[00:00:06]
>> GOOD MORNING. THIS IS THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE COMMISSION. IT IS DECEMBER 8TH, 2025.
I'M CALLING THIS MEETING TO ORDER.
PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
>> I DGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
[4. Approval of Minutes]
>> FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE NOVEMBER 10TH, 2025 DAY MEETING.
>> A MOTION AND A SECOND. CALL THE ROLL,
[6. Additions or deletions to agenda and approval of the agenda.]
>> YES. >> DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA.
>> ANY COMMISSIONER WANT TO ADD OR CHANGE THE AGENDA? IF NOT, I'LL HEAR A MOTION TO
[7. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Any person who wishes to comment on any subject may be heard at this time. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less, as directed by the Mayor, as this section of the Agenda is limited to thirty minutes. The City Commission will not be able to take any official actions under Comments from the Public. Speakers will address the Mayor, Commissioners, and the Public with respect. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated.]
APPROVE.>> YES. >> COMMISSIONER GAINES.
>> ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE COME FORWARD. PLEASE COME FORWARD.
AND -- PLEASE COME FORWARD. AND IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO LINE UP ALONG THE WALL THERE, GOOD MORNING, YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND MISS COX WILL GIVE YOU A TEN SECOND WARNING.
GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE. MY NAME IS MR. MARIO WILCOX, 5227 OAKLAND LAKE CIRCLE, CITY OF FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, 34951.
MADAM MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, CITY MANAGER, CITY CLERK, CITY ATTORNEY, I BESEECH YOU GOOD MORNING.
TODAY I STAND BEFORE YOU INVOLVING THE HIRING OF THE NEW POLICE CHIEF.
I WISH HIM WELL AND I AM A PROPONENT OF OUR MEN AND WOMEN OF UNIFORM, I'M VERY SUPPORTIVE.
I BELIEVE IN THE COMPETITIVE PROCESS.
I BELIEVE IN ADVANCEMENTS, I BELIEVE IN PROMOTIONS.
AND I BELIEVE IN FAIR AND EQUITY AS WELL.
NOW, I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE AWAY FROM THE SELECTION.
IT IS A WELL QUALIFIED GENTLEMAN.
ACTUALLY, ALL OF THEM IS QUALIFIED.
BUT WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND, WE HAD TWO INTERNAL PEOPLE THAT DIDN'T MAKE THE SHORT LIST. AND MAYBE HR COULD GET WITH ME ON THAT. BECAUSE I MATCHED -- I LOOKED AT ALL THE RESUMES. I HAVE COPIES OF EVERYTHING.
AND WHEN I LOOKED AT THE FINALISTS, THEY ARE SO CLOSELY ALMOST DEADLOCKED EVEN WITH THE THREE -- WITH THE FINALISTS. YOU KNOW, IT COULD HAVE BEEN MORE COMPETITIVE, BUT IF YOU WOULD HAVE WENT BACK AND THEN TRIED TO ASK SOMEONE BACK, THAT WOULD HAVE CREATED -- OPENED UP A CAN OF WORMS BECAUSE PEOPLE THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY OMITTED, YOU HAVE TO BRING THEM BACK TOO.
SO, YOU KNOW, MADAM MAYOR, THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA, BUT IT WOULD HAVE OPENED UP A CAN OF WORMS. SO I SAW THAT YOU WERE SUPPORTIVE OF THAT.
>> ADDRESS THE WHOLE COMMISSION.
>> I'M REFERENCING A COMMENT THAT YOU MADE, SO I HAVE TO QUOTE YOU DIRECTLY.
NOW, MOVING FORWARD, I LOOKED AT THE REVIEW COMMITTEE.
I SAW CAPTAIN SANDERFER, CHIEF SANDERFER, HE'LL SAY HISTORIC CHIEF.
I HISTORY OF OUR CITY. WE SAW RETIRED POLICE CHIEF SHAWN BALDWIN. HE CAME UP THROUGH THE RANKS.
NOW WHAT I DIDN'T SEE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN TWO OTHERS. WE HAVE PEOPLE HERE IN FORT PIERCE THAT ALSO SERVED AT THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. I FEEL THE FULL PANEL SHOULD HAVE BEEN PEOPLE OF THOSE CAPACITIES. AND THEN THE CITY MANAGER SHOULD HAVE BEEN REVIEWING THAT. HE DOESN'T HAVE ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT BACKGROUND.
YOU HAVE THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER WHO IS IMPLICATED IN A CRIMINAL CASE.
THAT JUST THROWS A WRENCH IN EVERYTHING.
>> THANK YOU, SIR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WHO'S NEXT? PLEASE COME FORWARD.
[00:05:04]
>> JUST SO THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDS, I'M HAVE SOME -- A LOCKED BACK. IF I DON'T STAND UP, IT IS NOT TO INTIMIDATE ANYBODY. IF I GO OVER THERE --
THANK YOU FOR LETTING US KNOW. YES, MA'AM.
>> MAYOR HUDSON AND COMMISSIONERS --
>> YOU CAN PULL YOUR MICROPHONE DOWN A LITTLE BIT, PLEASE, THANK YOU.
>> I'M MARTHA MCCONKY, 240 8 SOUTH 8TH STREET. OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS THE POWER OF LIFE AND DEATH IN THEIR HANDS EVERY DAY, A TREMENDOUS RESPONSIBILITY.
AND YET YOU HAVE NOT FOLLOWED THEIR RECOMMENDATION FOR OUR NEXT CHIEF OF POLICE.
CALEB GILLETTE. I BELIEVE YOU SHOULD TRUST AND HONOR THEIR DECISION. SERVICE IS A PLACE OF HONOR AND CALEB HAS A HEART FOR SERVICE. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, MA'AM. WHO'S NEXT?
>> MY NAME IS MARTHA MCKEON. 507 QUINCY AVENUE.
I AM IN THE INFAMOUS DISTRICT 2. AND AS I LOOK AT YOU GUYS UP HERE TODAY, THERE IS NOBODY UP ON THAT DAIS THAT REPRESENTS MY DISTRICT. AND YET YOU STILL WANT TO GO AHEAD AND VOTE ON MR. CHESS' SELECTION WHEN WE DON'T EVEN HAVE A VOTE UP THERE. AND I THINK THAT'S ILLEGITIMATE. IT IS ABSOLUTELY THE WRONG THING TO DO AT THIS POINT. WHY THE RUSH? WHY ARE YOU RUSHING THIS THROUGH? IT IS A MONTH FROM THE RUNOFF.
THAT WILL PUT THE FIFTH PERSON UP THERE.
THAT WILL GIVE YOU A MAKE OR BREAK, YOU'LL GET A MAJORITY AND EVERYBODY WILL BE HAPPY. NOT PEOPLE IN DISTRICT 2.
BECAUSE YOU COMPLETELY DISENFRANCHISED WHO WE ARE AS VOTERS. THERE IS NO VOTE HERE FOR US.
IT SEEMS TO BE CONTINUING SITUATION WITH THIS COUNCIL. YOU MAKE IT SO DIFFICULT FOR THE REGULAR PUBLIC TO ATTEND THIS THREE MEETINGS THAT YOU HOLD UP HERE.
TWO HELD AT 5:05 AND ONE AT 9:00 A.M. , THIS ONE, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET ANY INPUT FROM YOUR DISTRICTS AS TO HOW YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO PROCEED? ARE YOU EVEN ASKING THE VOTERS? ARE YOU DOING YOUR DUE DILIGENCE? IT DOESN'T APPEAR THAT WAY AND NOW HONEST TO GOODNESS, I GOT NO PROBLEMS WITH MR. CHESS' SELECTION.
2003 HE'S BEEN AN OFFICER, MOVED UP THROUGH THE RANKS TO COMMANDER. LUCKY FOR HIM, HE HAS A POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT ALLOWS THAT TO HAPPEN. WE DON'T.
WE GOT BEAUTIFUL SERVICEABLE GUYS HERE, WOMEN, THAT PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE EVERY DAY, LIKE THE INDIAN RIVER OFFICER, REST IN PEACE, THAT JUST LOST HER JOB THROUGH -- IT'S JUST -- IT'S UNCONSCIONABLE AND THIS WHOLE THING FEELS ILLEGITIMATE TO ME, THAT YOU THINK THAT THIS IS OKAY, TO MAKE A VOTE TODAY. WE GOT LITTLE BIT MORE THAN 30 DAYS AND YOU'LL HAVE A FULL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DISTRICTS. RIGHT NOW YOU'RE NOT PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK. YOU REALLY JUST AREN'T.
SO I CAUTION YOU ON THIS VOTE, I THINK THAT THE PEOPLE OF CITY OF FORT PIERCE THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA, I'M SURE YOU'VE ALL READ SOME OF THOSE, ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE WAY THIS HAS BEEN RUN. AND I THINK IT'S A HUGE MISTAKE TO TAKE THAT VOTE TODAY.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WHO'S NEXT? WHO'S NEXT? OKAY. WE'LL MOVE ON.
[A. St. Lucie County Regional Resilience Draft Plan and companion Resilience Vulnerability Assessment-Other Hazards Resiliency Strategy Report and Feedback - Sandra Bogan, SLC Resilence Navigator]
>> OKAY. NEXT WE MOVE ON TO THE SAINT LUCIE COUNTY REGIONAL RESILIENT PLAN AND COMPANION RESILIENCY VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT, OTHER HAZARDS, RESILIENCY STRATEGY REPORT AND FEEDBACK.
>> MR. CHESS, DO YOU HAVE A LEAD-IN?
>> NO, MISS BOSEMAN IS GOING TO GIVE US A PRESENTATION, I BELIEVE.
>> WELCOME. YOU CAN -- WHEREVER YOU FEEL
COMFORTABLE. >> PROBABLY WANT TO RUN IT FROM THERE IF YOU WANT OR IF YOU CAN -- I THINK YOU CAN STILL DO IT FROM HERE. I THINK IT WILL WORK.
>> GOOD MORNING, MAYOR. GOOD MORNING, COMMISSIONERS, NICE TO BE HERE TODAY.
[00:10:04]
SOME OF THIS MAY BE A LITTLE BIT FAMILIAR, BECAUSEWE SAW YOU IN APRIL WHERE WE BROUGHT FORTH A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR YOU TO REVIEW AND PROVIDE INPUT. BUT BACK IN 2022, SAINT LUCIE COUNTY RECEIVED A CBDG MITIGATION GRANT TO WORK TOGETHER WITH OUR MUNICIPALITIES TO DEVELOP A DRAFT -- WELL, A FINAL ULTIMATELY AND BRINGING YOUĆ·Ć· TO DRAFT TODAY REGIONAL RESILIENCE PLAN. THE PLAN IS THE -- THE IDEA WAS TO LOOK AT VARIOUS IMPACTS OF NATURAL HAZARDS, LIKE FLOODING AND STORMS. NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, AND DEVELOP STRATEGIES THAT WE CAN TAKE INDIVIDUALLY AS A JURISDICTION OR TOGETHER AS A FULL COMMUNITY TO REDUCE OUR RISKS TO THOSE IMPACTS. SO WE BROUGHT YOU THE FIRST VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT, THE FIRST THING WE DID WAS WE DEVELOPED THESE VERY TECHNICAL 200 SOMETHING PAGE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS, MODELING AND MAPPING POTENTIAL IMPACTS. AND THEN WE BROUGHT YOU THE RESILIENCE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT ON FLOODING.THAT WAS FUNDED BY ACTUALLY A RESILIENT FLORIDA GRANT, WHICH IS -- WAS A NECESSARY ELEMENT FOR US TO BE ABLE TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE GRANTS FROM THE RESILIENT FLORIDA GRANT FOR POTENTIALLY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. AND THEN THE CBDG GRANT FUNDED -- VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT LOOKING AT OTHER HAZARDS AND FUNDED THE DRAFT REGIONAL RESILIENCE PLAN. I DID WANT TO NOTE WITH THE DRAFT PLAN THAT TODAY WE'RE LOOKING FOR INPUT FROM THIS BOARD AND OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS, IF YOU HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO REALLY REVIEW IT AND WANT TO, TO PROVIDE INPUT INTO THE DRAFT PLAN AS WELL AS THE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND WHAT WE WILL DO IS WE'LL INTEGRATE THAT INPUT INTO A FINAL PLAN AND BRING IT BACK TO YOU AT A FUTURE PUBLIC MEETING.
BUT I WANTED TO NOTE THAT THE REGIONAL RESILIENCE PLAN IS VERY BROAD STRATEGIES. IT ESSENTIALLY DOESN'T COMMIT ANY JURISDICTION TO ANY POLICY OR STRATEGY ADAPTATION STRATEGY IN THE FUTURE, BUT INSTEAD JUST SHOWS OUR COMMITMENT TO WORK TOGETHER TOWARD RESILIENCE PLANNING. IN THE FUTURE.
SO WITH THAT, TODAY I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU A PROJECT OVERVIEW.
AGAIN, WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE FINDINGS OF THE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT, AND THE DRAFT REGIONAL RESILIENCE PLAN AND THEN TAKE ANY QUESTIONS FROM YOU. WE DID WORK WITH A GROUP MAYBE THAT YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH, TETRA TECH LLC, THEY HAVE A LOT OF BACKGROUND WHEN IT COMES TO PLANNING, ADAPTATION STRATEGIES, AND THEY ARE GOING TO JOIN US. OUR CONSULTANT WAS ON HER WAY FROM FAR AWAY AND THERE WAS AN ACCIDENT, SO IF YOU SEE -- IF YOU SEE, I'LL HAVE A PARTNER HERE IN A BIT.
BUT RESILIENCE PLANNING IS A PROCESS THAT TAKES A SYSTEMATIC EVIDENCE- BASED APPROACH TO ANALYZED COMMUNITY RISKS AND DEVELOP ADAPTATIONS OR ACTIONS THAT REDUCE THE RISK NOW AND IN THE FUTURE. AND AS I SAID, IT WAS FUNDED BY CBDG MITIGATION GRANT WITH SUPPORT FROM THE RESILIENT FLORIDA PROGRAM, SO WE HAVE BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING SOURCES TO CREATE THIS PROJECT.
IT PROVIDES A ROAD MAP FOR US TO ENHANCE OUR RESILIENCE ACROSS THE COUNTY, INCLUDING OUR MUNICIPALITIES.
IDENTIFIES ADAPTATION STRATEGIES, THAT REDUCE CURRENT AND FUTURE RISK AND MAINTAIN SAFETY, HEALTH AND OUR ECONOMIC STABILITY.
SO, THOSE ARE SUPER IMPORTANT AS WE MOVE FORWARD.
AND IT EMPHASIZES COLLABORATION, POLICY INTEGRATION BETWEEN JURISDICTIONS AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT.
WE'RE KIND OF UNIQUE IN SAINT LUCIE COUNTY. THERE IS MY PARTNER I JUST MENTIONED. THIS IS ERIN DATY, PART OF THE TETRA TECH TEAM.
>> THANK YOU. I APOLOGIZE, TRAFFIC.
>> SHE HAD QUITE A DRIVE THIS MORNING.
BUT SAINT LUCIE IS KIND OF UNIQUE IN ITS APPROACH TO RESILIENCE PLANNING. I THINK THAT WE WERE THE FIRST COUNTY IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO DO A COMMUNITY WIDE RESILIENCE PLAN, MEANING THAT WE BROUGHT ALL OF OUR MUNICIPALITIES TOGETHER. THERE ARE SOME COUNTIES THAT HAD ONE OR TWO OF THEIR MUNICIPALITIES, WE'RE THE FIRST ONE TO ACTUALLY WORK FROM A
[00:15:04]
COMMUNITY WIDE PERSPECTIVE AND THERE IS A LOT OF ADVANTAGES TO THAT.INCLUDING FROM THE VERY BEGINNING WE PUT TOGETHER A STEERING COMMITTEE, A RESILIENCE STEERING COMMITTEE.
IT WAS ACTUALLY ALREADY IN PLACE FROM THE PREVIOUS PROJECT WE HAVE BEEN DOING.
THAT STEERING COMMITTEE WAS MADE UP OF CITY OF FORT PIERCE, PORT ST. LUCIE, STAFF FROM DIVERSE DEPARTMENTS, AS WELL AS REGIONAL AGENCIES, LIKE THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION, THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL SO REALLY GREAT BACKGROUND AND SUBJECT AREA EXPERTS FROM PUBLIC WORKS TO PLANNING TO, YOU KNOW, ENVIRONMENTAL.
WE DID A TON OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH.
IN FACT, OVER THE FOUR YEARS SINCE WE GOT THE CDBG GRANT, IT WAS KIND OF AN ITERATIVE PROCESS, WE DIDN'T GET THE RESILIENT FLORIDA GRANT UNTIL THE NEXT YEAR AND WE GOT ANOTHER ONE. SO, IT ACTUALLY STARTED IN 2022, BUT TOOK SOME TIME TO COBBLE TOGETHER ALL THOSE GRANTS, BUT WE HAD CLOSE TO 50 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SESSIONS SINCE 2022. AND, AGAIN, THEIR PROJECT OBJECTIVES WAS TO COMBINE THAT REGIONAL COLLABORATION SCIENCE- BASED ASSESSMENTS AND INCLUSIVE ENGAGEMENT NEEDING TO REALLY HEAR FROM OUR COMMUNITY'S PERSPECTIVE. AND LIKE I SAID, IT CREATES A ROAD MAP AND WE ARE IN THE FINAL STRETCH.
AND IT HAS BEEN A LONG JOURNEY FOR US.
SO, WE'RE SO HAPPY TO BE HERE. AND I JUST REALLY WANT TO HIGHLIGHT THE LEVEL OF COLLABORATION THAT WE DID HAVE BECAUSE THE FIRST PART OF UNDERTAKING THIS PROJECT, IN ORDER TO DO THE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS WAS TO GET OUR GIS TEAMS, AGAIN, FROM FORT PIERCE, PORT ST. LUCIE, ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, TO BRING TOGETHER A LOT OF LOCAL DATA AND REGIONAL DATA AND BEYOND THAT THERE IS DATA FROM THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OR OTHER AGENCY, USGS, ARMY CORPS, SO THAT WAS A GOOD SIX MONTHS IN THE MAKING JUST GETTING THAT DATA TOGETHER AND MAKING SURE THAT , YOU KNOW, MAKING SURE IT WAS CLEANED UP SO THERE WERE NO DUPLICATES. IT WAS ALL SPEAKING THE SAME LANGUAGE, WHICH IS IT GIS LANGUAGE, WHICH I DON'T SPEAK.
BUT AND THEN ALSO IDENTIFYING CRITICAL ASSETS.
SO, I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO GO A LITTLE BIT DEEPER, I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO ERIN, BUT, EVEN LOOKING AT WHAT OUR CRITICAL ASSETS ARE BECAUSE THAT'S PRIMARILY WHAT WE LOOKED AT WITH THE RVAOH RESILIENCE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OTHER HAZARDS, WE DID LOOK AT BOTH -- THREE THINGS, ASSETS, LAND, WHERE THAT IMPACT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN GEOGRAPHICALLY AS WELL AS WHERE THE POPULATIONS WERE, INCLUDING LOW TO MODERATE INCOME POPULATIONS.
WE WERE VERY FOCUSED ON THAT. YEAH.
AND SO I ALREADY TALKED ABOUT MOST OF THAT.
THIS AND THE REGIONAL DRAFT PLAN WE ALSO INCLUDE PRIORITIZATION -- WE LOOKED AT ADAPTATION STRATEGIES, REVIEWED POLICIES, AND THEN IDENTIFIED PRIORITIZATION METHODOLOGY, SO AS WE MOVE FORWARD, WE CAN USE A METHODOLOGY TO HOW ARE WE GOING TO PRIORITIZE OUR PROJECTS, RIGHT? AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND WITH ANY GOOD PLAN, IT IS A LIVING DOCUMENT, AND SO YOU NEED ALSO TO KEEP IN MIND THAT YOU WANT TO TRACK WHAT IS SUCCESSFUL, WHAT IS SUCCESSFUL AND WHAT'S NOT SUCCESSFUL.
SOME OF, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE ADAPTATIONS ARE VERY INNOVATIVE, IF YOU WILL, AND SO, LIKE, TRACKING AND MAKING SURE THE OUTCOME IS WHAT WE WERE HOPING TO GET IS IMPORTANT. NOW, I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO ERIN DATY.
>> SURE. SO, BECAUSE THIS WAS FUNDED BY TWO DIFFERENT GRANTS, THE REALLY FOCUSED US ON FLOODING, DIFFERENT TYPES OF FLOOD RISK.
THAT'S WHAT THEIR MAIN GOAL OF THEIR PROGRAM IS.
BUT WE ALSO NOT ONLY LOOKED AT COASTAL AND TIDAL FLOODING, HURRICANE, STORM SURGE, THAT TYPE OF THING, WE LOOKED AT INLAND FLOODING, RAINFALL AND WE RAN CERTAIN MODELS TO LOOK AT DIFFERENT LOWER AREAS OF THE REGION AND WHERE WE WOULD SEE RAINFALL INDUCED FLOODING, BOTH CURRENTLY AND WITH FUTURE CONDITIONS, WHICH IS INTERESTING.
WE PULLED DATA FROM THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT TO TELL US WHAT THE RAINFALL EVENTS WERE GOING TO LOOK LIKE IN THE FUTURE. WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT RAINFALL IS THAT THE EXTREMES ARE BECOMING MORE EXTREME.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE PERIODS WHERE WE GOT LOW RAINFALL AND WE GOT PERIODS WHERE WE GOT HIGHER VOLUME RAINFALL EVENTS. IF ANYBODY REMEMBERS THREE YEARS
[00:20:02]
AGO WHEN WE HAD A 1 IN 1,000 RAINFALL EVENT THAT SHUT DOWN FORT LAUDERDALE AIRPORT FOR THREE DAYS.SO THEY'RE NOT SO FAR FETCHED. WE LOOKED AT EXTREME HEAT.
WE LOOKED AT PERIODS OF DROUGHT LIKE I MENTIONED, THE FEAST OR FAMINE SCENARIO. WE LOOKED AT SEVERE STORMS THAT WERE MODIFIED AND EXACERBATED BY TIDAL FLOODING IMPACTS LIKE, YOU KNOW, A LATE SEASON OFF SHORE HURRICANE EVENT IN OCTOBER, A KING TIDE, AND THEN 100 YEAR RAINFALL EVENT ON TOP OF IT. SO THOSE TYPES OF COMPOUND AND SEVERE STORMS , WE LOOKED AT THOSE IMPACTS.
HIGH WIND EVENTS, WE LOOKED AT WILDFIRE AND COASTAL EROSION, WHAT ARE THE IMPACTS OF THE TIDAL FLOODING AND THE STORM SURGE ON OUR SHORELINES.
>> SO THIS REALLY FOCUSES ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS. THE STATE AS MENTIONED FUNDED THE FLOOD PORTION OF IT. WE WERE REQUIRED TO LOOK AT 2040, 2070, BUT THOSE TWO PLANNING HORIZONS, BUT WE ALSO LIKE TO LOOK AT THE 2100 SCENARIO AS WELL BECAUSE CERTAIN INFRASTRUCTURE DECISIONS YOU MAKE COULD BE FURTHER OUT THAN JUST 2040 OR 2070. AND THEN WE LOOKED AT, YOU KNOW, MODELING SCENARIOS AND BROUGHT THE GIS TOGETHER AND PUT TOGETHER A MAP SERIES. OTHER HAZARDS WAS THE FEDERALLY PORTIONED PART OF THE PROJECT, WHERE WE LOOKED AT ALL OF THOSE OTHER TYPES OF HAZARDS.
THIS LOOKS MORE -- A LOT LIKE WHAT A COUNTY LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY IS, IF YOU HEARD THAT.
EVERYBODY PARTICIPATES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY, EVERY FIVE YEARS AND THAT LOOKS AT A WHOLE LOT OF HAZARDS, NOT JUST FLOODING.
AND INTERESTINGLY WE ALSO USED, YOU SEE THE ACRONYM THERE, SLAM, THAT STANDS FOR SEA LEVEL ASSISTED MARSH MODEL. AND WHAT THAT DOES IS LOOKS AT THE IMPACTS OF HABITAT TRANSITION DUE TO SEA LEVEL RISE OVER TIME.
AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE FRESH WATER WETLANDS THAT BECOME MORE TIDALLY INFLUENCED OR BRACKISH OR THAT HABITAT CAN CHANGE JUST TO STUFF THAT IS MOREMORE TOLERANT. YOU'LL SEE A DIFFERENCE IN THE PLANTS AND SPECIES THAT ARE DEPENDENT ON THOSE HABITATS.
NEXT SLIDE. SO, WE'LL KIND OF WALK THROUGH THE SERIES. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE TO EVALUATE ARE THE ACTUAL DAYS OF TIDAL FLOODING UNDER VARIOUS SCENARIOS.
THIS IS THE HISTORIC CONDITION 2005 TO 2023 AND THEN THE COLOR RAMPĆ·Ć·RAMP THE RIGHT SIDE SHOWS YOU THE ACTUAL DAYS THAT WE'RE GOING TO SEE VARIOUS TYPES OF FLOODING. THIS IS THE MEAN HIGH HIGH WATER WITH THE TWO- FOOT SEA LEVEL RISE. WANT TO CLICK THROUGH?
>> BECAUSE IT IS MAYBE A LITTLE SMALL, POTENTIALLY, WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT IS WHERE YOU SEE SORT OF THE LAVENDER, THE PURPLE, THAT'S ABOUT ONE DAY OF TIDAL FLOODING. AS YOU GET INTO MORE GREEN COLORS, YOU'RE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 21 AND 41 DAYS.
AND THEN ORANGE AND RED IS 100 OR 150 OR MORE.
SO THIS IS PRESENT DAY AND THEN THIS IS 2040.
YOU CAN SEE MORE RED, ESPECIALLY OVER BY THE BARRIER ISLANDS. AND NOW YOU'RE SEEING MORE RED IN ST. LUCIE VILLAGE, SAY, AS WELL.
OKAY. >> MOST OF THAT SEEMS TO BE FOCUSED ON NORTH BEACH. NOW I SEE SOUTH BEACH,
I'M SORRY. IF YOU SEE THAT LITTLE MAP IN THE BOTTOM RIGHT, SO WE DID THE -- WE DID A QUADRANT THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE COUNTY. SO IT IS SHOWING YOU WHERE WE'RE -- WE'RE JUST GIVING YOU A SNIPPET, SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE CLOSER.
SO, YEAH, THAT'S THE NORTHERN -- BUT YOU'RE GOING TO SEE OTHER PARTS OF THAT MAP AS WE GO.
>> THIS IS LOOKING AT THE CATEGORY 1 AND THE CATEGORYCATEGORY STORM EVENTS.
AND WHERE THEY OCCUR. WE GOT THE PORTION OF THE COUNTY THAT IS THE FORT PIERCE AREA AND THEN THE PORT ST. LUCIE AREA. THIS IS COUNTY WIDE.
SO IT IS A LITTLE HARDER TO SEE THOSE IMPACT TRANSITIONS OVER TIME. BUT THIS IS 2070 AND, AGAIN, THE COLORS THERE INDICATE WHERE YOU HAVE BLUE OR LIGHT BLUE, LESSER LEVELS OF FLOOD INUNDATION.
THIS IS A 100- YEAR, 24- HOUR RAINFALL EVENT, CONSIDERING ALSO THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION INTERMEDIATE HIGH SEA LEVEL RISE PROJECTON. THAT WAS A MOUTHFUL.
AND THEN WE LOOK AT JUST WHAT THE RAINFALLRAINFALL IMPACTS OVER TIME ARE.
WE PICK ONE EVENT, THIS IS PRESENT DAY, WHEN WE HAVE A
[00:25:01]
100- YEAR, 24- HOUR RAINFALL EVENT.AGAIN, IN THE UPPER RIGHT YOU CAN SEE THE LOCATION WHERE IN THE REGION WE ARE, WITH THAT MAP, NUMBER 21.
THIS IS PRESENT DAY AND THE COLOR RAMP WILL INDICATE, YOU KNOW, 2040 AND THEN 2070, WHERE THOSE RAINFALL EVENTS OCCUR.
COMPOUND FLOODING IS THE EXAMPLE I THROUGH OUT EARLIER, YOU HAVE, LIKE, AN OCTOBER RAINFALL EVENT.
YOU GOT A KING TIDE SCENARIO, WHERE THE TIDES ARE UP AND THEN YOU HAVE A CAT 3 STORM EVENT. AND THOSE EVENTS CAN HAPPEN.
I KNOW THAT IN THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS, THIS WAS A RELATIVELY LESSER PAINFUL KING TIDE SEASON THAN WE HAVE SEEN IN THE PAST. BUT SOMETIMES WE HAVE SEEN THOSE KING TIDES OCCUR WHEN WE HAVE A LATE SEASON STORM.
AND THIS IS ABSOLUTELY THE TYPE OF SCENARIO THAT YOU TAKE ALL OF THOSE EVENTS, AND YOU KIND OF MASH THEM UP AND LOOK AT WHAT THE IMPACTS CAN BE. AND HOW FAR INLAND THEY ARE AND HOW THE ELEVATIONS OF WATER ON THE LAND ARE IMPACTED BY THOSE EVENTS KIND OF COMBINING TOGETHER. SO THIS IS PRESENT DAY.
YOU SEE MORE OF THE YELLOWS AND ORANGES BECOMING MORE RED.
YOU SEE MORE OF THE BLUE FURTHER INLAND.
>> AND I JUST WANTED TO NOTE HERE TOO THAT IS WE OFTEN THINK OF STORM SURGE AS A COASTAL ISSUE. BUT IF YOU NOTICE HERE, WITH THE ST. LUCIE RIVER, OUR RIVER IS CONNECTED TO OUR OCEAN, SO THIS IS GOING TO SHOW FLOODING INLAND FROM EVEN STORM SURGE.
>> WE ALSO LOOKED AT DROUGHT. WE LOOKED AT A PERIOD OF RECORD DATA FROM THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND OTHER NATIONAL DATA SOURCES. ST. LUCIE COUNTY IS EXPERIENCING AN AVERAGE OF 9 TO 10 WEEKS OF DROUGHT ANNUALLY BASED ON THAT PERIOD OF RECORD OVER THE LAST 22 -- APPROXIMATELY 22 YEARS.
AND THEN YOU'VE GOT AN EXAMPLE THERE OF POINT LOCATION WHERE IT SHOWS APRIL TO MAY RAINFALL.
EXTREME HEAT IS AN ANALYSIS THAT WE ALSO DID.
AND WHAT THAT HELPS INDICATE, FOR INSTANCE, IT WOULD LEAD TO A STRATEGY WHERE MAYBE A COOLING CENTER OR WHERE YOU MIGHT MODIFY FACILITIES TO DEAL WITH PEOPLE LIKE OLDER PEOPLE OR YOUNGER PEOPLE THAT NEED RELIEF FROM THE HEAT DURING CERTAIN TIMES OF THE YEAR.
GENERALLY HEAT ANALYSIS ALIGNS WHERE YOU HAVE MORE IMPERVIOUS AREA AND LESSER TREES AND THEN THAT'S WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO SEE MORE OF THE HEAT. WE ALSO DID A TREE CANOPY STUDY FOR THIS, WHICH HELPS IDENTIFY GAPS WHERE YOU HAVE SHADE AND LESS TREES TO HELP WITH TREE PLANTING PRIORITIES AND PROGRAMS THAT CAN HELP COMBAT THAT EXTREME HEAT THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. WE ALSO LOOKED AT WILDFIRE. IT IS NOT AS HUGE OF ONE OF THE RISKS THAT WE LOOKED AT COMPARED TO OTHER AREAS WITHIN THE REGION FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE BECAUSE YOU'RE MORE URBANIZED.
WE DID LOOK AT WILDFIRE BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE SEEN OUT WEST IN THE UNITED STATES, URBAN AREAS CAN BE IMPACTED BY WILDFIRE RISK.
>> AGAIN, SOME OF THE ADAPTATIONS ARE CREATING THOSE BARRIERS THAT YOU WOULD IN A WILDFIRE, RIGHT. THERE ARE WAYS TO PREEMPT THE IMPACTS FROM A WILDFIRE BY HAVING, LIKE, A NOTIFICATION AS WELL AS A BOUNDARY.
>> EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS. SO NOW WE'RE GETTING INTO THE ACTUAL PLAN ITSELF. THE WHOLE GOAL IS TO REALLY MARRY THE SCIENCE OF ALL OF THESE HAZARD IMPACTS WITH STRATEGIES THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CAN IMPLEMENT AND POLICIES THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CAN ADOPT TO HELP MITIGATE OR REDUCE THE RISK OF THOSE HAZARDS OVER TIME. WE ALSO INCLUDED A CAPACITY ASSESSMENT. A CAPACITY ASSESSMENT LOOKS AT YOUR EXISTING PROCEDURES LIKE FINANCIAL PROCEDURES, STAFFING PROCEDURES, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, AND LOOKS TO WHERE WE CAN MAKE IMPROVEMENTS FOR CAPACITY. A LOT OF THAT GENERALLY COMES DOWN TO RECOMMENDATIONS DETECTION.
BUT WE DID LOOK AT A CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND WE CONDUCTED AND ARE FINISHING A LL TALK ABOUT I SLIDES.
SO, ONE THING THAT THE STEERING COMMITTEE ACTUALLY HELPED US DO, WHICH WAS REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT, WAS TAKING THE OUTCOMES OF THE DATA AND FIGURING OUT WHAT STRATEGIES WE
[00:30:04]
WOULD UTILIZE TO CURB THOSE POTENTIAL IMPACTS GOING INTO THE FUTURE.THESE ARE THE MAJOR CATEGORIES OF THOSE STRATEGIES.
AND WE'LL KIND OF WALK THROUGH THEM AND PROVIDE SOME EXAMPLES OF WHAT THOSE STRATEGIES ARE.
BUT GRAY INFRASTRUCTURE, YOU'RE LOOKING AT ACTUAL PHYSICAL MODIFICATIONS TO INFRASTRUCTURE LINES, PUMPS, THOSE TYPES OF -- BUILDINGS, THOSE TYPES OF THINGS.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, WHERE YOU'RE LOOKING AT PARKS, CONSERVATION LAND, SHORELINES, THOSE COMPONENTS OF YOUR COMMUNITY.
THERE IS A VERY HEAVY FOCUS ON COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND I CAN TELL YOU I WORK ON A LOT OF VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS ACROSS THE STATE AND NONE OF THEM HAVE HAD AS MUCH MUCH INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY EDUCATION AS WE HAVE HAD ON THIS ONE.
AND SO THERE ARE CONTINUED RECOMMENDATIONS ABOUT HOW TO HARMONIZE ACROSS PROGRAMS, BUT ALSO GET THE WORD OUT TO THE COMMUNITY. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING, A LOT OF THAT FOCUSES ON USING THE DATA TO BETTER PLAN FOR EVENTS AND HOW TO RECOVER FROM THEM UNDER YOUR TRADITIONAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES.
AND THEN WE LOOKED AT YOUR CODES AND YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLANS. AND SO THERE IS A PHASING TO THIS. BECAUSE YOU CAN'T CLIMB THE MOUNTAIN IN ONE DAY. WE LOOKED AT SHORT- TERM AND INTERMEDIATE AND LONG- TERM STRATEGIES, BUT NOTHING SHOULD BE PUT INTO A SILO, FOR INSTANCE. IF THERE IS A GRANT OPPORTUNITY THAT OPENS UP, AND IT IS A STRATEGY THAT MAY BE FURTHER OUT, AND IF IT IS YOUR GRANT APPLICATION, THAT MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO MOVE UP IN THE MIX AND PURSUE.
BUT GENERALLY, JUST TO HELP PEOPLE START WITH BUDGETING AND THAT TYPE OF THING, LOOKING AT GROUND TROOPING THE STRATEGIES IN SOME WAY. SO, NOW WE'RE GOING TO KIND SOME OF THE EXAMPLES.
FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE IS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD WHERE YOU WOULD BE LOOKING AT RETRO FITTING, IT MAY INCLUDE ELEVATION OR EVEN RELOCATION OF COMPONENTS OF YOUR PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE. BUT GENERALLY WE'RE ACCOUNTING FOR FLOOD RISK, WE'RE ACCOUNTING FOR HEATING, COOLING, MAKING BUILDINGS MORE EFFICIENT, AND LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW, FUTURE CONSTRUCTION WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT A NEW BUILDING OR NEW FACILITY, ACCOUNTING FOR THE FLOOD RISK IN THE DESIGN AND LOCATION OF THAT FACILITY. THIS COULD ALSO INCLUDE THINGS LIKE CONSIDERING LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR YOUR ROADS, AND IN TERMS OF, LIKE, ELEVATION OF YOUR ROADS AND FLOOD RISK. NOT JUST HOW MANY CARS, CAPACITY, BUT LOOKING AT ROAD DESIGN IN A DIFFERENT WAY, BASICALLY INCORPORATING THE OUTCOMES AND THE DATA WE LEARNED IN THIS VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT.
ECOSYSTEMS, NATURE-BASED. THIS WAS A LOT OF SHORELINE ANALYSIS. WE ALSO LOOKED AT PARKS, LANDS, CONSERVATION LANDS, USE OF GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, NOT JUST ALWAYS PUMPS AND PIPES, BUT ARE THERE WAYS THAT WE CAN INCORPORATE MORE LAND MANAGEMENT INTO OUR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND POLICY, I'VE GOT A SLIDE WHERE I WILL TALK ABOUT THAT A LITTLE BIT LATER. BUT WE TOOK A BROAD BRUSH AND LOOKED AT EVERY ELEMENT OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, A LOT OF TIMES WHEN PEOPLE DO THIS THEY ONLY FOCUS ON THE COASTAL ELEMENT. THIS IS NOT JUST A COASTAL ISSUE. THIS IMPACTS AS WE KIND OF TALKED ABOUT HERE YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE, YOUR PARKS LANDS, YOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT YOU ADOPTED FOR DIFFERENT FACILITIES AND IMPACTS.
THE ACCOUNT FOR THE FUTURE MANAGEMENT OF THOSE FACILITIES, SO, THAT'S WHY WE LOOK AT EVERY ELEMENT OF THE COMP PLAN AND FINISHING UP THAT ANALYSIS PRESENTLY. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, HOW DOES -- HOW DO THE CITIES, THE MUNICIPALITIES COORDINATE WITH THE COUNTY ON EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS, YOUR OWN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING, YOUR PARTICIPATION WITHIN THE COMMUNITY, THE NFIP COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM. A LOT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS PARTICIPATE IN THAT PROGRAM, BUT THERE ARE STRATEGIES THAT YOU CAN BETTER PARTICIPATE IN THAT PROGRAM, BUT YOU'RE ALSO, FOR INSTANCE, WITH YOUR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GETTING THE WORD OUT BECAUSE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IS A HUGE COMPONENT OF THE COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM, HOW THEY ALLOCATE THE POINTS IN THAT PROGRAM AS WELL. BUT EARLY WARNING IS SOMETHING THAT WE TALKED ABOUT NOT JUST WITH FLOODS, BUT ALSO WITH HEAT DAYS, AND DROUGHT. THINGS THAT WE CAN DO WHERE WE'RE LOOKING BEFORE A PROBLEM OCCURS RATHER THAN SCRAMBLING WHEN THE PROBLEM STARTS TO EXIST. COMMUNITY EDUCATION.
WE HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS IS NOT STOPPING WITH THIS PROJECT, THAT THERE IS GAGEMENT AND
[00:35:05]
WAYS YOU CAN GET WORD OUT TO THE COMMUNITY.ONE WAY IS THROUGH PARTICIPATION WITH THE NFIP PROGRAM. WE HAVE THE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT WORKING WITH OTHER AGENCIES, FDOT, THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, BUT REALLY LEVERAGING PARTNERSHIPS AND CONTINUING THOSE PARTNERSHIPS BECAUSE YOU DO HAVE A STRONG STRUCTURE ALREADY FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH WITH THIS PROGRAM.
THE CAPACITY ASSESSMENT THAT I TALKED ABOUT, THE BOTTOM LINE ON THE CAPACITY ASSESSMENT WAS THAT THERE WAS A STRONG CAPACITY THROUGHOUT THE REGION DEALING WITH FLOODS. YOU KNOW, YOU GUYS TALK A LOT, YOU'VE BEEN HIT BY HURRICANES BEFORE, DIRECTLY, RAINFALL EVENTS, SO THERE IS A GOOD INFRASTRUCTURE IN TERMS OF HANDLING THOSE EVENTS, PREDICTING THEM, RESPONDING TO THEM, BUT IT WAS MODERATE FOR THINGS LIKE COASTAL EROSION, DROUGHT, HEAT, WILDFIRE, WHICH KIND OF EMPHASIZES THAT YOU CAN'T JUST LOOK AT THESE VULNERABILITY PROJECTS, SILOED AND LOOKING JUST AT FLOODING. THOSE OTHER HAZARDS ARE REALLY IMPORTANT TOO AND THEY HAVE EXACERBATED IMPACTS ON THE NEEDIER SECTORS OF YOUR COMMUNITY.
SO, BUILDING SOME OF THAT CAPACITY ARE INCLUDED IN SOME OF OUR RECOMMENDATIONS AS WELL.
POLICY STRATEGIES. WE HAVE DONE THE POLICY REVIEW ON TWO LEVELS. THE FIRST LEVEL IS WE CREATED A UNIFORM SET OF EXAMPLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES. I KNOW YOU GUYS ARE IN THE MIDST OF UPDATING YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RIGHT NOW. SO THE TIMING ON THIS WAS REALLY GOOD THAT WE COULD PROVIDE SOME OF THOSE EXAMPLE POLICIES.
THE WAY IT IS STRUCTURED, IT IS ONE GOAL, FOUR OBJECTIVES AND 60 EXAMPLE POLICIES ACROSS ALL OF THOSE THEMES THAT WE TALKED ABOUT WITH THE GRAY INFRASTRUCTURE, THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT, DATA.
ON SOME LEVEL, ALL OF THE ADAPTATION RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE MADE ARE ADDRESSED IN A POLICY RECOMMENDATION. OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE YOUR OWN COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS.
SO THIS IS NOT US TELLING YOU, YOU MUST ADOPT THESE POLICIES. THIS IS A MENU OF THINGS THAT YOU CAN PICK AND CHOOSE FROM, WHILE YOU ARE ENGAGED IN YOUR CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. THE SECOND THING THAT WE DID IS WE ALSO ARE COMPLETING AN ANALYSIS RIGHT NOW OF YOUR COMP -- YOUR EXISTING COMP PLAN AND YOUR CODE ABOUT WHERE YOU CAN INCORPORATE MORE OF THESE STRATEGIES. SO WE PROVIDED MODEL POLICIES, BUT WE'RE ALSO LOOKING AT THINGS WHERE THERE MAY BE A CONFLICT, OR THERE MAY BE A POLICY THAT YOU HAVE THAT PREVENTS IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ADAPTATION STRATEGY. THAT'S IMPORTANT TO KNOW AS WELL. AND SO WE'RE FINISHING UP THOSE JURISDICTIONS, SPECIFIC POLICY ANALYSES, FOR EACH JURISDICTION THAT IS PARTICIPATING, WE'RE HOPING TO FINISH THAT UP BY THE END OF THIS YEAR.
IT IS A LOT OF COMP PLAN AND CODE TO LOOK THROUGH FOR EVERYBODY. BUT WE'RE -- THAT IS OUR GOAL.
SO, THE POLICY ANALYSIS OF THIS IS PRETTY SPECIFIC.
AND IT IS TO EACH JURISDICTION. IT IS NOT JUST A BLANKET OF -- THIS IS WHAT WE WANT YOU TO DO WITH THE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES. BUT IT IS SPECIFIC TO THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. SO WE THINK THAT WILL BE A VERY USEFUL TOOL FOR YOU.
>> THAT'S GOING TO BE OFFERED SEPARATELY FROM THE DRAFT, THE DRAFT RESILIENCE PLAN WILL HAVE THE UNIFORM POLICIES WITHIN IT.
THE INDIVIDUAL REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED TO EACH JURISDICTION IN A MEMO FORM.
>> RIGHT. AND THAT IS WRAPPING IT UP.
THAT'S A LOT. BUT THE REGIONAL RESILIENCE PLAN, I THINK, CAN BE VIEWED AS A TOOL FOR YOU.
IT IS NOT A MANDATE. IT DOESN'T REQUIRE, YOU KNOW, A PORTIONING BUDGETARY FUNDS. THERE ARE SUGGESTIONS ON ADAPTATION STRATEGIES YOU CAN IMPLEMENT OVER TIME.
EXAMPLES OF POLICIES THAT YOU CAN IMPLEMENT OVER TIME.
BUT TRULY, YOU KNOW, THROUGHOUT THE REGION IT GETS EVERYBODY KIND OF ROWING IN THE SAME DIRECTION IN TERMS OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE RISKS ARE, WHAT ARE THE CRITICAL ASSETS TO PROTECT AND WHEN, WHAT ARE THE TIME FRAMES THAT YOU WOULD EXPECT THOSE IMPACTS TO OCCUR.
AND WHAT YOU CAN POTENTIALLY DO ABOUT IT.
HOPEFULLY IT IS A TOOL THAT YOU ALL CAN UTILIZE WITH YOUR BUDGET DECISIONS AND WITH YOUR POLICY DECISIONS.
>> SO YOU'RE REFERRING TO A REGIONAL RESILIENCE PLAN, BUT IT SEEMS TO ME THIS REPRESENTS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, NOT TREASURE COAST OR -- IS THAT CORRECT?
YOU SAY REGIONAL, BUT YOU DON'T SAY --
>> YOU ARE CORRECT. REGIONAL AT THE COUNTY LEVEL, NOT REGIONAL AS IN THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING
[00:40:01]
COUNCIL.>> OKAY. I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT I KNEW. ADD, HOWEVER, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING CLOSELY, WE'RE TRYING TO FOSTER A MORE REGIONAL AS IN TREASURE COAST REGION RESILIENCE PLANNING COLLABORATION, SHARING OF IDEAS, SHARING OF SUCCESSES OR FAILURES EVEN. I KNOW THAT, LIKE, I, YOU KNOW, PERSONALLY WORKED WITH THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL ON TRYING TO GET A GRANT TO SORT OF FUND A POSITION THAT WOULD ACTUALLY HANDLE THAT. WE WEREN'T SUCCESSFUL.
BUT I KNOW IT IS A PRIORITY OF THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AS WELL.
>> AND SO YOU PROBABLY AREN'T ABLE TO DO THIS, BUT I WOULD THINK THAT ONE THING THAT PLAYS INTO PLANNING BASED ON THIS IS WE HAVE A STATE LEGISLATURE WHICH IS NOT EXACTLY LOOKING TO US TO HAVE LESS DENSITY OR -- AND ALSO THERE IS A BILL OUT THERE THAT SAYS IN YOUR COMP PLAN YOU CAN'T HAVE ANYTHING MORE RESTRICTIVE -- THERE ARE THINGS THAT PLAY AT THE STATE LEVEL THAT MAKE THIS KIND OF AN ACADEMIC EXERCISE UNTIL WE'RE ALLOWED TO DO
IT. >> I FORGOT TO INTRODUCE ERIN AS A LEGAL MIND AS WELL. SO, SHE'S A LAWYER, AND SHE IS AN URBAN PLANNER AND, OF COURSE, THAT PARTICULAR LEGISLATION WAS ON OUR MINDS WHEN IT CAME ABOUT.
>> AND I THINK THAT RAISES A REALLY GOOD POINT, BECAUSE SENATE BILL 180 IS REALLY FOCUSED ON IMPACTS RELATED TO THAT MORE RESTRICTIVE OR BURDENSOME LANGUAGE RELATED TO PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT.
A LOT OF OUR RECOMMENDATIONS ARE NOT ABOUT PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT.
IT IS ABOUT HOW THE CITY OR COUNTY, WHOEVER IT IS, CAN DO A BETTER JOB OF PUTTING ITS HOUSE IN ORDER IN TERMS OF ITS FACILITIES, ITS BUILDINGS, ITS INFRASTRUCTURE, ITS DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PUMPS AND DIFFERENT FLOOD EVENTS.
THERE IS A SECTION IN THERE ABOUT ENCOURAGING AND KNOWING, LIKE, WHAT'S HAPPENING FROM A PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT STANDPOINT, BUT WE'RE MINDFUL OF THAT LEGISLATION.
WE'RE ALSO HOPEFUL THAT THE LEGISLATURE ROLLS THAT BACK THIS YEAR.
>> SUPPOSED TO BE A GLITCH BILL, RIGHT? WE'LL SEE WHAT THAT SOLVES.
>> EXACTLY. BUT, WE KNEW THAT KIND OF GOING INTO THIS. SO WE WANTED TO MAKE CLEAR TO PEOPLE THAT THERE IS A LOT THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENT CAN DO OUTSIDE OF THAT LEGISLATION SHOULD IT NOT BE MODIFIED. BUT WE'RE ALL HOPEFUL.
COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS? COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS?
>> COMMENT. IN MY DAY JOB WE OPERATE EXTENSIVE PORTFOLIO OF REAL ESTATE.
AND WE HAVE SPENT THE LAST FIVE YEARS HARDENING PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT OUR PORTFOLIO IN MARTIN COUNTY AND ST. LUCIE COUNTY. THE COST FACTOR OF THIS STUFF IS MASSIVELY PROHIBITIVE, ESPECIALLY TO A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY SUCH AS THIS, THAT HAS A $67 MILLION ANNUAL BUDGET THAT WE ARE ATTEMPTING TO PUT THAT BUDGET TOGETHER BY LOOKING FOR NICKELS AND DIMES UNDER THE CARPET. SO, TO COME UP TO A BUILDING SUCH AS THIS, WE CAN SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THIS BUILDING, SUNRISE THEATRE, MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. YOU PICK ANY BUILDING IN THE PORTFOLIO AT THE CITY OWNS, THE COST FACTOR IS -- PREVENTS US FROM UNDERTAKING A PROJECT SUCH AS THAT. THERE HAVE BEEN PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN UNDERTAKEN TO RESPOND TO STORMS, SUCH AS HARDENING OUR FUEL DEPO, THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ET CETERA, BUT MY THEORY HAS BEEN IF WE CAN PREVENT THE DAMAGE TO BEGIN WITH, WE DON'T HAVE TO CLEAN UP THE MESS AFTERWARDS OR DO THE REPAIRS AFTERWARDS, WHICH INCLUDES INSURANCE CLAIMS AND BUILDING PERMITS AND CONSTRUCTION TIME, ET CETERA.
WE HAVE GONE THE OPPOSITE ROAD AND SPENT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN HARDENING BUILDINGS THAT PROBABLY AREN'T WORTH THE INVESTMENT. I'M NOT SURE HOW WE RECONCILE THAT TO THE TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE TO SAY WE'RE GOING TO IN ESSENCE SPECIAL ASSESS YOU, BY RAISING TAXES, TO HARDEN PROPERTIES ON A WHAT IF SCENARIO, WHEN CITIZENS OF THE CITY ARE BEGGING FOR MORE POLICE PROTECTION, PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES, MORE OF EVERYTHING AND THEN WE HAVE THE STATE GOVERNMENT SAYING, GUESS WHAT, WE'RE GOING TO TAKE AWAY YOUR -- TAX PAYS. I RESPECT YOUR REPORT.
THIS IS THE BUSINESS I'M IN, PROTECTING REAL ESTATE.
HOWEVER, THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS CANDIDLY FROM A MUNICIPALITY OF OUR SIZE IS IMPOSSIBLE.
THE COUNTY HAS A BUDGET THAT IS, WHAT, 10, 15 TIMES OURS.
THEY MAY HAVE AVAILABLE FUNDING TO TAKE SOMETHING OF THIS NATURE ON A LIMITED BASIS, BUT CITY SUCH AS FORT PIERCE, I GOT A SEAWALL THAT NEEDS RECONSTRUCTION RIGHT DOWN THE STREET FROM HERE THAT WE'RE PUTTING ON SOME FIVE- YEAR
[00:45:01]
CAPEX IMPROVEMENT PLAN BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THE FUNDING NOW TO DO IT. SO I'M NOT REALLY SURE -- I RESPECT THE REPORT AND THE CONCLUDINGS OF THE REPORT, BUT WHAT IT DOESN'T TOUCH ON IS HOW DO YOU IMPLEMENT THIS IN AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE THERE IS NO FUNDS AVAILABLE?>> UNDERSTOOD. CLIMBING THE MOUNTAIN, YOU GOT TO KNOW YOUR PRIORITIES OBVIOUSLY.
ANOTHER IMPORTANT THING IS THAT THE STATE PORTION OF THIS WAS FUNDED THROUGH THE RESILIENCE FLORIDA PROGRAM, WHICH PROVIDES A JUST FRIDAY PUBLISHED THEIR LIST OF POTENTIAL PROJECTS FOR FUNDING EACH YEAR AND THAT IS A PRETTY SUCCESSFUL GRANTING PROGRAM THAT WILL PROVIDE UP TO 50% COST SHARE.
THEY FUND SHORELINE PROJECTS, THEY FUNDED RELOCATION OF FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY, THAT WASTE WATER PLAN, I WORKED ON THAT GRANT FOR THEM.
SO, THAT PROGRAM IS AN IMPORTANT PROGRAM BECAUSE THE PATHWAY TO FUNDING IS THAT YOUR PROJECTS IDENTIFY A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT.
AND SO IF YOU HAVE YOUR FOCUS AREAS MAPPED, YOU KNOW, OF WHERE THE FLOODING IS GOING TO OCCUR, YOU HAVE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES LAID OUT, YOU'RE MORE COMPETITIVE IN THAT FUNDING SHOULD YOU CHOOSE TO GO DOWN THAT PATH AS WELL. SO, THAT'S WHY WE DIDN'T PUT A BUDGET AND COST ESTIMATES ON THESE THINGS.
WE DIDN'T WANT IT TO SEEM LIKE IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS BEING, YOU KNOW, FORCED UPON A LOCAL GOVERNMENT. BUT IT IS A LONGER TERM BROADER STRATEGY THAT THE IMPORTANT PART OF IT ALSO IS THE TIMING OF WHEN THE IMPACTS ARE GOING TO OCCUR.
YOU KNOW THAT IN REAL ESTATE WITH YOUR PROPERTIES.
AM I LOOKING AT SOMETHING FURTHER EAST THAT IS CLOSER TO THE IMPACTS OR SOMETHING FURTHER WEST THAT I HAVE MORE TIME.
SO THERE IS VALUABLE INFORMATION TO MAKE THOSE DECISIONS SHOULD YOU MAKE THEM DOWN THE PATH. BUT I UNDERSTAND, FUNDING IS TOUGH FOR EVERYBODY RIGHT NOW.
THAT'S WHY I ALWAYS GET OPTIMISTIC RIGHT AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF THE STATE'S LIST OF 100 PLUS GRANT APPLICATIONS WHERE THETHE NEED A BILLION DOLLARS AND THE REQUEST IS A BILLION DOLLARS AND THE LEGISLATURE PUTS 100 TO 200 MILLION INTO IT EACH YEAR.
67 COUNTIES, 400 PLUS MUNICIPALITIES, SO THAT IS ONE PROGRAM AND I WILL SAY THIS ABOUT OTHER GRANTING PROGRAMS AS WELL, IF YOU CAN POINT TO THE PRIORITY IN A DOCUMEN, WITH SOME DATA TO SUPPORT IT, YOU'RE GOING TO BE STRONGER IN THAT.
THE OTHER THING IS ALSO, YOU KNOW, EVERY FIVE YEARS YOU HAVE TO UPDATE THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY WHICH FLOWS THROUGH THE COUNTY, THE MUNICIPALITIES PLUG INTO THAT PROCESS WITH PROJECT PRIORITIES THAT THEY HAVE. AND THEN WHEN YOU HAVE A DISASTER DECLARATION, OR FEDERAL HAZARD MONEY THAT COMES INTO PLAY, YOU NOW HAVE A PRIORITIZED LIST OF PROJECTS. SO, THERE ARE SOME BENEFITS TO AT LEAST HAVING THE PRIORITIES BASED ON THE FLOOD RISK AND THE HAZARD.
BUT YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD.
THERE IS DIMINISHING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THAT TYPE OF FUNDING OUT THERE AND KNOWING THAT, YOU WANT TO BE MORE COMPETITIVE FOR WHAT'S LEFT ON THE TABLE.
>> I'M GOOD. SO, THANK YOU FOR THAT.
I SEE THIS A LITTLE DIFFERENTLY. I GUESS MY -- A COUPLE QUESTIONS TO BE CLEAR. WHEN WILL THE REPORT BE COMPLETED AND DONE THAT WE'LL HAVE
IT? >> WE'RE HOPING TO BRING IT BACK TO YOU IN JANUARY.
>> SO, FOLLOWING UP ON BRODERICK, THIS IS THE PART OF GOVERNMENT THAT NO ONE REALLY LIKES, IT IS NOT SEXY, BUT IT IS WAY IN THE FUTURE, BUT WE ALL KNOW THAT WHEN STUFF FLOODS, AND WATER HITS AND DAMAGED AND EVERYBODY IS LOOKING FOR US TO PROVIDE SOLUTIONS OR PROVIDE WARNINGS AND THAT'S WHAT THIS IS, SO WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE WE COMMUNICATE THAT PROPERLY TO THE PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT RISK EACH AND EVERY DAY. AND WE'RE LOOKING AT HOW DO WE TAKE A LIMITED BUDGET, THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE CUT AND PRIORITIZE WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO OPERATE IN CASE OF FLOODING, DAMAGE, ET CETERA, SO THAT WE CAN PROVIDE THE ESSENTIAL SERVICES. SO I SEE THAT HERE AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE COMMUNICATE THAT TO THE PUBLIC SO THEY UNDERSTAND. YOU START TALKING 27, 21, PEOPLE -- NONE OF US ARE GOING TO BE AROUND AT THAT POINT, RIGHT? BUT THE WORK THAT WE DO NOW AND HOW WE CALL THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE PUBLIC TODAY, BECAUSE IT CAN START RAINING TOMORROW AND FLOODING AND WE'LL HAVE PROBLEMS AT CITY HALL, RIGHT? SO, MY QUESTION TO YOU IS, WHEN IT COMES TO SOME OF THE ASSETS, AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR THAT WE HAVE MANY ASSETS THAT BELONG TO THE CITY. DID YOU GO THROUGH AND PUT THOSE IN AND FACTOR THAT IN OR WILL THAT BE OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO FACTOR IN ALL OF OUR ASSETS AND WHERE THEY FIT WITH THIS MAPPING OF WHAT IS GOING TO FLOOD BASED ON THAT?
>> YES. THAT PORTION OF THE PROJECT IS CALLED THE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS.
>> WE HAVE A FLOOD ANALYSIS, AND THEN WE HAVE AN ANALYSIS
[00:50:02]
WHERE WE MAP THE ASSETS AND LAYLAY THE LAYERS ON TOP OF IT.>> SO, FROM A CITY'S PERSPECTIVE, WE'LL BE ABLE TO SEE ALL OF OUR ASSETS AND THEN PRIORITIZE. I AGREE WITH YOU, SEAWALL IS FAILING, MR. K. UBACEK POINTED THAT OUT TO ME ONE DAY. WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT FROM AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE AND THAT IDEA, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO REPAIR A WALL THAT IF IT FALLS INTO THE OCEAN, WE HAVE ANOTHER ISSUE, RIGHT? SO I THINK WE -- I APPRECIATE THE COMMENT, BUT I JUST HAD TO SAY THAT WE NEED TO FIND A WAY TO ALSO MAKE SURE THAT THE PUBLIC COMES ALONG IN BREAKING THIS DOWN TO UNDERSTAND WHY WE'RE SPENDING THIS TIME.
I AGREE WITH YOU THE LEGISLATION AND WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IN TALLAHASSEE THIS YEAR IS GOING TO BE INTERESTING COMPARED TO THIS. I THINK THE TIMING OF THIS IS GREAT. BUT I THINK THIS COMMISSION GIVES US ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO TALK TO OUR STATE DELEGATION ABOUT SOME MORE RECENT INFORMATION, SPECIFICALLY FOR THE COUNTY, AND FORT PIERCE, FOR ST. LUCIE, HOW THIS WILL IMPACT THE THE DISTRICTS THEY REPRESENT AND PRIORITIZING THOSE THINGS.
SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH, I APPRECIATE IT.
>> SURE. >> COMMISSIONER GAINES?
OKAY. >> JUST ADD THAT REMEMBER WE DID 2040, 2070 AND 2100. WE CAN'T PLAN THAT FAR, RIGHT?
>> WE CAN THINK ABOUT IT, WE KNOW IT IS GOING TO BE ITERATIVE IF WE NEED TO ELEVATE SOMETHING THAT ALREADY EXISTS. THAT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN ONE FELLED SWOOP.
AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO PLAN TO THAT.
HOWEVER, 2040 IS 15 YEARS AWAY. MOST OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT A CITY OR A COUNTY IS GOING TO BE WORKING ON, IT TAKES, YOU KNOW, FIVE YEARS, JUST TO GET THE PLANS DONE. PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO, PHASE THREE, THAT'S HOW WE NEED TO DO IT, RIGHT? GET THE MONEY, PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO, PHASE THREE, THE RESILIENT FLORIDA PROGRAM THAT DOES FUND INFRASTRUCTURE, IF YOU GOT A PHASE ONE, YOU'RE IN BETTER LIGHT TO GET PHASE TWO, RIGHT? THOSE ARE SOME OF THE STRATEGIES.
AND THEN 2070 IS A BRIDGE OR A ROAD, YOU KNOW.
YOU GOT TO LOOK AT THE LIFE SPAN OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE ITSELF. THAT -- YOU'RE RIGHT, THOUGH.
THAT'S HARD TO COMMUNICATE TO THE PUBLIC.
>> I'M WORRIED ABOUT 2026 AND TOMORROW WHEN IT RAINS AND PEOPLE ARE CALLING ME THAT AVENUE C IS FLOODED.
I GOT TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO UNDO THAT RIGHT NOW.
>> WHAT WE LIKE TO INSTILL WHEN WE TALK TO THE COMMUNITY IS WE'RE PARTNERS. THERE IS THINGS THEY CAN DO IN THEIR OWN -- IN THEIR OWN NEIGHBORHOODS, NOT JUST THEIR YARDS, THEIR OWN NEIGHBORHOODS, AND JUST TO SUPPORT THE WORK THAT, YOU KNOW, OUR GOVERNMENTS ARE DOING.
>> WE DO, YES. AND WE HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO MOVED HERE FROM SOME PLACE ELSE. AND DON'T UNDERSTAND THE ECOSYSTEM OF FLORIDA AND SO THAT'S AN EDUCATION PROCESS TOO. I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU IN JANUARY. THIS IS KIND OF LIKE FUTURE STUFF, FUTURISTIC STUFF THAT WE ALL NEED TO BE THINKING ABOUT.
>> ONE FOLLOW- UP QUESTION. IN YOUR ANALYSIS, I'M SURE -- OKAY, WE GET THE -- WHAT DID YOU CALL IT, THE PART THAT IS --
>> SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS THAT LOOKS AT ASSETS AND FLOODING, YEAH.
>> DOES IT RATE THOSE ASSETS AS TO WHAT IS THE MOST VULNERABLE, VERSUS THE LEAST
YES. >> THE REASON I SAY THAT IS ONE OF THE RECENT EVENTS WE HAD HERE IN THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE, I HAVE ASSETS EAST AND WEST. I HAVE WIND DAMAGE IN THE EAST AND FLOODING IN THE WEST. SO, IT WAS GLOBAL.
IT WASN'T JUST NECESSARILY POCKETED TO BARRIER ISLAND OR DOWNTOWN, ET CETERA. SO, IF YOU HAVE A RATING SYSTEM THAT -- AND YOU HAVE A SCHEDULE OF HOW YOU PROVIDE THAT RATING SYSTEM, OR A DEFINITION, THAT WILL MAKE FOR AN INTERESTING READING.
>> WE RANK THE ASSETS, ONE THROUGH FIVE. 1S, 2S AND 3S ARE HIGHER IMPORTANT ASSETS, 4S AND 5S ARE IN PRETTY GOOD SHAPE FOR THE LONGER TERM. AND THE CALCULATION OF THAT RANKING LOOKS AT FLOOD DEPTH, TYPE OF FLOODING, OCCURRENCES OF FLOODING, AND WHEN.
>> AND THAT METHODOLOGY WAS DEVELOPED BY THE STEERING COMMITTEE.
>> THE OTHER THING TOO IS IT IS NOT JUST ALL IN A PHYSICAL MAP SERIES, LIKE, IT IS ALL IN GIS BEING PROVIDED TO YOUR STAFF AS WELL. SO, IF YOU HAVE A CONCERN ABOUT ASSET A AND YOU WANT TO KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT THAT NUMBER ONE OR NUMBER TWO RANKED ASSET, THEY'LL BE ABLE TO PULL THAT INFORMATION UP FOR YOU IN A MAPPING PROGRAM AND DIVE INTO
IT. >> IT DOESN'T GET INTO THE TECHNICALITIES OF THE PARTICULAR PROPERTY WE'RE LOOKING TO ASSESS TAKEN WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE TO RENOVATE IT TO --
>> NO. IT JUST SAYS THIS ASSET IS
[00:55:01]
PROBLEMATIC BECAUSE IT IS GOING TO BE HIT BY THIS TYPE OF FLOODING IN 2040.>> AND IT ALSO DOES NOT, BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO BE IN THIS JUDGMENT ABOUT SAYING, WE'RE GOING TO RANK THIS ASSET HIGHER BECAUSE IT IS A ROAD VERSUS THIS ASSET WHICH IS A CITY REFUELING BUILDING OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, YOU MAKE THOSE DECISIONS, WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT THE SCIENCE AND THE DATA ABOUT WHEN IT IS GOING TO BE IMPACTED AND HOW SEVERELY.
>> COMMISSIONER BRODERICK, WE'RE STILL WORKING ON THAT LIST, THE CRITICAL ASSET LIST UNDER THE RANKINGS AS WELL AS A MAP VIEWER, WHICH, AGAIN, IN THE NEXT MONTH WILL BE TURNING OVER TO YOUR GIS AND YOUR BOARD.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING
[B. Annual Update (2024–2025) from Treasure Coast Homeless Services Council on Services Provided to Fort Pierce’s Unsheltered Population.]
OKAY, THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE ANNUAL UPDATE FROM THE TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL ON SERVICES PROVIDED TO FORT PIERCE'S UNSHELTERED POPULATION.MISS MOORE WILL GIVE A PRESENTATION AND UPDATE.
>> I WOULD LIKE TO ASK RAMY KNUCKLES TO JOIN ME.
EXCUSE ME. DID YOU GET TOO EXCITED LAST NIGHT AT THE PARADE?
>> LATER IN THE AGENDA, THE COMMISSION, YOU WILL BE CONSIDERING RENEWING THE TREASURE -- THE INTERLOCAL FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH ST.
LUCIE COUNTY. WE ARE ASKING -- WE HAVE CONTRIBUTED FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS ABOUT $125,000 TO THE COUNTY.
>> ANNUALLY. >> ANNUALLY, YES, MA'AM.
FOR SERVICES THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED AT OUR HOMELESS HUB. STAFF THOUGHT IT WOULD BE IMPORTANT THAT YOU HEAR FROM RAMY KNUCKLES, THE VISIONARY LEADER OF OUR TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL, SO HE CAN PROVIDE SORT OF AN OVERVIEW AND AS WELL AS JUST TO TELL YOU WHERE WE ARE AND WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN DOING HERE IN THETHE OF FORT PIERCE.
WELCOME. >> GOOD MORNING, MA'AM.
MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THANK YOU FOR INVITING US TODAY. MY NAME IS RAMY
KNUCKLES. >> YOU NEED TO SPEAK UP A LITTLE BIT OR GET THAT MIC CLOSER TO YOU.
>> MY NAME IS RAMY KNUCKLES, VISIONARY LEADER FOR THE TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL.
I'M ALSO A MEMBER OF THE HOMELESS ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY. I BELIEVE YOU HAVE A COPY OF THE REPORT THAT WAS PROVIDED TOTO COMMUNITY OVER THE LAST YEAR.
SO, MANY OF THE STATISTICS THAT ARE IN THAT REPORT ARE FROM JULY OF 2024 THROUGH JULY OF 2025.
TODAY I DO HAVE WITH ME THE DIRECTOR OF OUR SHELTER, MR. ARE A ARMANZO PIMEN.
THERE WE GO. OUR MISSION SPECIFICALLY IS TO END HOMELESSNESS ON THE TREASURE COAST AND ENSURE IF HOMELESSNESS DOES HAPPEN, IT IS RARE OR NONRECURRING.
WE ARE THE DESIGNATED LEAD AGENCY BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND THE OFFICE OF HOMELESSNESS FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOR WHAT IS CALLED THE HOMELESS CONTINUUM OF CARE, FLORIDA 509, WHICH REPRESENTS INDIAN RIVER, ST. LUCIE AND MARTIN COUNTIES.
ABOUT FOUR YEARS AGO, WE STARTED OPERATING THE HOUSING HUB ALSO KNOWN AS ADAM'S PLACE, TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO SHELTER AND COORDINATING ENTRY, OUTREACH, HOUSING NAVIGATION, TO RESIDENTS EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND IN FORT PIERCE.
WE HAVE BEEN FORTUNATE AND WE APPRECIATE YOUR CONTINUED COMMITMENT OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. LAST -- THE RECENT NUMBERS WE HAVE SERVED 166 CLIENTS AT THE HUB.
AND OUT OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS, 135 HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY HOUSED. THE SERVICES THAT WE PROVIDE AT THE HOUSING HUB INCLUDE IMMEDIATE AND SAFE EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR MEN AND WOMEN.
IN 2023 WE EXPANDED TO SERVING WOMEN.
WE PROVIDE COORDINATED INTAKE WHICH IS A REQUIREMENT WITH HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT, CASE MANAGEMENT, DIVERSION AND RAPID RESOLUTION SERVICES, BENEFITS THAT -- I'LL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF A BENEFIT THAT WILL HELP SOMEONE APPLY FOR.
LET'S SAY SOMEONE IS ON -- IS -- HAS A DISABLING CONDITION AND HAS NOT APPLIED FOR THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY.
[01:00:02]
WE HAVE SOMEONE ON STAFF WHO DOES THAT FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL TO HELP THEM GAIN ACCESS. WHICH ALSO ASSISTS THEM IN BEING ABLE TO PAY FOR THEIR OWN RENT. IF YOU'RE HOMELESS, THERE IS A 90- DAYTIME PERIOD. SO THE REASON WHY WE HAVE SOMEONE WHO DOES THAT IN OUR OFFICE IS BECAUSE IT GETS THEM ON TO ASSISTANCE MUCH MORE QUICKLY. WE PROVIDE CAREER NAVIGATION AND CONNECT TO OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES WITH HOUSING NAVIGATION. WE HAVE A HOUSING NAVIGATOR WHO ASSISTS AS WELL FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO NEED HELP LOOKING FOR UNITS.AND MAKES RELATIONSHIPS WITH LOCAL LANDLORDS IN THE COMMUNITY. PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTHCARE, WHICH IS PROVIDED BY HANDS CLINIC AND NEW HORIZONS.
OUR STREET OUTREACH PROGRAM WAS EXPANDED IN 24 IN ALIGNMENT WITH HOUSE BILL 1365. THE -- SO WE ADDED AL TO OUR TEAM AT THAT POINT. AND HE CONNECTS INDIVIDUALS TO MEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, WORKING WITH THE MOBILE RESPONSE TEAMS, AND OBVIOUSLY WITH THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT.
SO, LINKS TO INDIVIDUALS DIRECTLY TO THE HOUSING HUB, SO WE CAN PROVIDE THE SERVICES SO THEY CAN MOVE ON. OUR HOUSING STABILIZATION, WE PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO WANT TO SHARE HOUSING BECAUSE AS YOU ALL KNOW, HOUSING HAS BECOME VERY EXPENSIVE AND MOST PEOPLE WHO ARE ELDERLY OR ARE ON DISABILITY CAN NO LONGER AFFORD A UNIT ON THEIR OWN UNLESS THEY'RE IN SUBSIDIZED HOUSING.
WE HAVE AN EXTENSIVE LANDLORD PARTNERSHIP HERE IN ST.
LUCIE COUNTY AND IN CITY OF FORT PIERCE.
THE STATE PROVIDES FUNDS FOR US TO PROVIDE RAPID REHOUSING FOR INDIVIDUALS LEAVING THE SHELTER SO WE CAN PAY FOR THEIR FIRST MONTH'S RENT, THEIR SECURITY DEPOSITS, FOR UTILITIES AND THE DEPOSIT TO THE LANDLORDS. AND SOMETIMES WE CAN DO ONGOING RENTAL ASSISTANCE DEPENDING ON THE SEVERITY OF THEIR CHALLENGE WITH HOMELESSNESS. MOST IMPORTANTLY WE DO EVERYTHING WE TRY TO DO TO DIVERT THEM FROM THE CITY ALTOGETHER. IF WE HAVE FAMILY OR FRIENDS THAT WE CAN GET THEM TO MOVE IN WITH, AND ASSIST THEM TO BECOME BETTER ESTABLISHED DURING THE TIME PERIOD WHEN THEY'RE WITH THEIR FAMILIES, IT IS USUALLY A BETTER APPROACH FOR US.
SO WE DO HAVE STRONG COLLABORATIONS WITH CAREER SOURCE, AGAIN, NEW HORIZONS, I SIT ON THE BOARD FOR NEW HORIZONS AS WELL, SO WE HAVE GOOD PARTNERSHIP FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE AND THREE OF THEIR STAFF MEMBERS ACTUALLY WORK IN OUR OFFICES TO PROVIDE THE SUPPORTS THAT WE NEED.
AS I INDICATED BEFORE, OUR PHYSICAL HEALTH IS PROVIDEDPROVIDED HANDS CLINIC IN ADDITION TO WHOLE FAMILY HEALTH AND THE FLORIDA HEALTH DEPARTMENT.
OUR RECOVERY SUPPORTS ARE PROVIDED BY NEW HORIZONS, AND RIGHT LIFE. SO WHAT WE SEE LOCALLY, WE HAVE THE HIGH COST OF LIVING LIMITS THE WAY THAT INDIVIDUALS CAN ACCESS HOUSING AND RENTAL INVENTORY. SENIORS ARE INCREASINGLY AT A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF LOSING THEIR HOUSING.
AND BEING IN HOUSING INSECURITY. WE FIND MORE AND MORE SENIORS WHO ARE LIVING IN THEIR CARS BECAUSE UNFORTUNATELY WHAT THEY THOUGHT WOULD WORK WITH LIVING ON SOCIAL SECURITY OR ANY OF THEIR INVESTMENTS DID NOT WORK OUT FOR THEM.
THE LACK OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE COMMUNITY HAS BECOME A LITTLE CHALLENGING FOR EVEN US TO HOUSE FOLKS. THAT'S WHY WE REALLY FOCUS ON PEOPLE SHARING HOUSING. IT IS NOT SOMETHING WE PREFER, BUT IT IS A REALITY OF LIFE FOR MANY INDIVIDUALS. AND SO WE TRY TO SELL IT AS, WELL, YOU LIVED WITH SOMEONE WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, YOU MAY BE IN YOUR 60S NOW AND MAY HAVE TO RETHINK YOUR PROCESS OF WANTING TO LIVE ALONE BECAUSE IF YOU ONLY HAVE $1200 A MONTH AND YOUR RENT IS $1100, THAT LEAVES YOU WITH HOW MUCH MONEY TO LIVE OFF OF? WE HAVE TO WORK WITH INDIVIDUALS ON ADDITIONAL RESOURCES AND THAT MAKES IT VERY CHALLENGING FOR INDIVIDUALS IN THE COMMUNITY. VETERANS REMAINS A HIGH PRIORITY. WE HAVE A VETERANS PROGRAM THROUGH TREASURE COAST ON ALL THREE COUNTIES. LAST YEAR WE SERVED OVER 170 HOUSEHOLDS IN OUR BUDGET JUST FROM THE VA WAS A LITTLE OVER A MILLION DOLLARS.
SO WE WERE ABLE TO HOUSE THAT MANY HOUSEHOLDS AS WELL.
THAT WERE VETERAN HOUSEHOLDS. SO, JUST IN CITY OF FORT PIERCE, JUST THIS YEAR, 4900 SERVICES
[01:05:01]
PROVIDED. THAT'S IN THE RANGE OF ALL THE SERVICES THAT WERE THERE. AND IN 2025, SINCE 2023, MY ARRIVAL, WE WORKED DILIGENTLY ON REDUCING OUR HOMELESS NUMBERS.WE KNOW WE REDUCED THOSE NUMBERS BECAUSE WE HOUSED THAT MANY PEOPLE.
BECAUSE WE WERE ABLE TO BRING IN ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO HOUSE INDIVIDUALS TO REDUCE OUR NUMBERS.
WE ALSO REALIZED THAT WITH INDIVIDUALS LIVING DOUBLED UP, THAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT HUD WILL ALLOW US TO SUBMIT.
SO, WHEN WE DO OUR ANNUAL COUNT, IT IS A ONE- DAY, 24- HOUR TIME PERIOD, IT DOES NOT COUNT THE INDIVIDUALS THAT WE SERVE FROM JANUARY THROUGH DECEMBER.
SO, THERE IS A DISCREPANCY AND WE REALIZE THAT.
WE DO TALK ABOUT THAT OPENLY AND PUBLICLY IN THE COMMUNITY.
HOWEVER, THE ONE DAYDAY WE CONSISTENTLY HAVE SHOWN OVER THE LAST THREE YEARS A DECREASE. LAST YEAR WE HAD A 37% DECREASE HERE IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY.
SPEAKING OF OUR ACCOUNT, WE WILL HOLD OUR ACCOUNT IN 2026. IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN OUT ON THE STREETS AND COUNTED WITH US BEFORE, I WELCOME YOU TO JOIN ME. I WILL BE HERE DURING THAT 24- HOUR TIME PERIOD WILL BE THE LAST THURSDAY OF THE MONTH OF JANUARY.
IT IS QUITE AN EXPERIENCE TO LEARN AND ENGAGE IN.
AND YOU WILL CONNECT WITH THE HOMELESS COMMUNITY THAT DAY.
AND IN JANUARY, WE'LL SPLIT THE COUNTY INTO FOUR DIFFERENT SECTIONS. AND WE'LL START COUNTING AROUND 3:00 IN THE MORNING AND END AROUND 11:00 THAT NIGHT.
WE WILL UNVEIL OUR NUMBERS IN APRIL AT OUR IN HISTORY AWARDS DURING APRIL. LOOKING AHEAD FOR US, THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED PARTNERSHIP WITH US. MAYOR, I WANT TO COMMEND YOU FOR MAKING THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS YOU MADE AT THE LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST. IT WAS VERY COMMENDABLE.
YOU WERE THE ONLY MEMBER OF PUBLIC OFFICE THAT SAID ANYTHING ABOUT HOMELESSNESS THAT DAY.
SO, IT WAS HEART WARMING TO HEAR THAT THE COMMITMENT THAT THE CITY HAS, SO, THANK YOU. FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, WE ARE -- WE ARE FACED WITH SOME -- SOME THINGS THAT ARE VERY CHALLENGING FROM THE FEDERAL LEVEL FOR US.
A NUMBER OF -- YOU PROBABLY ALL ARE AWARE, WE HAVE BEEN RUNNING THE CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS, SERVING INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE DUAL DIAGNOSIS, MAYBE A MENTAL HEALTH ISSUE OR HEALTH ISSUE. AND WE HAVE BEEN PROVIDING PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THESE HOUSEHOLDS ACROSS ALL THREE COUNTIES. AND ALL THREE COUNTIES WE SERVED ABOUT 170 HOUSEHOLDS. UNDER THE NEW NOFA DUE JANUARY 16TH, PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING IS NO LONGER A PRIORITY. THERE ARE MAKING THE PRIORITIES OUTREACH, ENGAGEMENT, AND TRANSITIONAL HOUSING. SO WE'RE HAT IS HAPPENING IS IT IS UP ENDING THE ENTIRE SYSTEM AND WE HAVE TO DETERMINE HOW TO HOUSE INDIVIDUALS WHO WE HAVE BEEN HOUSING WITH PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE LAST 20 YEARS.
AND SO, IT IS -- IT WILL BE A MAJOR TASK FOR US.
RIGHT NOW MY FOCUS IS BRINGING IN THE REVENUE FOR THIS -- FOR OUR ORGANIZATION, FOR ALL THREE COUNTIES, WE DO HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO BRING IN 4.
2 MILLION ACROSS ALL THREE COUNTIES.
AND SO I'M WORKING REALLY DILIGENTLY WITH OUR PARTNERS TO ENSURE WE HAVE THE APPLICATIONS, AND WE ARE -- WE SUBMIT A SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION TO BRING IN ALL THE REVENUE NECESSARY. YOU'LL PROBABLY HEAR MORE FROM ME ABOUT POTENTIAL PARTNERSHIPS THAT WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO KEEP THOSE INDIVIDUALS HOUSED. THAT'S IT.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COMMISSIONER GAINES, YOU WANT TO START?
>> I CAN. I GUESS I'M PARTIAL BECAUSE I SIT ON THE COMMITTEE.
>> THIS COMMITTEE DOES A GREAT --GREAT THEY DO A GREAT JOB. AND ONE OF THE THINGS AS SITTING HERE, BUDGET SEASON COMES BACK UP, WE REALLY NEED TO LOOK AT OUR PART BECAUSE WHAT HE'S NOT GOING TO SAY, AND THAT'S FINE, MOST OF THESE NUMBERS ARE ST. LUCIE COUNTY. THE PROBLEM IS HERE.
SO, IF WE CAN HELP ANY KIND OF WAY TO GET THE HOMELESS OFF
[01:10:03]
THE STREETS, OR INTO SOME TYPE OF PROGRAM OR SOME TYPE OF HOUSING THAT HE TALKED ABOUT, IT IS BETTER FOR THE WHOLE ENTIRE CITY. ONE OF THE THINGS, AND IF YOU TALK TO ANYBODY IN THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM ARE THE NUMBER OF KIDS THAT ARE LIVING, LIVING IN CARS, OR THEY HAVE A GREAT PRINCIPAL THAT ALLOWING THEM TO COME TO THE SCHOOLS EARLY, TAKE A SHOWER, BEFORE THE OTHER KIDS GET THERE. SO, YOU KNOW, WE ALL TALK ABOUT HOMELESSNESS, BUT I WOULD LOVE FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE TO, YOU KNOW, TO STAND UP AND SAY, HEY, WE BELIEVE INTO THESE PROGRAMS AND I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE BUDGET CUTS AND EVERYTHING THAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR, AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT IS COMING OUT OF TALLAHASSEE, BUT THAT IS SOMETHING WE REALLY NEED TO LOOK AT TO SEE IF WE CAN CONTRIBUTE MORE BECAUSE THEY DO A GREAT JOB IN GETTING SOMEONE FROM HOMELESSNESS BACK INTO A HOME THAT IS MORE PRODUCTIVE IN THE COMMUNITY AND HELPS EVERYBODY ELSE. THAT'S WHERE I'M AT ON THAT.>> ANYONE ELSE WANT TO COMMENT?
>> I JUST SAY PUBLICLY, THANK YOU, MR. KNUCKLES FOR THIS UPDATE. YOU KNOW, THIS IS OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING THAT WE HEAR FROM, I HEAR FROM THE COMMUNITY, ET CETERA.
I THINK THAT PARTNERSHIP WITH NEW HORIZONS AND THE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH IS OF CONCERN. I RECENTLY MET WITH THE NEW EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THERE TO EXPRESS MY CONCERNS AND MAKE SURE THAT THAT PARTNERSHIP WAS STILL THERE WITH THE FORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND THAT THAT MOBILE CRISIS UNIT WAS ACTIVELY RESPONDING ON SOME OF THE BEHAVIORAL SITUATIONS WHERE WE KNOW THOSE SUBJECTS THAT ARE CONSTANTLY IN THAT SYSTEM AND CYCLE THAT THEY MAY BE OFF THEIR MEDICINES AND NEW HORIZONS WOULD BE THAT. THAT'S EXTREMELY IMPORTANT AND I'M GLAD YOU MENTIONED THAT.
AND I WANTED TO CONTINUE TO ENCOURAGE THAT.
I'LL CONTINUE TO PUSH FOR MY END THAT PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN POLICE DEPARTMENT AND NEW HORIZONS AND YOURSELF BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THE PSYCHOSIS THAT WE SEE IN OUR COMMUNITY AND REACTION IS THERE, AND IN THE FUTURE, I GUESS AS YOU PRESENT TO US, IT WILL BE KIND OF INTERESTING FOR US TO UNDERSTAND THAT AND SOME OF THE DATA THAT YOU HAVE AS TO WHAT IS THAT RESPONSE, WHAT ARE THE NUMBER OF CALLS THAT WE ARE HANDLING IN FORT PIERCE. MY OTHER THING TOO IS THAT, AND HAPPY TO SUPPORT, LIKE WE WILL LATER IN OUR AGENDA HERE, YOU KNOW, AS WE LOOK AT THIS GROWING SITUATION, WE'RE SPANNING OVER THREE COUNTIES, YOU SPAN THREE COUNTIES, YOU KNOW. HOPEFULLY YOU ARE SEEING SUPPORT FROM THE OTHER COMMISSIONS, BOTH CITY AND COUNTY, AND THOSE JURISDICTIONS THAT IS STEPPING UM AND IF NOT, I WOULD LIKE TO THAT.
WE SERVE WITH THE SAME COMMISSIONERS AND DIFFERENT COMMITTEES AND IF I NEED TO TALK TO MY COLLEAGUES IN STEWART AND VERO, WE HAVE TO, BECAUSE WE CANNOT HAVE A PUSH- PULL EFFECT.
WE HAVE TO TREAT THEM WHERE THEY ARE.
AND SO I'M NOT GOING TO MAKE ANY ALLEGATIONS, BUT THERE ARE RUMORS THAT THEY GET HERE BECAUSE WE HAVE A VERY COMPASSIONATE, PASSIONATE COMMUNITY, LARGELY LED BY OUR FAITH LEADERS HERE. BUT WE CANNOT BEAT UP THE AREA THAT TAKES ON THAT. THEY GOT FAITH LEADERS IN VERO AND FAITH LEADERS IN MARTIN COUNTY. AND WE NEED TO MAKE SURE -- WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT. I GUESS WHAT I'M ASKING FOR, WHEN YOU'RE REPORTING AND EVEN IN ONE- OFFS, I WOULD LIKE TO MEET WITH YOUR STAFF TO UNDERSTAND THAT.
BECAUSE WE CAN'T TAKE ON THE PRESSURES OF ABSOLVING THIS JUST IN FORT PIERCE.
OKAY. THE LAST THING I'LL SAY TO YOU IS, RECENTLY CAME BY SOME INFORMATION AND AS I VISITED YOUR WEBSITE, I KIND OF LOOKED AT YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR YOUR ENTITY.
AND I NOTICED THAT THERE WERE -- THIS BOARD AND THERE WERE COMMISSIONERS, ET CETERA, FORT PIERCE IS NOT ON THE BOARD. I ASKED MR. CHESS TO HELP ME UNDERSTAND THAT. I DON'T KNOW WHERE WE ARE, I'LL CIRCLE BACK, BUT I WANTED TO BRING TO THIS COMMISSION THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE A PERSON SITTING ON THAT BOARD FROM THIS COMMISSION.
AND I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S CONFLICT OR WHAT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO BRING IT TO OUR ATTENTION BECAUSE WE'RE CONTRIBUTING AND I THINK AT SOME POINT WE HAVE TO LOOK AT OUR REPRESENTATION.
COMMISSIONER GAINES SITS ON THE TASK FORCE, BUT THERE IS A BOARD HERE THAT WE DON'T HAVE REPRESENTATION ON. SO, THAT'S MY COMMENT AT THIS
[01:15:03]
POINT. >> DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING?
>> CERTAINLY. I'LL FOLLOW UP ON COMMISSIONER JOHNSON'S COMMENT. HE'S BEING POLITE.
I'M GOING TO PUT A FINE POINT ON THIS.
HOMELESS PEOPLE ARE BEING DRIVEN HERE FROM LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES AND DUMPED HERE.
DROPPED IN FORT PIERCE, LET FORT PIERCE MANAGE THE PROBLEM.
THERE IS A WELL KNOWN FACT. AND IT IS DESPICABLE THAT OTHER ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENTS ARE DOING THIS, BUT IT IS TAKING PLACE CONSISTENTLY.
YOU CAN GET THAT INFORMATION RIGHT FROM THE HOMELESS PEOPLE. HOW DID YOU GET HERE? I GOT DROPPED OFF. SO, THE PROBLEM HAS BECOME CENTRIC IN THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE AS THE HOMELESS POPULATION HERE CONTINUES TO EXPAND. AND WE HAD TO DECOMMISSION CITY PARKS BECAUSE THEY WERE CONGREGATING AND SLEEPING AREAS FOR HOMELESS AND RESIDENTS THAT WANTED TO USE THE PARKS WERE FEELING THREATENED. WE HAD TO DECOMMISSION CITY PARKS BECAUSE OF THE CONDITIONS.
I TRULY APPRECIATE YOUR REPORT AND THE WORK THAT YOUR ORGANIZATION IS DOING, BUT THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE DOESN'T HAVE, AGAIN, I COME BACK TO ASSETS AND REVENUE, WE DON'T HAVE THE REVENUE TO ATTACK THE HOMELESS ISSUE, WHICH WE RECEIVE COMPLAINTS FROM THE .
THEY ARE A POLICING ORGANIZATION. BEEN FORCED INTO THESE ROLES DUE TO LACK OF MENTAL HEALTH. I STRUGGLE WITH THIS ISSUE AS TO WHAT THE ANSWERS ARE. I DON'T HAVE THE ANSWERS TO THIS. THIS COMMISSION DOESN'T HAVE THE ANSWERS TO THIS.
NOR DO WE HAVE THE RESOURCES TO ADDRESS IT.
THIS WOULD TAKE A MUCH MORE COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH AND A STRATEGIC DECISION THAT WE'RE GOING TO APPLY FROM A VERY LIMITED PIE REVENUE ASSETS TO HELP ASSIST THIS PROBLEM AND I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT'S FEASIBLE.
IT IS A GREAT IDEA. BUT WE'RE LOOKING FOR NICKELS ON THE COMMISSION DAIS TO BALANCE THE BUDGET. I DON'T UNDERSTAND AND IT IS NOT FOR LACK OF TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT OUR OPTIONS ARE BECAUSE OUR OPTIONS ARE NONE.
WE HAVE NO OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO US.
SO IT IS VERY DISAPPOINTING. IT IS VERY DISTURBING THAT WE FIND OURSELVES IN THIS SITUATION, BUT THAT IS MY ASSESSMENT OF HOW THE HOMELESS SITUATION IS IN FORT PIERCE.
YOU CAN WALK OUT THE DOOR RIGHT NOW, TAKE A LEFT, WALK DOWN TO THE SQUARE, WALK INTO RIVERFRONT PARK, YOU'LL FIND DOZENS OF PEOPLE.
>> YES. ARE YOU GOING TO FIND -- I'LL LET YOU SPEAK IN A MINUTE -- YOU'RE GOING TO FIND SOMEBODY AT TAYLOR CREEK SHOPPING CENTER STANDING WITH THE SIGN BECAUSE THAT'S A REGULAR SPOT TOO.
>> A REGULAR GUY RIGHT OUT HERE IN THE COURTYARD.
>> RIGHT. I WANTED TO ASK YOU ALSO FOR CLARITY, YOU SERVE THREE COUNTIES, IS THAT CORRECT? WITH YOUR POT OF MONEY? DO YOU -- IS THERE AN ALLOTTED POT OF MONEY FOR EACH COUNTY OR DO YOU TAKE THAT WHOLE POT OF MONEY AND SPEND IT AS NECESSARY?
>> RIGHT. SO, THERE IS AN OUTREACH PERSON FOR EACH COUNTY TOO. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WITH REGARD TO YOUR COMMENT ABOUT LAW ENFORCEMENT AND MRT, IN OUR NEW APPLICATION, ENGAGEMENT WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT IS ONE OF THE PRIMARY RESILIENT FACTORS OF SCORING. SO, I WILL BE WORKING WITH MR. CHESS ON AN AGREEMENT FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AS AN MOU TO SUBMIT AS PART OF OUR APPLICATION PROCESS TO INCREASE OUR WORK WITH MRT AND OUTREACH AND THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT. >> SO WHEN YOU -- MRT IS MOBILE RESPONSE TEAM.
QUESTION. >> GOING DOWN THAT PATH, AND RIGHT WHERE YOU ARE MADAM MAYOR, THE QUESTION I WANT TO UNDERSTAND, WHAT KIND OF FUNDING ARE YOU GETTING FROM STEWART AND MARTIN COUNTY? I HEARD YOU SAID YOU SPLIT WHATEVER COMES IN FROM THE GRANTS, ET CETERA.
WHAT I NEED, IF YOU DON'T, I NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT, I WAS JUST WITH THE MAYOR OF STEWART AND SPENT A LOT OF TIME WITH HIM AND WE NEED TO COMMISSION, THINK ABOUT HOW WE ARE MEETING REGIONALLY AND I SAID THIS BEFORE BECAUSE WE ARE NOT GOING TO CONTINUE TO TAKE THIS PROBLEM, WE CAN'T AFFORD IT.
AND IF I GOT TO CALL IT OUT TO THEM, I CAN CALL IT OUT TO THEM AND GO TO THE COMMISSION MEETINGS TO POINT IT OUT TO THEM IN THEIR CONSTITUENTS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE
AREAS. >> WE DON'T RECEIVE SUPPORT FROM THE CITY OF STEWART.
>> MARTIN COUNTY PROVIDES RESOURCES TO US.
[01:20:04]
>> THE WHOLE ISSUE OF RESOURCES ACROSS ALL THREE COUNTIES IS AN ISSUE. SO --
>> RIGHT. IT IS AN ISSUE THAT YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH AS WELL AS US. WE'RE NOT PUTTING THIS ON YOU.
>> DISPARAGING YOU AND YOUR ORGANIZATION AND WHAT YOU DO.
>> YOU'RE FIGHTING AN UPHILL BATTLE. WE KNOW THAT.
>> WE SHARE THAT FRUSTRATION. WE HAD INTERNAL CONVERSATIONS ABOUT CLIENTS WHO COME FROM ANOTHER COUNTY.
AND WE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO KEEP EVERYONE IN THAT COUNTY.
>> CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION, WHEN YOU DO THE COUNT, CAN YOU ASK THE HOMELESS PEOPLE THAT YOU'RE COUNTING, ARE YOU -- DO YOU TALK TO THEM? CAN YOU ASK THEM HOW LONG THEY HAVE BEEN IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY?
>> IN THE -- THE DAY OF THE COUNT, WHEN WE COULD THE COUNT, WE HAVE A SPECIFIC SET OF DATA THAT WE REQUEST.
AND WE ASK, WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN, WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN LIVING, WHERE DID YOU STAY LAST NIGHT --
>> IS THAT SOMETHING WE CAN ASK, THIS COMMISSION CAN LOOK AT?
>> I WOULD BE VERY INTERESTED IN
THAT. >> HOW DID YOU GET HERE?
>> RIGHT. >> HOW DID YOU END UP IN FORT
PIERCE. >> WHAT TRANSPORTATION DID YOU HERE? YES, SIR.
>> WE KNOW THE SHERIFF'S OFFICES BOTH DROP.
>> THAT'S ANOTHER CONVERSATION.
>> I HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH WITH THE SHERIFF IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ABOUT THAT.
>> WE THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING ON TOP OF THAT.
AND YOU UNDERSTAND WHY THIS IS NOT EQUITABLE AND SHOULD NOT
STAND. >> MADAM MAYOR, I WANT TO CLOSE SAYING, MR. KNUCKLES, WHAT WE'RE AFTER HERE IS, FOR ME, I CAN'T SPEAK FOR MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS, BUT WE NEED MORE DATA, WE NEED INFORMATION SO WE CAN LEVERAGE THAT TO OUR COLLEAGUES, TO OUR SHERIFF IN TALKING TO THEIR SHERIFF BECAUSE THIS -- THIS WILL STOP.
WE GOT TO CALL THIS OUT. THIS IS JUST NOT FAIR.
AND YOU JUST MENTIONED IT. THEY ONLY GAVE $25,000 OUT OF STEWART. AND -- MARTIN COUNTY, SORRY.
STEWART IS ZERO. THAT'S EVEN WORSE AND WE'RE HERE ALLOCATING $125,000.
WE NEED DATA, WE NEED INFORMATION AND I SIT ON THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL MEETING, WE HAVE A MEETING UPCOMING AND I'M GOING TO BRING THIS UP TO MR. -- WHAT IS HIS NAME? TOM LANAHAN. THIS IS A REGIONAL PROBLEM AND WE HAVE THREE JURISDICTIONS HERE AND WE NEED IT DEAL WITH THIS.
>> WE APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS VERY MUCH.
>> QUICK FOLLOW-UP. TALKING FUNDING.
WHAT DOES ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRIBUTE TO YOUR OPERATIONS?
>> ACTUALLY ST. LUCIE COUNTY IS THE ONE COUNTY THAT CONTRIBUTES
THE MOST. >> THE BUDGET IS $800 MILLION?
>> THEY GIVE US 300 FOR THE MEN'S SHELTER AND 300 FOR THE WOMEN'S SHELTER. BUT THAT'S ALL THE RESOURCES THAT WE RECEIVE OTHER THAN -- WE ALSO HAVE -- WE ALSO OWN HOUSING HERE IN FORT PIERCE.
AND THE COUNTY PROVIDESPROVIDES A RIDER THAT HELPS US WITH MITIGATION FUNDS, SO WHEN THINGS HAPPEN TO OUR HOMES, IT HELPS PAY FOR THE HOMES, SO WE CAN KEEP PEOPLE HOUSED.
>> THANK YOU SO MUCH. WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU AND CONTINUING DIALOGUE. THANK YOU.
[9. Consent Agenda]
AGENDA. >> ANY ITEMS, ANY COMMISSIONER WOULD LIKE TO EXTRACT FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA?
>> MADAM MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO PULL ITEM
MICHAEL, OKAY. IF THERE IS NOT ANYTHING ELSE.
I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE
>> CALL A ROLL FOR ALL THE CONSENT AGENDA EXCEPT ITEM A.
[A. Approval of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Supplemental Agreement No. 1 Extending Jetty License Agreement No. DACW17-3-21-0001 for the Operation of Jetty Linear Park by one (1) additional year to December 13, 2026.]
>> YES. >> COMMISSIONER GAINES.
>> I AM CURIOUS AS TO WHY, FIRST UP, I THOUGHT WE OWNED LINEAR PARK, WE DON'T. WE LEASE IT FROM THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. I BELIEVE THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT WAS FOR 10 OR 15 YEAR LEASE TERM.
[01:25:06]
IF YOU HAVE THAT INFORMATION.>> MARCIA COMMAND, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
TO YOUR POINT, COMMISSIONER, YES, WE HAVE TWO AGREEMENTS IN PLACE WITH THE ARMY CORPS. THE FIRST IS A LEASE AGREEMENT, WHICH GOES ALL THE WAY TO 2034.
>> AND THEN YOU HAVE THE LICENSE AGREEMENT, WHICH BASICALLY ALLOWED US TO MAKE THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SITE AND TO OPERATE IT AS A PARK.
THAT'S WHAT'S ON THE TABLE RIGHT NOW WHICH IS A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, WHICH EXTENDS THE EXISTING LICENSE TO NEXT YEAR AS A PLACE HOLDER BECAUSE WE'RE WORK ON A FIVE- YEAR RENEWAL FOR THAT LICENSE. BUT BECAUSE IT IS TAKING THE ARMY CORPS SO LONG TO GET THIS DONE, WE HAVE BEEN IN DISCUSSION SINCE JUNE. SO, WE'RE JUST WAITING ON THEIR ABILITY TO COMPLETE THIS THING AND THEN ONCE THAT IS DONE, THAT WILL BE COMING BACK TO A
CONSEQUENT MEETING. >> THE REASON I BRING THIS UP, THIS IS THE LINEAR PARK FACING THE WATER.
THE PARKING LOT THAT WE LEASE AND THE SQUARE ITSELF, IT IS THE LINEAR STRIP, CORRECT?
>> WELL, WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE ATTACHED LANGUAGE, IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS JUST WHAT GOES OUT INTO THE WATER ON TOP.
AND THAT WAS A QUESTION I WANTED TO ASK.
DOES IT GO ALL THE WAY -- JETTY LINEAR PARK GOES ALL THE WAY TO MANATEE.
RIGHT? I WANTED TO KNOW THAT TOO.
>> I BELIEVE THAT THE TWO AGREEMENTS SHOULD BE MARRIED OR AT LEAST TERMED THE SAME WAY SO WE'RE NOT CHASING ONE YEAR AGREEMENTS WHICH WE'RE GOING TO WRAP UP THIS ONE, AND WE'RE GOING TO IMMEDIATELY ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE NEXT ONE BECAUSE DEALING WITH THE ARMY CORPS IS NOT -- IT IS LIKE DEALING WITH ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, IT TAKES FOREVER. LIKE ANYTHING.
I'M NOT GOING TO SAY THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE, WE'RE FASTER THAN THAT. BUT MY FRUSTRATION ON THIS IS THAT LINEAR PARK IS AN EXTREMELY WELL UTILIZED ASSET.
>> THERE IS PEOPLE ON IT ALL THE TIME.
I'M ON IT MULTIPLE DAYS PER WEEK. AND SO I'M JUST SUGGESTING, I THINK WE CAN DO BETTER HERE, CAN YOU FOCUS THE EFFORTS ON LET'S GET THE MEMORIALIZED ONE YEAR AGREEMENT IN PLACE SO WE'RE PROTECTED, BUT STRETCH THIS OUT TO 2034 AND JUST LOCK IT ALL IN TOGETHER? IS THAT POSSIBLE? IS THAT NOT EVEN ON THE TABLE TO DISCUSS?
>> RIGHT, SO, WE CAN TALK TO THEM ABOUT MAYBE LOOKING AT A LONGER RENEWAL TERM BEYOND FIVE YEARS. IT IS JUST THAT THE CURRENT AGREEMENT ALLOWS FOR FIVE YEAR RENEWALS. THAT'S HOW IT IS STATED IN THE CURRENT LICENSE. BUT WE CAN HAVE THAT DISCUSSION ADMINISTRATIVELY, MR. CHESS, THAT'S SOMETHING WE CAN TALK ABOUT.
>> ARE YOU SAYING -- ARE YOU INDICATING IT HAS AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR FIVE YEARS?
>> IT STATES IF YOU WANT TO RENEW, YOU RENEW AT FIVE- YEAR
INTERVALS. >> WHY DON'T WE DO THAT?
>> FOR CLARITY, WHAT SON THE TABLE RIGHT NOW IS AN EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING LICENSE US ENOUGH TIME. THE REASON THIS IS ON THE TABLE IS BECAUSE I NOTICED HOW LONG IT WAS TAKING AND THEN I -- WE HAVE AN EXPIRATION DATE OF DECEMBER 13. WHICH IS IN A COUPLE OF DAYS.
AND SO TO GET AHEAD OF THAT EX-PER EX- EXPIRATION, IT IS TAKING THEM QUITE A BIT OF TIME TO GET THE FIVE- YEAR LICENSE COMPLETED.
>> OKAY. I KNOW THIS IS TECHNICAL JARGON AND I'M GOING TO GET INTO THE WEEDS MOMENTARILY HERE ON THE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE WORLD.
WE DON'T HAVE AN OPTION TO RENEW. IF IT IS AN OPTION TO RENEW, WE NOTIFY THE LESSER, THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
THAT'S NOT WHAT WE HAVE. YOU'RE INDICATING WE NEED TO NEGOTIATE SOME TYPE OF EXTENSION WITH THEM, CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS, HAVE THE OPTION TO RENEW THAT BENEFITS THE TENANT, THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE, OR WE DON'T, WE HAVE A FRAMEWORK TO SAY THIS IS SUBJECT TO NEGOTIATION. IT IS ONE OF THOSE TWO.
>> WE NOTIFIED THEM BACK IN JUNE WE WERE INTERESTED IN ENGAGING THE FIVE- YEAR RENEWAL OPTION FROM THE EXISTING LICENSE. THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS AGREEMENT. IT IS JUST THAT AS TIME IS GOING ON, HERE WE ARE IN THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, AND OUR EXPIRATION IS COMING UP.
WE'RE SAYING IF YOU CAN'T GET THAT TO US AS QUICKLY AS WE WOULD LIKE AHEAD OF THAT SO WE CAN ENTER INTO A FIVE YEAR, WE NEED SOMETHING IN PLACE VERSUS THIS OPERATING OFF OF A EXPIRED AGREEMENT AT THAT POINT. THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THE SUPPLEMENTAL FOR NOW. AND WE WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE HAD SOMETHING A BIT MORE PERMANENT, HOWEVER, IN THE
[01:30:03]
MEANTIME, JUST SO WE CAN KEEP THINGS OPERATING, WE HAVE WHAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW.>> I THINK WHAT SHE IS SAYING IS JUST THE OPTION TO RENEW IS TAKING THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS A LONG
TIME. >> THAT'S THE ISSUE. THE OPTION TO RENEW, I SEND THEM A LETTER SAYING I'M EXERCISING A OPTION TO RENEW. THIS IS NOT AN OPTION TO RENEW.
IT IS A HYBRID OF THIS THAT I HAVEN'T SEEN THE LANGUAGE OF TO REALLY WRAP MY ARMS AROUND TO SEE WHAT IT SAYS. WE NEED TO EXTEND IT, BECAUSE CLEARLY WE WANT A LONGER TERM DWREMT. IF WE ENTER INTO A TEMPORARY SCENARIO TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A CHAT WITH THEM AND GENERATE WHATEVER DOCUMENTATION IS NECESSARY, I SUGGEST WE NEED TO GET EYES ON THIS, THIS MIGHT FALL INTO THE CITY ATTORNEY'S HANDS TO DETERMINE WHAT IS IT THAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE HERE. IT IS NOT AN OPTION TO RENEW. IT IS A MUTUALLY AGREED TO OPTION.
LET'S GET THE ONE- YEAR IN PLACE SO WE HAVE SOME PROTECTIONS THERE. I DON'T WANT TO SEE THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SHOW UP WITH BULLDOZERS AND START TEARING THAT STUFF UP. THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE CITIZENS WOULD BE -- AND BLAME US. LET'S GET THE ONE YEAR MEMORIALIZED IN THE BOOKS. THIS GOES BACK TO THE LEASES THAT THE CITY IS INVOLVED WITH.
WE HAVE NO CLUE WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THIS STUFF.
DO YOU HAVE ANY INPUT? ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THIS IN ANY CAPACITY?
COMMISSIONERS. >> AM I GOING OFF A CAFFEINATED LEDGE HERE?
>> IT IS 10:31. I APPRECIATE YOUR CAFFEINATION.
THE LANGUAGE OF WHAT THE AGREEMENT SAYS IS THAT IT MAY BE RENEWED AT FIVE YEAR INTER INTERVALS.
>> IT IS NOT AN OPTION TO RENEW. THOSE THINGS ARE HORRIFIC.
ONE PARTY IS NOT GOING TO AGREE. THEY'LL TRY TO EXTRACT SOMETHING FROM THE OTHER PARTY. I WILL STOP MY TANGENT ON THIS.
YOU UNDERSTAND MY CONCERN. LET'S WORK DILIGENTLY TO GET THE FIVE YEAR IN PLACE. MISS HEDGES IS SHOWING WHAT MY CONCERN WAS, THERE IS NOT AN OPTION TO RENEW. THIS IS AN DWREMT AGREEMENT TO HAVE AN DISCUSSION. MAYBE WE'LL GO ALONG WITH IT, MAYBE WE WON'T. WHATEVER THEY WANT TO DO WITH THAT PROPERTY, IT IS THEIR PROPERTY, WE'RE JUST A GUEST.
>> THE QUESTION WOULD BE THEN TO ME IS WHAT IS THE PRECEDENT THAT THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS IS DOING WITH OTHER COASTAL CITIES WITH PROPERTY THEY OWN? WHAT ARE THEY AFTER? AND SO SOMEONE KNOWS THAT ANSWER. THERE IS SOMETHING OUT THERE.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU KNOW. AND IF WE NEED TO MEET -- THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO UNDERSTAND.
SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE, THEY PUT THERE FOR A REASON, COMMISSIONER. SO SOMEHOW THEY'RE EXERCISING SOMETHING.
>> TO KEEP OUR TIMELINE SHORT. THEY'RE LOOKING TO KEEP US AS A TENANT UNDER CONTROL AND NOT HAVE A 25- YEAR AGREEMENT IN PLACE THEY CAN'T GET OUT OF. THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING
YOU'RE RIGHT. AND SO THANK YOU FOR BRINGING TO OUR ATTENTION BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T HAVE KNOWN THIS.
BUT NOW WE HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING, BUT I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU THAT WHAT EXTENDED NOW, WHAT MAKES SENSE NOW, BUT I THINK FOR US THAT AS WE UNDERSTAND THIS ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEER, SOMETHING IS GOING ON THERE. AND WE ALSO DEPEND ON THEM FOR THE DREDGING OF THE CHANNEL. SO WE GOT SOME REAL SENSITIVE STUFF GOING ON OUT THERE RIGHT NOW. I'M HEARING SOME THINGS ABOUT THAT AND THE CHANNELING AND WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE AND I HEARD FROM BUZZ AND THE REST OF THE GUYS.
WE HAVE TO BE A LITTLE SENSITIVE HERE BECAUSE WE DEPEND ON THAT AND DON'T WANT TO OPEN UP PANDORA'S BOX. THE WATER WAY IS VERY IMPORTANT.
AND WE DON'T NEED IT SHALLOWING OUT AND GET SLOWER RESPONSE TO GET OUR CHANNEL CLEARED.
I APPRECIATE YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS.
I WANT TO UNDERSTAND IT BETTER. I LOOK TO LEARN FROM STAFF AS WE MOVE FORWARD ON THIS.
>> JUST REAL QUICK. ARMY CORPS, IF YOU'RE LISTENING, WE STILL WANT TO PARTNER WITH YOU. WE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE TAKING YOUR TIME TO DO WHATEVER YOU GOT TO DO TO GET THIS CONTRACT. WE UNDERSTAND.
IT IS YOUR PROPERTY. AND WE WANTED TO CONTINUE OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SO, DON'T LET THAT GET TWISTED IN ANYTHING THAT IS SAID UP HERE. GREAT JOB MOVING THE TIMELINE TO GIVE US MORE TIME, MORE TIME SO WE WON'T BE WITHOUT OUR LICENSE AND THAT COULD HAVE CREATED A WHOLE DIFFERENT PROBLEM, YOU KNOW, BUT NOW WE AGREE, THEY AGREE, AND LET'S JUST GET IT DONE AND I'M FINE
[01:35:02]
RIGHT NOW. IF ALL THEY WANT TO GIVE US IS FIVE YEAR INTERVALS, I TAKE THOSE FIVE YEARS AND DEAL WITH FIVE YEARS DOWN THE ROAD. WHAT I DON'T WANT IS FOR SOMEBODY TO BE LISTENING IN A STATE -- THEY DON'T EVEN WANT TO DEAL WITH US. NOT SAYING THAT'S WHAT YOU SAID.>> I UNDERSTAND HOW THIS LANDLORD TENANT STUFF WORKS, CLEARLY. I UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY'RE UP TO. I KNOW THEIR STRATEGY AND WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO KEEP IN THEIR HAND.
I'M GOING TO SUGGEST, I'M NOT -- WE WANT THE PARK. WE DON'T NEED GUN PLACEMENTS OUT THERE TO PROTECT THE INLET FROM THE INCOMING INVASION OF XYZ. WE NEED THAT PARK FOR OUR CITIZENS USE. I AM GOIN TO SUGGEST WE GET SIX MONTHS INTO THIS ONE YEAR EXTENSION AND WE'RE NOT GETTING ANY COOPERATION. WE NEED THE HELP OF OUR CONGRESSMEN TO GET THIS F1 DONE.
IT IS A FEDERAL ISSUE. YOU HAVE TO LET US KNOW.
MR. CHESS, YOU HAVE TO LET US KNOW.
IF THIS IS GETTING STALLED, DON'T THINK THIS IS A LOCAL ISSUE WE CAN RESOLVE LOCALLY. IF WE NEED TO BRING IN MORE ASSETS, WE CAN DO
SO. >> I WOULDN'T SAY SIX MONTHS, I WOULD SAY IN THREE MONTHS.
>> 90 DAYS. NO MOVEMENT ON THIS FOR FIVE YEAR MEMORIALIZATION OF THE AGREEMENT, LET'S GET SOME HELP.
>> A MOTION AND A SECOND. CALL THE ROLL,
>> YES. >> COMMISSIONER JOHNSON.
>> OKAY, NEXT WE HAVE REZ SOLUTION 25- R 81, OF THE CITY
[A. Resolution 25-R81 adopting polling places for the January 13, 2026 Special Run-Off election.]
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE DESIGNATED PRECINCT POLLING PLACES IN THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE FOR THE SPECIAL RUNOFF ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 13TH, 2026 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.>> ANY QUESTIONS OF MISS COX ON THIS ITEM?
[B. Resolution 25-R83 appointing members to the Civil Service Appeals Board. ]
>> NEXT, RESOLUTION 25- R 83, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, CERTIFYING THE APPOINTMENT OR REAPPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE CIVIL SERVICE APPEALS BOARD AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THIS RESOLUTION WILL APPOINT STEVE DE PALMA AS A REPRESENTATIVE, COMMISSION APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVE. YOUR ALTERNATE HAS BECOME THE FINAL MEMBER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE APPEALS BOARD AND IS ALSO REAPPOINTS THEA MOORE, ONE OF THE PREVIOUS APPOINTEES, TIME FOR HER REAPPOINTMENT.
[A. Discussion of a proposed initiative to reduce review timelines for Single-Family, Duplex and Cottage planning applications within certain Zoning Districts.]
JOHNSON.>> NEXT A DISCUSSION ON A PROPOSED INITIATIVE TO REDUCE REVIEW TIMELINES FOR SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX AND COTTAGE PLANNING APPLICATIONS WITHIN CERTAIN ZONING DISTRICTS.
>> KEVIN FREEMAN, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING.
TODAY I THINK MY -- SORRY. THERE WE GO.
VERY SHORT PRESENTATION. VERY INTERESTING DISCUSSION, I HOPE. WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT HERE IS IN ESSENCE CONTINUATION FROM DIRECTION THAT WERE MADE DURING THIS STRATEGIC --
>> PUT YOUR -- PULL YOUR MIC CLOSER TO YOU, PLEASE.
>> THIS IS A CONTINUATION AND EXPANSION IN EFFECT OF A DISCUSSION THAT WE HAD DURING THE STRATEGIC PLAN EARLIER THIS YEAR. PART OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN WAS LOOKING AT GETTING -- MOVING FORWARD WITH AN OPTION FOR DEVELOPERS AND RESIDENTS TO OUR METHODOLOGY OF MOVING FORWARD WITH INFIELD DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. ONE OF THE IDEAS THAT STAFF HAD BEEN WORKING ON IS HOW DO WE GET A LOT OF THESE RESIDENTIAL LOTS, WHICH IS STILL VACANT AROUND THE CITY, INTO SOME USE.
THE INITIAL ALLOWANCES OF THOSE LOTS SHOWED US THAT THEY WERE PRIMARILY ZONED IN STRICTS R- 3 AND R-4. NOT ONLY WERE A LOT OF THOSE LOCATIONS WITHIN HISTORIC DISTRICTS, BUT THEY WERE ALSO
[01:40:06]
DIMENSIONED POTENTIALLY SUCH THAT IT MADE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS QUITE DIFFICULT ON PLANS THAT PEOPLE MOVING FORWARD WITH IN TERMS OF HOW THEY LOCATED THAT PROPERTY ON THOSE LOTS.SO WE LOOKED AT THAT AND WE ALSO WANTED TO LOOK AT THE TIMELINE IT WAS TAKING FOLKS TO GET THEIR APPLICATIONS THROUGH. BECAUSE OF THESE REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING, STORMWATER, PARKING AND ALL THE OTHER ASPECTS OF ZONING, AND THE HISTORIC DESIGNATIONS OF THESE LOTS, WE WERE FINDING THAT IT WAS TAKING FAR TOO LONG IN PROCESS, FAR TOO COMPLEX. IT WAS ALMOST BECOMING LIKE A MINI PLAN DEVELOPMENT THAT WE WERE MOVING THROUGH HERE.
SO, STAFF DID AN ANALYSIS, AND WE LOOKED AT WHAT ARE THE TYPICAL DIMENSIONS OF THOSE LOTS. AND WE FOUND QUITE CONSISTENT.
LOTS ARE IN CERTAIN DIMENSIONS, IN CERTAIN NEIGHBORHOODS. AND SO THERE IS AN OPTION THAT WE WANTED TO LOOK AT IN EARLY ITS OF CAN WE HAVE PREDESIGNED SITE PLANS THAT WERE ALREADY APPROVED BY THE BOARD, THAT WERE LOVE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, AND AND CITY PEOPLE INTERESTED IN DEVELOPING EITHER DEVELOPERS THEMSELVES OR RESIDENTS COULD TAKE OR OWNERS OF LOTS COULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS PREAPPROVED SYSTEM TO MOVE THROUGH PLANNING, KNOWING THAT THEY WERE ALREADY APPROVED. AND MOVING ON TO BUILDING AND WE ARE TALKING TO BUILDING ALSO ABOUT HOW CAN WE ACCELERATE THAT REVIEW OF THOSE PLANS THROUGH BUILDING, AND DIFFERENT TYPES OF REGULATIONS.
CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS. SO THE PLANS THAT WE'RE WORKING ON ARE INVITING ARCHITECTS TO PROVIDERS WITH SO THEY CAN MOVE ON AND HAVE THOSE PREAPPROVED BY CITY COMMISSION WOULD BE LOOKING AT MEETING CERTAIN DESIGN CRITERIA.
THOSE CRITERIA WOULD BE SET OUT AGAIN THROUGH THE PLANNING BOARD, THROUGH THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD, THROUGH CITY COMMISSION, AND FORM ALMOST A CATALOG OF PREAPPROVED DESIGN DRAWINGS.
AS PART OF THAT, REACHING OUT TO ARCHITECTS WHO HAVE DRAWN SUCCESSFULLY HAD HOUSING PROJECTS APPROVED IN THE CITY, AND ARCHITECTS OR ANYBODY WHO IS INTERESTED TO SUBMIT PLANS TO BE REVIEWED BY STAFF AND THEN MOVE ON TO REVIEW BY THE BOARDS, GET APPROVAL OF THOSE PLANS BY THE BOARDS AS A TARGET OR AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THOSE LOTS AND THEN HAVE THOSE PRODUCED BY THE ARCHITECTS AND AVAILABLE FOR PEOPLE TO NOT PURCHASE FROM THE CITY, BUT PURCHASE FROM THE ARCHITECTS THEMSELVES.
WE'RE NOT GETTING INVOLVED IN SELLING PLANS.
WE'RE NOT GETTING INVOLVED IN PROMOTING CERTAIN TYPES OF PLANS, BUT WE WANT TO PUT TOGETHER A PROPOSAL THAT HAS A CATALOG OF SUCCESSFULLY APPROVED PLANS THAT PEOPLE CAN THEN CONTACT THE ARCHITECTS INVOLVED WITH THOSE AND DO WHATEVER DEAL THEY NEED WITH THAT ARCHITECT TO GET HOLD OF THOSE DESIGN DRAWINGS WHEN THEY COME THROUGH TO REVIEW BY PLANNING, THEY CAN REFER TO THOSE PREAPPROVED DRAWINGS.
WE WILL THEN ENSURE THAT THEY WERE THE SAME DRAWINGS AS THE PREAPPROVED DRAWINGS AND WITHIN A MATTER OF A DAY OR TWO MOVE THOSE ON FOR APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. AND THAT WOULD ALLEVIATE PROCESS TIME BOTH THROUGH THE PLANNING REVIEW IN TERMS OF ZONING, BUT THEN PROCESS TIME THAT MAY BE REQUIRED IN TERMS OF MOVING THESE THROUGH TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OR PLANNING BOARD OR THE CITY COMMISSION. SO WE'RE HAVING DESIGNS THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS, EVERYBODY HAS SEEN, AND EVERYBODY HAS PREAPPROVED, AND THE APPLICANTS HAVE THAT CHOICE. IT DOESN'T PREVENT THEM HAVE THEIR OWN DESIGNS, BUT MOVING THROUGH THE PROCESS AS THEY WOULD NORMALLY DO. THIS IS AN INCENTIVE TO HAVE A
[01:45:03]
CATALOG OF DESIGNS THAT WE KNOW WE'RE GOING TO IMPROVE THE NEIGHBORHOODS, ARE GOING TO FORM A CHARACTERISTIC OF A NEIGHBORHOOD, THAT WE ALL WANT TO SEE MOVING FORWARD, AND IT ALSO AVOIDS THAT, WELL, I'LL SAY AVOIDS, BUT IT ALSO ADDRESSES THE STATE OVERVIEW OF DESIGN REGULATION OF SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX HOMES. WE'RE OFFERING -- WE'RE NOT SAYING YOU HAVE TO DO THIS, WE'RE NOT IMPOSING ZONING CRITERIA ON ANYBODY. THIS IS A CHOICE.THEY CAN MOVE THROUGH WITH THIS CHOICE AND THE BENEFIT OF MOVING THROUGH THIS CHOICE IS THEY GET A FASTER PROCESSING. SO IT IS A BONUS FOR BOTH THE CITY, IN TERMS OF KNOWING WHAT THEY'RE GETTING IN, AND THE APPLICANT WHO KNOWS THAT IF THEY MOVE ALONG THIS DIRECTION, STAFF ARE GOING TO APPROVE IT.
SO THAT'S THE PROPOSAL IS THIS, AND IT HAS BEEN -- I'VE SEEN IT DONE IN OTHER CITIES AND I'M TRYING TO GET HOLD OF EXAMPLES OF THAT.
NOT ESSENTIALLY CITIES IN FLORIDA AT THE MOMENT, SO THE ARCHITECTURAL STALES THEY'RE MOVING THROUGH WITH ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT.
WE NEED LOCAL ARCHITECTS AND WE NEED LOCAL DEVELOPERS AND WE NEED LOT OWNERS TO REACH OUT TO US ABOUT THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT THEY WANT TO SEE MOVING FORWARD.
AND IT WILL BE UP TO OUR BOARDS TO PREAPPROVE THOSE AND SAY WE CAN OFFER THOSE POTENTIALLY FOR CITIZENS AND EVERYBODY ELSE TOO.
>> SO THE GOAL IS TO INCENTIVIZE OUR INFILL LOTS.
>> THE GOEL AL HERE IS TO DO THAT.
>> AND THAT'S IN R-3 AND R-4 THAT IS SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE CITY OR IN MOSTLY CERTAIN AREAS?
>> IT IS MOSTLY WEST OF U.S. 1. IT IS MOSTLY WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS WITHIN THAT. AND I'M TALKING ABOUT LINCOLN
PARK, SOUTH OF ORANGE AVENUE. >> YES.
>> AND OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS THAT AREN'T NECESSARILY AFFECTED BY HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
WE DO HAVE THESE SIZED LOTS RUNNINGS THROUGH THE
CITY. >> OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE CITY?
>> YES. WE HAVE HISTORY THERE.
HAVING A ACCEPTABLE RANGE OF HOUSING DESIGNS THAT MEET THE CRITERIA OF WHAT THE -- THE COMMUNITY VIEW S S THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS IN A CERTAIN WAY. OFTEN WE'RE FIGHTING AGAINST THAT IN TERMS OF WHERE THE ZONING REGULATION TAKES US IN TERMS OF THE SETBACKS.
OR THE ELEMENTS OF THAT. IT GIVES THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD A BETTER OVERVIEW OF -- OR INSIGHT TO BOTH ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS, POTENTIAL, THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THE COMMUNITY AND WHAT THEY SEE THEY WANT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT COMMUNITY. THIS IS NOT SIDESTEPPING THE COMMUNITY. ALL THIS WILL BE DONE IN FULL VIEW. THIS IS RUNNING THROUGH BOARDS.
MY PROPOSAL HERE WOULD BE TO ENGAGE WITH THE COMMUNITIES AS THESE THINGS MOVE FORWARD. THERE WILL BE NUMEROUS PUBLIC HEARINGS, WHERE THESE THINGS ARE BOUGHT UP AND IT WON'T BE A SINGLE PUBLIC HEARING. THESE THINGS -- THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS COULD COME THROUGH ANY MOMENT, AND REQUEST REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE INTO THIS PROGRAM. THE ESSENTIAL THING HERE IS TO DEVELOP THE PROGRAM, ALLOW ARCHITECTS TO SUBMIT DESIGNS AND HAVE THEM REVIEWED THROUGH STAFF AND BOARDS AND THEN BE ACCEPTED AS THIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE WAY OF MOVING FORWARD WITH A PREAPPROVED REVIEW.
>> MAYOR, I HAVE SEVERAL COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.
DIRECTOR FREEMAN AND MYSELF HAD A MEETING TO DISCUSS THIS CONCEPT PREVIOUSLY.
COMMENT ONE IS WE'RE LOOKING TO PLACE THIS IN R- 3 AND R- 4,
[01:50:01]
WHY DON'T WE OPEN UP THE DISTRICTS TO SAY R- 3, R- 4, C- 1 AND INCLUDE ALL OF THESE? C-1 HAS A LOT OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN IT, INCLUDE ALL THE CLASSIFICATIONS TO HELP SPREAD THE CONCEPT HERE FURTHER.I THINK THAT WOULD REQUIRE OUR INITIATIVE TO DIRECT TO FREEMAN AND THAT WOULD BE AN INTELLIGENT CHANGE.
WHEN I MET WITH DIRECTOR FREEMAN, I USE THIS AS AN OFF THE SHELF PLAN. IF WE USE OFF THE SHELF PLANS THAT ARE BASICALLY PREPARED TO BE SUBMITTED TO BUILDING, YOU'RE INDICATING, DIRECTOR FREEMAN, THEY COME INTO PLANNING, DO THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE PLANNING BOARD AND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION OR THEY PREAPPROVED, YOU BROUGHT THEM ON TO SAY, THIS HOUSE WOULD BE GREAT IN THESE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS AND THESE PARTICULAR AREAS?
>> SO THEY WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SAY, YES, WE AGREE WITH THAT, PLANNING BOARD IS PRIOR APPROVAL, SO WE ELIMINATE 60 TO 90 DAYS OUT OF THE PROCESS JUST FROM THAT?
>> THAT'S A TRUE BENEFIT. PLANNING HAS THE CAPABILITY TO SAY, ARCHITECT X PROVIDED THIS PLAN, APPROVED BY PLANNING, EVEN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO SPEED THIS THROUGH, BECAUSE ALL THE TECHNICAL DATA PPROVED AS WELL. WE CAN GET LINKAGE TO SUGGEST THIS SHOULD BE AN ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS AS WELL THROUGH THEM. DO YOU AGREE?
>> THE DISCUSSION WE HAVE INTERNALLY IS HOW BEST TO DO THAT. IT COULD INVOLVE BUILDING AND ENGINEERING IF CERTAIN DEVELOPMENTS INCORPORATE REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER OR WHATEVER THAT IS. WE COULD DO ALL, WHATEVER RE WE REVIEW NOW IN ONE PACKAGE OFF THE SHELF.
>> I THINK THIS IS ANOTHER STEP IN INCENTIVIZING THE REHABILITATION OF THESE AREAS AND THESE INFILL LOTS WHICH ARE WHETHER WE REPORT THEM, THE HEAT MAP SHOWED, WE HAVE NEIGHBORHOODS WITH MAJORITY OF LOTS ARE VACANT. THIS MAY BE A WAY TO HELP INCENTIVIZE THAT. I KNOW THE SPECULATION MARKET ON LOTS IN THESE AREAS IS DRIVEN PRICES UP.
SO THERE IS ACTIVITY ON LOTS BEING BOUGHT AND SOLD BUT SYSTEM NOT A TON OF CONSTRUCTION.
PEOPLE ARE ALL CONTEMPLATING THE PROFIT TO BE MADE BY BUYING THE LOTS SAYING THE NEXT GUY WILL BUILD THE HOUSE. AT SOME POINT THAT WILL STOP, THAT UNDERLYING ACTIVITY WILL STOP AND CONSTRUCTION WILL START. IF WE CAN ENHANCE THIS PROCESS, ONE OF THE BIGGEST COMPLAINTS I RECEIVED IS THAT IT TAKES FOREVER TO GET A PERMIT.
AND ALL THE ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES, LOOKING AT SOFT COSTS OF $25,000 TO BUILD A HOUSE. IF WE CAN ELIMINATE THAT OR DOWNSIZE THAT, WE'LL NEVER ELIMINATE IT, BUT TO DOWNSIZE IT, AND SPEED UP THE PROCESS, I THINK THAT THAT'S GOING TO GET THE EYE OF POTENTIAL DEVELOPERS TO SAY, YES, WE WANT TO GET INVOLVED IN THE PROGRAM.
THINK IT IS A VERY, VERY POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT.
WE TALKED ABOUT THIS MONTHS AGO. I'M GLAD IT IS FINALLY IN FRONT OF US. I'M SUGGESTING EXPAND THE ZONING, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? ANY ZONING CLASSIFICATION, WE INCLUDE ALL THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS.
>> I CAN SEE THE BENEFIT OF THIS.
AND CERTAINLY I'LL START WITH THE LAST POINT IN MIND, YOU KNOW, I'VE GOT TO COME TO THE DEFENSE ABOUT THE E BEEN INVOLVED IN SOME SITUATIONS WHERE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE FOR THIS STUFF AND IT IS THE ARCHITECTS AND BUILDERS THAT DON'T SUBMIT STUFF AND CONTRACTORS THAT DON'T SUBMIT STUFF ON A TIMELY BASIS OR FORGOT THIS PIECE AND THEY GOT OTHER PROJECTS AND THEY FORGOT TO GET BACK TO THEM AND SO WHAT I WOULD SAY IS THAT THIS WOULD ELIMINATE THAT. BECAUSE RIGHT NOW ALL THE SPECS ARE IN. IT IS ALL THERE.
YOU COME IN AND SAY, I WANT TO GO WITH THIS DESIGN.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR, THOUGH, IF A PERSON CHOOSES A SET DESIGN, THEY WOULD THEN HAVE TO PURCHASE THAT DESIGN FROM THE ARCHITECT OR WHOEVER DESIGNED IT, CORRECT? SO, I DON'T WANT TO GET A COST SHIFT HERE, RIGHT? WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS ALSO MAKING SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE GOT A GOOD PLAN, BUT YOU KNOW WHERE I'M GOING. HOW DO WE PUT CONTROLS OR FACTORS INTO THAT? YOU'RE RIGHT, COMMISSIONER, WE HAVE AREAS THROUGHOUT THE CITY THAT PEOPLE ARE JUST SITTING ON LAND WAITING. AND SO, THIS WILL SPEED THAT ALONG. ACTUALLY GET A HOUSE WITH ASSESSED VALUE THERE THAT NOW BRINGS INTO THAT, WHICH IS A POSITIVE THING, I THINK.
HOW DO WE AVOID THAT, MR. FREEMAN? WE NEED SOME TYPE OF STRUCTURE.
>> IT IS A GOOD POINT. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY CONTROL OVER IT. I THINK --
[01:55:01]
>> YEAH. I DON'T THINK WE WANT ANY CONTROL OVER THAT. THEN WE'RE -- I THINK THAT WOULD BE A DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS OR A DIFFERENT --
>> COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, IF WE HAVE MULTIPLE FIRMS THAT ARE PROVIDING THE PREPACKAGED PLANS, THE MARKET, THE CAPITALIST MARKET SETS THE PRICE.
IF YOU'RE CHARGING $15,000 AND I SAY I'LL TELL 20 SETS, I CAN CHARGE 7500 BUCKS OR $5,000, THE MARKET IS GOING TO ADJUST ACCORDINGLY TO SET THE PRICE.
WE DON'T HAVE ONE SUPPLIER, SO IT IS NOT AN ISSUE JUST ONE SUPPLIER. WE COULD HAVE HALF A
DOZEN. >> IT IS MANY SUPPLIERS BASED EN THEIR APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE. AND SO THAT'S THE POINT TOO, IS THAT, YOU KNOW, WE GOT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE ENCOURAGING AND WE MAY BE TRYING TO FIX THIS THING BEFORE WE GET HERE, I'M JUST SAYING THAT, YOU'RE RIGHT, THE MARKET WILL DICTATE.
>> I DON'T WANT TO SEE PEOPLE GETTING GOUGED FOR BUYING PREPACKAGED PLANS.
>> I AGREE. I THINK THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM, IF THEY SEE A PROFIT MARGIN, THEY'RE GOING TO DO THAT. THEIR COMPETITION CHARGES
$2500. >> THERE IS NOTHING SAYING THEY HAVE TO GO WITH THIS.
THIS IS A SUGGESTION, TO MAKE THE BURDEN A LITTLE LESS AND EXPEDITE THIS TIME, IT GIVES DEVELOPERS A WAY TO BE -- AND BUILDERS A BETTER SENSE OF GETTING THINGS DONE FASTER. WHICH IS WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO AND ATTENUATE. I THINK ONE OTHER FACTOR THAT I WOULD LIMIT INTO THIS, THAT I WANT TO UNDERSTAND FROM STAFF TOO, WE HAVE SOME SPECIAL AREAS IN THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE, A LOT OF US IN THE FPRA. MAYBE THERE IS SOME FACTORS THERE THAT MAYBE WE ALLOW CAPITALIZATION COME IN, BUT MAYBE IN THIS FPRA, BECAUSE THAT'S REALLY A LARGE PART OF OUR HISTORIC DISTRICT, THAT WE HAVE SOME CAPS ON THIS, AND WE HAVE SOME PARAMETERS AND MAYBE THIS COMES OUT IN THE RFP PROCESS, BUT THERE WILL BE THINGS I'M LOOKING FOR BECAUSE WHAT I DON'T WANT IS THAT WE HAVE HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOODS THAT HAVE CERTAIN STRUCTURE, YOU GO THROUGHOUT LINCOLN PARK AND YOU CAN TELL IT WAS ONE BUILDER, ALL OF THEM ARE CONCRETE CINDER BLOCK HOUSES WE HAVE BEEN LIVING IN AND SQUARE AND BEEN THERE FOR A LONG TIME AND THEY BUILT THIS HOUSE AND WENT ALL THE WAY DOWN THE BLOCK AND ALL OF OUR HOUSES LOOK ALIKE, RIGHT? WHAT I DON'T WANT IS HERE IS SOMETHING MODERN SLEEK THAT DOESN'T FIT THE CHARACTER.
WE GOT STUFF GOING ON AND EVERYBODY IS -- I'M OKAY WITH THAT. BUT YOU SEE WHERE I'M GOING, THAT THE DESIGN STANDARDS, I WANT TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE REALLY FITTING SOME OF THESE NEIGHBORHOODS AND EVEN LIFTING SOME OF THE VALUE OF THESE HISTORIC HOUSES THAT HAVE BEEN THERE SINCE THE '50S AND '40S THAT PEOPLE MAINTAINED. I LIKE THE PROCESS. DON'T GET ME WRONG.
I THINK THIS MAKES FOR A GREAT DISCUSSION.
I LIKE THAT WE'LL HAVE THE COMMUNITY TO BE ABLE TO CONTRIBUTE AND BE A PART OF THIS ON THESE BOARDS AND REALLY HELP VISIONING OUT WHERE WE'RE GOING TO GO WITH THIS.
>> I UNDERSTAND. ESSENTIALLY THE PROCESS THAT WE GO THROUGH WOULD ALLOCATE WHICH DESIGNS WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE IN WHICH AREAS.
YOU MAY HAVE BEEN COLOR CODED IN TERMS OF RED, GREEN AND BLUE OROR DESIGNS ARE ACCEPTABLE IN LINCOLN PARK, FOR EXAMPLE. YOU WOULD CATEGORIZE THEM AS THEY WERE BEING APPROVED INTERNAL TO THE PROCESS.
AND THAT WOULD BE -- THAT CATEGORIZATION WOULD BE MADE BY THE BOARDS.
>> REAL QUICK. DIRECTOR FREEMAN, YOU KNOW WHERE I STAND ON THIS. WE TALKED ABOUT THIS SEVERAL TIMES. BUT I'M GOING TO, ONE THING I'M WORRIED ABOUT IS WHAT MY FELLOW COMMISSIONER SAYS. IF WE GET A SET OF PLANS, AND WE STAMP IT AS GOOD TO GO, AS YOU SAY, OFF THE SHELF, THAT MEANS NO HISTORIC BOARD, NO PLANNING BOARD, IT IS GOOD TO GO, AND THE ARCHITECT COMES IN, I'M JUST CURIOUS, MAYBE THIS IS A QUESTION FOR LEGAL OR SOMEBODY, IF WE GET ONE OF THOSE PLANS AND WE SEND IT THROUGH ALL OUR DEPARTMENTS, WHY CAN'T FPRA OR SOMEBODY BUY THAT DESIGN? IT IS OUR CATALOG. IT IS THE CITY -- IT IS THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE CATALOG. IF WE GET OUR ARCHITECT DESIGN THAT EVERYBODY IS APPROVED, WHY CAN'T WE BUY THAT -- BUY THAT DESIGN AND PUT IT IN OUR CATALOG AND THE BUILDING -- THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, THEY CAN PUT -- I'M JUST THROWING IT OUT THERE, I KNOW ME AND YOU HAVE THE DISCUSSION, I DON'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING ILLEGAL, BUT IF WE SEND IT THROUGH ALL OF OUR PLANNING BOARDS, ALL OUR DEPARTMENTS, AND WE STAMP IT AS GOOD TO GO, WHY
[02:00:01]
CAN'T WE MAKE IT OURS AND PUT IT IN OUR CATALOG SO I DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT NOW I GOT THIS STEP, DRAWING OUT HERE IN THE PUBLIC, AND WE GOT THESE PEOPLE CHARGING BECAUSE IT IS GOING TO DEFEAT THE PROCESS IF SOMEONE CAN'T PAY THE ARCHITECT'S PRICE TO GET IN. I'M JUST THROWING IT OUT THERE.WE'RE IN THE EARLY STAGES AND LEGAL, I WOULD LOVE FOR YOU TO LOOK INTO IT, BUT IF WE GET ONE, AND IT GOES TO EVERYTHING AND WE SAY THIS IS GOOD TO GO, IT IS GOING IN OUR CATALOG, WHY CAN'T THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE OR WHY CAN'T FPRA OR SOMEBODY SAY THIS IS OUR DESIGN NOW AND WE DEAL WITH IT THAT WAY TO ALLEVIATE ALL OF THE CONCERNS THAT I HAVE FROM THE LEFT? THAT'S NOT MY AREA. THAT'S YOUR AREA DOWN THERE.
I'M JUST SAYING, BUT I'M JUST SAYING, SINCE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IT, WHAT I DON'T WANT TO DO IS GIVE A DESIGN, THE GREEN LIGHT.
I DON'T -- I DON'T KNOW HOW I FEEL ABOUT THAT.
>> I DON'T THINK YOU'RE SUGGESTING
FREE. >> NO, I'M NOT SUGGESTING FREE.
OH, NO. NO, I'M NOT SUGGESTING FREE.
>> I THINK IT'S A VERY -- I JUST COMMISSIONED A SET OF PLANS RECENTLY, AND THE PLANS, WHEN I'M SAID AND DONE, THIS IS FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE $30,000 INTO PLANS, PLANS.
I'M GOING TO HAVE A ROLL OF PLANS FOR 30 GRAND WHEN IT'S SAID AND DONE. HAVING HAD SAID THAT, I RESPECT COMMISSIONER FREEMAN'S POINT ON THAT, BUT COMMISSIONER GAINES, YOU HAVE A VERY VALID POINT.
WE COULD SELECT SEVERAL VENDORS POTENTIALLY AND HAVE PLANS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS TRYING TO CREATE, THEN WE OWN THIS CATALOG.
I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU A VERY SIMILAR -- IT'S NOT REALLY A SIMILAR SAMPLE TO THIS.
FROM THE BOARD PERSPECTIVE, HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD, WE HAD MANY REQUESTS FOR FENCES.
WE CAME UP WITH A CATALOG OF FENCES THAT WERE PREAPPROVED.
YOU COULD DO THIS FENCE, THIS FENCE, THIS FENCE.
NONE OF THEM WERE CHAIN LINKED, NONE OF THEM WERE THIS -- TO GET TO -- I THINK IT HAS A VERY VALIDĆ·Ć·VALID POINT.
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE RESEARCH WITH THAT.
THERE COULD BE MORE ENTANGLEMENTS WITH THAT.
I WASN'T SUGGESTING FREE. IF WE GO THROUGH ALL THIS PROCESS AND WE GO THROUGH ALL THIS TIME AND WE'RE PAYING ALL THESE -- ALL OUR DEPARTMENTS -- SO, YOU'VE GOT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. YOU'VE GOT PLANNING.
YOU'VE GOT BUILDING. YOU'VE GOT STORAGE.
YOU'VE GOT FPUA COMING IN TO DO WHATEVER. EVERYBODY IS LOOKING AT THIS AND WE SAY, YES, LET'S GET THAT DESIGN.
IT'S OURS NOW. LET'S GET THAT DESIGN, AND WE PUT IT IN OUR
CATALOG. >> IT COMES AT A STANDARD COST IS WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
>> JUST A STANDARD COST. WHAT WE DON'T WANT IS HAVE ALL THESE GUYS IN A CATALOG AND DEVELOPERS HAVE TO GO OUTSIDE TO THESE ARCHITECTS AND THESE ARCHITECTS CHARGE SO MUCH MONEY THAT THE -- IS STILL EMPTY.
>> RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO AVOID.
>> THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO AVOID.
>> RIGHT. WE DISCOUNT THE PRICE AND THINK WE'RE GOING TO SELL NUMEROUS SETS OF THESE.
>> THIS IS IT. THIS IS OUR FEES, WE GO THROUGH.
>> EVERY HOW IS GOING TO HAVE DIFFERENTIATION AS TO WHERE THE DRIVEWAY IS COMING FROM, THE WATER LINE, THE SEWER LINE. ALL THAT IS PART OF THE PROCESS.
THEY HAVE TO GO BACK TO ARCHITECT ONE AND SAY, I NEED A -- FOR THIS PLAN. I WAS TOLD CHANGES NEED TO BE MADE TO THAT PLAN. I'VE GOT TO COME BACK TO YOU.
THAT'S THE WAY IT SHOULD WORK. WE'RE NOT GOING TO DEAL WITH THAT INTERNALLY. WE COULD REALLY MAKE THIS AN AFFORDABILITY THING. TO COMMISSIONER JOHNSON'S COMMENT THAT PEOPLE ARE LAND BANKING. I KNOW THAT FOR A FACT BECAUSE MY COMPANY IS DOG IT. ARE WE BUILDING ANYTHING RIGHT NOW? ARE WE PLANNING, WAITING FOR A COMPANY TO COME FORWARD?
POSSIBLY. >> WE'RE ASKING FOR THAT TO BE INVESTIGATED AND THOUGHT THROUGH, I THINK.
[02:05:01]
BUT I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ASK YOU ON THE IDEA OF EXPANDING IT TO THESE OTHER ZONING -- DID YOU HAVE A REASON FOR JUST LIMITING IT?>> NOT -- I THINK THE REASONING BEHIND THAT WAS TO TRY AND SIMPLIFY AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
>> OR MAYBE YOU WERE DOING A TRIAL MAYBE OR SOMETHING?
>> THE COMBINATION OF THOUGHT PROCESSES.
WE DO HAVE VACANT LOTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
IT IS AN ISSUE THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
>> SO, THERE IS NO REAL OBJECTION TO EXPANDING IT TO THESE OTHER --
>> BROADEN THE RANGE OF LOTS. WHAT WE TRY TO DO IS SAY, OKAY, MAKE IT EASY FOR THE ARCHITECT OR THE DESIGNER TO SAY, LOOK AT THOSE SIZE LOTS.
AND WE KNOW THOSE DESIGNS WILL FIT ON THOSE SIZE LOTS.
>> YOU HAVE TO START SOMEPLACE
ALSO. >> I THINK WHAT HELPS IS WHEN WE HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING, THE CITY BOUNDARIES, WHAT'S AVAILABLE IN EACH CATEGORY -- IF YOU CAN SAY C1, WE HAVE POTENTIALLY THIS OR
A MAP. >> -- OR EVEN A MAP, SOMETHING TO GIVE US A PICTURE.
>> I DO KNOW THERE ARE HUNDREDS.
>> SO, THERE'S NO ACTION ON THIS.
YOU JUST WANTED OUR INPUT, IS THAT CORRECT?
>> PRECISELY WHAT I NEEDED, MADAM MAYOR.
AND I GOT EXACTLY WHAT I NEEDED.
>> I WILL GET WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY.
I'LL GET WITH THE INTERNAL DEPARTMENTS AND WE'LL COME BACK. IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE PROBABLY MOVING FORWARD WITH AN RFP- TYPE INITIATIVE WITH THIS, WORKING OUT POTENTIAL FUNDING, WORKING OUT HOW THAT IS DEALT WITH THROUGH THE PURCHASING PROCESS OF INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY WITH THE ARCHITECTS.
AND THAT RFP WILL BE -- WILL NEED TO BE REALLY WELL DEFINED IN TERMS OF PROTECTION ON THE POTENTIAL PRICING POINTS FOR THESE PLANS FOR ANYBODY WHO WANTS TO USE THIS PROGRAM.
[B. Comprehensive City Economic Development Overview Presentation, Discussion and Direction]
GOOD. I THINK WE CAN MOVE ON TO THE NEXT TOPIC.>> OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE COMPREHENSIVE CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION, AND DIRECTION.
>> DO YOU HAVE A LEAD- IN TO THIS?
>> -- >> CHEYENNE -- FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. MADAM MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THANK YOU FOR HAVING US. THIS ITEM IS COMING BEFORE YOU DIRECTLY FROM THE CITY'S STRATEGIC PLAN. IT WAS REQUESTED THAT WE PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON, KIND OF, OUR COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS THAT ARE UNDERWAY AS WELL AS HOW WE INCORPORATE THAT INTO A POTENTIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT IN OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT'S A MOUTHFUL, BUT IT'S A TWO- PART PRESENTATION.
BASICALLY I WANT TO GO THROUGH, KIND OF, WHERE WE ARE TODAY, WHAT ARE OUR CURRENT CONDITIONS IN FORT PIERCE, WHAT ARE OUR PROGRAMS AND INITIATIVES, AGAIN, THAT ARE UNDERWAY. AND WHAT ARE OUR PRIORITIES MOVING FORWARD? WE HAVE A LOT OF PRIORITIES, AND LET'S PRIORITIZE THEM.
THIS IS BASICALLY A FOUNDATION FOR DISCUSSION POINTS AND, KIND OF, HIGH LEVEL. SO, CURRENT CONDITIONS.
THIS IS COMING FROM A REPORT FROM THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, ONE OF OUR PARTNERS THAT I'LL SPEAK ABOUT IN A MOMENT. WE HAVE A DIVERSIFIED BUT TRANSITIONING ECONOMY HERE IN FORT PIERCE.
WE ARE SHIFTING FROM OUR HISTORIC CITRUS AND FISHING ROUTES IN COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY RELATED TO THE WATERFRONT MORE SO TO A MIXED ECONOMY ANCHORED BY HEALTH CARE, GOVERNMENT, MARINE MANUFACTURING, EDUCATION, TOURISM, AND OF COURSE RETAIL. WE ARE VERY FORTUNATE TO HAVE OUR LOCAL ANCHOR WORKFORCE EMPLOYERS, LIKE OUR INSTITUTIONAL EMPLOYERS -- AND MANUFACTURING FIRMS THAT ARE COMING ONLINE NOW. OUR OPPORTUNITIES ARE REALLY ALL CENTERED AROUND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVING THE WAGES AND THE OPPORTUNITIES HERE FOR FOLKS TO NOT HAVE TO OUT- COMMUTE OUTSIDE OF OUR COMMUNITY AND REALLY SHIFTING AWAY FROM THOSE SERVICE SECTOR RETAIL JOBS THAT I SPOKE ABOUT IN THE FIRST POINT INTO MORE OF THESE HIGH- LEVEL WAGES AND OPPORTUNITIES. LOOKING AT OUR STRATEGIC GROWTH AREAS, OF COURSE YOU GUYS KNOW OUR DOWNTOWN WITH OUR DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN THAT WAS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED IN OUR STRATEGIC PLAN, LOOKING AT LINCOLN PARK, WE HAVE A MASTER PLAN UNDERWAY FOR THAT AS WELL AS THE AVENUE D RECONSTRUCTION. OUR KING'S HIGHWAY RECONSTRUCTION IS IMPORTANT RIGHT NOW, AS WELL AS OUR AGING CORRIDORS.
THEY HAVE THE GREATEST POTENTIAL FOR REDEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS JOB CREATION. THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL IS OUR PREMIER PARTNER FOR DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES.
THEY HANDLE BUSINESS ATTRACTION, EXPANSION, AND --
[02:10:02]
THEY HAVE A PLETHORA OF OPPORTUNITIES TO REALLY BRIDGE THAT SKILLS GAP THAT I SPOKE ABOUT BEFORE.THEY HAVE THE NEW TCC PROGRAM. IF YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ABOUT THAT, IT'S REALLY EXCITING. THEY HELP US WITH RESEARCH AND DATA AND OF COURSE ADVOCACY. WE ALSO WORK WITH A SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, AND CAREER SOURCE FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT. OUR FORT PIERCE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -- THAT'S YOU ALL -- THEY PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE IN ADVANCING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
OF COURSE CATALYZING PRIVATE INVESTMENT THROUGH GRANTS, IMPACT FEE MORATORIUM, INFIELD LEAN REDUCTION PROGRAM, ANY TYPE OF EXCITEMENT THAT WE CAN GENERATE TO ENCOURAGE NEW DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE OF OUR GREEN-FILLED AREAS AND BACK INTO OUR URBAN CORE, DELIVERING CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE. WE HAVE STREET INFRASTRUCTURE, UTILITIES UNDERWAY RIGHT NOW WITH -- RIVER DRIVE, AVENUE D, I ALREADY MENTIONED.
WE HELP WITH PARKING CONSTRUCTION, ANYTHING THAT IS GOING TO HELP UNLOCK DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS GROWTH.
WE ALSO CREATE VIBRANT AND ATTRACTIVE DISTRICTS.
MAYBE THAT'S THROUGH OUR MURAL PROGRAMS. ALL OF THIS -- AND THAT'S WHAT I'M GETTING AT WITH THIS SLIDE -- IS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IS WOVEN INTO EVERYTHING WE DO. EVERY DEPARTMENT PLAYS A ROLE FROM PERMITTING TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN. SO, IT'S NOT JUST ONE DEPARTMENT OR PERSON FOCUSING ON THAT.
WE ALL PLAY A ROLE. AND WE'RE REALLY JUST PAVING THE WAY TO ENCOURAGE THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT AS WE MOVE FORWARD IN ACTIVATING THESE UNDER- UTILIZED PROPERTIES. IT'S PERFECT SEGUE FROM WHAT KEV WAS TALKING ABOUT. WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR SO LONG AND HOW DO WE ENCOURAGE INFIELD DEVELOPMENT IN OUR URBAN CORE. INCENTIVE TOOL KIT. SO, WE HAVE LOCAL AND STATE AND REGIONAL INCENTIVES. OUR LOCAL PROGRAMS, YOU ALL KNOW WE HAVE BEEN VERY TARGETED. WE HAVE BEEN VERY BUDGET NEUTRAL IN WHAT WE OFFER FOR DEVELOPMENT.
THEY ARE CALLED WHAT YOU -- BUT FOR.
THESE ARE INCENTIVES THAT WOULD NOT EXIST UNLESS THE BUSINESS COMES AND GENERATES THAT TAX REVENUE AND JOBS AND ALL THOSE THINGS. TAX ABATEMENT -- EXPEDITED PERMITTING OPPORTUNITIES AS WELL AS INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT AND THE FPRA TOOLS THAT I JUST MENTIONED.
OUR STATE AND REGIONAL -- I'M SURE THERE'S A LONGER LIST THAN THAT. I JUST CAPTURED THOSE.
THAT IS REALLY CHANNELLED THROUGH OUR LIAISON WITH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL AND MAKING SURE FORT PIERCE REMAINS COMPETITIVE WHEN WE ARE PUT AGAINST OTHER COMMUNITIES WHO ARE LOOKING FOR THE SAME TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH. AND OUR PRIORITIES MOVING FORWARD -- THIS IS REALLY THE DISCUSSION POINT FOR TODAY FROM OUR STRATEGIC PLAN. THESE ARE ALL DIFFERENT TOPICS THAT HAVE COME FROM MEETINGS, COME FROM PLAN REPORTS, COME FROM THE STRATEGIC PLAN AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. SO, THE JOBS CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT IS NUMBER ONE.
I KNOW YOU PRIORITIZE THAT EXTREMELY HIGH THROUGHOUT THE STRATEGIC PLAN, AND WE ARE MOVING INTO PHASE TWO OF THE KINGS HIGHWAY JOBS CORRIDOR STUDY. THAT'S COMING YOUR WAY PRETTY SOON.
THEY'RE DOING AN EXCELLENT JOB. I THINK THIS IS GOING TO REALLY OPEN THE DOOR TO LOOK AT NOT JUST KINGS AVENUE BUT OTHERS IN OUR COMMUNITY. DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION. THAT WAS ALSO IN OUR STRATEGIC PLAN, RANKED HIGHLY. WE DID THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN A FEW YEARS AGO AND NOW IT'S REALLY ABOUT ADVANCING THOSE PROJECTS AND GETTING THEM INTO CONSTRUCTION WHERE WE CAN START TO SEE THIS PHYSICAL GROWTH. LINCOLN PARK INVESTMENT. AGAIN, THE MASTER PLAN IS UNDERWAY NOW. WE LOOK FORWARD TO THOSE COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS COMING IN JANUARY AND FEBRUARY. THIS IS VERY CRITICAL.
I MEAN, TYPICALLY PRIVATE INVESTMENT FOLLOWS PUBLIC INVESTMENT. WHAT ARE THOSE INVESTMENTS, AND WHY IS THAT NOT OCCURRING? HOW CAN WE MAKE SURE THAT WE DO THAT? PORTO FORT PIERCE GROWTH, STRENGTHENING OUR FRIENDSHIP WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY -- AS WELL AS QUALITY OF LIFE WITH THE HARBOR POINT PARK BOAT RAMP AND PARK ITSELF.
SMALL BUSINESS SUPPORT. YOU KNOW OUR SMALL BUSINESSES ARE THE BACKBONE OF OUR COMMUNITY.
THAT IS WHAT GIVES FORT PIERCE THE CHARM AND THE UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES THAT WE OFFER HERE.
SO, HOW CAN WE BETTER SUPPORT OUR SMALL BUSINESSES? WHAT ARE THE NEEDS OF OUR SMALL BUSINESSES? WE'LL BE LAUNCHING A SURVEY SOON TO REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT THOSE ARE SO WE DON'T SPEAK FOR THEM AND OFFER PROGRAMS THAT ARE NOT BEING TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF.
WORKFORCE HOUSING. THAT CAME UP IN A FEW PRESENTATIONS TODAY. THAT IS CRITICAL.
IF WE'RE GOING TO ENTICE THESE JOBS TO COME, WHERE IS THE WORKFORCE GOING TO LIVE? SO, PUBLIC- PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS, PROPERTY ACQUISITION.
WE HAVE TWO, SUNRISE VILLAGE AS WELL AS AVENUE D BLOCK THAT ARE GOING TO BE BREAKING GROUND PRETTY SOON. BUT WHAT CAN WE DO TO ENCOURAGE THAT. NOT JUST LOW INCOME, A MIX OF INCOMES, AND MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE SUPPORTING EVERYONE.
FINALLY TOURISM AND BRANDING. THAT CAME FROM THE
[02:15:01]
STRATEGIC PLAN AS WELL. WE TALK A LOT ABOUT OUR PERCEPTION IN FORT PIERCE AND HOW COULD WE IMPROVE THAT AND HOW DO WE ALL WORK TOGETHER TO ACCOMPLISH THAT.SO, WHY IS YOURS LIKE THAT? SO, I'M GOING TO TRANSITION OVER TO KEV.
WE'LL TALK ABOUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENT. I DON'T KNOW WHY THAT'S LIKE THAT. .
>> COMMISSIONERS, MADAM MAYOR, PLANNING DIRECTOR.
CHEYENNE HAS JUST GONE THROUGH THE WHERE WE ARE IN TERMS OF WHO WE RELY ON, WHERE OUR STRATEGIC GOALS ARE, WHAT WE'VE HEARD FROM CITY COMMISSION, WHAT WE'RE WORKING ON INTERNALLY, MANY DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF HOW WE'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE WITHIN THE CITY. THAT'S ALL BEING DONE OUTSIDE OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THOUGH.
AT THE MOMENT WE DO NOT HAVE AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND PART OF THE STRATEGIC DISCUSSION THAT WE HAD EARLIER THIS YEAR WAS THAT WE NEED TO GET SOMETHING IN THERE.
NOW, WHAT WE'RE WORKING ON AT THE MOMENT IS AN UPDATE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUIRES UPDATE. AND THAT'S A STATE REQUIREMENT THAT WE HAVE.
AND THAT'S DONE EVERY SEVEN YEARS.
SO, WE'RE COMING UP TO THE FULFILLMENT OF THAT.
AND IN JANUARY, YOU'LL GET TO SEE THE PROPOSALS FOR THAT.
IN ESSENCE, THAT UPDATE IS DONE TO ENSURE THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS STILL IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. IT'S STILL RELEVANT TO OUR LOCAL CONDITIONS. ALL THE CONDITIONS THAT CHEYENNE MENTIONED EARLIER, WE NEED TO HAVE THOSE ENGAGED WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE NEED TO HAVE THE CORRECT POLICY ALIGNMENTS. WE NEED TO HAVE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT. THAT'S BEEN DONE.
WE'VE HAD OUTREACH FOR THIS REVISED UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE REVISED UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WILL NOT, AT THE MOMENT, HAVE THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT.
WHAT WE WILL BE WORKING ON IS THE DATA COLLECTION FOR THAT ELEMENT. SO, THE NEXT SLIDE WE'LL GO INTO THAT. EVERYTHING AGAIN THAT CHEYENNE'S MENTIONED, ALL THOSE THINGS THAT ARE -- WHAT ARE THE BASELINE CONDITIONS, WHO WE'RE WORKING WITH, WHAT ARE OUR STRATEGY PROPRIETIES ARE, WHAT ARE OUR EXISTING PROGRAMS ARE.
THEY NEED TO BE WRAPPED INTO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT. AND WE NEED THAT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE TO ACT AS A FOUNDATION OF HOW THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT IS FORMED OUT.
WE KNOW THE PIECES. WE NEED MORE DATA ON THOSE THINGS. THE STATE WILL REQUEST US TO PROVIDE ALL THE DATA AND ANALYSIS FOR POLICIES OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE PUT INTO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT. EVERYTHING THAT CHEYENNE'S MENTIONED JUST EARLIER IS TO PROMOTE A DIVERSIFIED, RESILIENT COMMUNITY. AND FROM THE PRESENTATION
[02:20:01]
WE HEARD THIS MORNING, THERE MAY BE POLICIES FROM THE RESILIENCY STUDY THAT'S BEING DONE THAT MAY BE ABLE TO BE INCORPORATED WITHIN THIS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT. LOTS OF PIECES IN PLACE.WE'RE JUGGLING LOTS OF BALLS HERE IN TERMS OF GETTING EVERYTHING ALIGNED. BUT WE'RE ON A PROGRAM WHERE WE HAVE ALL THE PIECES IN PLACE. THE FOUNDATION WILL BE IN PLACE EARLY NEXT YEAR. THE DISCUSSION, STRATEGIC PLAN, WILL BE IN PLACE EARLY NEXT YEAR. WE WILL BE THEN ABLE TO LOOK AT THE DATA AND ANALYSIS AND MOVE ON TO THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. ALL THOSE DIFFERENT THINGS COME INTO PLAY. I'M JUST REITERATING WHAT CHEYENNE SAID REALLY EARLIER. THE POLICIES THEMSELVES WILL BE HOW THESE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES MOVE FORWARD. WE HAVE TO HAVE THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES TO GET TO THE CORRECT POLICIES POLICIES. THEY HAVE TO BE INTERTWINED.
FROM THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES TO THE POLICIES IS HOW DO WE IMPLEMENT AND ENSURE THAT THESE POLICIES ARE IMPLEMENT ED? AND I THINK ONE THING THE CITY HAS FAILED ON OVER THE PREVIOUS YEARS IS HAD THE CORRECT MEASURABLE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT WE REVIEW ON A REGULAR BASIS.
SOMETHING THAT'S NOT OVER- BURDENSOME TO GENERATE THAT DATA OR MONITOR THAT DATA.
BUT ONCE WE'RE AWARE OF WHAT WE SHOULD BE MONITORING, WE NEED TO HAVE PROCESSES IN PLACE TO CREATE THAT REPORT. THEN ANNUALLY THAT SHOULD BE BROUGHT BACK TO CITY COMMISSION TO ANALYZE HOW WE'RE DOING ON THESE THINGS.
WE NEED TO DO -- WE NEED TO SHOW HOW THE POLICIES CAN AFFECT THE PURSUANT -- PURSUANT -- ANYWAY, GRANTS AND FEDERAL FUNDING. AGAIN, WE HEARD THE RESILIENCE PRESENTATION THIS MORNING. HAVING SOMETHING IN PLACE, HAVING A POLICY IN PLACE, HAVING DATA IN PLACE, HAVING A PLAN IN PLACE, GETS YOU ADDITIONAL GROUND WHEN YOU APPLY FOR GRANTS.
GRANTS ARE ALWAYS VERY PRECISE IN WHAT THEY'RE EXPECTING, VERY PRECISE IN WHAT POINTS AWARD YOU GET, AND YOU'RE RANKED AGAINST OTHER PLAYERS IN THE GRAND ARENA AGAINST HOW MUCH POINTS YOU CAN GENERATE.
AND A LOT OF THAT IS DONE ON THE WORK YOU'VE ALREADY DONE.
HOW DO WE GET PUBLIC- PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS GOING? AND I THINK THAT'S AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
IT'S A MISSING PIECE OF OUR TALK.
IT'S A MISSING PIECE THAT WE DON'T PUSH ENOUGH.
AND IT'S DONE IN OTHER LOCATIONS.
IT CAN BE DONE IN A WAY THAT BENEFITS THE CITY.
AND AGAIN, SETTING THE RIGHT FOR THAT WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, ESSENTIAL TO ANY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT.
I MENTIONED IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING HOW THAT'S DONE. YOU KNOW THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS A TEN- YEAR PERIOD. NOT ONLY SHOULD WE HAVE AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS BEING PRESENTED AND BEING MONITORED. AND IF THERE ARE CHANGES NEEDED, WE CAN GO IN AND MAKE THOSE CHANGES. WE SHOULDN'T BE WAITING FOR THE 10- YEAR REVIEW PERIOD TO DO THAT. AND TO HELP US DO THAT EVEN MORE IS HAVE A MIDTERM REVIEW OF HOW THIS IS WORKING.
SO, NOT ONLY YOU HAVE AN ANNUAL UPDATE, YOU HAVE THE MIDTERM REPORT, WHICH THEN MAY DIRECT CHANGES TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT OR OTHER PARTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
AND AGAIN, WE ARE JUST POLICIES BASED ON CHANGING MARKET CONDITIONS, WHICH WILL HAPPEN DURING THE 10- YEAR CYCLE.
AND AGAIN, WE'RE NOT HAD BEING PROACTIVE ENOUGH IN MONITORING THOSE AND MAKING AMENDMENTS TO OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AFFECTS THE ZONING, IS THE UNDERLYING FOUNDATION FOR ZONING. AND THAT WOULD ALLOW US THEN TO ENGAGE WITH A -- I WOULD BE LOOKING FOR AN OVERALL OF ALL OUR REGULATORY PROCESSES IN TERMS OF PLANNING, ZONING, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. SO, THAT'S OUR AIM.
IT IS A LOT OF WORK. MY PRIORITY AT THE
[02:25:01]
MOMENT IS GETTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN HAD A FOUNDATIONAL POINT.WE KNOW THE ELEMENTS. WE'RE ALL AWARE OF THEM.
WE ALL WORK THEM EVERY DAY. WE'D LIKE STAT TO BE CONFIRMED THE DIRECTION TO MOVE FORWARD, TO BE CONFIRMED IN THIS WAY, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE'LL BE BACK WITH A MORE PRECISE DETAILING OF WHAT DATA WE HAVE AND WHAT POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES WE WILL BRING FORWARD TO ENABLE THAT.
AND THIS WILL BE WORKED THROUGH -- THIS IS A WHOLE CITY OVERVIEW HERE.
IT'S NOT JUST THE FPRA. IT'S THE WHOLE CITY.
WE HAVE OUR STRATEGIC PRIORITIES, AND THOSE SHOULD BE REALLY WELL OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
AND AGAIN, I THINK WE'RE BEHIND ON THAT.
>> SO, YOU'RE LOOKING FOR, FROM THE COMMISSION, IN TERMS OF SPECIFIC DIRECTION OR SPECIFIC -- HAVEN'T WE ALREADY BEEN INTERVIEWED FOR THIS PROCESS? HAVE WE NOT ALREADY HAD INPUT ON THIS? YES?
>> YOU'VE BEEN INTERVIEWED FOR THE UPDATE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
OKAY. >> THIS IS A SPECIFIC DIRECTED MOVEMENT FORWARD TO SOMETHING THAT WE DON'T HAVE AT THE MOMENT.
>> EXCUSE ME, MADAM MAYOR. AND THIS WAS A REQUIREMENT IN THE STRATEGIC PLAN THAT WE PROVIDE EC NO, ONOMIC PLAN UPDATE. THAT'S WHY WE'RE DOING THIS.
IT WAS SPELLED OUT IN THE STRATEGIC
PLAN. >> WE ACTUALLY DID SOMETHING WE SAID WE WERE GOING TO DO.
>> HERE WE ARE. >> EXCELLENT, AN EXCELLENT PLAN. OKAY.
YEAH. OKAY. AND SO, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IS SOMETHING WE TALK ABOUT ALL THE TIME.
WE SHOULD HAVE A MAP, A ROADMAP FOR THAT, ABSOLUTELY, AND A ROADMAP TO HOW TO KEEP IT UP-TO-DATE. COMMISSIONERS, ANYBODY WANT TO CHIME IN HERE?
>> SURE. I THINK THE LEAD- IN TO THIS, YOU HIT ALL THE SALIENT SALIENTPOINTS.
YOU KNOW, THE JOBS CORRIDOR ON KINGS HIGHWAY WE KNOW IS OF CRITICAL IMPORTANCE TO THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE, DEVELOPMENT OF OTHER INDUSTRIAL AREAS TO CREATE JOBS -- I'M GOING TO USE AS EXAMPLE THE -- WHAT WAS IT, THE ARMORED CAR COMPANY THAT CAME
>> REUTILIZATION OF OLDER STRUCTURES THAT ARE LEFT FALLOW BEING REPURPOSED FOR A NEW MODERN- TYPE USE IS OF CRITICAL IMPORTANCE.
WE HAVE THOSE BUILDINGS ALL OVER THE CITY.
SO, THERE'S MULTIPLE OPTIONS OR AVENUES TO PURSUE ALL THESE THINGS COMBINED. OF COURSE THEN IT DOVE TAILS.
IT'S SUCH A PYRAMID. IT'S ALL INTERCONNECTED LIKE A SPIDER WEB. YOU HAVE WORKFORCE HOUSING.
YOU HAVE THE EMPLOYMENT BASE. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE THE EMPLOYMENT BASE WITHOUT WORKFORCE HOUSING TO.
GET WORKFORCE HOUSING, YOU'VE GOT TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS TO GET THAT WHICH AREN'T NECESSARILY POPULAR IN THE COMMUNITY. I WAS INVOLVED IN THE PLANNING BOARD WHEN THE LAST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS DONE, AND -- TO GET THE TIMING. THAT'S NOT THE CASE HERE. WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME. BUT I BELIEVE THE ECONOMIC POINTS THAT YOU PROVIDE IN THE INITIAL PORTION OF YOUR REPORT HERE INCLUDE ALL THE OPTIONS THAT WE DISCUSSED AS FAR AS ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION FOR THE CITY. AND I CAN'T SIT HERE AND THINK OF ANYTHING ELSE WE WOULD ADD. WE JUST NEED TO PURSUE THESE AT AS RAPID A SPEED AS WE CAN. AND I BRING THAT UP.
I'M NOT CRITICIZING. BUT THE ANNEXATION OUT TO THE WEST OF KINGS HIGHWAY, WE NEED TO GET THAT ACCOMPLISHED.
WE NEED THOSE PROPERTIES DEVELOPED SO WE CAN GET THOSE JOBS. WE HAVE APPROVED A VARIETY OF WORKFORCE HOUSING ALREADY IN THE RECENT MONTHS, AND THERE'S GOING TO BE MORE OF THAT FORTHCOMING WITH THAT END OF THE MARKET BEING FERTILE GROUND RIGHT NOW.
I THINK THAT THE COMBINATIONS ARE THERE. AND CHEYENNE, YOU ARE CORRECT, THAT A LOT OF THESE THINGS ARE HAPPENING ORGANICALLY.
WE JUST HAVE TO SPEAK POSITIVELY OF THESE THINGS AND SUPPORT THE INITIATIVES THAT PEOPLE ARE TAKING. AND THE CAPITALIST OPERATION OF OUR COUNTRY IS GOING TO SEE THAT AS AN OPTION TO BE PROFITABLE. THEY'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD IN THOSE AREAS. SO, I THINK THAT THE OUTLINE ISIS THERE. WE DON'T HAVE NECESSARILY IS THE
>> AND I'M NOT SURE HOW WE GET TO THAT POINT OF IMPLEMENTATION. DO WE OUTSOURCE THIS TO CONSULTANTS? DO WE BRING THE TALENT INTO THE CITY? DO WE HAVE THE TALENT IN THE CITY CURRENTLY? I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWERS TO THOSE QUESTIONS. HOWEVER, I DO KNOW THAT WE HAVE THE CONCEPT. WE TALK ABOUT THE CONCEPT ALL THE TIME. BUT THE IMPLEMENTATION IS WHERE I THINK THAT WE ARE NOT DOING ALL THAT WE CAN DO, POTENTIALLY, TO BRING THIS
>> LET ME JUST ADDRESS THAT. SO, ALL OF THE ITEMS -- CAN
[02:30:02]
I HAVE THE MOUSE?>> THE ITEMS THAT ARE LISTED UNDER THE PRIORITIES ARE ALL UNDERWAY.
>> RIGHT. >> THEY'RE ALL BEING IMPLEMENTED IN SOME FORM OR FASHION.
I THINK WITH THIS CONVERSATION THAT WE'RE HAVING TODAY -- THERE WE GO -- IS REALLY MAKING THE COMMUNITY AND THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY AWARE OF THAT BY HAVING IT IN OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE SAME THING HAPPENED WITH THE TAX ABATEMENT PROGRAM.
IT EXISTED. IT'S BEEN APPROVED BY THE VOTERS, HOW MANY 10- YEAR EXTENSIONS. I THINK 2022 WAS THE LAST TIME.
AND IT WASN'T IN OUR CODE, RIGHT? SO, IT WAS LIKE WE DID THAT IN JANUARY, MAKE SURE WE HAVE THIS ORDINANCE DONE. AND REALLY, YOU KNOW, BROADCASTING THAT OUT TO THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY THAT WE ARE READY FOR DEVELOPMENT. BUT ALL OF THESE INDIVIDUAL PIECES ARE A PART OF THAT BIGGER PICTURE, RIGHT? AND THIS WOULD JUST REALLY LAY THE GROUNDWORK, SET THE STAGE, WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT, TO SIGNAL TO THE DEVELOPERS THAT WE ARE HERE AND WE'RE READY.
>> I THINK THAT THAT IS BEING SUCCESSFUL.
IN MY TRAVELS THROUGHOUT THE CITY ON CITY BUSINESS, I GET FEEDBACK CONSISTENTLY ABOUT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES, JOB CREATION OPPORTUNITIES, ET CETERA. I'M HEARING IT CONSISTENTLY.
IT USED TO BE JUST HERE AND THERE. I HEAR IT CONSISTENTLY NOW THAT PEOPLE ARE EXCITED ABOUT THE UNDERTAKINGS THAT WE'RE INVOLVED IN, WHAT CAN THEY DO TO HELP? GO OUT AND SPEND MONEY AND BUILD HOUSES OR BUY AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AND RENOVATE IT, WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE. THIS DISCUSSION IS TAKING PLACE ACTIVELY IN THOSE COMMUNITIES RIGHT NOW.
I'M NOT TALKING COMMUNITIES WHERE PEOPLE LIVE.
I'M TALKING THE BUSINESS COMMUNITIES, CONSTRUCTION, DEVELOPMENT, BUSINESS OWNERS THAT ARE LOOKING TO EXPAND THEIR OPERATIONS HERE IN FORT PIERCE, ET CETERA.
I HEAR THIS CONSTANTLY THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY. SO, I THINK THAT YOUR MESSAGING IS CORRECT THAT IT IS MAKING PENETRATION INTO THOSE MARKETS. WE JUST NEED TO CONTINUE IN THAT SAME VEIN. BUT I THINK IT'S BEING SUCCESSFUL SO FAR.
>> YOU WANT TO CHIME IN HERE, COMMISSIONER JOHNSON?
>> WELL, I'M SITTING HERE AND I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT EXACTLY WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACHIEVE HERE. I KNOW IT'S AN UPDATE ON A STRATEGIC PLAN. ONE OF THE THINGS -- MADAM MAYOR, YOU AND I SAW THIS THIS WEEKEND -- IS WE HAVE TO COMMUNICATE THIS TO OUR PUBLIC, RIGHT? SO, A LOT OF THIS, I'M SITTING HERE AND THERE ARE THINGS ACTIVELY WORKING THROUGH THE PROCESS RIGHT NOW.
AND I THINK TO MAKE SURE WE BRING THIS HOME IS THAT THEY PROBABLY NEED TO BE LISTED, RIGHT, AS TO WHAT THAT SPECIFIC PROJECT IS AND WHAT THE STATUS IS OF WHAT THAT PARTICULAR UPDATE SO THE PUBLIC CAN COME ALONG. SO, YOU MENTIONED THE DATE FOR LINCOLN PARK MASTER PLAN. WELL, THOSE DATES SHOULD PROBABLY BE A PART OF THIS TO SAY HERE ARE THE DATES WE'VE IDENTIFIED TO SAY THIS PLAN IS HERE AND THIS IS WHERE WE'RE GOING TO GO, ET CETERA, ET CETERA, ET CETERA. THIS JOB CORRIDOR, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED ALREADY OUT THERE ON THAT WESTERN CORRIDOR. THERE ARE HOUSING PROJECTS THAT ARE LITERALLY GOING UP ON JENKINS ROAD RIGHT NOW THAT WE APPROVED TWO, THREE YEARS AGO THAT ARE JUST STARTING TO COME OUT THE GROUND.
BUT I THINK THAT'S HOW WE MAKE THIS, YOU KNOW, A LITTLE MORE LIVABLE, I THINK, AND GIVES US -- GIVES THE PUBLIC THAT REAL SENSE -- BECAUSE THEY DRIVE BY AND SEE STUFF AND THEY ALWAYS GOING, WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? WHAT'S GOING ON THERE? YOU MENTIONED THIS REFURBISHING FOR THIS COMPANY WITH THE MONEY TRANSFER. YOU KNOW, THOSE ARE THINGS THAT WE KNOW IS HAPPENING AND THE PUBLIC, KIND OF, COMES ALONG, THEY'LL EITHER SEE SOMETHING OR THEY'LL HEAR SOMETHING AND THEN THEY'LL START ASKING.
BUT I THINK IF WE CAN FIND A WAY TO EMBELLISH THIS PAGE HERE, WE SAW THIS JUST THIS PAST WEEKEND AT OUR CONFERENCE WHERE THERE WAS A WHOLE PANEL TALKING ABOUT THEY USED IT FROM THEIR BUDGET PERSPECTIVE.
SO, THEY PUT IT IN CONTEXT OF HOW THEY SPENT THEIR BUDGET
MONEYS. >> THEY WERE IN COMMUNICATION -- HOW THEY COMMUNICATED IT --
>> COMMUNICATE THAT BUDGET. THAT'S RIGHT.
THAT'S RIGHT. IT'S A WHOLE SEGMENT ON THAT. AND THEY LITERALLY WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS AND THEY TIED IT BACK TO BUDGET SPEND OR THINGS WE INVESTED IN TO GET THIS HERE AND/OR APPROVALS.
THIS IS ALSO AN AREA WHERE I'VE ASKED MRS. COX AS WE MOVE FORWARD, EVEN TODAY, I MEAN, WE HAVE APPROVED THINGS ON THIS AGENDA TODAY THAT PROBABLY -- IMPACT THE STRATEGIC PLAN. YOU KNOW, $125,000 FOR HOMELESSNESS IS SOMEWHERE ON THIS PLAN WHEN IT COMES TO SOMETHING ON HERE.
SO, THE PUBLIC DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THAT.
WE HAVE TO HELP PUT IT IN THE BUCKET SO THEY CAN SEE THEIR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK, WHAT WE'RE DOING, HOW WE'RE PAYING ATTENTION, AND HOW WE'RE METHODICALLY MOVING. SO, WHAT THAT DOES IS THAT IT DOES EXCITE THE COMMUNITY, GIVES IT HOPE, ASPIRATION.
AND THEY NOW SEE THAT WE'RE DOING WHAT WE SAY WE'RE GOING TO DO.
AND THAT WILL SPUR CAPITALISM AND EVERYBODY ELSE INVESTING AT THAT POINT.
SO, I LIKE IT. I JUST THINK WE'VE GOT TO GET A LITTLE TIGHTER ON HOW WE
COMMUNICATE IT. >> COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, IF I
[02:35:02]
MAY, THE BROADER GOAL FOR US IS TO INCORPORATE THE DETAIL INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.>> YOU HAVE THE DETAIL -- I AGREE WITH YOU 100%.
IN DETAILING THE PROGRAMS AND PRIORITIES, WHAT WE ACTUALLY ARE DOING. BUT THE KEY FOR US IS TO DETAIL THE ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SO AS WE BUILD OUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND TALK ABOUT WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, TALK ABOUT THE TYPE OF BUSINESSES WE WANT TO BRING IN THE CITY, SO WE CAN ATTRACT HIGHEST WAGES FOR THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, HOW WE HAVE CERTAIN ZONING FOR HOUSING SO WE CAN HAVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING THAT'S ZONED FOR CERTAIN COMMUNITIES AND CERTAIN DESIGNS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER.
SO, YOU HAVE THE OVERARCHING GOAL, HOW WE GET THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND THE MORE DETAILED GOAL. WHAT ARE THE PROPERTIES IN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOP PLAN SO WE CAN COMMUNICATE THAT? IT'S TWOFOLD, BUT THE KEY FOR US IS GET THE PRIORITIES INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CLEARLY SPELLED OUT.
SO, WHEN WE START TALKING ABOUT BUDGETING -- WE'RE KICKING THE BUDGET OFF NEXT MONTH, BELIEVE IT OR NOT.
WE'LL HAVE A PRESENTATION ON HOW THE MONEY'S BEING SPENT, DETAIL HOW WE'RE SPENDING MONEY IN CERTAIN AREAS FROM ENTERPRISE TO GENERAL FUND AND THE LIKE. BUT YOU INITIALLY STATE WHAT ARE WE DOING HERE? THE BROADER INITIATIVE IS TO GET THE PROPERTIES INTO THE COMP PLAN.
BUT EVERYTHING IS WELL-TAKEN. WE HAVE TO SPELL IT OUT TO COMMUNICTE TO THE COMMUNITY WHAT WE ARE DOING SO THEY CAN SEE THE ACHIEVEMENTS AND THEY RIDE AROUND TOWN, THEY KNOW HOW IT'S CONNECTED TO WHAT WE'RE DOING. I HOPE THAT MAKES SENSE.
NO? >> I KNOW WE'RE NOT GETTING INTO THE DETAILS, BUT WE DO HAVE SOME BIG THINGS GOING ON IN FORT PIERCE THAT ARE JUST HAPPENING ALREADY ORGANICALLY. AND ONE OF THEM IS THE WHOLE WESTERN PART OF THE CITY IS GROWING WITH -- WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A WHOLE BUNCH OF EXTRA CITIZENS PRETTY SOON LIVING IN THOSE HOUSES OUT THERE.
AND THAT AFFECTS TRANSPORTATION. AND THEN YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT OUR HISTORIC ECONOMIC SUPPORT SYSTEM WAS CITRUS AND FISHING. BUT THE WATERWAYS ARE STILL VERY IMPORTANT TO THIS COMMUNITY.
>> VERY IMPORTANT TO THE ECONOMY.
SO, WE JUST HAVE TO -- AND FISHING ACTUALLY IS VERY -- IT MAY NOT BE VERY VISIBLE, BUT THERE IS A LOT OF COMMERCIAL FISHING STILL GOING ON. AND SO I THINK THAT AS MUCH AS WE WANT TO EMBRACE THE NEW FORT PIERCE, WE ALSO WANT TO KEEP WHAT'S VALUABLE OF THE OLD FORT
>> MANY OF OUR CITIZENS WILL SAY OUR OLD FORT PIERCE SAYS, DON'T CHANGE IT ANYMORE.
RIGHT? NO MORE PEOPLE. THE NEWER PEOPLE TO FORT PIERCE SAY, NOW THAT I'M HERE, STOP THE GROWTH, NO MORE PEOPLE, RIGHT?
>> EXACTLY. CLOSE THE DOOR ON YOUR WAY IN.
>> YEP. SO, WE WANT TO KEEP FORT PIERCE ITS CHARM, BUT WE ALSO KNOW THAT PEOPLE ARE COMING AND GROWTH IS HAPPENING AND WE NEED TO HAVE A BROADER TAX BASE. SO, MY WISH WOULD BE FOR US TO REMEMBER WHAT'S REALLY, REALLY VALUABLE ABOUT FORT PIERCE AND KEEPĆ·Ć· THAT AND ADAPT TO WHATEVER IS MODERN RIGHT NOW. ANYBODY ELSE? YOU'RE GOOD? YOU GOT DIRECTION? THANK YOU FOR SHARING THIS. IT REMINDED US OF
[C. Discussion and approval of City Manager's appointment of Fort Pierce Police Chief.]
ALL THE GOOD THINGS WE ARE DOING.>> OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM IS DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY MANAGER'S APPOINTMENT OF THE FORT PIERCE POLICE CHIEF.
>> LAST WEEK, COMMISSIONERS, I SELECTED THREE FINALISTS FOR THE POLICE CHIEF POSITION.
AND FIRSTLY, I WANT TO THANK ALL OF THE ATTENDEES WHO WAS AT THE MEET AND GREET. AND ACTUALLY EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE NOT IN SUPPORT OF THE CANDIDATES I HAD SELECTED, THEY HAD TAKEN TIME OUT TO MEET THEM THEMSELVES ONE ON ONE, ALTHOUGH IT WAS BRIEFLY, AN HOUR, HALF HOUR IN SOME INSTANCES.
AT LEAST I FELT THEY GAVE THEMSELVES AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE CANDIDATES THAT I SELECTED. AND I THINK THAT WENT A LONG WAY WITH ME BECAUSE I SAW DIFFERENT MEMBERS FROM THE COMMUNITY, EVEN OUTSIDE OF FORT PIERCE. THAT WEEKEND A LONG WAY FOR ME BECAUSE THEY HAD AN OPPORTUNITY, PERHAPS A SNIPPET OF WHAT I SAW. I APPRECIATE THAT.
THAT WENT A LONG WAY FOR ME FOR THOSE WHO ATTENDED.
SUBSEQUENT TO THAT, I MADE A SELECTION, AND I BELIEVE I NOTIFIED YOU LAST THURSDAY AROUND 4:00 P.M. THAT I SELECTED DAVID M. SMITH FROM PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT. I THINK HE'S VERY TALENTED.
HE HAS A FRESH APPROACH TO COMMUNITY POLICING, COMMUNITY- FOCUSING POLICING. AND WHAT IMPRESSED ME
[02:40:01]
MOST WAS IN THE PROCESS HE REALLY POINTED TOWARD OUR PLEMENTATION. IT HAS SALIENT POINTS ON HOW WE CAN APPROACH IT AND HIS IDEAS ON IMPLEMENTATION AS WELL. SO, I REALLY FEEL HE IS A STRONG CANDIDATE. AND WHEN YOU HAVE INTERVIEWS -- SOMEONE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, THERE WERE SEVEN CANDIDATES, ALL OF THEM ARE QUALIFIED.ONCE YOU GO THROUGH THE INTERVIEW PROCESS, IT'S ABOUT PERFORMANCE, ARTICULATION, COMMUNICATION, INTERPERSONAL SKILLS, AND THE ABILITY FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE TO ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO CROSS ALL THE AREAS OF THE CITY, CITY COMMISSION, CITY MANAGER, CERTAINLY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE COMMUNITY. AND WHEN I PUT TOGETHER A TEAM, LIKE FOR THE FIT AND I FEEL THAT ALL THE CANDIDATES WSH -- THAT THE FINALISTS, AS WELL AS THE FOUR THAT DIDN'T MOVE FORWARD, WERE VERY QUALIFIED.
BUT IT'S THE FIT AS WELL. AND I BELIEVE THAT MR. SMITH FITS WHAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT NEEDS AND LOOKING FOR RIGHT NOW. AND IN ADDITION I FEEL THAT HE'LL GET ALONG VERY WELL WITH ME.
AND HE UNDERSTANDS CLEARLY. HE TALKS ABOUT MY VISION FOR THE DEPARTMENT BASED ON THE CITY COMMISSION VISION. I LEARNED CLEARLY THAT I AM ALIGNED WITH THE CITY COMMISSION. WHENEVER THE POINT IN TIME COMES I'M NOT ALIGNED WITH THE CITY COMMISSION, I NEED TO MOVE ON. I MAY MAKE DECISIONS THAT MAY NOT BE YOUR DECISION SPECIFICALLY, BUT I SUPPORT YOUR VISION AS WELL.
I WANT THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO UNDERSTAND THAT AS WELL, MY SELECTED CANDIDATE. I DID SELECT MR. SMITH.
I THINK HE'S WELL QUALIFIED. I THINK HE'LL DO A LOT FOR BRINGING ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE DEPARTMENT, STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS WITH THE COMMUNITY, BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY BUILDING A STRONG COHESIVE POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT I DON'T FEEL IS AS UNIFIED AS IT SHOULD BE.
HE'S NOT GOING TO BE THE GIFT OF ALL, BUT I BELIEVE HE'LL BE ABLE TO BRING UNIFICATION AND BRIDGE THE FRAGMENTATION THAT EXISTS, WHETHER IT'S FROM -- PARDON MY EXPRESSION -- FACTIONS FROM THE PRIOR CHIEF TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY. I THINK THAT'S AN ESSENTIAL CHALLENGE FOR HIM AS HE GOES INTO THE DEPARTMENT. I BELIEVE AS WE GET TO KNOW HIM INDIVIDUALLY, I BELIEVE THAT HE'LL BE ABLE TO BE A GOOD REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OR THE COMMUNITY, BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY A CHAMPION FOR THE CITY'S OVERALL MISSION.
THAT BEING SAID, THAT'S MY CANDIDATE.
>> OKAY. COMMISSIONERS, ANYBODY LIKE TO START?
>> OKAY. >> I HAVE A LEGAL QUESTION FOR MADAM ATTORNEY. MADAM ATTORNEY, WE -- ALL OF US GOT A EMAIL TODAY, THIS MORNING, AND I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT SINCE WE'RE AT THIS DISCUSSION, IT'S READ FROM THE POLICE --
>> I GOT IT THIS MORNING. IT'S FROM THE POLICE UNION.
SO I WANTED TO KNOW SINCE IT'S PUBLIC RECORD SINCE IT CAME TO OUR EMAILS, IS IT APPROPRIATE TO READ THE EMAIL, OR IS IT NOT? I'M JUST -- IF NOT, I'LL LEAVE IT ALONE AND MOVE ON. BUT WE DID GET A -- WE DID GET AN EMAIL FROM -- LET ME FIND IT.
>> MADAM MAYOR? COMMISSIONERS, I DON'T BELIEVE I'VE SEEN THE EMAIL YET THAT COMMISSIONER GAINES IS REFERRING TO. BUT IF YOU DO WANT TO READ AN EMAIL INTO THE RECORD, YOU WOULD -- WE WOULD JUST NEED TO PROVIDE THAT EMAIL TO THE CITY CLERK SO SHE CAN MAKE IT, KIND OF, AN ATTACHMENT TO THIS MEETING.
>> OR CARTER? IS THAT RIGHT? IS THAT THE ONE?
>> CARTER CAME IN AT 8:05 THIS MORNING AND THEN WENT TO MAYOR HUDSON, MYSELF, COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER BRODERICK, MRS. COX, AND MR. CHESS. SO, IT'S TO ALL OF US.
AND IT SAYS, MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS, GOOD MORNING.
I ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO SPEAK IN PERSON AT TODAY'S MEETING, BUT A LAST- MINUTE PERSONAL SITUATION HAS MADE THAT IMPOSSIBLE.
EXCUSE ME. ALTHOUGH THE UNION PERFECTLY ENDORSED AN INTERNAL CANDIDATE FOR CHIEF OF POLICE, I WANT TO CONFIRM THAT THE UNION IS IN ALIGNMENT AND AGREEMENT WITH THE SELECTION OF DAVID SMITH.
MR. SMITH WAS HIGHLY IMPRESSIVEIMPRESSIVE DURING THE MEET AND GREET AND REFLECTS THE VALUE, THE VALUES AND COLLABORATIVE WORK APPROACH THAT WILL MOVE THIS DEPARTMENT FORWARD. WE ARE COMMITTED TO SUPPORTING THIS SELECTION BY UNITING IN THE COMMUNITY AND BUILDING STRONG SUPPORT. THANK YOU, TROY CARTER, FORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SUPERVISOR UNION REPRESENTATIVE. SO, I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT
[02:45:02]
THAT THAT IS READ. I HOPE WHATEVER PERSONAL, YOU KNOW, SITUATION FOR MR. CARTER, HE IS RESOLVING AND IT'S NOTHING MAJOR AND HARMFUL. BUT FOR HIM TO WRITE THAT EMAIL TO ALL OF US, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT IT BE SHARED WITH THE PUBLIC.WITH THAT BEING SAID, I DID NOT GO TO THE MEET AND GREET BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT TO BE A DISTRACTION.
I'M GOING TO BE HONEST WITH YOU.
I DIDN'T WANT TO BE A DISTRACTION. I WANTED THE PUBLIC TO HAVE THEIR TIME WITH THE CANDIDATES WITHOUT THE COMMISSIONERS THERE. I WENT AND INTERVIEWED EVERYBODY. AND I, TOO, WAS GOING IN -- I'LL JUST BE HONEST -- GOING INTO MY INTERVIEWS, MR. SMITH WAS NOT MY FIRST CHOICE. AFTER THE INTERVIEWS, MR. SMITH WAS MY CHOICE. AND I'LL TELL YOU BECAUSE HE TALKED ABOUT THE PLAN FROM THE 84 POINTS.
HE TALKED ABOUT CERTAIN THINGS IN OUR COMMUNITY.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT STRUCK ME WAS THAT HE ASKED A QUESTION CHI COULDN'T ANSWER. AND IT'S NO BIG DEAL.
I COULDN'T ANSWER. HE ASKED WHY THE SUBSTATION ON AVENUE D WAS NOT OPEN OR
>> NOT OPEN LIMITED, NOT OPEN EVERY DAY.
HE RODE AROUND THE COMMUNITY, HE SAW CERTAIN THINGS.
HE EVEN ASKED ABOUT -- HE EVEN ASKED ABOUT DO WE HAVE ANYANY OF CODE OR ANYTHING DEALING WITH THE DIRT BIKES DRIVING UP AND DOWN 25TH STREET AND ALL THE REST OF THE COMMUNITY THAT HE SAW. ONE OF THE THINGS HE TALKED ABOUT WAS -- TALKED ABOUT WAS WORKING WITH THE CITY MANAGER, WORKING WITH THE CITY COMMISSION, AND MAKING CHANGES AT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. SO, YOU KNOW, AFTER THE INTERVIEW -- AND I INTERVIEWED EVERYBODY ELSE -- I THOUGHT THAT HE WOULD BE THE BEST CANDIDATE. ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT I TALKED TO HIM ABOUT WASWAS ASKED HIM DID HE WATCH THE MEETING MONDAY. HE SAID HE DID. AND I ASKED HIM ABOUT THE CONCERN THAT THE CITIZENS HAVE OF INTERNAL PROMOTIONS.
AND HE SAID, COMMISSIONER, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I WILL PERSONALLY TAKE HAND AND LOOK INTO BECAUSE AS A CHIEF -- THESE ARE HIS WORDS AND I'M PARAPHRASING.
AS A CHIEF, WHEN YOU LEAVE A DEPARTMENT OR YOU BELIEVE A FORCE, IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANYBODY READY TO STEP IN, EVEN IF THE CHIEF TAKES A LEAVE OF ABSENCE, IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANYBODY TO STEP IN AND BE READY TO TAKE OVER, THAT'S A REFLECTION ON YOUR LEADERSHIP AND YOUR TIME AS CHIEF. THAT STRUCK A NERVE TO ME.
SO, HE WANTS TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY THAT COMES INSIDE OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS A CHANCE TO MOVE UP THE RANKING. SO, I THINK HE WOULD BE A GREAT JOB FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. AND I'M READY TO -- TO MOVE ON AND GIVE HIM THE -- LET HIM BECOME CHIEF.
AND LET'S CONTINUE TO BUILD OUR
>> SO, FIRST, LET ME SAY THANK YOU TO STAFF.
I NOTICED SOME INTERNAL STAFF THAT WORKED ALONG WITH YOU, MR. CHESS. I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROCESS THAT YOU WORKED THROUGH WORKING WITH THE CONSULTANT TO GO FROM A VERY LARGE LIST OF A LOT OF APPLICANTS WHITTLING THAT DOWN TO ABOUT SEVEN, I THINK, THAT WAS, KIND OF, SHORT LISTED FROM I THINK IT'S CLOSE TO 80 OR 50 OR SOME PEOPLE --
>> -- 57. SO, WE GOT TO SEVEN.
AND THAT WAS YOUR SHORT LIST. AND THEN YOU HAD INTERVIEWS WITH THOSE SEVEN PEOPLE WITH YOUR COMMITTEE. FROM THAT SEVEN YOU GOT DOWN TO THREE. SO, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I PUBLICLY STATE THAT SO THAT THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDS THERE WAS A WHITTLING DOWN TO GET FROM A SHORT LIST FROM 50 TO 7 AND THEN FROM THAT 7 DOWN TO 3. THE PROCESS, AS COMMISSIONER GAINES, WE ALL PARTICIPATED IN, AND I FOUND ALL THREE CANDIDATES TO BE HIGHLY QUALIFIED FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. AND SO THANK YOU FOR PUTTING QUALIFIED CANDIDATES IN FRONT OF US, RIGHT? ALL OF THE CANDIDATES WERE,
[02:50:03]
BUT THEY REALLY STOOD OUT TO YOU.AND I WOULD AGREE AND ECHO THAT. MY DECISION IS IN SUPPORT OF YOU AND THE CANDIDATE, DAVID SMITH, RIGHT? I FOUND HIM TO -- A COUPLE POINTS I'LL REITERATE -- I WON'T REITERATE WHAT COMMISSIONER GAINES ALREADY ELOQUENTLY STATED. BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT STOOD OUT TO ME WAS THAT MEET AND GREET HAD QUITE AN IMPRESSION ON THEM. ALL OF THEM.
NONE OF THOSE THREE CANDIDATES HAD EVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THAT OR BEEN A PART OF THAT, SO THAT WAS REALLY GOOD. IT PROVIDED A LITTLE PRESSURE TEST FOR THEM. BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE COMMUNITY -- AND I HAVE TO SAY THIS -- MADE AN IMPACT ON ALL OF THEM, ESPECIALLY MR. SMITH.
THERE WERE CERTAIN PEOPLE THAT HE DESCRIBED IN DETAIL AS TO THEIR CONCERNS.
SO, I WOULD JUST ENCOURAGE YOU THAT HAD THAT INTERACTION WITH HIM TO CONTINUE THAT BECAUSE HE REMEMBERS THAT.
IT'S GOING TO BE IMPORTANT THAT YOU CONTINUE TO HAVE THAT SYSTEM OF DIALOGUE WITH MR. SMITH.
I THINK THE OTHER THING THAT WAS THERE WAS THAT HE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO INTERACT WITH CURRENT OFFICERS, UNION REPRESENTATIVE, ET CETERA. THERE WERE OBSERVATIONS MADE.
AND AGAIN, THAT DIALOGUE IS GOING TO BE A TWO-WAY STREET, RIGHT? IT'S GOING TO BE BACK AND FORTH. AND YOU GUYS HAVING THAT CONVERSATION. I DID NOT ATTEND PERSONALLY, BUT PEOPLE CALLED ME FROM THERE.
SO, THEY LET ME KNOW WHAT THEIR IMPRESSIONS WERE.
I HAD AN INTERACTION WITH THE YOUNG LADY THE OTHER DAY WHO ATTENDED FACE TO FACE, AND SHE SHARED WITH ME, YOU KNOW, I SUPPORT THIS GUY AND HERE'S THE REASON WHY. AND SO SHE LAID OUT THE ME HER OBSERVATION OF THIS INTERACTION. AND SHE LITERALLY JUST STOOD NEXT TO ME AND WATCHED ME TALK TO UNION REPS, WATCHED HIM TALK TO OFFICERS, WATCHED HIM TALK TO DIFFERENT PARTS OF OUR COMMUNITY AND MADE AN IMPRESSION ON HER, RIGHT? SO, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I'M BIG ON IS REALLY UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE OPPORTUNITIES OBVIOUSLY FOR INTERNAL. WE ALSO NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE SETTING UP INTERNAL FOR GREAT SUCCESS.
AND I -- AND IN CANDIDATE, WE HAVE SOMEONE COMING TO OUR AREA THAT HAS DEALT WITH A VERY, VERY DIVERSE COMMUNITY, MUCH MORE DIVERSE THAN OURS AT THE MOMENT, IN HAVING TO DEAL WITH SOME REAL STRATEGIC CHALLENGES. AND I THINK WE'RE GOING TO BENEFIT FROM THAT BECAUSE WE'RE A GROWING COMMUNITY. MUCH OF OUR URBAN CHALLENGE RIGHT NOW, BEING AN URBAN CITY, IS THAT WE HAVE OUTSIDE FORCES COMING INTO OUR CITY AND THEN GOING BACK TO THE THESE OTHER URBAN AREAS. BUT THEY'RE ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN STUFF THAT'S GOING ON IN FORT PIERCE THAT WE DON'T LIKE, CRIME, ET CETERA, ET CETERA. SO, AS WE GET THESE BOUNDARIES -- HAVE TO DEVELOP SOME OF THESE RELATIONSHIPS AND REALLY ATTACK THIS FROM A CREATIVE STANDPOINT, I GOT THAT FROM THIS CANDIDATE AND SOME OF THE THINGS HE SHARED WITH ME. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT MOST IMPRESSED ME -- AND MR. CHESS, I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO GETTING THIS FROM HIM -- WAS HE TALKED ABOUT AN ANNUAL PLAN FROM THE POLICE DEPARTMENT SPECIFICALLY. NOT WHAT WE DO, BUT POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE DEPARTMENT STUFF, BEING VERY TRANSPARENT TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT HERE ARE THE CRIME NUMBERS, HERE'S WHAT'S HAPPENING, HERE'S WHAT I'M DOING ABOUT IT, AND HAVING THIS PUBLICATION. AND HE ASKED ME ABOUT IT.
AND I DIDN'T KNOW. AND I THINK WE -- I KNOW THAT WE HAVE HAD CHIEFS AND THE CHIEF HAS SAT RIGHT THERE AND GONE OVER REPORTS WITH US AND DATA.
I KNOW THAT HAS HAPPENED. SO, I'M NOT SAYING IT DIDN'T.
BUT TO PUT IT IN AN ACTUAL FORMAL BOOK THAT THE -- A MANUAL REPORT THAT YOU GET AS THE PUBLIC THAT YOU CAN GO TO THE WEBSITE, DOWNLOAD, TAKE TO YOUR COMMUNITY MEETINGS. I WAS VERY IMPRESSED WITH THAT.
I THINK THAT THAT'S GOING TO PROVIDE THE LEVEL OF TRANSPARENCY PEOPLE ARE ASKING FOR AND SEEKING.
AND I THINK THAT THAT WILL ALSO ALLOW FOR US TO CONTINUE TO SEE HOW WE CAN BE OF SUPPORT TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND BE OF SUPPORT TO OUR COMMUNITY BECAUSE ULTIMATELY WHAT WE'RE DOING IS TAKING TAXPAYER DOLLARS AND INVESTING THIS IN A MECHANISM THAT WE WANT A SAFE COMMUNITY.
WE WILL HAVE A SAFE COMMUNITY BECAUSE WE'RE A GROWING COMMUNITY AND WE WANT THAT TO CONTINUE. SO, I'M IN SUPPORT OF THE CANDIDATE. AGAIN, I THOUGHT THE PROCESS, WHILE IT WAS PROBABLY DIFFERENT FOR SOME MAYBE THAN WHAT WE'VE DONE BEFORE, BUT ULTIMATELY, AGAIN, I'M GOING TO SAY THIS. I'M SUPPORTING THE DECISION OF THE CITY MANAGER. THE CITY MANAGER, THIS IS HIS EMPLOYEE. THE CHIEF OF POLICE REPORTS TO THE CITY MANAGER. I HAVE THREE PEOPLE THAT I DEAL WITH IN THE CITY. THAT'S THE CITY ATTORNEY, CLERK, AND THE CITY MANAGER. THOSE ARE MY THREE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS THAT I HOLD RESPONSIBLE. AND I HAVE
[02:55:01]
CONVERSATIONS WITH AND THEIR RESPECTIVE DEPARTMENTS. MR. CHESS, YOU KNOW, I LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR SUPPORT AND OUR SUPPORT OF THIS. THIS CANDIDATE YOU'RE BRINGING FORWARD. BUT JUST KNOW, TOO, THAT WE'RE LISTENING AND WE'RE WATCHING AND WE'RE OBSERVING AND WE WANT TO GIVE SUPPORT. BUT IF THERE ARE SOME OTHER THINGS THAT DO ARISE THAT WILL BE DEALT WITH, YOU AND I, REGARDING THE CHIEF OF POLICE.IT'S NOT ME GOING DOWN TO THE POLICE, TALKING TO THEM DIRECTLY UNLESS THERE ARE THINGS THAT I NEED ANSWERS TO, QUESTIONS. AND THEN I THINK THEY SHOULD COME AND TALK TO ALL OF US AS OPPOSED TO JUST TALKING TO ME. SO, THAT'S WHERE
BRODERICK? >> MADAM MAYOR, A FEW POINTS.
FIRST TO OUR ESTEEMED MEMBERS OF THE MEDIA, I AM NOT INTENDED TO RELITIGATE THE PROCESS HERE.
SO, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET ANY GREAT SOUND BITES OUT OF ME TODAY. HAVING SAID THAT, I HAVE BEEN CRITICAL OF THE PROCESS. THAT'S A DISCUSSION THAT MR. CHESS AND I HAVE HAD AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO HAVE.
BUT REGARDING THIS SPECIFIC CANDIDATE, I AGREE WITH MR. CHESS' SELECTION. AND I THOUGHT ALL THE INTERVIEWEES WERE TREMENDOUS CANDIDATES, CANDIDLY.
AND MR. SMITH IMPRESSED ME, THOUGH, ON SEVERAL OF THE POINTS THAT MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS HAVE BROUGHT UP. BUT THERE WAS ONE AVENUE THAT I PURSUED WITH HIM THAT I HAVE NOT HEARD MENTIONED. THE PREVAILING THEORY THAT I PRESENTED TO HIM WAS, WELL, LOOK, CRIME -- THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S FUNCTION IS TO DEAL WITH CRIME, SUPPRESS CRIME, LOWER CRIME RATES, ET CETERA.
BUT I SAID, THE CITY COMMISSION HAS AN OVERALL GREATER VISION FOR THE CITY, WITH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ECONOMIC INCENTIVES, TO BRING IN GOOD-PAYING JOBS. I GET IT.
IT'S A CASCADING EVENT THAT CREATES THIS. AND I PAINTED THAT PICTURE FOR HIM. AND HE SAID, HOW CAN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOW CAN I, AS CHIEF, PARTNER WITH YOU TO MAKE THAT PLAN SUCCEED? AS WE ALL KNOW, WHEN THE TIDE COMES IN, ALL SHIPS RISE. IF WE ARE ABLE TO PREVENT -- PRESENT -- ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AND GOOD EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES FROM THE CITIZENS OF FORT PIERCE, I BELIEVE THAT PEOPLE INVOLVED IN CRIME ARE GOING TO TRANSITION TO THAT VERSUS RISKING GOING TO JAIL, ET CETERA.
SO, I BELIEVE THAT THERE'S A TREMENDOUS OPPORTUNITY THERE TO MARRY TOGETHER POLICING ACTIVITIES. AND THE CHIEF WAS VERY ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT WHAT CAN I DO TO SUPPORT THAT INITIATIVE? CAN I BE INVOLVED IN THOSE DISCUSSIONS TO GIVE A POLICING INPUT ON THAT? AND I SAID, THAT'S MR. CHESS' DECISION ULTIMATELY. BUT FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, THE MORE INTELLIGENT OUTPUT WE HAVE TO THE PERSPECTIVES IN ACCOMPLISHING THE GOALS IS BETTER.
-- CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE AND FPRA AND THEIR INITIATIVES. EVERYTHING THAT WAS PRESENTED HERE TODAY, HE'S SAYING, I WANT TO BE PART OF THAT.
AND HE WAS VERY -- HIS ENTHUSIASM WAS INFECTIOUS, CANDIDLY, AND IT GOT ME MORE EXCITED.
I'M THE ONE PRESENTING IT TO HIM, AND I GOT MORE EXCITED ABOUT IT. I THINK I BLEW THE WALLS OFF BETWEEN COMMISSIONER GAINES AND JOHNSON HERE.
I THINK HE'S A VERY QUALIFIED CANDIDATE.
I ASKED THE QUESTION SPECIFICALLY, WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO COME TO FORT PIERCE? I DON'T REMEMBER THE EXACT ANSWER TO THAT, BUT I FOUND IT TO BE A VERY CONSOLING, SATISFYING ANSWER AS TO WHY HE WANTED TO BRING HIS FAMILY HERE AND BE PART OF A REDEVELOPMENT OF A CITY THAT IS WELL -- THE REDEVELOPMENT IS WELL UNDERWAY.
BUPT HE WANTS TO BE PART OF THAT.
AND THE EXCITEMENT OF THAT I FOUND TO BE VERY COMPELLING IN HIS SELECTION AS THE NEW CHIEF.
THE OTHER THING I WOULD ASK, I DID ATTEND THE MEET AND GREET. I WENT DOWN THERE JUST TO MAKE AN INTRODUCTION AND I WASN'T THERE LONG. I DID HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THE UNION GUYS WHILE I WAS THERE, AND I ASKED THEM. I SAID, LOOK, MY INTERVIEW STARTED AT 9:00 TOMORROW MORNING.
CALL ME BETWEEN 8:00 AND 9:00 AND GIVE ME YOUR INPUT.
I GOT CALLS FROM INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS SAYING, WE SUPPORT THIS GUY. THEIR INPUT TO THIS PART OF THE PROCESS WAS IMPORTANT TO ME AS WELL. ANOTHER COMPONENT THAT WAS VERY, VERY IMPORTANT TO ME, AS YOU KNOW I'M VERY CONCERNED ABOUT DEVELOPMENT AND FOSTERING OF OUR STAFF CURRENTLY FOR LEAD AND COMMAND POSITIONS MOVING FORWARD.
I'VE HAD THE CHANCE TO TALK TO CHIEF RIDDELL ABOUT THIS. I'VE TALKED TO A VARIETY OF THE STAFF. THERE'S COMPLETE AGREEMENT THAT WE WANT TO FOSTER FROM WITHIN, PROMOTE FROM WITHIN, INCREASE OUR KNOWLEDGE BASED ON OUR EXISTING DEPARTMENT STAFF SO THEY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITIES TO STEP INTO THESE POSITIONS MOVING FORWARD. MR. SMITH'S RESPONSE WAS QUITE INTERESTING. I DON'T INTEND TO BRING ANYBODY FROM WHERE I'M AT WAS HIS RESPONSE TO ME.
HE SAID, WE'RE GOING TO WORK WITH THE TEAM WE HAVE LOCALLY. HE SAID, I KNOW FROM SPEAKING TO JARED OR MR. -- CHIEF RIDDELL, THAT WE HAVE AN AMAZING TALENT BASE IN THE DEPARTMENT CURRENTLY.
HE SAID, I'M LOOKING TO MOVE THAT FORWARD UNDER MY LEADERSHIP AND THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY COMMISSION TO PROMOTE FROM WITHIN.
AND THAT RESONATED WITH ME. I'M NOT GOING TO GET INTO
[03:00:03]
THOSE ISSUES FROM PRIOR, BUT THE PRIOR PROCESS EXPOSED THAT AS AN ISSUE. THE SUCCESSION PLANNING WAS NOT THERE. SO, HAVING SAID THAT, I COMPLIMENT THE CITY MANAGER -- JARED, IS HE STILL HERE? JARED, OUTSTANDING JOB. ALL THE PARTICIPANTS IN THIS PROCESS I THINK HAVE COME TO THE SAME CONCLUSION AS TO WHO THE BEST CANDIDATE IS, THOUGH I HAVEN'T HEARD FROM THE MAYOR YET. HAVING HAD SAID THAT, I DO SUPPORT THE SELECTION AND WILL WORK DILIGENTLY FROM THE COMMISSION LEVEL TO BE SURE THAT HE'S GOT THE SUPPORT THAT HE NEEDS AND THE INPUT THAT HE NEEDS FROM THIS BODY MOVING FORWARD.>> GOOD. SO, COMMANDER SMITH, I FOUND OUT, IS, KIND OF, EQUAL TO CHIEF OF POLICE.
IT'S A DIVISION. IT'S THE WAY THE GOVERNMENT WORKS. IT'S KIND OF A COUNTY -- IT'S A COUNTY AREA, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY. SO, HE'S BASICALLY BEEN A CHIEF IN HIS JOB AND DONE BUDGETING. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT HE TOLD ME -- SHARED WITH ME -- IS THAT ONE TIME IN HIS CAREER, HE DID HR TOTALLY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT.
>> YES. AND I THINK THAT THAT SAYS A LOTLOT SOMEBODY BUILDING A TEAM AND BUILDING -- KNOWING HOW TO MANAGE THE HUMAN COMPONENT OF A JOB. AND HE'S VERY, VERY, VERY EXPERIENCED IN THAT, BROAD EXPERIENCE. ALL THE CANDIDATES HAD BROAD EXPERIENCE. I DID -- ONE OF MY FIRST QUESTIONS TO MR. SMITH WAS, I GUESS YOU UNDERSTAND, YOU'RE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THERE'S A STRONG PULL FOR THE INTERNAL CANDIDATE, AND I'D LIKE TO KNOW YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT. I'D LIKE TO KNOW -- AND HE SAID I WOULD BE SURPRISED IF THAT WASN'T THERE.
I WOULD BE VERY SURPRISED. AND HE SAID PRETTY MUCH WHAT YOU SAID, THAT HE -- FROM HIS OBSERVATION, THIS IS A SOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND HE IS GOING TO BUILD AND WORK WITH THE TALENT THAT HE HAS HERE AND THE SKILL AND THE EXPERIENCE. AND HE WAS VERY, VERY HIGH ON THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND I FOUND HIM TO BE THE ONLY CANDIDATE THAT NOT ONLY HAD READ THE REPORT BUT WAS AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HAD RESPONDED AND WAS AWARE OF THE RESPONSES.
>> SO, HE HAD DONE SOME EXTENSIVE HOMEWORK ON OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS OUR CITY.
AND I THOUGHT THAT HE -- I'M SURPRISED YOU DIDN'T MENTION THIS, CURTIS JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER JOHNSON -- BUT HE'S DATA DRIVEN, HE TOLD ME.
HE USED THAT PHRASE. AND THAT REMINDED ME OF YOU.
HE DOES A LOT OF COLLECTING OF DATA, ANALYZING OF DATA, AND FOCUSING RESOURCES WHERE THAT DATA SHOWS.
AND SO -- AND I THINK THAT HE WAS VERY APPRECIATIVE OF THE PUBLIC PROCESSPROCESS AND THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE COMMUNITY. I TALKED TO HIM A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE COMMUNITY IN THIS PROCESS AND ALSO THE FACT -- THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IS OUR LARGEST DEPARTMENT. IT'S OUR BIGGEST -- IT TAKES OUR BIGGEST RESOURCES, AND WE ALWAYS WANT TO GIVE IT MORE RESOURCES SO THAT HOW IMPORTANT IT WAS TO US FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO BE IN GOOD SHAPE TO MAKE THE CITY IN GOOD SHAPE. SO, I, TOO, AGREE WITH THIS CHOICE. AND I WOULD LIKE TO ALSO SAY THAT OVER THE WEEKEND, I HAD A CHANCE TO BE INVOLVED WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ON SATURDAY AT THE SANTA TRAIN AND ON SUNDAY AT THE SIGHTS AND SOUNDS PARADE. AND I BELIEVE THAT THIS COMMUNITY NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS POLICE DEPARTMENT SAY VERY HIGHLY PROFESSIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND THERE ARE MANY, MANY OFFICERS WHO HAVE A LOT OF TRAINING AND ARE REALLY FIRST CLASS. AND OUR DEPARTMENT -- AND SOME OF THE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN SAID IN THE PAST FEW MEETINGS HAVE -- MAY HAVE LED SOMEBODY TO BELIEVE THAT THAT IS NOT SO.
BUT TO OBSERVE WHAT HASHAS WITH OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT IN TERMS OF -- AND WITH THE INTERIM CHIEF RIDDELL HAS DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB. AND THEY'VE CONTINUED TO DO THEIR JOBS. THEY ARE PROFESSIONALS.
THEY HAVE CONTINUED THEIR WORK. AND I AM PROFOUNDLY GRATEFUL FOR THAT PROFESSIONALISM AND THAT
[03:05:04]
SENSE OF EXCELLENCE THROUGH ALL THE TURMOIL IN TERMS OF WHAT WE WENT THROUGH THE BUDGET, WE WENT THROUGH ALL THE SEVERAL THINGS THAT WE HAVE BEEN THROUGH AS A CITY.OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS STAYED A PROFESSIONAL, WELL- EXECUTED POLICE DEPARTMENT.
AND I, FOR ONE, AM VERY APPRECIATIVE OF THAT.
SO, WITH THAT, ARE WE DOING A MOTION, A VOTE? ARE WE ASKING FOR A VOTE, MS. COX, A VOTE OF APPROVAL?
>> WOULD SOMEBODY LIKE TO MAKE THAT MOTION?
>> I WOULD BE HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION. I WOULD MOTION TO APPROVE THE SELECTION OF DAVID SMITH AS THE NEXT CHIEF IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY MANAGER CHESS' RECOMMENDATION.
>> THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND. CALL THE ROLE, PLEASE.
>> CAN I JUST -- WANT TO PUT A BOW ON THIS.
>> I WANT TO THANK -- OUR CONSULTANT, WHO PERFORMED THE RECRUITMENT, DID A LOT OF LEGWORK.
MY DEPUTY CITY MANAGER DID AN EXCELLENT JOB TO HELP MANAGE THE PROCESS WITH THE HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR. ALSO THE FORMER CHIEF, CHIEF BALDWIN AND CAPTAIN AND CHIEF SANDFORD AS WELL FOR BEING ON THE PANEL. AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, CHIEF RIDDELL FOR KEEPING THINGS COASTED AND GOING THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
HE KNOWS I HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF RESPECT FOR HIM AND HIS POLICE TEAM.
I WANT TO LET YOU KNOW HE AND I HAVE A WAY OF COMMUNICATING.
I HOPE HE CAN, SORT OF, HELP MR. SMITH OR CHIEF SMITH IS -- AT LEAST FOR THE PAST SEVEN MONTHS AND I THINK WE GET ALONG QUITE WELL.
HE KNOWS THE BUTTONS TO PUSH AND THE BUTTONS NOT TO PUSH.
I THINK THAT GOES A LONG WAY. I WANT TO THANK THE UNION REPRESENTATIVES WHO ATTENDED THE AND GREET.
I HOPE I GET YOUR NAMES RIGHT. OFFICER -- AND TRAUTMAN. THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO GO THERE.
THEY COULD HAVE BEEN TICKED OFF, NOT SHOW UP AT ALL.
EVEN ACTING DEPUTY CHIEF -- CAME OUT AS WELL.
THAT OSHOWED HIS PROFESSIONAL. AND THE UNION REPS, THEY WERE THERE THE ENTIRE WELL FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE VERY END. AND THEY SPOKE WITH ALL -- I'M NOT TALKING ONE OR TWO. YOU'RE TALKING SEVEN OR EIGHT.
THEY WENT FROM TABLE TO TABLE. I RESPECT THEM FOR THAT.
I UNDERSTAND WHAT THEIR NEEDS ARE.
AND I WILL SAY THIS, I BELIEVE THAT MR. SMITH IS THE RIGHT CHOICE.
AND I APPRECIATE EVERYONE WHO JUST PARTICIPATED, WHETHER YOU AGREE WITH ME OR NOT. THAT'S YOUR RIGHT.
THAT'S WHAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS ALL ABOUT.
I'M SUPPOSED TO STAY HERE, SIT IN THIS SEAT, AND LISTEN TO WHAT THE CONCERNS ARE, AND DO MY BEST TO MOVE THE CITY FORWARD.
I HOPE YOU'RE WILLING TO WORK WITH ME AS WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE TRANSITION. BUT I WANT TO THANK THE POLICE TEAM. THEY HAVE MY COMPLETE SUPPORT. WHEN IT COMES TO MAKING DECISIONS, I WANT TO BE A PART OF THAT TO ENSURE THAT THE DECISIONS BEING MADE ARE REFLECTIVE OF WHAT YOU WANT ON THIS DAIS. THAT'S WHAT I'M HERE FOR.
THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT IN MY SELECTION. CERTAINLY WE HAVE A LONG WAY TO GO, YOU KNOW, THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING, AS THEY SAY. BUT I BELIEVE WE HAVE A VERY STRONG CANDIDATE. AND I THANK YOU ALL FOR UNANIMOUSLY APPROVING MY SELECTION.
>> MR. CHESS, ARE YOU GOING TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH HIM IMMEDIATELY?
>> YES. I WAS GOING TO LET THE CITY ATTORNEY SPEAK TO THAT AS WELL BECAUSE WE TALKED ABOUT THAT GOING FORWARD, WHAT THE PROCESS IS GOING FORWARD. WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT NEGOTIATIONS. I WAS GOING TO DO THAT, BUT WE TALKED ABOUT IT.
>> MADAM MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS, I HAVE SPOKEN WITH MR. CHESS AND THE -- MANAGER ON THE PROCESS.
THE TERMS OF HIS CONTRACT WILL BE NEGOTIATED.
THERE IS A STANDARD TO WORK OFF OF FROM THE PRIOR CHIEF'S CONTRACT. THERE WERE SOME UPDATES WHEN WE DID MR. CHESS' CONTRACT, SO WE'LL IMPLEMENT THOSE AS NEEDED. BUT WE'LL NEGOTIATE THOSE TERMS. MR. CHESS' INTENT IS TO BRING THAT CONTENT ONCE IN FINAL FORM TO APPROVAL THAT CONTRACT.
>> MY SUGGESTION IS, LET'S GET IT
DONE. >> HOPEFULLY IN THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE WORKING ON.
[12. City Commission Boards and Committees Updates]
>> THE NEXT ITEM IS THE CITY COMMISSION BOARD AND COMMITTEE
UPDATES. >> WHO WOULD LIKE TO START?
>> I'LL START. SO, I WANTED TO -- WE HAD A VERY INTERESTING TPO MEETING, AND MOST TPO MEETINGS ARE NOT VERY
INTERESTING. >> WHAT? THOSE WORDS ARE NOT USUALLY TOGETHER.
>> THAT'S TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION. WE USE A LOT OF ACRONYMS AND PLAN OUT TO 2050 AND ALL THAT STUFF ABOUT ROADS AND STUFF. PEOPLE USUALLY FALL ASLEEP AFTER WE GAVEL IN. BUT THIS WAS MY LAST MEETING AS THE CHAIR OF THIS COMMITTEE. BUT I WANT TO BRING THIS TO YOUR ATTENTION. THERE WERE A COUPLE OF THINGS.
THERE'S A BIG DEVELOPMENT DOWN THERE THAT'S HEADED UP BY
[03:10:02]
THE ASHLEY CAPITAL GROUP.AND THEY'RE REALLY TRYING TO GET ONTO OUR LONG- RANGE PLANNING PROCESS. AND IT HAS TO DO WITH ROADWAY NETWORKS DOWN THERE. SO, IT'S A HOT TOPIC.
WE'VE SUGGESTED THEY GO BACK TO THE CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE FIRST BECAUSE THEY WERE ASKING THE BOARD TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVAL OF THIS. SO, IT GOT A LITTLE CONTENTIOUS AT THAT POINT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WITH THAT. FURTHER WITH THAT, THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM.
GUESS WHAT CAME UP WITH THAT, WAS THE RAILROAD.
WE HAD A VERY LIVELY DISCUSSION ABOUT RAILROAD, FREIGHT TRAFFIC, ET CETERA. VERY LIVELY. AND I CAN TELL YOU THAT I'VE ASKED FOR THIS TO BE PUT ON OUR AGENDA WITH THE COUNTY --
>> OKAY. >> -- BECAUSE THE COUNTY AND THE COMMISSIONERS, THEY WERE DUG IN ON, NO WAY, WE'RE MOVING THAT TRAIN WEST. THERE ARE CONCERNS ABOUT BLOCKING OF TRAFFIC AND EVACUATION ROUTES AND TRAIN TRAFFIC. IT GOT CONTENTIOUS.
IT WAS -- IT WAS TOUGH. I HAD TO SPEAK UP, AND I LEVERAGED UP ON THIS TO THEM TO AT LEAST SAY, HEY, WE ARE NOW TRYING TO SEE IF WE'RE GOING TO PUT MONEY BEHIND A STUDY, JUST MONEY TO ALLOCATE FOR A STUDY TO SEE WHAT THIS IMPACT IS. SO, IT'S -- IT'S A LIVELY DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS TRAIN. THEY UNDERSTAND OUR CONCERN AND WANTING TO GET THIS STUFF FROM DOWNTOWN. THEY CAN AGREE WITH. BUT WHERE TO GO, WE COULDN'T COME TO ANY KIND OF CONSENSUS.
AND WE COULDN'T EVEN COME TO A CONSENSUS ON DO WE WANT TO PUT MONEY TOWARD A STUDY. WE ASKED MR. -- TO COME BACK WITH PARAMETERS OF IF WE GAVE YOU 50,000, COULD THAT GET SOMETHING DONE OR WHATEVER? SO, WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS THIS AS A COUNTY AND WHEN WE HAVE OUR MEETING WITH THEM.
>> I THINK WE HAVE A COUPLE OF
DAYS. >> WE'VE GOT A LOT OF THINGS GOING. I NEEDED TO BRING THIS FROM THE TPO BECAUSE THIS WAS THE MOST PASSIONATE MEETING I HAVE EVER BEEN A PART OF IN FIVE
>> IT WAS EXCITING. SO, OTHER THAN THAT, COMING UP ON MY LAST MEETING AS THE -- NO, I SERVED MY LAST. NO. FIRE BOARD.
FIRE BOARD IS COMING UP. ONE MORE MEETING COMING UP WITH THE FIRE BOARD. THIS WILL BE MY LAST AS THE CHAIR. RIGHT NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT EXTENDING THE CONTRACT OF CURRENT CHIEF.
SO, WE'RE GETTING READY TO HAVE SOME CONVERSATION WITH THAT. I ALSO WANT TO PUBLICLY SAY TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT THANK YOU TO ALL THEY DO DURING THE THANKSGIVING AND CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS TO MAKE SURE THAT FAMILIES HAVE FOOD, KIDS HAVE TOYS. THEY'LL HAVE A BIG PRESENCE IN THAT AND OPERATIONALIZE A BIG, BIG PROCESS OF MAKING SURE THAT THE, YOU KNOW, OUR COMMUNITY IS SAFE AND THAT THEY'RE STILL RESPONDING.
SO, THOSE ARE TWO BOARDS I HAVE REPORTS ON NOW. OH. I JUST GOT A NOTICE THAT THE COURT ADVISORY BOARD WILL BE MEETING ON THE 18TH.
AND PART OF OUR LAST PLAN WAS TO TALK ABOUT THE HARBOR POINT PARK AND PLANS FOR THAT AND TYING INTO THE PORT. SO, LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS MEETING IN DECEMBER. THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO REPORT.
>> I'LL GO. CURT, DO YOU WANT TO -- OKAY.
SO, I'LL FOLLOW UP ON CURTIS' COMMENTS ON THE TPO MEETING. I'M A MEMBER OF THE TPO AS WELL.
I THINK AS THE CHAIRMAN, HE WAS THROWING SPIT BALLS AT ME BECAUSE I BROUGHT UP MY FAVORITE TERMS ABOUT FEC.
AS YOU KNOW, MY RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM IS NOT -- WE'RE NOT ON EACH OTHERS' CHRISTMAS CARD LISTS, AND I GAVE AN EARFUL. IT'S A GOOD THING THE MEDIA WASN'T THERE THAT DAY, TO THE POINT EVERYONE WAS LIKE, OKAY, WE GET IT, WE GET IT, CALM DOWN. I AGREE WITH CURTIS' ASSESSMENT AS TO THE OUTCOME OF THAT MEETING AND THAT THIS WHOLE THING ABOUT MOVING THAT ISSUE WEST, OUR PARTNERS AT THE COUNTY AREN'T EXACTLY THRILLED ABOUT THIS.
SO, THIS IS GOING TO BE PROBLEMATIC MOVING FORWARD.
THERE IS NO SOLUTION ON THE TABLE AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED. AND THEY ASKED ME -- YOU SAID, YOU'VE MET WITH THESE FOLKS.
YEAH, I'VE MET WITH THEM. I WAS BEING LECTURED TO.
AND ONCE I WAS LECTURED TO, I SAID, OKAY, I'M DONE. I'M OUT OF HERE.
>> YOU WEREN'T AN EQUAL IN THEIR
EYES. >> WAS JUST GOING TO BE TOLD WHAT THEY INTENDED TO DO. I WAS LUCKY TO BE INVITED.
I GUESS THEY NEEDED SOMEBODY TO TAKE THEIR BEATING TO, SO THEY PICKED ME. SUFFICE TO SAY, I BELIEVE THERE HAS TO BE A WORK AROUND ON THIS WITH OUR COUNTY PARTNERS AND WE HAVE TO COME UP WITH A SOLUTION.
I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS BEING -- THEY'RE GOING THROUGH THIS PROCESS NOW TO GET THIS, IN THEORY, THIS NEW FACILITY PERMITTED AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO RUN STRAIGHT INTO A WALL.
AND THAT'S WHAT THE INTENTION IS FROM OUR COUNTY PARTNERS, ET CETERA. I UNDERSTAND THAT.
WE DON'T WANT IT HERE. THEY DON'T WANT IT THERE.
I'M NOT SURE HOW THIS IS GOING OUT, BUT THERE IS NO SOLUTION ON THE TABLE, SO IT HAS TO BE MOVED FORWARD.
THE OTHER THING I'LL REPORT ON BECAUSE I BELIEVE IT'S IMPORTANT -- I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE TOO MUCH TIME HERE -- IS THAT THE PARKING COMMITTEE --
[03:15:02]
I MENTION PARKING, EVERYBODY GOES TO SLEEP, LIKE THE TPO MEETINGS. BUT THE PARKING COMMITTEE REVISITED THIS PAY TO PARK PROGRAM. SHAWN FROM CODE ENFORCEMENT -- HE'S NOT HERE ANY LONGER -- HE GAVE A SPECIFIC -- HE'S GONE INTO THE MINUTIAE ON THIS AND GAVE A VERY DETAILED REPORT ON THEIR INCREASED PERCENTAGE ON THE INCOME STREAM, OUR DIMINISHED INCOME ON THE PROJECTED INCOME STREAM, ET CETERA. AND WE'RE LOOKING AT ALL THE BALANCES AND ALL THE ISSUES HERE.THE PARKING COMMITTEE MEMORIALIZED THIS BY VOTE RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COMMISSION TO KILL THE
>> THIS IS NOT AN AGENDA ITEM TO YET, SO THIS IS NEWS TO EVERYBODY. THE PARKING COMMITTEE CAME OUT TO TERMINATE THE PROGRAM AS UNWORKABLE.
HAVING HAD SAID THAT, I'M SURE IT'S GOING TO BE AGENDA AT SOME POINT IN AND TIME AND COME OUT TO MR. CHESS. I KNOW THAT PARTICULAR PROGRAM HAS HAD SUPPORTERS, MANY DETRACTORS, ET CETERA.
AND IT'S BEEN A HOT BUTTON ISSUE FOR THE COMMISSION. BUT THE PARKING COMMITTEE LOOKED AT THE ANALYTICAL DATA HERE AND SAID, NO, THAT WE CAN'T SUPPORT THIS ANY LONGER. BECAUSE IT'S CHANGED.
IT'S CHANGED SINCE IT WAS ORIGINALLY PRESENTED TO US, BASED ON DOWN SIZING THE PROGRAM, MAKING CHANGES TO THE PROGRAM. THE PERCENTAGE SPLITS WERE CHANGED HORRIFICALLY NOT IN OUR FAVOR. THE MINOR AMOUNT OF MONEY WE'RE GOING TO GENERATE FROM IT IS NOT WORTH THE DISPLACEMENT TO OUR RESIDENTS CANDIDLY.
I SAID, LOOK, YOU GUYS GOT TO DEBATE THIS.
YOU TELL ME WHAT YOU WANT TO DO AND I'LL CARRY IT TO THE COMMISSION. THAT WAS THE OUTCOME.
I DIDN'T WANT TO STEAL THEIR THUNDER.
I KNOW SOMEBODY FROM THE PARKING COMMITTEE WAS GOING TO GIVE YOU A REPORT.
I WANTED YOU TO HAVE A PRECURSOR TO THAT BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE
COMING. >> COMMISSIONER GAINES.
>> THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR AND COMMISSIONER BRODERICK.
WHENEVER THAT DOES COME WITH THIS PARKING COMMITTEE, PLEASE HAVE THAT DUSTED OFF -- AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, DUSTED OFF PROPOSALS OR WHATEVER WE HAD BEFORE.
>> STUDIES. >> THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS WE HAVE REQUESTED IS WE WANT TO DO A DEEP DIVE BACK INTO THOSE PARKING
>> THE PARKING COMMITTEE IS GOING TO GET WELL VERSED IN THIS.
>> THANK YOU, SIR. -- LEAGUE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, WE MET -- WE'RE NOT MEETING THIS MONTH. WE'LL PICK OFFICERS IN JANUARY.
WE MET JUST TALKING ABOUT THE LEGISLATION, WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO WITH ALL THE BILLS AND HOW IT'S GOING TO AFFECT ALL OF THE COUNTIES.
RETIREMENT BOARD, EVERYTHING IS FINE THERE.
WE'RE IN GOOD STANDINGS WITH OUR NUMBERS. AGAIN, EVERY TIME I TALK ABOUT RETIREMENT BOARD, I'M GOING TO LET THEM KNOW THAT THEY SET ME UP THAT LEADERSHIP.
I HOPE THEY'RE LISTENING -- WITH THAT LEADERSHIP CLASS. BUT IT'S VERY INTERESTING.
I'M LEARNING A LOT. SO, CITY OF FORT PIERCE WILL HAVE A GRADUATE OF THE LEADERSHIP CLASS ON THAT BOARD.
COUNCIL OF AGING, THEY'RE IN THE PROCESS OF FINDING A NEW BOARD DIRECTOR. MR. DRUMMOND IS -- LAST DAY IS THE 31ST, I WANT TO SAY, OF THIS MONTH. SO, I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO PUT AN INTERIM IN AND DO A SEARCH FOR A DIRECTOR.
BUT THEY'RE ALWAYS ASKING FOR DONATIONS AND SUPPORT ANY WAY THEY CAN TO HELP THE AGING POPULATION IN OUR AREA.
HOMELESS, YOU HEARD FROM HOMELESS TODAY.
SO, THE SAME THING. AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
WE HAVE A MEETING THIS WEEK, AND THEY SHOULD BE -- IF THEY HAVEN'T, IF I DIDN'T MISS IT, IT COULD BE ONE ON ONE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA OF THE MEETING I WASN'T HERE. THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO SUBMIT THEIR ANNUAL REPORT. IF NOT, IT WILL BE COMING SOON.
BUT WE MEET ON THE 18TH. AND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, THERE WAS A BREAKFAST THIS MORNING, BUT I FIGURED I NEEDED TO BE HERE.
I'M GLAD. >> YOU'RE ON THE BOARD.
>> THE CHAMBER IS HAVING ITS BREAKFAST TOMORROW.
>> THIS WAS A SPECIAL -- THIS WAS A DIFFERENT, GUYS.
I WAS TOLD TO BE THERE THIS MORNING AT 8:00 OR SOMETHING AND I WAS LIKE, I BETTER BE TO THIS
MEETING. >> CAN'T BE IN TWO PLACES AT ONE
THAT'S WHERE WE ARE ON THAT. BUT THOSE ARE -- THOSE ARE MY UPDATES. AND COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, JUST PLEASE REMIND THE -- I DON'T -- WE MIGHT MEET AGAIN BEFORE COMMISSIONER ALEXANDER'S TOY
DRIVE. >> WHERE IS THAT? IS THERE A DATE?
>> I HAVEN'T HEARD A DATE YET, BUT WE HAVE A CITY COMMISSION MEETING NEXT MONDAY.
WE SHALL HAVE SOMETHING BY THEN.
>> THEY HAVEN'T COME TO ME LOOKING FOR MONEY.
[03:20:07]
>> YOU'RE ON RECORD. >> YOU JUST SAID THAT PUBLICLY.
>> I JUST KNOW -- I NEED TO LET THE CHIEF AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT KNOW, I KNOW HOW THE KIDS ENJOY WHEN THE ENGINE COME OUT THERE. SO, THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AT, MAYOR.
GOOD, GOOD. OKAY. SO, I HAVE A MEETING OF FLORIDA MUNICIPAL INSURANCE TRUST THIS COMING FRIDAY.
SO, I WILL BE HAVING INFORMATION ABOUT THAT FOLLOWING THAT MEETING. FPUA, I'D LIKE TO TAKE THIS TIME TO SAY WHAT A GREAT CONTRIBUTION FPUA MAKES TO OUR CHRISTMAS PARADE BECAUSE THEY PROVIDEPROVIDE SANTA, AND THEY PROVIDE -- THEY HAVE -- THEY MAKE SURE THAT THE LIGHTS COME ON WHEN WE HAVE THE COUNTDOWN.
SO, I WANT TO THANK THE FORT PIERCE UTILITIES COMMITTEE.
THEY GOT AN AWARD, AND THE AWARD WAS FOR BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITIES. THERE'S A CULTURE AT THE FPUA WHERE THEY ENCOURAGE EMPLOYEES TO VOLUNTEER IN ALL KINDS OF NON-PROFITS. AND THE PARADE IS JUST ONE OF THE MANY THINGS THEY DO. WE GET A REPORT ONCE A MONTH FROM THE STAFF ABOUT THE VOLUNTEER HOURS AND WHAT KIND OF ORGANIZATIONS THE VOLUNTEERS AT FPUA SUPPORT. SO, THE TREASURE COAST REGION LEAGUE OF CITIES WILL BE MEETING ON THE 17TH OF DECEMBER. AND WE WILL HAVE AS OUR GUEST THE PRESIDENT OF THE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, HOLLY SMITH. AND EVERYBODY IS INVITED ON THE DAIS. IF YOU CAN BE THERE, IT'S -- I CAN'T THINK OF THE NAME OF THE RESTAURANT --
>> WE SHOULD HAVE THAT PUT ON OUR CALENDAR.
>> I CAN YOU ALL HAD A CONFLICT.
>> EVERYBODY EXCEPT THE MAYOR.
>> YOUR WEDNESDAYS ARE -- DATEBOOKS ARE FULL,
EXACTLY. AND OF COURSE THE FIRE DISTRICT WILL BE ELECTING HOW OFFICERS -- I THINK IT GOES TO THE COUNTY
NO, ACTUALLY THE CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE.
>> AND WITH THAT, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK MAIN STREET AND KIWANIS AND OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT AND EVERYONE WHO WORKED ALL YEAR LONG TO MAKE A REALLY GREAT PARADE. ONE OF THE OFFICERS TOLD ME THAT IN HIS ESTIMATION, THIS WAS THE LARGEST CROWD WE'D EVER HAD. AND YOU KNOW, POLICE OFFICERS GET USED TO, SORT OF, ESTIMATING THE CROWD SIZE. AND THE ROUTE, THE NEW ROUTE, I SHARED WITH SOME OF THE MAIN STREET PEOPLE AT THE END OF THE PARADE THAT WE ALL THOUGHT THATTHAT ROUTE WAS A GOOD ADDITION.
SO, ANYWAY, I THINK -- UNLESS THERE'S ANYTHING FURTHER FROM ANYBODY, I THINK WE CAN ADJOURN.
SO, WE'LL
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.