND, IT IS PRIVATE PROPERTY, MOST OF IT. THIS IS WITH PROPERTY OWNERS. THE ELEMENTS THAT WE WOULD HOPEFULLY WANT TO BE SEEN AS COMMUNITIES, I THINK THERE IS A LOT TO DEAL WITH GETTING THE COMMUNITY ENGAGED. RESPONDING TO THESE TYPES OF THINGS AS THEY COME FORWARD. THEY HAVE ACTUAL ISSUES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. YOU WILL GET A LOT OF THAT. THINGS WILL BE SO DIFFERENT, IN TERMS OF WHAT IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW. STANDARD DUPLEX. LOOKING AT THE SETBACKS, THEY HAVE THE EXISTING CHARACTER OF THE STREET THAT THEY ARE IN. I WOULD RATHER TRY AND RETAIN TO HAVE THE BUILDING TYPES. THEY

[00:25:01]

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD?

>> THIS IS A VERY AMBITIOUS AND CREATIVE IDEA. I AM REALLY INTERESTED TO SEE WHAT THE RESPONSE OF THE COMMUNITY IS GOING TO BE. I EXPECT THAT WE WILL SEE VERY INTERESTING APPLICATIONS. I WOULD HOPE TO EXPECT VERY INTERESTING APPLICATIONS COMING FORWARD. WE WILL INVENT THE PROCESS AS WE

GO. >> I AM LOOKING FORWARD TO IT.

WE ARE GOING TO SEE SOME GOOD THINGS.

>> I WOULD ASK THE AUDIENCE MEMBERS. IF THERE IS ANYBODY WHO WANTS FROM THE PUBLIC, TO COMMENT ON THIS AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE COME FORWARD. PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, SIGN IN,

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. >> GOOD TO SEE YOU AGAIN.

>> I DIDN'T WANT TO PUT MY SUPPORT BEHIND THE IDEA.

BRINGING IN FIVE DEVELOPERS OF CO-LOTS. THIS IS MOSTLY WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. INFILL LOTS. THESE ARE REMNANTS SPACES. SO FAR, NOT PRODUCING THE ECONOMIC IMPACT THAT IS NECESSARY TO BRING DEVELOPERS IN. A LOT OF THE IDEAS THAT DEVELOPERS WERE TALKING ABOUT, THINGS THAT ARE STIFLING THEM IN THE CURRENT STRUCTURE, IS AVAILABLE FOR WHAT WE CAN SEE IN THE PLAN IN FRONT OF US. IF YOU CAN'T SEE WHAT IT IS, I WANT YOU TO THINK ABOUT ANY NEIGHBORHOOD OR PLACE THAT YOU HAVE GONE TOO. FOR VACATION, I WANT TO LIVE HERE. BARCELONA, WHEN I WENT THERE, THE PLACE THAT I WAS STAYING IN, IT LOOKED LIKE PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I FOUND PEOPLE WALKING IN, THINKING IT WAS A STORE. THIS IS PART OF THE DIFFERENT PRICE TAGS. THERE IS A CAFE. THERE IS A PLACE WHERE KIDS ARE PLAYING AS A NURSERY DOWN THE STREET. THIS IS THE RESTAURANT. ABOVE AND AROUND IT. WE ARE LIVING IN VARIOUS SIZES. THIS IS PART OF THE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT. IT SEEMS LIKE THERE IS MORE OF A FLOW. THERE IS NOT A SETBACK AND SPACE BETWEEN SOMEBODY SITTING ON THE PORCH. SOME OF THE PLACES IN THE HOUSE, THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY LOOKING AT THE STREET. THEY ARE SAFE. THERE ARE MORE EYES ON THEM. THIS IS BILLED FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE SPECIAL NEEDS. THEY CAN LIVE SEPARATELY. WITH MYSELF, I HAVE THE NEED TO BE IN COMMUNITY. I WANT MY SEPARATE SPACE. I SEE THEM EVERY DAY AND INTERACT WITH THEM EVERY DAY. OTHER ISSUES IN MY LIFE WOULD START TO POP UP. MY NEIGHBORS ALL AROUND ME, I DON'T KNOW THEM. I DON'T HAVE TO SCREAM TO TALK TO ANY OF THEM. YOU MIGHT SEE FIVE CARS LIVING IN THIS SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE. THESE KINDS OF STRUCTURES WOULD ALLOW THE FAMILY TO BREAK OFF AND DETERMINE THEIR OWN SPACES, BUT

STILL REMAIN. THANK YOU. >> PLEASE COME FORWARD.

>> MY NAME IS HENRY HARBISON. I KNOW THE FINANCE AND REVIEW COMMITTEE, I READ THAT A COUPLE OF TIMES. THEY CAME OUT AS THIS PIECE OF WORK. I THINK IT IS A GOOD IDEA TO FOR HOUSING.

MOVING IN SOME OF THOSE AREAS THAT ARE SMALLER. THEY CAN PUT SOMETHING ON. THEY CAN BLEND IN WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. TO A NEI THAN SOME OF THESE AREAS THAT WE HAVE HAD. I THINK IT IS A GOOD MOVE. LIKE YOU SAID. IT IS GOING TO BE A WORK IN PROGRESS.

[00:30:02]

>> COULD YOU PLEASE SIGN IN? >> ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS PUBLIC AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, I WILL SEND IT BACK TO THE BOARD. ONE LESS CHANCE FOR COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, CONCERNS. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

>> I MOVED FOR APPROVAL. >> MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY MYSTIC ELEMENTS. SECOND BY MS. CARTER.

>>

[b. Annexation - Savannah Landing Partners 2427-801-0056-000-3 and 2427-801-0053-000-2 ]

SAVANNA ATLANTIC PARTNERS. >> LOOKING AT THE COMMUNITY CHAIR BOARD MEMBERS. THIS IS BEFORE YOU THIS AFTERNOON.

JAMES HACKETT. >> H AND L PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SAVANNA LAND PARTNERS LLC. 242780100456. 24278 010053 READ 0002. 310 DIXON DRIVE. THIS IS NEAR INTERSECTION U.S. ONE SOUTH AND DIXON DRIVE. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATED FOR RESIDENTIAL HIGH RH. RM DASH 11. RESIDENTIAL HIGH, ALLOWING 12-18 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL R 5. HERE IS THE SITE LOCATION. AREA VIEW OF THE TWO PARCELS. THE SITE AREA IN TOTAL IS APPROXIMATELY 7.5 ACRES. 310 DIXON DRIVE. .24 ACRES. THE OTHER PARCEL WITH THE ADDRESS IS 7.268 HOURS. GIVE OR TAKE. PURSUANT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY 1.11.5, PROPERTIES AND EXIT SHOULD RECEIVE THE LAND-USE STAGNATION COMPATIBLE WITH THE COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. STAFF HAS CONFIRMED THAT THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITH UNINCORPORATED ST. LOUIS COUNTY IN CONTINGENT WITH FORT PIERCE CITY. FPO A SERVICE AREA. FURTHERMORE, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 1.71046 SECTION FLORIDA 1 STATUTE. RECOGNIZES ENCLAVES CAN CREATE SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS IN PLANNING, GROWTH MANAGEMENT, AND SERVICE DELIVERY. THERE FOR DECLARES THAT THIS IS A POLICY OF THE STATE TO ELIMINATE ENCLAVES. THE CURRENT VALUE OF THE PROPERTIES, $756,500 DID AGAIN, THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE IN THE COUNTY AS WE SEE HERE, RH. RESIDENTIAL HIGH.

SURROUNDED BY THE CITY PROPERTIES. WITH THE ACCEPTED ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY, THIS PROPERTY WOULD TAKE ON A FUTURE LAND USE . DECREASING THE ENCLAVE. THE EXISTING ZONING IN THE COUNTY'S R N-11. ACCEPTING THE PROPOSED CITIES ON ZONING DESIGNATION. R-5 RESIDENTIAL. REDUCING THE ENCLAVE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS FOR THE PLANNING BOARD TO REMOVE THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION FOR THE APPROVAL TO CITY COMMISSION.

ULTIMATE RECOMMENDATIONS, ONE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS. TWO,

[00:35:01]

DISAPPROVAL. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?

>> DIXON DRIVE? IS IT CITY OR COUNTY?

>> THE ROAD? >> THIS IS ONLY GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT ANNEXATION RIGHT NOW, RIGHT?

>> YES. >> I AM CURIOUS WHO IS GOING TO OWN THAT. IT IS GOING TO BE AN ISSUE.

>> NOT DIXON ROAD, IT IS COUNTY. JUST BEAR WITH ME. I AM

LOOKING. >> IT IS A FAMILIAR TOPIC OF CONVERSATION. ANNEXATION AS A COUNTY. COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS.

RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY CAN CONSIDER TAKING OVER. GIVEN THAT IT IS PART OF THE 50% CITY PROPERTIES AND COUNTIES.

>> HOW DOES THE CITY FEEL ABOUT THAT?

>> I DON'T THINK THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT -- IT HAS TO BE A WIDE DISCUSSION WITHIN THE CITY. AS TO MAINTENANCE, AND ALL OF THE COSTS INVOLVED. IT IS AN ONGOING DISCUSSION. I WOULD THINK IF THIS DEVELOPMENT CAME IN, THEN THE COUNTY WOULD BE REQUIRING THIS MEETING TO MEET THEIR STANDARDS. UNLESS IT IS A CITY ROADWAY. THAT IS

DIFFERENT. >> I WANTED TO BRING THAT UP.

THE ROAD NEEDS FIXING AS IT IS RIGHT NOW. IT HAS POTHOLES. IT IS DEFINITELY GOING TO BE AN ISSUE. WHEN WE GIVE THIS TO THE CITY, AND THEY SAID THEY WANT TO BUILD SOMETHING, WE ARE BACK TO THE SAME PROBLEMS WE ALWAYS HAVE. THE PROPERTY WITH THE

ROAD IS BAD. >> THE CITY OF THEY WOULD TAKE, WOULD BE UP TO STANDARD BEFORE WE TOOK IT.

>> YOU CAN SIT THERE WITH THE COUNTY. NOT FIXING THE ROAD JUST GIVE IT TO THEIR CITY. THIS BECOMES AN ISSUE.

>> WHY DON'T WE HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT? PLEASE COME FORWARD, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. SIGN IN, AND SHARE WITH US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT YOUR PLANS FOR THE FUTURE AS WELL.

>> GOOD AFTERNOON, JAMES HACKETT VARIED RESENTING THE APPLICATION HERE WITH ME. IN CASE YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS LIKE THIS ONE. WE UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS WAS GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD HAVE ADDRESSED, WITH THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. WORKING ON IMPROVEMENTS FOR THOSE

ROADWAYS. >> LOOKING AT THE MAP, IT SEEMS LIKE YOU HAVE SOME UNIQUE, RIGHT-OF-WAY CONDITIONS THAT YOU NEED SOLVING? I ASSUME YOU ARE NEEDING CONDITIONS TO FIGURE OUT HOW THAT IS GOING TO WORK?

>> YES SIR. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

>> DRAINAGE. >> YES SIR.

>> YOU ARE WORKING WITH THE COUNTY IN THIS PROPERTY I TAKE IT? THIS IS GOING TO BE ANOTHER ONE? IT ALL DRAINS TO THE

COUNTY? >> WE UNDERSTAND, WE HAVEN'T ADDRESS ALL OF THEM YET AT THIS POINT.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO THROW IT OUT THERE, SO THAT IT IS NOT A BRICK WALL WHEN IT COMES OUT AGAIN.

>> ABSOLUTELY. I AGREE. >> DO YOU HAVE ANY OVERALL PLANS IN DEVELOPMENT THAT ARE SOLIDIFIED ENOUGH TO SHOW US WHAT YOUR DIVISION -- VISION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ON THIS

PROPERTY IS? >> A LITTLE BIT. HI DENSITY, SINGLE FAMILY, AFFORDABLE HOUSING ASPECT OF IT AS WELL.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> CAN YOU PLEASE SIGN IN?

>> I HAD A QUESTION FOR YOU. SMALL PARTIAL CONTINGENCY, IS THAT THE SAME CONDITION AS THE LARGER PARCEL? DO YOU HAVE THE SAME VISION AS FAR AS HOUSING AND DWELLING FOR THAT SMALLER

PARCEL? >> WE HAVEN'T HAD THE FULL DESIGN WORK OF IT. IT IS GOING TO CAUSE AN ISSUE WITH THE EXISTING HOUSE. JUST NORTHWEST OF IT. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO PROVIDE ONE OF THE QUESTIONS. WHEN WE COMBINE THE LOTS, THIS WILL BE TO THAT PROPERTY. OBVIOUSLY, YOU CAN MAINTAIN ACCESS IN THE DRIVEWAY. WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO 310? WE

DON'T KNOW YET. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE

[00:40:02]

>> THANK YOU. >> ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, I WILL SEND IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, CONCERNS. HEARING NONE, I WOULD ENTERTAIN A

MOTION. >> MOTION TO APPROVE THE

ANNEXATION. >> SECOND.

>> MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND BY MS. CLEMENS. PLEASE CALL THE

ROLL. >>

[c. Annexation - 1835 and 1839 Sandridge Road]

>> ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON. ITEM 6C. 18-3518 39, SANDRIDGE ROAD.

>> AGAIN, THIS IS THE ANNEXATION 1835 AND 1839 SANDRIDGE ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS JASON MERRITT, AS WELL AS THE PROPERTY OWNER. PARCEL I.D., 240-4111 0003.

24041110003. 0008. A REQUEST TO VOLUNTEER APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION. TWO PARCELS OF LAND AT 1835 SANDRIDGE, AND 1839 SANDRIDGE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES HAVE THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY DESIGNATION LAND USE FROM COMMERCIAL AND IN ST.

LUCIE COUNTY ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF COMMERCIAL GENERAL. THE PROPOSED CITY LAND-USE FIXTURE IS GENERAL COMMERCIAL. THIS IS WITH A CLASSIFICATION OF GENERAL C 3.

SITE LOCATION OF THE TWO PROPERTIES, APPROXIMATELY 2.15 ACRES. 1.32 ACRES. 1839, .83 ACRES. PURSUANT TO THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN POLICY, 1.11.5, PROPERTY SHALL RECEIVE THE LAND-USE DESIGNATION COMPATIBLE WITH THE COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CORPORATION IS CONTAGIOUS TO THE CITY OF POOR CITY, INCLUDING THE SERVICE AREA. MARK PURSUANT TO THE CHAPTER 171.6 SUBSECTION, THE LEGISLATURE RECOGNIZES THAT ENCLAVES CAN CREATE SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS IN PLANNING GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND SERVICE DELIVERY. THERE FOR DECLARES THAT THIS IS THE POLICY OF THE STATE TO ELIMINATE ENCLAVES. COMBINING, ABOUT 600,000.

EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE IN THE COUNTY HAS TO PICK THE COMMERCIAL. SURROUNDED BY THE CITY'S OWN PROPERTIES, OF THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL FEATURE LAND-USE. IF APPROVED, THIS WOULD MOVE TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL ALIGNING WITH THE OTHER PROPERTIES. PROPOSED EXISTING IN A COUNTIES -- A COUNTY, SURROUNDED BY CITY ZONING. C-3. IF THE ANNEXATION IS APPROVED, THE CITY'S ZONING WOULD TAKE ON C-3, ALONG WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS FOR THE PLANNING BOARD TO PROMOTE THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION APPLICATION TO APPROVAL FOR THE CITY COMMISSION. APPROVAL WITH

DISAPPROVAL. THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT. I THINK WE CAN SEE ON THE METHOD THIS IS A FAIRLY COMMON SENSE. LATERAL MOVE. AND THE ACTION EASIER THAN THE EXAMPLES WE HAD TO LOOK AT. JUST FOR EVERYBODY'S BENEFIT HERE, WE ARE LOOKING AT TWO PROPERTIES ON THE RIVER. ADJACENT -- BEHIND THE NEW CAR WASH. WE HAVE HAD SOME RECENT IMPROVEMENTS HERE AT THE U.S.

HIGHWAY 1 ACCESS. THESE ARE TWO, VERY GOOD PROPERTIES TO BRING INTO THE CITY. I KNOW THAT THERE ARE WORSE PRODUCTION

[00:45:04]

>> HELLO, EVERYONE. WE HOPE TO BUILD A FUTURE RESTAURANT AND ENTERTAINMENT RIGHT THERE. OUTDOOR ENTERTAINMENT FOR FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THAT IS THE FUTURE USE OF OUR HOPES. ANY

OTHER QUESTIONS? >> ANY OF THE QUESTIONS THAT I NEED FROM THE BOARD FOR THE APPLICANT?

>> IS THERE ANY ISSUE WITH THE WATER ON THAT LAND? WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THEM FOR A WHILE. NOTHING IS BEEN BROUGHT UP. PROPER DRAINAGE AND RETENTION. IN KEEPING OUR WATER ON OUR PROPERTY BEFORE IT IS THAT WE KNOW THAT JUST TO THE SOUTH, THEY WOULD TRY TO BE JOINED.

>> THAT IS WHERE WE ARE ALSO LOOKING FOR SOME GUIDANCE AS

WELL. >> CAN YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD? PLEASE SIGN IN.

>> I OWN THE LAND JUST SOUTH OF THE. SOMEBODIES AND MYSELF ARE LOOKING AT THIS AS A PROJECT TOGETHER. THE ISSUES THAT WE ARE TRYING TO RUN INTO, ARE ALSO THE SAME IDEA WITH THE ROADS. WE MIGHT HAVE MORE INSIGHT ON AS WELL.

>> PRIOR TO NX, WE HAVE SOME HESITATION. I HAVE A COUPLE OF OTHER BUSINESSES HERE IN TOWN. I HAVE BEEN DOING A LOT OF RESISTANCE IN GENERAL. HOPING NOT TO DO THAT RIGHT HERE.

DIFFERENT SHOPS, DIFFERENT RESTAURANTS. IF IT IS NOT IN THE INTEREST OF THE CITY, THAT JUST BECAME ANOTHER CAR WASH.

WE ARE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING MORE INVENTIVE. GIVING FORT PIERCE A LITTLE BIT MORE CHARACTER, AND ANOTHER AREA TO HANG OUT AT. WHAT WE ARE WONDERING, IF WE ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO GET THE SUPPORT OF THE CITY, OR IF IT IS JUST BETTER TO TURN INTO ANOTHER CAR WASH OR STORAGE FACILITY.

SOMETHING LIKE THAT. WHAT WE ARE LOOKING TO DO IS A LITTLE BIT MORE CREATIVE AND OUTSIDE THE BOX. WE ARE JUST A LITTLE BIT UNSURE. WE ARE PRETTY GUNG ON THIS. AS WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH ENGINEERS, AND ARCHITECTS, THEY ARE THROWING A LOT OF RED FLAGS AT US. DIFFERENT SETBACKS, IT IS SUCH A UNIQUE PIECE OF PROPERTY. IT IS A LONG, SKINNY ONE. IT MIGHT NOT WORK READ LIKE I SAID, WE ARE THE FOR MORE CLARITY TOO WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE ROADS THERE IS NO CLEAR ANSWER. AS FAR AS THE WATER RUNS, ALL OF THE CONCERNS, IS THERE ANY HELP THAT YOU GUYS CAN GIVE US? ANY ANSWERS PRIOR TO BRINGING THIS INTO THE CITY?

>> JUST SO I UNDERSTAND THE TWO PARCELS THAT ARE PART OF THIS APPLICATION, FOR ANNEXATION, YOU RUN THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH OF THAT IS ALREADY IN THE CITY? IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING? YOUR ULTIMATE GOAL FOR DEVELOPMENT, IS A SINGLE

[00:50:06]

UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT? >> THE GENTLEMAN TO YOUR RIGHT, WOULD BE THE BEST RESOURCE TO ANSWER ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS AS YOU SAW FROM ONE OF OUR EARLIER PRESENTATION ITEMS, THE INTENT OF THE PLANNING STAFF, PACIFICALLY IN THE CITY, MAKING VISIONS ACHIEVABLE FOR YOURSELF. LOOKING TO DEVELOP THINGS. YOU MENTIONED EARLIER, YOUR GOAL FOR WHAT YOU WANT TO BUILD HERE. YOU SAID SOMETHING. DID I HEAR YOU SAY FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT? SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES?

>> NOT JUST MASS BUILDINGS EVERYWHERE. SIMILAR, IT REMINDS ME OF THE VINEYARD OUT WEST. YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE THE ONE ACRE PROPERTY TO SPEND THE AFTERNOON.

>> YOUR CONCERNS, ARE THEY ON THE ALLOWABLE USES SIDE

>> THIS IS THE FACT IN THE PAPER OF THE ROAD. WE DIDN'T WANT IT TO BE 22 FEET. IF WE HAD TO DO THE WHOLE ROAD, IT PUTS IT OUT OF THE BUDGET. IT SHUTS IT DOWN. WE ARE ROWING IN THE SETBACKS. I THINK WE WERE TOLD THAT WE HAD TO BE 25 FEET OFF THE EDGE OF THE ROAD. OBVIOUSLY, FIRST THINGS FIRST.

WE WILL DEAL WITH THE ANNEXATION. I CERTAINLY HOPE THAT WE GET REST OF THE ISSUES. THIS IS PART OF THE CITY AND THE CAFFEINE. THAT MIGHT BE PERTINENT TO OUR DETRIMENT.

>> WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO HERE?

>> GET A DIRECT ANSWER. THIS IS THE WRONG BOARD. LET'S FIX THE ROAD WITH YOU. WE DON'T HAVE THAT. THE ONLY THING IN FRONT OF HIS ANNEXATION IT IS MY WEEKEND FIX. WE'RE GOING TO DO THE ROADS. KEVIN, CAN YOU HELP WITH THIS AT ALL? THE CITY, I ASK OF THE ROAD. MAYBE IT WOULD NEED TO BE THE PLAN DEVELOPED APPLICATION. SOME OF THE IMAGINATIVE AND INNOVATIVE THINGS THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT, WE CAN PROPOSE AT SOME REALLY COOL THINGS ON THERE. WE CAN GET THAT ANALYZED THROUGH THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THE ROADWAY, THAT MIGHT NEED SOME NEGOTIATION WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY. IF IT IS A PHASE THING, THEY MIGHT ACCEPT THAT. I WOULD SAY, BE CAREFUL OF LOOKING AT A PHASE. YOU ARE LOSING THE ECONOMY OF SCALE. IF YOU MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO SOMETHING. MOBILIZING, TRANSPORT, DOING THE ENGINEERING. THAT COULD BE MORE EXPENSIVE THAN DOING THE WHOLE THING. I THINK WE CAN GENERATE THE USES, AND THE LAYOUT AND PARTICULARLY, THIS AREA. VERY LITTLE RESIDENTIAL.

YOU HAVE VERY LOTS OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE ON THIS. THE ONLY ISSUE WOULD BE THE ROADWAY. WHETHER YOU STATE IN THE COUNTY, OR CAME INTO THE CITY, THE ROADWAY WOULD STILL NEED TO BE FIXED. IF YOU DIDN'T ANNEX, AND YOU RUN THIS THROUGH THE COUNTY, THEY WOULD BE ASKING FOR EXACTLY THE SAME THING. THE ONLY THING THAT WE CAN CONTROL, IS WHAT GOES ON

[00:55:04]

>> WE'VE GOT 50% FIXED. WE WILL WORK WITH YOU ON SETBACKS.

>> I DON'T KNOW. >> LET ME ASK YOU THIS QUESTION. THIS MIGHT HELP ME. ARE YOU INTENDING TO PUT

PARKING ON SITE? >> YES.

>> WHAT IF THAT PARKING WENT INTO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY? YOU CAN ADD ON STREET PARKING, INSTEAD OF ON-SITE PARKING. WOULD YOU STILL BE HAVING THE COST OF PARKING? IN EFFECT, YOU WOULD BE ADDING THAT TO THE COST OF TAKING THAT AWAY FROM IMPROVING

THE ROADWAY. >> IS THIS HOW WE ARE GETTING

IN RIGHT THERE? >> THIS IS GOING TO BE THE ACCEPTANCE BY THE COUNTY. THE CITY WOULD CERTAINLY SUPPORT

THAT. >> EVEN IF WE DID GO IN, THIS IS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE COUNTY.

>> YOU ARE STILL TIED TO THE COUNTY.

>> THIS IS THE PARKING ON RIGHT THERE. THIS IS REMOVING THE COST OF DOING THAT ON SITE. THEY ARE IMPROVING THE RIGHT

AWAY, AND IMPROVING THE COST. >> I WOULD ASK THAT THE REMAINDER OF THIS CONVERSATION BE MOVED TO OFF-LINE. KEVIN, GOING TO BE THE BEST RESOURCE FOR YOU. I WANT TO THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. ANY OTHER MEMBER THAT WANTS TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? ANY OTHER COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, OR

CONCERNS? >> THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE

ANNEX, RIGHT? >> ARE YOU STILL WANTING TO BE

ANNEX? >> I AM GOING TO ENTERTAIN A

MOTION. >> I MOVED FOR APPROVAL.

>> SECOND. >> PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>>

[d. Major Amendment to Planned Development (Master Planned Development) Sunrise Residential - 9850 Midway Road]

>> GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN, BOARD MEMBERS.

>> BEFORE WE HAVE SUNRISE PRESIDENTIAL PD, WITH THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. PARCEL I.D. 2334. 3400000. 000-27.

00034. 10000 000-1. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTHWEST CORNER. WESTWOOD MIDWAY ROAD. INTERSTATE 95. APPROXIMATELY 9850 WEST MIDWAY ROAD. ASSOCIATES AND PROPERTY OWNERS, THE REQUEST IS FOR THE MAJOR AMENDMENT TO FOR THE PARCELS OF LAND. THE SUBJECT SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 516 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES. AS YOU CAN SEE, THESE ARE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. THIS IS WITH LAVENDER OR LIGHT PURPLE.

>> APPEARANCE FUTURE LAND USE, MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT. CURRENT ZONING, PREVIOUS PLANT DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS WHAT I WOULD EXPLAIN. ROUNDING PORT ST. LUCIE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FUTURE LAND USE, SURROUNDING ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND PORT ST.

LUCIE ZONING. A LITTLE BIT OF SOME HISTORY ABOUT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ON APRIL 4TH, 2016. CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE APPROVING THE MAP AMENDMENT FROM THE SUBJECT

[01:00:06]

PLANT UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE. LARGEST PARCEL, ANNEXED IN 2010. RETAINING THE COUNTING RESILIENCY FOR THE 2.5 EVERY CULTURE. 116 ACRE PARCEL, FIRST ANNEXATION IN 2015. THIS IS PART OF THE SEVERAL -- SEPARATE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT. ORIGINAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT IN MIDWAY. 1,500,000 SQUARE FEET OF WAREHOUSE. 650 SQUARE UNITS OF MULTIFAMILY. 160,000 SQUARE FEET OF SHOPPING CENTER COMMERCIAL GENERAL. 1,200,000, GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FLEX SPACE. 5000 SQUARE FEET OF THE COMMUNITY STORE. 10,000 SQUARE FEET OF FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS.

10,000 SQUARE FEET OF HIGH TURNOVER RESTAURANTS. THE PROPOSED PLAN, WILL CONSIST OF 1590 UNITS. APPROXIMATELY 3.08 UNITS PER ACRE. AND, 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL.

WHICH IS A REDUCTION IN TRAFFIC VALUE. PHASING PLAN, WILL INCLUDE A PHASE ONE. 867 UNIT. CONSISTING OF THE 409 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES HURRIED 458 TOWNHOMES. OF THAT, 771 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. 458 POUNDS.

>> THIS IS THE IMAGING DETAIL. THE APPLICANTS ARE PROPOSING 2349 TREES. 111 SHRUBS. THIS IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN CALCULATIONS. THIS IS A TYPICAL STREET SECTION FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH THE STREET TREES. FOR TRAFFIC, THIS IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF REVIEWS IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY.

APPLICANT SUBMITTED A COPY OF THE RESPONSES, AND THE REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT TO THE COUNTY ON JULY 16TH, 2024.

MEETING WITH THE STAFF ON JULY 30TH. PROJECT B FOR THE ARTERIAL AND ROADS, AND SEEING THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONS. THE COUNTY WAS GENERALLY IN CONSENSUS WITH THE GENERAL APPROACH. ONE OF THEIR CONSULTANTS WILL WEIGH IN. THE APPLICANT KNOWS THAT THEY WILL WORK WITH THE COUNTY AND ENTERTAIN OPEN LINES OF COMMUNICATION. CONSULTANTS HAVE BEEN SENT IN WITH NEW COMMENTS. ON JULY 31ST. WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF RESPONDING TO THESE COMMENTS. THE APPLICANT IS.

CITY OF FORT PIERCE, RESPONDING TO ALL OF THE COMMENTS WITH THE RECENT SUBMITTAL. RESPONDING TO THE CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE. IT THEY RESPONDED. ALSO, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, WITH ONE CONDITION. THE APPLICANT FROM THE PROPOSED MASTER DEVELOPER, MEETING ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS, SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT ZONE. POSSIBLE ACTIONS OF THE PLANNING BOARD, FOR THIS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT, WOULD BE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. CHANGES AND ALTERNATIVE CONDITIONS. RECOMMENDING DENIAL. THANK YOU.

>> ALL RIGHT. THINGS AND NEEDS HAVE CHANGED QUITE A BIT SINCE 2016. THIS IS A VERY IMPRESSIVE SCALE AND DEVELOPMENT. I SPENT QUITE A BIT OF TIME REVIEWING THIS. THERE ARE A LOT OF

[01:05:01]

STAFF AT THIS TIME >> CAN WE JUST FIND OUT WHAT THIS TRAFFIC MEANT? WHO OWNS MIDWAY ROAD? ARE WE DOING SOMETHING WITH IT BEFORE WE SAY YES TO PUTTING IN ALL OF THESE UNITS? IS THAT WHAT THIS ONE IS?

>> YES. IN THE DOCUMENTATION, THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SOME OF THOSE SURROUNDING ELEMENTS.

>> DO YOU WANT ME TO WAIT? >> PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT, THE AGREEMENT HAS BEEN SET OUT. THEY HAVE SOME IMPROVEMENTS. I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE THOSE OUT.

>> THERE ARE GOING TO BE SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS TO

MIDWAY. >> BOTH PROJECTS WITHIN PORT ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND ST. LUCIE, WITHIN THAT AREA.

>> FROM WHAT I AM HEARING, IS FROM WHAT YOU ARE READING, WE ARE GOING TO WORK WITH THE COUNTY, WE ARE GOING TO WORK WITH PORT ST. LUCIE. GOING AHEAD AND BUILDING IT. HOPING

THE ROADS GET TAKEN CARE OF. >> WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT. HE IS ON RECORD. BEING REVIEWED BY THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT AT THE MOMENT. INDICATES THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THIS APPLICANT.

THAT AGREEMENT, THE REMAINING OPEN ENDS TO THE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS, WILL BE FINALIZED PRIOR TO CITY COMMISSION. WE WOULD NEED TO BE AS YOU SAY, TOTALLY IN LINE WITH THE PURPOSE -- IMPROVEMENTS FROM THIS

DEVELOPMENT. >> OKAY.

>> PARDON MY REASON FOR YOU GUYS. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE BEEN OUT THERE. FOUR LANES, AND IT GOES TO TWO LANES. IF YOU ARE EVER GOING TO THE FAIR, THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IF YOU DON'T DO SOMETHING WITH IT. I DON'T KNOW IF GOING 50 FEET OR TWO MILES IS GOOD. I CAN'T EXPECT THE DEVELOPER TO GO ALL THE WAY OUT TO OKEECHOBEE. AGAIN, IT IS OUT OF OUR CONTROL. WE CAN SAY YES TO BUILDING THIS. WITH A PROMISE THAT WE WILL TAKE CARE OF THE ROADS. THESE ARE MY TWO

CENTS TO THAT. >> ONE WAS IN THIS POSITION. IT

IS ALMOST LIKE EVERY MEETING. >> THIS IS SOMETHING TO POINT

OUT. >> THIS IS IN THE STAFF REPORT ON PAGE EIGHT. PART OF THE SUMMARY OF THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WAS PART OF THE SUMMARY INDICATION PROPOSAL. THREE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS. THIS IS SECURE FOR FORT PIERCE. WE HAVE TWO OTHER DEVELOPMENTS BETWEEN THE TWO. WE HAVE LONG UNITS PLANNED. THOSE ARE IN PORT ST. LUCIE. JUST OUTSIDE.

THIS PART OF TOWN, IT IS GREAT. WE CAN GET THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO GO WITH IT. RIGHT NOW, IT IS NOT THERE. WE HAVE WATCHED MIDWAY ROAD FOR HALF A MILE. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT PUTTING A COMMUNITY IN. THEN WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT THE ROAD. I WILL

SHUT UP NOW AND LISTEN. >> I DON'T KNOW IF I COULD

EVER GET YOU TO DO THAT. >>

[01:10:02]

>> THIS IS ONE OF THE FIRST, NEW PLAN DEVELOPMENTS, AND APPLICATIONS THAT HAVE GONE THROUGH WITH A NEW CODE. AS PART OF THE NEW CODE, THERE IS A REQUIREMENT FOR THE AGREEMENT. WHAT YOU CAN SEE ON YOUR SCREEN NOW, IS THE PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THAT INCLUDES IN PARTICULAR TO THIS DEVELOPMENT, TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTIONS, ELEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS. THEY HAVE BEEN COMMITTED TO, BUT I'LL APPLICANT AND THE DEVELOPERS FROM THIS. PRIOR TO ACTUALLY GETTING APPROVED. THIS WOULD FORM PART OF THE CITY COMMISSION'S APPROVAL. THIS WOULD BE NEEDING TO BE MOVED ON BY THE CITY PLANNING BOARD. TO SAY THAT THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE THESE TWO THINGS. THESE ARE THINGS THEY WILL BE DOING WITH THIS. SEVEN MILES IS A FULL LANE -- FOUR LANE FACILITY. MIDWAY TO PROPERTIES OF THE NORTHWEST BOUNDARY. THAT IS ONE PIECE. THE APPLICANT WILL OCCUPY THE NORTH MIDWAY ROAD AND ARTERIAL A INTERSECTION. INCLUDING A NEW MASTER ARM FOR SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC. THE APPLICANT WILL MAKE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, TO MIDWAY ROAD AND ARTERIAL A. THIS IS ONE SHARE ROAD. ONE DEDICATED RIGHT TURN LANE AT PEDESTRIAN FEATURES. THIS INCLUDES ALL FOUR LEGS OF THE INTERSECTION. INSTALLING THE TERM BATTLING TO THE PARTIAL. THESE ARE PART OF THE ONGOING DISCUSSIONS WITH PORT ST. LUCIE. S DOT, THE COUNTY, AND OTHER RESPECTS OF THE CITY. THIS IS NOT NEAR THE ROADWAYS. WE THOUGHT IT WAS VERY IMPORTANT AS WE WERE GOING THROUGH THIS REVIEW. INCLUDING PORT ST. LUCIE AS THEY HAVE. WE HAVE A LOT OF THINGS COMING ON TO MIDWAY. THIS IS PART OF THE COUNTY. F DOT. THEY ARE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT THE INTERSECTION AT SOME POINT FROM THEIR RAILWAY SYSTEM. TO GET THOSE PEOPLE ONLINE, WE HAVE THE PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS. KEEPING THEM INFORMED ABOUT LOADINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE GOING TO GO ONTO THE TRAFFIC SYSTEM. THIS IS GOING TO BE A DEVELOPMENT AND IMPORTANT SUBJECT. WE HAVE ENTITIES THAT ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE TO THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. WE HAD BEEN CONSULTED IN TERMS OF THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT THAT WERE HAPPENING IN THIS AREA. WE TOOK THE OPPORTUNITY TO ENGAGE WITH ALL OF THESE OPPORTUNITIES, TO TRY AND FIGURE THIS OUT, AND NOT CAUSE THE ISSUES THAT YOU ARE QUITE THE CHEESE QUITE RIGHTLY TALKING TO. I THINK THE APPLICANT HAS SOME ACTUAL COSTS, TO THESE IMPROVEMENTS. THEY WOULD BE COMMITTING TO.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? LET'S GO AHEAD AND GET THE APPLICANT APPEAR. COME FORWARD, STATE YOUR ADDRESS, SIGN IN. TELL US ABOUT THE UPDATE TO THE PREVIOUSLY

APPROVED -- >> THERE HAS ALREADY BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION. REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT. IT IS A PLEASURE TO BE IN FRONT OF YOUR CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBERS. WE HAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION. CLARIFYING SOME THINGS THEY HAD ASKED ABOUT.

RESIDENTIAL OWNERSHIP TODAY. WE ALSO HAVE WESLEY MILLS, OUR CIVIC ENGINEER. WE HAVE OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER. P SWEENEY, DRAFTED THE AGREEMET. THAT IS HERE. WE HAVE MARCUS HADLEY AS WELL. WE SHOULD HAVE FULL COMMITMENT OF TEAM MEMBERS AND LEADERSHIP, TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT I MAY NOT COVER.

WITH THAT, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT I APPRECIATE KEVIN AND MR. GILMORE'S EVENTUALLY -- ALSO, THEIR ENGAGEMENT WITH OTHER AGENCIES. TRYING TO BRING THE BEST MODIFICATION AND PD FOR

[01:15:02]

NORTH OF MIDWAY ROAD. THIS IS THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE LIMITS.

PORT ST. LUCIE TO THE SOUTH OF MIDWAY. WE HAVE ALWAYS ENVISIONED OWNERSHIP. THEY HAVE A LONG TRACK RECORD WITH THIS PROPERTY. THEY HAVE SEEN THIS AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A SOUTHERN GATEWAY. I-95, SOUTHERN GATEWAY FOR THE CITY OF PORT FEARS. -- FORT PIERCE. THIS IS THE CONCEPTUAL PD PLAN.

MIDWAY, I-95. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AS MR. GILMORE POINTED OUT, UP TO 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL AND ENTITLEMENT. SINGLE-FAMILY, MULTIFAMILY. COMPRISING 1590 UNITS. THESE ARE THE PROJECTS MAIN ENTRANCE HEADING NORTH FROM MIDWAY. THIS REPRESENTS MULTI-TOWNHOME OR MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. YELLOW AND 10 COLORS AS YOU GO NORTH AND NORTHEAST, REPRESENT SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. ONE OF THE GREAT ASPECTS OF THIS PROPERTY, IS THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AND PASSIVE COMPONENT. THAT ALSO ENGAGES NORTH OF OUR BOUNDARY, FROM THE STORM WATER TREATMENT AREA FOR THE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. AT THIS POINT, TWO PHASES. THIS ONE SHOWN IN GREEN. PHASE TWO. AS FAR AS TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION, TO THESE QUESTIONS, WHICH I WILL GET TO, THE MAIN ENTRANCE IS PROPOSED OFF OF MIDWAY ROAD. WE ARE GOING TO RECONFIGURE THE ALIGNMENT OF ARTERIAL A. SOUTH OF MIDWAY, YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE RIGHT CIRCLE IS AT THAT POINT. WILDER PARKWAY. THIS RUNS THROUGH THE PROJECT THAT IS FORMALLY KNOWN AS LTC BRANCH WEST. NOW, WILDER DEVELOPMENT.

THE DEVELOPER, ALREADY CONSTRUCTING PHASE ONE. THIS WAS ALL CUT OFF ABOUT HALF WAY NORTH. THEY WILL SOON BE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. ALREADY BEEN CLEARED FOR PHASE TWO. THIS WILL BE INTO THAT RED DOT NEXT YEAR. IS ONE OF OUR COMMITMENTS. THIS IS CONSTRUCTION IN PORT ST. LUCIE COUNTY. THIS GOES TO THE NORTHWEST BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY. THAT ALIGNMENT COINCIDES WITH NOT YET ALIGNMENT, FROM THE COUNTY FAIR ROADWAYS OF WEIGHT PROTECTION.

WE ARE PROPOSING THE EAST-WEST PARKWAY. THIS IS TOWARDS I-95.

PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE BALANCE OF THE PROPERTY. WE HAVE THE ESTABLISHED ACCESS. THIS TAKES US FROM THE EAST-WEST PARKWAY SOUTH, TO THE PROPERTIES TO OUR SOUTH TO MIDWAY ROAD. WE ARE ALSO PROVIDING ALTERNATIVE ACCESS POINTS AS WELL. THIS IS WITHIN THE PROJECT. LET'S SEE IF I CAN PREVIOUSLY GO TO A SLIDE. THIS WILL ANSWER THE QUESTION, AND GIVE A LITTLE BIT MORE. THIS ONE WILL WORK. THE WILD DEVELOPMENT, GREENPOINT, DOING THE PROJECT. FROM THE ROAD OBLIGATION, THEY HAVE BEEN OBLIGATED. THIS WILL BE THE CURRENT TAPER DOWN TO TWO LANES. FROM THE ENTRANCE WEST, TAKING IT BACK TO THE MIDWAY SECTION. THEY ARE MOVING FORWARD WITH THAT NEXT YEAR.

[01:20:07]

THESE SANCTIONS. >> THIS IS PART OF THAT.

>> BUSINESS ASSOCIATION WITH THIS PROJECT. THIS IS PART OF THE TAPERING AT THIS POINT. AS WE EXPRESS ARTERIAL WAY AND MIDWAY ROAD, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS ARE ABOUT $400,000. THAT IS PART OF THIS OBLIGATION. ARTERIAL A SECTION, AGREED-UPON AND WORKING WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY, 1.9 MILLION APPLICATION POINTS AS WELL. I WILL GET THROUGH THESE AGAIN.

HAVE A LAND PLANNER, WE ARE LOOKING AT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. WILL THIS GIVE ME THE PRECURSOR?

>> IT IS PART OF THIS ENTIRE PROPERTY HERE. PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO, I'M LOOKING AT THE BOARD CONSIDERATION AS TO THE CONTEXT AND WHERE THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED. WE HAVE LARGE STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS. TREATMENT PONDS, RUNNING EAST.

THIS IS TO THE NORTH. WE CAN CONTROL WHAT THIS PROPOSED WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT. WE ARE HOPEFUL TO WORK WITH PARTNERSHIPS WITH FLORIDA AND OTHERS, TO MAYBE EXPAND THE NORTH OF ELEMENTS. CREATING A LARGER SYSTEM POTENTIALLY. THIS IS PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO. THESE TYPES OF ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES, WE WILL BE BIRDWATCHING, AND LOOKING AT OTHER OPPORTUNITIES AND SO FORTH. YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS IS THE EAST TO WEST ROAD. PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE AMENITY PROGRAM, IS GOING TO BE BUILT.

THAT ALLOWS IMMEDIATE ENGAGEMENT. THIS IS PHASE ONE.

THIS IS A MILE AND A HALF FROM PRIMARY TRAILS. THIS IS RELATIVELY THE SAME. WE HAVE THREE MILES OF TRAILS, UTILIZING THE AMENITY. THIS IS THE VIEWING PLATFORM. YOU CAN AT LEAST ENJOY. RESIDENTS CAN INVOICE -- ENJOY VISUALLY TO THE NORTH. ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE WITH SOUTH FLORIDA. THIS IS EXPANDING TO THE TRAIL SYSTEM. VISUAL IDEAS RELATIVE, LOOKING AT THE PLATFORM. WE HAVE SOME BOARDWALK COMPONENTS.

AND, THE RECREATIONAL ELEMENTS. I AM JUST GOING TO FAST-FORWARD THIS SO THAT WE HAVE A VISUAL IN CASE OF ANY QUESTIONS. THAT CONCLUDES THE PRESENTATION. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

WE HAVE THE FULL TEAM HERE AS WELL.

>> ARTERIAL A, THIS IS A PLAN CONNECTION.

>> THIS IS A PRECURSOR. THIS CONNECTION POINT, ALIGNS WITH CAPTAIN ARIEL -- ARTERIAL A. WE ARE GOING TO CONSTRUCT THE FOUR LANES OF ARTERIAL A, NORTH THROUGH THIS PART OF THE PROPERTY. THIS IS PART OF THE PROPERTY. THAT COINCIDES WITH THE ALIGNMENT THAT WILL BE ADOPTED OR SHOULD BE ADOPTED WITHIN THE COUNTY. THEY ARE HEADING NORTH. THIS IS ALL THE

WAY TO INJURY. >> THANK YOU.

>> SURE. >> CAN YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE EMERGENCY ACCESS POINT? WHERE WOULD THE ENTRY BE FEASIBLE FROM? THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT COMPLETELY CONSTRUCTING ELEMENTS DOWN THAT WAY, RIGHT?

>> YES SIR, MR. CHAIR. MIDWAY, OBVIOUSLY, EAST TO WEST ROADWAY

[01:25:08]

THIS IS ALREADY BRINGING CONNECTION RIGHTS TO THE PROPERTY AND THE SOUTH. ALL THE WAY TO MIDWAY ROAD RIGHT HERE.

AS WELL AS THE EASEMENT ALL THE WAY BACK TO THIS CUL-DE-SAC HERE AS WELL. WE HAVE THE MAIN ENTRANCE WHICH IS ONE POINT OF CONNECTION. INTO ANOTHER EASEMENT. PROVIDING EMERGENCY ACCESS, AND SECONDARY ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY.

>> IS THE COMPLETE SECONDARY OF THOSE REACTIONS CONTINGENT ON THE DEVELOPER TO THE SOUTH OF COMPLETING THE PROJECT?

>> THAT I DO NOT KNOW OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. I WILL ASK IF THE TEAM HAS THAT. I CAN BRING THAT FORWARD.

>> PROPERTY IS TO THE SOUTH. THIS IS A STIPULATION FOR THE ACCESS

BEING IN PLACE. >> THANK YOU.

>> I THINK MY FAVORITE FEATURE OF THIS PLAN, IS THE ENVIRONMENTAL WRECK REGION AREA. THE SIZE OF WHAT YOU HAVE COMMITTED TO IN YOUR PLAN, IS VERY IMPRESSIVE. I WAS REALLY HAPPY TO SEE THAT. WE USUALLY GET SOME CONCESSION IN THAT DIRECTION. THE SCALE OF WHAT YOU HAVE PROVIDED HERE, IS VERY IMPRESSIVE. VERY GOOD. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

>> YOU MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT JUNE? PORT ST. LUCIE IS

GOING TO CONNECT TO MIDWAY? >> GREENPOINT DEVELOPERS, THE OWNER AND DEVELOPER OF WILDER, AND THE PROJECT TO THE SOUTH OF US, THEY WILL BE CONSTRUCTING BY EARLY NEXT YEAR, WILDER PARKWAY, CONNECTING TO MIDWAY ROAD. THEY ARE PURSUING AND ADVANCING THE FOUR LANE FROM MIDWAY AHEAD OF THEIR ESTABLISHED TIMEFRAME. THIS WOULD ASSUME THAT THEY WOULD PROBABLY ADVANCE THAT AT THE END OF THIS YEAR, AT THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF NEXT YEAR. I DON'T HAVE THE ESTIMATED TIME OF COMPLETION FOR THAT.

>> BEFORE WE DO ANYTHING FROM MIDWAY, IT WILL CONNECT?

>> THAT IS BASICALLY THE GOAL. THEY ARE ENHANCING AHEAD OF SCHEDULE. THEY WANT TO GET THAT COMPLETION. NOT ONLY THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT, THEY HAVE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE, AT MIDWAY AS WELL.

>> I JUST WANTED TO THROW MY PERSONAL OPINION OUT THERE. I LOVE THIS THING. THE WHOLE IDEA IS GREAT. THIS IS THE FORT PIERCE COMMUNITY. GREAT FOR ANNEXATION OR MONEY COMING IN? THAT IS GREAT. I HAVE SET IN THAT LINE ON MIDWAY ROAD EVERY YEAR. I JUST WORRY THAT WE ARE COUNTING ON SOMEBODY ELSE TO BE DOING SOMETHING ELSE. IT IS JUST HEARTBURN TO ME. ANYBODY

ELSE? >> I APPRECIATE THAT.

>> OTHER THAN THAT, GREAT. >> GREAT.

>> ANY OF THE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

>> I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS. THIS IS ALL ABOUT THE HOUSING.

THIS IS MORE THAN THE PARKS AND TRAILS SYSTEMS. ARE THERE GOING TO BE GREEN SPACES IN BETWEEN? THIS IS GOING TO BE THE TOWNHOUSES IN THE BLUE. ALSO, WHAT ARE THESE SIZE LOTS?

>> THEY GENERALLY ARRANGE THE SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS TWEEN THE 40 AND 64 LOTS. THE PD, ACTUALLY STIPULATES THE MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOME SIZES THAT COULD BE ALLOWED. CURRENTLY, WHAT YOU CAN SEE, IS APPROXIMATELY 40 OR 50 FROM THE LOT. AND THE TOWNHOME PRODUCT. AS FAR AS COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES, WHAT YOU SEE, ALTHOUGH I DIDN'T LABEL THEM, THESE SMALL, PEACH COLORED AREAS, THEY HAVE NEIGHBORHOOD THEY CONVERT, AND THEY HAVE THE CLUBHOUSE POOL.

THEY HAVE GREEN SPACE ASSOCIATED WITH IT. I ALSO

[01:30:01]

>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> ANY OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, I WILL SEND IT BACK TO THE BOARD.

>> A REMINDER, THIS IS ALREADY AN APPROVED PD. THIS IS WHAT WE ARE VOTING ON TODAY. RECOMMENDING APPROVAL ON THE VISION IT WAS HIS REVISION OF THE SITE PLAN.

>> MOTION APPROVED. >> PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>>

[e. Preliminary Plat - Sunrise Residential - 9850 West Midway Road]

>> AT EVENING, CHAIRMAN, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS.

>> SUNRISE PRESIDENTIAL PD. LISTEN BEFORE YOU.

>> APPLICANT IS PROPOSING SUBDIVISIONS FOR THE 516 ACRES.

500,090 PLOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. WE ARE RECENTLY SEEING IT. 516 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES. FUTURE LAND USE. CITY OF FORT PIERCE ZONING. FUTURE LAND USE. SERVICE COUNTY, PORT ST.

LUCIE COUNTY. THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. THIS MIRRORS THE SITE PLAN. THIS IS WHAT YOU HAVE RECENTLY SEEN. THESE ARE THE SPECIFICATIONS IN THIS CITY CHAPTER. 121. OMIT NUMBER TWO.

WE NOW HAVE THE ELECTRONIC SYSTEM. THERE ARE SEVEN CRITERIA. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE WEST WITH ONE CONDITION. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING OF THE FINAL PLAN, THE CITY WILL ADDRESS ALL OF THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE ENGINEERING COMMENTS ON THE CITY DOCUMENT. POSSIBLE ACTIONS OF THE PLANNING BOARD ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN ONE CONDITION, RECOMMENDED DENIAL. THANK YOU.

>> WE CAN PROBABLY MOVE THROUGH THIS ONE PRETTY QUICKLY.

CONSIDERING WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON THIS PLAN REVIEW? SEEING NONE, I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AGAIN. IT IS PRETTY SELF-EXPLANATORY UNLESS THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT WE JUST WANTED TO READ THREE MORE MINUTES. CAN WE TALK ABOUT

MIDWAY ROAD? >> TWO DOWN.

>>

WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I MOVED FOR APPROVAL WITH

ONE CONDITION. >> SECOND.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL, SECOND. MOTION FOR APPROVAL WITH THE ONE CONDITION. THIS IS BY MS. CLEMENS. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>>

[f. Conditional Use with New Construction - Rowe Duplex 1001 Tennessee Avenue]

[01:35:04]

>> IT IS. >> SIX -- 6F PROVIDES

CONSTRUCTION. >> GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS. CONDITIONAL USE CONSTRUCTION FOR ROWE AND DUPLEX. LOCATED SUBJECT PARCEL I.D.

24-15-703-20020-000-20 EX. LOCATED AT 1001 TENNESSEE AVENUE. THE APPLICANT AND OWNER, DAVID ROWE, REQUESTING TO BUILD A RESIDENCE DUPLEX ON ONE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE C 1 OFFICE COMMERCIAL ZONE. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPING, INCLUDING TWO RESIDENTIAL UNITS. BOTH UNITS WILL INCLUDE COVERED ENTRY, TWO BEDROOM, TWO BATHROOM, UTILITY AREA FOR WASHER, DRYER, LIVING ROOM. THE SITE PLAN WILL INCLUDE THREE PARKING SPACES PER UNIT FROM THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SPACES.

TWO PARKING SPACES PER UNIT BY THE CODE. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING ADHERING TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENT OF THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. INSTALLATION OF A BIKE RACK TO ACCOMMODATE UP TO FIVE BIKES. CONDITIN FOR REVIEW, PUBLIC HEARINGS SHALL BE HELD.

ON THE CONDITIONAL USE, THE CITY MAY IMPOSE IN ADDITION TO THOSE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS, EXPRESSLY SPECIFIED TO BE NECESSAY TO PROTECT THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OF THE CITY. THE SUBJECT SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 0.29 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES. LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TENNESSEE AVENUE, AND SOUTH 10TH STREET.

THIS IS THE HIGHLIGHT OF SUBJECT PARCELS. THIS IS SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST, AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICES TO THE NORTHWEST. INCLUDING SOUTH. ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS FOR ONE DUPLEX BUILDING. IT TOTALING 2595 SQUARE FEET. UNIT B, 1297 SQUARE FEET. SIX PARKING SPACES, FIVE BICYCLE SPACES. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO INSTALLING SIDEWALKS ALONG THE PROPERTY OF TENNESSEE AVENUE AND SOUTH 10TH STREET, TO CONNECT. THIS IS AN ELEVATION FOR THE PROPOSED DESIGN. THE INTENDED EXTERIOR COLORS, BAHA AND POLAR BEAR WHITE. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL TREE. THE ONLY EXISTING ADDITIONAL TREES ARE PALMS AND OAKS. ADDING SHRUBS SUCH AS 13, ISLAND FICUS, 21 GREEN, 38 RECLUSIVE BUSH, AND 13 INTRANET. THE GROUNDCOVER, AND NEW IRRIGATION WILL BE INSTALLED. THE APPLICANT DOES MEET THESE CURRENT CITY LANDSCAPING CODES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DUPLEXES.

REQUIRES A MINIMUM THESE ARE THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.

DOCUMENTS HE LAND MAINTENANCE LAND-USE AGREEMENT SHOULD BE REQUIRED. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY SITE CLEARANCE, THE APPLICANT SHOULD COORDINATE WITH THE CITY. REQUIRED MITIGATION THE CITY REALLY RELATED TREES. THIS IS PART OF PROPOSAL FROM THE SITE DEVELOPMENT/CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PROPOSING SIDEWALK ON 10TH STREET AND TENNESSEE AVENUE, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE DETAILS. RIGHT AWAY PERMIT APPLICATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE CITY FROM THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE SIDEWALK INSTALLATION. PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALK, EASEMENT SHOULD BE REQUIRED IN FILE FOR THE PORTION OF 10TH STREET TO TENNESSEE AVENUE THAT CROSSES ONTO THE PROPERTY. STAFF IS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH THE FOUR CONDITIONS. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION, IS MODIFIED APPROVAL, FOR RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL. THANK

YOU. >> THANK YOU, MR. GILMORE. ALL

[01:40:07]

RESIDENTIAL. >> RESIDENTIAL AND SOME OFFICE.

IT IS FLEX IN THAT LOCATION. >> I KNOW THIS NEIGHBORHOOD VERY WELL. THE CORNER LOT, IS OBVIOUSLY SMALL FOR A COMMERCIAL LOTTERY. THE DUPLEXES, A RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX, IS AN ALLOWABLE CONDITIONAL USE.

>> ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?

>> SIDEWALKS, YOU ARE GOING TO CONNECT ON TENNESSEE. CORRECT?

>> YES. >> WHAT HAPPENS AT THE CORNER? I DID NOT SEE THE DRAWING. IS IT SIMILAR TO ACROSS THE

STREET? >> I GUESS SO.

>> WE ARE GOING TO COME ALL THE WAY DOWN. NOTHING TO CONNECT TO ON THE OTHER END OF THE PROPERTY.

>> YES. >> THAT WAS MY ONLY QUESTION,

WAS THE SIDEWALK. >> WE ARE IMPROVING AS WE GO.

>> THAT IS GOOD. >> THAT IS ALL RIGHT. AT THIS POINT, WE WOULD LIKE THE APPLICANT TO COME FORWARD AND PRODUCE THEMSELVES -- INTRODUCE THEMSELVES. I DON'T THINK WE WILL NEED YOU APPEAR VERY LONG.

>> MY NAME IS DAVID ROWE. I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT, AND I HAVE BEEN BORN HERE MY WHOLE LIFE. THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN IN MY FAMILY CLOSE TO 60 YEARS. WE ARE JUST NOT TAKING THE OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP IT. FINALLY PUTTING IT TO GOOD USE.

>> I THINK SPECIFICALLY WOULD BE VERY PLEASED TO SEE THAT YOU ARE PROVIDING MORE PARKING THAT IS REQUIRED ON SITE.

>> PARKING COMMITTEE TOGETHER. I LIKE THIS PLAN. I THINK IT IS A VERY GOOD PLAN. IT IS A VERY GOOD USE FOR THE PROPERTY. LIKE I SAID, I KNOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD FAIRLY WELL. EVEN A LOT OF THE COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES KIND OF LOOK LIKE HOMES. I JUST THINK THAT IN VISION OF WHAT YOU ARE DOING HERE, IS GOING TO BE KIND OF CONTINUOUS WITH THE REST OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS.

>> TURNED OVER TO THE BOARD. >> ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS, FOR THE APPLICANT? HEARING NONE, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME FOR BEING HERE TODAY. WE WISH YOU LUCK WITH YOUR PROJECT. ARE THERE ANY OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE, WE WILL SEND IT BACK TO THE BOARD. ONE LAST CHANCE. NO MORE COMMENTS. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

>> IMO FOR APPROVAL WITH THE LISTED CONDITIONS.

>> SECOND. >> ALL RIGHT. -- FOUR CONDITIONS. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.

>>

[g. Site Plan - Asphalt Plant - 4060 Selvitz Road]

PRESENTATION. >> ALL RIGHT. AFTERNOON, AGAIN.

TODAY, BEFORE YOU, WE HAVE AN ASPHALT SITE PLAN APPLICATION.

4060 SELVITZ ROAD. THE ETM SOLUTIONS LLC. ROBBER BAYER MANAGER. PROPERTY OWNER, WANDA JOHNSON. 2230004. 0006. SITE PLAN TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN CREDIBLE ASPHALT PLANT.

APPROXIMATELY 325,937 SQUARE FEET. PARCELS AGAIN AT 4060 SELVITZ ROAD. PARCEL HAS A TOTAL ACRES OF 12.79. HOWEVER, ONLY 12.748 OF THOSE ACRES, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ALTHOUGH

[01:45:03]

HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW. OUTLINED, I SHOULD SAY. FUTURE LAND USE, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. HEAVY, INDUSTRIOUS, I-3. HERE IS THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED. I DO APOLOGIZE FOR THE VIEWERS IF IT IS TOO SMALL. TYPICALLY ON THE SITE PLAN, IT HAS BEEN HIGHLIGHTED FOR THINGS TO BE PLACED ON THE ASPHALT PLANT.

THIS WOULD INCLUDE A FUEL TANK, OIL TANK, WASH STATION, STORAGE SHED, AND CONVEYOR, TO SHARE A FEW. NEW PHOTOS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, THE MACHINERY IS GOING TO BE USED ON THE ASPHALT PLANT. THERE IS A ROUTE PLAN, SHOWCASED IN HOW THE TRUCKS WILL BE ENTERING THE ASPHALT PLANT. WE ARE PROVIDING THE SCREENSHOT. TRAVELING NORTH OR SOUTH ON SALVAGE ROAD. THEY WILL TURN DOWN THE THIRD ROW, TO ENTER THE SITE PLAN. THE ENTRY WOULD BE ON THE SIDE. THE TRUKS ARE COMING ALONG THE DIRT ROAD, CIRCLING AROUND, AND COMING BACK OUT. WITH THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS THAT WAS PROVIDED, IT WAS IMPORTANT TO SHARE THE TRAFFIC COUNT. HOURS OF OPERATION WOULD BE TO 6:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. PEAK HOURS, TRAFFIC COUNT, BETWEEN 7:15 AND 8:15 IN THE MORNING, AND 3:15 AND 4:15 IN THE AFTERNOON. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, FOR THE PROPOSED SITE, SHOWCASING A LITTLE BIT OVER 100 TREES TO BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY. OVER HUNDREDS OF SHRUBS, AS WELL AS GROUNDCOVERS. MEETING THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. REQUIREMENT.

EXCUSE ME. WITH THE TWO CONDITIONS, ONE OF THEM IS PRIOR TO ASSURANCE OF THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AND LAND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. SHALL BE APPROVED AND SHALL ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOLLOWING. TWO, LOOKING AT DEFINED DRIVEWAYS, WITH PROPERTY LINES. REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED WITH FINAL CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. STAFF RECOMMENDATION, FOR THE PLANNING BOARD TO REMOVE THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT.

THIS IS PART OF THE CITY COMMISSION. ULTIMATE RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL FOR THE CONDITIONS, RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL.

>> THANK YOU. >> I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY

ACCESS TO THE NORTH. >> GOING BACK TO THE OVERHEAD VIEW. IS THAT THE ACTUAL ROADWAY? IS THAT PART OF THE PROPERTY? I DID DO A LITTLE BIT OF RESEARCH. THERE WASN'T A

[01:50:01]

>> IT IS A ROADWAY, MAINTAINED BY THE MUNICIPALITY IN THE

COUNTY? >> THERE IS NOT A NAME FOR THE

ROAD. >> YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO TALK ON

IT. >> I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS THAT

ROAD OR THE SOUTH ROAD. >> ANY OTHER SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, BEFORE WE INVITE THE KENT UP HERE? LET'S GO AHEAD AND HAVE APPLICANT COME. WE ARE GOING TO FIGURE IT OUT.

>> ENGINEER ON THE JOB. THIS IS REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT. IF YOU DON'T MIND, I WILL GO RIGHT INTO YOUR QUESTION ABOUT ACCESS. TYPICALLY RIGHT NOW, ACCESS TO THE SITE IS AT THE SOUTH ROAD. SOUTH DRIVEWAY. RUNNING ALONG THE BOTTOM EDGE.

THIS LEADS UP TO THE NORTH AND TO THE SITE. WE HAVE BEEN ASKED I BELIEVE BY THE COUNTY, TO USE THE NORTH DRIVEWAY. THIS IS ALSO A PRIVATE ROAD AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY. GAINING ACCESS TO THE SITE. THE APPLICANT MODIFIED HIS ENTRANCE, IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE COUNTY'S REQUEST, GETTING TRAFFIC IN AND OUT FROM THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.

THERE ARE ACCESS POINTS ALONG THAT CURRENT DRIVEWAY.

>> I THINK MY CONCERN WITHIN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS LIKE THIS, HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES, ON A DIRT ROAD, WILL BE ON THEMSELVES FOR THE REGULAR PASSENGER TRAFFIC. THEY KNOW IT WOULD BE DEALT WITH. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CURRENT PLAN IS. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ROADWAY NOW? IT SOUNDS LIKE IT IS ON PRIVATE LAND. IT IS THE ACCESS EASEMENT.

>> CURRENTLY, OWNED BY THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. PRIVATE DRIVE. ACCESS EASEMENT, GRANTS ACCESS TO THE APPLICANT. THIS IS SO THAT THEY CAN USE IT. VIA THE DRAINAGE ACCESS EASEMENT.

>> STILL OWNING THAT OWN PROPERTY.

>> IT IS OWNED. THIS IS DIRT NORTH FROM RIGHT THERE?

>> NORTH OF THE DRIVEWAY PROPERTIES, TO THE NORTH?

>> PUTTING THE MARKER RIGHT NOW. THE APPLICANT OWNS THAT?

>> IF I'M LOOKING AT THAT RIGHT, NO.

>> IS THAT APPLICANT IN THE BACK?

>> THAT IS HOW YOU ARE GOING TO GET TO THAT ROAD.

>> THIS IS WHERE YOU HAVE THE PROPERTY LINE. RIGHT WHERE THE CURSOR IS. TO THE RIGHT OF IT, THAT IS THE ENTRANCE RIGHT NOW.

THAT ROAD IS PAVED. IT IS MAINTAINED BY THE TWO PEOPLE BACK THERE. ONE IS PRECAST. THEY ALREADY HAVE INDUSTRIAL

USE. THEY MAINTAIN IT. >> CAN YOU PLEASE STEP TO THE MICROPHONE AND SPEAK? STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

>> WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE? >> RUNNING THE SITE. WE ARE LOOKING AT THE EASEMENT FROM OUR SITE. THIS IS TO THEIR ASPHALT ROAD. THIS IS NOT DIRT. THIS IS ASPHALT RIGHT NOW. IT SHOULDN'T BE AN ISSUE. AS FAR AS MAINTENANCE GOES, THIS IS PART OF THE AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT THAT EVERYBODY SHARES.

A LITTLE BIT OF THE AMAZEMENT. EQUIPMENT IS COMING OUT. THIS

IS PART OF THE EXCESS. >> MAKE SURE YOU SIGN IN BEFORE

YOU STEP DOWN. >> GOING TO CRACK A WHIP READ

>> ALL RIGHT, DONE. >> THANK YOU.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD?

>> I HAD A CLARIFICATION. THERE WERE MENTIONED HOURS OF OPERATION. I HAVE APPLICANT'S RIGHT HERE, SO THAT HE CAN CONFIRM. THOSE BE THE TYPICAL HOURS OF OPERATION. GIVEN THE

[01:55:06]

>> WE ARE TYPICALLY WORKING 6:00 TO 6:00 DURING THE NIGHT HOURS. YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE PAPER AND -- PAVING GETS DONE.

LESS ON THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. THE D.O.T., SOMETIMES REFERS NIGHT WORK. THIS IS OVER DAY PAYMENT. TRAFFIC DURING THE DAY, VERSUS TRAFFIC IN THE NIGHT. THERE COULD BE SOME 24-HOUR DAYS AND WEEKS. THINGS OF THAT NATURE. THIS IS ANOTHER MATTER OF BASICALLY WHAT CONTRACTS WE WERE GIVEN AND AWARDED. THIS IS JUST PART OF THE ASPHALT BUSINESS, UNFORTUNATELY.

>> THE CLAIMANT THAT WAS PICTURED IS ACTUALLY ON SITE RIGHT NOW. THE PLANT EQUIPMENT IS THERE. THIS IS GOING TO BE IMPLEMENTING IT. THE EQUIPMENT IS ACTUALLY ON SITE RIGHT NOW.

>> THERE WERE JUST SOME ISSUES WITH THE PREVIOUS OPERATOR.

THIS IS WHAT WE ARE DOING TODAY.

>> GOT IT. >> WE TOOK IT OVER. WE ARE TRYING TO MAKE IT DO RIGHT AND GET IN SHAPE.

>> WE HAVE BEEN THERE FOR SIX MONTHS.

>> YOU CAN DO THIS EVERY TIME YOU WOULD LIKE. A LOT OF A DIFFERENT CONDITION. JUST NOTED THAT IT HAS BEEN THERE UNDER OPERATION FOR THREE OR FOUR OF THOSE SIX YEARS. THEY DID IT, IT IS NOT A PREVIEW TO THAT. THEY DID IT. QUITE A FEW PEOPLE. ALREADY IN THE BUSINESS. WE KNOW WHAT WE ARE DOING. WE HAVE BEEN DOING IT FOR QUITE A WHILE. BEEN DOING

IT FOR 36 YEARS. >> HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN

DOING THIS ON SITE? >> ON SITE RIGHT NOW, THE 35 PEOPLE WITH HOW WE ARE RUNNING. TYPICALLY, THREE-MAN OPERATION TO RUN. TRUCK DRIVERS COMING IN AND OUT RATED YOU HAVE YOUR PEOPLE IN THE FIELD THAT ARE LAYING IN THE ASPHALT, THEY DON'T DO ANYTHING BUT THE MANUFACTURING. ON A TYPICAL DAY, YOU ARE EMPLOYING 30 TO 40 PEOPLE BETWEEN TRUCKS AND OPERATORS. THINGS GO RIGHT. WE MIGHT BE OVER TO 80.

>> THIS IS ALL EQUIPMENT. NO PERMANENT STRUCTURE.

>> THIS IS ALL WHEELS. >> YOU TAKE IT BACK ON AND PUT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE IF YOU REALLY NEEDED TO. THIS IS OUR PLAN. IT IS RIGHT THERE. MOST OF THAT EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN SITTING THERE FOR ALMOST TWO YEARS. ON-SITE. WE HAVE JUST BEEN WORKING ON IT SINCE JANUARY, GETTING IT READY FOR THIS DAY.

MOVING FORWARD TO THE NEXT FINAL DAY. READY TO GO TO WORK.

I CAN SEE WHAT THE ASPHALT NEEDED.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THIS IS ALREADY BEEN IN

PLACE. >> I DON'T KNOW IF ANYTHING WAS IN PLACE BEFORE. PART OF THE PROBLEM. THEY MIGHT HAVE PROMISED THE CITY LOTS OF STUFF. MAYBE LOTS OF TIME IS CLICKING. I DON'T REALLY KNOW ON THE WE ARE JUST TRYING TO CLEAN IT UP AND DEFINED IT. ALL OF OUR HOURS WILL BE MOSTLY 6:00 TO 6:00. A LOT OF THE TIME, WE ARE NOT EVEN RUNNING.

[02:00:02]

JUST TO UNDERSTAND A LITTLE BIT OF HOW IT WORKS. WE ARE JUST LOADING OUT. THERE'S NOTHING ABOUT AIR GOING ON AND OFF. IT DUMPS INTO THE TRUCK. THEY GET THEIR MATERIAL, AND THEY GO. IT IS SENT OUT THE DOOR. EVEN WHEN IT IS RUNNING, YOU CAN'T HEAR IT 200 YARDS AWAY. IT IS REALLY A QUIET OPERATION.

>> MY ONLY CONCERNS, ARE ALL THE TRUCKS ON SALVAGE ROAD. YOU DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT.

>> I HEAR YOU. >> WHO OWNS SELVITZ ROAD?

>> THE COUNTY. >> YOUR FRIENDS.

>> I JUST SAID THAT FOR THE AUDIENCE REALLY.

>> I USED TO RUN FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONER.

>> THIS IS THE ROAD. >> KEVIN ASKED ME TO MAKE A STATEMENT ABOUT THE DRAINAGE. THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN IN THE SITE PLAN. DURING THE NEXT STEP, THE DETAILS WILL BE DONE. THERE ARE SOME PROPOSED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PONDS, RELATED TO DRAINAGE. THERE IS THE DISCHARGE OF THE POND. SHOWN CONCEPTUALLY. THIS IS WITH A CONNECTION TO THE CANAL. JUST SOUTH, ALONG TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE. MOST OF THE WAY, THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL DITCH. THAT HAS TO BE ESTABLISHED. THIS WAS ON THE SITE PLAN.

>> ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE APPLICANT? HEARING NONE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. I WILL ASK IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER MEMBERSOF THE PUBLIC I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS PUBLIC AGENDA ITEM. SEEING NONE, I WILL GO BACK TO THE BOARD FOR ANY FINAL COMMENTS. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION AT THIS TIME.

>> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> WE HAVE TWO CONDITIONS.

>> SITTING HERE IN MY HEAD, THINKING.

>> MOTION APPROVED WITH TWO CONDITIONS.

>> SECOND AMENDMENT, BACK SYNONYMOUS. PLEASE CALL THE

ROLL. >>

>> ALL RIGHT. THAT TAKES US THROUGH ALL OF OUR NEW BUSINESS. AT THIS POINT, IN THE MEETING, WE WOULD OPEN UP TO ANY GENERAL COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. FOR THE PLANNING BOARD.

[8. DIRECTOR'S REPORT]

FREEMAN, YOU HAVE THE FLOOR. >> THANK YOU, CHAIR. I DID HAVE SOME EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE CHAIR. JUST IN THE LAST FEW DAYS, REGARDING THE IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT ON LAW ENFORCEMENT.

LOOKING AT ALL THE IMPLICATIONS OF THAT, AND WHAT WE HAVE BEEN HEARING IN THE CITY, REGARDING LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND ALL OF THOSE ASSOCIATED THINGS GOING ON. WHAT YOU DIDN'T KNOW WHEN WE WERE AWARE OF, IS THAT THE CITY WAS WORKING THROUGH THE LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE. WE DON'T HAVE ANY IMPACT FEES FOR THAT PARTICULAR ENTITY. WE WORK THROUGH THOSE. THAT WILL BE TIED OBVIOUSLY TO THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT, ON THE PROVISIONS OF SERVICE. INCLUDING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT.

WE WILL BE BRINGING THAT FORWARD WE WILL BE GIVING YOU THE UPDATE AS IT MOVES FORWARD. WE ARE IN THE FINAL STAGES. WE

[02:05:01]

THEREAFTER, WILL BE COMING BACK WITH RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COMMISSION. I WILL PROBABLY BE PRESENTING THAT, WITHIN THE NEXT MONTH AND A HALF. THIS WILL TO CITY COMMISSION. THAT IS SOMETHING TO BE AWARE OF. I WILL KEEP YOU

UPDATED ON THAT. >> HAS THE POLICE DEPARTMENT PROVIDED CRIME REPORTING STATISTICS, OR ANY OTHER

RESPONSE? >> PRIMARILY BASED ON THE NUMBER OF OFFICERS AND VEHICLES. LEVEL OF SERVICE, AND THE COST OF MAINTAINING THOSE THINGS AND THIS IS A PROPORTIONATE TRUST FUND DEVELOPMENTS. THIS IS THE CONSULTANTS. THEY WILL GO THROUGH AND RATIONALIZE THE COST, AGAINST THE LIKELY AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT THAT IS COMING IN, AND THE IMPACT OF THAT ELEMENT ON POLICE SERVICES.

THAT HAS OFTEN WORKED IN. IT IS A GREAT EXCEL SHEET. THAT IS AS FAR AS IT MEANS TO ME. THEY WILL HAVE SOME NUMBERS THAT COME OUT ON THE BOTTOM OF THAT. I WILL PRESENT THOSE TO THE CITY COMMISSION WITH SOME JUSTIFICATIONS THAT THE CONSULS WILL BE NEEDING TO MAKE IT BASED ON THE STATEMENT

REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPACT FEES. >> THAT IS VERY GOOD NEWS.

>> I LISTENED ALMOST TO THE ENTIRETY OF THE COMMISSION FROM LAST MONDAY. A LOT OF COMMENTS FROM CURRENT AND RETIRED FORT PIERCE POLICE OFFICERS, I'M REALLY VERY INTERESTED TO SEE HOW THIS DEVELOPMENT PROCEEDS.

>> WE ARE HEARING THIS FROM THE CONSULT. THIS WILL OBVIOUSLY BE BASED FROM OTHER IMPACT FEES. THIS IS EITHER ON SQUARE FOOTAGE, OR THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS. RESIDENTIAL UNITS, AND SO FORTH LIKE THAT. WE WILL HAVE SOME DEFINED LEVEL OF

IMPACT FEE CALCULATION. >> FANTASTIC.

>> THE NEXT CITY COMMISSION MEETING, WE HAVE A NUMBER OF ORDINANCES COMING THROUGH. THIS IS THE PLANNING BOARD. THEY ALREADY HAVE HAD A GOOD HAND IN DEFINITIONS BEING REVISED. THIS IS THE LIST OF USES IN THOSE CERTAIN CATEGORIES BEING REVISED THOSE WOULD BE GOING THROUGH TO THE CITY COMMISSION.

WE ARE HOPING TO GET THE COURT OVERLAY, TO COMING BACK TO THE CITY COMMISSION, HOPEFULLY IN SEPTEMBER. THIS IS BACKWARDS AND FORWARDS. PLANNING BOARD, LOOKING AT THE PRESENTATION.

THE PORT DIRECTOR, THE COUNTY, AND SOME OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS. THEY WERE WANTING TO MAKE FURTHER COMMENTS ON THAT.

WE HAVE GONE THROUGH A LOT OF THAT. I'M NOT SURE IT IS GOING TO BE A 100% AGREEMENT WITH EVERYBODY. THIS IS AS CLOSE AS IT IS GOING TO GET. WE ARE WAITING FOR FINAL RESPONSES FROM PROPERTY OWNERS TO COME BACK. HOPEFULLY YOU WILL GET TO SEE THAT FINALIZED IN SEPTEMBER. WE HAVE HAD VERY GOOD PROGRESS ON THE NUMBER OF ELEMENTS. WE HAVE ALL OF THE CODE CHANGES, IN TERMS OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE CITY COMMISSION, AND WHAT THEY WERE KNEADING US TO DO. WE WERE KNEADING THAT PSYCHIC, THAT WE WERE LOOKING. WE WERE PROCESSING A LOT OF THAT, PRIOR TO THIS STRATEGIC PLAN. THIS FITS INTO WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO IN THE CITY. I KNOW THAT YOU CAN SEE THE THREE OR FOUR CHANGES TO THE ORDINANCES, THAT ARE RELATED TO THE CITY COMMISSION. THIS INCLUDES MOVES AND PRIORITIES. YOU WILL SEE THAT GOING FORWARD. MOVED INTO THE NEW PLANNING PROCESS, IN TERMS OF SUBMITTALS COMING THROUGH ONLINE SUBMITTED PROCESSES, WE ARE WORKING THROUGH THAT. STAFF, SPENDING A LOT OF TIME TRAINING AND LEARNING HOW TO OPERATE THAT SYSTEM. THAT IS AN ONGOING THING. IT IS GOING WELL. WE HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED A NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS COMING THROUGH THE SYSTEM. HOPEFULLY THEY DON'T GET LOST SOMEWHERE. WE ARE PROCESSING THOSE. WE HAVE HEARD THAT THE WAITE PARK AND WADE GARDEN, HAS ISSUED A REQUEST TO MOVE FORWARD WITH A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT

DISTRICT. >>

[02:10:02]

>> THAT IS A WAY OF FINANCING THEMSELVES AND PROVIDING FINANCING MECHANISMS. THAT IS GOING TO GO TO CITY COMMISSION IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. WE HAVE REVIEWED THAT AT THE MOMENT. WE HAVE JUST RECENTLY APPROVED AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.

210 UNIT OF U.S. 1, BASED ON LOCAL ACT. ONCE WE HAVE ALL OF THE DOCUMENTATION FOR THAT, I WILL BRING IT TO THE PLANNING BOARD TO KILL YOU IN ON WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. IT IS THE FIRST LIVE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT THAT WE HAVE PROCESSED. IF YOU WEREN'T AWARE, THAT MEANS THAT ANYBODY SUBMITTING UNDER THE ESTIMATED CRITERIA, IF THEY DO THAT, AND THEY COMMIT TO A CERTAIN NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE HOMES WITHIN THAT ELEMENT, THEY DID NOT HAVE TO HAVE ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS, INCLUDING PLANNING BOARD OR CITY COMMISSION. THIS MOVES THROUGH AS WE WOULD PROCESS A MINOR SITE PLAN. I HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THE CODE REQUIREMENTS, WHICH THEY HAVE DONE. WE ARE PROCESSING IT AS A SITE PLAN. UNDER THE R 5 RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY DISTRICT. ONCE THEY MEET ALL OF THOSE, THEY HAVE BEEN PUT THROUGH SOME OF THE REVIEWS ON THAT RING. THEY HAVE MANAGED TO GET THROUGH THAT. WE WILL BRING THAT FORWARD AND SHOW YOU WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. IT IS AN INTERESTING PROCESS. THAT IS

ALL I HAVE. >> SINCE LAST TIME WE SPOKE, I DON'T KNOW OR REMEMBER WHEN IT WAS THAT WE SPOKE ABOUT THIS INTERAGENCY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU WANT TO CALL IT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE COVERED THAT IN A PREVIOUS DIRECTORS REPORT.

>> IS ONGOING. USED TO SOME EFFECT. SUNRISE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. WE PULLED ALL OF THOSE ENTITIES TOGETHER, UNDER THE UMBRELLA AFFECT -- EFFECT OF THE PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS.

THIS IS PART OF THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. THIS WAS SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED BY THOSE ENTITIES. THIS IS IN PARALLEL. THESE ARE A LOT OF THE COMMENTS THAT HAVE COME BACK. THEY COULD TAKE THE COUNT OF ALL OF THESE ELEMENTS HAPPENING IN THOSE ENTITIES .

WE HAVE NOT REALLY BEEN GOOD AT PULLING TOGETHER. ESSENTIALLY, THAT WILL END UP BEING THE TEAM THAT WILL BE ON BOARD. WE HAVE LARGE GUILD ELEMENTS. ALSO, WE ARE IMPLEMENTING ALL OF THIS.

EVERYONE IS GOING TO BE GOOD. MELDING THOSE TOGETHER A LITTLE BIT. THIS INCLUDES TRAFFIC IMPRECATIONS.

>> THIS IDEA IS GOING TO BE GOING FORWARD. WE ARE STARTING TO SEE THE EFFECTS OF IT. THIS IS ESPECIALLY LARGE SCALE THAT ELEMENT. WHEN LOOKING AT THE COUNTY ROADS. ONE HAND NOT KNOWING WHAT THE OTHER IS DOING. THIS IS SPECIFICALLY WHAT WE NEED TO GET OUT OF IT.

>> WE WOULD LIKE TO BE INFORMED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT. THESE ARE THE AREAS THAT ARE AFFECTING THE CITY OPERATIONS.

>> WE ARE MOVING ON TO THE PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS.

>> WHAT ARE WE LOOKING AT THE ELECTRICITY FOR THE WAITE PARK

>>

[02:15:05]

>> THIS IS THE DRAINAGE PARK. GOING TOWARDS THE NEW ORDER

TREATMENT PLAN. >> IS THIS GOING TO END UP TYPING IT TWICE INTO THE NEXT YEAR OR TWO?

[9. BOARD COMMENTS]

>> GOING TO THE DIRECTOR. >> THIS IS ONE OF THE THING

THAT I WANT TO BRING UP >> BACK IN JUNE, THE MEETING I WAS NOT HERE FOR, WAS WHEN I WATCHED IT ONLINE. ONE OF THE ITEMS, WAS LOOKING AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY. WE ARE LOOKING AT THE GHOST RE-EMERGING. WE HAD APPLICANT TODAY, WHICH OBVIOUSLY THEY ARE SHAPING WITH THEIR USE IS GOING TO BE. THEY MENTION SOMETHING THAT CAN BE IN LINE WITH THAT TYPE OF USE. WE WERE STILL IN THE PROCESS. WE ARE LOOKING AT THESE MINUTES. WE HAVE AN APPLICATION, LOOKING AT A BUSINESS LOOKING AT DOWNTOWN. THIS IS WITH A USE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER INCIDENT CODES. WE HAD ARCADES. ARCADES ARE GAMBLING. WE HAVE ESTABLISHMENTS. WE DON'T HAVE A USE FOR THAT. THE ONLY WAY WE COULD GET THEM TO BUILD IT, WAS TO GET THE CONDITIONAL USE. THIS WAS A SPECIFIC, JUST FOR YOU THING. WHAT WE REALIZED DURING THAT PROCESS, THIS IS A VERY APPLICABLE USE FOR ANY KIND OF CITY. IT SEEMS NECESSARY AT THAT POINT TO ADDRESS IT, AT THE PLANNING AND ZONING LEVEL. THAT APPLICANT COULDN'T GET A LEASE AGREEMENT. THEY ARE BACK IN A DIFFERENT BUILDING. THEY HAD TO COME BACK FOR A SEPARATE CONDITIONAL USE. THEY HAD TO GO THROUGH IT TWICE. IN THE MEANTIME, WE ARE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE ESTABLISH THIS AS AN ACCEPTABLE USE FOR OTHER APPLICANTS. ALSO IN THE CITY. WHERE ARE WE ON THAT?

>> IF YOU RECALL, AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WERE HERE AT THAT MEETING, BUT THE DEFINITIONS HAVE BEEN AMENDED TO INCORPORATE THAT USE. ALSO, THE ZONING USE TABLE HAS BEEN INCORPORATED. THAT USE HAS BEEN INCORPORATED IN CERTAIN ZONING DISTRICTS. THAT HAS COME THROUGH THE PLANNING BOARD. I CAN'T GIVE YOU THE MONTH THAT THAT HAS COME THROUGH. THAT IS GOING THROUGH TO AUGUST 19TH. CITY COMMISSION, WILL RESOLVE THE ISSUE THAT YOU ARE TALKING TO READ

>> THAT IS VERY GOOD NEWS. >> THANK YOU.

>> ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD?

>> I HAVE ONE. >> SPEAKING OF SANDRIDGE, IS THERE A STATUS FROM THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT USE THAT IS COMING

UPON SANDRIDGE? >> THAT WAS A SIMILAR ISSUE.

THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE ROADWAY COST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, WANTED TO REQUIRED TO IMPOSE ON THE DEVELOPMENT, AS FAR AS I AM AWARE. WE WOULD BE ABLE TO COME UP WITH AS MANY IMAGINATIVE SOLUTIONS AS WE COULD WITH THAT. THE INTENDED END USER OF THAT PROPERTY, I THINK WAS THE MAIN HOLDUP THAT THEY WANTED THAT ACCESS FROM A CERTAIN LOCATION. THE ALTERNATIVE WOULD NOT SUFFICE. IN MIND, THERE IS THE ALTERNATIVE TO GET AROUND THAT WAY. THIS IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL INTENT IN THAT

DIRECTION. >> ALL RIGHT. SPEAKING ON THE SUBJECT, I DON'T KNOW THAT THEY WILL. THE GENTLEMAN THAT WERE HERE EARLIER WITH THAT APPLICATION, THEY WERE GOING TO SPEAK WITH YOU, I ASSUME BEFORE THEIR ANNEXATION GOES TO THE COMMISSION. FIGURING OUT WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THAT. I AM SPECIFICALLY INTERESTED -- IN THAT APPLICATION. IF THIS ENDS UP NOT WORKING, AND THIS IS THE COUNTY ENCLAVE, COMPLETELY

[02:20:04]

MEETING. >> I HAVE BEFORE. WE DID GO WITH THE OPTIONS THAT THEY COULD DO WHAT THEY WANTED. I THOUGHT THAT WAS RESOLVED. APART FROM THE ROADWAY, WHICH I HAVE LITTLE CONTROL OVER, WITH IT BEING IN THE COUNTY, I THINK THAT IS THE MAJOR HICCUP THAT THEY HAVE ENCOUNTERED.

>> OKAY. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I BELIEVE THAT

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.