[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:03]
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING OF APRIL 9TH 2026 IS CALLED ORDER. CAN WE PLEASE STAND FOR THE
PLEDGE. >> A PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE PUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE...
LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. IF YOU COULD PLEASE REMAIN
STANDING. >> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
DO TET --'S WERE FROM THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE
[a. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES]
US THE TRUTH? YOU MAY HAVE A SEAT.>> BEFORE WE GET STARTED DOES ANYONE HERE NEED THE ASSISTANCE OF A HEARING DEVICE OR INTERPRETER? IF SO, ONE WILL BE PROVIDED FOR YOU, JUST LET US KNOW.
THIS MORNING IN FRONT OF YOU WE HAVE FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. YOUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE CLERK AND REPRESENTING THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE.
I WILL BE SERVING AS YOUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THIS MORNING.
FOR YOUR BACKGROUND PLEASE NOTE THESE PROCEEDINGS WILL BE LIVE STREAMED AND RECORDED. THOSE OF YOU WHO'VE RECEIVED A CITATION OR VIOLATION WE WILL REFER TO AS RESPONDENTS THIS MORNING AND IT'S IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND HOW THESE PROCEEDINGS WILL UNFOLD. FIRST, THE CITY WILL PREVENT -- PRESENTED'S EVIDENCE -- ITS CASE THROUGH EVIDENCE AND THAT EVIDENCE MAY INCLUDE TESTIMONY OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, INVESTIGATORS, POLICE OFFICERS OR OTHER WITNESSES PICK EVIDENCE MAY INCLUDE PHYSICAL ITEMS SUCH AS PHOTOGRAPHS, WE WILL REFER TO THOSE AS EXHIBITS. THE STANDARD OF PROOF THIS MORNING WHETHER VIOLATION HAS BEEN PROVEN BASED ON COMPETENCES -- SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND YOU AS A RESPONDENT WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE LEGAL OBJECTIONS, CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES IF YOU SO CHOOSE AND -- ONCE THE CITY FINISHED PRESENTING ITS CASE YOU AS A RESPONDENT WILL BE ALLOWED TO MAKE A STATEMENT, PRESENT WITNESS TESTIMONY AND PRESENT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE SUCH AS DOCUMENTS OR PHOTOS.
FROM THERE I AS YOUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WILL RENDER THE FINAL RULING. I JUST ASK THAT EVERYONE CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN A CALM AND RESPECTFUL MANNER AT ALL TIMES DURING THESE PROCEEDINGS. ANY COMMENTS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO ME AS YOUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
[1. BV2025-00228 31 Barracuda Avenue Yes Savannas Ridge LLC Logan Winn]
THAT BEING SAID, MAY WE PLEASE HAVE THE FIRST CASE.>> THE FIRST CASE IS C1 NUMBER BB 20250022 8:30 ONE BARRACUDA AVENUE FOR YES SAVANNAH'S RAGE LLC.
WE MET GOOD MORNING. IF YOU DON'T MIND WOULD YOU PLEASE STAND AT THE PODIUM. AND WHAT'S YOUR NAME?
>> SAMANTHA WARNER. >> HOW DO YOU SPELL YOUR LAST
>> WHAT'S YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMMUNITY?
>> ON THE COMMUNITY MANAGER. >> MR. WINN WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR
I'D CASE NUMBER BV 2025-00228, 31 BARRACUDA AVENUE.
INITIATED AUGUST 28TH, 2025. THE OWNER IS YES SAVANNAS RIDGE LLC OF 3030 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1 FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, 349 34982-6333. VIOLATIONS OF FVC 105-POINT 4.1 .1, 2020 EXPIRED PERMIT. RENEWAL EXPIRED ELECTRICAL PERMIT OR OBTAIN A NEW PERMIT. DOES RECOMMENDATION THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO TURN IT -- OBTAIN A PERMIT. OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED ON THE
ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT... >> THIS IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE
CASE SO THERE'S NO PICTURES. >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE
MS. WARNER TELL ME WHAT'S GOING ON.
>> WHERE BUILDING AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY AT THIS PROPERTY.
THIS ONE IN PARTICULAR AS A STAGING AREA WHERE THEY WERE TRYING TO OBTAIN POWER TO THE STAGING AREA, NO WORK HAS BEEN STARTED OR COMPLETED AT THIS TIME SO IT'S AN OPEN PERMIT THAT NEEDS TO BE CLOSE. WE'VE REACHED OUT TO THE SUBCONTRACTOR AND WE'RE WORKING WITH HIM AS WELL AS HIM WORKING WITH THE CITY TO CLOSE THAT ONE OUT.
[00:05:04]
>> I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION HERE ALLOWING -- TO ALLOW YOU GUYS 60 DAYS TO GET EVERYTHING IN ORDER. DO YOU FIND THAT TO BE A
REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME. >> YES, SIR,.
>> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? ANYTHING FURTHER? IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED OR NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR FIND OF $250 PER DAY WITH THE ASSISTS. YOU'VE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL THE DECISION IF YOU SO CHOOSE. NEXT CASE PLEASE.
[2. BV2025-00233 69 Sunfish Ave Yes Savannas Ridge LLC Logan Winn]
>> OUR NEXT CASE IS C2 BV2025-00233, 69 SUNFISH AVENUE.
YES SAVANNAS RIDGE LLC. >> WELCOME BACK.
MR. WINN, WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME?
>> CASE NUMBER BV2025-00233, 69 SUNFISH AVENUE.
CASE WAS INITIATED AUGUST 28TH, 2025.
OWNER IS YES SAVANNAS RIDGE LLC OF 3030 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1 FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, 34982-6333.
VIOLATIONS FBC 105.4.1.1 (2020) EXPIRED PERMIT.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, RENEW EXPIRED ELECTRICAL PERMIT RELEC-2024-00074 OR OBTAIN A NEW PERMIT.
RECOMMENDATION THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
CURRENTLY THE PERMIT IS STILL EXPIRED.
>> THIS IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE CASE SO THERE ARE NO PICTURES.
>> MISS WARNER WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME HERE?
>> SO WITH BUILDING THE COMMUNITY WE HAVE STARTED OFF WITH A PERMIT CARD WITHOUT POWER ON INSPECTION SO ORIGINALLY THEY WERE HAVING A SUBCONTRACTOR SIGN ON THE MASTER PERMIT TO DO THE ELECTRICAL WHERE WE HAD -- THERE WAS A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT HOLD TO HAVE A POWER ON INSPECTION SEPARATE OUTSIDE.
SINCE THEN WE HAVE ALL OF THAT PUT ON TILL ONE MASTER PERMIT.
THIS WAS A CASE WHERE WE HAVE A CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY ON THIS HOME. HOWEVER THAT SECONDARY ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS STILL OPEN SO WE WERE WORKING WITH THE SUBCONTRACTOR TO GET WITH THE CITY TO SEE IF WE CAN EITHER HAVE THAT REINSPECTED OR IF IT NEEDS TO BE CLOSED OUT AND HOW
TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT. >> UNDERSTOOD.
SO THE CITY IS RECOMMENDING 60 DAYS FOR YOU TO GET THIS IN ORDER. DO YOU FIND THAT TO BE
REASONABLE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE? >> YES.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER FOR ME? >> NO.
>> IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING A VIOLATION HAS -- TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED.
COMPLY WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE OTHER ALL -- VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR FIND OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. YOU'VE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL BUT I THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN AND GIVING MERE PROGRESS AND IN ADVANCE FOR GIVING US COMP COMPLIANCE.
[3. BV2025-00251 412 Farmers Market Rd Ft Pierce Industrial Plaza LLC Michael Waldrop]
NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> OUR NEXT CASE IS C3 CASE NUMBER BV2025-00251 FOR 12 FARMERS' MARKET ROAD.
FT PIERCE INDUSTRIAL PLAZA LLC. >> WHAT IS YOUR NAME?
>> ASHLEY LUDLOW. >> WOULD YOU PLEASE SPELL YOUR
>> EXCELLENT. MR. WALDROP WHAT YOU HAVE.
>> GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS MICHAEL WALDROP.
I'M AN INSPECTOR OF FORT PIERCE. WERE HERE FOR CASE NUMBER BV2025-00251, FOR 12 FARMERS' MARKET ROAD.
THIS CASE WAS INITIATED SEPTEMBER 4TH AND CAME AS A REPORT FROM FIRE DEPARTMENT THAT THERE WAS A FIRE THERE.
WE INVESTIGATED IT FROM THERE. THE OWNER IS FT PIERCE INDUSTRIAL PLAZA LLC, 3800 GALT OCEAN DR UNIT 207. FT LAUDERDALE FL 33308. THE VIOLATIONS ARE IPMC
[00:10:14]
304.1.1.5 (2021) EXTERIOR UNSAFE CONDITIONS (5), IPMC 304.4 (2021) EXTERIOR STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, IPMC (2021) EXTERIOR WALLS. CORRECTIVE ACTION IS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY REPAIRS TO MAKE THE STRUCTURE SAVE AGAIN. IT'S RECOMMENDED THE OCCUPANTS VACATE THE STRUCTURE UNTIL THE CONDITION IS REMEDIED.TWO, OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR OR PLACE ALL DAMAGED EXTERIOR STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. THREE, OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR OR REPLACE DAMAGED EXTERIOR WALLS.
THE RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
AT THIS POINT THERE HAVE BEEN NO PERMITS FOR ANY WORK.
>> MS. LEDLOW HAVE YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THESE
>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO? >> WE CAN GO THROUGH THEM.
>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THEM BEFORE?
>> ABOUT THE BUILDING REGULARLY, I KNOW IT LOOKS LIKE.
>> EXCELLENT. >> YOU'VE PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS DATED SEPTEMBER 4TH OF LAST YEAR, DID YOU TAKE THESE
>> DO THEY TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU'VE
>> THE CITY... >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE.
>> MR. WALDROP THE PHOTOGRAPHS WE HAVE WERE TAKEN FROM OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. WERE YOU ABLE TO GET INSIDE?
>> I WAS NOT ABLE TO GET INSIDE. >> HOW DID YOU COME TO LEARN OF
THIS BUILDING? >> FIRE DEPARTMENT SENSE REPORT
OF FIRES AND WAS GIVEN TO ME. >> THANK YOU.
NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> MS. LEDLOW, WHAT IS YOUR
RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY. >> PROPERTY MANAGER.
>> THANK YOU. TELL ME WHAT'S GOING ON HERE.
>> OBVIOUSLY THE BUILDING CAUGHT ON FIRE.
WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH NOT ONLY OUR ENGINEER BUT THE INSURANCE COMPANY TO SETTLE OUT THE INSURANCE CLAIM WHICH JUST SETTLED AT THE END OF MARCH. WE HAVE AN ENGINEERING REPORT OF THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE BUILDING AND WE ARE CURRENTLY ENGAGED WITH THE CONTRACTOR TO GET PREY -- PRICING TO REPLACE THE EXTERIOR WALLS AND WHATEVER NEEDS TO BE REPLACED AS PER THE
ENGINEER'S REPORT. >> MAY I ASK OUT OF CURIOSITY WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE BUILDING?
>> IT'S JUST A WAREHOUSE IF IT'S CURRENTLY VACANT SO THERE'S
NOBODY IN THERE. >> EXCELLENT.
YOU READ MY MIND. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE HE WANTED
TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? >> NO.
>> I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION HERE FOR 60 DAYS.
DO YOU FIND THAT REASONABLE? >> YES TO OBTAIN A PERMIT,
MR. WALDROP IS THERE ANY FURTHER YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY
>> EXCELLENT. IN THAT CASE IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TOOK TURN OF -- OBTAIN A PERMIT.
OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. MS. LEDLOW, YOU'VE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE BUT THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN AND
[10. BV2025-00314 3320 Monterrey Sq Unit 103 Magnolia Sq of Ft Pierce HOA Inc. Frank Remling]
GETTING THIS RECTIFIED. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR
NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> FOUR SEE NUMBER 10 CASE NUMBER BV2025-00253. 3320 MONTEREY UNIT --
>> GOOD MORNING SIR. WHAT IS YOUR NAME?
>> JOE MCGILVRAY. >> ADDUCED BUT -- SPELL YOUR
>> WHAT'S YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY?
>> AS OF 12 DAYS AGO I'M THE HL A PRESIDENT FOR MAGNOLIA SQUARE.
>> CONGRATULATIONS. EXCELLENT.
WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME? >> MY NAME IS FRANK RAMBLING.
I WORK AS THE INVESTIGATOR AN INSPECTOR.
CASE NUMBER BV2025-00314, 3320 MONTERREY SQ UNIT 103.
[00:15:07]
CASE INITIATED NOVEMBER 5TH 2025.THE OWNER IS MAGNOLIA SQ OF FT PIERCE HOA INC, 333 17TH STREET SUITE A VERO BEACH FL 34960. VIOLATIONS ARE FBC 105.1 (2020) PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR OR REPLACE THE DAMAGED EXTERIOR PORCH WALL BETWEEN UNITS AND REPLACE MISSING OR DAMAGED SIDING ON THESE WALLS. THE CITY -- RECOMMENDATION.
THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. AND AS OF RIGHT NOW THERE HAS NOT -- THERE'S NO PERMIT FOR THIS WORK.
I DO HAVE SOME PICTURES. OF THE WALL THAT'S BEING DESCRIBED. YOU SEEN THE WALL?
>> SURE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THESE PICTURES BEFORE THEY ARE HANDED OUT?
>> YOU CAN HAND THEM OUT. >> MR. RAMBLING YOU PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? DID THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION AS HE OBSERVED IT.
>> YES, THEY DO. >> EVIDENCE DEPOSIT ONE...
>> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE
>> AND MR. REMLING, IS IT -- WHAT IN THE PICTURE IS THE.
>> THE WALL IN BETWEEN THE UNITS THERE.
YOU CAN SEE THE BARE WALLS AND THE SIDING CAME OFF OF IT.
THE EXPOSED WOODWORK. >> MR. GILREATH, TELL ME WHAT'S
GOING ON. >> AS YOU SEE IN THE PICTURES THERE, I GUESS THE FRONT -- I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'D CALL IT FACIAL BOARDING OR WHATEVER BUT THAT'S FALLEN OFF THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING. WE DON'T HAVE ANY PERMITS BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN NO WORK STARTED TO TO DATE.
IF THAT'S THE VIOLATION THAT WE'RE DOING WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT, THERE'S NO WORK GOING ON.
AT THESE UNITS CURRENTLY. WE HAVE OPEN -- WERE ASKING CONTRACTORS TO COME IN AND GIVE US A BIT.
WE HAVE ONE FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT LIST MCH CONTRACTORS THAT SAY THEY NEED A QUOTE FROM A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FIRST SO YOU HAVE -- GETTING ADVICE FROM HIM AND ONCE WE GET THE PRICES I THINK IS WHEN WE GET THE PERMIT. SO THAT'S KIND OF WHERE WE'RE
ANY RESPONSE FROM THE CITY? >> NO.
>> SO DO YOU MIND JUMPING BACK TO THAT PREVIOUS SCREEN? WITH THE AGENDA. THANK YOU.
MR. GILREATH, I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION HERE FOR 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT. DO YOU FIND THAT TO BE A
REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME? >> I SUPPOSE SO.
IT DEPENDS ON EXTERNAL VARIABLES.
SUPPOSEDLY, AND AGAIN ON THE JOB 12 DAYS AS PRESIDENT BUT SUPPOSEDLY WE'VE HAD EIGHT CONTRACTORS COMMON IN THE PAST AND SAY THEY'RE NOT GOING TO TOUCH IT FOR FEAR -- I DON'T KNOW, STRUCTURAL WISE IT MIGHT COME DOWN.
MCH PROPOSED THEY OPEN I GUESS WHAT'S CALLED A DEMO PERMIT JUST TO OPEN THE WALLS SO THE ENGINEER CAN COME IN AND SEE.
I FEEL LIKE THAT'S REASONABLE IF THAT CONSTITUTES A PERMIT THAT
WE'RE LOOKING FOR FOR NO. >> I'M INCLINED TO ENTER 60 DAYS. IF, FOR SOME REASON, YOU REACH THE 60 DAYS AND YOU NEED ADDITIONAL TIME, I DON'T MIND YOU REACHING OUT TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT OF ASKING FOR MORE TIME. BUT I'D LIKE TO GET A DEADLINE ON THE BOOKS IF THAT MAKES SENSE.
WONDERFUL. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT
TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? >> NO SIR.
>> ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? THIS COURT FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
[00:20:07]
AND MR. GILREATH, YOU DO HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE.[11. BV2025-00315 3320 Monterrey Sq Unit 102 Magnolia Sq of Ft Pierce HOA Inc. Frank Remling]
AND I DO THINK WE HAVE U.S. THE NEXT CASE COMING UP.MS. LUNA IF YOU COULD CALL THAT. >> NEXT CASES 4C11 CASE NUMBER BV2025-00315 FOR 3320 MONTERREY SQ UNIT 102.
>> THAT IS THE EXACT SAME WALL. IT'S JUST THE OTHER UNIT.
IT'S UNIT A AND B. WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO READ IT
FOR THE RECORD. >> BV2025-00315 AT 3320 MONTERREY SQ UNIT 102 CASE INITIATED NOVEMBER 5TH, 2025.
OWNER MAGNOLIA SQ OF FT PIERCE HOA INC.
33,317TH STREET SUITE A, VERO BEACH FL 34960.
VIOLATION IS BUILDING CODE -- FBC 105.1 (2020) PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR OR REPLACE THE DAMAGED EXTERIOR PORCH WALL BETWEEN UNITS AND REPLACE MISSING AND/OR DAMAGED SIDING ON THESE WALLS. THE RECOMMENDATION IS THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. IT WAS THE SAME, THERE'S NO
PERMIT YET. >> ARE THERE PHOTOS HE WANTED TO
ADMIT AT THIS POINT? >> WHAT'S THAT?
>> DID YOU WANT TO ADMIT PHOTOS ON THIS ONE? MR. GILREATH, JUST TO BE SURE DO YOU WANT TO SEE THESE
>> THANK YOU. >> MR. REMLING THESE WERE DATED NOVEMBER 3RD. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOS -- IN
VIOLATION AS YOU OBSERVE IT? >> YES, MA'AM,.
>> CITY IN EVIDENCE COMPOSITE ONE.
>> I WILL ACCEPT THIS AND EVIDENCE AS CITY COMPOSITE ONE.
>> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY.
>> MR. GILREATH, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANTED TO ADD FOR THIS ONE OR WILL YOU STATE ON YOUR TESTIMONY FROM BEFORE?
>> STAND ON BEFORE. >> FOR THIS ONE DO YOU FIND 60 DAYS TO BE REASONABLE? WONDERFUL? -- WONDERFUL. IN THAT CASE MISSES BACK IF YOU DON'T MIND JUMPING BACK TO THE AGENDA.
THANK YOU. THIS COURT FINDS THAT A VIOLATION DOES EXIST AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
AND MR. GILREATH YOU DO HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE BUT THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN THIS MORNING AND IN ADVANCE FOR
GETTING THIS RECTIFIED. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[2. 24-1111 2308 Georgia Ave DJL10 LLC Elizabeth Beck]
>> CONGRATULATIONS AGAIN. NEXT CASE PLEASE.
>> THE NEXT CASES FIVE A 224-11-1123 '08 GEORGIA AVENUE.
WHAT IS YOUR NAME. >> CHRISTIAN.
ON THE PROPERTY MANAGER. >> CHRISTIAN LIKE THE RELIGION.
>> WONDERFUL. ALL RIGHT MISSES BACK THE FLOORS
YOURS. >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THIS IS CASE 24-1111. 2308 GEORGIA AVENUE OWNED BY DJL10 LLC AT 14750 SW 172ND ST, MIAMI, FL 33187.
THE VIOLATION WAS FBC 105.1 (2020) PERMIT REQUIRED.
IT CAME BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE IN SEPTEMBER OF 2024 WITH AN ORDER DETERMINING VIOLATION PROVIDING 60 DAYS TO GET A PERMIT.
WHEN A PERMIT WAS NOT OBTAINED, AN AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE
[00:25:02]
WAS PREPARED. NOVEMBER OF 2025.THE OWNER CONTESTED THE FINES AND THE HEARING WAS HELD IN DECEMBER. AND THEN AGAIN IT WAS CONTINUED TO JANUARY WHERE ANOTHER HEARING WAS HELD AND PROVIDED THE OWNER WITH 30 DAYS TO RENEW THE PERMIT.
AND FEBRUARY, A MONTH LATER THE 30 DAYS FEBRUARY THE PERMIT HAD NOT BEEN RENEWED AND ANOTHER AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED. THEY RESPONDED AGAIN FOR THE MASSEY NOTIFICATION. SO THAT'S WHAT THE HEARING IS THIS MORNING. WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE FINES STAYED WHILE THE PERMITS ARE ACTIVE.
THE PERMIT WAS RENEWED ON FEBRUARY 17TH, 2026 AND THEY
ARE HERE FOR THE HEARING TODAY. >> THANK YOU MISSES BACK.
TO BE CLEAR IS THERE CURRENTLY A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CITY?
THE CITY RECOMMENDS THAT THE FINES BE -- SORRY ABOUT THAT.
RECOMMENDATION IS THE CITY'S DAY THE ACCRUAL OF FINES STARTING TODAY AND WHILE THERE ARE ACTIVE PERMITS. IF EITHER PERMIT IS NOT PROPERLY CLOSED, FINES WILL RESUME UPON EXPIRATION OF THE PERMITS.
>> THANK YOU. ANYTHING FURTHER FROM EQUALLY.
>> NO. >> MR. CHRISTIAN, TELL ME WHAT'S
GOING ON. >> IT'S ALL ABOUT THECONTRACTOR.
DR. LEFT HERE THE LAST TIME WE MADE THE HARD CALL OF GETTING RID OF HIM AND LEFT WITH $61,000.
THAT'S WHY AMASSED -- HERE I'M ASKING THE COURT IF THEY CAN FIND SOME LENIENCY SO FORGET A NEW CONTRACTOR, WORKING ON THE WINDOWS SO WE CAN INSTALL ON THE SIDE -- WERE REALLY TRYING.
>> TO BE CLEAR ALL OF THESE DELAYS I'M SEEING HERE WERE
CAUSED BY THIS ONE CONTRACTOR. >> THIS ONE CONTRACTOR FROM
MIAMI. >> HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN
WORKING WITH A NEW CONTRACTOR? >> IT'S BEEN TWO AND A HALF MONTHS IF HE ALREADY DID ALL OF THOSE THINGS.
>> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? ANYTHING FROM THE CITY? I WILL ENTER AN ORDER STAYING THE ACCRUAL OF FINES STARTING TODAY WHILE THERE ARE ACTIVE PERMITS. BUT MR. CHRISTIAN, JUST KNOW IF EITHER PERMIT IS NOT PROPERLY CLOSED, THE FINES WILL RESUME UPON EXPIRATION OF THOSE PERMITS.
BUT THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN AND EXPLAINING TO ME WHAT'S GOING ON. EXCELLENT.
[12. BV2025-00319 508 Holly Ave Unit B Martin County Properties LLC Frank Remling]
NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS C12 BV2025-00319 FOR 508 HOLLY AVE UNIT B.
MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTIES LLC. SHE DID NOT GET SWORN IN.
PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. PLEASE AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH.
YOU MAY PUT YOUR HANDS DOWN. >> FOR BEING LATE.
>> IT'S QUITE ALL RIGHT. I SAW WHAT THE WEATHER WAS LIKE, I'M GLAD YOU MADE IT SAFELY. WHAT'S HER NAME?
>> AND MARTIN. >> MS. MARTIN, WHAT'S YOUR
RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY? >> OWNER.
>> THANK YOU. MR. REMLING, TELL ME WHAT'S
GOING ON. >> THIS CASE IS BV2025-00319, 508 HOLLY AVE UNIT B. CASE INITIATED NOVEMBER 10TH 2025. OWNER MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTIES LLC. 265 BERMUDA BEACH DR, FT PIERCE FL 34949. VIOLATION IPMC 304.6 (2021) EXTERIOR WALLS, IPMC 304.7 (2021) ROOFS AND DRAINAGE, IPMC 305.3 (2021) INTERIOR SURFACES, IPMC 504.1 (2021) PLUMBING — GENERAL. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR OR REPLACE DAMAGED EXTERIOR WALLS.
NUMBER 2, OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR OR REPLACE THE DAMAGED ROOF. NUMBER 3, REPAIR HOLES THAT ARE
[00:30:02]
IN THE DRYWALL. NUMBER 4 REPAIR OR REPLACE ALL DAMAGED, OBSTRUCTED OR LEAKING PLUMBING FIXTURES.THE RECOMMENDATION IS THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
THERE IS A REINSPECTION BUT NO ITEMS WERE COMPLIED AND I DO
HAVE SOME PICTURES. >> WHEN'S THE LAST TIME YOU WERE
THERE? >> I HAVE ANOTHER CASE FOR WINDOWS. I DON'T HAVE THE FOLDER.
BUT I DID KNOW -- IT'S ALL DONE. THE ONLY THING WE HAVE LEFT TO DO IS THE PLUMBING. EVERY SINGLE THING, THE OUTSIDE, EXTERIOR WITH THE PLUMBING THERE WAS A LEAKING --
>> WE WILL TAKE YOUR TESTIMONY AND A MOMENT.
BUT IN TERMS OF THESE PHOTOS, ARE YOU OBJECTING TO THESE
PHOTOS BEING PRESENTED? >> I'M SORRY.
>> ARE YOU OBJECTING TO THESE PHOTOS BEING PRESENTED INTO
EVIDENCE? >> WHAT YOU DO IS YOU CALL -- FOR ME TO GO UP THERE TO LOOK [INAUDIBLE]
>> MR. REMLING THE PHOTOS YOU PASSED UP OR DATED NOVEMBER 7TH OF LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS?
>> YES, MA'AM,. >> DOES IT ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS HE OBSERVED THEM ON THAT DAY.
>> YES, THEY DO. >> CITY MOVES IN EVIDENCE.
>> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE OF CITIES COMPOSITE
ONE. >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE
YOU WERE SAYING THAT THESE PHOTOS ARE NOT ACCURATE AS IT
STANDS NOW. >> THERE WAS A TENANT IN THERE FOR EIGHT YEARS. SHE DID NOT CALL US FOR ANYTHING GOING ON IN THE PROPERTY. BECAUSE WE WOULD HAVE -- I HAVE A GOOD RAPPORT WITH THE CITY. IF ANYTHING HAPPENS I PERSONALLY TELL THE TENANTS BEFORE GETS WORSE CALL US SO WE CAN FIX IT.
SHE STOPPED PAYING HER RENT, WE ENDED UP EVICTING HER.
SHE WOULD'VE HAD TO MOVE ANYWAY HOW IT LOOKS.
SO WE DID NOT KNOW. WE DON'T INSPECTOR PROPERTIES WHICH IS A SHAME, JUST REALLY BUSY BUT EVERYTHING IS COMPLETELY REDID THE WHOLE INSIDE.
THE OUTSIDE. ALL THE WALLS ON HOLES ARE FIXED. AND THE ONLY THING LEFT IS WE NEED TO HIRE A CONTRACTOR FOR THE PLUMBING WHICH WAS THE FAUCET, THE SHOWER FAUCET OR SHOWER HANDLE WAS LEAKING.
WE REPLACE THOSE AND I THINK THE SINK FAUCET AND WE HAVE TO PULL A PERMIT FOR THAT. I'M TRYING TO FIND SOMEBODY THAT WILL -- I DIDN'T KNOW YOU HAD TO PULL A PERMIT FOR THE HANDLES AND STUFF. SO THE WORK IS DONE AND I CAN'T FIND SOMEBODY WHO WANTS TO PULL A PERMIT BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T DO THE WORK. THAT'S THE ONLY THING.
AND I COULD SET UP AN INSPECTION.
I WAS TRYING TO WAIT FOR EVERYTHING TO BE DONE AND I DIDN'T REALIZE I COULD CALL FOR EACH ONE AFTER IT WAS COMPLETED.
DO YOU HAPPEN TO HAVE PICTURES WITH YOU OF WHAT EVERYTHING LOOKS LIKE NOW? [INAUDIBLE]
>> THAT'S QUITE ALL RIGHT. IT SOUNDS LIKE AN MR. REMLING, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. IT SOUNDS LIKE AS LONG AS YOU SET UP THAT INSPECTION, WE SHOULD BE FINE.
>> TIME FOR THE PLUMBING PART. >> USUALLY YOU DO EVERYTHING AND THEN WE'LL COME OUT AND INSPECTED ALL AT ONE TIME.
YOU GET THE PLUMBING DONE, GO AHEAD AND CALL.
>> IN THE MEANTIME I WILL SEND PICTURES.
>> YES IF YOU'D LIKE TO DO THAT BUT GENERALLY USUALLY EVERYTHING'S DONE WILL COME UP AND DO WANT INSPECTION.
>> ANY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE INSPECTOR? BECAUSE IT'S UNDER COMPANY NAME. CAN'T PULL IT AS OWNER BUILDER.
[00:35:05]
>> I SEE. >> WE ARE NOT ALLOWED DO THAT.
>> HOPEFULLY YOU CAN OBTAIN SOMEONE SOON.
I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION HERE TO ALLOW YOU 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT. DO YOU FIND THAT TO BE A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME? EXCELLENT.
ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION?
>> NO I APOLOGIZE I DID NOT SEND THE PICTURES RIGHT AFTER THEY WERE FINISHED AND COMPLETED AS OF NOW OF WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.
AND MR. REMLING, ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE OUR -- ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. YOU DO HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE BUT I THINK YOU FOR COMING DOWN AND CRAVING THE
WEATHER THIS MORNING. >> SORRY FOR BEING LATE.
I HATE BEING LATE. >> IT'S QUITE ALL RIGHT.
IT'S QUITE ALL RIGHT. YOU WON'T GET THE TENSION HERE.
I THINK YOU -- YOU WON'T GET DETENTION HERE.
[4. BV2025-00253 207 N 18th Street Euthenia Five Stars Miles Keller]
I THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR BRINGING THIS INTO COMPLIANCE.NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS C4 BV2025-00253. 207 N 18TH STREET.
EUTHENIA FIVE STARS. >> MR. KELLER, WHAT DO YOU HAVE
FOR ME? >> I'M MILES KELLER, AN INVESTIGATOR AND INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE.
CASE NUMBER IS BV2025-00253 TRYING TO CASE INITIATED SEPTEMBER 8TH OF 2025. OWNER IS EUTHENIA FIVE STARS, PO BOX 13504, FT PIERCE FL 34979. VIOLATIONS ARE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 105.1, 2020, PERMIT REQUIRED.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPAIRS DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT.
CITY RECOMMENDATIONS. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
SO FAR THE ELECTRICAL PERMIT HAS BEEN EXPIRED.
AND I DO HAVE PICTURES OF THE PROPERTY.
>> MR. KELLER THE PICTURES YOU PROVIDED WERE FOR SEPTEMBER 8TH OF THIS YEAR... DO THE PHOTOGRAPHS TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU OBSERVE IT?
>> YES, THEY DO. >> CITY MOVES INTO EVIDENCE
COMPOSITE ONE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS AND EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE.
>> MR. KELLER, THERE WERE ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPAIRS --
WHAT WAS THE SERVICE REPAIR? >> I BELIEVE THEY REPAIRED THE
METER AND THE PANEL BOX. >> IS THAT DEPICTED IN THE
PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES IN B YOU CAN SEE THE NEW SERVICE AND RISER BEHIND THE TREE.
>> HOW ARE YOU MADE AWARE OF THAT?
>> I BELIEVE IT CAME AND AS A CASE.
SOMEBODY SEEN HIM WORKING. THEY PULLED THE PERMIT AND AFTER
SOME TIME, IT EXPIRED I BELIEVE. >> HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONTACT WITH
THE PROPERTY MANAGER? >> I HAVE NOT.
>> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY.
>> THANK YOU. IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THAT THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT
[00:40:01]
REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 WILL BE ASSESSED WITH 30[5. BV2025-00254 2702 Dunbar St Whitty, Vera & Slater, Mildred Frank Remling]
DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE PLEASE.>> THE NEXT CASES NUMBER 4 C5 CASE NUMBER BV2025-00254.
2702 DUNBAR ST. WHITTY, VERA & SLATER, MILDRED.
>> CASE NUMBERS BV2025-00254. 2702 DUNBAR ST.
THE CASE INITIATED SEPTEMBER 9TH, 2025.
THE OWNER VERA WILEY, MILDRED SLAUGHTER.
2702 DUNBAR STREET FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, 34947.
VIOLATIONS IPMC 111.1.5.3 (3) (2021) DANGEROUS STRUCTURE OR PREMISES. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO MAKE THE STRUCTURE SAFE AGAIN.
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
THE OWNER STATES THAT THE REPAIRS HAVE BEEN DONE HOWEVER NO PERMITS FOR ANY REPAIRS. SO IT LOOKS LIKE THEY DID THE WORK BUT DID NOT GET ANY PER PERMITS.
AND HERE'S SOME PICTURES. THAT WAS A CALL FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, THERE WAS A CAR -- I HAVE SOME PICTURES.
>> MR. REMLING THESE PHOTOGRAPHS ARE FROM SEPTEMBER 8TH LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS?
>> YES, I DID. >> CITY MOVES AND EVIDENCE
I WILL ACCEPT THIS AND EVIDENCE HAS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE.
>> MR. REMLING I KNOW YOU SAID THE OWNER STATED REPAIRS HAVE BEEN DONE. HAVE THEY CALLED YOU TO DO
ANOTHER INSPECTION? >> I HAVE NOT BEEN CALLED.
>> TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THIS. >> I HAVEN'T.
>> AND ADDITIONALLY IF YOU HAVE THE REPAIRS DONE THERE'S NO PERMITS AND THAT WOULD'VE BEEN REQUIRED.
>> I LEARNED HOW TO FIX IT. >> NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.
>> THANK YOU. IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS ON THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT. OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, AND COMPLY WITH ALL THE OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED.
[6. BV2025-00258 2101 Okeechobee Rd Okeechobee Ofc Warehouse Complex LLC Michael Waldrop]
YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE PLEASE.>> THE NEXT CASES NUMBER 4 C6 NUMBER BV2025-00258, 2101 OKEECHOBEE ROAD. OKEECHOBEE OFC WAREHOUSE COMPLEX
LLC. >> GOOD MORNING I'M MICHAEL WALDROP INVESTIGATOR AND INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. THE CASE IS BV2025-00258, 2101 OKEECHOBEE RD. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED ON SEPTEMBER 10TH, 2025. THE OWNER IS OKEECHOBEE OFC WAREHOUSE COMPLEX LLC AT 626 OLD DIXIE HWY SW, VERO BEACH FL 34962-4536. THE VIOLATIONS ARE FBC 105.1 (2020) PERMIT REQUIRED. THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE CONCRETE RAMP AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE PROPERTY. THE RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THE CITY REQUEST THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF
[00:45:03]
$250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. AT THIS POINT IN TIME THE PERMIT FOR THE RAMP HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR ON 327.>> MR. WALDROP THE PHOTOGRAPHS PROVIDED ARE DATED AUGUST 4TH OF LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS?
>> YES, I DID. >> DO THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT THE
VIOLATION AS YOU'VE OBSERVED IT? >> THEY DO.
>> YOU MOVE INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE ONE.
>> THANK YOU. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS AND EVIDENCE HAS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE.
>> MR. WALDROP YOU STATED THE PERMIT THE RAMP IS THE ONE LAST THING THAT NEEDS TO BE PERMITTED.
>> YES. >> THAT WAS THE -- APPLIED FOR MARCH 27TH. WHETHER OR NOT THAT'S BEEN
>> I DO NOT. I KNOW IT'S BEEN APPLIED FOR AT
THIS POINT IN TIME. >> I KNOW THE RECOMMENDATION IS 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT THAT PRESUMABLY SHOULD THIS BE DONE
IN 60 DAYS. >> I WOULD ASSUME IT SHOULD BE.
>> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY.
>> THANK YOU. IT SAYS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
[7. BV2025-00262 2201 Matanzas Ave Jennings, Terry Michael Waldrop]
WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE PLEASE.>> THE NEXT CASE IS 4C NUMBER -- SEVEN.
BV2025-00262. 2201 MATANZAS AVE.
TERRY JENNINGS IS THE OWNER. >> OKAY.
I'M MICHAEL WALDROP INVESTIGATOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE.
THIS HAD ACTUALLY COME TO ME AS A COMPLAINT.
THE CASE NUMBER IS BV2025-00262, IT IS 2201 MATANZAS AVE.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON SEPTEMBER 25TH OF 2025.
THE OWNER IS HARRY JENNINGS OF 2201 MATANZAS AVE, FT PIERCE FL 34946-5534. THE VIOLATIONS ARE FBC 105.1 (2020) PERMIT REQUIRED, IPMC 111.1.3 (2021) STRUCTURE UNFIT FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY, IPMC 304.6 (2021) EXTERIOR WALLS, IPMC 305.3 (2021) INTERIOR SURFACES. THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE ONE, OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE DEMOLITION OF PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, FRAMING AND DRYWALL REPAIRS THAT HAVE BEEN PERFORMED WITHOUT A PERMIT. TWO, OBTAIN A PERMIT TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY REPAIRS TO MAKE THE STRUCTURE FIT FOR HABITATION AGAIN. IT'S RECOMMENDED THE OCCUPANTS VACATE THE STRUCTURE UNTIL THE CONDITION IS REMEDIED.
MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO PLUMBING LEAKS, HVAC THAT IS NOT FUNCTIONING, TO OPEN WALLS AND TO OPEN WALLS, ROTTED STUDS AND DETERIORATED DRYWALL. THREE, OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR OR REPLACE DAMAGED EXTERIOR WALLS.
FOUR, PAINT OR REPAIR THE INTERIOR SURFACES OF THE STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED. REPAIR OR REPLACE MISSING DRYWALL, FLOORING, BASEBOARDS UNTRIMMED.
THE RECOMMENDATION, THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
AT THIS TIME THE PERMIT -- A PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED ON THREE OF 26 FOR DRYWALL ONLY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO INSPECTIONS OR REQUESTS FROM THE OWNER FOR REINSPECTION.
>> DO YOU HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> MY APOLOGIES.
I WILL GET WITH THE PROGRAM. >> YOU'VE PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS DATED SEPTEMBER 22ND OF LAST YEAR.
DID YOU TAKE THESE PUT PHOTOGRAPHS.
[00:50:01]
>> YES, I DID. >> DO THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU'VE OBSERVED THEM.
>> THEY DO. >> CITY MOVES INTO EVIDENCE
COMPOSITE ONE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE HAS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE.
>> MR. WALDROP, WAS THERE A FLIGHT IN THE HOME THAT BECAUSE
THE DAMAGES? >> I REMEMBER THEY SAID THEY WERE OUT OF TOWN FOR A. OF TIME AND CAME BACK TO A
FLOODED HOME. >> NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.
>> THANK YOU. IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS. THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED.
[8. BV2025-00273 309 N 15th Street Unit A Ulysse, Vaneau Frank Remling]
WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE PLEASE.>> THE NEXT CASE IS 4.C.8. CASE NUMBER BV2025-00273.
THE ADDRESS IS 309 N 15TH STREET UNIT A.
VANEAU ULYSSE IS THE OWNER. >> THE CASE NUMBER IS BV2025-00273, VANEAU ULYSSE -- 309 N 15TH STREET UNIT A.
CASE INITIATE SEPTEMBER 29TH 2025.
THE OWNERS VANEAU ULYSSE. 309 N 15TH STREET, FT PIERCE, FL 49950. VIOLATION IS FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND 22. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS RENEW EXPIRED ELECTRICAL PERMIT TRYING 25 OR OBTAIN A NEW PERMIT.
RECOMMENDATION IS THE CITY FIND SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. AND THE RENEWAL FOR THE EXPIRED PERMIT IS IN REVIEW ON FOUR, TWO, 2026.
AND IT'S -- IT'S AN EXPIRED PERMIT LOOKS LIKE THEY'RE TRYING
ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? >> NO SIR.
>> ALL RIGHT. THE COURT FINDS THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
[9. BV2025-00299 1116 N 16th Ct Unit A Anderson, Mikler Michael Waldrop]
NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS 4.C.9.
BV2025-00299. 1116 N 16TH CT UNIT A.
ANDERSON, MIKLER IS THE OWNER. >> I'M MICHAEL WALDROP.
INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE.
THIS IS CASE BV2025-00299. 1116 N 16TH CT UNIT A.
THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 15TH 2025.
THE OWNER IS MIKLER ANDERSON, PO BOX 260544, PEMBROKE PINES FL 3026-7544. THAT'S NOT RIGHT BUT -- VIOLATIONS ARE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 105-2020 PERMIT REQUIRED.
IPMC 305.3 (2021) INTERIOR SURFACES, IPMC 309.1 (2021)
[00:55:01]
INFESTATION. THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THAT HAS BEEN PERFORMED WITHOUT A PERMIT INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SEWER AND WATER SUPPLY LINE REPAIRS, TUB CONVERSION TO SHOWER, DRYWALL, WATER HEATER AND AC INSTALLATIONS.TWO, TO PAINT OR REPAIR THE INTERIOR SURFACE OF THE STRUCTURE AS REQUIRED, MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO WATER DAMAGE DRYWALL, INSULATION, WOULD STUDS AND TRIM, ET CETERA.
THREE TO TREAT THE PROPERTY FOR ALL PEST INFESTATION AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO THE STRUCTURE TO PREVENT REINFESTATION. RECOMMENDATION IS THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT; OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED; COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. AT THIS TIME NO PERMITS FOR THE CITED WORK OR REQUEST FROM THE OWNER FOR REINSPECTION'S.
SO NOTHING'S BEEN DONE. >> ANY PHOTOGRAPHS?
>> MR. WALDROP YOU PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS DATED OCTOBER 15TH LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS?
>> I DID. >> DO THESE PHOTOGRAPHS FAIRLY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU SAID THEM?
>> YES. >> HE CITY MOVES TO DEPOSIT
ONE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITY-- CITIES COMPOSITE ONE.
>> DID THIS COME IN AS A COMPLAINT FROM THE TENANT?
>> YES, THIS WAS A COMPLAINT. IT SHOULD BE IN THE FILE.
>> I KNOW THERE IS ALSO A VIOLATION OF MEETING PERMITS.
WAS THEIR WORK BEING DONE IN THE HOME WHEN YOU WERE...
>> THERE WAS WORKERS PRESENT DOING THE SHOWER ENCLOSURE AT THE TIME. YOU CAN SEE THE BUCKETS.
I THINK IT'S PICTURED IN THIS ONE.
THERE IS A GENTLEMAN ROUTING SHOWERS AT THE TIME.
>> DOES NOT WORK NEED PERMITS AS WELL?
>> YES, TO COMPLETELY REMOVE THAT SHOWER YOU WOULD NEED A PERMIT FOR THE PLUMBING. AND IF YOU LOOK OUTSIDE YOU WILL SEE PICTURES OF THE NEW DRAINAGE AND NEW WATER PIPES THAT HAVE-- THAT GO THROUGH THE BUILDING FROM THE EXTERIOR TO THE INTERIOR ON THE OUTSIDE OF THAT SHOWER WALL.
>> NO FURTHER QUESTIONS. >> AS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS-- IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS, AND THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 16 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, AND APPROVAL FOR ALL INSPECTIONS, AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED.
COMPLY WITH OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS, AND ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER, WILL-- A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED, WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL.
NEXT DAYS, PLEASE? -- NEXT CASE, PLEASE? FORT PIERCE. YOU ARE IN AUDIO ATTENDANCE OF THE HEARING. CAN I SPEAK WITH ATTORNEY WIND?
>> ANNOUNCER: HAVE YOU BEEN INJURED IN A SLIP AND FALL ACCIDENT? WHETHER IT HAPPENS AT THE
GROCERY STORE OR-- >> THIS IS RYAN WINN.
>> I'M GOING TO CALL THE CASE. LET ME CALL THE CASE FIRST.
[1. 24-719 1102 S US Hwy 1 Jeff Biegun Holdings LLC Elizabeth Beck]
>> YOU GOT IT. >> CASE NUMBER 24, 719, FOR
[01:00:03]
ADDRESS 1102, SOUTH HIGHWAY 1. CAN YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND? PLEASE AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE>> THIS IS CASE 24 DASH 719, SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 21.
INITIATED ON MARCH 1ST 2024. THE OWNER, AT 15835 CORPORATE ROAD NORTH, FLORIDA, 34478. SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, THIS STARTED AS A PERMIT REQUIRED CASE, AC INSTALLED WITHOUT A PERMIT.
IN ORDER TO-- THE DETERMINING VIOLATION WAS ENTERED AUGUST 16TH 2024. AND AN AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WAS ENTERED IN NOVEMBER 262024.
EVENTUALLY THE OWNER WAS ABLE TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT PERMITS AND GET THE FINAL INSPECTIONS, AND AN AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE WAS ENTERED JANUARY 22ND, 2026. HOWEVER, FINDS DID ACCRUE TO THE AMOUNT OF $7950, INCLUDING $50 OF RECORDING FEES.
THE OWNER INITIALLY OFFERED-- MADE AN OFFER OF-- LET ME SEE IF I CAN BRING THIS UP. ASKING TO RESENT-- RESCIND THE FEE ENTIRELY. SUBSEQUENTLY, ATTORNEY WYNNE HAS MADE AN OFFER OF 10% OF THIS, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN $795, HOWEVER THE CITY HAS CALCULATED THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND
THE TOTAL, $1515.40. >> THANK YOU.
MR. WYNNE, THIS IS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE.
HOW ARE YOU? >> I'M DOING WELL.
>> TELL ME WHAT'S GOING ON? >> THIS WAS AN INSTANCE WHERE MY CLIENT PURCHASE THIS PROPERTY UNBEKNOWNST TO HIM, THE PRIOR OWNER HAD INSTALLED SOME ROOF AC UNITS.
HE GOT NOTICE OF THE VIOLATION AND HE WENT THROUGH THE PROCESS OF OBTAINING THE PERMITS. UNFORTUNATELY, BECAUSE OF THE TYPE OF AC UNITS, OR WHERE THEY WERE, AND THIS IS ABOVE MY PAY GRADE, BUT IT WAS SUCH A UNIQUE SITUATION THAT THEY NEEDED TO PUT SMOKE DETECTORS INSIDE THE AC, WHICH TOOK MORE TIME.
IT WAS NOT SOMETHING THAT COULD JUST BE FIXED ON AS BILTZ.
MY CLIENTS SPENT ABOUT $8000 ON GETTING THESE THINGS UP TO SNUFFED, SO TO SPEAK,, FOR THE BILLING DEPARTMENT, GETTING IN COMPLIANCE. HE WAS DOING EVERYTHING HE COULD, HE WORKED AS QUICKLY AS HE COULD UNDER THE SITUATION.
THE INTENT OF CODE ENFORCEMENTS IS NOT TO BE PUNITIVE IN NATURE.
THE PROPERTY TAXES ON THIS PROPERTY ALONE ARE ABOUT 42,000.
HE IS PAYING MORTGAGE ON IT, ANNUAL INSURANCE IS 15,000.
HE HAS ONE TENANT IN THEIR PAYING 1000 A MONTH, AND IT'S A BOXING CLUB FOR UNDERPRIVILEGED CHILDREN.
SO IT IS A FINANCIAL BURDEN TO HAVE TO PAY THESE FINDS.
AND I UNDERSTAND THE CITY'S POSITION, THAT THEY ARE AGREEABLE TO ACCEPTING THE ADMINISTRATIVE CALCULATED COST, HOWEVER WE WOULD ASK FOR 10%. BUT UNDERSTANDING THE CITY'S
POSITION AS WELL. >> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE HE WANTED TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION, MR. WYNNE?
>> THAT'S IT FOR THIS MORNING. >> ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? ANY RESPONSE?
>> NO. >> I CERTAINLY APPRECIATE YOUR CLIENTS EFFORTS HERE. IT SOUNDS LIKE A LOT OF WORK HAS GONE INTO THIS MATTER. ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY DID NOT KNOW THAT THEY WERE WALKING INTO THIS WHEN THEY PURCHASE THE PROPERT. HOWEVER, BASED OFF WHAT I AM HEARING HERE, I DON'T FIND IT WOULD BE IN THE CITY'S BEST INTEREST TO FALL BELOW THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.
SO IN RECOGNITION OF YOUR CLIENTS EFFORTS AND THE SITUATION, I DO AGREE THERE SHOULD BE A REDUCTION, BUT I DON'T SEE THAT THERE IS ENOUGH FOR ME TO PUT IT BELOW THE 1515-- 1515-POINT FRO-- 1515.40 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.
[01:05:05]
BUT CAN I ASK, HOW LONG WOULD YOUR CLIENT NEED TO MAKE THATPAYMENT? >> HE WOULD MAKE THE PAYMENT
WITHIN 30 DAYS. >> WITHIN 30 DAYS.
OKAY. I WILL INTERIM ORDER, DIRECTING HIM TO PAY IT WITHIN 45. JUST TO GIVE HIM A LITTLE
>> OF COURSE. AND JUST UNDERSTAND THAT IF IT'S NOT PAID WITHIN THAT 45 DAYS IT WILL REVERT BACK TO THAT 7950 AMOUNT. AND OF COURSE HE DOES HAVE 30
DAYS TO APPEAL IF HE SO CHOOSES. >> UNDERSTOOD.
HIS B ANYTHING FURTHER FOR ME? >> I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME THIS MORNING, AND YOUR ASSISTANCE THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS B EXCELLENT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
WE WILL ISSUE THAT ORDER SHORTLY.
>> I WILL BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR IT.
THANK YOU, MISS BACK. >> THANK YOU.
>> GOODBYE. >> IS THAT THE LAST CASE FOR
TODAY? >> THAT IS THE LAST CASE.
>> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, THIS IS SOMEONE WHO WAS TRAVELING TO THE HEARING. BUT WE HAVE ALREADY CALLED THE CASE AND YOU ALREADY MADE A-- YOUR JUDGEMENT.
>> UNDERSTOOD. SO UNFORTUNATELY YOU MISSED US.
1116, NORTH 16TH. >> WHICH PROPERTY?
>> 1116, NORTH COURT, ITEM 4C MAC NINE.
>> DOES THE CITY HAVE A POSITION HERE?
>> WE ENTERED AN ORDER ALLOWING 60 DAYS TO GET A PERMIT.
PHOTOS WITH YOU SO YOU CAN SEE. HOWEVER, WE NEED PERMITS TO BE OBTAINED, AND THE ORDER WILL STATE 60 DAYS.
IS THAT AGREEABLE TO YOU? >> THEN TO BE CLEAR, IF YOU COME UP ON THAT 60 DAYS, AND YOU NEED MORE TIME, I DON'T MIND YOU REACHING OUT TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO ASK FOR MORE TIME.
BUT WE NEED A DEADLINE IN PLACE. WE NEED TO SEE MOVEMENT.
BASED OFF WHAT YOU ARE TELLING ME, I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT YOU
ARE PLANNING ON WORKING SWIFTLY. >> THE TENANT WAS VERY UPSET WITH ME, IT WAS A VERY BAD EVICTION.
AND PREVIOUSLY THE JUDGE WAS ON MY SIDE ABOUT EVERYTHING, AND BECAUSE OF THAT I GAVE HER A WHOLE TWO MONTHS FREE TO JUST MOVE OUT. BUT SHE DID NOT UPKEEP THE PLACE. BUT THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE WATER COMING OUT OF THE GROUND AND THE WASTE THAT I DID TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION TO DO ON MY OWN.
BUT I'M WILLING TO DO THE PERMIT IF I HAVE TO DO SO.
IT'S NOT A PROBLEM. >> THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR GETTING THIS TOGETHER. I THANK YOU FOR BRAVING THE WEATHER, AND I AM GLAD YOU MADE IT SAFE.
WE WILL MAKE SURE YOU GET A COPY OF THE ORDER AFTER IT IS ISSUED.
SAFE TRAVELS. >> FOR CASES REQUIRING NOTICE FOR STATE STATUE 1612, A NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE
[01:10:03]
VIOLATOR. IF THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED SIGNED IT IS PLACED IN THE FILE. AT THE GREEN CARD IS RETURNED UNSIGNED OR UNCLAIMED, AN AFFIDAVIT AMOUNTING WITH THE NOTICE OF HEARING ENCLOSED IS MAILED TO THE VIOLATOR.TEN DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING, A NOTICE OF HEARING IS SENT IN REGULAR U.S. MAIL WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ATTACHED.
COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE PLACED IN THE FILE.
TEN DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD IN THE LOBBY OF CITY HALL.
A NOTICE OF HEARING IS ALSO POSTED AT THE PROPERTY AND QUESTIONED WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.
IF THE CERTIFICATION CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE BUILDING REQUIREMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING, POSTING IS COMPLETED THE SAME WAY AS IF THE CARD WAS RETURNED UNCLAIMED.
THAT IS IT. >> WE ARE ADJOURNED.
THANK YOU, EVERYONE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.