[1. CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:10] >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING OF APRIL 15TH, 2026 IS CALLED TO ORDER. CAN WE PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. TO THE REPUBLIC ONE NATION UNDER [a. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES] GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. PLEASE REMAIN STANDING. >> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU STARE --'S AWARE THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH? YOU MAY HAVE A SEAT. >> ALL RIGHT. BEFORE WE GET STARTED DOES ANYONE HERE HAVE THE NEED OF AN INTERPRETER OR ASSISTANCE OF A HEARING DEVICE? IF SO LET US KNOW AND ONE WILL BE PROVIDED FOR YOU. THIS MORNING YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU ATTORNEY SOLOMON REPRESENTING THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. FROM THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT. I AM JAMIE BAROQUE, I WILL BE SERVING AS YOUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THIS MORNING. FOR YOUR BACKGROUND PLEASE KNOW THESE PROCEEDINGS ARE GOING TO BE LIVE STREAMED AND RECORDED. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO'VE RECEIVED A CITATION OR VIOLATION, WE'RE GOING TO REFER TO YOU AS A RESPONDENT THIS MORNING. IT'S IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND HOW THESE PROCEEDINGS ARE GOING TO UNFOLD. FIRST THE CITY IS GOING TO PRESENT ITS CASE THROUGH EVIDENCE WHICH MAY INCLUDE TESTIMONY OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, INVESTIGATORS, POLICE OFFICERS OR OTHER WITNESSES. THE EVIDENCE MAY INCLUDE PHYSICAL ITEMS SUCH AS PHOTOGRAPHS THEN WE'RE GOING TO REFER TO THOSE AS EXHIBITS THIS MORNING. THE STANDARD OF PROOF IS WHETHER THE VIOLATION HAS BEEN PROVEN BASED UPON COMPETENCE, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. YOU AS A RESPONDENT WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE LEGAL OBJECTIONS AND CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES IF YOU SO CHOOSE. ONCE THE CITY HAS FINISHED PRESENTING ITS CASE, YOU AS A RESPONDENT WILL THEN BE ALLOWED TO MAKE A STATEMENT, PRESENT WITNESS TESTIMONY AND PRESENT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE SUCH AS DOCUMENTS AND PHOTOGRAPHS. THEN I AS YOUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WILL RENDER A FINAL RULING. I ASK THAT EVERYONE THIS MORNING CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN A CALM AND RESPECTFUL MATTER AT -- MANOR AT ALL IN ALL COMMENTS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO ME AS YOUR SPECIAL [1. Case Number: PK-2025-390 Investigating Officer: Heather Debevec Violation Location: 1901 Rio Vista Dr] MAGISTRATE. MS. LUNA, WAIT -- MAY WE FIRST -- HAVE THE FIRST CASE. >> THE FIRST CASES 4A1 PK 202-5390. 1901 RIO VISTA DRIVE. >> CAN YOU SAY THE AVERAGE -- EDGES AGAIN. >> 1901 RIO VISTA DRIVE. >> GOOD MORNING, SIR. WHAT IS YOUR NAME? >> RICK KULCZYNSKI. >> WHAT'S YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROPERTY? >> I OWN IT. >> WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. OFFICER, WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME? >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER PK 2025-390. ISSUED AT 1901 RIO VISTA DRIVE. A PARKING CITATION ON JANUARY 13TH. THE CITATION 15434 REFERENCE TO CODE 34-31 SUBSECTION JAY SUBSECTION TWO COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AND RESIDENTIAL ZONE. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. THE VIOLATOR BE ASSESSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $78. FAILURE TO PAY SUCH A FINE WITHIN 15 DAYS WILL RESULT OF THE CITATION BEING FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM. I DO HAVE PHOTOS TO SUBMIT. WITH A WARNING I BELIEVE LEFT HONORS VEHICLE. I WENT BACK TO CHECK ON THE WARNING WITH REFERENCE TO COMMERCIAL VEHICLE. I HAD SPOKE WITH THE GENTLEMAN TO MY LEFT AND HE SAID HE WOULD TAKE CARE OF IT. I CAME BACK A FEW DAYS LATER AND IT HAD NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. SO I ISSUED A CITATION. SINCE ISSUING A CITATION, THE ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED. >> HAVE YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THESE PICTURES? >> SAY AGAIN. >> HAVE YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THESE PICTURES? >> NOT THEIRS. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO? >> YEAH. [00:05:24] >> THE PHOTOGRAPHS NEEDED [INDISCERNIBLE] AS WELL AS COPIES OF THE CITATIONS AND WARNINGS LEFT ON THE VEHICLE. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES, MA'AM, [INDISCERNIBLE] >> YES, MA'AM. [INDISCERNIBLE] >> THANK YOU. I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY. >> THANK YOU. SIR, WHAT DO HAVE A ME THIS MONEY? >> ACCORDING TO YOUR DEFINITION OF A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE IT'S A VEHICLE 12,500 POUNDS OR GREATER. THE STATE OF FLORIDA SAID THIS VEHICLES NOT THAT WEIGHT AND THE WEIGHT OF IT THEY HAVE IT LISTED AS 7999 POUNDS. >> AND WHAT IS YOUR SUPPORT FOR THAT? >> SAY AGAIN. >> WHAT IS YOUR SUPPORT FOR THAT. >> HERE'S A COPY OF THE REGISTRATION. >> IS THIS COPY SOMETHING YOU WANT ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE. >> YEAH. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIT. -- EXHIBIT A. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? >> I DON'T KNOW IF THERE -- WHETHER THE VEHICLES PART OF THE VIOLATION BUT DRIVING THROUGH OUR SOUTH BEACH AREA ON A SU SUNDAY, THERE'S APPROXIMATELY 15 VEHICLES THAT HAVE LETTERING OR HAVE THE VEHICLES WRAPPED AND LOOKS LIKE THIS IS SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT. AND I'M BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST FOR THAT SINCE NO OTHER VEHICLES HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED OR ANYTHING. >> QUESTION FOR YOU. HOW DO YOU KNOW THOSE OTHER ONES HAVEN'T BEEN NOTIFIED? >> WHEN I GOT THE FIRST CITATION, I NEVER RECEIVED A SECOND ONE WHERE IT WAS PUT ON THE VEHICLE IT PROBABLY BLEW OFF WHEN I WENT DOWN THE STREET. I DROVE AROUND ON SUNDAY MORNING ON MY WAY TO BREAKFAST OVER AT THE AMERICAN LEGION. AND I DID PICK -- DID TAKE PICTURES OF THEM. >> DID YOU SPEAK TO EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE MEN YOU KNOW PERSONALLY THEY WERE NOT VIOLATED? >> NO BUT I ALSO DROVE AROUND ON LAST SUNDAY ON MY WAY TO BREAKFAST. MOST OF THE VEHICLES ARE STILL SITTING THERE IN THE FRONT DRIVEWAY. THERE'S A BIG DIFFERENCE OF TIME AND NOTHING ELSE HAS BEEN DONE. >> BASICALLY YOU CANNOT CONFIRM TO ME THAT THEY'VE RECEIVED CITATIONS OR NOT. >> NO BUT I SUSPECT THEY HAVEN'T. >> YOU SUSPECTS. >> BECAUSE IF THEY RECEIVED A CITATION FOR THE LETTERING, THEN THE VEHICLES WOULD EITHER NOT BE THERE OR THEY WOULD BE COVERED UP. THE LETTERING WOULD BE COVERED UP. >> YOU WOULD AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE UNFAIR IF THEY DIDN'T GET CHARGED IN ANY KIND OF WAY. >> THAT WOULD BE I'M DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BY SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT. >> LET ME ASK YOU THIS. WHY DIDN'T YOU REPORT THEM THEN? >> IT'S NOT MY JOB. YOU HAVE A CODE ENFORCEMENT PERSON DRIVING AROUND WHO'S SUPPOSED TO BE DOING THEIR JOB. I KNOW WHO TURNED ME AND WAS MY NEIGHBOR. AND THE REASON HE PROBABLY TURNED ME IN WAS BECAUSE HE SPENT $10,500 TO HAVE EQUIPMENT [00:10:04] REPLACED IN HIS HOUSE WHEN IT ONLY NEEDED A 300-DOLLAR FIX. AND HE NEVER CAME OVER AND ASKED ME MY OPINION OR ANYTHING. I'M BASICALLY RETIRED ON THE THING. I'M A MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, I STILL HAVE INACTIVE LICENSE BECAUSE WE STILL DO WORK ALL OVER SOUTH FLORIDA FOR SELECT CUSTOMERS. AND WHEN I TALKED TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT LADY, THE FIRST TIME SHE CAME WHATEVER IT WAS SHE SAID JUST MAKE SURE TO COVER IT UP BECAUSE I WAS GOING TO PUT MAGNETICS STUFF ON THE PHONE NUMBER AND OTHER STUFF AND SHE SAID NO. I LOOKED AT ONE END HOW MY GOING TO TAKE THESE LETTERING OFF SINCE THE LETTERING HAS BEEN ON SINCE 2000 WHEN THE TRUCK WAS NEW. IT'S NOT GOING TO COME OFF REAL EASY. AND ALL. THE SOLUTION CAME TO BE COVERED UP WITH A TARP WHICH THEY DID. AND EVERYBODY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WAS SURPRISED THAT I DID THAT AND I'VE GOT MORE PEOPLE TALK TO ME ABOUT MY TRUCK IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEY ARE ALL LAUGHING AT WHAT'S HAPPENING. BECAUSE THEY SEE THE VEHICLE -- THE VEHICLES AROUND IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAVE LETTERING. AND NOTHING'S BEEN DONE FOR THEM. >> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? >> NO. >> ANY RESPONSE FROM THE CITY? >> I DID NOT RECEIVE THIS PARTICULAR CITATION I NEVER RECEIVED WHERE SHE PUT IT ON THE TRUCK IF IT WAS PUT ON THE TRUCK AND A PROPER WAY, I WOULD HAVE SAID IF YOU'RE GOING TO COVER IT ALL THE WINDSHIELD WIPER YOU PUT IT ALL THE DRIVERS SIDE SO WHEN YOU GOT IN THAT SIDE OF THE VEHICLE YOU'LL SEE IT. UNLESS YOU GOT IN ON THE PASSENGER'S SIDE ARE YOU GOING TO INSPECT YOUR PET -- WINDSHIELD EVERY MORNING, YOU WOULD NOT SEE THAT. >> IS IT YOUR POSITION THAT IT WAS NOT PUT ALL THE DRIVERS SIDE. >> IT WAS PUT ON THE PASSENGER SIDE BIGGER PICTURE SHOWS. >> SO IT WAS THERE. YOU AGREE THAT IT WAS THERE. >> NOW THAT I SEE IT ON THE PICTURE, BUT NOT HOW LONG IT WAS PUT IN AND STAYED THERE. IT PROBABLY WAS THERE, I DIDN'T SEE IT WHEN I GOT AN AD LEFT AND IT BLEW RIGHT OFF. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOU. WHEN YOU DRIVE I DON'T LOOK OUT THE PASSENGER WINDOW -- WINDSHIELD SIDE WHEN I'M DRIVING. >> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? ANY RESPONSE FROM THE CITY? >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE >> SERVER, WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THIS WEIGHT REQUIREMENT? I SEE YOU HAVE THE SUPPORT YEAR. >> YOUR SITE WHERE THEY CITED IN THE CODE TALKS ABOUT COMMERCIAL VEHICLES. >> ATTORNEY CAN YOU COMMENT TO THAT? >> IF YOU CITED HIM UNDER SUBSECTION TWO AND WHAT IS YOUR UNDERSTANDING 34-31. >> COMMERCIAL VEHICLES ARE 10,000 POUNDS AND IT IS MORE THAN 3-INCH LETTERING. >> TO BE CLEAR [INDISCERNIBLE] EARLIER ON IN THAT SECTION. >> CORRECT. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN JAY ONE AND J2 IS IS THE LOCATION OF THE VEHICLE. >> A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE UNDER THIS WOULD BE 34-18 [INDISCERNIBLE] ANY VEHICLE USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY COMMERCIAL A PRIZE... OF THE EXTERIOR OF THE VEHICLE. IS THAT WHAT YOU WERE REFERENCING, THEIR DEFINITION? >> CORRECT. >> ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? SO SIR, HELP ME UNDERSTAND HERE. WE HAD THIS FINE AND THERE'S A [00:15:02] LEAVE. LET ME ASK THE CITY THIS. WHEN WAS THIS TO BE PAID? WHY IS IT LATE BASICALLY? WHEN WAS THE DUE DATE. >> THE FIRST TIME I GOT NOTICE OF IT WAS WHEN I GOT A REGISTERED LETTER IN THE MAIL. SHOWING TO SHOW UP FOR A NOTICE TO APPEAR. >> OFFICER DEBEVEC, WHEN WAS THIS MEANT TO BE PAID? >> THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN FEBRUARY 13TH OR 14TH. >> SO IT WAS POSTED ON THE VEHICLE JANUARY 13TH. >> CORRECT. >> OKAY. AND A MONTH LATER IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAID. MR. SO CITO YOU BRING SO I CAN SEE THE FULL RANGE OF THAT PAGE? THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION HERE? >> THE TRUCK NOW THE LETTERS ARE COVERED UP. I DIDN'T BRING A PICTURE OF THAT BUT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO SEE ANY OF THE WRITING ON THE TRUCK. >> I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY DISPUTE TO THAT. ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? ALL RIGHT. SIR, THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN THIS MORNING AND PLEADING YOUR CASE. AS IT PERTAINS TO THE OTHER VEHICLES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHILE I'M SORRY TO HEAR THAT YOU SEE THEM THERE AND THEY ARE NOT COVERING THEIR VEHICLES, THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE RIGHT HERE. I INVITE YOU -- PLEASE DON'T INTERRUPT ME. I INVITE YOU IF YOU DO SEE A VIOLATION, CALL THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT. REPORT THEM. WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER BUT ALL I CAN DO RIGHT NOW IS DEAL WITH WHAT'S IN FRONT OF ME. AS IT PERTAINS TO THE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, I DON'T SEE THAT THE CITY DID ANYTHING WRONG HERE. SIMPLY BECAUSE THERE'S A PORTION OF THE DEFINITION OF WHAT A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE IS WHICH WOULD ENCOMPASS YOUR VEHICLE IN PARTICULAR. IN RECOGNITION OF THE FACT THAT YOU DID TAKE THE STEPS TO COVER THE VEHICLE, WHICH I DO APPRECIATE, I'M PREPARED TO WAIVE THE LATE FEE FOR YOU HERE. SO THAT WOULD BRING YOUR TOTAL DUE DOWN FROM $78 TO $60. DO YOU FIND 15 DAYS TO BE A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME TO MAKE THAT PAYMENT? >> I THINK THIS IS LIKE A KANGAROO COURT MYSELF ON THE THING. BECAUSE HERE AGAIN I BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST FOR SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT. IT'S NOT MY JOB TO GO AROUND UNTIL THE CODE ENFORCEMENT WHERE TO GO LOOK AND DO THEIR JOB. >> SIR, IF YOU CAN COME BACK TO ME WITH PROOF THAT THESE PEOPLE HAVEN'T BEEN CITED PERHAPS WE COULD HAVE A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION. AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW I HAVE NO SUCH PROOF. YOU'RE RIGHT, IT'S NOT YOUR JOB TO REPORT THEM BUT IF YOU'RE NOT HAPPY WITH IT THAT SOMETHING YOU COULD DO. AGAIN I AM WILLING TO WAIVE THAT LATE FEE. MY QUESTION FOR YOU IS HOW LONG DO YOU NEED TO PAY THAT? >> BEFORE WE GO INTO THAT, THERE'S YOUR PERSON THAT WOULD HAVE DECIDED. >> RESPECTFULLY I'VE HEARD ENOUGH ON THIS CASE. MY DECISION IS MADE. >> BEFORE WE GO ON I WANT TO ASK HER. >> WE ARE GOING ON. >> CROSS-EXAMINE ON HOW MANY OTHER VEHICLES HAS SHE CITED THAT HAVE LETTERING ON. >> I'M GOING TO ASK YOU RESPECTFULLY ONE MORE TIME HOW MUCH TIME YOU NEED -- >> FOREVER. >> THAT'S NOT WITHIN MY POWER. >> BECAUSE OF DISCRIMINATION ON THIS. THE PERSON THAT WOULD BE CITING IS RIGHT THERE. ASKING IF ANYONE'S BEEN CITED. YOU'VE GOT YOUR EXPERT RIGHT THERE. >> UNDERSTOOD. HERE'S WHAT I'M GOING TO DO. I'M ENTERING AN ORDER THAT A FINE BE ASSESSED IN THE AMOUNT OF $60 TO BE PAID IN 15 DAYS. YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IT IF YOU SO CHOOSE. YOU CAN GO TO A HIGHER COURT BUT THAT'S MY DECISION. THANK YOU. >> WHAT A KANGAROO COURT THIS IS. NOTHING BUT A MONEY GRAB. >> NEXT CASE PLEASE. [4. Case Number: LTCL-2026-37 Investigating Officer: Charmaine Kirkland Violation Location: TBD (2324-341-0002-030-2)] >> THE NEXT CASES CASE NUMBER LTL-2026-37. THE ADDRESSES TO BE DETERMINED BUT IT'S AT PARCEL NUMBER... [00:20:03] >> GOOD MORNING SIR. WHAT IS YOUR NAME. >> GOOD MORNING. CAN YOU SPELL YOUR FIRST NAME PLEASE? AND YOUR LAST NAME... >> THANK YOU. WHAT'S YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY? >> I'M A REPRESENTATION OF THE OWNERSHIP. I WORKED THERE AND MANAGE IT AS WELL BUT REPRESENTING OWNERSHIP. >> EXCELLENT. OFFICER KIRKLAND, WHAT THE UPPER ME? >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER LTC L2026-37. I'M SO SORRY. CHARMAINE KIRKLAND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. THIS IS CASE NUMBER LTC ELLA AND 2026-37 VIOLATION LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED PARCEL NUMBER (2324-341-0002-030-2) THIS IS A LOT CLEARING. ISSUE DATE WAS MARCH 5TH, 2026. POSTED AT PROPERTY. NTA ISSUED DATE MARCH 13TH, 2026. NTA SERVICE POSTED AT PROPERTY POSTING DATE WAS MARCH 13TH, 2026. THE LAST INSPECTION DATE WAS APRIL 11TH 2026. THE OWNER IS PREMIER HOSPITALITY INC. VIOLATIONS ARE 24-19 SUBSECTION 11 A AND B. NUISANCES LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 3-ACRE PROPERTIES PICK THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND SUCH NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND THAT THE NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED THROUGH THE CITIES NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 14 DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION. REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDER WELL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES PICK THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION, THE COST OF WHICH IS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. AND I HAVE PHOTOS OF THE VIOLATION AS I WITNESSED IT ON COPY OF THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION. >> HAVE YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THESE PICTURES? >> PROVIDED A COPY OF NOTICE OF VIOLATION... [INDISCERNIBLE] DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES CITED. YES, THEY DO. >> THANK YOU. I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> I'VE SPOKEN WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER OVER THE PHONE AND THROUGH EMAIL AND I'VE SPOKEN WITH MR MR. -- OUT AT THE LOCATION. >> WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? >> WHEN WE FIRST RECEIVED THIS WE STARTED CLEARING THE LAW AND THEN WHEN WE WERE DONE WE HAD SOMEONE FROM OWNERSHIP CALL MS. KIRKLAND BACK OUT TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT. SHE RESPONDED YOU GUYS HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING YET. THAT'S WHEN I GOT INVOLVED BOOTS ON THE GROUND STYLE LIKE LET ME SEE. I'M STANDING AT THE LOT WE THOUGHT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO CLEAR AND SHE'S STANDING A BLOCK DOWN THE ROAD. COME TO REALIZE WE CLEARED THE WRONG LOT. SO THEN I WALKED OVER WITH HER, SHE WAS NICE ENOUGH TO SHOW ME IN THE RAIN. WE APOLOGIZE AGAIN FOR THAT. SHE SHOWED ME WHAT THE LOT WAS THAT NEEDED TO ACTUALLY BE CLEARED AND SO WE BEGAN CLEARING THAT. UNFORTUNATELY I DID NOT BRING IT ON A USB DRIVE BUT I DO HAVE AN UPDATED VIDEO STARTING EXACTLY WHERE THESE PICTURES START AND TO SHOW WHAT PROGRESS WE'VE MADE AND BASICALLY WE'RE JUST -- I'M HERE I GUESS TO APOLOGIZE FOR CLEARING THE WRONG LOT AND WAS HOPING TO MAYBE GET A LITTLE BIT OF EXTRA TIME TO FINISH UP. >> HOW MUCH TIME ARE YOU ASKING FOR? >> WE SHOULD PROBABLY HAVE THIS DONE IN MAY BE THE NEXT TEN DAYS, 15 DAYS WEATHER [00:25:05] PERMITTING. >> I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION HERE FOR 14 DAYS. HOW ABOUT I GIVE YOU 30 DAYS JUST TO BE SAFE. >> APPRECIATE THAT. >> EXCELLENT. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? >> NO. WHEN WERE DONE COMPLETELY CLEARING THE LOT WE JUST CALL BACK OUT OR DO WE COME BACK HERE? THANK YOU. >> ANYTHING FURTHER ON THIS? >> NO SIR. >> EXCELLENT. MR. SOCIO-DID YOU -- THANK YOU. IT'S THIS COURTS FINDING THAT A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES ON SUCH NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED TO THE CITIES NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDER WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION. THE COST OF WHICH IS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. YOU DO HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE. I THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN AND I THANK YOU FOR TAKING STEPS TO GET THIS DONE QUICKLY. [1. Case Number: LTCL-2024-112 Investigating Officer: Isaac Saucedo Violation Location: Rosarita Ave] NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASES LTC OHIO AND 2024-112 ROSA RITA AVENUE. >> AND MORNING. >> WHAT IS YOUR NAME? >> MY NAME IS TABATHA JOHNSON. >> YOU'RE ONE OF THE OWNERS, CORRECT? >> YES. >> THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN. >> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER LTC OHIO 2024-112. THE VIOLATION IS ROSA RITA AVENUE IN THE CASE TYPE'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON A MASSEY FINE. IT WAS ESTABLISHED AUGUST 13TH 2024 AND THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAIL AND PROPERTY WAS POSTED. NOTICE TO APPEAR ISSUE DATE WAS AUGUST 23RD OF 2024. SERVICE METHOD FOR THAT WAS CERTIFIED IN REGULAR MAIL AND PROPERTY WAS ALSO POSTED. THE OWNER IS VALERIE E MOORE, TABATHA JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER CAMPBELL. THE VIOLATION IS 24-19 SUBSECTION 11 SUBSECTION A SUBSECTION B SUBSECTION ONE TO TWO NUISANCES LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 3-ACRE PROPERTIES. ON THE FOURTH 2026 SPECIAL MAGISTRATE PESHKE REDUCE THE LOT CLEARING FINE FROM $36,400 TO 30 -- $3640 TO BE PAID WITHIN 90 DAYS. IF PAYMENT IS NOT RECEIVE THE AMOUNT WILL REVERT BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL AMOUNT AND COULD RESULT IN A LIEN BEING FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. SEPTEMBER 1222 ANY FOR PROPERTY REMAINS OUT OF COMPLIANCE FIND STARTED. SEPTEMBER 7TH 2025 PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE FIND STOPPED. DECEMBER 30TH 2025 FINE REDUCTION WAS RECEIVED ON THE BALANCE WAS $36,400. THE GRAVITY OR SERIOUSNESS OF THE VIOLATION WAS MINOR. ANY AND ALL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE VIOLATOR TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS, ALL VIOLATIONS LISTED ABOVE WERE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE BY THE OWNER AND ANY PREVIOUS VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY THE VIOLATOR, THAT ANSWER IS YES. PRIOR CASES INCLUDE NUISANCE ABATEMENT LEADS 19-2364 AND 21-30 TO 37 BOTH OF WHICH HAVE BEEN RELEASED. LOT CLEARING LTC L2024-183 WHICH IS -- NOW IN COMPLIANCE AND 810 NORTH 13TH STREET ALSO KNOWN AS AVENUE H AND CODE ENFORCEMENT LIEN 22-1552 AT 4:30 EIGHT NORTH 15TH STREET. THEY ARE JUST HERE, THE 90 DAY ISP ON MAY 4TH SO THEY ARE JUST REQUESTING MORE TIME TO HAVE THAT FINE OF $3640 TO BE PAID. >> MS. JOHNSON, TELL ME WHAT'S GOING ON HERE. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HAVING ME TODAY AND FOR SEEING ME BACK IN FEBRUARY. I'M 1 OF 3 OWNERS OF THIS PROPERTY. I'VE BEEN IN CONTACT -- I'VE BASICALLY BEEN THE PERSON OF THE THREE OF US IN CONTACT WITH THE [00:30:04] CITY TO TRY TO GET ANY VIOLATIONS TAKEN CARE OF HIM APPEARING IN FRONT OF THE MAGISTRATE AS WELL. WE HAVE AN OWNER FOR THE ROSARITO PROPERTY BUT UNFORTUNATELY WE CANNOT SELL IT DUE TO THE OTHER VIOLATIONS ON THE PROPERTY THAT CHRISTOPHER, VALERIE AND MYSELF OWN ON 15TH STREET. I WAS COMING IN BECAUSE WE CANNOT SELL THE PROPERTY ON ROSA RITA DUE TO THOSE FINES ON 15TH STREET TO SEE IF WE COULD ASK FOR AN EXTENSION TO PAY THE FINE REDUCTION OF 3600 I THINK IT'S $3640 FOR ROSARITO. I WAS ALSO COMING INTO BASICALLY PLEAD OUR CASE TO SEE IF IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE SINCE WE HAVE A BUYER FOR THE ROSA RITA -- ROSARITA PROPERTY TO SEE IF IT WOULD BE AT ALL POSSIBLE FOR US TO GO AHEAD TO SELL THAT PROPERTY SO THAT WE CAN PAY THESE FINES IN A TIMELY MANNER. THE REASON WHY BACK IN FEBRUARY I ACTUALLY ASKED THE MAGISTRATE, I INFORMED THEM WE WOULDN'T EVEN NEED THE 90 DAYS THEY WERE OFFERING BECAUSE WE HAD A CASH OFFER ON THAT PROPERTY. SO WE WERE VERY EXCITED ABOUT THE FINE REDUCTION AND HAVING A BUYER. FOR IT. BUT UPON TRYING TO FINALIZE THE SALE -- SALE OF THE PROPERTY, THE OTHER FINES ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON 15TH STREET CAME INTO PLAY TO BASICALLY HALT THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY AT ROSARITA. SO I'M BASICALLY ASKING NOT ONLY FOR AN EXTENSION BUT TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY POSSIBILITY OF US HAVING THAT PROPERTY RELEASED TO GO AHEAD AND SELL TO TAKE CARE OF THIS FINE AND I'M IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING AN APPLICATION, APPLICATIONS FOR FINE REDUCTIONS FOR THE 15TH STREET PROPERTY SO WE CAN TRY TO BRING EVERYTHING IN COMPLIANCE, ADDRESS OF FINES THAT ARE THERE. UNFORTUNATELY BECAUSE THESE FINES ARE SO EXTENSIVE, WE WON'T BE ABLE TO AFFORD THAT. SO WE WOULD HAVE TO SELL THIS FAMILY PROPERTY THAT'S BEEN IN THE FAMILY FOR 50 PLUS YEARS TO TRY TO ALLEVIATE THE FINES THAT HAVE ACCRUED LONG BEFORE I EVEN KNEW ABOUT THEM. BUT I WANT TO COME AND TRY TO DO THE RIGHT THING. THAT'S WHY I'VE APPEARED AS OFTEN AND BEEN IN CONTACT AS OFTEN AS I HAVE. I'M DOING ALL THAT I CAN. I DON'T HAVE THE FUNDS TO PAY THIS AND OF THE THREE OWNERS ON THE ONE WHO IS TRYING TO DO THE RIGHT THING IN THE RIGHT MANNER. AND BASICALLY ASKING TODAY IF THERE'S ANY POSSIBILITY FOR ANYTHING TO BE RELEASED FOR US TO SELL THE ROSARITA PROPERTIES SO WE CAN TAKE CARE OF THE 3640-DOLLAR FIND THAT WE OWE TO THE CITY AND I'M SUBMITTING APPLICATION FOR ANOTHER HEARING FOR A FINE REDUCTION FOR 15TH STREET SO WE CAN POSSIBLY PUT THAT ON THE MARKET TO SELL TO TAKE CARE OF THOSE FINES AS WELL. I'M JUST TRYING TO GET THE BALL ROLLING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. TO SEE WHAT I CAN DO. >> QUESTION FOR MY CLARITY. YOU SAY RELEASED. WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY RELEASED? >> FOR THE AVENUE H PROPERTY THAT HE MENTIONED, THAT WAS SOLD LAST YEAR. WHEN IT WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION FROM THE TITLE COMPANY THAT WAS TRYING TO HELP US WITH THIS PROCESS SELLING ROSARITA, SHE PULLED UP THE DOCUMENTATION AND SHARED IT WITH ME OF HOW MANY FINES AND HOW LONG THE FINES HAVE BEEN ACCRUING ON THE 15TH STREET PROPERTY AND IT WASN'T LONG BEFORE THE SALE OF THE AVENUE H PROPERTY. WHAT I MEAN BY THAT IS IF THOSE FINES ON 15TH STREET DID NOT HALT THE SALE OF THE AVENUE H PROPERTY I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY'VE COME INTO PLAY FOR THE SALE OF THE ROSARITA PROPERTY. IT'S NOT THAT I'M TRYING TO SKIRT AROUND ANYTHING, IT'S JUST THAT I WANTED TO KNOW IF THOSE FINES WERE THERE BEFORE THE SALE OF THE AVENUE H PROPERTY WHY THEY DIDN'T HALT THE SALE OF IT BUT THOSE FINES HAVE COME INTO PLAY TO HALT THE SALE OF THE ROSARITA PROPERTY. THAT WAS WHAT I MEAN BY A RELEASE. I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF THAT'S THE PROPER TERMINOLOGY BUT TO SEE IF WE COULD SELL THE ROSARITA PROPERTIES SO WE CAN TAKE CARE OF THESE FINES AND I'M SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE FINE REDUCTION HEARING FOR 15TH STREET, TRYING TO GET A [00:35:02] BUYER FOR THAT PROPERTY SO THAT WHATEVER WE GET WE CAN TAKE CARE OF WHATEVER RESPONSIBILITIES WE HAVE AS FAR AS LIENS OR FINES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. AT THIS RATE THE $36,400 THAT YOU ALL SO GRACIOUSLY REDUCED ON ROSARITA WAS ACTUALLY MORE THAN WHAT THE PROPERTY WAS WORTH. SO I WAS VERY GRATEFUL FOR THAT FINE REDUCTION. THE FINES THAT ARE ON OUR 15TH STREET PROPERTY FAR EXCEED THE WORTH OF THE PROPERTIES SO I'M GOING TO TAKE THAT SAME ROUTE OF SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS FOR WHATEVER VIOLATIONS HAVE BEEN ACCRUING OVER THESE YEARS COME BACK IN FRONT OF ANOTHER MAGISTRATE TO TRY TO GET THOSE FINES REDUCED. POSSIBLY GET A BUYER FOR THAT PROPERTY SO THAT IN THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY WE CAN TAKE CARE OF WHATEVER WE HAVE OR OWE FOR THE CITY. AND JUST TRY TO MAKE THINGS RIGHT. >> THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING FOR ME. ON THE ISSUE OF THIS EXTENSION, REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, HOW MUCH TIME ARE YOU ASKING FOR? >> I CANNOT GIVE YOU A DATE BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHEN I'M GOING TO ACTUALLY HAVE A DATE SCHEDULED TO APPEAR AGAIN FOR THE FINE REDUCTION ON 15TH STREET. THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE AS OF RIGHT NOW ADDRESSED BEFORE WE COULD EVEN SELL THE ROSARITA PROPERTY. >> HELP ME UNDERSTAND. IS IT MEANT TO BE -- I'M HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING WHY ONE PROPERTIES HINDERING THE OTHER. IS IT A PACKAGE DEAL THAT'S BEING DONE? >> IT'S NOT A PACKAGE DEAL. JUST AS WITH THE SALE OF THE AVENUE H PROPERTY WE HAVE CHRISTOPHER VALERIE AND MYSELF INHERITED THIS PROPERTY MORE THAN 20 YEARS AGO. MY AUNT AND UNCLE PASSED AWAY. I'VE BASICALLY BEEN THE ONLY ONE TRYING TO ADDRESS ANY OF THESE VIOLATIONS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. WE ACTUALLY NEED TO DO A CHANGE OF ADDRESS BECAUSE THE LETTERS KEEP GOING TO MY SISTER'S ADDRESS AND SHE'S BASICALLY ACCUMULATED ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT LETTERS AND THINGS THAT I WASN'T EVEN AWARE OF UNTIL THINGS WERE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AND I'VE REACHED OUT TO TRY TO DO WHATEVER I CAN TO RECTIFY THIS ONGOING PROPERTY ISSUE. SO THOSE FINES ON 15TH STREET DID NOT HINDER THE SALE OF AVENUE H BECAUSE IT WASN'T A PACKAGE DEAL. THAT'S WHY I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY THE FINES ON 15TH STREET IS HINDERING THE SALE OF THE ROSARITA PROPERTY BECAUSE IT TOO IS NOT A PACKAGE DEAL. I NEEDED SOME CLARIFICATION ON THAT AS WELL AND I WAS NOT ABLE TO RECEIVE ANY. >> SORRY TO INTERRUPT. YOU SAID YOU'VE SPOKEN TO MS MS. CALDERON. >> SHE INFORMED ME THE TITLE COMPANY WHEN THEY PULL ALL THEIR INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPERTY, IT PULLS UP ALL THE OWNERS AND ALL THE PROPERTIES THAT THEY HAVE AND UPON PULLING THAT UP AND SHE SAW THE VIOLATIONS ON 15TH STREET, SHE -- THIS IS HOW SHE EXPLAINED IT TO ME. NOT MISS IS CALLED HER OWN BUT THE TITLE COMPANY ONCE I FOUND OUT WHAT THE TITLE COMPANY HAD DONE WHEN THEY WERE PULLING THE INFORMATION FOR ROSARITA THEY PULLED ALL THE PROPERTIES UNDER THE THREE OWNERS NAMES. AND SHE EXPLAINED TO ME THAT BASICALLY ANY LIENS OR FINES ON THE 15TH STREET PROPERTY WOULD BASICALLY BE EITHER PASSED ON OR ASSESSED TO THE BUYERS OF THE ROWS OF -- ROSARITA PROPERTY. I DIDN'T TRY TO UNDERSTAND THAT. I TRIED TO STAY IN MY LANE AND ASK FOR CLARIFICATION FOR THE THINGS I DON'T UNDERSTAND BUT SHE TOO COULD NOT EXPLAIN TO ME WHY IS IT THAT THOSE FINES AND LIENS WERE THERE ON THE 15TH STREET PROPERTY WHEN WE SOLD THE AVENUE H PROPERTY AND THERE WERE NO PROBLEMS WITH SELLING THE PROPERTY. >> DO SEEMS TO BE A LITTLE MORE COMPLEX THAN -- THERE'S MORE TO IT, RIGHT? I HAVE NO DOCUMENTATION IN FRONT OF ME TO LOOK AT. I DON'T HAVE THE FILES SO I THINK WHAT WE SHOULD DO, WE CAN GO AHEAD AND FOCUS ON THIS PARTICULAR ONE, FOCUS ON THE EXTENSION AND THEN I CAN GIVE YOU MY DIRECT NUMBER AND WE CAN TALK AND TRY TO FIND OUT A LITTLE BIT MORE ON WHAT'S GOING ON WITH ALL THESE OTHER PROPERTIES BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO TELL YOU ANY INFORMATION WITHOUT ME ACTUALLY HAVING THOSE FILES IN FRONT OF ME. SO I THINK FOR NOW WHAT WE SHOULD GO AHEAD AND DO IS FOCUS ON THE EXTENSION. BASED ON THE RULES AND PROCEDURE [00:40:03] WE CAN GIVE UP TO A YEAR WITH THAT EXTENSION. HOWEVER THERE'S BEEN IN THAT YEAR ALREADY 90 DAYS THAT HAVE BEEN -- WERE APPROACHING THOSE 90 DAYS. ESSENTIALLY THEY HAVE ANOTHER NINE MONTHS TO GET THAT 3640-DOLLAR SPACE. AGAIN SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, I THINK WE'RE KIND OF GOING INTO MUCH MORE DETAILED THAN WHAT IS PRESENTED OR WHAT I HAVE IN FRONT OF ME. SO I THINK WE SHOULD FOCUS ON THIS CASE AND THEN HER AND I CAN TALK AND MS. CALDERON IS ALSO OUT THIS WEEK. I'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO KAT TO TRY TO GET MORE INFORMATION ON WHAT WAS SAID AND WHAT SHE HAS ON HER RECORDS. >> OKAY, THANK YOU. I'D LIKE SOME CLARIFICATION TO BECAUSE I DON'T UNDERSTAND ALL OF IT. I'M DOING THE BEST AND ALL THAT I KNOW TO DO. SO IF I HAVE TO FILL OUT APPLICATIONS AND KEEP APPEARING IN FRONT OF YOU, I WILL DO WHAT I NEED TO DO. I WILL DO WHAT I CAN DO AS ONE-THIRD OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS. I HAVE TO TRY TO BE AS PROACTIVE AS I CAN NOW THAT THIS HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION. >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU MS. JOHNSON FOR HUME RING ME THERE. I WANTED TO KIND OF GET AN IDEA FOR HOW MUCH TIME NEEDED. IN THE MEANTIME, HERE'S WHAT I'M PREPARED TO DO. I'M PREPARED TO GRANT A 90 DAY EXTENSION JUST SO WE CAN KEEP EYES ON THIS AND IF, FOR SOME REASON, YOU NEED ADDITIONAL TIME, COME BACK. BUT I HOPE THAT'S ENOUGH TIME FOR YOU TO SETTLE THIS ISSUE WITH THE 15TH STREET PROPERTY. JUST KNOW IF IT'S NOT PAID WITHIN THAT 90 DAYS IT WILL BE BACK TO THAT FULL 36,400 BUT AGAIN IF YOU DO NEED ADDITIONAL TIME, LET US KNOW FROM THERE. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH. >> THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN AND EXPLAINING. >> I WROTE DOWN MY NUMBER HERE. [INDISCERNIBLE] >> VERY GOOD. NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> ABSOLUTELY. [1. Case Number: CE-2025-722 Investigating Officer: Heather Debevec Violation Location: 2111 Hills Ct] >> THE NEXT CASE IS FOUR C1 CASE CE2025-722, 2111 HILLS COURT. CE-2025-722. 2111 HILLS COURT. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER CE-2 CE-2025-72242111 HILLS COURT. AT THE CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE. NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUE WAS DATED NOVEMBER 4TH 2025. THE VIOLATIONS EXTERIOR STRUCTURE -- EMERGENCY ESCAPE OPENINGS. THE CITY REQUESTS IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS WITH THE FOLLOWING A VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO REPAIR THE DAMAGED OR ROTTING FASCIA BOARD, REMOVE THE BOARD FROM THE WINDOW, OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY PERMITS TO COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WOULD RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED. I DO HAVE PHOTOS IN WHICH TO SUBMIT. THEY HAVE REPLACED THE ROTTING WOOD BUT THE WINDOW IS STILL COVERED AND THE WOOD IS BARE THERE. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS HAVE BEEN TAKEN BY YOU. >> YES, MA'AM. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> HAVE YOU SPOKEN WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER? >> I'VE SPOKEN WITH A LADY AT THE PROPERTY ONCE OR TWICE AND THAT'S BEEN QUITE SOME TIME WHEN WE WERE DOING THIS NONOPERATIVE VEHICLE CASES. SHE SAID THEY WERE TRYING TO WORK ON MAKING REPAIRS TO THE HOUSE. YOU CAN SEE BY THE PHOTOS HE'S PUT FORTH EFFORT INTO TRYING TO DO THAT. THE WINDOW IS BY THE GARAGE AREA -- [00:45:04] >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> CORRECT. LACK THANK YOU. IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE FOLLOWING BE ORDERED. THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO REPAIR THE DAMAGED OR ROTTING FASCIA BOARD, REMOVE THE BOARD FROM THE WINDOW AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY PERMITS AND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. [2. Case Number: CE-2026-29 Investigating Officer: Heather Debevec Violation Location: 1915 N US Highway 1] NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> NEXT CASES 4C2 CASE NUMBER CE-2026-29. 1915 NORTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER CE 20 2026-29, 1950 NORTH U.S. HIGHWA. WERE -- IS ACCORDANT -- CODE ENFORCEMENT WHERE WERE REQUESTING REVIEW AND DETERMINATION. JANUARY 16TH 2026 OWNED BY HANLEX FORT PIERCE U.S. ONE LLC. FOR NUISANCE OF OUTSIDE STORAGE. THE CITY REQUEST IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND A VIOLATION OF SECTION 24-19 SUBSECTION SIX SUBSECTION A NUISANCE OUTSIDE STORAGE THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THAT A VIOLATION OF SECTION 24-19... THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE VIOLATOR BE NOTIFIED THAT IF A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION OCCURS AGAIN ON ANY PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VIOLATOR THAT PURSED EIGHT STATUTE 162.06 SUBSECTION THREE ADDITIONAL TIME TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON THE MATTER WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THAT PURSED EIGHT STATUTE 162.09 SUBSECTION ONE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE MAY ORDER A BIND TO ACCRUE FOR EACH DAY THE REPEAT VIOLATION CONTINUES, BEGINNING WITH THE DATE THE REPEAT VIOLATION IS FOUND TO HAVE OCCURRED BY THE CODE INSPECTOR. THAT PURSED EIGHT STATUTE 162.09 SUBSECTION TWO SUBSECTION A THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE FOR THE REPEAT VIOLATION MAY BE UP TO $500 PER DAY. I DO HAVE PHOTOS IF YOU WISH TO SEE THEM. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS. >> YES, MA'AM. >> THE CITY MOVES INTO EVIDENCE... >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS AND EVIDENCE OF CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONTACT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER? >> I'VE HAD CONTACT WITH SOMEBODY FOR THE PROPERTY. THAT'S HOW WE WERE TRAINED TO MAKE EFFORTS TO GET THIS CLEANED UP. THEY HAD GOING AND TRYING TO CLEAN UP THE PROPERTY. THERE IS A HOMELESS POPULATION THAT DOES HANG OUT IN THAT AREA. ALSO TRAINED TO WORK WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AS THEIR PROPERTY IS POSTED, BUT WHERE IT'S POSTED IS BACK ON THE HOUSE WHICH IS A COUPLE HUNDRED FEET FROM WHERE THIS MURAL AND DEBRIS WAS. THEY DID GET IT CLEANED UP BUT IT DID TAKE SOME EFFORT AND COORDINATION WITH CHECKING ON THINGS. THEY'RE AWARE OF THE PROBLEM AND THEY'RE TRYING TO TAKE CARE OF IT. >> IS THIS A BUSINESS? >> IT'S ACTUALLY A HOUSE THAT'S VACANT. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE PROPERTY BACK BEHIND IT WHICH IS COMMERCIAL IS WORKING WITH THIS OWNER TO PULL IT ALL TOGETHER BECAUSE BEHIND IT I GUESS THE PLASMA IS TRYING TO GO IN AND TRYING TO GIVE ACCESS CONNECTING FROM HERE AS WELL. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> THE HANLEX FORT PIERCE. YES. >> THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS COURT FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS. IN THAT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO [00:50:07] REMOVE THOSE SLEEPING BAGS, BLANKETS, CLOTHING, TRASH AND OTHER ITEMS FROM THE BUSHES AND AROUND THE PROPERTY. AND SO FAR AS THEY HAVE NOT ALREADY BEEN DONE. FAILURE TO DO SO WITHIN 30 DAYS WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $500 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED. >> YOUR HONOR THE PROPERTY HAS COMPLIED. WERE REQUESTING REVIEW AND DETERMINATION SO THEY DO -- THAT WE HAVE SOMETHING TO WORK WITH BECAUSE WE DO GET COMPLAINTS ON THIS PROPERTY EVERY SO OFTEN. >> I UNDERSTAND. SO BASICALLY WHAT ARE YOU ENVISIONING IT LOOKS LIKE IF THEY DID COME OUT OF COMPLIANCE? >> IF THEY CAME BACK OUT OF COMPLIANCE I WOULD SEND THEM A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ALSO SCHEDULE THEM POSTHASTE FOR A HEARING DIRECTLY. AND HOPE THAT THEY WOULD TAKE CARE OF IT FOR THE HEARING BUT IT WOULD STILL COME BEFORE A MAGISTRATE TO DETERMINE AS TO WHETHER THOSE FINES WOULD START FROM THE DAY IT WAS INITIATED AND IF IT WOULD BE THE $500 A DAY OR IF THE MAGISTRATE SAID THEY BROUGHT IT BACK INTO COMPLIANCE WITHIN A FEW DAYS, THIS IS WHAT WERE DOING, THAT WOULD BE ABRIDGED ACROSS SHOULD THAT HAPPEN. >> HOW DOES THIS DIFFER FROM ANY OTHER CASE WHERE THEY CAME INTO COMPLIANCE AND NOW A YEAR LATER THEY HAD SOME OTHER VIOLATION? WOULDN'T IT NORMALLY BE NOTICED AGAIN AND GO THROUGH THE SAME PROCEDURES AS NORMAL? I WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHY IS THIS ONE DIFFERENT? >> WITH A NORMAL CODE CASE IF WE DON'T BRING IT BEFORE YOU AND HAVE REVIEW AND DETERMINATION SET IN PLACE, THEN IT WOULD JUST START IN AN INITIAL CASE WHERE IT'S TYPICALLY 100 OR 250 DEPENDING ON THE PROPERTY. THIS ONE COULD BE UP TO $500 OF IT THE REPEAT. DETERMINES IT WOULD BE REPEAT VIOLATION JUST MOVING FORWARD. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> OKAY. SO YOU REASONABLY THIS WILL HAPPEN AGAIN. IS THIS WHAT IT IS? >> YES, SIR, BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE AREA WITH THE HOMELESS POPULATION. AFTER SPEAKING WITH THE OWNERS I BELIEVE THEY ARE PUTTING FORTH EFFORTS TO TRY TO MITIGATE THE ISSUE BUT IT'S AN ISSUE. >> OKAY. WELL THANK YOU MS. DEBEVEC. I WILL SIGN AN ORDER ALLOWING YOU -- GRANTING YOU THAT ABILITY. AND JUST HAVE IT PREPARED FOR MY REVIEW. NEXT CASE PLEASE. [1. Case Number: LTCL-2026-32 Investigating Officer: Manuel Fernandez Jr. Violation Location: N 16th CT (2404-516-0010-000-3)] >> THE NEXT CASE IS FOR D1 CASE LTC OHIO AND 2026-32 NORTH 16TH COURT PARCEL NUMBER 2 NUMBER 2404-516-0010-000-3. BMO GOOD MORNING YOUR HONOR. >> AND MORNING. >> MY NAME IS MANUEL FERNANDEZ JR. I'M AN EMPLOYEE WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT. I HAVE CASE BEFORE YOU LTC A-2026-32, NORTH 16TH COURT PARCEL I.D. 2404-516-0010-000-3. IT'S A LOT CLEARING. THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE TO APPEAR WAS ISSUED ON MARCH 3RD 2026 AND WAS SENT VIA REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAILING AS WELL AS POSTED AT THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS A CLARA DENMARK. THEY WERE CITED 2419 SUBSECTION'S 11 A AND B NUISANCES LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 3-ACRE PROPERTY. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS IN THE VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE AND THAT SUCH NUISANCE CONDITIONS POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC, -- HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY ENDED BE ADDRESSED THROUGH THE CITIES NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM ALL TREES, [00:55:01] SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARD IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION. REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY TO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 A DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY AND -- IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION THE COST OF WHICH IS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. I HAVE PHOTOS INTRODUCED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] AND PHOTOGRAPHS DATED APRIL 6TH. ALL THE PHOTOGRAPHS, DID YOU TAKE THEM? >> YES, MA'AM. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> YES, MA'AM,. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS AND EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONTACT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER? >> NO, MA'AM. I BELIEVE WE DID GET RETURNED MAIL AND STATED IT WAS UNCLAIMED S I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER RECEIVED THE NOTICE OR THEY NO LONGER RESIDE AT THE PROPERTY OR THE ADDRESS LISTED ON THE PROPERTY. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> YES, MA'AM. YES, MA'AM. >> THANK YOU. IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND SUCH NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED -- THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION. AND REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY TO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION. THE COST OF WHICH IS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. [2. Case Number: LTCL-2026-33 Investigating Officer: Manuel Fernandez Jr. Violation Location: N 16th ST (2404-516-0016-000-5)] NEXT CASE PLEASE. THANK YOU. >> THE NEXT CASE IS FOR FOR D2 CASE NUMBER LTC L2026-33. NORTH 16TH STREET. PARCEL NUMBER IS 2404-516-0016-000-5. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER LTC A-2026-33 AT NORTH 16TH STREET PARCEL I.D. 2404-516-0016-000-5. THIS IS A LOT CLEARING. THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION TO APPEAR WAS ISSUED ON MARCH 3RD 2026 AND WERE SENT BY CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAILING AS WELL AS POSTED AT THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY OWNER TAX LEAD FUND LLC RISK -- CITED SUBSECTIONS 11 A AND B NUISANCES LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 3-ACRE PROPERTIES PICK THE CITY REQUESTS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THAT A SPECIAL NUISANCE CODITION EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES THAT SUCH NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND THAT THE NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED OR THAN -- CITIES NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. THE VIOLATOR BECAUSE -- GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED. REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES ON THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION, THE COST OF WHICH IS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. I DO A PHOTOS TO INTRODUCE THIS NOTICE OF VIOLATION SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> YES, MA'AM,. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> THEY DO. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. [01:00:05] >> HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONTACT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER? >> NO, MA'AM,. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> YES, WE DID GET A SIGNED -- SOMEBODY WAS AWARE OF THAT THERE WAS A VIOLATION ON THE PROPERTY. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> THANK YOU. IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND SUCH NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC, -- HEALTH, SAFETY OF THE COMMUNITY. THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE NUISANCE CONDITION THE COST OF WHICH IS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE PLEASE. [6. Case Number: NOOP-2026-60 Investigating Officer: Jarvis Gamble Violation Location: 3246 Vernon ST Unit: A] >> YOUR HONOR. >> THANK YOU. >> THE NEXT CASES 4D6 CASE N O-LETTER O-LETTER P2026-60. 30 TO 46 VERNON STREET UNIT A. >> GOOD MORNING SPECIAL MAGISTRATE OFFICER. THE CASE JUST READ COMPLIED. SO WE'LL GET THAT. WE'RE GOOD THERE. [7. Case Number: LTCL-2026-34 Investigating Officer: Jarvis Gamble Violation Location: TBD (2427-603-0134-000-6)] >> EXCELLENT. >> THE NEXT CASE IS 4D7 LTC L L-2026-34. TBD PARCEL NUMBER 2427-603-0134-000-6. >> BASED ON LTC L-2026-34 VIOLATION LOCATION IS TBD 2427-603-0134-000-6. IT'S A LOT CLEARING CASE. NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED DATE WAS MARCH 10TH 2026. BY REGULAR MAIL, CERTIFIED MAIL AND POSTED A PROPERTY. NOTICE TO APPEAR ISSUE DATE WAS MARCH 10TH 2026. BY REGULAR MAIL, CERTIFIED MAIL AND POSTED A PROPERTY. POSTING DATE WAS MARCH 10TH 2026. LAST INSPECTION DATE WAS APRIL 14TH 2026. THE VIOLATOR AS HARRY BLEW FOR VIOLATION 24-19 SUBSECTION 11 SUBSECTIONS A AND B. NUISANCES LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 3-ACRE PROPERTIES. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF CODE OF ORDINANCES AND THAT SUCH NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED THROUGH THE CITY'S NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED, TRIMMED TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARD IDENTIFIED IN NOTICE OF VIOLATION. REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY IN ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION THE COST OF WHICH IS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. I DO HAVE A COPY -- COPY ON NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND RETURN GREEN CARD SIGNED AND PHOTOS TO PRESENT. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGAPHS? >> YES. >> [INDISCERNIBLE]. >> YES. >> FROM APRIL 3RD AS WELL. >> RIGHT. >> [INDISCERNIBLE] >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS AND EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> HAVE YOU HEARD FROM THE OWNER? >> I SPOKE WITH THE PROPERTY MANAGER. THEY WERE MADE AWARE BACK IN MARCH. I ACTUALLY SPOKE WITH THEM ON THE PHONE. THEY'VE STARTED SOME WORK IN THE AREA BUT AS FAR AS THE GREEN CARD BEING RETURNED, THAT'S THE LAST ENCOUNTER I HAD. >> IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS AND SUCH NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED TO THE CITY'S NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. [01:05:01] GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIMMED TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION THE COST OF WHICH IS TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. [8. Case Number: LTCL-2026-35 Investigating Officer: Jarvis Gamble Violation Location: TBD (2427-603-0135-000-3)] NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASES 4D8 CASE NUMBER LTC L-2026-35. TBD PARCEL NUMBER 2427-603-0135-000-3. >> CASE NUMBER LTC L-2026-35 TBD 2427-603-0135-000-3. THIS IS A LOT CLEARING CASE NOTICE OF VIOLATION, NOTICE TO APPEAR ISSUED MARCH 10TH 2026. MY -- BY REGULAR MAIL, CERTIFIED MAIL AND POSTED AT PROPERTY. POSTING DATE ALSO MARCH 10TH. 2026. BY REGULAR MAIL, CERTIFIED MAIL AND POSTED AT PROPERTY. LAST INSPECTION DATE ON APRIL 14TH 2026. VIOLATOR IS HARRY BLUE AND VIOLATION 24-19 SUBSECTION 11 SUBSECTIONS A AND B. NUISANCES LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 3-ACRE PROPERTIES PICK THE CITY REQUESTS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF CODE OF ORDINANCES ON SUCH NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED THROUGH THE CITY'S NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION. REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM RIGGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION THE COST OF WHICH WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. I HAVE A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION SENT OUT AS WELL AS PHOTOS AND THE GREEN CARD RETURNED AND SIGNED. >> THE COST OF VIOLATION IN NOTICE 25TH MARCH 10TH APRIL 3RD AND APRIL 14TH. DID YOU TAKE ALL OF THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES. >> DO THEY TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS? >> YES. >> CITY MOVES INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE ONE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONTACT -- >> SPOKE ON THE PHONE. THE SAME PROPERTY MANAGER FROM THE LAST CASE. AS WELL AS THE GREEN CARD -- >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY. >> THANK YOU. IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES ON SUCH A NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED THROUGH THE CITY'S NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION. AND REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DATE THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO IT -- ABATE THE NUIANCE CONDITIONS THE COST OF WHICH TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST A PROPERTY WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. [9. Case Number: LTCL-2026-36 Investigating Officer: Jarvis Gamble Violation Location: TBD (2427-603-0136-000-0)] NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS 4D9 CASE NUMBER LTC L-2026-36 TBD PARCEL NUMBER 2427-603-0 1:30 6-000-0. >> CASE NUMBER LTC L-2026-36 TBD 2427-6 -- 603-0136-000-0. IT'S A LOT CLEARING PICK THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION A NOTICE OF -- TO APPEAR DATE MARCH 10TH 2026 BY REGULAR MAIL, CERTIFIED MAIL AND POSTED AT PROPERTY. POSTING DATE MARCH 10TH 2026. LAST INSPECTION DATE APRIL 14TH 2026 VIOLATOR IS HARRY BLUE. VIOLATION 24-19 SUBSECTION 11 SUBSECTIONS A AND B NUISANCE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 3-ACRE PROPERTIES PICK REQUIRING THE CITY -- SPECIAL [01:10:03] MAGISTRATE FIND IN VIOLATION OF CODE OF ORDINANCES ON SUCH CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED IN THE CITY'S NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN NOTICE OF VIOLATION. REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. WITH FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY OF THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION, THE COST OF WHICH WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY. I'VE A COPY ON NOTICE OF VIOLATION SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER AS WELL AS PHOTOS TO THE VIOLATION AND GREEN CARD HOW MUCH WAS RETURNED, SIGNED. >> PROVIDING A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION FEBRUARY 25TH, MARCH 10TH, APRIL 3RD AND APRIL 14TH. DID YOU TAKE ALL THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES. >> THE VIOLATION AS YOU'VE OBSERVED IT? >> YES. >> THE CITY MOVES INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE ONE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> OFFICER DID YOU SPEAK WITH THE PROPERTY MANAGER. >> HE'S BEEN MADE AWARE. >> THE SAME PROPERTY MANAGER? NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY. >> THANK YOU. IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A NUISANCE CONDITION EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND SUCH NUISANCE CONDITION POSES A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY. THAT THE NUISANCE BE ADDRESSED TO THE CITY'S NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROGRAM. THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN SEVEN DAYS TO CUT ALL GRASS AND WEEDS AS NEEDED AND TRIM OH TREES, SHRUBS AND BUSHES TO THE STANDARDS IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND REMOVE ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS INCLUDING LANDSCAPE DEBRIS GENERATED FROM BRINGING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. FAILURE TO COMPLY BY THE DATE ORDERED WILL RESULT IN A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BEING ASSESSED FOR EACH DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THE CITY IS TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO A DATE -- ABATE THE NUISANCE CONDITION THE COST OF WHICH TO BE ASSESSED IN THE PROPERTY WITH 30 DAYS TO [a. IDENTIFICATION OF CASES IN COMPLIANCE OR RESCHEDULED] APPEAL. IS THAT OUR LAST CASE FOR TODAY? >> YES, BUT I DO HAVE A LIST OF CASES TO CALL THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLIED OR RESCHEDULED. >> THANK YOU. >> CASE NUMBER N O-LETTER O-LETTER P -- THE CASE NUM NUMBER 1126 COLONNADES DRIVE. CASE NUMBER CE-2026-10 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1. CASE CE-2026-20, 1122 COLONNADES DRIVE. CASE N O-LETTER O-LETTER P-2026-59, 809 REVELS LANE. CASE NUMBER N O-LETTER O-LETTER P2026-48805 -- ZERO... CASE AND OOP 202-65-2917 SOUTHLAKE DRIVE. CASE NUMBER NOOP-2026-53, 920 SOUTHLAKE DRIVE. CASE NUMBER NOOP-2026-54, 920 SOUTHLAKE DRIVE. CASE NUMBER NOOP-2026-56, 805 SOUTHLAKE DRIVE UNIT B. CASE NUMBER NOOP-2026-613248 VERNON STREET. CASE NUMBER NOOP-2026-55, 805 SOUTHLAKE DRIVE UNIT A CASE NUMBER CE-225-674, 3214 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1. CASE NUMBER NOOP-20 TOURNEY 6-58, 809 KING ORANGE DRIVE. CASE NUMBER NOOP-2026-26, 3101 TENNESSEE AVENUE. CASE NUMBER CE-2026-57, 3101 TENNESSEE AVENUE. CASE NUMBER NOOP-2026-28, 3101 TENNESSEE AVENUE. CASE NUMBER LTC L2026-31, 1306 NORTH'S -- 16TH COURT. FOR THE CASES REQUIRE NOTICE OF [01:15:05] STATE STATUTE 162.12 IN NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE VIOLATORS BY MAIL AND THE CARD HAS RETURNED SIGNED AND IS PLACED IN THE FILE. THE CARD RETURNED UNSIGNED OR UNCLAIMED IS AN AFFIDAVIT WITH NOTICE OF HEARING CLOSED AND MAILED TO THE VIOLATOR. TEN DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING A NOTICE OF HEARING IS SENT REGULAR U.S. MAIL WITH AN AFFIDAVIT. ATTACHED OF ALL THE DOCUMENTS AND THE FILE TEN DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING IS -- A NOTICE OF HEARING IS POSTED ON THE LOBBY OF CITY HALL. A NOTICE OF HEARING IS ALSO POSTED AT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH AN AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING. IF THE CERTIFICATION PART IS -- CARD IS NOT RETURNED TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT IN TEN DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING POSTING IS COMPLETED THE SAME WAY IF THE CARD IS RETURNED UNCLAIMED. THAT'S ALL THE CASES FOR * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.