Aug 11, 2025 Planning Board

[1. CALL TO ORDER]

[4. CONSIDERATION OF ABSENCES]

[00:00:59]

>> PRESENT. DID MR. EDWARDS HAVE A REASONABLE EXCUSE?

>> MR. EDWARDS CALLED IN WITH A REASONABLE EXCUSE AND MISS CLEMENS IS ENTERING THE MEETING NOW.

>> SPEAKING OF MS. CLEMENS, I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR COVERING THE CHAIR SEAT LAST MONTH WHILE MY FAMILY AND I WERE ON

[5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM OUR JULY MEETING. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? I'M HEARING NONE. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

>> MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS TYPED.

>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES BY MR. COLLINS, SECONDED BY MS. CARTER. PLEASE

CALL THE ROLE. >> MR. JOHNSON?

>> YES. >> MS. CARTER?

[a. PZANN2025-00001 Annexation MRM Ventures Parcel ID: 2421-233-0001-000-2]

>> YES. >> MR. COLLINS?

>> YES, MA'AM. >> THIS CLEMENS? MR. WHITING?

CHAIR? >> YES. LET'S MOVE ON TO NEW BUSINESS. WE HAVE ITEM 6A, ANNEXATION.

>> GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS. BEFORE YOU WE HAVE AN ANNEXATION APPLICATION BY MRM VENTURES FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CORTEZ BOULEVARD AND SOUTH 25TH STREET. PARCEL I.D. 2421-233-0001-000-TW O. THE APPLICANT OWNER IS TIM MORLEY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS A FUTURE LAND USE, COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE OF RU, RESIDENTIAL URBAN. CLASSIFIED AS RS4 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. AND THE APPROXIMATE TAXABLE VALUE IS $839,000 .

BEFORE YOU IS A CITY LIMITS LOCATION MAP. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PARCEL IS HIGHLIGHTED IN THE GREEN. IT SITS IN THE MIDDLE OF A HUGE ENCLAVE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS . THE EXISTING CITY AND COUNTY ZONING SURROUNDING THE PARCEL, AS YOU CAN SEE, IS R2, R1, RS4 BY THE COUNTY AND RM NINE BY THE COUNTY AS WELL. THE SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USES ARE IN THE CITY, WAS HIS VILLAGES WHICH IS RESIDENTIAL. AND A RU RESIDENTIAL URBAN IN THE COUNTY.

THIS IS THE MAXIMUM BUILDOUT POTENTIAL GOING FROM THE RU RESIDENTIAL URBAN FUTURE LAND USE TO THE RL LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE FOR THE CITY. IT WOULD INCREASE A POTENTIAL INCREASE OF 12 UNITS . ALL AFFECTED IF -- DEPARTMENTS FOR ANNEXATION WITH CONSISTENCY WITH REQUIREMENT OF THE CITY CODE AND CONFERENCE OF PLAN. THE STAFF OR COMMENCE APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION . ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS OF THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH CHANGES OR RECOMMEND DISAPPROVAL. THANK

YOU. >> THANK YOU, MR. GILMORE. ANY DISCUSSION? COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD? I'M HEARING NONE. I WOULD ONLY JUST POINT OUT , IF YOU COULD GO BACK, MR. GILMORE ,

TO THAT ZONING MAP. >> YEAH. THAT ONE, RIGHT THERE.

[00:05:06]

HEARING NONE. >> I WOULD AGREE. THAT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. SEEMS LIKE WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

>> THANK YOU, MR. COLLINS. IF THERE'S NO FOR THE DISCUSSION AT THIS TIME WE CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

>> I MOVE FOR APPROVAL. >> SECOND.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY MS. CLEMENS, SECOND BY MR.

COLLINS. PLEASE CALL THE ROLE. >> WAS CARTER? MR. COLLINS? MS. CLEMENS? MR. WIDING? MR. JOHNSON? CHAIR KREISL?

[b. PD2024-00007 Zoning Atlas Map Amendment Cornerstone Master Planned Development 2721 S. Jenkins Road]

>> MOVING ON. ITEM 6B. ZONING ATLAS MAP AMENDMENT.

>> AFTERNOON , CHAIRMA. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS. BEFORE YOU WE HAVE A ZONING ATLAS MAP AMENDMENT TO REZONE TO A MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR -- CORNERSTONE LOCATED AT 2721 SOUTH JENKINS ROAD . PARCEL I.D. 2024-00007 AND -- THE APPLICANT, LESLIE OLSON OF THE DISTRICT PLANNING GROUP , OWNER, KATHY MCGRANE, CORNERSTONE FT. PIERCE DEVELOPMENT LLC. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO 50 SAMPLE UNIT -- RESIDENTIAL MASTER-PLANNED COMMUNITY WITH A RANGE OF HOME SIZES, DESIGNS, AMENITIES SUCH AS THE PARK CONNECTING THE RECREATIONAL AREA. ADDITIONAL -- FRAME FOR THE NEW NEIGHBORHOOD , 95. ON NOVEMBER 3RD, 2008, CITY COMMISSION APPROVED A SITE PLAN 383,605 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT , CONSISTING OF EIGHT BUILDINGS. NEWBERRY FIELDS, THE ANCHOR TENANT FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOP IT WAS A TARGET RETAIL STORE. ON DECEMBER 9TH, 24, THE PLANNING BOARD REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE CONCURRENT AMENDMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED TO CHANGE A FUTURE LAND USE TO RM MEDIUM DENSITY .

THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 49.92 ACRES. THIS IS A ZONING MAP , WHICH IS C3, CURRENTLY.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AS WELL AS APD TO THE EAST. TWO PD'S. THIS IS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USES. WE HAVE GC, RM . BEFORE YOU IS THE GENERAL SITE PLAN , MASTER-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN. FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TWO PHASES. AS YOU CAN SEE, PHASE ONE, HIGHLIGHTED IN RED. PHASE TWO, HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE. 250 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, A VARIETY OF HOME SIZES . WHICH STARTS FROM THE RECREATIONAL AREA AND HEADS TOWARD THE SOUTHERN END TO THE POCKET PARK . A POOL, RECREATIONAL PLAYGROUND AREA AND A PUBLIC IDENTITY FEATURE , WHICH WILL BE FAR SOUTH.

SOUTHWESTERN CORNER. THIS IS THE SITE DATA FOR THIS PROPOSED MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TWO TYPES. 144 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM . AND LOT TYPE BE , 3300 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM. MAXIMUM DENSITY , FIVE UNITS. THE APPLICANT HAS

[00:10:07]

A MEANDERING OF ONE THIRD OF A MILE LONG WALKING PATH LINES WITH RESTING STOPS OVERLOOKING LAKE VISTAS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER AND DETERMINANTS OF THE PARK LIES A POCKET PARK WHERE SCULPTURAL ART INSTALLATIONS ARE PROPOSED. ALSO, THE SITE IS DESIGNED WITH NETWORK STREETS WHICH HAVE BEEN DESIGNED -- ADJACENT TO 95. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS , IT IS ESTIMATED THE TOTAL WEEKDAY DAILY WILL BE 2003 TO 36 TOTAL. AND OF THE PEAK HOURS , THE HIGHEST PEAK WOULD BE THE P.M. ENTRY AT 147. AN ANALYSIS WAS PREPARED FOR PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING BY TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY CONSULTANTS. THIS ANALYSIS WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY ON AUGUST 5TH FOR CONSIDERATION FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL. ALL AFFECTED DEPARTMENTS HAVE PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS MAP AMENDMENT MASTER-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN REGARDS TO CONSISTENCY WITH ESTABLISHED ORDINANCES , RECURRENCE OF CITY

CODE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLANS. >> CHAIR, LET ME GIVE YOU A BIT OF A SUMMARY ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON BEHIND THE SCENES WITH THIS APPLICATION. WE HAVE TWO INTERESTED PARTIES HERE. WE HAVE APPLICANT AND THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNER WHO HAS PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND PROPOSES SOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE. THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, ONLY TO THE NORTH, HAS REQUESTED THE COUNTY TO CONSIDER A FULL ACCESS FROM JENKINS TO BOTH HIS PROPERTY AND THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. WE KNOW THAT NEGOTIATIONS HAVE BEEN UNDERTAKEN BETWEEN THOSE PARTIES AND THE COUNTY . AND WE REQUESTED INPUT FROM THE COUNTY TO SETTLE OUT WHAT THEY WILL BE ALLOWED TO DO THERE. CITY STAFF ARE NOT TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS. WE DON'T DESIGN ROADWAY ISSUES WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO COUNTY ROADWAYS. WE ARE DEPENDENT ON THE COUNTY COMING BACK AND EITHER AGREEING OR NOT AGREEING TO THIS FULL ACCESS FOR THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. SO WHAT WE WOULD LIKE IS FOR THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND THE APPLICANT TO BE SPEAKING ON THIS AND WHERE THEY ARE . AS I SAY, WE DON'T HAVE A RESPONSE YET FROM THE COUNTY. TO PRESENT TO YOU TO FULLY ANALYZE YOUR DETERMINATION ON THAT. WE WERE EXPECTING THAT TO BE FORTHCOMING BEFORE THE MEETING .

IT HAS NOT BEEN. I THINK WHAT OUR STAFF WOULD LIKE IS TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AND THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNER , AND THEN RECOMMEND AN ACTION SUBSEQUENTLY TO THAT IF THE

BOARD WOULD ALLOW THAT. >> BOTH THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY

AND THE APPLICANT HERE TODAY? >> YES.

>> OKAY. >> I THINK THAT WOULD GIVE THE BOARD A BETTER PERSPECTIVE ABOUT SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT HAVE

BEEN FACED BY BOTH PARTIES HERE. >> SURE.

>> THANK YOU, MR. GILMORE AND MR. FREEMAN. INITIAL REACTIONS,

COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? >> I WILL WAIT TO HEAR THE

PRESENTATIONS. >> I AGREE. I THINK WE CAN JUMP RIGHT IN. MR. WIDING, DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING?

>> LET'S LISTEN. >> ALL RIGHT. IF THE APPLICANT WOULD, AT THIS TIME, LIKE TO COME FORWARD. MS. OLSON, GOOD TO SEE YOU AGAIN. PLEASE SIGN IN AND WE WILL SEE THE

PRESENTATION. >> OKAY. GOT IT.

[00:15:10]

>> THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, CHAIR KREISL . MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING BOARD. MY NAME IS LESLIE OLSON. THE PRINCIPLE OF DISTRICT PLANNING GROUP AND I AM PROUD TODAY TO BE REPRESENTING -- HOME COMPANY . THEIR PROPOSAL FOR CORNERSTONE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. AND THIS IS OUR MASTERS. THIS IS OUR FIRST STAGE WHERE WE COME IN AND GET OUR REZONING. IT'S A BIG TEAM.

IT TAKES A VILLAGE TO GET A PLAN DEVELOPMENT DONE. I WOULD LIKE TO QUICKLY INTRODUCE THEM. WE HAVE CARLSON . LEE DOBBINS IS DIRECTED BEHIND ME. AND I HAVE TO SAY, ALSO, THE 2025 RECIPIENT OF THE LEADERSHIP AWARD. I WILL PROBABLY STOP REFERRING TO HIM THAT WAY ONE DAY. BUT NOT ANYTIME SOON. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE LUKE LAMBERT WITH TMC TRAFFIC. WE WILL HAVE HIM AVAILABLE FOR YOU FOR QUESTIONS. TODD TROXEL DID OUR SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, AND ALL OF THE INNOVATION THAT GOES ON IN THERE. LET'S SEE, WHO ALSO I MISSING? THAT'S MOSTLY IT. AND WE'VE GOT SOME OTHER FOLKS TOO. I'M GOING TO TRY TO KEEP IT SHORTER. I WANT TO JUST ORIENT YOU. YOU'VE ARTIE SEEN THIS. WE ARE AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF OKEECHOBEE AND 95 ACROSS THE STREET FROM AVALON CROSSING. YOU CAN SEE ALL OF THOSE RIGHT BEHIND CHIPOTLE. THAT SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION, BACK THERE. WE ARE RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THAT. JUST TO THE NORTH OF VIVA WEST IF YOU RECALL THAT SITE PLAN COMING THROUGH. AND THEN, TO THE NORTH, AS MENTIONED, IS A COMMERCIAL SITE . WE ARE WORKING CLOSELY TOGETHER BECAUSE THEIR SITE NEEDS ACCESS TO OUR SITE. SO WE HAVE BEEN WORKING VERY COLLABORATIVELY WITH THEM. YOU CAN SEE GOING ON AROUND US. I'M GOING TO HAVE LEE DOBBINS COME OUT NOW AND TALK A LITTLE BIT

ABOUT THE PROCESS. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. FOR THE RECORD, LEE DOBBINS WITH THE LAW FIRM HERE IN FT. PIERCE. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK STAFF FOR ALL THEIR HARD WORK ON THIS. I JUST WANT TO TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO TALK ABOUT THE BIG PICTURE ON IT. I THINK IT'S ALWAYS HELPFUL. THIS PROJECT REQUIRES BOTH A FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND ALSO A ZONING CHANGE TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THIS PROJECT WAS BEFORE YOU AT THE END OF LAST YEAR FOR THE LAND-USE AMENDMENT. THE BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL UNANIMOUSLY AT THAT HEARING. SO NOW WE ARE COMING BEFORE YOU WITH THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT FUTURE LAND-USE AMENDMENT. THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT IS IN TWO STEPS. WE ARE BEFORE YOU FOR THE MASTER TODAY. WE WILL BE COMING BACK TO YOU FOR THE FINAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL HOPEFULLY IN SEPTEMBER . THERE'S ALSO A PD AGREEMENT, WHICH IS PART OF THIS. THAT IS PART OF THE CITY CODE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS THAT YOU HAVE AN AGREEMENT, WHICH IS APPROVED AS PART OF THE PROCESS, WHICH SPELLS OUT DETAILS WITH RESPECT TO STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL . THAT IS REQUIRED BY THE CODE, AS I SAID, THAT'S PART OF THE PACKAGE FOR THIS. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE MASTER PD.

ULTIMATELY, THE FINAL PD AND THE SITE PLAN WITH IT AND THE PD AGREEMENT WILL ALL GO BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION FOR FINAL APPROVAL. THAT'S THE PROCESS. ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT? I WILL TURN IT BACK OVER TO LESLIE. THANK YOU.

>> THIS SITE IS INTERESTING. BECAUSE OF ITS HIGH VISIBILITY , WHEN WE WERE IN OUR INITIAL TALKS WITH KEVIN AND HIS TEAM WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT WOULD MAKE THIS SITE SPECIAL. BECAUSE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHOULD HAVE AN ASPECT TICKET SHOULD BE MORE THAN JUST YOUR BASIC SUBDIVISION. SO WHAT WE LOOKED AT WAS WHAT MADE THIS PARTICULAR SITE SPECIAL. HOW CAN WE MAKE THIS PLAN DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL? THE STATE 'S INTERMODAL SYSTEM, I-95, THE TURNPIKE , IT HAS A LOT OF VISIBILITY FROM I-95. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT FT. PIERCE CURRENTLY LACKS IS A GREAT ENTRANCE FEATURE INTO THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE. WHAT WE HAVE DECIDED TO DO IS INCORPORATE THAT IDENTITY FEATURE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER . BASICALLY, RIGHT WHEN YOU HIT THE ON RAMP

[00:20:04]

ALSO, THE CREATION OF ADDITIONAL HOUSING IN THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION IS VERY IMPORTANT . THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE HAS IDENTIFIED THE KINGS HIGHWAY CORRIDOR OR AS A JOBS ATTRACTOR.

CAPITAL IS IN THE PROCESS OF DOING AN ENTITLEMENT TO CREATE A CLASS A COMMERCE PARK ON KINGS HIGHWAY THAT WILL BASICALLY FILL THE NEED FOR OUR SMALL TO MIDSIZED BUSINESSES THAT NEED TO EXPAND. WE ARE LOOKING AT A LOT OF GROWTH HAPPENING THERE AND WE NEED PLACES FOR THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO WORK OUT IN THIS KINGS HIGHWAY TO GET THERE QUICKLY. WE THINK THIS IS A GREAT SITE. AT FIVE UNITS PER ACRE WE ARE GOING TO BE GENERATING 80% LESS TRAFFIC THAN THE FORMER FUTURE LAND-USE .

THIS IS A VERY ACTIVE DESIGNED COMMUNITY TREE-LINED STREET . A VERY ROBUST NATURE TRAIL WITH LOTS OF LANDSCAPING. MAKING THIS A NATURALLY OCCURRING , ACTIVE COMMUNITY. THE SITE REALLY LENDS ITSELF TO A GRID PATTERN FOR WALK ABILITY WITH A FRAME TO TREE-LINED STREETS . ALL INTERCONNECTED. EACH ROAD IS INTERCONNECTED WITH A NATURE TRAIL THAT BUFFERS THE HOMES FROM I-95. EACH ONE OF THOSE GRAY AREAS -- FROM YOUR BASIC GRASS SWALE INTO A RAIN GARDEN THAT CAPTURES NUTRIENTS AND ADDS VISUAL BEAUTY WITH GRASSES AND WET LOVING TREES. GREAT FOR UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS. YOU CAN ALSO SEE ON THE SLIDE, THE NORTHERN ENTRANCE, CLOSEST TO OKEECHOBEE. YOU'LL SEE THAT LITTLE DOGLEG THAT COMES OFF OF OUR ENTRANCE AND GOES TOWARDS THE COMMERCIAL SITE. THAT WILL BE A SHARED ENTRANCE. THEY ARE SO CLOSE TO THE INTERSECTION . IT'S VERY, VERY DIFFICULT FOR THEM TO GET THE KIND OF ACCESS THEY NEED FOR COMMERCIAL THERE.

THEY ARE ADVOCATING FOR FULL ACCESS AT THAT NORTHERN SITE AND WE ARE STILL IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY ON THE .

WE CAN TELL YOU MORE ABOUT WHY WE BELIEVE WE MEET THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR FULL ACCESS. IN ADDITION, IT ALIGNS WITH CLEMENTINE JUST TO THE EAST THERE. AND THAT IS THE ACCESS POINT FOR AVALON. IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT FOR BOTH COMMITTEES FOR THAT TO BE A FULL ACCESS ONCE IN JENKINS ROAD IS WIDENED AS THE COUNTY PLANS TO DO. ANOTHER THING THAT WE DO TO AID THE COUNTY IN THEIR ACCESS MANAGEMENT IS TO ALIGN A SECONDARY ENTRANCE. WE WERE ORIGINALLY PLANNING ON HAVING A SECOND ENTRANCE. AND , ACTUALLY, WE WILL PROBABLY BUILD THIS ONE FIRST. ACCORDING TO OUR PHASING PLAN. BUT THIS SOUTHERN ENTRANCE, HERE, ALIGNS WITH CLASSICAL ACADEMY. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'LL RECALL, THAT IS A NEW CHARTER SCHOOL THAT IS EXPANDING. NOW THEY ARE UP TO HIGH SCHOOL. THEY STARTED WITH ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE. NOW THEY ARE UP TO HIGH SCHOOL. WHEN THEY LOCATED AT THAT CHURCH SITE IT WAS A LITTLE TIGHT FOR SINGLE WARNING. AND US ALIGNING OUR SITE WITH THEIRS, OUR ACCESS WITH THEIRS MEANS THAT YOU WILL NEED A SIGNAL THERE PROBABLY. IT LOOKS LIKE A SIGNAL IS WARRANTED AND WE WILL BE CONTRIBUTING TOWARDS THAT AS WELL. I SAID A LOT OF THIS . SO I WANT TO GO BACK OVER IT. RAIN GARDENS, THIS IS WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH A DRY DETENTION AREA WITH A LITTLE MORE CREATIVITY. SO THANKS TO TODD. ALSO GREAT FOR NUTRIENT UPTAKE FOR WATER QUALITY. A REALLY NICE DESIGN FOR NARROW STREETS , WHICH IS A NATURAL TRAFFIC CALM HER. SHADED SIDEWALKS . WHEN YOU HAVE STREETS THAT ARE NARROW LIKE THIS IT MAKES IT EASIER FOR KIDS TO PLAY IN THE STREET, WHICH IS A GOOD THING. IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD YOU WANT THEM TO BE ABLE TO PLAY IN THE STREET. WITH

[00:25:04]

>> MY FIRST ONE IS TIED TO THE SCHOOL BUS STOP THAT HAS GONE TO THE COUNTY. THEY LIKE THAT LOCATION?

>> YES. WE DID DISCUSS THIS WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD. THERE IS AN

EASY LOOP IN AND OUT. >> THERE'S ONE STOP. FAIR SIZE.

IT LOOKS DEEP. YOU ARE GETTING MULTIPLE BLOCKS GOING TO THE PROPERTY. THERE IS ONE STOP AT THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT.

>> THE SCHOOL BOARD DOESN'T LIKE MULTIPLE STOPS IN THE DEVELOPMENT. THEY WANT THE KIDS TO WALK THERE.

>> THAT WAS A QUESTION IF THEY ARE COMFORTABLE WITH THAT.

>> THEY HAVE A HARD ENOUGH TIME GETTING ALL THE KIDS TO SCHOOL ON TIME. THEY WANT TO ADD ONTO THAT TIME AT ALL.

>> IS THAT CUT IN STONE? >> NO.

>> OKAY. THE 14 CONDITIONS THAT WE HAVE, DOES ONE OF THEM

INCORPORATE THE BUS STOP? >> ACTUALLY, BOTH THE APPLICANT AND STAFF SPENT CONSIDERABLE TIME DISCUSSING THE BUS STOP LOCATION, THE ACCESS AND IT'S PROVISIONED INCORPORATING THE MASTER PLAN . THE INSTALLATION ON THE MASTER PLAN, THEY WILL NOT BE RECEIVING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY UNLESS THAT SCHOOL BUS

STOP IS PROVIDED. >> THE LOCATION OF THE BUS STOP, THE ACCESS IS CONTINGENT UPON THE AGREEMENT WITH YOUR NEIGHBOR TO THE NORTH. CORRECT? SO THE INTENTION IS FOR THE BUS TO ENTER THROUGH THE NEIGHBORS PROPERTY, DRIVE ONTO YOUR PROPERTY TO ACCESS THE BUS STOP. IF THE AGREEMENT WITH THE NEIGHBOR DOES NOT WORK DO YOU HAVE SOME KIND OF BACKUP PLAN ?

>> THERE IS ANOTHER WAY TO ROUTE THE BUS THROUGH THIS . AS YOU CAN SEE, ON THIS PARTICULAR SCREEN THAT IS PULLED UP , IF A BUS CAME IN AND WENT NORTH TO THE TURNING POINT HERE AND AROUND THE BLOCK THEY CAN DO THAT TOO. I THINK THEY WOULD PREFER TO DO IT THE OTHER WAY. BUT REASON, THE NORTHERN PARCEL DOESN'T DEVELOP THERE IS ANOTHER WAY TO DO IT.

>> MY CONCERN IS THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AND EVERYTHING YOU DISCUSSED AS FAR AS THE BUS STOP IS CONCERNED IS IN PHASE TWO AS OPPOSED TO PHASE ONE, WHICH IS THE OF THE RESIDENTIAL.

>> YESTERDAY I NOTICED THAT TOO. WE WILL PUT THIS PORTION INTO

[00:30:03]

PHASE ONE. >> I THINK THERE'S SOMETHING

YOU MAY WANT TO CONSIDER. >> YES, MA'AM.

>> I THINK THIS IS GETTING VERY BUSY .

>> UNDERSTOOD. THANK YOU. >> IF THE COMMERCIAL ENTERS THROUGH ITS OWN PROPERTY WILL IT ALSO HAVE SOME ICE, BOX TRUCKS, THINGS LIKE THAT GOING THROUGH RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ? AND IF SO, IS THERE GOING TO BE TIME LIMITS OF WHEN THEY CAN ACCESS?

>> SO WE HAVE DESIGNED THE SITE SO THAT NO HOUSES WILL FACE THAT ROAD WHERE THE COMMERCIAL CAN GO BACK AND FORTH ON THE PROPERTY.

IT IS THE INTENT THAT THERE WILL BE SOME ACCESS ON THEIR PROPERTY AS WELL. THEY CAN DO A RIDE IN, RIDE OUT ON THEIR OWN PROPERTY.

INCLUDING COMMERCIAL BOX TRUCKS. I DON'T THINK HAS BEEN NEGOTIATED YET BETWEEN THE CONTRACT BUYER AND THE OWNER OF THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY EXACTLY HOW THAT WOULD WORK YET. THAT WE HAVE TRIED TO DESIGN IT SO THAT IT WILL HAVE AS LITTLE IMPACT ON

THE HOMEOWNERS AS POSSIBLE. >> SO THE BUS STOP IS RIGHT THERE AND THERE'S COMMERCIAL VEHICLES GOING THROUGHOUT IT.

>> THE BUS STOP IS TALKED IN A LITTLE POCKET AREA, THERE. THERE WILL BE NO NEED FOR CHILDREN TO WALK ON THAT ROAD IN ANY WAY.

THAT COMMERCIAL SITE IS SMALL. I HOPE THAT THEY ARE VERY SUCCESSFUL. BUT EVEN AT THEIR MOST SUCCESSFUL, THAT'S NOT GOING TO CREATE A MALL LIKE COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC. IT'S GOING TO PROBABLY BE A RESTAURANT OF SOME SORT . THEY WILL HAVE AN ACCESS EASEMENT THROUGH OUR PROPERTY. THEY HAVE TO ACCOMMODATE THAT IN SOME WAY. THIS IS HOW THEY WILL ACCOMMODATE IT TO BE LEAST IMPACTFUL TO THE RESIDENTIAL

COMMUNITY. >> I KNOW THAT YOU HAVE THE BUFFER. WILL THERE POTENTIALLY BE A STIPULATION FOR A WALL OR FENCE TO SEPARATE THE TWO? OR WOULD ONLY BE BUFFERS BETWEEN

YOURSELF AND THE COMMERCIAL? >> THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I CAN REMEMBER. IF WE HAVE A WALL.

>> IF THAT COMES INTO PLAY , RIGHT HERE ALONG 23 AND 15.

>> WE WERE PROPOSING LANDSCAPE AT THIS POINT. HEAVY LANDSCAPE

BUFFER. YOU CAN SEE THERE. >> I HAVE A QUESTION.

>> YES, MA'AM? >> AS FAR AS THE ACCESS AND PROVIDING THE SECONDARY PROPERTY , AND EASEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY , DOES IT HAVE TO BE DESIGNED THIS WAY IN ORDER FOR THE ACCESS TO OCCUR? CAN IT BE DESIGNED DIFFERENTLY? WHY DID YOU CHOOSE THIS DESIGN AND CHOOSE COMMERCIAL ACCESS AND ALSO THE

BUS STOP ACCESS? >> BECAUSE A BUS WANTS TO GO RIGHT IN AND WRITE OUT. THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION ALLOWS THEM TO GET INTO THE DEVELOPMENT, THE SCHOOL BUS, TO GET INTO THE DEVELOPMENT, PICK UP THE KIDS QUICKLY AND GET OUT QUICKLY.

THEY DON'T HAVE TO DRIVE THROUGH ALL OF OUR ROADS TO GET OUT. IT PROVIDES EFFICIENCY FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. IT'S THE BEST LOCATION ON OUR SITE FOR A BUS IN TERMS OF EFFICIENCY.

>> YOU CAN HAVE IT ANYWHERE. YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE IT AT THIS LOCATION. YOU CAN ADJUST IT TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION. COULD YOU NOT? YOU HAVE TO ADJUST YOUR PLANS. MY POINT IS THAT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE AT THIS PARTICULAR POINT.

>> WILL HAS TO BE CLOSE TO THE COMMERCIAL. THE COMMERCIAL HAS TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE IT IN A REASONABLE WAY TO GET THERE TRAFFIC BACK OUT. THEY ALSO WANT TO INTERMINGLE TRAFFIC TOO MUCH WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY. BECAUSE IT ALIGNS WITH CLEMENTINE, THAT ENTRANCE ALIGNS WITH CLEMENTINE , IT REALLY DID DICTATE WHERE WE PUT OUR ENTRANCE BECAUSE BOTH THE CITY AND THE COUNTY WOULD LIKE US TO ALIGN WITH ANOTHER

[00:35:02]

WE ARE PRETTY HAPPY WITH IT. >> I HAVE A QUESTION ON THE HISTORY OF THE SITE 17 YEARS AGO. OBVIOUSLY A LONG TIME AGO.

WHOLE DIFFERENT GROUP. >> I REMEMBER THAT ONE. I

REMEMBER THAT SITE PLAN REMOVAL. >> EXCUSE ME, I WAS ON THE BOARD IN DECEMBER LAST YEAR. IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. I WAS JUST WONDERING IF THERE'S ANY INSIGHT INTO THE DEVIATION FROM

COMMERCIAL TO RESIDENTIAL. >> IT WAS A COMMERCIAL LAND USE FOR A LONG, LONG TIME. STRAWBERRY FIELDS IS WHAT IT WAS

CALLED. >> NEWBERRY FIELDS.

>> NEWBERRY. NEWBERRY FIELDS. >> IT USED TO BE STRAWBERRY

FIELDS. >> WHEN THEY'RE ACTUALLY STRAWBERRIES. YEAH. I REMEMBER COMMISSIONER COOK SAYING SHE WAS GETTING OUR CREDIT CARD TO SHOP AT TARGET. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU REMEMBER THAT ONE. DOWN MEMORY LANE. SO I THINK IT'S JUST THE MARKET ECONOMY. THERE'S A LOT , AS YOU MAY HAVE NOTICED, FROM THE REALLY EXCELLENT PRESENTATION . THE FUTURE LAND USE AND THE ZONING IN THIS AREA IS ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY , AND WHEN I SAY AREA, I MEAN OUT TO KINGS HIGHWAY QUITE A WAYS. IT'S ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY COMMERCIAL. SO THERE'S A LOT OF COMMERCIAL AVAILABLE . THE MARKET DIDN'T JUST ASK FOR COMMERCIAL AND ALL

OF THOSE YEARS. >> CAN YOU SHOW ME SOME UNDER PRESENTATION FROM THE OVERALL VIEW? LOOKING AT THE BUFFER THAT YOU HAVE THAT'S GOING TO BE ON THE WESTSIDE.

>> ALONG I-95. >> ALONG THE ENTRY UP THERE. I SEE ALL OF THE SIGNIFICANT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. IS THERE A BERM, A WALL PLANNED FOR THAT AS WELL?

>> YES, THERE IS A WALL. THANKS FOR ASKING. THERE IS A WALL PLANNED IN ADDITION TO A LOT OF LANDSCAPING ON OUR SIDE, AND SOME LANDSCAPING ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WALL. WHAT OUR CLIENT HAS OFFERED THE CITY IS THAT, IN ADDITION TO THIS SCULPTURAL FEATURE, THERE WOULD BE AN ENTRANCE FEATURE INTO THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE. THEY ARE ALSO HAPPY TO ALLOW THE CITY TO ALLOW THE OUTSIDE OF THE WALL FOR PUBLIC ART. SHOULD THEY DECIDE TO DO THAT AND BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE WHATEVER THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WOULD WANT? I KNOW THAT F.HAS CONCERNS ABOUT DISTRACTIBILITY IN THOSE TYPES OF THINGS. WE HAVE OFFERED THAT UP TO THE CITY'S ART BOARD. IS THAT WHAT

IS CALLED? >> INTERESTING. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? WE WILL HAVE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT, TO SPEAK TO

THE JENKINS ROAD ACTIVITIES. >> I ALMOST TOOK THE SIGN IN

SHEET. THANK YOU. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. LUKE LAMBERT.

CHAIR, DO YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS REGARDING JENKINS ROAD

YOU WOULD LIKE ANSWERED? >> IF YOU COULD , MAYBE LET US KNOW WHERE YOU ARE AT WITH THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IS ASIAN ISSUE.

>> SURE. THE PROPERTIES LOOKING TO HAVE TWO ACCESS POINTS ON JENKINS ROAD. SO THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY WE KIND OF DISCUSSED WITH THE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL PARCELS . WE WILL CALL THAT DRIVEWAY TWO. DRIVEWAY ONE IS OBVIOUSLY ACROSS FROM THE ICA CLASSICAL ACADEMY. WE HAVE, ESSENTIALLY, THE CLASSICAL ACADEMY, WITH THEIR APPLICATION, THEY HAVE DONE A SINGLE WARRANT ON THEIR BEHALF AND SENT IT INTO THE COUNTY. THE COUNTY -- ISSUED A TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR A SINGLE HOUR DUE TO THEIR OWN IMPACTS. THINK ABOUT THAT. YOU HAVE ALL THE PARENTS DRIVING IN FOR MORNING DROP OFF. WHAT WE DID, ON BEHALF OF PENALTY, IS ALSO DID AN ANALYSIS THAT LOOKED AT BOTH USES. SO THE SCHOOL, THE CHURCH AND THEN THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT. SO WITH OUR PROPOSED USE OF AROUND 250 UNITS, THE ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT THE SIGNAL IS WARRANTED BASED ON THE SCHOOL IMPACT . SO WHEN YOU

[00:40:05]

THERE IS A SLIDE THAT TALKED ABOUT THOSE P.M. ENTERING TRIPS . SO WHEN YOU COMPARED THOSE TRIPS OF THE A.M. EXITING FROM FAULTY, THEY ARE LESS THAN THE SCHOOLS TRIPS , BOTH IN AND OUT.

SO THE ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT THE SIGNALS WARRANTED MEETS MORE THAN ONE HOUR WITH BOTH USES COMBINED. BUT THE SCHOOL IS A SIGNIFICANT DRIVER OF THE SIGNAL. THEREFORE, WE WOULD CONTINUE -- CONTRIBUTE TO THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL BECAUSE IT WOULD

BE FOR BOTH PARTIES POINT >> SO THE END RESULT, WHAT I'M HEARING, AS THE CYCLIZATION IS GOING TO GO UP REGARDLESS.

WHETHER OR NOT IT'S GOING TO BE ACT -- FOR JUST AN HOUR AT SPECIFIC TIMES A DAY OR ACTIVE ALL THE TIME. IS THAT MADE?

>> THAT DECISION HAS NOT BEEN MADE YET. THEY ARE REVIEWING THE SIGNAL WARRANT. AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, THEY PREVIOUSLY ONLY MET THE WARRANT FOR SINGLE HOUR. THEY WERE GOING TO CONTINUE TO HAVE A SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD OUT THERE AND AN ACTIVE POLICE DETAIL DIRECTING TRAFFIC. THE SIGNAL WOULD RELIEVE THAT REQUIREMENT. WE ARE STILL TALKING THROUGH THAT . WHEN DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO SIGNALIZE THE INTERSECTION?

>> OKAY. >> ANY OTHER SIGNALS RELATED TO TRAFFIC IMPACT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> MR. LAMBERT, CAN YOU PLEASE SIGN IN? THANK YOU.

>> OTHER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR THE APPLICANT? I'M HEARING NONE. AT THIS TIME WE WILL OPEN IT UP TO PUBLIC COMMENT. IF THERE'S ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC.

>> COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. >> THAT'S RIGHT. SO YOU HAD INDICATED THE PROPERTY OWNER TO THE NORTH WAS PRESENT ? WITH THAT PROPERTY OWNER CARE TO COME UP ? DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO THIS? IF SO, PLEASE COME UP TO THE PODIUM. JUST A NAME AND

SIGN IN. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS KEN. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. THE THING I WOULD LIKE TO SAY IS I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE STAFF IN THE CITY.

STAFF AT THE COUNTY, SO FAR. WE HAVE ALL WORKED TOGETHER TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN IN A COOPERATIVE SPIRIT . AND IT DOES MAKE SENSE.

A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY. BASED ON THE 50 ACRES OF LAND AND I SOLD IT TO -- AS ANOTHER CONTRACT. THE ORIGINAL INTENT WAS TO MAKE IT A MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT. WHICH IS WHY THE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT EXISTS. BECAUSE IT WAS SUPPOSED TO WORK TOGETHER. NOW THAT THE COUNTY HAS ASKED OF US, THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNER, TO RESTRICT OUR CURRENT ACCESS TO A IN AND OUT ONLY, EVERYBODY WORKED TOGETHER TO ACTIVATE THE CROSS ACCESS.

ENTERING BACK TO JENKINS, THE NEED TO REQUIRE FULL ACCESS WAS CRITICAL FOR CUSTOMERS TO REACH THE COMMERCIAL PARCEL. TO BE ABLE TO GO NORTH OR SOUTH. IT IS CRITICAL. WE HOPE THE COUNTY SUPPORTS THAT . WE WANT TO CONTINUE. WE HAVE OWNED THIS FOR A LONG TIME, MORE THAN 20 YEARS. ALTHOUGH THE I-95 NEAR OKEECHOBEE IS BEATABLE. WITH ALL OF THE NATIONAL USERS. YOU'VE SEEN STARBUCKS, CHICK-FIL-A. WE WANT TO CONTINUE WITH THAT THEME . AND THE SUPPORT FOR THE FULL ACCESS IS CRITICAL TO CONTINUE TO ATTRACT THOSE HIGH-QUALITY CREDIT USERS. WITHOUT IT, WE WILL HAVE A CHALLENGE ON OUR HANDS TO GET THE KIND OF USERS YOU WANT TO SEE AS A CITY. I WANT TO SEE IS A DEVELOPER. SO WE ARE LOOKING FOR MAJOR SUPPORT TO MAKE SURE THAT FULL ACCESS, WITHOUT RESTRICTIONS, GET SUPPORTED. ANY QUESTIONS?

>> INTERNALLY, BETWEEN YOUR TWO GROUPS, ARE THERE ANY OBSTACLES TO WORKING OUT THE WAY THIS ACCESS IS GOING TO WORK BETWEEN

YOU? >> I DON'T SEE ANY. THE CITY HAS WORKED HARD TO GET US ALL LINED, IF YOU WILL. AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, MY EXISTING CUT IS CLOSE TO OKEECHOBEE. SO WE ARE

[00:45:02]

IT'S A PROBLEM I THINK FOR EVERYBODY. WE WANT TO DO THE BEST JOB WE CAN DO. ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME? ANY OTHER

QUESTIONS? >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

>> OKAY. >> HAVING HEARD FROM THE APPLICANT , I DIDN'T QUITE GET THAT. IS THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS APPLICATION? IF SO, PLEASE COME FORWARD. I'M SEEING NONE. I WILL SEND IT BACK TO THE BOARD

FOR ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. >> I JUST MAKE A CLOSING STATEMENT FROM STAFF? WHAT WE ARE ACTUALLY LOOKING FOR TODAY , OUTSIDE OF THE COMMENTS THAT WE ARE LIKELY TO HEAR FROM THE COUNTY , EITHER A DETERMINATION OF SUPPORT FOR A FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAY FOR THE COMMERCIAL HAS BEEN REQUESTED NOW . THAT WE CAN PROVIDE TO THE COUNTY FROM THE PLANNING BOARD IS THEIR OPINION FROM HOW THIS DEVELOPMENT SHOULD PROCEED. ULTIMATELY, IT IS THE COUNTY'S DECISION WHETHER OR NOT THAT IS GRANTED. AND WE HAVE TO STAND BY THE DECISION. BUT I THINK YOU CAN SEE, FROM BOTH PARTIES HERE, THAT AN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REACHED BETWEEN THEM.

IT SETTLES OUT ISSUES , BOTH WITH THE PARTIES INVOLVED AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. WE WENT THROUGH A LOT OF DISCUSSION WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT TO ENSURE THAT THE BUS STOP WAS IN THE CORRECT LOCATION. WE WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL BASED ON THE CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO THIS THAT MAY BE INCLUDED IN THAT WHETHER OR NOT THE PLANNING BOARD WOULD SUPPORT FULL ACCESS AT THE MOST NORTHERN POINT BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL.

>> I WOULD BELIEVE THAT IT IS MY POSITION , AND THE POSITION OF THE REST OF THE BOARD AS WELL, THAT IS NOT ONLY RECOMMENDED BUT NECESSARY FOR THE THINGS THAT WE DEEM IMPORTANT IN THE BUS ACCESS. THE CHALLENGE IS, HOW IT GETS BUILT , I THINK THE PHASING MIGHT POSE A CHALLENGE FOR THIS. IF THE BUS ACCESS IS DEPENDENT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH , AND HOW THAT ACCESS WORKS , THEN THIS CAN BE A CHALLENGE DEPENDING ON THE CONSTRUCTION TIMELINES OF ANY DEVELOPMENT ON THE OTHER PROPERTY AS WELL. I'M NOT REALLY SURE HOW TO WRAP THAT UP INTO A CONDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION. I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR YOUR INPUT ON IT. WE TALKED VERY FREQUENTLY ABOUT HOW IMPORTANT IT IS THAT WE HAVE THESE CONVENIENT BUS LOOPS IN THESE DEVELOPMENT. BUT NOW WE ARE LOOKING AT A CONVENIENT BUS LOOP THAT IS DEPENDENT ON DEVELOPMENT ON ANOTHER PROPERTY. PHASING ASIDE , FOR THIS MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT , WE NEED TO FIGURE

THAT OUT. >> I AGREE. THAT IS THE CHALLENGE FOR APPROVAL ON THIS AMENDMENT FOR THE BUS ACCESS .

IF IT'S IN PHASE TWO. TO MISS CLEMONS POINT, HOW DO WE APPROVE THIS ? HOW DO WE MOVE FOR? WITH RECOMMENDATION. COULD THIS BUS

[00:50:04]

>> TO MR. FREEMAN'S POINT, I THINK THAT THE SUPPORT OF THIS BOARD FOR THE FULL AXIS, IT'S IMPORTANT FOR US TO STATE THAT TODAY. I THINK WE ALSO NEED TO UNDERSTAND HOW THAT'S GOING TO , HOW ALL THIS IS GOING TO PHASE OUT AND WORK AS A CONSTRUCTION PLAN DEVELOPED. MR. FREEMAN, WE HAVE A LIST OF CONDITIONS ,

RIGHT? A LIST OF 14 CONDITIONS. >> YEAH.

>> ADDRESS THAT ISSUE. >> RIGHT, RIGHT. I WAS BRINGING IT UP. MISS OLSEN HAD CONVEYED THEY ARE AMENABLE TO REDRAWING THE PHASING SCOPE TO INCORPORATE ELEMENTS OF THE ROADWAYS, AT LEAST FOR THE BUS LOOP , SO THAT IT WOULD BE INCORPORATED IN PHASE ONE. COMING UP TO THE PODIUM. I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR, POSSIBLY, AN IDEA OR SOLUTION OF HOW WE WOULD BE ABLE TO

IMPLEMENT THIS CUSTOM. >> THANKS FOR ALLOWING ME TO COME UP AND SPEAK. WOULD YOU MIND PULLING UP THE SITE PLANS SO THAT WE CAN .2? SINCE WE DON'T HAVE AN ILLUSTRATION IT'S A LITTLE BIT HARD FOR TO SHOW. CAN I JUST USE THE MOUSE? OKAY. YES. IDEALLY, AT THE END RUN, I REALLY , THE BUSES WOULD PULL IN HERE , THROUGH HERE, PICK UP THE KIDS, RIGHT THERE, AND OUT HERE. IF, FOR SOME REASON, THE COMMERCIAL TO MOVE FORWARD AT THIS TIME WE CAN ADJUST OUR PHASING LINE TO SHOW HOW A BUS CAN COME IN HERE , AROUND, PICK UP AND GO BACK OUT.

WHETHER THE COMMERCIAL WORKS OR DOESN'T , WHETHER IT IS CONCURRENT , OR WHETHER IT IS LATER, WE CAN MAKE THAT BUS LOOP WORK IN THAT LOCATION WITH ADJUSTING THE PHASING LINES AND WE ARE HAPPY TO HAVE YOU CONDITION IT ON THAT.

>> SO THE PHASE PLAN CAN BE REVISED TO INCLUDE, ESSENTIALLY,

THE ENTIRE ENTRY POINT? >> WE WILL WORK THIS OUT BEFORE THE COMMISSION BASED ON YOUR CONDITION OF APPROVAL.

>> HAS THE SCHOOL BOARD HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON THIS OPTIONAL PLAN? DID YOU PRESENT THAT TO THEM AT ALL?

>> THIS IS THE GENERAL LOCATION THAT THEY ASK FOR IT. WE WILL BE HAPPY TO SHOW THEM THAT PLAN B WILL BE WHY .

>> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO MAKE SURE THEY SEE THIS OPTION.

>> INDICATE WITH THEM ABOUT THAT.

>> GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY. >> IS THE AREA THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT , PHASE TWO, THIS AREA .

>> YES, IT IS. >> IF ALL THESE OTHER PROPERTIES ARE BEING DEVELOPED AND THE HOMES BEING OCCUPIED, AND WE'VE GOT KIDS, WHAT'S THE GAME PLAN BEFORE YOU GET TO PHASE TWO?

>> WE ARE GOING TO ADJUST THE PHASING LINE. BEFORE WE GO TO

COMMISSION. >>'S YOU ARE SAYING THE BUS ROUTE WOULD BE INCLUDED IN PHASE ONE?

>> YES, MA'AM. YES, MA'AM. >> IS THERE ANY CONCERN WITH STUDENTS WALKING THROUGH CONSTRUCTION NEAR THAT SECONDARY

PHASE? >> IF THE BOULEVARD WAS INCLUDED IN PHASE ONE ALL OF THE ROADS AND SIDEWALKS WOULD BE COMPLETE

ON THEIR WAY TO THAT BUS STOP. >> A 15TH CONDITION THAT THE PHASING LINES BE MODIFIED TO INCORPORATE THE NORTH ENTRANCE AND BUS LOOP. AND OBVIOUSLY ROADWAY ACCESS FOR PHASE ONE.

>> SIDEWALKS, COMPLETE FOR THE STUDENTS.

>> I SEE SHE IS TAKING NOTES. THANK YOU, MISS OLSEN.

[00:55:06]

>> ANY OTHER FOR THE DISCUSSION? >> I WANT TO SAY, THANK YOU GUYS FOR COMING TOGETHER TO RESOLVE MY ISSUE. I WAS DEFINITELY AT A

THUMBS DOWN. >> ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT RIGHT

NOW WE ADD THE 15TH? >> SO WE WOULD ADD A 15TH CONDITION BEFORE THE COME BACK HERE IN SEPTEMBER, THE FINAL PD , A REVISION TO THE PHASING PLAN SO THAT THIS NORTH ACCESS , ASSOCIATED BUS LOOP AND ROADWAY CONNECTION TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD

BE INCLUDED IN PHASE ONE. >> I THINK THE OTHER THING I WILL SHARE, OR REMIND ALL OF US , IS THAT WE ARE VOTING ON THE

MASTER PLAN. NOT THE FINAL PLAN. >> ANOTHER QUESTION OR CONCERN ABOUT ALL THE PROPERTIES IS TRAFFIC ON A TWO LANE ROAD. IS THERE ANY THOUGHT OF WIDENING THE ROADS IN THE FUTURE TO ACCOMMODATE ALL OF THE DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENTS?

>> REQUESTED. SO JENKINS ROAD IS CURRENTLY IN THE VERY EARLY PHASES OF THE STUDY, WHICH IS ONE OF THE VERY FIRST ELEMENTS TO LOOK AT THE IMPACTS OF WIDENING THE ROADWAY. SO JENKINS ROAD IS PLANNED TO BE A FOUR-WAY ROADWAY. IS A VERY ASPIRATIONAL -- TO CONNECT IT DOWN TO MIDWAY ROAD. THERE'S A FEW CHALLENGES AND HURDLES TO GO THROUGH. SO THEY ARE JUST STARTING OF THE PROJECT. DOT HELD OPEN HOUSES FOR KICKOFF EARLIER THIS YEAR.

THE ANSWER IS, YES, JENKINS ROAD WILL ULTIMATELY BE A FOUR-WAY ROADWAY. IS NO CONSTRUCTION FUNDING WITHIN THE FIVE-YEAR WORK PROGRAM . SO THE TIMING OF THAT IS KIND OF THE QUESTION.

>> OKAY. AND YOUR PLAN FITS WITHIN THAT PLAN. IF IT DOES MOVE FORWARD AS FAR AS WIDENING THE ROADWAY NEVER THAT TIMING IS. ARE GOING TO BE SIDEWALKS ON THE OUTSIDE OF YOUR DIVISION? WILL I BE ABLE TO HAPPEN AS WELL? WE TALKED ABOUT SIDEWALKS AND CONNECTING DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES IN THE PAST. WILL THIS PROPERTY ACCOMMODATE SIDEWALKS EVEN WITH THE WIDENING

OF THE ROAD? >> SO JENKINS WROTE IS A COUNTY FACILITY. THEY HAVE THEIR OWN CODES WITH REGARDS TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIDEWALKS , PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF AND THINGS LIKE THAT. ONCE THE PROJECT UNDERGOES THE STUDY THEY WILL GO TO DESIGN PHASE. ULTIMATELY, MANY CORE DOORS THAT HAVE FACILITIES AND SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES, THERE IS AN OPTION FOR MULTIMODAL PATHWAYS. THERE'S A LOT OF CONSIDERATIONS THAT GO INTO THE STUDY. THAT WILL BE WORKED OUT. WE LOOKED AT THE USES ALONG JENKINS ROAD. SO YOU HAVE THE SCHOOL SITE, YOU HAVE THE CAMPGROUND TO THE SOUTH. THERE'S A LOT OF REASONS AS TO WHY YOU WOULD ADD THOSE MULTIMODAL FACILITIES.

>> THANK YOU. >> CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR

THE RECORD? >> LUKE LAMBERT.

>> THANK YOU. >> LET ME ASK ONE MORE QUESTION ON THE SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT . TO ALL THE STREETS

HAVE SIDEWALKS ? >> THE STREETS HAVE SIDEWALKS ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD ON SOME STREETS. ON THE BOULEVARD'S , THEY HAVE SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREETS.

>> ANYTHING ELSE? >> THE ONLY THING , AND THIS IS FOR ZONING CHANGE AS WELL , TO COMMERCIAL. WE HAVE FUTURE LAND USE. THIS IS FOR THE ZONING CHANGE.

>> YES. >> I LOOK AT ALL THE NEW DEVELOPMENTS . EVELYN CROSSING, SALVATION POINT THE NORTH, CREEKSIDE , SEVERAL OTHERS THAT ARE COMING UP. I JUST WORRY ABOUT WHAT'S LEFT FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

ESPECIALLY IN THAT MAIN AREA, WHERE THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF GOOD COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT HAS COME UP. ALL OF THESE NEIGHBORHOODS NEED SHOPPING, THEN HE JOBS , THEY NEED ACTIVITIES. THAT'S JUST ONE THING THAT ANOTHER FUTURE LAND USE IS THERE. ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO STATE AS A CONCERN. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE SHARES THAT AS WELL.

>> IT'S INTERESTING WHEN I LOOK AT THIS. PROPERTIES, ABUTTING A MAJOR ROADWAY LIKE I-95, YOU WOULD THINK WOULD MAKE A LOT

[01:00:02]

SO I THINK THE INITIAL LAYOUT , PROBABLY THE INITIAL VISION , WAS TO PUT COMMERCIAL THERE. IT'S RIGHT NEXT THE INTERSTATE.

BUT IT HAS GONE UNDEVELOPED FOR SO LONG. YOU HAVE TO RESPECT THE MARKET TO AN EXTENT OF WHAT IT'S GOING TO NEED AND WHAT IT DOESN'T NEED. I PERSONALLY LIKE THE APPROACH THEY'VE TAKEN WITH ALL OF THE LANDSCAPE OFFERING, THE BERM, THE RETAINING WALL.

AND ALSO, THIS PROPERTY ISN'T RIGHT ON THE INTERSTATE PROPER.

IT'S ON THE ON RAMP. I THINK THE WAY THAT THEY HAVE DESIGNED IT IS VERY GOOD IN HOW IT APPROACHES DEALING WITH THAT MAJOR TRAFFIC JUST OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE. IF THERE'S

NO FOR THE DISCUSSION. >> I'M SORRY. JUST A QUESTION .

I DIDN'T SEE A DOG PARK OR PLAYGROUND. WAS THAT IN THERE, IN THE PLAN ? IN THE FUTURE PLAN ONCE EVERYTHING IS APPROVED, THE

FINAL PLAN. I'M ASKING . >> YES. THERE IS A RECREATIONAL PARK, HERE, WITH A TOT LOT NEXT TO THE POOL. AND YOU HAVE THE MEANDERING NATURE TRAIL. IT'S A THIRD OF A MILE LONG THAT GOES ALL THE WAY UP TO THE IDENTITY FEATURE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER AND THEN CONNECTS DOWN AND AROUND. WE HAVEN'T IDENTIFIED ANY DOG PARKS IN PARTICULAR. BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF POCKET PARKS AS YOU WALK ALONG THE NATURE TRAIL. AND IF THE HOAS DECIDES IN THE FUTURE, AFTER THIS IS BUILT OUT, THAT THEY WANT TO REINVENT THE TIES THIS IN SOME WAY AND IDENTIFY A LOCATION FOR THAT, THERE ARE LOTS OF OPTIONS. F1

>> IT'S HELPFUL TO HAVE THAT INCLUDED . AS A DOG OWNER,

MYSELF, AND THE PLANTS. >> YOU ARE LUCKY YOU HAVE A DOG THAT YOU CAN TAKE TO THE DOG PARK. IS SO BADLY BEHAVED I

CAN'T. THANKS. >> THAT WAS IT. THANK YOU.

>> DO WE THINK WE HAVE IT NOW? EVERYBODY GOOD? I'M SEEING NO FOR THE DISCUSSION FROM THE BOARD. AT THIS TIME I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND YOU, WE HAVE 15 STATED CONDITIONS FROM THE STAFF, WITH THE 15TH CONDITION .

>> THAT MOTION, CORNERSTONE MASTER-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ,

WITH A NOTED 15 CONDITIONS. >> RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

>> RECOMMEND APPROVAL. >> SECOND.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. 15 CONDITIONS. A MOTION BY MR. WIDING. SECOND BY MS. CLEMONS.

>> CAN YOU STATE THE 15TH CONDITION?

>> YES. THE 15TH CONDITION REGARDING ADJUSTING THE PHASE IN LINE BEFORE THE FINAL PD TO INCLUDE THE NORTH ACCESS AND BUS

LOOP OPTION. >> WITH SIDEWALKS FINISHED.

COMPLETED PICK >> SIDEWALKS FINISHED, COMPLETED WITH ROADWAY ACCESS TO THE DEVELOPED PART OF PHASE ONE.

>> THANK YOU. >> MR. COLLINS? MISS CLEMENS? MR. WIDING? MR. JOHNSON? MISS CARTER? CHAIR KREISL?

[c. PZCON2025-00007 Conditional Use Live Oak Detox Center 912 Avenue I]

>> THANK YOU. MOVING ON, WE HAVE ITEM 6C. CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION , LIVE OAK DETOX CENTER.

>> GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS. BEFORE YOU WE HAVE LIVE OAK DETOX CENTER, CONDITIONAL USE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 912 AVENUE I. PARCEL I.D. PZCON2025-00007 -- THE PROPERTY OWNER IS HALEY NEELY. APPROXIMATELY 0.56 ACRES, PLUS OR MINUS. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO INCREASE THE OCCUPANCY OF AN EXISTING DETOX FACILITY FROM 14 TO 16 CLIENTS, LOCATED IN THE ARE FOR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE. THE

[01:05:01]

SURROUNDED BY RN. AND A ZONING OF OUR FOR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. PRETTY MUCH SURROUNDED BY ARE FOR AND OR THREE. WHICH IS MODERATE DENSITY. OKAY. THIS IS A SITE PLAN FOR THE EXISTING DETOX FACILITY . THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE A MAX OF 16 RESIDENTS. CONSISTING OF 18 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER. MALE AND FEMALE. SIX FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES . INCLUDES A PHYSICIAN AND/OR NURSE PRACTITIONER . SEVERAL ROTATING SHIFTS. ALL TRANSPORTATIONS PROVIDED BY STAFF ONLY. NO PERSONAL VEHICLES. 24/7 MEDICAL MONITORING. RELAPSE PREVENTION PLANNING , TWELVE-STEP FACILITATION , HOLISTIC SERVICES, VOCATIONAL LIFE SKILLS, CASE MANAGEMENT AND MEALS. THIS IS THE EXISTING FLOOR PLAN. AND THE SUBJECT SITE. STAFF RECOMMENDS WITH THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE TO CITY COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMEND MODIFIED APPROVAL OR RECOMMEND DISAPPROVAL. THANK

YOU. THANK YOU, MR. GILMORE. >> GOING BACK TO THE PREVIOUS CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION, I BELIEVE FROM 2016 . YOU STATED THAT ALL OF THESE CONDITIONS WERE MET DURING THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION PROCESS. I'M CURIOUS ABOUT CONDITION ONE .

PROVIDE REQUIRED PARKING ON THE SITE OR PURSUE PAYMENT IN LIEU OF PROGRAM. WHEN WE LOOK AT THE APPLICATION FROM 2016 WHAT WOULD BE THE IMPACT PARKING REQUIREMENTS?

>> IT WOULD REQUIRE MORE PARKING BECAUSE OF THE BEDS THAT THEY HAVE. THEY ARE PROVIDING ALL THE TRANSPORTATION AND THEY DID PAY A PAYMENT IN LIEU OF FOR THE LAST CONDITIONAL USE.

>> THEY DID A PAYMENT FOR 2016? OKAY. THEY DIDN'T ADD ANY PARKING IN 2016. THEY JUST DID A PAYMENT IN LIEU. HAVING SPACES WOULD NEED TO BE ADDED? NEW OCCUPANCY.

>> TRANSPORTATION BY STAFF. >> WILL NOT BE COMING UP IN A

MINUTE? >> I THINK TRANSPORTATION IS PROVIDED BY STAFF. IF THAT IS THE CASE THAN THE CONDITIONAL USE FOR TRANSPORTATION WOULD BE PROVIDED BY STAFF. THE NUMBER OF STAFF -- PARKING REQUIREMENT WOULD NOT BE ANYMORE.

[01:10:14]

>> 1.5 PARKING SPACES PER BED. 1.5 PER BED. OKAY.

>> AND HOW MANY ARE CURRENTLY THERE?

>> 14. THEY ALREADY HAVE A ROOM. >> NINE PARKING SPACES.

>> EIGHT REGULAR PARKING SPACES AND ONE HANDICAP.

>> IT'S CURIOUS THAT THERE WERE EIGHT ROOMS. THERE'S ROOMS FOR 16 INITIALLY AND SEVEN ROOMS FOR 14. WAS APPROVED. WAS IT TIED TO ANYTHING ELSE? I'M CURIOUS WHY THAT WOULD BE THAT IT WAS

APPROVED INITIALLY. >> I WOULD HAVE TO DEFER TO THE

APPLICANT. >> WE WILL GET THERE WHEN THE APPLICANT COMES UP. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? IF YOU WOULD, SIR, PLEASE COME FORWARD TO THE PODIUM.

STATE YOUR NAME AND SIGN IN. >> I AM CODY NEELY WITH LIVE OAK

DETOX. >> IN 2016 YOU DID A PAYMENT IN LIEU INSTEAD OF ADDING NEW PARKING.

>> IT WAS NOT OUR COMPANY THAT ORIGINALLY DID THE APPLICATION FOR USE. I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT, AT THE TIME, THE COMPANY, AND THIS IS WHAT I WAS TOLD THROUGH OTHER PEOPLE THAT WORKED IN THE INDUSTRY AT THE TIME, WAS THAT THEY DIDN'T, THEY JUST DIDN'T ASK FOR THOSE ADDITIONAL RESIDENCES. THEY DIDN'T SEE ANY REASON TO ADD THOSE ADDITIONAL RESIDENCES AT THE TIME. EVEN THOUGH THE ORIGINAL, OBVIOUSLY THE BUILDING ITSELF, WAS BUILT . YOU CAN TELL WHEN YOU'RE IN THERE IT HAS EIGHT BEDROOMS. IT'S A HOUSE WITH 16 INDIVIDUALS. BUT THEY JUST DIDN'T APPLY FOR IT FOR WHATEVER REASON.

>> I WAS CHECKING THEM OUT. HE SAID 1.5 PARKING SPACES PER BED WOULD BE OUT OF THE BOOK REQUIREMENT. RIGHT?

>> YES. THERE IS A HALF PARKING SPOT. I KNOW THIS SOUNDS CRAZY, BUT THEY ACTUALLY PLANTED, THE EVEN CONCRETE AND PLANTED A TREE AT THE END OF IT PIXEL A SMALL CAR CAN PARK THERE. WE ARE JUST TRYING TO BE HONEST ABOUT THE PARKING SPACES. WE HAVE PEOPLE PARKED MOTORCYCLE THERE. I'VE SEEN A MINI PARK THERE. FOR WHATEVER REASON, IT'S LIKE A COUPLE OF FEET SHORTER THAN IT PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN. ALSO PARK THERE AND BE A LITTLE BIT STUCK OUT. IT IS THERE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE ATTENTION WITH THAT IS EITHER. MAYBE THEY DIDN'T WANT TO REMOVE THAT TREE

MANY YEARS AGO. I'M NOT SURE. >> COULD YOU DO A GOOGLE MAP

SEARCH FOR THE PROPERTY? >> YEAH. IT'S NOT A HUGE TREE

EITHER. >> I WAS LOOKING BACK THROUGH THE 2016 APPLICATION AND I SAW SOME OF THE OLD PHOTOS. I CAN SEE THAT AT THE TIME WHEN THE FENCE WAS BUILT. I CAN SEE THE LANDSCAPING THAT WAS INSTALLED AND EVERYTHING. I'M GOING TO BE STUCK ON THIS ISSUE. YOU ARE IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE WE DON'T HAVE STREETS WIDE ENOUGH FOR STREET PARKING. IT'S A CONTINUAL CONCERN. LOOKING AT YOUR PARKING LOT NOW , JUST IN HIS IMAGE, YOU HAVE TWO VEHICLES PARKED IN YOUR PARKING LOT.

YOU'VE GOT A VEHICLE PARKED ON THE GRASS ON THE ROADWAY RIGHT AWAY. THAT'S FT. PIERCE. BUT IT'S TECHNICALLY NOT.

>> I BELIEVE THIS PHOTO WAS TAKEN BEFORE WE OCCUPIED THE

SPACE. >> YOU CAN SEE THE PAR -- CAR PARKED IN FRONT OF THE TREE THAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. THE ONE

RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE. >> WE GO BY THE STAFFING GUIDELINES BASED ON FAMILIES. AND THE STAFFING GUIDELINES, WE ARE ABLE TO SUPPORT THE RESIDENCE FOR STAFFING WITHOUT HAVING TO ADD ADDITIONAL STAFF EITHER. SO WE DO HAVE ENOUGH

PARKING FOR OUR STAFF. >> WHAT IS YOUR MAXIMUM STAFF

NUMBER? >> IT'S SIX PEOPLE ON EACH SHIFT. BECAUSE IT'S OBVIOUSLY 12 HOUR SHIFTS. AND EVEN OVERNIGHT IS LESS THAN IT WOULD BE IF IT WAS THE MEDICAL STAFF,

[01:15:05]

WE WOULD HAVE 24 HOUR NURSING. IT WOULD ESSENTIALLY BE THERE.

THE THERAPIST. SHE IS NOT THERE OVERNIGHT. SO SHE WOULD GO HOME AT THAT POINT. NINE OF THE RESIDENCE, LIKE WE SAID, NONE OF THEM DRIVE IN OR KEEP THEIR CARS IN THE PROPERTY. IT'S ALSO A SAFETY THING. WE JUST DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH PEOPLE NOT HAVING A CAR, OR A WITHIN THEIR CAR. IT'S JUST EASIER TO BE

THEM OFF-SITE . >> ANY OF THE QUESTIONS FOR THE

APPLICANT? >> WE ALSO HAVE VISITATION. NONE OF THAT MATTERS. THE SHORT-TERM FACILITY. WE DO HAVE FAMILIES COMING THERE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT WOULD BE DIFFERENT IF IT WAS AN OUTPATIENT WITH A LONG-TERM, EXTENDED CARE FOR YOU HAVE FAMILIES COMING IN AND YOU HAVE FAMILY DAY OR SOMETHING.

BUT WE DON'T. IT'S NOT THE PURPOSE OF THIS FACILITY. IT'S

MORE STABILIZATION. >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY

MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. >> IF THERE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS APPLICATION , PLEASE COME FORWARD AT THIS TIME. I'M SEEIG NONE. I WILL SEND IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. DO ANY OF YOU SHARE MY CONCERNS ABOUT THE PARKING ISSUE?

>> I GUESS IT'S NOT YOUR CONCERN . PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION TO THE FACILITY. IF THERE STAFF , IF THERE IS A MAXIMUM OF SIX CARS THEN IT IS NATURALLY AN ISSUE. THE ONLY THING THAT WOULD BE A CONCERN IS IF THE STAFF HAS VISITORS -- VISITATION RIGHTS.

THERE IS A BUS THAT PARKS ON THE FACILITY.

>> IT LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE A VAN THAT THEY USE.

>> IT'S LIKE A MIDSIZE SUV AND I APOLOGIZE. THE STAFF CAN'T HAVE VISITATION BECAUSE IT IS A HIPAA COMPLIANCE ISSUE. CORRECT.

WE CAN HAVE ANYONE OUTSIDE COMING IN FOR PRIVACY PURPOSES.

BECAUSE WHILE THEY ARE THERE THEY ARE A PATIENT ESSENTIALLY.

YOU CAN DIVULGE THAT THEY ARE THERE. EVEN WHEN PEOPLE CALL. WE CANNOT CONFIRM OR DENY IF THERE SOMEONE IN THE FACILITY AT THIS

TIME. >> OKAY. THANK YOU.

>> ANYONE ELSE? JUST TO CLARIFY, THIS IS A CONDITIONAL USE . IS IT FOR OCCUPANCY? OR NUMBER OF OCCUPANCY.

>> NUMBER OF BEDS, EITHER WAY. THEY ARE INCREASING FROM 14 TO

16. INDIVIDUALS. >> ARE YOU RECOMMENDING ANY

CONDITIONS? >> I MIGHT REQUEST THE CONDITION THAT RESTRICTS PARKING TO STAFF ONLY .

>> I WAS THINKING THE SAME THING. I'M NOT SURE IF THAT WOULD DETER PEOPLE FROM PARKING ON THE STREET. THAT, WHICH I THINK IS THE ONLY THING I'M CONCERNED WITH. IF THEY PARKED TOO MANY VEHICLES IN THEIR OWN PARKING LOT IT IS THEIR PROPERTY, THAT'S THEIR PROBLEM. I JUST DON'T WANT IT TO BECOME A NUISANCE FOR NEIGHBORS. IT DOESN'T APPEAR LIKE THAT IS

REALLY WHAT IS GOING ON. >> IF YOU CAN GET BACK TO THE PICTURES ACTUALLY SHOWING THE PROPERTY, THE PHOTOS, IT APPEARED THAT THERE WAS, ON THE INSIDE OF THE HEDGE , ONE OF THE VEHICLES, ONE OF THE PICTURES, THEPICTURE ON THE UPPER LEFT , THAT VEHICLE, ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TRASH CANS, THAT LOOKS LIKE IT'S ON GRASS TO ME. THAT LOOKS LIKE ITS WAY RIGHT. MAYBE I'M WRONG. MY OTHER THOUGHT IS, AND I'M SEEING, ON THE LEFT SIDE , GO LEFT , YOU CAN GO LEFT NOW . THE TRUCK, THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT TRUCK, IT LOOKS LIKE THAT DARK VEHICLE IS ON GRASS ALSO. I DON'T KNOW IF A SOLUTION IS FRANKLY MORE USE OF THE GRASS THAN WE REALIZE I DON'T KNOW. SEE WHAT I MEAN? I THINK IT'S ON THE OTHER SIDE TOO. BY THE HEDGE . IF WE GO TO

[01:20:12]

THAT SATELLITE VIEW . >> I SEE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING MR. WIDING. LOOKING FOR THE APPLICATION IS SOME OF THE SITE PLAN MATERIAL . IT APPEARS TO ME THAT THE SETBACKS WOULD ALLOW FOR SOME ADDITIONAL PARKING. I THINK IT'S JUST A MATTER OF WHETHER OR NOT WE FEEL IT'S NECESSARY TO COMPEL THEM TO DO THAT. I THINK THE PREVIOUS CONDITIONAL USE , THE PROPERTY OWNER AT THE TIME COMPLIED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS . THEY PUT IN FENCING, THEY PUT IN LANDSCAPING, THEY CLEANED UP THE PARKING LOT . IT DID NOT LOOK LIKE THAT BEFORE 2016. I SAW THE OLD IMAGES . THEY CLEANED UP THE PARKING LOT AND THEY RESTRAINT.

HOW DO YOU ALL FEEL ABOUT KEVIN'S CONDITION? DO YOU FEEL

THAT IS NECESSARY? >> VENDORS, SUPPLIES, DELIVERIES AND ALL OF THAT. ANYTHING THAT IS CONSTRAINING THEM FROM

OPERATING. >> GOOD POINT.

>> YOU COULD AMEND IT TO PARKING RESTRICTED AND STAFF USE ONLY.

PATIENTS SHALL NOT HAVE PARKING SPACES.

>> THIS PARTICULAR FACILITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE PATIENTS TO HAVE

CARS. >> I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO SAY IS THAT PARKING IS RESTRICTED TO STAFF AND SERVICE

VEHICLES. >> THAT IS OBVIOUSLY BIG AND THEIR BUSINESS PLAN AND THE REGULATIONS HAVE TO CONFORM WITH. IT DOESN'T REALLY SEEM TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE. THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO STIPULATE THAT IN A CONDITION HERE. JUST SO THAT IT STATED. WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR. ANYONE ELSE?

>> THESE FACILITIES ARE DOING A GREAT SERVICE IN THE COMMUNITY.

I WOULD HATE TO LIMIT IT . FRANKLY , 365 HELPING A COUPLE MORE FOLKS. I'M RELUCTANT NOT TO LET THEM EXPAND.

>> WITH THIS EXCEPTION FOR THE PARKING BE ONLY FOR THIS FACILITY? HOW WOULD THAT BE STATED? JUST IN CASE .

>> A CONDITIONAL USE WOULD BE ATTACHED THIS PROPERTY MOVING

FORWARD. >> A CONDITION ON THAT, THE CONDITIONAL USE APPLIES TO THIS APPLICANT ONLY.

>> SMART MOVE. >> FOR THE RECORD, WE ARE PROPOSING A CONDITION THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE . WAIVING THE REQUIREMENT FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING BE ATTACHED TO THIS SPECIFIC PROPERTY OWNER OR OPERATOR .

>> SELLS THE PROPERTY WITH THE BUSINESS ON IT.

>> BUSINESS. >> WOULD NOT EXTEND IF THE PROPERTY WAS SOLD. OR IF THE BUSINESS WAS SOLD.

>> IF THE OPERATION AND BUSINESS REMAINED, THIS IS NOT THE CONDITION. THE OPERATION BUSINESS WAS MAINTAINED AS PROPOSED TODAY THEN THAT WOULD NOT CHANGE THE APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE AS WE ARE LOOKING AT IMPROVING NOW . WHAT WE ARE SAYING HERE NOW IS IF THE USE CHANGED THAT THIS WOULD NOT AUTOMATICALLY BE TRANSFERRED TO THE NEXT USE UNLESS IT MET THE

[01:25:05]

GET TO PICK >> SO IT'S TIED TO THESE?

>> TIED TO THE USE. >> NOT NECESSARILY THIS PROPERTY. OR THE PROPERTY OWNER.

>> IF THE USE CONTINUES THE WAY --

>> EXACTLY. >> AND THE USE IS ALSO INCLUDING

THE TRANSPORTATION. >> EVERYTHING. YES. EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN PROPOSED HERE WITH THIS APPLICATION WOULD BE APPROVED . ANY CHANGES TO THAT, IN TERMS OF OPERATION OR STAFF LEVELS OR WHATEVER , WOULD OBVIOUSLY NECESSITATE A REVISIT.

>> CONDITIONAL USE IS ESSENTIALLY TIED TO MAINTAIN THE STATUS OF THE USE FACILITY AS IT'S BEEN STATED TODAY.

>> OKAY. >> I THINK WE'VE GOT IT.

ANYBODY WANT TO TRY TO TAKE A STAB AT A MOTION FOR THAT ONE?

>> A MOTION FOR APPROVAL WITH PARKING STRUCTURES FOR CONDITIONAL USE TIED TO THE USE WITHIN THE PROPERTY. AS STATED

TODAY. >> SECOND.

>> I THINK WE UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE. I THINK THE COMMISSION WILL AS WELL. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL WITH ONE CONDITION BY MR. JOHNSON, SECOND BY MS.

CLEMONS. >> MISSED CLEMONS? MR. WIDING? JOHNSON? CARTER? MR. COLLINS? CHAIR KREISL?

[d. PZSITE2025-00009 Major Site Plan and Innovative Community Development Sunrise Village Apartments 3000 Okeechobee Road]

>> THANK YOU, EVERYONE. I'M MOVING ON TO ITEM 6D. INNOVATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. SUNRISE VILLAGE APARTMENT.

>> GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND BOARD MEMBERS. TODAY I BRING BEFORE YOU SUNRISE VILLAGE APARTMENTS, A MAJOR SITE PLAN WITH INNOVATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AT 3000 OKEECHOBEE ROAD. THE APPLICANT WAS ARIANNA HILLARD OF WG I INCORPORATED.

PROPERTY OWNERS ARROW INVESTMENT GROUP LLC. PARCEL I.D.

241750400200016. IN SUMMARY, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF A MAJOR SITE PLAN INNOVATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO DEVELOP 106 APARTMENT UNITS AT 3000 OKEECHOBEE ROAD. THE THREE MULTILEVEL MULTIFAMILY BUILDING PROPOSES TO OFFER COMMUNITY AMENITIES, RESOURCES AND UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS , ENHANCED LANDSCAPING AND TRANSIT ORIENTED DESIGN FEATURES. HERE IS AN AREA OF VIEW OF THE SITE LOCATION.

THE SITE AREA, APPROXIMATELY 6.87 ACRES. THE FUTURE LAND USE OF THE PROPERTY IS RM, MEDIUM DENSITY, SURROUNDED BY GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO THE WEST, EAST AND SOUTH. RESIDENTIAL LOAD TO THE NORTH. THE ZONING IS ARE FOR, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH GENERAL COMMERCIAL C3 TO THE WEST, EAST, SOUTH AND SINGLE FAMILY INTERMEDIATE TO THE NORTH. ACCORDING TO ARTICLE FIVE, SECTION 125-243, INNOVATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IS ACHIEVED THROUGH ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY BY EMPLOYING METHODS TO ACHIEVE DISTINCTIVENESS AND EXCELLENT IN SITING, DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING. POTENTIAL USES FOR INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE THE DUPLEX, QUADRO PLEX, TRIPLEX AND IN THIS CASE WOULD BE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING. POLICY, 1.1.7. THE CITY WOULD ALLOW DENSITY BONUS OF FIVE DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE ABOVE THE MINIMUM. I'M SORRY, MAXIMUM PERMITTED DENSITY FOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED WITHIN A QUARTER-MILE OF THE RAIL STATION

[01:30:04]

THERE WOULD BE ONE ENTRANCE AS WELL AS FOR THE PROPOSED PROPERTY SIGN TO BE LOCATED. SOME OF THE DETAILS OF THE SITE PLAN, AGAIN, PROPOSED UNITS WILL BE 106. FLOORPLAN THREE, STORY BUILDINGS. ONE IN THREE BEDROOM UNITS. THE COMMUNITY PROPOSES TO OFFER A LITTLE OVER AN ACRE WITH A FOUNTAIN. TWO PET WAY STATIONS. A 20 BY 20 GAZEBO, INDOOR AND OUTDOOR FITNESS AREA, TOT LOT AND RECREATION AREA. AN ACTIVITY ROOM, A GREAT ROOM, COVERED BUS SHELTER , 38 SPACE COVERED BY KIOSKS AND ONE BIKE RACK. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED A QUARTER-MILE THROUGH AND SITS ON THE CORNER OF OKEECHOBEE AND SOUTH 33RD STREET . AS WELL AS THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THAT THE UNITS BE AFFORDABLE.

ELEVATIONS WITH RENDERINGS , I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO HIGHLIGHT THAT THE DESIGN STYLE OF THE MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS IS ANGLO CARIBBEAN WITH USE OF COLORS WHITE, GRAY, AND WHITE BLUE. WE SEE SOME WALL FIXTURES, AS WELL AS SOME OF THE SHADOWS ON THE BUILDING WOULD BE A BRONZE MEDAL COLOR. BUILDING A WILL HAVE 46 UNITS. OF COURSE, THAT'S FOR THE CLUBHOUSE AND OTHER AMENITIES THAT ARE OFFERED TO THE COMMUNITY WILL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING A . BOTH BUILDINGS B AND C WILL HAVE 30 UNITS EACH.

HERE IS THE FLOOR PLAN OF THE PROPOSED UNIT. THE FLOOR PLAN ON THE LEFT IS THE MAIN BUILDING. BUILDING A, WITH THE GREAT ROOM ACTIVITY. SOME OF THE THINGS I MENTIONED. IN THE CENTER FOR A PLAN, JUST HIGHLIGHTING SOME OF THE FLOOR PLANS THROUGHOUT THE OTHER TWO BUILDINGS. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, IT IS IMPORTANT TO HIGHLIGHT WHAT IS REQUIRED ACCORDING TO THE CODE, AS OPPOSED TO WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED. OVERALL, THE APPLICANT WILL BE PROVIDING 76 TREES IN ADDITION TO THE 27 VARIETY TREES THAT WILL BE PRESERVED ON THE PROPERTY, AS WELL AS 59 PRESERVED PALM TREES ON THE PROPERTY. WHEN WE BRING IT ALL TOGETHER WITH THE RENDERINGS, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, THIS IS ESSENTIALLY WHAT THE SITE WILL LOOK LIKE. AGAIN, HIGHLIGHTING THE LAKE THAT'S IN THE BACKGROUND WITH THE FOUNTAIN.

WE'VE GOT COME OVER HERE, THE TOT LOT AREA. A DUNSTER LOCATION. AGAIN, THIS WOULD BE THE MAIN BUILDING WITH ENTRANCE TO THE CLUBHOUSE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE SEVEN FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. NUMBER ONE, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AND MAINTENANCE WILL BE APPROVED AND SHALL ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOLLOWING . NUMBER TWO, A FIVE FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTH 31ST STREET TO PROVIDE SITE CONNECTIVITY TO THE EXISTING OKEECHOBEE ROAD SITE WALK. NUMBER THREE, A 12.5 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY DONATION ON SOUTH 31ST STREET . NUMBER FOUR, PRIOR TO THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, A MAINTENANCE PLAN AND AGREEMENT SIGNED BY THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR ENTITIES SHALL BE NOTARIZED AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY . THE AGREEMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL STORMWATER FACILITIES AND SHALL ENSURE THAT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM HAS A PLAN FOR THE REMOVAL OF INVASIVE EXOTICS AND VEGETATION TO ENSURE NO REGROWTH OF THE SAME. NUMBER FIVE, SIGNED PERMITS SHALL BE FILED SEPARATELY DURING THE PERMIT PROCESS. SIX, UPDATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO LAND CLEARING AND DEVELOPMENT. AND SEVEN, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY SITE CLEARING PERMITS THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A TREE MITIGATION SURVEY AND COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF FT. PIERCE FOR

[01:35:01]

>> THANK YOU. DID YOU GO BACK ONE PAGE FOR ME? CONDITIONS TWO AND THREE. CAN YOU WALK ME THROUGH THOSE ? MAYBE JUST

LOOKING AT THE SITE MAP. >> OKAY. I WILL DO MY BEST. I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT CAN MOORE EXPOUND ON IT. BECAUSE THESE ARE MORE CONDITIONS THAT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PUT IN

PLACE. >> OKAY. ARE YOU GUYS PREPARED TO ILLUSTRATE THOSE A LITTLE BIT FOR ME? THE SIDEWALK ON 31ST STREET . WE WILL GET TO IN A SECOND. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE THAT COVERED. I JUST HAD A QUESTION ABOUT WHAT THAT WAS GOING TO LOOK LIKE. I HAD ONE OTHER QUESTION.

>> CHAIRMAN, IF I MAY, JUST REAL QUICK. AGAIN, THE APPLICANT CAN EXPOUND MORE ON IT. BUT WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SIDEWALK, THE DISCUSSION, THIS, RIGHT HERE, AS MY ARROW IS DRIVING, THIS WOULD BE 31ST EXCEL 31ST STREET. THIS IS WHERE THE CONVERSATION IS AS FAR AS THE SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY, AS WELL AS THE 12.5 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION.

>> IS THERE SECONDARY AXIS PROPOSED FOR THIS?

>> NO, SIR. THIS WOULD BE THE ONLY ACCESS ONTO OKEECHOBEE

ROAD. >> DID THE FIRE DISTRICT COMMENT

ON THAT AT ALL? >> WHAT THEY WANTED WAS TO TURN AROUND AND IT SATISFIED TO THE TURNAROUND. BEING ABLE TO COME INSIDE THE PROPERTY AND TEND TO RESIDENCE. MAINLY, I DO BELIEVE THERE IS A CANAL SOMEWHERE HERE. SO IT'S PREVENTING THAT

ADDITIONAL ACCESS. >> OKAY.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?

>> I WOULD LIKE THE APPLICANT TO COME FORWARD. CAN WE PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM? STATE YOUR NAME AND SIGN IN.

>> SURE. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER. JARED WITH WGA. I'M ONE OF THE PLANNERS FOR THE PROJECT. WE HAVE SOME BACKUP SLIDES. WE DON'T NEED TO COVER EVERYTHING . MR. DRIVERS PRESENTATION DID A GOOD JOB OF THAT. BUT I CAN SHOW YOU ON THE SITE PLAN WITH THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AND SIDEWALK ARE

LOCATED. >> WE HAVE A FEW SLIDES HERE FOR QUESTIONS ON VARIOUS ITEMS. I THINK WE CAN SKIP AHEAD TO THE SITE PLAN AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS RELATED TO THAT ITEM.

SO, HERE, WE HAVE THE SITE PLANS AND WE CAN ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT.

SO THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REQUESTED A 12 POINT -- 12.5 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 31ST STREET. SEE CAN SEE, DIMENSION, HERE, IS ON THIS WEST PERIMETER. YOU CAN SEE THAT 12.5 FOOT OFFSET. AND IT GOES UP TO WHERE NEBRASKA STREET TURNS TO THE WEST, THERE. SO THE DEDICATION IS ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE UNTIL YOU GET TO THIS POINT. THEN YOU HAVE A FIVE FOOT SIDEWALK CONNECTION THAT CONNECTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE DEDICATION AREA, ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE SIDEWALK ON

OKEECHOBEE ROAD. >> THE SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY FOR

POTENTIAL ROADWAY WIDENING . >> EXACTLY. SO THE FUTURE ROADWAY WIDENING , SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS IN OTHER DIRECTIONS AS WELL.

>> AND YOU ARE PROPOSING A LEFT-HAND TURN LANE ON

OKEECHOBEE? >> YES WE ARE. WE HAVE A LEFT

TURN INTO THE PROJECT, THERE. >> MS. CLEMENS, DO YOU HAVE A

QUESTION? >> I SEE A BUS SHELTER THERE.

>> THE ONLY THING I WOULD POINT OUT , WE'LL SEE A LOOP RIGHT

[01:40:02]

>> I COULD SPEAK TO THAT. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, THE BUS SHELTER IN THE CIRCULATION FOR THE BUS STOP. OUR PREFERENCE WOULD BE, SINCE TRAFFIC IS -- THAT THE SCHOOL BUS WOULD STOP HERE ON OKEECHOBEE ROAD AND STUDENTS TO TRAVEL TO AND FROM THE BUS SHELTER, HERE. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT EXPRESSED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE THE BUS TO COME INTO THE SITE AND CIRCULATE DOWN TO THE BUS STOP SHELTER. SO WE DID PROVIDE AUTO TURN EXHIBIT. THEY REVIEWED THAT AND THEY ACCEPTED THAT BUS SHELTER LOCATION ON

OKEECHOBEE ROAD. >> OBVIOUSLY, THE PRIORITY IS TO NOT HAVE THE BUSES STOPPING ON OKEECHOBEE. WE TRY TO BACK UP THE SCHOOL BOARD AND HELP THEIR BUS ROUTE TIMING BY NOT HAVING THESE LONGER TRAVEL ROUTES TO THE COMMUNITY. IF THEY HAVE REVIEWED THIS AND ACCEPTED IT THEN THAT IS ON THEM. THE PRIORITY THAT WE EXPRESSED HERE IS THAT WE GET THE BUS STOP'S OFF OF THESE MAJOR THOROUGHFARES. ESPECIALLY OKEECHOBEE. I KNOW THERE'S A FEW PLACES WHERE THE SCHOOL BUSES DO STOP ON OKEECHOBEE AND IT'S NOT GOOD. ADDING ANYMORE TO THAT COULD BE A STEP IN THE WRONG DIRECTION.

>> UNDERSTOOD. >> YOU WANT TO ADD THAT AS AN IF

ITEM? ADD IT AS AN EIGHT ITEM? >> THE SITE PLAN ACCOMMODATES THE TURN RADIUS THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD NEEDS . IF THE SCHOOL BOARD DOESN'T HAVE ANY COMMENTS THAT I DON'T REALLY SEE THE NEED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE ANY FURTHER. I MEAN, WE CAN'T FORCE THE SCHOOL BOARD TO TELL HER BUS DRIVERS TO GO INTO THE

COMMUNITY. >> I WAS CONCERNED ON UNLOADING AT OKEECHOBEE VERSUS ON THE SITE . I WOULD JUST LIKE TO KNOW THAT

THAT IS IN FACT GOING TO HAPPEN. >> THAT'S WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HAS INDICATED. YOU HAVE COMMUNICATIONS WITH THEM.

CORRECT? >> YES, CORRECT.

>> MY ONLY CONCERN WOULD BE, IF DOWN THE ROAD , THEY FIND THAT IMPLEMENTING THAT PLAN IS CAUSING THEM TOO MUCH TIME THEY SHIFT TO DOING THE PICK UP DROP OFF ON OKEECHOBEE.

>> WE CAN REGULATE THAT. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE

APPLICANT? >> MAILING QUESTION OR COMMENT IS, THESE BUILDINGS ARE JUST SO CLOSE TO THE ROAD. IT IS A BUILDING RIGHT NEXT TO A VERY BUSY STREET. THINKING ABOUT OVERALL WELL-BEING AS THE CITY GROWS. THAT IS ONE OF MY CONCERNS AS FAR AS NOISE, TRAFFIC AND MAKING SURE PEOPLE HAVE A DWELLING THAT IS SAFE AND NOISE THAT IS AN ISSUE , ESPECIALLY IN GROWING CITIES. WHY DID YOU CHOOSE TO HAVE THE BUILDING SO CLOSE TO THE ROAD VERSUS A LAKE, POND, LANDSCAPING

OR THINGS LIKE THAT? >> REQUESTED. THAT'S SOMETHING WE ACTUALLY COORDINATED WITH THE CITY ON IN DETAIL. SO WE WANTED TO CREATE A STREETSCAPE ELEMENT. WITH LANDSCAPING, SOME OF THE RENDERINGS SHOW WHERE THE LANDSCAPING WORKED WITH THE BUILDING FACADES ALONG THE STREETSCAPE THERE. THIS KIND OF SHOWS IT. WE HAD PALMS AND VERTICAL ELEMENTS WHERE THERE ARE MORE VERTICAL STRUCTURES ALONG THE BUILDINGS AND WE HAD THAT EXISTING WALKWAY ALONG OKEECHOBEE. SO WE REALLY WANTED TO CREATE KIND OF A STREETSCAPE ATMOSPHERE THERE WERE IT'S NOT JUST A HUGE PARKING LOT BETWEEN THE MAIN ROAD AND THE BUILDINGS.

YOU ACTUALLY HAVE THE BUILDINGS UP AGAINST THE MAIN ROAD. AND THEN YOU HAVE THE PARKING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE. ANOTHER BUILDING A PEER THAT IS OVERLOOKING THE POND AND THE WETLAND IN THE BACK. THAT WAS PART OF THE DESIGN THAT WE WERE MEETING WITH THAT DESIGN OF THE BUILDINGS.

>> AS A PERSON WHO HAS LIVED IN APARTMENTS, TRAFFIC NOISE IS AN

ISSUE. >> IT'S THE NORMAL PLANNING URBAN DESIGN CRITERIA THAT WE ARE TRYING TO IMPLEMENT IN THE

[01:45:02]

HOUSING IS USUALLY BUILT NOW WITH ADEQUATE SOUNDPROOFING. TO LOCATIONS. THIS IS A NORMAL PLANNING PROCESS.

>> I GUESS AS LONG AS SOUNDPROOFING IS ADEQUATE.

THAT'S THE CONCERN FOR ME, PERSONALLY . FOR PEOPLE TO HAVE THE BUILDING RIGHT THERE. IT IS PART URBAN PLANNING. BIGGER CITIES, OF COURSE, HAVE THIS. OKEECHOBEE IS A BIG RED. YES IT

IS. >> PEOPLE HAVE THE OPTION TO

LIVE HERE OR NOT. >> IN THIS RENDERER, THIS IS OKEECHOBEE IN THE FOREGROUND, HERE THE BOTTOMLESS THEY ARE SEEING. AT THIS STAGE IN THE APPLICATION PROCESS, DO WE HAVE A LANDSCAPE PLAN OR IS THAT STILL COMING?

>> YES. >> CAN YOU GO TO THAT?

>> THAT'S PART OF THE SLIDES HERE. BUT I DO HAVE THAT PRINTED OUT IN FRONT OF ME HERE . STAFF HAS IT.

>> I'M JUST WONDERING IF TREES MIGHT BE A BETTER ELEMENT IMPLEMENT ALONG OKEECHOBEE. WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK ABOUT THAT? ASSUMING WHAT WAS SHOWN IN THE RENDERING IS A GOOD REPRESENTATION OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

>> IT'S NOT NECESSARILY. THAT WAS A CONCEPTUAL RENDERING.

EXCUSE ME. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, WE HAVE A LOT OF -- PALMS. A SKINNY, LONG THAT FRONTAGE. AS WELL AS SOME OTHER TREES.

BETTER, TALLER. SO THE RENDERING IS NOT NECESSARILY SHOWING THE

HEIGHT OF THAT MATERIAL . >> GOT IT. OKAY.

>> YEAH. AND COMPARED TO THE RENDERING, A LITTLE MORE SIGNIFICANT LANDSCAPING BUFFER . MORE SIGNIFICANT LANDSCAPING , KIND OF NOT HAVING THE BUILDINGS LOOK SO EXPOSED FROM THE STREET

VIEW. >> THAT WOULD HELP. FOR THE RECORD, I'M OPPOSED TO HAVING BUILDINGS. I THINK THE LAKE OR POND COULD HAVE BEEN THERE VERSUS THE BUILDINGS. STILL HAVE A PARKING LOT. THAT'S MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE AND OPINION FOR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. JUST THINKING ABOUT PEOPLE CAN CHOOSE NOT TO LIVE THERE BUT WE WANT PEOPLE TO LIVE HERE. IN THE FUTURE, DEFINITELY , WE SHOULD MAYBE RECONSIDER THESE THINGS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT NECESSARILY HEALTHY FOR PEOPLE TO HAVE SUCH NOISE. -- HAVE A BRICK BUILDING WE HAVE TRUE NOISE ABATEMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION. THE MATERIALS ARE NOT THE SAME. MY

OPINION. >> IN ADDITION TO THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL , -- SHOWN ON THE CONCEPTUAL RENDERING. THE MATERIALS OF THE BUILDING AS PART OF THE INNOVATIVE DESIGN EXTERIOR WITH SOME OTHER MATERIALS THAT ARE MORE DURABLE TO HELP PROVIDE THAT SOUND BARRIER AS WELL.

>> HOW DOES THIS DESIGN VOLUNTEER OVERALL AESTHETIC,

ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES? >> THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE BEEN

ASKING FOR. >> DO YOU HAVE ANY PHASING

[01:50:10]

PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT? >> JUST ONE PHASE.

>> YOU HAVE A PLAYGROUND AND DOG PARK?

>> YES. WE DO HAVE A CLUBHOUSE WITH THE VARIOUS AMENITIES INSIDE. WE HAVE A TOP LOT, AND OUTDOOR FITNESS AREA AND A GAZEBO OVERLOOKING THE LAKE. AND WE ALSO HAVE SEVERAL BICYCLE KIOSK THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. WHICH INCLUDE TIRE PUMP STATION

AND OTHER ITEMS FOR BICYCLES. >> A DOG PARK AS WELL.

>> I DON'T BELIEVE WE HAVE A DOG PARK.

>> WAY STATIONS. OKAY. WAY STATIONS.

>> NOT HAVING A SECOND ENTRY EXIT, IS THERE ANY CONCERN WITH TRAFFIC GOING EASTBOUND COMING INTO OKEECHOBEE ON 31ST?

>> -- CIVIL ENGINEER. I WILL ALSO SIGN IN. HER PEER QUESTION

AGAIN. SORRY. >> SO NOT HAVING -- LEADING UP TO NEBRASKA, IS THERE ANY ISSUE OR CONCERN WITH EASTBOUND TRAFFIC GETTING ONTO OKEECHOBEE ROAD AND CROSSING THE LANES AND

THE MEDIAN TO GET OUT ? >> NO, THERE IS NOT. AS PART OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS TO THE CITY, WE DID THE FULL TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE 25TH STREET. AS WELL AS A SIGNAL JUST UP THE ROAD AT 31ST. IT BREAKS UP TRAFFIC FAIRLY WELL.

EVEN IN THE A.M. PEAK HOURS THE TRAFFIC WORKS JUST FINE AS FAR AS PEOPLE BEING ABLE TO GET OUT THERE. IT'S A PROTECTED MEDIAN . ALSO, THE SEGMENT OF OKEECHOBEE, IF YOU RECALL, YOU HAVE MEDIANS WITH LANDSCAPING OUT FRONT THAT SHOULD ALSO HELP WITH SOME OF THE ROAD NOISE. THAT WOULD ALLOW PEOPLE TO GET OUT INTO THAT MEDIAN OPENING AND MAKE THAT EASTBOUND LEFT AND HOW

INTO OKEECHOBEE. >> HE SAID 31ST OR 35TH?

>> 33RD. >> 33RD. SORRY. NOT 31ST.

>> MY APOLOGIES. >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE

APPLICANT? >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> IF THERE ARE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS APPLICATION, PLEASE COME FORWARD AT THIS TIME. I'M SEEING NONE. I WILL SEND IT BACK TO THE BOARD FOR ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. I DO SHARE YOUR CONCERNS, CARTER. IT'S AN ASCETIC CHOICE. I'M GOING TO SAY CULTURAL CHOICE. IS NOT THE RIGHT WORD THOUGH. IT'S KIND OF LIKE AN URBAN VERSUS SUBURBAN FEEL. I THINK FT. PIERCE HAS KIND OF AN INTERESTING INTERSECTION FOR THOSE TWO THINGS IN CERTAIN PARTS.

CERTAINLY DOWNTOWN. AS A VERY CITY , SMALL SIDEWALK FRONT FACING KIND OF FEEL. WHEREAS OUR OTHER, LARGER EXPANDED AREAS HAVE MUCH MORE GREEN SPACE. SO THERE IS A LOT OF THAT VARIETY.

I WAS GOING TO ASK STAFF ABOUT THIS. JUST THE HISTORY ON THIS PARCEL. ALL THE FRONTAGE PROPERTIES ON OKEECHOBEE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA , ALL IS COMMERCIAL ZONED. I'M CURIOUS IF THIS IS COMMERCIAL AND REZONED TO RESIDENTIAL?

>> THERE ARE PREVIOUS SITE PLANS THAT ARE APPROVED BUT IT IS STILL RESIDENTIAL. AND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT EARLY 2020. --

REZONING TOOK PLACE. >> YOU WOULD HAVE TO RESEARCH .

I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO IT. I WAS JUST CURIOUS IF THERE IS ANY RECENT HISTORY ON INTO THAT YOU WERE AWARE . OTHER THAN THAT, I'M READY TO ENTERTAIN EMOTIONLESS THERE IS FOR THE

DISCUSSION. >> I DO UNDERSTAND THE URBAN FEEL. IT HAS THAT URBAN DOWNTOWN. AS A TRUE DOWNTOWN. I

[01:55:07]

>> WE CAN ALSO ADDRESS, WHICH I FIND VERY FRUSTRATING , IS IT IS NOT A EUROPEAN THING. JUST BECAUSE OF MY ACCENT , I AM NOT TRYING TO PUSH EUROPEAN IDEAS. THESE ARE IDEAS THAT HAVE COME FROM THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION. THE CAMPAIGN FOR NEW URBANISM . JUST GENERAL, GOOD PLANNING CONCEPT. SO I FIND THAT FRUSTRATING. I GET THE THROWN AT ME ALL THE TIME. I

DON'T THINK THAT'S JUSTIFIED. >> THERE'S A SUBJECTIVE NATURE TO IT THAT I WAS GOING TO BE THERE. SOME PEOPLE SEE IT AND

SOME DON'T. >> -- FROM -- COMMUNITIES , A DEVELOPER FOR SUNRISE VILLAGE. I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU ADDITIONAL PEACE OF MIND ON THE NOISE FACTOR. AS PART OF OUR FUNDING PROCESS WE HAVE TO DO AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY. ONE OF THE ASPECTS OF IT IS NOISE. IT IS CALLED A STRAP CAT ANALYSIS. THE ARCHITECT AND REVIEWER GET TOGETHER AND ANALYZE THE BUILDING, THE MATERIALS. THESE BUILDINGS PASSED BELOW 70 DECIBELS THAT IS CONSIDERED NOISE OR SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT. WE KEEP THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. WE WANT TO ADD THAT WE ARE VERY EXCITED TO BE PART OF A DEVELOPMENT HERE.

AGAIN, WE JUST COMPLETED , IN 2023, BLUE SKY COMMITTEES. I'M SORRY, BLUE SKY COMMITTEES COMPLETED BLUE SKY LANDINGS. SO WE ARE VERY HAPPY TO BE BACK AND BRING AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO THE COMMUNITY AND HELP OUT AS MUCH AS WE CAN. WE THANK STAFF FOR SUPPORTING US AND GIVING US THE OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE A NICE HOME FOR 106 FAMILIES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. FOR YOUR

CONSIDERATION. >> ANYTHING ELSE FROM THE BOARD?

>> PART OF THE SAME SUBJECT. WE WENT THROUGH THE SITE PLAN SO FAST. AESTHETICALLY, FROM THE STREET, IT WOULD BE NICE IN THE FRONT. IT BECOMES A FUNCTIONAL AREA, A GATHERING PLACE IN THE BACK TOO FOR THE RESIDENTS. IT COULD BE A VERY NICE, QUIET PLACE FOR RESIDENTS TO ENJOY ALSO.

>> SORRY. WE WANTED THINGS TO BE PUSHED TO THE STREET WITH THIS SO WE COULD RETAIN AS MUCH OPEN SPACE IN THE REAR OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AND WE HAVE AN OVERVIEW OF THE WHOLE SITE PLAN . YOU WILL SEE THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT AREA WHERE WE DO HAVE ALL OF THE AMENITIES IN THE WETLANDS AND EVERYTHING ELSE PRESERVED. SO THAT'S THE CHOICE THAT WE ARE TRYING TO GIVE THEM ENTITIES TO PEOPLE TO COME INTO THE CITY. NOT ARE QUIETER AND MORE OUT OF THE BUSYNESS. -- BUILDING CODE AND COMPLY WITH THAT. I KNOW THESE BUILDINGS ARE BLOCKED. WHATEVER BUILDING MATERIAL WILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE.

>> ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE? I'M HEARING NONE.

>> JUST HAD A LITTLE MORE INFORMATION, THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT THAT THE APPLICANT SPOKE OF THE HAS BEEN UPLOADED WITH THE APPLICANT FILE , IF YOU WANT TO REA MORE UP ON IT TO UNDERSTAND . TO VERIFY WHAT THE APPLICANT STATED. THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE APPLICANT FILE. THANK YOU.

[02:00:02]

>> THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I BELIEVE WE HAVE SEVEN CONDITIONS. FOR THIS

APPLICATION. >> I MOVE FOR APPROVAL WITH

SEVEN CONDITIONS. >> SECOND.

>> A MOTION FOR APPROVAL WAS SEVEN CONDITIONS BY MS. CLEMONS.

SECOND BY MR. WIDING. >> WIDING? JOHNSON? CARTER?

COLLINS? CLEMONS? CHAIR KREISL? >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY

[7. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Any person who wishes to comment on any subject may be heard at this time. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less, as directed by the Chair, as this section of the Agenda is limited to thirty minutes. The Planning Board will not be able to take any official actions under Comments from the Public. Speakers will address the Board and the Public with respect. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated.]

[8. DIRECTOR'S REPORT]

>> WE HELD THE FIRST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OUTREACH EVENT AT THE RIVERWALK CENTER. LAST WEEK. THERE WILL BE A SECOND OUTREACH ON OCTOBER THE NINTH , WHICH IS DISCUSSING THE UPDATE TO THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN. WITHIN ALL OF THAT TIME RANGE THERE IS A SURVEY ONLINE THAT PEOPLE CAN ACCESS THROUGH OUR WEBSITE TO MAKE COMMENTS AND ANSWER QUESTIONS ON VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE CITY BEING RUN BY THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. AND THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES WITHIN THE CITY TO MAKE A COMMENT ON WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN THE FUTURE. I WILL BE PREPARING A MEMO TO BOTH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY COMMISSION RELATING TO STATE BILL 108. THAT IS A VERY UNUSUAL BILL THAT WAS INITIALLY DEALING WITH A HURRICANE AND REBUILDING HURRICANE DAMAGE , AND TO ALLOW THE PROCESS TO GO THROUGH QUICKER. BUT WITHIN THAT BILL , THERE IS AN ELEMENT THAT IF THE CITY OR COUNTY ARE WITHIN A CERTAIN RADIUS OF THE HURRICANE HAS HIT FLORIDA , AND THERE ARE PROVISIONS THAT RESTRICT ANY CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR ZONING REGULATIONS , WHICH ARE MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THOSE WHICH ARE ALREADY IN PLACE, WE ARE AFFECTED . WE'VE BEEN IN PROXIMITY TO A HURRICANE . AND I THINK THAT TIME PERIOD LASTS TWO YEARS. WHEN ARE WE NOT WITHIN THE RADIUS OF THIS HURRICANE OR EMERGENCY DECLARATION? SO WE'VE GOT TO BE VERY CAREFUL IN TERMS OF WHAT WE PROPOSE FOR CO-AMENDMENTS. THE WORK THAT WE ARE DOING BEHIND THE SCENES.

SPECIFICALLY, LOOKING AT LANDSCAPE PROVISION. A PROPOSAL BY THE STAFF OR THE CITY TO INCREASE LANDSCAPE PROVISION WITHIN A SITE PLAN , WITHIN CODE. APPLICANTS CAN DO THIS TO INCREASE THEIR OWN LANDSCAPE PROVISION IF THEY WANTED TO. TO ENFORCE THAT , WE ARE BEING PUT IN A CORNER. IT'S NOT JUST GOING TO BE LANDSCAPING. IT'S GOING TO BE OTHER DESIGN THINGS. IT'S GOING TO BE ANY CODE CHANGES OR CHANGES TO THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN WHICH CAN BE PERCEIVED TO BE MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN WE ARTY HAVE. FOR AGENCIES THAT WE MADE, JUST GOING THROUGH REVIEWS NOW , HAVING THEM THROWN BACK . WITHIN THEM , THEY HAVE INCORPORATED THINGS THAT MAYBE CONSIDERED TO BE MORE RESTRICTIVE. THERE'S ANOTHER ASPECT WITH THE STATE REGULATED THE AMOUNT OF THINGS IN THE CITY THAT YOU ARE ABLE TO DO. THERE'S ONLY ONE OR TWO LINES THAT REALLY MAKE THAT POINT. IT IS SUCH A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO THE DIRECTION WE WOULD LIKE THE CITY TO BE MOVING I

THINK. >> SO IS THIS BASED ON WHEREVER

[02:05:06]

PASSED? >> WHATEVER DATE THAT IS, I WILL FIGURE IT OUT. IT MAY BE THE ENACTING BILL OR MAYBE A DATE THAT IS SPECIFIED IN THE BILL. ESSENTIALLY, WHAT WE HAVE IN TERMS OF DEMANDING THINGS THAT ARE NOT ALREADY IN THE CODE . IT ALLOWS US TO GO THE OTHER WAY TO MAKE THE PROCESS SIMPLER , TAKE OBLIGATIONS OR WHATEVER. WE DON'T HAVE A SIGNIFICANT CODE IN THAT DIRECTION. WE WERE LOOKING AT HOW WE GET A GOOD STANDARD OF DEVELOPMENT COMING IN. WE ARE FORTUNATE . WE HAVE THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND WE'VE DONE SOME OF THE OTHER CODE CHANGES, WHICH DO HELP. THERE WAS A LOT. THERE'S A LOT THAT WE WERE WORKING ON THAT WE NOW HAVE TO REVISIT TO SAY, IS THIS MAKING IT MORE DIFFICULT FOR AN APPLICANT? THE CHALLENGE THAT? WE WILL ALSO DO A FULL ANALYSIS OF THE STAFF THAT WILL BE COMING FORWARD WITH ANOTHER MEMO PRESENTATION BASED ON SOME OF THE CONTENTS OF THE LIVE LOCAL ACT HAVE BEEN CHANGED.

RECENTLY. WHICH INVOLVE CHURCH PROPERTY . I THINK, FROM WHAT I'M READING , THAT PROCESS FOR DEALING WITH LIVE LOCAL APPLICATIONS ON CHURCH PROPERTY IS MORE A DETERMINATION BY CITY COMMISSION OF WHETHER THEY WANT STAFF TO DEAL WITH THAT OR ANOTHER PROCESS TO DEAL WITH THAT , WHICH COULD BE THE SAME PROCESS THAT WE HAVE ALREADY. I THINK I DO THAT AS AN ITEM FOR DISCUSSION BECAUSE WE WILL HAVE TO TAKE IT TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR THEIR DETERMINATION OF WHETHER OR NOT THEY WANT TO KEEP THE NORMAL, TECHNICAL REVIEW PLANNING BOARD , CITY COMMISSION ROUTE FOR DEVELOPMENT ON CHURCH PROPERTIES. YEAH. WE ARE DEALING WITH A NUMBER OF LEGISLATIVE DIRECTIVES. WE DO HAVE AN UPDATE FOR OUR LOBBYIST REPRESENTATIVES THIS MORNING. I THINK THAT'S ONLINE. YOU CAN PROBABLY SEE THAT ABOUT POTENTIAL FOR UPCOMING BILLS AND DIRECTION FROM THE STATE . THERE MAY BE ANOTHER RAFT OF LEGISLATION THAT COMES THROUGH AND AFFECT'S WHAT WE DO. WE WILL WAIT ON THAT.

[9. BOARD COMMENTS]

>> THANK YOU, MR. FREEMAN. ANY COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD?

>> THANK YOU FOR THE DISCUSSION. I APPRECIATE IT.

>> THANK YOU. >> I'

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.