[1. CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:10] >> SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING OF JUNE 11TH 2026 IS CALLED TO ORDER. COULD WE PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE? I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND [a. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH TO DEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES] JUSTICE FOR ALL. PLEASE REMAIN STANDING. >> PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU WILL GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH QUESTION YOU CAN HAVE A SEAT. >> ALL RIGHT. BEFORE WE GET STARTED THIS MORNING, IS ANYONE HERE IN NEED OF AN INTERPRETER OR THE ASSISTANCE OF A HEARING DEVICE? IF SO COME ON LET US KNOW AND ONE WILL BE PROVIDED FOR YOU. IN FRONT OF YOU THIS MORNING, YOU HAVE ATTORNEY HOLLOMAN REPRESENTING THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. YOU HAVE MISS RICKER FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT COME ON MRS. BECK FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, AND MISS LUNA AS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE CLERK. I AM JAMIE BERROA AND I WILL BE SERVING AS YOUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE THIS MORNING. PLEASE NOTE FOR YOUR BACKGROUND, THESE PROCEEDINGS WILL BE LIVE STREAMED AND RECORDED THIS MORNING. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE RECEIVED THE CITATION OR VIOLATION NOTICE, WE WILL REFER TO YOU AS RESPONDENTS THIS MORNING. IT'S IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND HOW THESE PROCEEDINGS ARE GOING TO UNFOLD. FIRST, THE CITY WILL PRESENT ITS CASE THROUGH EVIDENCE. THAT EVIDENCE MAY INCLUDE THINGS SUCH AS THE TESTIMONY OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, INVESTIATORS, POLICE OFFICERS, OR OTHER WITNESSES. THE EVIDENCE MAY ALSO INCLUDE PHYSICAL ITEMS SUCH AS PHOTOGRAPHS. WE WILL REFER TO THOSE AS EXHIBITS. THE STANDARD OF PROOF THIS MORNING IS WHETHER A VIOLATION HAS BEEN PROVEN BASED ON COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. YOU AS A RESPONDENT WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE LEGAL OBJECTIONS AND CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES IF YOU SO CHOOSE. ONCE THE CITY HAS FINISHED PRESENTING ITS CASE, YOU AS A RESPONDENT WILL THEN BE ALLOWED TO MAKE A STATEMENT, PRESENT YOUR OWN TESTIMONY THROUGH WITNESSES, PRESENT YOUR OWN PHYSICAL EVIDENCE SUCH AS DOCUMENTS AND PHOTOGRAPHS. AND THEN I AS YOUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE WILL RENDER THE FINAL RULING. I JUST ASK THAT EVERYONE MAINTAIN AND CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN A CALM AND RESPECTFUL MANNER AT ALL TIMES DURING THESE PROCEEDINGS AND DIRECT ANY COMMENTS TO ME DIRECTLY AS YOUR SPECIAL MAGISTRATE. THAT BEING SAID COME ON MISS LUNA, MAY WE PLEASE HAVE THE FIRST CASE. >> THE FIRST CASE IS BV 250-0278 [2. BV2025-00278 208 Maple Ave  D O Multiple Services LLC Michael Waldrop] MAPLE AVENUE. FOR MULTIPLE SERVICE LLC. >> GOOD MORNING MA'AM WHAT IS YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS LATASHA CARRIE. >> HOW DO YOU SPELL YOUR LAST NAME? >> CAREY. >> WHAT IS YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY. >> I'M A AGENT FOR THE ENTITY THAT OWNS THE PROPERTY. >> AN AGENT IN WHAT SENSE? >> AN OPERATION AGENT. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GOOD MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING. I'M MICHAEL WALDROP. I AM AN INVESTIGATOR AND INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. LET ME PUT MY GLASSES ON I [00:05:02] DIDN'T KNOW I WAS FIRST. THIS IS CASE NUMBER B 202500278208 IN MAPLE AVENUE MULTIPLE SERVICE LLC. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 62025. THE VIOLATIONS ARE FBC10 5.1 2020 PERMIT REQUIRED IPMC30 3.2 2021 POOL AND SPA ENCLOSURE, IPMC50 5.3 2021 INTERIOR SURFACES. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION THAT HAS BEEN PERFORMED WITHOUT A PERMIT INCLUDING ROOF REPLACEMENT, THE CONSTRUCTION OF PATIO STRUCTURE AND ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED WITHOUT PERMITS TO INSTALL AND REPAIR POOL BARRIER AS REQUIRED, REPLACE THE DILAPIDATED FENCING. THREE IS PAINT AND REPAIR INTERIOR SURFACES OF THE STRUCTURES REQUIRED INCLUDING HOLES AND DRYWALL AND WATER DAMAGE DRYWALL. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS. THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRES SPECS IN AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED AND TO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT. BE ASSESSED. AT THIS TIME, THE PERMIT HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR AND REJECTED IN ADMINISTRATIVE INTAKE FOR SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS. I HAVE PICTURES. >> HAVE YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THESE PICTURES? >> YES, SIR. >> THANK YOU. >> OFFICER WALDROP, YOU PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS DATED OCTOBER 3RD LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES. >> ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHS TRULY INACCURATELY DEPICTING THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU INTERPRET THEM? >> YES, MA'AM. >> THE CITY MOVES THE EVIDENCE COMPOSITE ONE. >> THANK YOU. I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS THE CITY'S COMPOSITE EVIDENCE ONE. >> INVESTIGATOR WALDROP, HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONTACT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER? >> WE HAVE SPOKEN NOT THE OWNER, BUT THE REPRESENTATIVE. WE HAVE SPOKEN A FEW TIMES. WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE POOL BARRIER SOME OF THE GATES WERE TAKEN CARE OF AT LEAST QUICKLY. I THINK THAT WAS PRIOR. WE HAD AN EXTENSION SET FOR T THAT. SHE DID GET THAT COMPLIED WITH. FOR THE GATES. >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY. >> THANK YOU. MISS CARRIE COME ON TELL ME COME ON WHAT'S GOING ON? >> EVERYTHING UP UNTIL -- EVERYTHING HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR AS FAR AS PERMITTING HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR, APPLIED FOR, ISSUED, AND CLOSED EXCEPT FOR THE LAST PART OF THE PERMIT HE IS SPEAKING OF AND I BELIEVE THAT REJECTION WAS YESTERDAY SO I DID NOT HAVE TIME TO RESPOND YET. AS FAR AS EVERYTHING ELSE THAT IS ON THE LIST, THE PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPLIED FOR, ISSUED, AND CLOSED OUT. THE LAST ONE HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR, SO I JUST HAVE TO RESPOND TO THE COMMENTS AND GET IT IN REVIEW AND THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN CARE OF TO CLOSE THIS CASE. ONCE THAT IS DONE, JUST CALLING FOR A FINAL REVIEW. >> THANK YOU. THE NATURE OF THIS REJECTION, I SEE THAT THERE IS A 60 DAY RECOMMENDATION HERE TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE. DO WE FIND THAT IS A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME BASED OFF OF THE NATURE OF -- I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE ACTUAL OBJECTION OR REJECTION WAS BASED ON. IT SOUNDED LIKE IT WAS ADMINISTRATIVE IN NATURE. >> THE DRAWINGS ARE PROVIDED. LIKE I SAY COME I HAVE NOT SEEN THE REJECTION HE IS SPEAKING OF YET SO I WILL LOOK AT IT AND RESPOND TO THE COMMENTS AND THEN THE PERMITS SHOULD GO INTO REVIEW AND ANY OTHER COMMENTS I WILL ADDRESS UNTIL IT IS ISSUED AND THEN ONCE WE GET IT CLOSED OUT COME I WILL CALL HIM FOR A FINAL WALKTHROUGH OF THE PROPERTY AND TO CLOSE OUT THE CASE. BUT WE HAVE BEEN PROACTIVE ON EVERYTHING ELSE LIKE BRINGING IT UP TO CODE AND COMPLIANCE. AS FAR AS 60 DAYS, I AM NOT SURE OF BECAUSE IT DOES HAVE TO GO THROUGH A FEW OTHER HANDS, I BELIEVE, IN THE PROCESS BUT OUR JOB IS TO GET IT COMPLIED. [00:10:04] >> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANTED TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? >> NO, SIR. >> MR. WALDROP, ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? >> NO. >> YES. IT IS PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS MISSING AND THE ROOF HAS TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY. >> OKAY. THAT'S PAPERWORK THAT I CAN GET TAKEN CARE OF. AS FAR AS THE REVIEW PROCESS, IT MIGHT TAKE A LITTLE MORE THAN 60 DAYS. I'M NOT SURE. I WILL GET THEM THE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND APPLY FOR THE ROOF SEPARATELY. >> EXCELLENT. HERE'S WHAT I'M PREPARED TO DO. I'M PREPARED TO GIVE YOU 90 DAYS JUST TO ACCOUNT FOR THE DIFFERENT HANDS THAT NEED TO TOUCH THIS TO MAKE IT COME INTO COMPLIANCE, BUT I DO THANK YOU FOR YOUR DILIGENCE TO GETTING US WHERE WE ARE NOW. THAT BEING SAID, IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATED WILL BE GIVEN 90 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS, AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A AND THERE IS 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE. BUT I THANK YOU FOR GETTING THIS RECTIFIED FOR THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR GETTING THIS RECTIFIED, THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN THIS MORNING. [3. BV2025-00307 1303 N 24th St   Sunstate Homebuyers LLC  Michael Waldrop] NEXT CASE, PLEASE. >> OUR NEXT CASE, 13 '03 NORTH 24TH STREET. HOME BUYERS LLC IS THE OWNER. >> GOOD MORNING. >> GOOD MORNING, SIR. WHAT IS YOUR NAME? >> GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS JOEL DIAZ. >> AS IN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY? >> YES, SIR. >> WONDERFUL. >> WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME? >> THIS IS CASE BV2025-00307, 13 '03 NORTH 24TH STREET HERE SON STATE HOME BUYERS LLC. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON OCTOBER 23RD, 2025. THE VIOLATIONS ARE FBC 1.51 PERMIT REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTION IS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE REBUILDING OF THE FRONT PORCH AND SUPPORT COLUMNS. THE CITY REQUESTED THE FINES VIOLATION EXISTS. THE VIOLATOR GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT AND OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS, AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND HERE OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR FINE OF $250 WILL BE ASSESSED. AT THIS TIME, THERE IS NO PERMIT FOR THE WORK HERE. >> I DO HAVE PICTURES HERE. >> YOU PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS DATED OCTOBER 23RD OF LAST YEAR, DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? DID THEY TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION THE CITY MOVES IN THE EVIDENCE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITY COMPOSITE ONE. >> MR. DIAZ, TELL ME WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? >> I RECEIVED A VIOLATION FOR MY ROOF A FEW MONTHS PRIOR TO THE PORCH BEING REBUILT. WHEN THE ROOFERS CAME TO DO THE ROOF, THEY ASKED ME IF I WANTED TO GET THE PORCH DONE SO I SAID WHY NOT. I GOT THE ROOF PERMIT PASS AND THEN I RECEIVED THE VIOLATION FOR THE PORCH. IT COMPLETELY SLIPPED MY MIND. I PULLED MY PERMITS FOR THE OTHER VIOLATIONS THAT THE PROPERTY RECEIVED AND I HAVE MY GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORKING ON THE PERMIT FOR THIS BY THE END OF THIS WEEK HE SHOULD HAVE IT PULLED. >> THAT IS GOOD NEWS IS THERE ANYONE OCCUPYING THE PROPERTY? >> THE PROPERTY IS VACANT. >> ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? >> ON THIS PROPERTY OR IN GENERAL? >> ON THIS PROPERTY. >> ON THIS PROPERTY, NO. >> EXCELLENT. ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED [00:15:01] INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED MR. DIAZ, YOU DO HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE. THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR GETTING [4. BV2025-00322  56 Manor Dr  Yes Sandhill EXP LLC  Logan Winn] THIS RECTIFIED. NEXT CASE, PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS FOR C FOR CASE NUMBER BB2025-2022, 56 MAYNARD DRIVE. >> GOOD MORNING WHAT IS YOUR NAME? >> SEAN PRITCHARD. >> CAN YOU SPELL YOUR LAST NAME? >> PR I. TCHARD. >> WHAT'S YOUR RELATION TO THE PROPERTY? WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME? >> I'M A BUILDING INSPECTOR/INVESTIGATOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. TODAY I HAVE CASE NUMBER BV2025-3022, 56 MANOR DRIVE. THE CASE WAS INITIATED NOVEMBER 12TH 2025. THE OWNER OF 505 SOUTH SYRACUSE STREET SUITE 1200, DENVER, COLORADO, 80237-388 FEAR A VIOLATION FBC105 -- EXPIRED PERMITS. THE CORRECTIVE ACTION, RENEW EXPIRED PLUMBING PERMIT, RPLNG2024-100 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WATER METER AND EXPANSION VALVE OR OBTAIN A NEW PERMIT. THE RECOMMENDATION, REQUEST THAT THEY FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS THE VIOLATOR HAS BEEN GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT. COMPLY WITH ALL LOAD PERMIT CONDITIONS AND ALL VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED FOR CURRENTLY THE PERMIT IS STILL EXPIRED. THIS WAS AN ADMINISTRATIVE CASE. THERE ARE NO PICTURES HERE. >> ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? >> NO, SIR. >> MR. PRITCHARD, WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME? >> WE HAVE SENT A LETTER TO THE COMPANY THAT PULLED THOSE PERMITS TO LET THEM KNOW WE ARE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD. HE CALLED ME, IS WORKING ON A PERTINENT. I HAVE 19 OF THEM. HE IS WORKING ON THOSE PERMITS PERMITS. >> FANTASTIC. ANYTHING YOU WANT TO BRING TO MY ATTENTION? >> NO. I AM TRYING TO GET IT DONE AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. >> THAT'S WHAT I'D LIKE TO HEAR. IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. MR. PRITCHARD, YOU DO HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE. [6. BV2025-00327  29 Manor Dr  Yes Sandhill EXP LLC  Michael Waldrop] NEXT CASE, PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS LETTER -- CASE NUMBER BV2025-29 MAYNARD DRIVE. >> WE'VE GOT A FEW FOR YOU THIS MORNING. >> ARE THEY ALL IN A ROW? >> WE WON'T MAKE YOU GO BACK AND FORTH. MR. WALDROP, WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME? >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER BV2025-00327, 29 MANNER DRIVE FOR THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON NOVEMBER 20 NOVEMBER 142025. THE OWNER 50/50 SOUTH SYRACUSE SUITE 1200 DENVER, COLORADO, DEC 80237-288. VIOLATIONS ARE EXPIRED PERMITS APPEAR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IS TO RENEW THE EXPIRED PLUMBING PERMIT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WATER METER AND EXPANSION VALVE OR OBTAIN A NEW PERMIT. THE CITY REQUESTS SPECIAL -- FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS BECAUSE THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 A DAY BE [00:20:05] ASSESSED. THIS PERMIT IS STILL EXPIRED. >> MR. PRITCHARD, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO ADD TO THIS ONE? IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMITS CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED WITH 30 DAYS TO [7. BV2025-00329  59 Manor Dr  Yes Sandhill EXP LLC  Miles Keller] APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE YOUR NEXT CASE, PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS BV2025-0329. 59 MANOR DRIVE. >> I'M MILES KELLER, I'M AN INVESTIGATOR AND INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE. THE CASE NUMBER IS BV2025-00329, 59 MANOR DRIVE. THE CASE INITIATED NOVEMBER 14TH, 2025. THE VIOLATIONS ARE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 105.4 .1.1 2020 EXPIRED PERMIT POOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, RENEW EXPIRED PERMIT, PLUMBING PERMIT RPLNG2024-00145 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WATER METER AND EXPANSION VALVE OR OBTAIN A NEW PERMIT. RECOMMENDATION THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND VIOLATIONS EXIST, VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. SO FAR THE PERMIT IS STILL EXPIRED. >> MR. PRITCHARD, ANYTHING ADDITIONAL FOR THIS? IT IS THE COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED [8. BV2025-00333  21 Manor Dr  Yes Sandhill EXP LLC  Joel Smith] WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE, PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS CASE NUMBER B THE V2025-0033321 MAYNARD DRIVE. >> GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS JOEL SMITH WITH THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE, BUILDING INSPECTOR/FOURMAC INVESTIGATOR. TODAY WE HAVE CASE BV2025-0033 LOCATED AT 21 MANOR DRIVE HERE THE CASE WAS INITIATED NOVEMBER 14TH 2025 AND THE VIOLATION FBC EXPIRED PERMIT, CORRECTIVE ACTIONS RENEW EXPIRED PLUMBING PERMIT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WATER METER AND EXPANSION VALVE OR OBTAIN A NEW PERMIT. RECOMMENDATION, THE CITY REQUEST THE SPECIA MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS. THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMITS CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. AS OF NOW, THE PERMIT IS STILL EXPIRED. >> MR. PRITCHARD, ANYTHING ADDITIONAL? IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS. THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF [10. BV2025-00353  85 Sandhill Blvd  Yes Sandhill EXP LLC  Logan Winn] $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. THE NEXT CASE, PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS CASE NUMBER BB2025-00353, 85 SAND BOULEVARD. >> CASE NUMBER BV2025-00353 OF [00:25:13] 85 SANDHILL BOULEVARD. THE OWNER OF 5050 SOUTH SYRACUSE STREET SUITE 1200, DENVER, COLORADO, 80237388. VIOLATION F LETTER BY LETTER -- EXPIRED PERMIT. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, RENEW EXPIRED PLUMBING PERMIT. FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WATER METER AND EXPANSION VALVE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR RECOMMENDATION THE CITY REQUESTS A SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS VIOLATOR HAS BEEN GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL INSPECTIONS EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT IS CLOSED OR COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS OR FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED THE PERMIT IS EXPIRED AT THIS TIME. >> MR. PRITCHARD, ANYTHING FURTHER ON THIS ONE? >> I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU BECAUSE SHE HAS BEEN EXTREMELY HELPFUL TO POINT ME IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION TO GET THIS STUFF TAKEN CARE OF AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SHE HAS BEEN AMAZING. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT SHE KNOWS THAT. >> THANK YOU. IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS. THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. AND THANK YOU, MR. PRITCHARD. NEXT CASE, PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS CASE NUMBER [12. BV2025-00360  815 Dundas Ct Unit A  Hi-Land Properties LLC  Michael Waldrop] BB202,500,360, 815 DUNDAS COURT UNIT A. >> GOOD MORNING. >> WHAT IS YOUR NAME? >> MR. FERNANDEZ. >> WHAT'S YOUR RELATION TO THE PROPERTY? >> I'M HERE AS THE AGENT. >> WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME MR. WALDROP? >> I HAVE CASE BV2025-00360, 815 DUNDAS COURT, UNIT A. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED ON DECEMBER THIRD, 2025. THE OWNER IS HIGHLAND PROPERTIES LLC THE VIOLATIONS ARE ONE OF 5.1 2020 PERMITS REQUIRED. THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR ANY SIDING, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL WORK AS WELL AS ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION PERFORMED WITHOUT A PERMIT. THE RECOMMENDATION IS THE CITY RECOMMENDS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS A VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL A PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 WILL BE ASSESSED FOR AT THIS TIME THE PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR BUT REJECTED IN PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND STRUCTURAL REVIEW. I HAVE PICTURES HERE. >> YOU PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS DATED DECEMBER THIRD OF LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES, MA'AM. >> THE PHOTOGRAPHS TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU OBSERVED THEM? >> YES, MA'AM. >> THE CITY MOVES INTO EVIDENCE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> INVESTIGATOR WALDROP, HOW WERE YOU MADE AWARE OF THESE ITEMS BEING BUILT OR CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT A PERMIT? >> I NOTICED THE PILE OF DEBRIS ON THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE AND [00:30:02] THERE WAS A WHITE VAN THAT BACKED UP TO THE FRONT DOOR AND I NOTICED IN THE PILE, THERE WAS PLUMBING DEBRIS AND SIDING DEBRIS. IT WAS PRETTY APPARENT WHAT IT WAS. SO I WENT TO THE DOOR AND I SPOKE TO THE GENTLEMAN AND HE SHOWED UP WITH A PLUMBING TORCH IN HIS HAND BUT HE DIDN'T WANT ME THERE. SO I LEFT. I PULLED OFF THE PROPERTY, TOOK A FEW PICTURES AND THAT WAS IT. >> ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? >> MR. FERNANDEZ, TELL ME WHAT'S GOING ON. >> WE APPLIED FOR THE PERMIT AND THE CITY DID REJECT IT, I BELIEVE IT WAS MONDAY. THEN I REAPPLIED AGAIN ON TUESDAY. IT IS NOW WITH THE CITY DOING THEIR REVIEW. SO WE HAVE APPLIED FOR STRUCTURAL BUILDING, ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING. >> FANTASTIC. I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION HERE FOR 60 DAYS. DO YOU FIND THAT ADEQUATE TIME GIVEN THE FACT THAT YOU JUST SUBMITTED, RESUBMITTED? >> I WOULD PREFER 90. I WAS VERY IMPRESSED WITH THE CITY WITH HOW QUICKLY THEY RESPONDED ONCE I SUBMITTED THE PERMIT. THAT'S PROBABLY ONE OF THE FASTEST TURNAROUNDS I HAVE SEEN. BUT IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE CITY. I'M NOT SURE HOW LONG IT WILL TAKE THEM TO FINALLY ISSUE THE APPROVAL FOR THE PERMIT. >> ANY OBJECTION FROM THE CITY TO 90 DAYS? IT IS THIS FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 90 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRD INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED WITH 90 DAYS TO APPEAL. BUT I THINK -- I THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR GETTING THIS [16. BV2025-00365 1111 Avenue D GCIP Management LLC Logan Winn] RECTIFIED. >> THE NEXT CASE IS CASE NUMBER BV2025-00365, 1111 AVENUE DE. GCIP MANAGEMENT LLC. >> GOOD MORNING. WHAT IS YOUR NAME. >> MY NAME IS VIRGINIA ORTIZ. OH, RT LETTER BY Z. >> WHAT IS YOUR NAME? >> GUSTAVO. CEBDA. >> THANK YOU. YOU ARE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY? >> YES. >> THANK YOU YOUR. >> MY SON. >> WHAT IS YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY? >> I AM HERE TRYING TO HELP PULL ALL OF THE PERMITS BECAUSE I AM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THEY HIRED ME TO CLEAR THE VIOLATIONS THAT THEY HAVE ON THE PROPERTY. >> SO YOU ARE THE GENERAL PROPERTY -- THE PROPERTY MANAGER AND YOU'RE DOING THIS ON BEHALF OF YOUR SON. >> YES. >> WE HAVE CASE NUMBER BV2025-00365, 1111 AVENUE D. THE CASE IS INITIATED DECEMBER TENTH, 2025. THE OWNER IS GCIP MANAGEMENT LLC OF 2601 SOUTHWEST 26 LANE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 3313-2233. VIOLATIONS FBC PERMITS REQUIRED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PERFORMED WITHOUT A PERMIT. PERMITTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE RENOVATION BEING DONE. THE RECOMMENDATION, THE CITY REQUESTS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATOR SHOULD BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL INSPECTIONS AT AT LEAST 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED B ARE CURRENTLY THE ONLY ISSUED PERMIT IS FOR SHUTTERS. REROOF, SIDING AND WINDOW PERMITS ARE APPLIED FOR BUT NOT ISSUED. I DO HAVE A SET OF PICTURES OF THE PROPERTY AS WELL. >> HAVE YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THESE PICTURES? >> YES, I DID. I JUST WANT TO EXPLAIN A LITTLE ABOUT IT. >> ONE MOMENT. I WILL GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY. BUT I WILL LET THEM FINISH THEIR CASE FIRST. >> NO PROBLEM. >> THANK YOU. >> WHEN YOU PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS DATED DECEMBER TENTH OF LAST YEAR, DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES, MA'AM,. >> DID THESE PHOTOGRAPHS TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU OBSERVED THEM? THE CITY MOVES THESE INTO EVIDENCE. >> THANK YOU. [00:35:04] I WILL ACCEPT THESE INTO EVIDENCE AS CITY'S COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY. >> THANK YOU MISS ORTIZ, TELL ME WHAT YOU HAVE FOR ME. >> BECAUSE I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR ALSO ABOUT IT, HE HIRED ME TO CLEAR ALL OF THE VIOLATIONS THAT HE HAS ABOUT WINDOWS AND THEN THE SIDING AND I PULLED THE PERMIT FOR SIDING AND WINDOWS AND ONE OF THE WINDOWS THERE WAS NO WINDOW SILL. I ALSO PULLED A PERMIT FOR THE NEW WINDOW. SO THIS IS THE ONLY PERMIT THAT I WOULD APPLY FOR. THE FIRST COMMENT THAT I GOT FOR THE PERMIT THAT I SUBMITTED, THAT WAS THE WINDOW AND SIDING CACTI FIRST COMMENT WAS THAT I NEEDED THE CERTIFICATION BECAUSE -- AND I'M STILL WAITING FOR THAT CERTIFICATION, WORKING WITH THEM AND I'M JUST CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT THE GENTLEMAN SAID ABOUT WHAT OTHER VIOLATIONS WE HAVE BECAUSE I HAVE OTHER PERMITS THAT I SUBMITTED ABOUT. THIS IS THE ONLY THING THAT I'M WAITING FOR IS THE PERMIT THAT I APPLIED FOR. CAN YOU PLEASE -- >> THE NOTES THAT I HAVE HERE IS THE ONLY PERMIT THAT IS ISSUED CURRENTLY IS FOR YOUR SHUTTERS. >> THIS IS THE ONLY THING THAT IS ISSUED. >> SO THE REROOF CACTI SIDING AND THE WINDOW PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPLIED FOR BUT THEY HAVEN'T BEEN ISSUED. >> YES, YOU ARE RIGHT. WE ARE WAITING FOR THE CERTIFICATION BECAUSE WE CANNOT MOVE FORWARD FOR THE SIDING PERMIT AND FOR THE WINDOW PERMIT WITHOUT THE CERTIFICATION. SO I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG THAT WILL TAKE. I WAS EMAILING AND SPEAKING WITH THEM ABOUT IT BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT WILL BE THE PROCESS FOR THAT I AM WAITING FOR THAT. SO I NEED MORE TIME SO I CAN GET THAT COMPLETE. >> HOW MUCH TIME ARE YOU ASKING FOR? >> AT LEAST 60 DAYS. >> AT LEAST 60 DAYS. OKAY. I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION HERE FOR 60 DAYS. WHAT I AM PREPARED TO DO, I AM PREPARED TO GIVE YOU 90 AND IF, FOR SOME REASON, YOU FIND THAT YOU HAVE RUN OUT OF TIME, YOU CAN REACH OUT TO THE CITY. I DON' MIND THEM GIVING YOU MORE TIME IF IT'S NEEDED BUT I APPRECIATE YOU COMING DOWN AND GETTING THIS TOGETHER. YOU HAVE BEEN QUIET, SIR. IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANTED TO BRING TO MY ATTENTON? >> HE DOESN'T SPEAK ENGLISH. >> YOU SPEAK GOOD ENOUGH, TRUST ME. WONDERFUL. VERY GOOD. ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? ANYTHING FURTHER, MISS ORTIZ? >> NO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH I APPRECIATE IT. >> IT IS THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION DOES EXIST. VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 90 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. MISS ORTIZ, MR., YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE BUT I THANK YOU IN >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. [13. BV2025-00362 914 Ave D Unit A 914 Rentals LLC Miles Keller] HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY. >> YOU AS WELL. >> FOR C13 CASE NUMBER 202,500,362. 914 AVENUE D UNIT A. 914 RENTALS LLC. NEEDS TO BE SWORN IN. PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH. >> I DO. >> THANK YOU. AND WHAT IS YOUR NAME? >> MY FIRST NAME IS JUDO. LAST NAME -- >> DO SPELL YOUR FIRST NAME. [00:40:06] >> JOUDEH TRYING. >> PRONOUNCE IT FOR ME. WHAT'S YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY. WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME, SIR? >> CASE NUMBER BV202500362, 914 AVENUE D UNIT A. ON DECEMBER 5TH 2025. VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 105.1, 2020 PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION ON BALCONY AND ANY OTHER RENOVATIONS BEING DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. RECOMMENDATIONS THE CITY REQUESTS THAT THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED THAT COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. PERMIT HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR 219, 26 AT -- INSTALLED ADMINISTRATIVE INTAKE CURRENTLY PENDING REVIEW. I DO HAVE -- PICTURES OF THE PROPERTY. >> DID YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THESE PICTURES? >> I'VE SEEN THE NOTICE THAT HE POSTED ON THE BUILDING. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THESE? >> I WILL SEE THAT. THANK YOU. MAY I SPEAK? >> NOT JUST YET. >> PROVIDING PHOTOGRAPHS DATED DECEMBER 5TH OF LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> I DID. >> DO THEY ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION AS YOU OBSERVED IT? >> YES. >> DEPOSIT ONE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS COMPOSITE ONE. >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY. >> WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME MR. GHAWDLI. >> THERE'S A BIG MISUNDERSTANDING HERE BUT WE TRIED TO CLEAR IT AT THE BEGINNING. ACROSS THE STREET FROM THAT BUILDING I HAVE ANOTHER BUILDING I PURCHASED AT THE SAME TIME. ADDRESS 907 AVENUE D AND I HAD WORK BEING DONE FOR THE TRUSSES ACROSS THE STREET. DOWNSTAIRS THERE'S A COMPUTER CLASS AND WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE NOISE SO I TOLD MY GUYS TO HAVE ACROSS THE STREET WHERE THE PROPERTY IS. NO WORK WAS DONE ON THIS PROPERTY HOWEVER WHEN MR. KELLER WAS PASSING BY, HE SAW THE SAW AND CAME OUT AND PUT THE STICKER. ONE OF MY GUYS CAME FROM ACROSS THE STREET AND TRIED TO SPEAK WITH HIM AND EXPLAIN FOR HIM HE TOLD HIM HE WAS RUSHING, HE HAD A CLASS. NO WORK WAS DONE TO THIS BALCONY WHATSOEVER. WHEN I CALLED MR. KELLER AND TRIED TO SPEAK WITH HIM, HIS MAIN RESPONSE WAS THIS WOULD LOOK NEW TO ME. THIS WOULD LOOK NEW TOO BUT NOT 1-DAY-OLD SO WHAT I DID, I CONTACTED THE PREVIOUS OWNERS AND I WAS ABLE TO OBTAIN PICTURES FROM THEIR CELL PHONE THAT HAS THE DATES OF THE WORK BEING DONE ON THIS BALCONY IN JUNE AND JULY. OF 2025. AND I HAVE MY CLOSING STATEMENT THAT I PURCHASED THE PROPERTY FIVE MONTHS LATER. HOWEVER I DO UNDERSTAND IT'S MY RESPONSIBILITY TO GET THE PERMIT. AND LIKE HE SAID, I DO HAVE A PERMIT APPLIED. THE BUILDING PERMIT APPROVED WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. I TOLD YOU ALL THIS JUST TO CLEAR FOR HIM AND EVERYBODY THAT NO WORK WAS BEING DONE AND IF YOU HAD INSPECTED IT WHEN YOU PULLED OVER, YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN THAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE AT LEAST SIX MONTHS OLD. >> WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADMIT THAT INTO EVIDENCE? >> THIS? YES PLEASE. >> ATTORNEY HOLLOMAN, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THESE? >> YES. [INDISCERNIBLE] >> IT SHOWS EVERYTHING FIVE MONTHS BEFORE I PURCHASED. I DON'T KNOW IF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL HAVE ANY KIND OF COMMENTS. WE WILL HAVE TO REACH TO THE [00:45:02] ENGINEER AND THEY VISIT A COUPLE OF MONTHS. I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH GETTING THE PERMITTING. I JUST NEVER KNEW THAT WORK WAS DONE WITH NO PERMIT AND NEVER KNEW NONE OF THAT. PURCHASED THE PROPERTY FIVE MONTHS LATER. >> WAS NO OBJECTION I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS RESPONDENT'S COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. SO JUST FOR CLARIFICATION MR. GHAWDLI IT'S YOUR POSITION -- IS IT YOUR POSITION THAT NO NEW WORK HAD EVER BEEN DONE AT THIS -- >> SINCE I PURCHASED IT, NO. >> SINCE YOU PURCHASED IT BUT THE WORK THAT HAD BEEN DONE HAD BEEN DONE PERMIT. BEFORE YOU PURCHASED IT. >> THAT'S WHAT I WAS TOLD. >> UNDERSTOOD. >> BUT YOU CAN LOOK AT THE BALCONY AND THE WORK AND LOOK AT THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE HERE IT'S NOT NEW. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR IT TO BE ALL NEW BECAUSE THAT BALCONY, THOSE STAIRS LEAD TO THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE PROPERTY. SO THE BUILDING DIDN'T JUST GET BUILT. SO 9 OUT OF 10 SOME REPAIRS WAS DONE TO IT WHICH SOMETIMES REPAIRS DOES NOT REQUIRE A PERMIT OR SOME DO. BUT IN ALL CASES, I HAD NO IDEA HOW LONG IT'S BEEN. WOULD STILL LOOK DECENT A YEAR OR TWO LATER. >> IN LIGHT OF THIS YOU STARTED THE PROCESS OF GETTING -- >> THE MINUTE I VISITED THE CITY AND TRIED TO EXPLAIN I WAS TOLD IT'S MY RESPONSIBILITY TO GET A PERMIT. BECAUSE I PURCHASED THE PROPERTY AND I PROCEEDED -- IMMEDIATELY. I CAME TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT A COUPLE OF TIMES AND ASKED FOR EXTENSION BECAUSE THE ENGINEER IS TAKING FOREVER TO GET TO ME. >> THANK YOU FOR BRINGING ME UP TO SPEED. I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION HERE TO ALLOW YOU 60 DAYS TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE. WHAT ARE YOU ASKING ME TO DO? >> IF YOU THINK 60 DAYS IS GOOD ENOUGH, THAT'S FINE. SCHEDULED TO BE REVIEWED TOMORROW BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND I THINK IT'S BEEN AT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR ABOUT FOUR OR FIVE WEEKS NOW. THREE OR FOUR WEEKS. THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVED IT ALREADY. SO IF THEY COME TOMORROW AND AFTER REVIEW SAY IT'S GOOD THEN WE'RE GOOD. I HAVE A PERMIT. IF THEY NEED ANY OTHER INFORMATION, I HAVE TO REACH OUT TO THE ENGINEER. AND SO MUCH THINGS GOING ON. THEY'RE BUSY. SO IT MAY TAKE TIME. IF YOU CAN GIVE ME 90 DAYS TO BE ON THE SAFE SIDE THAT'S FINE. 60, WHATEVER YOU DECIDE, I HAVE TO GO. AND IF IT'S NOT DONE BY THEN I JUST HAVE TO COME ASK FOR ANOTHER EXTENSION. >> ANY RESPONSE FROM THE CITY? >> JUST SO YOU'RE AWARE. YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR THEIR VIEW AT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. -- YOU HAVE TO PAY AT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR FIRE REVIEW. IF THAT MIGHT BE THE HOLDUP. YOU CAN CHECK WITH THEM. >> IT'S PAID. WE PAID RIGHT AWAY BUT IT'S SCHEDULED TO BE REVIEWED TOMORROW. I HAVE A CORPORATE OFFICE AND EVERYTHING. >> ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE PARTIES? IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING OF VIOLATION DOES EXIST AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 90 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED -- INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMITS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS AND FOR ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. MR. GHAWDLI, YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL BUT I DO THANK YOU FOR WORKING QUICKLY TO GET THIS RECTIFIED. NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> THE REASON I ASKED FOR 90 INSTEAD OF 60 DAYS BECAUSE I DRIVE AN HOUR AND A HALF TO COME HERE AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE I HAVE ENOUGH TIME HERE. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR DILIGENCE. IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL TIME, I DON'T MIND YOU SPEAKING TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. >> THEY'VE BEEN GREAT. EVERYONE THERE IS FINE. >> I BELIEVE YOU. ABSOLUTELY. [17. BV2025-00366 2803 Orange Ave The Plumbery Co., LLC  Miles Keller] THANK YOU, SIR. NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> 17 -- 003662803 ORANGE ORANGE AVENUE. >> GOOD MORNING GENTLEMEN. ÚAND WHAT ARE YOUR NAMES? >> FRANK SILVA AND MY FATHER FRANCISCO SILVA. THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. [00:50:02] MR. KELLER, WHAT DO YOU HAVE FOR ME? >> CASE NUMBER BV2025-00366. 2803 ORANGE AVENUE. PLUMBER COMPANY LLC. INITIATED DECEMBER 12TH, 2025. VIOLATION FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 105.1, 2020 PERMIT REQUIRED PIPMC3 04.1, 2021 EXTERIOR STRUCTURE. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, ONE OBTAIN A PERMIT TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY REPAIRS TO THE PROPERTY DUE TO VEHICLE DAMAGE DONE TO THE BUILDING. ANY STRUCTURAL REPAIRS WILL REQUIRE SIGNED AND SEALED REPAIR PLANS DESIGNED BY A REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. TO, OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR, REPLACE THE EXTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE WHERE A VEHICLE STRUCK THE BUILDING. RECOMMENDATION. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS, AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. SO FAR THERE HAS BEEN NO PERMIT FOR THE REPAIR. I DO HAVE PICTURES OF THE PROPERTY AND I DID SPEAK TO THE OWNERS AND THEY DO HAVE SOMEBODY DRAWING UP A SET OF PLANS. >> YOU PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS DATED DECEMBER 12TH LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? DO THEY TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU OBSERVED THEM? >> THEY DO. >> THE MOVIE THE CITY MOVES THIS INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE ONE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITY'S COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. TELL ME WHAT'S GOING ON. >> THERE WAS A CAR CRASH ON DECEMBER 12TH OF 2025. ONE OF THE VEHICLES WE BELIEVE WAS TRYING TO LEAVE THE SCENE AND RAN RIGHT INTO THE BUILDING. WE DID RECEIVE A LETTER FROM THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE SAYING THEY WEREN'T LIABLE FOR THE ACCIDENT EVEN THOUGH THEY WENT INTO THE BUILDING. THAT POINT I THINK MY DAD DROPPED THEM OFF HERE COMING OVER TO MOVE THINGS ALONG SINCE THEN WE'VE GOT SOME DRAWINGS STAMPED BY A LOCAL ENGINEER. SO WE'RE MOVING THINGS ALONG AND SHOULD HAVE THIS WRAPPED UP. >> WONDERFUL. WAS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANTED TO ADD? >> NO. >> I HAVE A RECOMMENDATION HERE FOR 60 DAYS TO GET INTO COMPLIANCE. DO YOU FIND THAT REASONABLE? >> YES. >> ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING FURTHER? >> I DO HAVE A COPY OF THE DRAWINGS IF WE CAN SUBMIT IT. >> IF YOU WANTED TO PASS IT UP TO ATTORNEY HOLLOMAN BUT I'M PREPARED TO TAKE YOUR TESTIMONY ON IT. WITH NO OBJECTION I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIT ONE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU MR. SILVA. IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED PURE COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING PERMIT FOR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. YOU DO HAVE 30 DAYS TO APPEAL IF YOU SO CHOOSE BUT I THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR GETTING THIS RECTIFIED. [2.  24-117  1708 S 8th St  Godinez, Marco & Martinez, Sylvia  Elizabeth Beck] NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> THE NEXT CASE IS 582 CASE NUMBER 24117, 17 '08 SOUTH STREET. MARKO GODINEZ AND SILVIA MARTINEZ THE OWNERS. >> GOOD MORNING. >> WHAT ARE YOUR NAMES? >> MY NAME IS MARIA AND THIS IS SILVIA MARTINEZ, MY MOTHER. [00:55:02] BUY I'M SO SORRY, YOUR NAME AGAIN? I'M SORRY. >> MARIA PARRA. >> AND YOUR MOTHER'S NAME? ALL RIGHT. MRS. BECK. >> WE HAVE A FINE REDUCTION CASE TODAY FOR CASE NUMBER 24-117. 1708 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET. MARCO GODINEZ AND SILVIA MARTINEZ THE OWNERS. THE CASE INITIATED ON JANUARY 16TH, 2024. THE OWNERS ARE MARCO GODINEZ AND SILVIA MARTINEZ OF THE SAME ADDRESS. THE VIOLATION WAS FBC10 5.1 PERMIT REQUIRED. AN ORDER DETERMINING VIOLATION ENTERED JUNE 14TH, 2024. AN AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED AUGUST 20TH 2024. AN ORDER OF RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 60 DAYS WAS APPROVED ON SEPTEMBER 16TH 2024. ANOTHER AFFIDAVIT OF NONCOMPLIANCE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23RD OF 2025. AN ORDER APPROVING RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FROM 30 DAYS WAS APPROVED ON NOVEMBER 13TH 2025 AND AN AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 31ST 2025. FINES ACCRUED IN THIS CASE ARE SHOWN UNDER THE ACTION DATES OF DIFFERENT TIME PERIODS THAT THE FINES ACCRUED. THEY TOTAL $7470. SORRY, LET'S SEE. IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE -- WE HAVE A REQUEST TO REDUCE FINES. THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS HAVE BEEN CALCULATED. AND WE HAVE THREE CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING A FINE REDUCTION. THE GRAVITY OR SERIOUSNESS OF THE VIOLATION WAS MINIMAL. ANY AND ALL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE VIOLATOR TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS OR VIOLATIONS WERE NOT CORRECTED BY THE ORIGINAL VIOLATOR, WHAT ACTION WAS TAKEN BY ANY OTHER PARTY, OWNER OR PARTY IN THE INTEREST TO BRING THE VIOLATION INTO COMPLIANCE. PERMIT WAS OBTAINED AND -- INSPECTED TO THE VIOLATION. THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE VIOLATOR WAS PREVIOUSLY FOUND IN VIOLATION BY EITHER CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE OR OTHER QUASI JUDICIAL OR JUDICIAL PROCESS OR OTHERWISE ADMITTED GUILT IN ANY SUCH PROCEEDING AS ZERO. THESE ARE THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS THAT HAVE BEEN INCURRED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THEY'VE OFFERED -- WE ARE BOUND TO ACCEPT THE ADMINISTRATIVE COST IN THIS CASE. >> THANK YOU. TELL ME WHAT'S GOING ON. >> WE WERE ABLE TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT EVERYTHING THE CASE WAS CLOSED LAST YEAR AND I CALLED TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS NOTHING TO SURPRISE US AGAIN. THEY DID TELL US EVERYTHING WAS GOOD TO GO. WE JUST HEARD THE FINES HAVE ACCRUED SO WE WERE A LITTLE TAKEN BACK BECAUSE WE DIDN'T EXPECT 7000 FROM THAT ENTIRE TIME. I KNOW IT TOOK US SOME TIME, BUT WE'RE NOT ENGINEERS. WE HONESTLY DID THE BEST WE COULD WITH THE TIME GIVEN. WE WERE ABLE TO COMPLETE EVERYTHING. >> THANK YOU FOR BRINGING ME UP TO SPEED THERE. MRS. MARTINEZ, ANYTHING YOU WANTED TO ADD? >> NO, THANK YOU. >> ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE PARTIES? ALL RIGHT. SO MISS PARRA, MRS. MARTINEZ, I RECOGNIZE LIKE YOU SAID YOU ARE NOT ENGINEERS BUT I DO APPRECIATE THAT YOU WORKED SO DILIGENTLY TO GET INTO COMPLIANCE. FOR THAT REASON I AM AMENABLE TO GRANT A REDUCTION FROM THAT 7000 FIGURE. HOWEVER I DON'T SEE ENOUGH HERE FOR ME TO PASS OR GO UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE COST. [01:00:01] THAT WOULD BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY BUT I WILL ENTER AN ORDER REDUCING THE FINES FROM $7470 DOWN TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE COST OF $1109.65. LET ME ASK YOU HOW LONG DO YOU NEED TO MAKE THAT PAYMENT? >> AT LEAST 30 DAYS. >> INTERPRETER: 30 DAYS. HERE'S WHAT I'LL DO. I'LL ENTER AN ORDER ALLOWING 45 DAYS TO MAKE IT, MAKE THE PAYMENT. JUST KNOW IF IT'S NOT PAID IN THE 45 DAYS, IT WILL REVERT BACK TO THAT 7470 FIGURE. SO I ENCOURAGE YOU TO WORK DILIGENTLY ON QUICKLY. ANY QUESTIONS? FANTASTIC. WE WILL GET THAT ORDER ISSUED. THANK YOU. WONDERFUL. >> -- ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE -- ENTERED IN EXHIBIT THAT HE ENTERED BY MISTAKE. AND HE'D LIKE TO TAKE THAT BACK. >> I'LL ALLOW IT. [1. BV2025-00236 2621 S Indian River Dr  Christopher, Daniel & Karen  Miles Keller] >> CASE NUMBER 25 -- 002362621. >> I'M SO SORRY. AM I RIGHT THAT I OVERHEARD THAT HE DIDN'T MAKE A MISTAKE. UNDERSTOOD. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING. HE DID NOT REMOVE ANYTHING FROM HIS EXHIBITS. WONDERFUL. SORRY FOR THE INTERRUPTION. WHAT WAS THE CASE NUMBER AGAIN? >> FOR. >> SPEAKER-01: CASE NUMBER BV2025002 -- 286. 2621 SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE. DANIEL AND KAREN CHRISTOPHER ARE THE OWNERS. >> CASE NUMBER BV202500236, 2621 SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE. CASE INITIATED AUGUST 28TH, 2025. VIOLATION FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 105.24.1.1 PERMIT EXPIRED PEER CORRECTIVE ACTIONS RENEW EXPIRED PERMITS RBLDG2024-00442. AND RBLDG2024-00443 OR OBTAIN A NEW PERMIT. RECOMMENDATION THE CITY REQUESTS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS. THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. SO FAR BOTH PERMITS ARE EXPIRED. >> ANYTHING FURTHER? IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 30 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT. OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE PLEASE. [9. BV2025-00337  425 N 26th St  Pardo, Priscy  Michael Waldrop] [01:05:06] >> THE NEXT CASE IS FOR. >> SPEAKER-09: CASE NUMBER B202-050-0237. NORTH 26TH STREET. CASEY IS THE OWNER -- >> NOBODY. >> I'M MICHAEL WALDRIP. INVESTIGATOR. THIS CASE B2025-00337. FOR 25 NORTH 26TH STREET. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED ON NOVEMBER 17TH 2025. THE OWNER IS PRISCY PARDO. 4607 CALHOUN PALM COURT GREENACRES, FLORIDA. THE VIOLATION IS FBC10 5.1 2020 PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTION TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE HVAC SYSTEMS INSTALLED WITHOUT PERMIT AND ANY OTHER RENOVATIONS DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS, AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. EXCUSE ME. SERVICE UPGRADE -- I. WILL START OVER. THERE'S NO A C PERMITS AT THIS TIME. THE UPGRADE PERMIT IS EXPIRED. THERE'S A STUCCO PERMIT COM COMPLETE. I DO HAVE PICTURES. >> PROVIDING PHOTOGRAPHS DATED NOVEMBER 7TH -- 17TH AND 18TH OF LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS PLEASE. >> YES. >> DO THEY TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU OBSERVED IT? >> THEY DO. >> AND TO THIS AND TO CITY COMPOSITE ONE. >> THANK YOU. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS COMPOSITE ONE. NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY. >> THIS COURT'S FINDING THAT A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED TO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED [11. BV2025-00358  1707 Miami Court  Mondono, Nash  Michael Waldrop] WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS B202,500,358. 1707 MIAMI COURT. NASH MONDONO IS THE OWNER. >> CASE NUMBER VV2025. 1707 MIAMI COURT. THIS WAS INITIATED ON NOVEMBER 24TH, 2025. THE OWNER IS NASH MONDONO. 17 '07 MIAMI COURT. FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, 34950. VIOLATIONS ARE FBC10 5.1, 2020 PERMIT REQUIRED. IPMC30 4.1 2021 EXTERIOR STRUCTURE. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE ONE OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR WORK BEING DONE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF PERMIT RBLDG-2024-00839 INCLUDING FRAMING, INSTALLATION OF VAPOR BARRIER, SIDING AND ANY OTHER RENOVATION WORK BEING DONE OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF CURRENT PERMIT. TWO, OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR OR REPLACE THE EXTERIOR OF THE [01:10:04] STRUCTURE THAT IS CURRENTY OPEN AND UNFINISHED MAKING IT SAFE FOR OCCUPANCY. THE THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE RECOMMENDATION IS SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS, AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. >> THESE PHOTOGRAPHS DATED NOVEMBER 24TH LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS PLEASE BUY YES. >> DO THEY TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION AS YOU OBSERVED IT PLEASE. >> YES. >> MOVE INTO EVIDENCE DEPOSIT ONE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITIES COMPOSITE ONE. >> I DIDN'T GET TO STATE THAT THERE'S NO NEW PERMIT OR REVISION TO THE EXISTING PERMIT. THERE'S NO PERMITS AT THIS TIME. OR NEW PERMITS. SORRY. >> THANK YOU. IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING A VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT. OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED HERE COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS OF -- DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE -- ASSESSED WITH 30 DAYS [14. BV2025-00363  609 N 22nd St George and Family Inc.  Michael Waldrop] TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE. >> 4C14 -- FOR 609 NORTH 22ND STREET. GEORGE AND FAMILY INC. IS THE OWNER. >> THIS CASE BV2025-00363. 609 NORTH 22ND STREET. THE CASE WAS INITIATED ON DECEMBER 82025. THE OWNER IS GEORGE AND FAMILY INC. 20380 NW SEVENTH AVE. MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33169-2406. THE VIOLATIONS ARE FBC10 5.1 2020, PERMIT REQUIRED PIPMC3 04.6, 2021 EXTERIOR WALLS. IPMC30 4.7, 2021 ROOFS AND DRAINAGE. IPMC30 5.3, 2021 INTERIOR SURFACES. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ONE, OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THAT'S PERFORMED WITHOUT A PERMIT. OBTAIN A PERMIT TO REPAIR OR REPLACE THE DAMAGED EXTERIOR WALLS. HOME HAS MANY ACTIVE LEAKS AND INTERIOR. FOR PAINT OR REPAIR INTERIOR STRUCTURES OF THE SERVICE -- STRUCTURE AS REQUIRED. MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO WATER DAMAGED CEILING, REPLACE MISSING DRYWALL. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS, AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED FOR THE A C. WATER HEATER AND THE ROOF. IN ADDITION TO PERMITTED ITEMS A VIOLATION TO COMPLY -- I. HAVE PICTURES. >> PROVIDING PHOTOGRAPHS DATED DECEMBER 8TH OF LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES. >> DO THEY TRULY AND ACCURATELY -- CITY MOVES INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE ONE. >> I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITY'S COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ONE. >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY. >> THANK YOU. IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING OF VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL [01:15:02] FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRED -- NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT. [15. BV2025-00364  1215 Raymond Ave  Alo Earth Ventures LLC  Michael Waldrop] FINE $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> 4C, 15. CASE NUMBER BV2025-00364. 1215 RAYMOND AVENUE. ALO EARTH VENTURES LLC IS THE OWNER. >> THIS IS CASE NUMBER BV2 BV2025-00364. 1215 RAYMOND AVENUE. CASE WAS INITIATED ON DECEMBER 8, 2025. THE OWNER IS ALO EARTH VENTURES LLC. 1371 EDGEWATER DRIVE ORLANDO, FLORIDA, 32804-6350. VIOLATIONS RFBC10 5.1, 2020 PERMIT REQUIRED. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, TO OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE DEMOLITION OF A FIREPLACE, CHIMNEY AND ANY OTHER EXTERIOR OR INTERIOR REPAIRS RESULTING FROM REMOVAL. INCLUDING FRAMING, ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, INSULATION, DRYWALL, SHEATHING, WATERPROOFING, WIRE LATH AND STUCCO. THE CITY REQUESTS THAT IF THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FINDS THE VIOLATION EXISTS, THE VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED, COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS, AND, CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250.00 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. SO FAR WE HAVE NO PERMITS. >> PROVIDING PHOTOGRAPHS DECEMBER 8TH OF LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES, MA'AM. >> IT LOOKS LIKE A PICTURE WITHIN A PICTURE. >> LET ME SEE HERE. ONE OF THESE WAS PROVIDED TO ME. THIS WAS FORWARDED OVER ORIGINALLY. THE FIRST PICTURE YOU SEE WITH THE WRITING ON IT I BELIEVE IS CODE ENFORCEMENT. WITH THE CHIMNEY. >> IT APPEARS TO BE THE SAME HOUSE FROM YOUR OBSERVATIONS? DO THESE PHOTOGRAPHS TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATIONS AS YOU OBSERVED IT? >> YES. >> CITY MOVES INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE ONE. >> THANK YOU. I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITY'S COMPOSITE ONE. >> NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY. >> THANK YOU. IT'S THIS COURT'S FINDING A VIOLATION EXISTS AND THE VIOLATOR BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND PROCURE ALL OTHER -- CURE OTHER VIOLATIONS NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED WITH 30 DAYS TO APPEAL. NEXT CASE PLEASE. >> NEXT CASE... [INDISCERNIBLE] >> YOU'RE IN AUDIO ATTENDANCE OF THE HEARING. CAN YOU PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE PROVIDING WILL BE THE TRUTH. >> YES, MA'AM,. >> THE CASE NUMBER FOR THIS IS 4C5BV2025-00323. 2002 SOUTH TENTH STREET UNIT C. EVERGLADES A. DLLC IS THE OWNER. >> HOW ARE YOU? [01:20:03] >> I'M GOOD HERE COULD YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. >> MY NAME IS ANDREA KENNEDY. >> MISS KENNEDY, WHAT IS YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROPERTY? >> I'M THE PRESIDENT AND OWNER OF EVERGLADES A. DLLC. >> I WILL ALLOW THE CITY TO PRESENT THEIR CASE AND I WILL TURN TO YOU TO ALLOW YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. [5. BV2025-00323  2002 S 10th St Unit C  Everglades A  D LLC  Miles Keller] >> OKAY. >> THANK YOU. MR. KELLER? >> CASE NUMBER B2025-00323. 2002 SOUTH TENTH STREET UNIT C CASE INITIATED -- BUILDING CODE 105.1 2020 PERMIT REQUIRED. OBTAIN A PERMIT FOR THE ELECTRICAL WORK DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. RECOMMENDATIONS THE CITY REQUESTS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FIND THE VIOLATION EXISTS. VIOLATORS BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A PERMIT, OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED. COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS AND CURE ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY BE ASSESSED. SO FAR THERE IS NO PERMIT FOR THE WORK THAT WAS DONE. >> DO YOU HAVE PHOTOS ON THIS? >> I DO HAVE PHOTOS OF THE WORK. >> PROVIDED PHOTOGRAPHS STATED NOVEMBER OF LAST YEAR. DID YOU TAKE THESE PHOTOGRAPHS? >> YES, I DID. >> DO THEY TRULY AND ACCURATELY DEPICT THE VIOLATION AS YOU'VE OBSERVED IT. >> YES, THEY DO. >> CITY MOVES INTO EVIDENCE COMPOSITE ONE. >> THANK YOU. I WILL ACCEPT THIS INTO EVIDENCE AS CITY'S COMPOSITE ONE. MISS KENNEDY, PLEASE TELL ME WHAT IS GOING UNHAPPY AT. >> I DON'T DISPUTE ANYTHING WITHOUT THE CODE INVESTIGATORS STATE I PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY AT THE END OF AUGUST AND WHEN I GOT THE INSPECTION THEY TOLD ME THAT THE OUTSIDE ELECTRIC PANEL WAS A SERIOUS FIRE HAZARD AND I NEEDED TO GET IT FIXED. I HIRED A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN, AND HE DID THE WORK. WHEN I ASKED HIM, I SAID HEY, I WAS UNAWARE THAT WE NEEDED A PERMIT AND BE READ TO THEM PULL A PERMIT, WE DIDN'T DO THAT. HE INFORMED ME THAT JUST BECAUS HE'S LICENSED DOESN'T MEAN THAT HE CAN PULL A PERMIT, SO IT WOULD HAVE TO BE HIS BOSS OR TH COMPANY THAT HE WORKS FOR THERE WOULD HAVE TO DO THE PERMIT. THAT MAN IS OUT OF THE COUNTRY UNTIL JUNE 20TH. SO I JUST NEED MORE TIME TO GET HIM TO DO THAT. I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION PURRED WASN'T SURE IF I NEED TO WAIT FOR HIM OR IF THERE IS A WAY THAT I AS A HOMEOWNER CAN PULL PERMIT. >> IS THERE A RESPONSE FROM THE CITY ON THAT? >> IT HAS TO BE PULLED FROM THE CONTRACTOR. SO I DO HAVE A RECOMMENDATION I FRONT OF ME TO WRECK OUR U.S. CANFORA SOMETHING DIFFERENT THA THAT? >> NO, THAT SHOULD BE PLENTY. >> IS THEIR SOMETHING ELSE SHE WANTED TO BRING TO MY GIG A APPRECIATE YOU LETTING ME ATTEN BY PHONE. >> THANK YOU FOR MAKING THAT TIME. ANYTHING FURTHER FROM THE CITY? >> NOT AT THIS TIME. >> IT'S A COURT FINDING THAT A VIOLATION DOES EXIST. THE VIOLATOR WILL BE GIVEN 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS, AT LEAST WITH EVERY 180 DAYS UNTIL THE PERMIT HAS BEEN CLOSED RIGHT CHEER ALL OTHER VIOLATIONS DESCRIBED IN ORDER NOT REQUIRIN A PERMIT OR A FINE OF $250 PER DAY WILL BE ASSESSED. DAYS TO APPEAL THIS DECISION IF YOU CHOOSE, BUT I THANK YOU FOR YOUR DILIGENCE IN GETTING THIS RESOLVED. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR. >> BE WELL. NEXT CASE. >> THE NEXT CASE IS ALSO A FALL. [01:25:03] >> HELLO. >> HIGH, IS THIS TIFFANY? >> YES. >> THIS IS THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING. CAN YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND? >> YES. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU WILL BE GIVING WILL BE THE TRUTH? >> S, IT WILL. >> OKAY. THE CASE NUMBER IS 581 CASE NUMBER 23715 SOUTH OCEAN DRIVE, BOARDWALK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC. >> THIS IS SPECIAL MAGISTRATE PERRAULT, HOW ARE YOU? >> I'M DOING WELL THANK YOU, HAPPY TO BE HERE. COULD YOU KINDLY STATE YOUR NAM FOR THE RECORD? >> IT IS TIFFANY WRIGHT OFEIMU THANK YOU. I AM GOING TO ALLOW THE CITY TO PRESENT IT SIDE AND THEN I WILL TURN TO YOU TO HEAR YOUR SIDE O THE CASE. >> THANK YOU. >> THIS IS 23 TEST 198-1715 SOUTH OCEAN DRIVE BOARDWALK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC. IS THE OWNER. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED JULY 5T OF 2023 AND THERE WE'RE REVISIONS TO THE VIOLATION WITH THE DATES SHOWN ON THE SUMMARY SHEET. THE OWNER IS BOARDWALK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC., SUITE 100, 33494. THE VIOLATIONS WHERE WERE IPM C 301-POINT 0, STAIRWAYS, DECKS, PORCHES, AND BALCONIES. THE EXTERIOR WALLS. 304.15 DOORS. IPM C 603-POINT WHEN MECHANICAL ONE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES. HANDRAILS AND GUARDS, 505-POINT TO CONTAMINATION. AN ORDER DETERMINING VIOLATION WAS ENTERED ON JUNE 14TH OF 202 BRIGHT. AND NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF 30 DAYS 2024. AND WAS RECORDED ON SEPTEMBER 23RD OF 2024 IN ORDER TO NINE RESPONDENTS REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO STOP THE ACCRUAL OF FINES AND AN AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE WAS RECORDED ON MARCH 262026. FINES FUNDS HAVE ACCRUED IN THI CASE TOTALING THERE ARE THREE CRITERIA TO CONSIDER FOR A FINE REDUCTION IN THEY ARE THE GRAVITY OR SERIOUSNESS OF THE VIOLATION WAS BOND RATES, ANY I ALL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE VIOLATOR TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS WERE OF THE VIOLATIONS WERE CORRECTED * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.