Nov 12, 2025 FPRA Regular Meeting Agenda

[1. CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:09]

>>> I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. IT IS WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 12TH. PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF

ALLEGIANCE. >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND

JUSTICE FOR ALL. >> CALLED THE ROLE PLEASE.

[4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

>> MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 9TH 2025 FPRA MEETING.

>> SO MOVED. >> SECONDED .

>> PLEASE CALL THE ROLE. >> NEXT IS THE APPROVAL OF THE

[5. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF AGENDA]

>> CALL THE ROLE PLEASE. >> THE

>> NEXT IS ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA , AT THE STAFF REQUEST.

>> ITEMS C , AND -- >> 7- G.

>> C AND G ? DO YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION ?

>> I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ACCEPT THE AGENDA WITH THE NECESSARY ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT.

>> MOTION AND SECOND, CALL THE ROLL.

>> . CAN I GET IN THE EXPLANATION AS TO WHY THIS WAS OLD ? -- COLD

? >> PERHAPS IS THERE A STAFF

MEMBER THAT CAN ANSWER THAT? >> MADAM CHAIR, YES MA'AM, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, THERE WAS NOT A SIGNED AGREEMENT YET IN PLACE, WE ARE STILL WAITING ON THE SIGNED AGREEMENT. IT IS NOT THAT IT IS NOT COMING BACK BEFORE YOU, WE ARE WAITING TO

GET THE SIGNED AGREEMENT. >> FROM THE APPLICANT?

>> CORRECT. >> THAT IS ITEM CAPITAL G?

>> AND THAT IS THE MEDICATION I WOULD ASSUME?

>> YES, SIR. >> ITEM C, SOMEONE IN THE AUDIENCE MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN MY ITEM C WAS PULLED.

>> I DO NOT HAVE THAT . >> IT WAS PULLED BECAUSE IT WAS APPROVED AT THE PREVIOUS SPECIAL MEETING, IN OCTOBER. HOWEVER, IT

WAS REMOVED FROM THIS AGENDA. >> SO, WE ARE NOT GOING TO DO IT

TWICE. >> OKAY. HAVE WE VOTED ON THE

CONSENT AGENDA? >> NO.

>> I THINK , I THINK YOU ALREADY DID THAT.

>> WE SENT THE AGENDA. NOT YET, MADAM.

>> ALL RIGHT , THAT IS ALL RIGHT. WE WANT ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS, DID WE TAKE A VOTE ON THE AGENDA? OKAY, SO, WE WILL MOVE TO THE NEXT ITEM, THANK YOU FOR KEEPING ME STRAIGHT,

EVERYBODY. >> NEXT ITEM IS COMMENTS FROM

THE PUBLIC. >> ANY PERSON HE WANTS TO

[7. CONSENT AGENDA]

ON. >> NEXT IS CONSENT AGENDA, IS THERE ANYTHING FROM ANY FPRA MEMBER ?

>> IS THERE A MOTION? >> MOVED TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE TWO ITEMS QUESTIONED BY STAFF TO BE

PULLED. >> SECOND.

>> CALLED THE ROLL. >>

[A. FPRA Resolution 25-18 - Entering into an Interlocal Funding Agreement Between the FPRA and St. Lucie County for the Harbour Pointe Park Boat Ramp in an amount not to exceed $500,000.00]

>> NEXT, IT IS RESOLUTION 25-18, A RESOLUTION FOR THE DEPENDENT SPECIAL DISTRICT OF FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA, ANY AGREEMENT, FOR THE HARBOUR POINTE PARK CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, PROVIDING FINDINGS , AUTHORIZATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

>> GENTLEMEN, IS THERE A MOTION? >> I THINK THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN

PRETTY MUCH COVERED. >> WITH THAT, I WILL MAKE A

MOTION. >> SECOND.

[00:05:01]

>> CALLED THE ROLL, PLEASE. >> COMMISSIONER GAINES, COMMISSIONER JOHNSON ? CHAIRWOMAN HUDSON? INDISCERNIBLE - OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ]

>> CAN I LAUNCH MY BOAT ? >> GO GET IT DONE.

[B. FPRA Resolution 25-19 Entering an Interlocal Funding Agreement Between the FPRA and the City of Fort Pierce for the Avenue D Resurfacing Project in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000.00]

>> I WILL HOLD IT AT THAT. >> NEXT, IT IS FPRA RESOLUTION 25-19 , ENTERING INTO THE INTER- LOCAL AGREEMENT, PROVIDING FINDINGS, PROVIDING AUTHORIZATIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE?

>> YES, WE HAVE PUT IT IN THE BUDGET. WE HAVE BEEN PLANNING ON

THIS FOR A WHILE. >> I JUST HAD ONE QUESTION, I JUST SAID, I WANT TO ENJOY AND FIND OUT WHY WE ARE STOPPING AT 29TH STREET? I AM JUST CURIOUS.

>> THAT RETURNS TO COUNTY ? >> THAT IS WHAT I AM TRYING TO FIND OUT THERE LIKE I SAID, THIS MORNING, I REMEMBERED, IT IS PART OF THIS. THAT IS, THAT IS WHERE WE WERE TRYING TO BUILD ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE 29TH, THAT IS WHERE THEY WERE TRYING TO PUT THAT CELL TOWER, AND, ALL THOSE RESIDENTS CAME IN AND COMPLAINED. I WANT TO MAKE SURE, IF IT IS SOME TYPE OF ROLE, THAT IS WHY WE STOPPED, I DON'T WANT THOSE EMAILS.

>> IT MAKES NO SENSE TO BE STOPPING

>> GOING FROM 29TH STREET, TO INGALLS ROAD. THE CITY MANAGER?

>> IT IS A QUESTION FOR SOMEBODY. ANYWAY.

>> THE MONEY, THAT IS WHERE WE STOPPED, TO HAVE SOME TYPE OF

ANSWER, TO WHERE WE STOPPED. >> HOW FAR IS 29TH?

>> IT IS THE ANGLE, IT IS THE ANGLE, WHAT IS IT? ABOUT SIX

BLOCKS? >> WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO COME

BACK AND ADDRESS THAT. >> IT COULD BE A COUNTY ROAD. IT COULD BE SOMETHING WE JUST DON'T KNOW. I WANT TO KNOW THE

ANSWER. >> MY SUGGESTION, COMMISSIONER GAINES, IF THIS IS A FUNDING MATTER, I THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO THIS BODY FOR DELIBERATION. IT IS A JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE, OKAY, I GET IT. IF IT IS A FUNDING ISSUE, BECAUSE I AGREE, CONTINUITY OF FINISHING THAT THE WOULD MAKE SENSE. BUT I HAPPEN TO THINK THERE IS A DEMARCATION

LINE SOMEWHERE THERE. >> THAT IS WHY, WHEN WE FINISH THIS PROJECT, AND WE STARTED GETTING THESE EMAILS, I JUST WANT AN ANSWER TO WHY IT WAS NOT ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

>> THE DEMARCATION, FPR A -- FPRA ?

>> THAT IS IT, THAT FAR. I JUST WANT TO KNOW THE ANSWER. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THE ANSWER.

SPEAKERS ] >> COMMISSIONER, I THINK YOU ARE

RIGHT. >> THAT'S PERFECT.

>> DIDN'T WE ALSO GET A STATE GRANT ? ISN'T IT A STATE GRANT ? SO, YEAH, YEAH, IT WOULD BE GOOD TO FIND OUT THE ANSWER.

INDISCERNIBLE - OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ]

>> FROM THE CITY OR WHATEVER. >> WE GET EMAILS, THEY NEED AN ANSWER, NOT FIVE DIFFERENT ANSWERS.

>> IT IS THE DEMARCATION FOR THE FPRA THAT WILL NEED TO COME BACK FOR DISCUSSION. THAT IS AN INSUFFICIENT EXCUSE FROM THE

STAFF THERE. >> I JUST WANT AN ANSWER!

>> THEY WILL FOLLOW-UP. >> NO MORE QUESTIONS, I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT RESOLUTION 25-19.

>> SECOND. >> COMMISSIONER JOHNSON?

[C. FPRA Resolution 25-20 Approving an Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Fort Pierce, Fort Pierce Redevelopment Agency, and St. Lucie County for the Development of the Avenue D Model Block Project; Approving a Ground Lease Agreement Between St. Lucie County, the Fort Pierce Redevelopment Agency, and Pinnacle at Moore’s Creek, LLC for the Development of the Avenue D Model Block Project Pursuant to the Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement; Authorizing The Execution of the Lease Agreement and Related Documents]

>> ANY SUGGESTIONS FROM STAFF? >> I HAVE DONE SOME RESEARCH ON THIS TOPIC, IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT IT IS A LAND LEASE, FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT. IS THAT A

CORRECT ASSUMPTION? >> CORRECT.

[00:10:01]

>> I HAVE NO ISSUES, CONCEPTUALLY, WITH THIS. I KNOW IT IS A LONG-TERM LEASE. I AM NOT SURE WHAT THE DURATION OF THE, IT COULD BE A 99-YEAR LEASE. THE ONLY, THE ONLY, AND THIS IS NOT REALLY OUR ISSUE, THIS IS A DEVELOPER ISSUE.

FUNDING , ON AT LEAST LAND IS A CHALLENGE. IS THIS BEING SPUN OFF FOR SALE OR RENTAL? DO WE KNOW THAT OFFHAND?

>> DO YOU WANT TO HELP? >>

SPEAKERS ] >> MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, IT IS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND IT IS A 99-YEAR LEASE, LARGE, TWO PARCELS, THE COUNTY IS LEASING A PARCEL AS WELL, THEY HAVE APPROVED THIS AGREEMENT I THINK ON THE FOURTH WAS WHEN THEY HAD THEIR MEETING, THE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HAS APPROVED IT. THERE IS MUCH MORE DETAIL.

>> THE COMMENTARY IS, IF THIS WAS RESALE UNITS, THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE A PROBLEM. DEVELOPER PACKAGE FINANCING, WITH BEING ABLE TO SECURE FINANCING ON AT LEAST LAND. THAT IS OUR PROBLEM,

NOT OURS. I AM GOOD WITH IT. >> I WAS STANDING BY FOR ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS, BUT THE DEVELOPER IS IN THE AUDIENCE. AS ARE THE COUNTERPART, JENNIFER, AND I WANTED TO MAKE A NOTE THAT THEY ARE HERE, IT HAS BEEN A JOINT EFFORT SINCE THE BEGINNING, WE HAVE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT TO REALLY SPELL OUT THE NEXT STEPS OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AS WELL AS EXECUTING THE GROUND RULES. YOU MAY RECALL THAT THE CITY PARCELS WERE ALSO INCLUDED ORIGINALLY. THEY HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED FROM THE SCOPE, THEY WERE TIED UP WITH SOME OTHER ISSUES AND THE DEVELOPER IS GOING TO FOCUS ON THE COUNTY, THE LARGE PARCEL, AND TO THE SOUTH, AND IT IS A 99-YEAR LEASE. THIS IS GOING TO ESTABLISH SITE CONTROL FOR PEDICLE TO REACH OUT FOR THE LOWER-INCOME TAX CREDITS AND THAT APPLICATION IS COMING UP, I

THINK, NEXT WEEK. >> ANY GROUNDBREAKING?

>> WE DO NOT HAVE A TIMELINE JUST YET.

>> YOU INDICATED THERE ARE SOME CITY OWNED PARCELS AS WELL, NOT

CLEAR TITLE? >> THERE COULD BE, AS WITH ANYTHING, AND I BUILT IT IN THAT THERE ARE TWO PARCELS THAT SUPPORT AND MANY THAT SUPPORT THAT MORRIS CREEK LINEAR PARK.

THEY ARE OFF TO THE SIDE AS WELL, THIS IS SQUARED UP, TO GET IT READY, WITH THE FPRA AND THE COUNTY PARCELS.

>> I AM GOOD. >> ANYTHING ELSE ?

>> I DON'T WANT ANY ROADBLOCKS, ANYTHING FROM PREVENTING GETTING

SHOVELS IN THE GROUND. >> WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS WITH THE PARTNERSHIP, WITH THE COUNTY.

>> YES. >> AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS

HAPPEN. >> WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A

MOTION? >> I MOVED TO APPROVE.

>> SECOND. >> COMMISSIONER GAINES ?

[D. Discussion and Direction on Sunrise Theatre Mural Community Poll Results and Project Update]

>> NEXT IS THE DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION OF THE SUNRISE THEATRE MURAL COMMUNITY POLL RESULTS AND PROJECT UPDATE.

>> MS. DEL GATO? >> OKAY , MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, READY FOR THE PRESENTATION?

>> NOT YET. >> I CAN SEE IT IN THE MIRROR

ARE. >> SUNRISE THEATRE MURAL, WE HAD THE COMMUNITY POLL , I AM BRINGING IN AN UPDATE ON HOW WE CAME ABOUT WITH THE CRA ADVISORY COMMITTEE, APPROVED AS PART OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 BUDGET, THIS IS THE WEST-FACING WALL OF THE SUNRISE THEATER , IT IS A PROMINENT LOCATION IN DOWNTOWN .

AND AS YOU CAN SEE, FROM US-1, OVER THE RAILROAD TRACKS, FROM THE HIGH-SPEED TRAINS GOING BACK.

2025, THE CRA ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEWED THE WEST-FACING WALL.

AFTER CAREFUL EVALUATION THEY SELECTED THE TOP THREE ARTISTS.

THAT IS WHEN THEY RECOMMENDED TO HAVE THE COMMUNITY DECIDE WHICH ONE IS THEIR FAVORITE MURAL , AND BRIAN PETERSON'S DESIGN WAS

[00:15:06]

PREPARING TO GO ON STAGE PRETTY MUCH. AND THE JAZZ PLAYERS AS WELL. AFTER DOING AN INSPECTION ON THE CONDITION OF THE BUILDING, THERE ARE SOME SERVICE CRACKS , AND THEY NEED TO PRIME THE SITE FOR CLEANUP. THAT IS GOING TO COST AN ADDITIONAL $15,000. ON TOP OF THE $75,000.

>>

>> STAFF RECOMMENDS TO REVIEW THE COMMUNITY POLL RESULTS , AND THE DESIGN THAT RECEIVE THE MOST CONSIDER , INC. THE BOARD'S DIRECTION INTO THE FINAL CONTRACT AND RETURN WITH A

FORMAL AGREEMENT FOR APPROVAL. >> CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE, THE , THE ONE AT THE BOTTOM, THAT IS THE REVISED, CORRECT? WHAT I NOTICED, ON SOCIAL MEDIA , THAT PEOPLE COMMENTED , IN THE COMMENTS SECTION, THERE WERE A LOT OF COMMENTS. AS WELL AS, YOU KNOW, 2000 -WHATEVER, THEY DID IT BY SURVEY. IN ADDITION, PEOPLE WERE COMMENTING ON IT. AND PERSONALLY , I THINK EVERYBODY HAS A DIFFERENT IDEA ABOUT WHAT IS APPROPRIATE, WHAT IS NOT, WHAT THEY LIKE, WHAT THEY DON'T LIKE. I LIKE THE REVISED. I WOULD NOT DARE TO START MESSING WITH THAT.

>> I DO HAVE A QUESTION, MADAM CHAIR. CAN YOU GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE? OKAY. THIS , YOU SEE THIS DISCOLORATION IN THE STUCCO FINISH ? THAT IS THE WALL BEHIND IT , I AM ASSUMING, THERE ARE ACTIVE LEAK POINTS . MY SUGGESTION IS, THEY ARE LOOKING TO MAKE A REPAIR ON THE REAR WALL ONLY WHERE THE PAGING, THE MURAL, IS GOING. I SUGGEST THAT THIS SECTION OF WALL IS IN BAD SHAPE, THE BALANCE ARE IN THAT SHAPE AS WELL. WE MAY WANT TO CONSIDER ENCOMPASSING THAT INTO THE SCOPE OF WORK, IF WE ARE DOING $15,000 WORTH OF REPAIRS, THE CONTRACTOR IS ON SITE, LET'S DEAL WITH THE ENTIRE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, THERE ARE ACTIVE LEAKS ALL OVER THE BUILDING, THIS CONDITION EXISTS ON THE OTHER THREE SIDES. I ASSURE YOU IT DOES, THERE ARE ACTIVE LEAK POINTS ALL OVER THE BUILDING. SIMILAR TO STAGING A BUILDING, THE BUILDING ENVELOPE WANTS A COMPROMISE, WE HAVE BIGGER PROBLEMS, WE HAVE DETERIORATION, DELAMINATION OF STUCCO, INTERIOR WATER PENETRATION IN THE BUILDING. IF WE ARE MOBILIZING TO DO $15,000 WORTH OF EXTERIOR WORK, MAYBE WE SHOULD CONSIDER DOING THE WHOLE THING.

>> I SPOKE TO THE INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AS WELL AS THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. WE ARE LOOKING AT DOING THE ENTIRE SIDING AND GETTING QUOTES ON THAT, THERE ARE LAKES IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THAT BUILDING.

>> I CAN TELL YOU, THE ROOF IS SHOT. INSTEAD OF APPROVING $15,000 FOR THE CHANGE TO YOUR, LET'S DO THE ENTIRE BUILDING ENVELOPE AT ONE TIME, THE ROOFING IS A SEPARATE ISSUE.

THAT IS GOING TO BE A PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL UNDERTAKING AS WELL, IT IS UP THERE. JUST SUGGESTING, IF WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A BITE OF THE APPLE, LET'S DO IT THE RIGHT WAY AND DO IT ONE TIME, INSTEAD OF MOBILIZING TWICE. WE WILL BE KICKING OURSELVES FOR

THAT. >> THIS IS GOING TO HELP US GET

TO WHERE WE WANT TO GO. >> MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, MAYBE NOT AS QUICKLY AS YOU WOULD LIKE, IF YOU ARE DISCUSSING CONSTRUCTION OR RENOVATION TO THE ENTIRETY OF THE BUILDING, WE NEED TO GO THROUGH THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS.

WE NEED TO LIKELY DO AN RFP, THE MINIMAL WORK DISCUSSED, WOULD BE JUST FOR THIS AREA, TO PREPARE FOR THE MURAL. IF YOU ARE

[00:20:05]

NEED TO FOLLOW THAT PROCEDURE. >> WELL, I CAN SEE SOMETHING DIFFERENT, MADAM CHAIR. WE ASKED FOR AN ASSESSMENT, THIS HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION, THERE ARE LAKES THAT HAVE BEEN NOTED , THEY ARE THERE, WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR BEFORE WE CAN GET TO THE RFP IS AN ASSESSMENT ON WHERE WE ARE.

>> STILL IN THE PROCESS. >> OKAY, ALL RIGHT, RIGHT NOW, IF YOU ARE ASKING FOR A DECISION TONIGHT ON THIS $15,000, I AM KIND OF AGREEING WITH THE COMMISSIONER OVER YOUR. THIS CAN WAIT, AT LEAST HOWEVER LONG IT IS GOING TO TAKE US, I WOULD RATHER HAVE A TOTAL PICTURE TO REALLY UNDERSTAND YEAR.

INDISCERNIBLE - OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ]

>> IT IS BEING DAMAGED AS WE SPEAK. THAT IS MY CONCERN.

>> I HAVE NOT GOTTEN A QUOTE ON IT. I WENT BACK, AND I TOLD THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, IN THE SOUTHEAST.

>> FOR THE RENOVATION, THE ROOF HAS OUTLIVED ITS PURPOSEFUL

LIFE. >> THIS IS MY TWO CENTS. I LOVE THE MURAL. AND THE COMMENTS ON FACEBOOK. I DO NOT WANT TO PUT A $75,000 MURAL ON THE SIDE OF A BUILDING, WHERE THERE IS WATER COMING IN TO RUIN THE MURAL, AND YOU HAVE TO HAVE THEM COME BACK AND REDO IT, I LOVE THE MURAL, IF WE NEEDED CHECK TO MAKE SURE THAT IT IS UP THERE, WE DO NOT HAVE ALL THESE OTHER PROBLEMS., I AM GOING BACK TO YOUR EXPERTISE, WE FIX THIS SIDE, AND WE DO NOT FIX THE ROOF. AND WE JUST DO IT IN THIS ORDER.

>> I AM SEEING HERE , THIS IS INDICATIVE OF ROOF FLASHING, IT IS LEAKING DOWN BETWEEN THE BLOCK AND THE STUCCO, WHICH IS GOING TO DELAMINATE THE STUCCO. AND WE WILL GET CHUNKS OF IT FALLING OFF. THAT IS MY CONCERN, LET'S FIX IT RIGHT AND GET IT DONE THE FIRST TIME. HE NEEDS TO LOOK AT THE PICTURE IN THE UPPER LEFT, THAT IS CLEARLY AN INDICATOR OF THE PROBLEM, THERE IS WATER PENETRATION THROUGH THE STUCCO , THE ROOF IS SHOT , I AM TELLING YOU IT IS, THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE A SMALL TICKET ITEM.

THE ENTIRE EXTERIOR NEEDS TO BE DONE. COMMISSIONER JOHNSON IS CORRECT. IF YOU WANT TO SPEND ALL THIS MONEY ON A BEAUTIFUL MURAL AND YOU HAVE CHUNKS OF IT HAULING OFF OF THE BUILDING,

WHAT DO WE DO? >> THAT IS MY CONCERN. MY CONCERN IS, WE FINISH IT, THE WATER COMES DOWN, WE GO LOOK AT IT, AND SOME PIECES ARE ON THE GROUND.

>> CAN ANYONE TALK ABOUT PREPPING THE BUILDING CORRECTLY BEFORE SPENDING $75,000 ON A MURAL? IT IS A COMMON RETROFIT .

THIS IS THE PROCESS. THIS IS WHAT IT TAKES. YOU DO IT THE

RIGHT WAY. >> WE ARE SAYING THE SAME THING DIFFERENT WAYS, WE LIKE THE MURAL BUT WE WANT THE MURAL TO BE THERE FOR A LONG TIME, WE WANTED TO A LONG TIME, WE NEED

TO FIX THE BUILDING. >> I ASSURE YOU, IF WE FIX THIS RIGHT NOW, SIX MONTHS AGO, WE WILL HAVE PIECES OF THE MURAL FALLING OFF THE BUILDING THAT THE CITIZENS WILL BE LIKE BUT

DID YOU GUYS DO? >> SO, WE NEED TO HAVE A PROPER MOTION TO DEAL WITH THIS. AND, SO, WHAT WE WANT , WE WANT TO APPROVE THE MURAL BUT WE DO NOT WANT TO DO IT WITH THE BUILDING

COMPROMISE. CAN YOU HELP US? >> MADAM CHAIR, BOARD MEMBERS, IT IS ON FOR DISCUSSION, NOT AN OFFICIAL VOTE. I UNDERSTOOD THE DIRECTIONS PRETTY CLEARLY. LET'S SEE THE ISSUES THAT EXIST, STRUCTURALLY, OR TO THE EXTERIOR BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MURAL. BUT I UNDERSTOOD THE CONSENSUS TO BE, WE WANT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE SELECTED ARTIST . AND THE MINIMALLY-UPDATED DESIGN. WHAT WE CAN DO IS KEEP THAT KIND OF FLOWING WITH THE OTHER ISSUE AND BRINGING THEM BACK BEFORE YOU

[00:25:01]

. AM I RIGHT ? >> RIGHT. IS EVERYTHING ELSE

OKAY? >> I AM FINE WITH THE IMAGE. I DON'T WANT PIECES OF IT FALLING OFF THE BUILDING.

>> SO, MS. SARA DELGADO, YOU NEED TO GO FIX THE BUILDING.

OKAY ? YOU ARE ON IT. >> I AM NOT TELLING YOU WHAT DIRECTION YOU ARE GOING BUT YOU NEED SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF, THE PRICE OF THE ROOF, THERE ARE SO MANY DIFFERENT SYSTEMS OUT THERE, THE EXTERIOR RETROFIT IS WHAT THE VENDOR IS ALREADY PROPOSING, LAYING OUT AND SUBSEQUENTLY SEALING UP THE

EXTERIOR. >> THIS IS EVERYTHING THAT HE IS GOING TO DO, WHICH IS PRESSURE WASH. IT IS CHALKY. YOU DON'T WANT TO JUST PAINT OVER IT, BECAUSE IT IS GOING TO COME APART. BUT WITH PRESSURE WASHING, YOU KNOW? FIXING THE CRACKS, ADDING THE PRIMER, THE ARTIST SAID THAT HE CAN WORK WITH THAT, AND THE ARTIST PROVIDES THE PREP SERVICES IF WE WANTED TO INCORPORATE THAT INTO THE AGREEMENT. IF YOU WANT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH GETTING A BETTER ASSESSMENT ON THE WHOLE BUILDING AND THE ROOF

>> IT SOUNDS TO ME LIKE WE ARE COMPROMISING THE MURAL , IF WE DO JUST THAT, UNTIL WE REALLY ASSESS THE WHOLE BUILDING.

>> THAT IS CORRECT. >> I WANT TO BE CLEAR SO THE ARTIST KNOWS, WE DO LIKE THE MURAL, WE WANT THE MURAL. BUT WE

WANT IT TO LAST. >> OKAY. GO GET TO WORK.

LAUGHTER ] ARE YOU CLEAR? ALL RIGHT . I GUESS, WE WILL MOVE ON. STAFF COMMENTS. ANYBODY ON THE STAFF? NO ? ANY COMMENTS ? NOW WE WILL MOVE ON. WE DO HAVE THE FPRA PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES SUMMARY. I HAVE LOOKED AT THAT . ANY BOARD COMMENTS? ANY BOARD COMMENTS ? OKAY. ARE WE READY TO ADJOURN ? OKAY, WE

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.